The safety and efficacy of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing postoperative seizures in adult patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis

Objective

Seizures are one of the most common symptoms in patients with brain tumor. The efficacy of prophylactic antiepileptic agents in reducing postoperative seizures in patients with brain tumor remains disputed. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing seizures in adult patients with brain tumor.

Review methods

We gathered studies comparing the effectiveness of levetiracetam with other antiepileptic drugs in preventing postoperative seizures in individuals with brain tumor from 2008 to 2023. We used the search terms levetiracetam, brain tumor, prevention, and seizures to retrieve relevant studies from the Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMav 5.3 software.

Results

After the literature search and screening, nine English-language studies involving a total of 2,433 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed that levetiracetam had higher efficacy for preventing overall seizures than the control intervention (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.71, p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam was superior to that of sodium valproate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.72, p < 0.0001) and phenytoin sodium (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.62, p = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in the efficacy of early seizure prophylaxis (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15-2.04, p = 0.37) was observed. The subgroup analysis revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam for preventing early seizures was better than that of phenytion sodium (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.56, p = 0.006). No statistically significant difference was noted in the preventive efficacy against late seizures (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.27-2.03, p = 0.57). The incidence of adverse drug reactions was lower in the levetiracetam group than in the control group (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.64, p = 0.008). Further subgroup analyses revealed that the incidence of adverse drug reactions in the levetiracetam group was lower than that in the phenytion sodium group (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.21, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Prophylactic levetiracetam decreases the frequency of postoperative seizures, particularly early postoperative seizures, in individuals with brain tumor, with superior effectiveness to phenytion sodium and sodium valproate. In addition, levetiracetam induced only minor adverse effects, with a lower occurrence rate of adverse reactions than phenytion sodium and valproate. Nevertheless, a potential for bias exists. Due to the limited number of high-quality randomized controlled trials included in this meta-analysis, prospective, multicenter, ethnically diverse, high-quality studies on levetiracetam are essential to determine the efficacy of preventive levetiracetam in managing postoperative seizures.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-6-0091/.

Development of individualized risk assessment models for predicting post-traumatic epilepsy 1 and 2 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A traumatic brain injury model system study

OBJECTIVE

Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are common, there are no prospective models quantifying individual epilepsy risk after moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI). We generated parsimonious prediction models to quantify individual epilepsy risk between acute inpatient rehabilitation for individuals 2 years after msTBI.

METHODS

We used data from 6089 prospectively enrolled participants (≥16 years) in the TBI Model Systems National Database. Of these, 4126 individuals had complete seizure data collected over a 2-year period post-injury. We performed a case-complete analysis to generate multiple prediction models using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Baseline predictors were used to assess 2-year seizure risk (Model 1). Then a 2-year seizure risk was assessed excluding the acute care variables (Model 2). In addition, we generated prognostic models predicting new/recurrent seizures during Year 2 post-msTBI (Model 3) and predicting new seizures only during Year 2 (Model 4). We assessed model sensitivity when keeping specificity ≥.60, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and AUROC model performance through 5-fold cross-validation (CV).

RESULTS

Model 1 (73.8% men, 44.1 ± 19.7 years, 76.1% moderate TBI) had a model sensitivity = 76.00% and average AUROC = .73 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 2 had a model sensitivity = 72.16% and average AUROC = .70 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 3 had a sensitivity = 86.63% and average AUROC = .84 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Model 4 had a sensitivity = 73.68% and average AUROC = .67 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Cranial surgeries, acute care seizures, intracranial fragments, and traumatic hemorrhages were consistent predictors across all models. Demographic and mental health variables contributed to some models. Simulated, clinical examples model individual PTE predictions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using information available, acute-care, and year-1 post-injury data, parsimonious quantitative epilepsy prediction models following msTBI may facilitate timely evidence-based PTE prognostication within a 2-year period. We developed interactive web-based tools for testing prediction model external validity among independent cohorts. Individualized PTE risk may inform clinical trial development/design and clinical decision support tools for this population.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam for Prophylaxis of Early Post-Traumatic Seizures: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Study

Introduction  Early posttraumatic seizures (EPTS) are a major complication after a head injury, defined as seizures developing within the first 7 days of trauma. Levetiracetam has become a popular drug for the prevention of posttraumatic seizures in institutions worldwide. However, it has been reportedly associated with adverse effects like behavioral changes and somnolence. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a newer drug, brivaracetam, which is reported to have a better pharmacokinetic profile. These findings may be significant in providing a safer yet efficacious alternative to levetiracetam. Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of brivaracetam for prophylaxis of EPTS and to compare it with levetiracetam. Materials and Methods  A prospective, single-blind, parallel-group (alternate allocation) controlled trial over 100 patients admitted with traumatic brain injury in the Department of Neurosurgery, Goa Medical College, Panaji, Goa, India. The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0. Results  Twenty patients developed EPTS in the study group: 8 from the group receiving brivaracetam and 12 from the group receiving levetiracetam. Although the brivaracetam group had a lower incidence of EPTS, the difference was not statistically significant. Eleven patients from the levetiracetam group developed side effects, while six patients from the brivaracetam group had side effects. There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects. Conclusion  Brivaracetam has efficacy equal to that of levetiracetam for prophylaxis of EPTS.

