Randomized trial of one versus two adjuvant hyperthermia treatments per week in patients with superficial tumours

Biological treatment evaluation in thermoradiotherapy: application in cervical cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermia treatment quality is usually evaluated by thermal (dose) parameters, though hyperthermic radiosensitization effects are also influenced by the time interval between the two modalities. This work applies biological modelling for clinical treatment evaluation of cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia by calculating the equivalent radiation dose (EQDRT, i.e., the dose needed for the same effect with radiation alone). Subsequent analyses evaluate the impact of logistics.

METHODS

Biological treatment evaluation was performed for 58 patients treated with 23-28 fractions of 1.8-2 Gy plus 4-5 weekly hyperthermia sessions. Measured temperatures (T50) and recorded time intervals between the radiotherapy and hyperthermia sessions were used to calculate the EQDRT using an extended linear quadratic (LQ) model with hyperthermic LQ parameters based on extensive experimental data. Next, the impact of a 30-min time interval (optimized logistics) as well as a 4‑h time interval (suboptimal logistics) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Median average measured T50 and recorded time intervals were 41.2 °C (range 39.7-42.5 °C) and 79 min (range 34-125 min), respectively, resulting in a median total dose enhancement (D50) of 5.5 Gy (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-6.6 Gy). For 30-min time intervals, the enhancement would increase by ~30% to 7.1 Gy (IQR 5.5-8.1 Gy; p < 0.001). In case of 4‑h time intervals, an ~ 40% decrease in dose enhancement could be expected: 3.2 Gy (IQR 2.3-3.8 Gy; p < 0.001). Normal tissue enhancement was negligible (< 0.3 Gy), even for short time intervals.

CONCLUSION

Biological treatment evaluation is a useful addition to standard thermal (dose) evaluation of hyperthermia treatments. Optimizing logistics to shorten time intervals seems worthwhile to improve treatment efficacy.

Harnessing Hyperthermia: Molecular, Cellular, and Immunological Insights for Enhanced Anticancer Therapies

Hyperthermia, the raising of tumor temperature (≥39°C), holds great promise as an adjuvant treatment for cancer therapy. This review focuses on 2 key aspects of hyperthermia: its molecular and cellular effects and its impact on the immune system. Hyperthermia has profound effects on critical biological processes. Increased temperatures inhibit DNA repair enzymes, making cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation. Elevated temperatures also induce cell cycle arrest and trigger apoptotic pathways. Furthermore, hyperthermia modifies the expression of heat shock proteins, which play vital roles in cancer therapy, including enhancing immune responses. Hyperthermic treatments also have a significant impact on the body's immune response against tumors, potentially improving the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Mild systemic hyperthermia (39°C-41°C) mimics fever, activating immune cells and raising metabolic rates. Intense heat above 50°C can release tumor antigens, enhancing immune reactions. Using photothermal nanoparticles for targeted heating and drug delivery can also modulate the immune response. Hyperthermia emerges as a cost-effective and well-tolerated adjuvant therapy when integrated with immunotherapy. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for the selection of patient-specific treatments and the guidance of future experimental studies.

Real World Analysis of Quality of Life and Toxicity in Cancer Patients Treated with Hyperthermia Combined with Radio(chemo)therapy

Hyperthermia (HT) in combination with radio(chemo)therapy (RCT) is a well-established cancer treatment strategy. This report analyses the quality of life (QoL), toxicity and survival outcomes in patients with different tumor entities who received HT in combination with RCT. The primary endpoint of this study was the assessment of QoL scale items 3 and 12 months after treatment in patients who were treated with palliative intent and curative intent, respectively. The secondary endpoints of this study were acute toxicities, 1-year overall survival (OS), and local progression-free survival (LPFS). Patients treated with curative intent experienced significant improvement in emotional functioning (EF), social functioning (SF), financial difficulties (FI) and insomnia (SL) 12 months after treatment. Patients had significantly improved FI and pain (PA) three months after palliative treatment. Acute toxicity of grade 3 or more was 26% during treatment and 4% after three months. The 1-year OS rates were 90% (95% CI: 79-96%) and 44% (95% CI: 31-59%) for patients treated with curative and palliative RCT combined with HT, respectively. Moreover, the 1-year LPFS rates were 94% (95% CI: 84-98%) for patients treated with curative intent and 64% (95% CI: 50-77%) for palliative patients. In summary, combined RCT and HT stabilized or improved QoL scale items for both curative and palliative indications.

