1
|
Watter K, Murray A, McLennan V, Vogler J, Jeffery S, Ehlers S, Nielsen M, Kennedy A. A framework to support early team-based provision of vocational rehabilitation for adults with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:3176-3188. [PMID: 37525931 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2239162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Specialised vocational rehabilitation (VR) following acquired brain injury (ABI) positively impacts return to work, however access to this is limited globally. Providing VR as a component of standard ABI rehabilitation may improve access to VR and influence vocational outcomes. This study aimed to develop an evidence-based framework for the delivery of ABI VR during early transitional community rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The development of the ABI VR framework utilised an emergent multi-phase design and was informed by models of evidence-based practice, national rehabilitation standards, guidelines for complex intervention development, model of care and framework development, and the knowledge-to-action framework. Four study phases were undertaken to identify and generate the evidence base, with findings synthesised to develop the ABI VR framework in phase five. RESULTS The framework provides a structure for the systematic delivery of VR as a component of team-based ABI rehabilitation, through five phases of rehabilitation: assessment; goal setting and rehabilitation planning; intervention; monitoring and evaluation; and discharge. It details the activities to be undertaken across the phases using a hybrid model of ABI VR (involving program-based VR and case coordination) and contains service delivery features. CONCLUSION The framework has the potential to translate to other similar service contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerrin Watter
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
- Menzies Institute and School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
| | - Alena Murray
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
| | - Vanette McLennan
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
- Menzies Institute and School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
| | - Jessica Vogler
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sarah Jeffery
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shelley Ehlers
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mandy Nielsen
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
- Menzies Institute and School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
| | - Areti Kennedy
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
- Menzies Institute and School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kurihara R, Nagao T, Tanemura R. Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study. Hong Kong J Occup Ther 2024; 37:10-20. [PMID: 38912099 PMCID: PMC11192432 DOI: 10.1177/15691861231225754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Ensuring effective return to work following acquired brain injuries is crucial from the perspectives of both quality of life and the economy. However, techniques of occupational therapy support for return to work remain relatively unelucidated. Aims/Objectives To clarify the specific contents of occupational therapy required for work and work support for clients with acquired brain injuries. Material and Methods An interview-based survey was conducted with participants who had >10 years of occupational therapy experience and had provided work support. We selected participants via snowball sampling. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results A total of 20 participants (15 women and 5 men; 6, 12, 1, and 1 in their 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s, respectively) were included. Six concepts were generated on reviewing the support for work items considered important by the occupational therapist as follows: "Support for vocational life," "Support for interpersonal skills," "Support for work," "Support for illness, disability, and awareness," "Support for utilization of compensation measures," and "Support for goal setting." Conclusions We clarified the specific contents of work support, including support for vocational life and support for work, that is administered by occupational therapists who provide work support for clients with acquired brain injury. The insights from the study improve understanding of OTs' roles and contributions in supporting clients with acquired brain injuries in returning to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoko Kurihara
- Teikyo Heisei University, Japan
- Doctoral Program, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watter K, Murray A, McLennan V, Vogler J, Ehlers S, Jeffery S, Nielsen M, Kennedy A. Clinician perspectives of ABI vocational rehabilitation in Queensland. BRAIN IMPAIR 2023; 24:371-394. [PMID: 38167193 DOI: 10.1017/brimp.2023.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Services to support adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) and return to work goals are varied. In Queensland, Australia, return to work goals may be addressed through private or publicly funded rehabilitation services or through publicly funded employment programs. No set frameworks or processes are in place to guide clinicians in providing vocational rehabilitation to adults with ABI, and the extent to which services address clients' vocational goals and/or provide vocational rehabilitation is unknown. METHOD This qualitative study investigated the clinical practice and experiences of allied health rehabilitation clinicians (n = 34) to identify current practice in providing vocational rehabilitation to adults with ABI, including pathways and services; models, frameworks and tools; and recommendations for ideal services. Focus groups and online surveys were conducted, with data analysed via content analysis. RESULTS ABI vocational rehabilitation was inconsistently delivered within and across services in Queensland, with differences in access to services, aspects of vocational rehabilitation provided and timeframes for rehabilitation. Five key themes were identified regarding ABI vocational rehabilitation and service delivery in Queensland: Factors influencing ABI and return to work; Service provision; ABI vocational rehabilitation processes (including assessment tools and interventions); Service gaps; and Ideal ABI vocational rehabilitation services. DISCUSSION These findings can inform clinical practice and development, and current and future service delivery models for ABI vocational rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerrin Watter