Clinical Management in Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and is one of the major public healthcare burdens in the US, with millions of patients suffering from the traumatic brain injury itself (approximately 1.6 million/year) or its repercussions (2-6 million patients with disabilities). The severity of traumatic brain injury can range from mild transient neurological dysfunction or impairment to severe profound disability that leaves patients completely non-functional. Indications for treatment differ based on the injury's severity, but one of the goals of early treatment is to prevent secondary brain injury. Hemodynamic stability, monitoring and treatment of intracranial pressure, maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure, support of adequate oxygenation and ventilation, administration of hyperosmolar agents and/or sedatives, nutritional support, and seizure prophylaxis are the mainstays of medical treatment for severe traumatic brain injury. Surgical management options include decompressive craniectomy or cerebrospinal fluid drainage via the insertion of an external ventricular drain. Several emerging treatment modalities are being investigated, such as anti-excitotoxic agents, anti-ischemic and cerebral dysregulation agents, S100B protein, erythropoietin, endogenous neuroprotectors, anti-inflammatory agents, and stem cell and neuronal restoration agents, among others.

Seizure Prophylaxis in Young Patients Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Introduction

Phenytoin is one of the commonly used anti.seizure medications in nontraumatic seizures. However, its utility and safety in young patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) for the prevention of early-onset seizures (EOS) are debatable. We sought to explore the use of phenytoin as a seizure prophylaxis following TBI. We hypothesized that administering phenytoin is not effective in preventing EOS after TBI.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study conducted on adult TBI patients. EOS was defined as a witnessed seizure within a week postinjury. Data were compared as phenytoin versus no-phenytoin use, EOS versus no-EOS, and among TBI severity groups.

Results

During 1 year, 639 TBI patients were included with a mean age of 32 years; of them, 183 received phenytoin as seizure prophylaxis, and 453 received no prophylaxis medication. EOS was documented in 13 (2.0%) patients who received phenytoin, and none had EOS among the nonphenytoin group. The phenytoin group was more likely to have a higher Marshall Score (P = 0.001), lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (P = 0.001), EOS (P = 0.001), and higher mortality (P = 0.001). Phenytoin was administrated for 15.2%, 43.2%, and 64.5% of mild, moderate, and severe TBI patients, respectively. EOS and no-EOS groups were comparable for age, gender, mechanism of injury, GCS, Marshall Score, serum phenytoin levels, liver function levels, hospital stay, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that low serum albumin (odds ratio [OR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.676.0.962) and toxic phenytoin level (OR 43; 95% CI 2.420.780.7) were independent predictors of EOS.

Conclusions

In this study, the prophylactic use of phenytoin in TBI was ineffective in preventing EOS. Large-scale matched studies and well-defined hospital protocols are needed for the proper utility of phenytoin post-TBI.

Use of Levetiracetam for Post-Traumatic Seizure Prophylaxis in Combat-Related Traumatic Brain Injury

INTRODUCTION

Post-traumatic seizure (PTS) prophylaxis is recommended in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at high risk for PTSs, but consensus on the optimal pharmacologic therapy has not yet been established. Levetiracetam is frequently used for seizure prophylaxis in combat-related TBI, but its efficacy and safety in this patient population has not yet been described.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 687 consecutive casualties transferred to the CONUS from October 2010 to December 2015 was analyzed. Seventy-one patients with combat-related injuries and radiographic evidence of skull fractures or intracranial hemorrhage were included. Data collection included demographics and injury characteristics including initial Glasgow Coma Scale, computed tomography findings, interventions, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Score.

RESULTS

All patients in this cohort were male, with an average age of 25 (median 24; Interquartile range (IQR) 4.5) and an average Injury Severity Score of 28 (median 27; IQR 15). The most common mechanism of injury was explosive blast (76%). Penetrating TBI was common (51%). Most patients (88.7%) were administered seizure prophylaxis. Of these, the majority (61/63) received levetiracetam, and the additional two were administered phenytoin. The remaining 11.3% of patients were deemed not to require seizure prophylaxis. The incidence of seizures while on prophylaxis was low (2.8%) and occurred in patients who suffered transcranial gunshot wounds and ultimately died. No serious adverse effects were attributed to levetiracetam.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam appears to be a safe and effective medication for PTS prophylaxis in combat casualties. The rate of PTSs in combat-related TBI on appropriate prophylaxis is low.