Avoiding Pitfalls in Thermal Dose Effect Relationship Studies: A Review and Guide Forward

The challenge to explain the diffuse and unconclusive message reported by hyperthermia studies investigating the thermal dose parameter is still to be unravelled. In the present review, we investigated a wide range of technical and clinical parameters characterising hyperthermia treatment to better understand and improve the probability of detecting a thermal dose effect relationship in clinical studies. We performed a systematic literature review to obtain hyperthermia clinical studies investigating the associations of temperature and thermal dose parameters with treatment outcome or acute toxicity. Different hyperthermia characteristics were retrieved, and their influence on temperature and thermal dose parameters was assessed. In the literature, we found forty-eight articles investigating thermal dose effect relationships. These comprised a total of 4107 patients with different tumour pathologies. The association between thermal dose and treatment outcome was the investigated endpoint in 90% of the articles, while the correlation between thermal dose and toxicity was investigated in 50% of the articles. Significant associations between temperature-related parameters and treatment outcome were reported in 63% of the studies, while those between temperature-related parameters and toxicity were reported in 15% of the studies. One clear difficulty for advancement is that studies often omitted fundamental information regarding the clinical treatment, and among the different characteristics investigated, thermometry details were seldom and divergently reported. To overcome this, we propose a clear definition of the terms and characteristics that should be reported in clinical hyperthermia treatments. A consistent report of data will allow their use to further continue the quest for thermal dose effect relationships.

Clinical Evidence for Thermometric Parameters to Guide Hyperthermia Treatment

Hyperthermia (HT) is a cancer treatment modality which targets malignant tissues by heating to 40-43 °C. In addition to its direct antitumor effects, HT potently sensitizes the tumor to radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT), thereby enabling complete eradication of some tumor entities as shown in randomized clinical trials. Despite the proven efficacy of HT in combination with classic cancer treatments, there are limited international standards for the delivery of HT in the clinical setting. Consequently, there is a large variability in reported data on thermometric parameters, including the temperature obtained from multiple reference points, heating duration, thermal dose, time interval, and sequence between HT and other treatment modalities. Evidence from some clinical trials indicates that thermal dose, which correlates with heating time and temperature achieved, could be used as a predictive marker for treatment efficacy in future studies. Similarly, other thermometric parameters when chosen optimally are associated with increased antitumor efficacy. This review summarizes the existing clinical evidence for the prognostic and predictive role of the most important thermometric parameters to guide the combined treatment of RT and CT with HT. In conclusion, we call for the standardization of thermometric parameters and stress the importance for their validation in future prospective clinical studies.

Hyperthermia and radiation reduce the toxic side-effects of bufadienolides for cancer therapy

Bufadienolides are constituents of the traditional Chinese medicine Chan Su and are found in toad venom. Cardiovascular side-effects are one of the limiting factors towards developing bufadienolides as chemotherapeutic agents. Thus, in the present study, low doses of bufalin and cinobufotalin, prominent members of the bufadienolides, were investigated for their cytotoxic activity in combination with hyperthermia (HT) or radiation (Rad) therapy. In addition, the underlying mechanism involved was investigated. A DNA fragmentation assay, viability assay and microscopic observation were primarily used to assess the effect of low doses of the two drugs in human lymphoma U937 cells. Furthermore, the effects of these drugs on the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and apoptotic-associated protein activation were investigated. HT/bufadienolide- and RT/bufadienolide-treated samples significantly increased the DNA fragmentation percentile and decreased the MMP, as well as increasing the apoptotic features observed microscopically within a relatively short time (6 h) after treatment. The two combinations affected the expression of important apoptotic markers, including caspase-3 and BH3 interacting domain death agonist. The findings of the current study confirm the additive effect of HT with this group of drugs, directing a novel therapeutic avenue for the clinical use of bufadienolides at lower doses with more restrained cardio toxic side-effects.

Rib fractures after reirradiation plus hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer: Predictive factors

Background

Combining reirradiation (reRT) and hyperthermia (HT) has shown high therapeutic value for patients with locoregional recurrent breast cancer (LR). However, additional toxicity of reirradiation (e.g., rib fractures) may occur. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of potential risk factors on the occurrence of rib fractures.

Patients and methods

From 1982–2005, 234 patients were treated with adjuvant reRT + HT after surgery for LR. ReRT consisted typically of 8 fractions of  4 Gy twice a week, or 12 fractions of  3 Gy four times a week. A total of 118 patients were irradiated with abutted photon and electron fields. In all, 60 patients were irradiated using either one or alternating combinations of abutted AP electron fields. Hyperthermia was given once or twice a week.