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, QLD, Australia
| | - Alena Murray
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, QLD, Australia
| | - Vanette McLennan
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, QLD, Australia
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, QLD, Australia
| | - Jessica Vogler
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shelley Ehlers
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sarah Jeffery
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mandy Nielsen
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, QLD, Australia
| | - Areti Kennedy
- Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health and Menzies Institute, Griffith University, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spjelkavik Ø, Enehaug H, Klethagen P, Howe EI, Fure SC, Terjesen HCA, Løvstad M, Andelic N. Workplace accommodation in return to work after mild traumatic brain injury. Work 2022; 74:1149-1163. [PMID: 36442182 DOI: 10.3233/wor-211440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While a vast amount of research focuses on unmodifiable and individual factors that may impact return to work (RTW) for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), less knowledge exists of the relationship between specific workplace factors and work retention. OBJECTIVE: Identify types of accommodation in the workplace that influence the RTW process for employees with TBI and the challenges associated with them. METHODS: A multiple case study consisting of 38 cases and 109 interviews of employees with TBI and their managers conducted between 2017 and 2020 at two time points. RESULTS: Accommodation of both the organizational and psychosocial work environment influences RTW for employees with TBI. Social support and supportive management may have positive and negative effects. RTW is often not a linear process. Over time, maintaining and developing customized accommodation in the work organization is challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty about accommodation in RTW for employees with TBI is closely linked to lack of knowledge in the workplace of how to handle complex and nonlinear RTW processes. Work-oriented rehabilitation should to a greater extent provide managers with relevant information and support to develop the person-environment fit over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heidi Enehaug
- Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Klethagen
- Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C.R. Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li W, Wolbring G. Analysis of engagement between ethics and return-to-work discourses in respective academic literature. Work 2019; 64:3-19. [PMID: 31450533 DOI: 10.3233/wor-192973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Return-to-work (RTW)/back-to-work (BTW) interventions that are designed to rehabilitate individuals impaired from fulfilling employment roles are facing challenges. Ethics discourses, including ethics theories, principles and concepts, are meant to give guidance on what one ought to do or not to do and RTW professionals could use them to respond to their challenges. OBJECTIVE A scoping review was performed to investigate to what extent 33 ethics concepts, theories, and principles are employed in RTW/BTW academic literature, and to what extent RTW/BTW is engaged with in ethics linked academic journals. METHODS Three academic databases were searched, and 147 article results were extracted from our literature review to be thematically analyzed. RESULTS Searches with n = 11 ethics concepts and n = 4 ethics theories generated results. The content of 20 RTW/BTW article results demonstrated conceptual engagement between RTW and ethics discourses. Only one article in ethics-related journals conceptually engaged with RTW/BTW. CONCLUSION Ethics theories and principles were not used extensively in RTW/BTW academic literature and RTW/BTW is a topic under-engaged within ethics-related journals. Our findings indicate opportunities for further research, like conducting interviews, to better understand our findings and how to respond to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Li
- Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregor Wolbring
- Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matérne M, Lundqvist LO, Strandberg T. Opportunities and barriers for successful return to work after acquired brain injury: A patient perspective. Work 2017; 56:125-134. [PMID: 28035941 PMCID: PMC5302032 DOI: 10.3233/wor-162468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many people who suffer an acquired brain injury (ABI) are of working age. There are benefits, for the patient, the workplace, and society, to finding factors that facilitate successful return to work (RTW). OBJECTIVE: The aim was to increase knowledge of opportunities and barriers for a successful RTW in patients with ABI. METHOD: Five men and five women with ABI participated. All had successfully returned to work at least 20 hours a week. Their experiences were gathered by semi-structured interviews, which were subsequently subjected to qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Three themes that influenced RTW were identified: individually adapted rehabilitation; motivation for RTW; and cognitive and social abilities. An individually adapted rehabilitation was judged important because the patients were involved in their own rehabilitation and required individually adapted support from rehabilitation specialists, employers, and colleagues. A moderate level of motivation for RTW was needed. Awareness of the person’s cognitive and social abilities is essential, in finding compensatory strategies and adaptations. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that the vocational rehabilitation process is a balancing act in individualized planning and support, as a partnership with the employer needs to be developed, motivation needs to be generated, and awareness built of abilities that facilitate or hinder RTW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Matérne