Peritoneal dialysis in the setting of acute brain injury: an underappreciated modality

INTRODUCTION

Dialysis is complicated in the setting of acute brain injury (ABI) due to several factors including acute solute shifts, acid base changes, need for anticoagulation, and changes in intracranial pressure. For these reasons, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often the chosen modality for renal replacement needs in these patients. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is less discussed but shares many of the benefits often attributed to CRRT. We describe, from both nephrology and neurosurgical perspectives, a case successfully managed with PD.

CASE

A 25-year-old male with history of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) secondary to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis on continuous cycling PD for 5 years presented to the hospital with headache and altered mental status. Initial imaging revealed a large intraventricular hemorrhage extending to the fourth ventricle. He underwent an emergent right depressive hemicraniectomy and clot evacuation. Post-operative imaging revealed worsening cerebral edema, intraventricular hemorrhage, and hydrocephalus. The decision was made to continue PD, noting that it retains many of the benefits of CRRT (which it is in fact, a form of) which he tolerated well until the need for a percutaneous gastrostomy tube arose. He was transiently transitioned to hemodialysis but returned to PD once his gastrostomy healed. He continued PD for 1 year without complication and eventually received a kidney transplant.

DISCUSSION

In managing patients with ABI undergoing dialysis, a number of considerations must be undertaken including avoidance of hypotension to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure and minimize ischemia reperfusion injury, avoidance of anticoagulants that can precipitate or worsen bleeding, the potential for cerebral edema due to rapid solute clearance and osmotic dissipation of therapeutic hypernatremia, and the mitigation of intracellular acidosis from bicarbonate delivery. Although underutilized, PD may potentially serve as a viable option for dialysis in the setting of ABI as demonstrated by the case presented.

Discontinuation of Levetiracetam and Valproic Acid Due to Adverse Effects in Early Post-traumatic Seizure Prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam (LEV) and valproic acid (VPA) are two anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) routinely used for post-traumatic seizure (PTS) prophylaxis at our institution. In our practice, VPA is used for its beneficial effects on behavioral agitation and headaches, but it is also associated with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs). Both medications may be associated with thrombocytopenia. There is less literature comparing the adverse effect profiles and discontinuation rates of LEV and VPA in the context of PTS prophylaxis. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) analysis to determine the safety of LEV and VPA for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients at our institution. In particular, our QI analysis involved calculating the rates of discontinuation or change of drug regimen due to the adverse effects.

METHODS

Our QI analysis focused on patients treated for TBI at our institution during a six-year period. We recorded the AED used and if the AED was discontinued or switched due to thrombocytopenia, behavioral agitation, headaches, or elevated LFTs (including elevated aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase values). We also recorded the incidence of early PTS, defined as seizures within seven days of the TBI.

RESULTS

Our QI analysis included patients with a mean age of approximately 49 years with nearly 75% males. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 12.88, with 73.11% of patients having a mild GCS. The three leading injury mechanisms were fall, assault, and motor vehicle collision. The three leading types of TBI were traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and cerebral contusion. Among patients with no prior history of seizures, we found an early PTS incidence of 7.28%. For patients administered LEV and VPA, 0.11% (1/898) and 3.85% (4/104) had the medication discontinued or changed because of thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001), respectively. For patients on LEV, 4.01% (36/898) and 1.78% (16/898) had the medication discontinued or changed because of behavioral agitation and headaches, respectively. For patients on VPA, 2.88% (3/104) had the medication discontinued or changed because of hepatotoxicity. In total, 5.90% versus 6.73% (p > 0.5) of patients on LEV and VPA, respectively, had their medication regimens changed due to the adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of early PTS in our patients is within the range of what has been reported in the literature. The rate of discontinuation of LEV and VPA on account of adverse events is low in the context of PTS prophylaxis. Both medications had similar overall rates of discontinuation. VPA was discontinued more frequently than LEV due to thrombocytopenia, but discontinuation was not common in either case. LEV is associated with behavioral agitation and headaches, which makes VPA a desirable alternative for patients suffering from these symptoms.