Results

The 5-year infield local control (LC) rate was 70 %. Rib fractures were detected in 16 of 234 patients (actuarial risk: 7 % at 5 years). All rib fractures occurred in patients treated with a combination of photon and abutted electron fields (p = 0.000); in 15 of 16 patients fractures were located in the abutment regions. The other significant predictive factors for rib fractures were a higher fraction dose (p = 0.040), large RT fields, and treatment before the year 2000.

Discussion and conclusion

ReRT + HT results in long-term LC. The majority of rib fractures were located in the photon/electron abutment area, emphasizing the disadvantage of field overlap. Large abutted photon/electron fields combined with 4 Gy fractions increase the number of rib fractures in this study group. However, as these factors were highly correlated no relative importance of the individual factors could be estimated. Increasing the number of HT sessions a week does not increase the risk of rib fractures.

Reirradiation and hyperthermia for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area: Size matters

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Treatment options for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area are limited. Hyperthermia, elevating tumor temperature to 40-45°C, sensitizes radio-and-chemotherapy. Four hundred and fourteen patients treated with reirradiation+hyperthermia (reRT+HT) in the AMC(n=301) and the BVI(n=113), from 1982 to 2005 were retrospectively analyzed for treatment response, locoregional control (LC) and prognostic factors for LC and toxicity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

All patients received previous irradiation (median 50 Gy). reRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy-2/week (AMC) or 12 × 3 Gy-4/week (BVI). Hyperthermia was added once (AMC)/twice (BVI) a week.

RESULTS

Overall clinical response rate was 86%. The 3-year LC rate was 25%. The number of recurrence episodes, distant metastases (DM), tumor site, tumor size, time to recurrence and treatment year were significant for LC. Acute ⩾ grade 3 toxicity occurred in 24% of patients. Actuarial late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity was 23% at 3-years. In multivariable analysis reRT fraction dose was significantly related to late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

reRT+HT is an effective curative and palliative treatment option for patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area. Early referral, treatment of chest wall recurrences ⩽ 5 cm in the absence of distant metastases, provided the highest local control rates. The cumulative effects of past and present treatments should be accounted for by adjusting treatment protocol to minimize toxicity.

Hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy for superficial breast cancer and chest wall recurrence: a review of the randomised data

Hyperthermia has long been used in combination with radiation for the treatment of superficial malignancies, in part due to its radiosensitising capabilities. Patients who suffer superficial recurrences of breast cancer, be it in their chest wall following mastectomy, or in their breast after breast conservation, typically have poor clinical outcomes. They often develop distant metastatic disease, but one must not overlook the problems associated with an uncontrolled local failure. Morbidity is enormous, and can significantly impair quality of life. There is no accepted standard of care in treating superficial recurrences of breast cancer, particularly in patients that have previously been irradiated. There is a substantial literature regarding the combined use of hyperthermia and radiotherapy for these superficial recurrences. Most of it is retrospective in nature, but there are several larger phase III randomised trials that show an improved rate of clinical complete response in patients treated with both modalities. In this review article, we will highlight the important prospective data that has been published regarding the combined use of hyperthermia and radiation.

Randomized trial of hyperthermia and radiation for superficial tumors

PURPOSE

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated hyperthermia (HT) enhances radiation response. These trials, however, generally lacked rigorous thermal dose prescription and administration. We report the final results of a prospective randomized trial of superficial tumors (</= 3 cm depth) comparing radiotherapy versus HT combined with radiotherapy, using the parameter describing the number of cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C exceeded by 90% of monitored points within the tumor (CEM 43 degrees C T(90)) as a measure of thermal dose.

METHODS

This trial was designed to test whether a thermal dose of more than 10 CEM 43 degrees C T(90) results in improved complete response and duration of local control compared with a thermal dose of </= 1 CEM 43 degrees C T(90). Patients received a test dose of HT </= 1 CEM 43 degrees C T(90) and tumors deemed heatable were randomly assigned to additional HT versus no additional HT. HT was given using microwave spiral strip applicators operating at 433 MHz.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled; 109 (89%) were deemed heatable and were randomly assigned. The complete response rate was 66.1% in the HT arm and 42.3% in the no-HT arm. The odds ratio for complete response was 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8; P = .02). Previously irradiated patients had the greatest incremental gain in complete response: 23.5% in the no-HT arm versus 68.2% in the HT arm. No overall survival benefit was seen.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant hyperthermia with a thermal dose more than 10 CEM 43 degrees C T(90) confers a significant local control benefit in patients with superficial tumors receiving radiation therapy.