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Lars-Olov Lundqvist
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Thomas Strandberg
- School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frostad Liaset I, Lorås H. Perceived factors in return to work after acquired brain injury: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Scand J Occup Ther 2016; 23:446-57. [PMID: 26950822 DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2016.1152294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A substantial proportion of survivors after brain injuries originating from trauma, tumour, or stroke may experience reduced ability to work due to a number of challenges. The purpose of this review is to summarize and highlight factors that have been perceived and reported as important in order to return to work after an acquired brain injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS A qualitative ethnographic meta-synthesis is used to interpret and develop concepts from studies retrieved from systematic searches in the electronic databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and ISI Web of Science. RESULTS A total of 16 studies were included in the meta-synthesis. Four key concepts were identified as important for return to work after an acquired brain injury: empowerment, self-awareness, motivation, and facilitation. CONCLUSION The results of the meta-synthesis indicate that personal development is experienced as essential in order to return to work after an acquired brain injury, involving identification of each individual's strengths and weaknesses. These personal factors intersect with an emphasis of the employer providing a certain degree of facilitation in the workplace. All of these aspects will affect one's motivation to return to work and can therefore be crucial to succeed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingeborg Frostad Liaset
- a Faculty of Health Education and Social Work, Department of Physiotherapy and Department of Occupational Therapy , Sør-Trøndelag University College , Trondheim , Norway
| | - Håvard Lorås
- a Faculty of Health Education and Social Work, Department of Physiotherapy and Department of Occupational Therapy , Sør-Trøndelag University College , Trondheim , Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Dawson D, Bottari C, Hebert D. Do current vocational evaluation practices in traumatic brain injury align with best practices? Strengths, challenges and recommendations. Br J Occup Ther 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/0308022616631759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction To support implementation of the Inter-professional Guideline for Vocational Evaluation Following Traumatic Brain Injury we compared current practices to best practices as outlined in the guideline. Method We recruited health/vocational professionals who do vocational evaluation of traumatic brain injury survivors to participate in qualitative semi-structured interviews. We also conducted a document review of internal clinical and provincial workers’ compensation insurance documents. All data were analyzed using directed content analysis. Results Thirteen individuals participated and three types of documents were reviewed. Practices that were found to be frequently aligned with the Inter-professional Guideline for Vocational Evaluation Following Traumatic Brain Injury included: (a) identification of evaluation purpose; (b) obtaining informed consent; (c) gathering background information; (d) assessing persistent symptoms and abilities; (e) analyzing and synthesizing results; and (f) developing return to work recommendations. Practices partially aligned included: (a) incorporating the worker’s perspectives into the evaluation; (b) observing work behaviors in naturalistic settings (c) assessing available supports; and (d) assessing occupational/job demands in context. Practices that did not align with the guideline included: (a) evaluation of the workplace environment and workplace supports; (b) accommodation potential; and (c) assessment of workplace safety. Conclusion To support implementation of the guideline and enhance successful vocational outcomes, additional attention and resources should be dedicated to evaluating workplace-based factors and assessing workplace-based risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Stergiou-Kita
- Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto; Affiliate Scientist, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto; Adjunct Scientist, Institute of Work & Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alisa Grigorovich
- Senior Research Associate, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Deirdre Dawson
- Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, & Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto; Senior Scientist, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carolina Bottari
- Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal; Researcher, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Canada
| | - Debbie Hebert