Use of antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis against posttraumatic seizures in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We aim to assess the effect of anti-epileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis for early or late posttraumatic seizures, targeting the pediatric population with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We systematically searched for studies reporting the incidence of posttraumatic seizures in pediatric patients who suffered from TBI and received AEDs prophylactically following their TBI incident. Studies that included adult patients, adult and pediatric patients but did not report results for the pediatric population separately, and patients who did not suffer from a TBI were excluded. Studies that did not indicate the use of antiepileptic drugs prophylactically following TBI were excluded. A total of 10 studies were included involving 4621 posttraumatic brain injury patients of the pediatric age population (<18). Five studies assessed the effect of prophylaxis on early seizures, four on late seizures and one on any seizure. The mean incidence of posttraumatic seizures with AED prophylaxis was 8% for early seizures and 7.1% for late seizures. Moreover, one study revealed no benefit of AED prophylaxis for early posttraumatic seizures. Meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of early posttraumatic seizures with antiepileptic prophylaxis. However, no significant difference for late posttraumatic seizures has been shown. In conclusion, AED prophylaxis seems to be effective against early posttraumatic seizures for the pediatric population, with levetiracetam possibly being more effective. Also, there is no observed benefit for late posttraumatic seizures.

INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Methods, Overview, and Principles

INTRODUCTION

Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in complex cognitive sequelae. Despite hundreds of clinical trials in cognitive rehabilitation, the translation of these findings into clinical practice remains a challenge. Clinical practice guidelines are one solution. The objective of this initiative was to reconvene the international group of cognitive researchers and clinicians (known as INCOG) to develop INCOG 2.0: Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following TBI.

METHODS

The guidelines adaptation and development cycle was used to update the recommendations and derive new ones. The team met virtually and reviewed the literature published since the original INCOG (2014) to update the recommendations and decision algorithms. The team then prioritized the recommendations for implementation and modified the audit tool accordingly to allow for the evaluation of adherence to best practices.

RESULTS

In total, the INCOG update contains 80 recommendations (25 level A, 15 level B, and 40 level C) of which 27 are new. Recommendations developed for posttraumatic amnesia, attention, memory, executive function and cognitive-communication are outlined in other articles, whereas this article focuses on the overarching principles of care for which there are 38 recommendations pertaining to: assessment (10 recommendations), principles of cognitive rehabilitation (6 recommendations), medications to enhance cognition (10 recommendations), teleassessment (5 recommendations), and telerehabilitation intervention (7 recommendations). One recommendation was supported by level A evidence, 7 by level B evidence, and all remaining recommendations were level C evidence. New to INCOG are recommendations for telehealth-delivered cognitive assessment and rehabilitation. Evidence-based clinical algorithms and audit tools for evaluating the state of current practice are also provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation guided by these recommendations should be offered to individuals with TBI. Despite the advancements in TBI rehabilitation research, further high-quality studies are needed to better understand the role of cognitive rehabilitation in improving patient outcomes after TBI.

Initial neurocritical care of severe traumatic brain injury: New paradigms and old challenges

Background:

Early neurocritical care aims to ameliorate secondary traumatic brain injury (TBI) and improve neural salvage. Increased engagement of neurosurgeons in neurocritical care is warranted as daily briefings between the intensivist and the neurosurgeon are considered a quality indicator for TBI care. Hence, neurosurgeons should be aware of the latest evidence in the neurocritical care of severe TBI (sTBI).

Methods:

We conducted a narrative literature review of bibliographic databases (PubMed and Scopus) to examine recent research of sTBI.

Results:

This review has several take-away messages. The concept of critical neuroworsening and its possible causes is discussed. Static thresholds of intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure may not be optimal for all patients. The use of dynamic cerebrovascular reactivity indices such as the pressure reactivity index can facilitate individualized treatment decisions. The use of ICP monitoring to tailor treatment of intracranial hypertension (IHT) is not routinely feasible. Different guidelines have been formulated for different scenarios. Accordingly, we propose an integrated algorithm for ICP management in sTBI patients in different resource settings. Although hyperosmolar therapy and decompressive craniectomy are standard treatments for IHT, there is a lack high-quality evidence on how to use them. A discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of invasive ICP monitoring is included in the study. Addition of beta-blocker, anti-seizure, and anticoagulant medications to standardized management protocols (SMPs) should be considered with careful patient selection.

Conclusion:

Despite consolidated research efforts in the refinement of SMPs, there are still many unanswered questions and novel research opportunities for sTBI care.

Effectiveness of antiseizure medications therapy in preventing seizures in brain injury patients: A network meta-analysis

Purpose: To explore the effectiveness of different anti-seizure medications in preventing early and late post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE). The efficacy, treatment-related side-effects, and mortality of the different treatments were compared using a ranking model to identify the optimal treatment.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases. All relevant published articles up to 10 March 2022 were evaluated. The quality of the extracted data was assessed using either the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome measures were early or late post-traumatic seizures. The secondary outcome measures were mortality, treatment-related adverse effects, length of hospital stay, and length of stay within the intensive care unit (ICU).