Chemoradiotherapy Combined With Intracavitary Hyperthermia for Anal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate in a randomized way the clinical benefit of addition of intracavitary hyperthermia (ICHT) to a conventional chemoradiotherapy schedule in patients with T2-T3N0M0 anal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C combined with radiotherapy with (arm A: 24 patients) or without ICHT (arm B: 25 patients). A microwave applicator operating at 433 MHz inserted into the anal-rectal cavity was used for ICHT. Patients in both arms received 1000 mg/m2 per day of 5-FU on days 1-4 and days 28-31 plus 15 mg/m mitomycin-C on day 1. Radiotherapy was administered with a dose of 41.4 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction) plus a booster dose of 14 Gy (2 Gy per fraction).

RESULTS

One patient from group A developed severe mucositis, whereas no severe morbidity was noted in the rest of the patients in both groups. The incidence of lower-intestine acute reactions was higher in the ICHT arm. After a 5-year follow up in the hyperthermia arm, 23 of 24 patients (95.8%) preserved their anorectal function and avoided permanent colostomy, whereas in the second arm, 17 of 25 (68.0%) had sphincter preservation. Local recurrence-free survival time was significantly higher in the ICHT arm (P = 0.0107, log rank test), whereas no significant difference in overall survival was noted.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ICHT to the chemoradiotherapy schedule of anal cancer seems to offer a new effective and safe therapeutic modality. The preservation of anorectal function seems to be the significant clinical benefit of adjuvant ICHT.

Temperature mapping of laser-induced hyperthermia in an ocular phantom using magnetic resonance thermography

Laser-induced heating in an ocular phantom is measured with magnetic resonance thermography (MRT) using temperature-dependent phase changes in proton resonance frequency. The ocular phantom contains a layer of melanosomes isolated from bovine retinal pigment epithelium. The phantom is heated by the 806-nm output of a continuous wave diode laser with an irradiance of 2.4 to 21.6 W/cm2 in a beam radius of 0.8 or 2.4 mm, depending on the experiment. MRT is performed with a 2 T magnet, and a two-turn, 6-cm-diam, circular radio frequency coil. Two-dimensional temperature gradients are measured within the plane of the melanin layer, as well as normal to it, with a temperature resolution of 1 degrees C or better. The temperature gradients extending within the melanin layer are broader than those orthogonal to the layer, consistent with the higher optical absorption and consequent heating in the melanin. The temperature gradients in the phantom measured by MRT closely approximate the predictions of a classical heat diffusion model. Three-dimensional temperature maps with a spatial resolution of 0.25 mm in all directions are also made. Although the temporal resolution is limited in the prototype system (22.9 s for a single image "slice"), improvements in future implementations are likely. These results indicate that MRT has sufficient spatial and temperature resolution to monitor target tissue temperature during transpupillary thermotherapy in the human eye.

Use of whole body hyperthermia as a method to heat inaccessible tumours uniformly: a phase III trial in canine brain masses

In this study, whole body hyperthermia (WBH) was assessed as a means of heating intracranial tumours uniformly. Twenty-five dogs received radiation therapy and 20 the combination of radiation and WBH. Total radiation dose was randomly assigned and was either 44, 48, 52, 56 or 60 Gy. Because of WBH toxicity, intercurrent disease or tumour progression, seven of the 45 dogs received less than the prescribed radiation dose. For WBH, the target rectal temperature was 42 degrees C for 2h and three treatments were planned. In five of the 20 dogs randomized to receive WBH, only one WBH treatment was given because of toxicity. WBH toxicity was severe in six dogs, and resulted in death or interruption in treatment. Most tumours did not undergo a complete response, making it impossible to differentiate tumour recurrence from brain necrosis as a cause of progressive neuropathy. Therefore, survival was the major study endpoint. There was no survival difference between groups. One-year survival probability (95% CI) for dogs receiving radiation therapy alone was 0.44 (0.25, 0.63) versus 0.40 (0.19, 0.63) for dogs receiving radiation and WBH. There was no difference in the incidence of brain necrosis in the two treatment groups. Results suggest that use of WBH alone to increase the temperature of intracranial tumours as a means to improve radiation therapy outcome is not a successful strategy.