- Practice Lead and Rocket Family Upper Extremity Clinic Lead, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network Toronto; Associate Professor, University of Toronto Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dillahunt-Aspillaga C, Jorgensen Smith T, Hanson A, Ehlke S, Stergiou-Kita M, Dixon CG, Quichocho D. Exploring Vocational Evaluation Practices following Traumatic Brain Injury. Behav Neurol 2015; 2015:924027. [PMID: 26494945 PMCID: PMC4606095 DOI: 10.1155/2015/924027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2015] [Revised: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) face many challenges when attempting to return to work (RTW). Vocational evaluation (VE) is a systematic process that involves assessment and appraisal of an individual's current work-related characteristics and abilities. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study are to (1) examine demographic and employment characteristics of vocational rehabilitation providers (VRPs), (2) identify the specific evaluation methods that are used in the VE of individuals with TBI, and (3) examine the differences in assessment method practices based upon evaluator assessment preferences. METHODS This exploratory case study used a forty-six-item online survey which was distributed to VRPs. RESULTS One hundred and nine VRPs accessed the survey. Of these, 74 completed the survey. A majority of respondents were female (79.7%), Caucasian (71.6%), and holding a master's degree (74.3%), and more than half (56.8%) were employed as state vocational rehabilitation counselors (VRCs). In addition, over two-thirds (67.6%) were certified rehabilitation counselors (CRCs). Respondents reported using several specific tools and assessments during the VE process. CONCLUSIONS Study findings reveal differences in use of and rationales for specific assessments amongst VRPs. Understanding VRP assessment practices and use of an evidence-based framework for VE following TBI may inform and improve VE practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga
- Department of Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, MHC 1632, Tampa, FL 33612-3807, USA
| | - Tammy Jorgensen Smith
- Department of Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, MHC 1632, Tampa, FL 33612-3807, USA
| | - Ardis Hanson
- College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, MHC 1139, Tampa, FL 33612-3807, USA
| | - Sarah Ehlke
- American Legacy Foundation, 1724 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA
| | - Mary Stergiou-Kita
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1V7
| | - Charlotte G. Dixon
- C.G. Dixon & Associates Inc., 42 S. Ingram Street, Alexandria, VA 22304, USA
| | - Davina Quichocho
- Department of Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, MHC 1632, Tampa, FL 33612-3807, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the development and results of a detailed survey on return to work (RTW) after stroke completed by survivors at various stages of recovery. METHOD This study used a multi-method qualitative and quantitative research strategy to design and implement a 39-item survey for stroke survivors. Individual interviews, focus groups, and working committees were used to conceptualize the issues and translate them into a survey format. Surveys were distributed in regular and electronic mail. Groups of rehabilitation professionals, employers, and stroke survivors were assembled to review findings and obtain feedback to aide in interpretation. RESULTS Overall 715 surveys were completed. The respondents were on average 54 years of age, mostly white, well-educated, urban dwelling, and in skilled occupations. Results are described in seven areas: financial, stroke impairments, organizational, work and psychological issues, interpersonal support, and therapy. Several salient findings are described including the role of fatigue, under utilization of vocational rehabilitation (VR) services, and motivational factors related to finances, self-esteem, work, and workplace relationships. CONCLUSION Although earning an income is a strong motivation to RTW, salary decreases in importance when compared with other psychological benefits. Fatigue was rated as the second highest impairment barrier to RTW and persisted as a relevant impediment over time. Attitudes of co-workers and flexibility in work schedule were viewed as most helpful to the RTW process, whereas work stress was viewed as the greatest impediment to return. Only 24% of the sample received VR counseling with more respondents receiving counseling if they returned 6 months or longer after their stroke. Other trends and clinical and research implications are discussed.
Collapse
|
11
|
Systematic Review of Return to Work After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95:S201-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2013] [Revised: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 10/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
12
|
MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Lippel K, Neilson C, Franche RL, Pugliese D. The ideal of consumer choice in social services: challenges with implementation in an Ontario injured worker vocational retraining programme. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35:2171-9. [DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.771704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
13
|
Glässel A, Finger ME, Cieza A, Treitler C, Coenen M, Escorpizo R. Vocational rehabilitation from the client's perspective using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2011; 21:167-178. [PMID: 21258850 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-010-9277-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative), multicenter study was conducted using a focus group design to explore the lived experiences of persons in vocational rehabilitation (VR) with regard to functioning and contextual factors using six open-ended questions related to the ICF components. The results were classified by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a frame of reference. METHODS The meaningful concepts within the transcribed data were identified and linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules. RESULTS The seven focus groups with 26 participants yielded a total of 4,813 relevant concepts which were linked to a total of 160 different second-level ICF categories. From the client perspective, the ICF components (a) body functions, (b) activities and participation and (c) environmental factors were equally represented, while (d) body structures appeared less frequently. Out of the total number of concepts, 864 concepts (18%) were assigned to the ICF component personal factors which is not yet classified but could indicate important aspects of resource management and strategy development of patients in VR. CONCLUSION Therefore, VR of patients must not be limited to anatomical and pathophysiologic changes, but should also consider a more comprehensive view which includes client's demands, strategies and resources in daily life and the context around the individual and social circumstances of their work situation.
Collapse
|