Results: A total of seven randomized controlled trials and 18 non-randomized controlled trials were included in this network meta-analysis. The trials included six interventions: Phenytoin (PHT)+phenobarbital (PB), levetiracetam (LEV), PHT, PHT-LEV, lacosamide (LCM), and valproate (VPA). All interventions except VPA significantly reduced the rate of early PTE in TBI patients compared with the placebo. Seven studies reported the impact of four treatments (PHT + PB, LEV, PHT, VPA) on late seizures and showed a significant reduction in the incidence of late seizures in patients with TBI compared with placebo. The impact of PHT, LEV, and VPA on mortality was reported in nine studies. PHT had no impact on mortality, but patients treated with both LEV and VPA had higher mortality than those treated with placebo. The treatment-related adverse effects of LEV, PHT, and LCM were reported in five studies. LEV and PHT had higher treatment-related adverse effects incidence than placebo, while LCM had no effect on treatment related-adverse effects.

Conclusion: LEV and PHT prevented early and late PTE. PHT also reduced the mortality rate in patients with TBI. Both LEV and PHT had higher treatment-related adverse effects compared with placebo. However, LEV had a slightly lower incidence of treatment-related adverse effects when compared with PHT. Compared with PHT, LEV did not reduce the length of hospital stay but shortened the length of ICU stays. Therefore, based on the findings of this meta-analysis, we speculate that LEV is the best treatment option for TBI patients. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Overview of systematic reviews: Management of common Traumatic Brain Injury-related complications

Background

Many clinical interventions are trialled to manage medical complications following Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). However, published evidence for the effects of those clinical interventions is limited. This article is an overview of common complications and their management from published systematic reviews in TBI.

Methods and findings

A health science electronic database search for published systematic reviews for management of common complications in TBI was conducted in the last decade till 31st January 2021. Methodological quality and evidence were critically appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations and Revised-Assessment of Multiple Systematic review tools. Overall, only six systematic reviews complied with search criteria, these evaluated fatigue, spasticity and post traumatic seizures (29 RCTs, 13 cohort studies, n = 5639 participants). No systematic reviews for other common TBI-related complications met criteria for this review. The included reviews varied from ‘moderate to high’ in methodological quality. The findings suggest beneficial treatment effect of anti-epileptic drugs (phenytoin/levetiracetam) compared with placebo in reducing early seizure incidence, but no significant benefit of phenytoin over levetiracetam, valproate, or neuroprotective agent for early or late posttraumatic seizures. There was ‘limited’ evidence for spasticity-related interventions, and ‘insufficient’ evidence of cardiorespiratory training on fatigue levels.

Conclusions

Despite the high prevalence and associated functional impact of TBI-related complications, there is limited evidence to guide treating clinicians for management of common TBI complications. More robust studies are needed to build evidence in this population.

Multicenter and prospective trial of anti-epileptics for early seizure prevention in mild traumatic brain injury with a positive computed tomography scan

Background:

Posttraumatic seizures (PTSs) are a major source of disability after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines recommend prophylactic anti-epileptics (AEDs) for early PTS in severe TBI, but high-quality evidence is lacking in mild TBI.

Methods:

To determine the benefit of administering prophylactic AEDs, we performed a prospective and multicenter study evaluating consecutive patients who presented to a Level 1 trauma center from January 2017 to December 2020. We included all patients with mild TBI defined as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13–15 and a positive head computed tomography (CT). Patients were excluded for previous seizure history, current AED use, or a neurosurgical procedure. Patients were given a prophylactic 7-day course of AEDs on a week-on versus week-off basis and followed with in-person clinic visits, in-hospital evaluation, or a validated phone questionnaire.

Results:

Four hundred and ninety patients were enrolled, 349 (71.2%) had follow-up, and 139 (39.8%) were given prophylactic AEDs. There was no difference between seizure rates for the prophylactic AED group (0.7%) and those without (2.9%; P = 0.25). Patients who had a PTS were on average older (81.4 years) than patients without a seizure (64.8 years; P = 0.02). Seizure rate increased linearly by age groups: <60 years old (0%); 60–70 years old (1.7%); 70–80 years old (2.3%); and >80 years old (4.6%).

Conclusion:

Prophylactic AEDs did not provide a benefit for PTS reduction in mild TBI patients with a positive CT head scan.