Effect of i.v. glucose versus combined i.v. plus oral glucose on human tumour extracellular pH for potential sensitization to thermoradiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to determine whether intravenous or combined intravenous plus oral glucose administration was more effective inducing acute tumour acidification. Seventeen nondiabetic patients at the Henan Tumour Hospital with superficial tumour deposits of various histologies and size were administered, after fasting, either 50 g glucose intravenously (i.v., in 100 ml over 10 min) or 50 g i.v. glucose (in 100 ml over 10 min) combined with 100 g oral glucose (in 200 ml; i.v. + oral). Extracellular tumour pH (pHe) was determined with one or two indwelling needle combination pH microelectrodes. Blood glucose concentration was determined every 15-20 min by finger stick with Chem-Strips and a Glucometer. Ten patients received i.v. glucose, and seven patients received i.v. + oral glucose. Blood glucose rose to 430 +/- 15 mg/dL in both groups. However, the rate of clearance of blood glucose was greater for the i.v. glucose than for the i.v. + oral glucose group (p < 0.00002), and thus the blood glucose levels remained elevated longer after i.v. + oral than after i.v. glucose administration. Relative to the initial fasting blood glucose concentration, blood glucose was -2 +/- 7 mg/dL at 110 min after glucose administration by the i.v. route, whereas, blood glucose relative to initial values was 143 + 23 mg/dL by 110 min after glucose administration by the i.v. + oral route, p = 0.000004. The initial pHe values in the two groups of tumours were similar, 7.34 +/- 0.09 (6.78-7.71) and 7.35 +/- 0.08 (6.99-7.61), respectively. After i.v. glucose, tumour acidification occurred in nine of ten patients (-0.16 + 0.02 pH unit, range -0.24 to -0.05), and after i.v. + oral glucose tumour acidification occurred in six of seven patients (-0.19 +/- 0.07 pH unit, range -0.43 to -0.06). When the initial fasting blood glucose concentration was in excess of 82 mg/dL, all patients (12/12) exhibited tumour acidification during hyperglycaemia, whereas, only 3/5 patients exhibited tumour acidification when the initial blood glucose concentration was less than 82 mg/dL (p = 0.07). The time to maximum decrease in tumour pHe was significantly shorter after i.v. + oral glucose than after i.v. glucose (e.g., 67 +/- 11 versus 102 +/- 8 min, p = 0.02) and correlated with the rate of clearance of blood glucose (p = 0.02, r = 0.55). Larger tumours tended to exhibit a greater decrease in pHe (p = 0.08, r = 0.04). The only side effects of hyperglycaemia were transient nausea and increased urinary output. The effect of hyperglycaemia induced by administration of 200 g oral glucose was similar to i.v. administration in that 83% of tumours exhibited acidification of 0.14 +/- 0.02 pH unit by 91 +/- 7 min. We conclude that i.v. and i.v. + oral glucose administration are equally effective inducing tumour acute acidification, but no more effective than 200 g oral glucose, for investigation of hyperglycemic sensitization to thermoradiotherapy.

Biological rationale and clinical experience with hyperthermia

Hyperthermia (HT) as an adjunct to radiation therapy (RT) has been a focus of interest in cancer management in recent years there have been numerous randomized and nonrandomized studies conducted to assess the efficacy of HT combined with either RT or chemotherapy especially in the treatment of superficially seated malignant tumors. The major impact of HT is currently on locoregional control of tumor. Heat may be directly cytotoxic to tumor cells or inhibit repair of both sublethal and potentially lethal damage after radiation. These effects are augmented by the physiological conditions in tumor that lead to states of acidosis and hypoxia. Blood flow is often impaired in tumor relative to normal tissues, and HT may lead to a further decrease in blood flow and augment heat sensitivity. Three major areas of clinical investigation have borne the greatest fruit for HT as adjunctive therapy to RT. These include recurrent and primary breast lesions, melanoma, and head and neck neoplasms. Thermal enhancement ratio was increased in all cases and is approximately 1.4 for neck nodes, 1.5 for breast, and 2 for malignant melanoma. In general, the most important prognostic factors for complete response (CR) are RT dose, tumor size and minimal thermal parameters minimal thermal dose (t43min), mean minimal temperature (Tmin) or T90, i.e., temperature exceeded by 90% of thermal sensors]. The number of HT fractions administered per week appears to have no bearing on the overall response, which may be indicative of the effects of thermotolerance. The total number of HT fractions delivered also appears irrelevant provided adequate HT is delivered in one or two sessions. The major prognostic factors for the duration of local control were tumor histology, concurrent RT dose, tumor depth and Tmin. Although numerous single institution studies showed increased CR rates and improved local control, the efficacy of HT as an adjunct to RT should be assessed with well-designed multi-institutional randomized clinical trials. Such clinical trials are underway.