Management of Epileptic Seizures in Disorders of Consciousness: An International Survey

Epileptic seizures/post-traumatic epilepsy (ES/PTE) are frequent in persons with brain injuries, particularly for patients with more severe injuries including ones that result in disorders of consciousness (DoC). Surprisingly, there are currently no best practice guidelines for assessment or management of ES in persons with DoC. This study aimed to identify clinician attitudes toward epilepsy prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment in patients with DoC as well as current practice in regards to the use of amantadine in these individuals. A cross-sectional online survey was sent to members of the International Brain Injury Association (IBIA). Fifty physician responses were included in the final analysis. Withdrawal of antiepileptic drug/anti-seizure medications (AED/ASM) therapy was guided by the absence of evidence of clinical seizure whether or not the AED/ASM was given prophylactically or for actual seizure/epilepsy treatment. Standard EEG was the most frequent diagnostic method utilized. The majority of respondents ordered an EEG if there were concerns regarding lack of neurological progress. AED/ASM prescription was reported to be triggered by the first clinically evident seizure with levetiracetam being the AED/ASM of choice. Amantadine was frequently prescribed although less so in patients with epilepsy and/or EEG based epileptic abnormalities. A minority of respondents reported an association between amantadine and seizure. Longitudinal studies on epilepsy management, epilepsy impact on neurologic prognosis, as well as potential drug effects on seizure risk in persons with DoC appear warranted with the goal of pushing guideline development forward and improving clinical assessment and management of seizures in this unique, albeit challenging, population.

Role of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in chronic subdural hematoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic subdural hematoma is a common neurosurgical pathology, which is more commonly seen in the elderly age group. Few patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) can have seizures-either before or after surgical intervention. Reported incidence of seizures varies from 0.7-18.5% in patients with cSDH. Many factors which have been proposed to increase the risk of seizures in these patients include the presence of encapsulated membranes, occult cortical injury, mass effect, or an acute hemorrhage. The role of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs is not very clear in cSDH. We reviewed the currently available evidence for the use of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with cSDH. We included 13 studies in the systematic review and 6 studies compared the incidence of seizures in patients who received antiepileptic drugs with those who did not. Our review did not find any significant reduction in the incidence of seizures in patients with cSDH following administration of antiepileptic drugs.

Association between survival and levetiracetam use in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy

This study was conducted to assess whether levetiracetam (LEV) affects the survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) treated with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. To this end, from 2004 to 2016, 322 patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBM who received TMZ-based chemoradiotherapy were analysed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether LEV was used as an anticonvulsant both at the time of surgery and the first visit thereafter. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the groups. The OS was 21.1 and 17.5 months in the LEV (+) and LEV (−) groups, respectively (P = 0.003); the corresponding PFS was 12.3 and 11.2 months (P = 0.017). The other prognostic factors included age, extent of resection, O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score. The multivariate analysis showed age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; P < 0.001), postoperative KPS score (HR 0.99; P = 0.002), complete tumour resection (HR 0.52; P < 0.001), MGMT promoter methylation (HR 0.75; P < 0.001), and LEV use (HR 0.72; P = 0.011) were significantly associated with OS. In conclusion, LEV use was associated with prolonged survival in patients with GBM treated with concurrent TMZ chemoradiotherapy.

Seizure Prophylaxis Following Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Retrospective Investigation of Clinical Practice and the Impact of Clinical Guidelines

Background Post-traumatic seizure (PTS) is a major complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there has been controversy in the literature regarding whether anticonvulsants should be used prophylactically to prevent it, and there is significant variability in practice. The objective of this study is to describe seizure prophylaxis practices after moderate to severe TBI and to determine whether the use of seizure prophylaxis increased following the recommendations of the Quebec Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux and the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (INESSS-ONF) guidelines. This study will also compare the characteristics of patients who receive the recommended prophylaxis and those who do not. Methods All adult patients admitted to a level-1 trauma centre for moderate to severe TBI were eligible for this study (n = 96). Medical records including patient age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, mechanism of injury, and occurrence of PTS were reviewed in a retrospective manner regarding the administration of recommended seizure prophylaxis. Results The proportion of patients receiving the recommended seizure prophylaxis was 8%. There was no significant increase after the release of the INESSS-ONF guidelines (p: 0.38). There were no significant differences in demographics, injury characteristics, or rates of early PTS between patients receiving the recommended prophylaxis and those not receiving it (p: >0.05). Conclusion The results indicate that the use of the recommended seizure prophylaxis after moderate to severe TBI is low and that the release of the INESSS-ONF guidelines did not increase its use. Patient and injury factors do not appear to influence the use of seizure prophylaxis. These results highlight variability in seizure prophylaxis practices and the importance of understanding local practice patterns. Implementation strategies should be identified to increase adherence to the recommendations and improve patient care.

Impact of anti-epileptic drug choice on discharge in acute traumatic brain injury patients

Background

Anti-epileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis in the first-seven days post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to reduce seizure frequency acutely. AED efficacy is equivalent; therefore, choice of AED may rest with their side-effects. We hypothesise that AEDs that impair balance will prolong recovery, shown by a longer hospital stay. We compared length of hospital stay (and reported dizziness) in TBI patients receiving the commonest AEDs used in our TBI patients, Phenytoin (which may cause imbalance), and Levetiracetam (which does not affect balance).

Method

A retrospective observational study was performed on TBI patients admitted to a Major Trauma Unit between October 2013 and June 2018. 100 of 278 patients treated with phenytoin or levetiracetam monotherapy for seizure prophylaxis were included. The inclusion criteria of admission Glasgow Coma Score of 14 or more and length of stay less than 3 weeks minimised confounding variables such as non-ambulant patients. Length of hospital stay and incidence of dizziness were assessed.

Results

The length of hospital stay was longer for patients on Phenytoin versus Levetiracetam, i.e., 10.74 vs. 7.58 days (p = 0.015; unpaired, two-sided t test). Dizziness reported by patients on phenytoin was 24% and levetiracetam was 8% (p = 0.018; Chi-squared test).

Conclusion

In this cohort, using Phenytoin for acute TBI, seizure prophylaxis was associated with longer length of stay and more dizziness compared to Levetiracetam. Given their equivalent AED efficacy in acute TBI seizure prophylaxis, our data suggest that Levetiracetam is preferable to Phenytoin for early seizure prophylaxis in TBI. This requires evaluation in larger, prospective studies.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy causes serious suffering in children and is associated with high morbidity and increased mortality. It impairs children's quality of life and places a heavy burden on healthcare resources. Levetiracetam has been used to prevent and treat paediatric epilepsy for years. To date, a number of systematic reviews have been performed to assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in a variety of clinical settings. Conflicting outcomes have been reported for the same clinical issues. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature for clinicians and policymakers via an umbrella review that assesses the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines for umbrella reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The following seven databases will be searched from 1990 to February 2019: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, JBISRIR, EPPI, Epistemonikos and PROSPERO. We will provide evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials regarding the use of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy. The intervention of interest is levetiracetam monotherapy and add-on therapies for prevention or treatment purposes. Studies will be individually selected and assessed by two reviewers. The primary outcomes of interest are epilepsy control, the efficacy of prophylaxis for provoked seizures and the mortality rate of children with epilepsy who received levetiracetam treatment. The secondary outcomes are adverse events and withdrawal rates due to adverse effects. The methodological quality of all reviews will be individually assessed by two reviewers using the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews' instrument. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment will be applied to evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome of interest. A narrative description of an analysis of the systematic reviews will be tabulated to address objective and specific questions. Information from each review will be detailed in a table including the population, number of studies, total number of participants, year range of the trials, study designs of the primary trials, countries and settings of the trials, heterogeneity of results and assessment tools. Recommendations regarding each outcome of levetiracetam will be categorised based on a protocol.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This umbrella review will inform clinical and policy decisions regarding the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam for preventing and treating paediatric epilepsy. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Ethical approval is not required for this study.

Prophylactic antiepileptic treatment with levetiracetam for patients undergoing supratentorial brain tumor surgery: a two-center matched cohort study

Guidelines on the administration of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AED), and specifically levetiracetam, for brain tumor surgery are still lacking. In this two-center matched cohort study, we aim to compare the proportion of postoperative seizures during follow-up after supratentorial tumor surgery in patients receiving no seizure prophylaxis, and those treated with levetiracetam perioperatively. Three hundred sixteen consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial tumor surgery, without history of seizures were included: 207 patients did not receive AED (no AED group), and 109 patients received levetiracetam perioperatively (levetiracetam group). The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative seizures. Additionally, uni- and multivariate analyses assessing possible risk factors for postoperative seizures were performed. No statistically significant difference for the occurrence of postoperative seizures was found between the two groups (10.1%, n = 21 in the no AED group vs. 9.2%, n = 10, in the levetiracetam group; p = 0.69, OR 0.9 [0.4-2.0), NNT 103 [12.9-17.1]). After propensity score matching, the primary outcome was observed in 13 patients (12.4%) from the no AED group and in 9 patients (8.6%) from the levetiracetam group (p = 0.50, OR 0.7 [0.3-1.6], NNT 26.3 [8.3-22.4]). Among all analyzed possible risk factors for postoperative seizures, only postoperative infarction showed a statistically significant association with higher seizure rates in multivariate analysis (OR 8.2 [1.1-60.6], p = 0.04). Prophylactic treatment with levetiracetam after brain tumor surgery showed no statistically significant effect in preventing postoperative seizures. However, in case a postoperative infarction occurs, its administration might be indicated.