The potential role of HSP70 as an indicator of response to radiation and hyperthermia treatments for recurrent breast cancer

Twenty-three patients with recurrent breast cancer participating in a Phase III trial evaluating radiotherapy (XRT) with or without hyperthermia (HT) were included in a parallel study of heat shock protein (hsp) expression. The patients had core biopsies and/or fine needle aspirates (FNA) performed on their tumours, before and after treatment. These were analysed for hsp content using immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal antibody to the inducible form of hsp 70. The proportion of samples containing identifiable cancer cells was greater for the core biopsy specimens (80%) than with FNA (60%). Staining intensity was analysed using either the majority score, i.e. the staining intensity (on a relative scale from 0 to 3) for the largest proportion of tumour cells, or the arithmetic score, which is the sum of the product of percentage of tumour cells and their staining intensity. The staining intensity for hsp's after treatment correlated inversely with the probability of attaining a complete response (CR). Specifically, the median and maximum scores for the biopsy specimens were significantly inversely related to the probability of attaining CR. The results suggest that this technique may be useful in predicting for thermotolerance development, though more data is needed to confirm the utility of the technique. Results from this study corroborate data from other clinical studies which suggest that tumours with elevated hsp levels may demonstrate resistant biologic behaviour.

Thermotolerance in human glioma cells

Human glioma cells held in plateau phase were tested for the development of chronic and acute thermotolerance. Long duration, mild hyperthermia at 39-42 degrees C for up to 48 h showed no development of chronic thermotolerance. Heating at 45 degrees C immediately after mild hyperthermia showed that acute thermotolerance did develop for 40-42 degrees C heating. This thermotolerance developed at about the same rate for the three inducing temperatures (40-42 degrees C) but the decay characteristics were temperature dependent. In fact, for 42 degrees C heating thermosensitization to subsequent 45 degrees C heating was achieved after 48 h of heating. These data show that chronic and acute thermotolerance may be different in human glioma cells.

Prognostic factors for tumour response and skin damage to combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia in superficial recurrent breast carcinomas

Prognostic factors for complete tumour response and acute skin damage to combined hyperthermia and radiotherapy were analysed in material of patients with breast cancer, recurrent in previously irradiated areas. Radiotherapy was given daily to a total absorbed dose of 30.0 Gy in 2 weeks or 34.5 Gy in 3 weeks. The first radiotherapy schedule was combined with heat twice weekly, a total of four heat treatments (schedule A). The second radiotherapy schedule was combined with heat either once or twice a week resulting in a total of three (schedule B) or six (schedule C) heat treatments. Heat was induced with microwaves (2450, 915 or 434 MHz) via external applicators and always given after the radiotherapy fraction. The complete response (CR) rate in evaluable patients was 71% (49/69). There was no significant difference in CR rate between the three different hyperthermia schedules. The CR rates were 74% (14/19), 65% (15/23) and 74% (20/27) for schedules A, B and C respectively. The only factor predicting CR, evaluated both uni- and multivariately, was the CRE-value for the present radiotherapy dose (p = 0.02). If only tumours treated with 915 MHz were taken into account, however, then the highest minimum temperature at a given heat session predicted complete response (p = 0.03). This was true also in a multivariate analysis of this subgroup of tumours. A Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank test) showed no significant difference in duration of CR between the different treatment schedules. Cox's proportional hazards method revealed three significant factors: tumour size (negatively correlated, p = 0.007), the time interval between the diagnosis of the primary tumour and the present treatment (p = 0.02) and the average temperature (0.03). Maximum acute skin reactions in the treatment field were scored according to an ordinal scale of 0-8, modified after WHO 1979. Twenty-six treatment areas (32%) expressed more severe skin damage (score > or = 5) in terms of desquamation with blisters (14%) and necrosis or ulceration (19%). Factors correlated with skin damage were the size of the lesion area (p = 0.011), the highest average maximum temperature during a given heat session (p = 0.03) and the fractionation schedule of hyperthermia (p = 0.05). The extent of previous radiotherapy absorbed dose, previous surgery in the treated area or previous chemotherapy had no significant influence on the acute skin reactions.

Predictive factors for skin reactions in patients treated with thermoradiotherapy

In this study we performed univariate analyses to analyse the predictive factors for skin reactions, i.e. erythema, thermal blisters and ulceration, that occur during thermoradiotherapy. One hundred and twenty-six fields in 126 patients were treated with thermoradiotherapy using 915 MHz external microwave hyperthermia. Mean age of patients was 62 years. All but 11 lesions received previous therapy. Prior treatment included surgery (75%), chemotherapy (60%) and/or radiation therapy (51%). The mean previous radiation dose was 54 +/- 2 Gy. The concurrent tumour radiation dose was 45 +/- 1 Gy, in 16 fractions, over 35 elapsed days (dose per fraction of 1.6-4.8 Gy). The mean number of heat sessions administered was 5.5 +/- 0.2 (range 1-14). In 83% of cases hyperthermia was administered biweekly. Forty-two patients were treated without any skin reaction (33%), erythema occurred in 59 fields (47%), transient thermal blisters occurred in 25 fields (20%) and ulceration occurred in 23 fields (18%). In 25 cases, two or more skin reactions (20%) were observed concurrently. Concurrent radiation dose correlated with skin reactions (p = 0.02). The incidence of skin reactions was inversely correlated with previous radiation therapy (p = 0.04) and previous radiation therapy dose (p = 0.04) possibly due to fibrosis. None of the tumour or skin thermal parameters correlated with the reaction rate.

Multiple field hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the breast

Extensive recurrences on the chest wall of advanced carcinoma of the breast in 20 patients were treated with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy between 1987-1991. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, tumour response and complications of treating extensive lesions with multiple, overlapping fields of hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse encompassing up to 2900 cm2 in area with or without multiple nodules < or = 3 cm deep. All lesions had failed previous therapy with all but three failing previous radiotherapy. Hyperthermia consisted of 282 hyperthermia applicator fields and 357 hyperthermia treatments with external 915 MHz microwaves using commercially available applicators. Hyperthermia applicator fields were defined by the surface 50% SAR distribution of a particular applicator, and hyperthermia fields were abutted to cover the entire tumour bearing area. Radiation therapy consisted of 81 fields to a mean dose of 40 +/- 1 Gy (SE), 88% of fields received between 30 and 50 Gy. The equivalent dose was 42 +/- 1 Gy, based on the linear-quadratic model and alpha/beta = 25 (Fowler 1989). Overlapping hyperthermia fields were separated by an interval of at least three days. Up to four heat sessions per week were required to cover the entire tumour in a rotating fashion. The hyperthermia treatment time was 60 min. Hyperthermia treatments were continued for the duration of radiation therapy. Each hyperthermia applicator field was heated at least once. Patients were exposed to a mean of 14 +/- 3 hyperthermia applicator fields (range of 3-46 fields) and a mean of 18 +/- 3 hyperthermia treatments (range of 6-61) delivered over a mean of 7.5 +/- 0.9 weeks (range of 3-17 weeks). Each field was heated an average of 1.3 times. The tumour complete response rate was 95% with a recurrence rate of 5%. Nevertheless, the mean survival of patients with a complete response was only 10.8 +/- 1.7 months (range of 2-28 months) because of the systemic tumour burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patients. Neither complete response, local control nor survival after thermoradiotherapy correlated with the disease free interval between initial mastectomy and recurrence. There was no evidence of increased thermal damage to skin nor evidence of tumour recurrence at junctions of hyperthermia field overlap. It is concluded that recurrent advanced carcinoma of the breast presenting as extensive, diffuse lesions on the chest wall can be treated as effectively with multiple field patchwork thermoradiotherapy as can nodular lesions treated with single hyperthermia fields.

Thermotolerance and radiation sensitizing effects of long duration, mild temperature hyperthermia

Clinical application of long duration hyperthermia at temperatures < 42 degrees C has traditionally been avoided because of the possibility of chronic thermotolerance development, such as is observed with rodent cells. In support of long duration hyperthermia, both rodent and human cells have been shown to be sensitized to low dose-rate irradiation by simultaneous heating at 40 or 41 degrees C. The relationship between these supposed contradictory responses to hyperthermia were investigated in rat 9L gliosarcoma cells in vitro. Thermotolerance developed during 41 degrees C heating with or without concurrent low dose-rate irradiation. Thermotolerance reached a maximum within 6 h during 41 degrees C heating and remained stable for at least 24 h. When cells were returned to 37 degrees C after heating at 41 degrees C for 6 h, thermotolerance remained stable for at least 12 h. The time course of thermotolerance development correlated with that of induction of 41 degrees C radiation sensitization. Radiation sensitization, on the other hand, was shown to be independent of thermotolerance because the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide prevented thermotolerance induction but had no effect on radiation sensitization. We conclude that thermotolerance development during concurrent clinical application of long duration mild temperature hyperthermia and low dose-rate irradiation should not be a factor in altering treatment outcome.

Tumor extracellular pH as a prognostic factor in thermoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Tumor extracellular pH measurements in 26 human tumors were evaluated for the purpose of prognostic indication of response to thermoradiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-six patients (10 male, 16 female; mean age 62 years, range 18-89) were treated with external microwave hyperthermia (915 MHz) combined with radiation therapy. Tumor histologies included: 46% adenocarcinoma, 38% squamous cell carcinoma, 12% soft tissue sarcoma, and 4% malignant melanoma. The mean tumor depth was 1.6 +/- 0.2 cm (range 0.4-3 cm) and the mean tumor volume was 73 +/- 11 cm3 (range 1-192 cm3). The mean radiation dose administered concurrently with hyperthermia was 39 +/- 1 Gy (range 24-60 Gy, median of 40 Gy), in 15 fractions (range 8-25), over 32 elapsed days (range 15-43). The mean number of hyperthermia sessions administered was 5.4 +/- 0.5 (range 2-10). A battery operated pH meter and combination 21 ga recessed glass, beveled needle microelectrodes were used for tumor pH measurements. Calibration in pH buffers was performed before and after each pH measurement. The needle microelectrodes were 2.5 cm in length.

RESULTS

A complete response (CR) was obtained in 20 of 26 patients (77%) and a partial response in six (23%). The mean extracellular tumor pH was 6.88 +/- 0.09 in CR patients while it was 7.24 +/- 0.09 in noncompletely responding (NCR) patients (p = 0.08). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the probability of obtaining a complete response was influenced by the tumor volume (p = 0.02), tumor depth (p = 0.05), and extracellular tumor pH (p = 0.08). Lesions in the pH range of 6.00-6.40 and lesions in the pH range of 6.41-6.80 exhibited a CR rate of 100%, while those lesions in the pH range of 6.81-7.20 exhibited a CR of 90% and those in the pH range of 7.21-7.52 exhibited a CR of 50% (p = 0.002). In lesions with depth < or = 1.5 cm, the CR rate was 100% when the tumor pH was < 7.15 and 75% when the tumor pH was > or = 7.15. In lesions with depth between 1.5 and 3 cm, the CR rate was 66% when the tumor pH was < 7.15 and 43% when the tumor pH was > or = 7.15 (p = 0.02). In small tumors, that is, < or = 20 cm3, tumor pH increased with volume, whereas in larger tumors, that is, > 20 cm3, tumor pH decreased as a function of tumor volume.

CONCLUSION

Tumor extracellular pH may be useful as a prognostic indicator of tumor response to thermoradiotherapy.

Thermoradiotherapy for superficial tumour deposits in the head and neck

Tumour deposits in the head and neck region were treated with hyperthermia using 915 MHz external microwave applicators and radiation therapy between 1986 and 1990. The mean (+/- SE) radiation dose was 47 +/- 2 Gy (range 21-77 Gy). All but four patients had failed previous therapy. Mean tumour volume was 40 +/- 10 cm3 (range 0.3-276 cm3). Hyperthermia was administered biweekly in 80% of the patients in 6.0 +/- 0.4 sessions (range 1-10); thermometry involved 3.6 +/- 0.4 catheters (range 1-9) and 5.7 +/- 0.4 sensors (range 1-12) per tumour. Of the 50 lesions evaluable for response, 29 had a complete response (58%), and 20 had a partial response (40%). Lesions were stratified by depth. In tumours considered potentially heatable (i.e. depth < or = 3 cm and lateral dimensions at least 2 cm less than boundary of applicator), the complete response rate was 81% (26/32, 47 +/- 2 Gy, 15 +/- 3 cm3); whereas for patients with tumours deeper than 3 cm, the complete response rate was 17% (3/18, 48 +/- 3 Gy, 110 +/- 21 cm3), p = 0.0001. Among lesions < or = 3 cm depth that exhibited a complete response, six recurred (24%, 5.8 +/- 1.8 months) while 20 lesions were recurrence free at last follow-up of 11.9 +/- 1.2 months). The overall survival of patients with lesions < or = 3 cm depth was 11.5 +/- 1.3 months (range 2.4-32.3 months) while for patients with lesions > 3 cm depth survival was 6.7 +/- 0.9 months (range 2.1-18.6 months), p = 0.01. In superficial lesions with depth < or = 3 cm, multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the model best correlating with complete response included radiation dose (p = 0.08) and tumour volume (p = 0.08, model p = 0.004). Multivariate proportional hazard analysis indicated that the model best correlating with duration of local control included tumour depth (p = 0.03) and previous radiation therapy (p = 0.08, model p = 0.006). Twenty-two fields were treated without any skin reactions (39%), 23 evidenced erythema (40%) and eight thermal blistering (14%). Ulceration occurred in 11 treatment fields but in all but one of these cases the ulceration may have been due to tumour breakdown as there was direct invasion of the skin by tumour prior to the initiation of treatment. The maximal skin temperature was the best predictor of morbidity although the correlation was not statistically significant (p = 0.19).