Head injury in the elderly - an overview for the physician

Head injury is a common cause for hospital admission and additionally 250,000 UK inpatients fall during hospital admissions annually. Head injury most commonly occurs as a result of falls from standing height in older adults. Older adults are frequently frail and multi-morbid; many have indications for anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. The haemorrhagic complications of head injury occur in up to 16% of anticoagulated patients sustaining a head injury. These patients suffer adverse outcomes from surgery as a result of medical complications. Although geriatric trauma models are evolving to meet the demand of an ageing trauma population, medical support to trauma services is commonly delivered by general physicians, many of whom lack experience and training in this field. Determining the role of surgery and interrupted anticoagulation requires careful personalised risk assessment. Appreciation of the opposing risks can be challenging; it requires an understanding of the evidence base in both surgery and medicine to rationalise decision making and inform communication. This article aims to provide an overview for the physician with clinical responsibility for patients who have sustained head injury.

Adjusting for confounding by indication in observational studies: a case study in traumatic brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Observational studies of interventions are at risk for confounding by indication. The objective of the current study was to define the circumstances for the validity of methods to adjust for confounding by indication in observational studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed post hoc analyses of data prospectively collected from three European and North American traumatic brain injury studies including 1,725 patients. The effects of three interventions (intracranial pressure [ICP] monitoring, intracranial operation and primary referral) were estimated in a proportional odds regression model with the Glasgow Outcome Scale as ordinal outcome variable. Three analytical methods were compared: classical covariate adjustment, propensity score matching and instrumental variable (IV) analysis in which the percentage exposed to an intervention in each hospital was added as an independent variable, together with a random intercept for each hospital. In addition, a simulation study was performed in which the effect of a hypothetical beneficial intervention (OR 1.65) was simulated for scenarios with and without unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

For all three interventions, covariate adjustment and propensity score matching resulted in negative estimates of the treatment effect (OR ranging from 0.80 to 0.92), whereas the IV approach indicated that both ICP monitoring and intracranial operation might be beneficial (OR per 10% change 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.42 and 1.42, 95% CI 0.95-1.97). In our simulation study, we found that covariate adjustment and propensity score matching resulted in an invalid estimate of the treatment effect in case of unmeasured confounders (OR ranging from 0.90 to 1.03). The IV approach provided an estimate in the similar direction as the simulated effect (OR per 10% change 1.04-1.05) but was statistically inefficient.

CONCLUSION

The effect estimation of interventions in observational studies strongly depends on the analytical method used. When unobserved confounding and practice variation are expected in observational multicenter studies, IV analysis should be considered.

Treatment options for posttraumatic epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Posttraumatic seizures (PTS) and posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) are common and debilitating consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Early PTS result in secondary brain injury by raising intracranial pressure and worsening cerebral edema and metabolic crisis. PTE is a localization-related epilepsy strongly associated with TBI severity, but risk factors for PTE and epileptogenesis are incompletely understood and are active areas of research. Medical management of PTS in adults and children is reviewed. Surgical options for posttraumatic drug-resistant epilepsy are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Continuous electroencephalography is indicated for children and adults with TBI and coma because of the high incidence of nonconvulsive seizures, periodic discharges, and associated secondary brain injury in this population. Neuroinflammation is a central component of secondary brain injury and appears to play a key role in epileptogenesis. Levetiracetam is increasingly used for seizure prophylaxis in adults and children, but variability remains.

SUMMARY

PTS occur commonly after TBI and are associated with secondary brain injury and worse outcomes in adults and children. Current medical and surgical management options for PTS and PTE are reviewed.

Clinical characteristics and electroencephalogram analysis of levetiracetam in the treatment of children with febrile seizure recurrence

Febrile seizure is the most common neurologic disorder in infants and children. This study aimed to elaborate safe and effective therapy for preventing FS recurrence by levetiracetam (LEV). A prospective study was performed in two groups of children, the no treatment group (n=51, 24.1±9.0 months) and the LEV treatment group (n=45, 23.3±8.9 months). The findings demonstrated that a significant difference (P<0.01) was observed between the no treatment group 51.0% (26/51) and LEV treatment group 15.5% (7/45) in terms of FS recurrence after 50 weeks. FS recurrence/fever episode was 12.4% (12/97) in the LEV treatment group and 51.8% (57/110) in the no treatment group. Furthermore, LEV administration significantly improved (P<0.001) epileptiform + nonspecific EEG abnormalities (17.8%; 8/45), as compared with the no treatment group (68.6%; 35/51). In conclusion, LEV could function as an effective therapeutic agent for the prevention of FS recurrence and reducing the frequency of fever episodes. Furthermore, LEV administration significantly improved nonspecific EEG abnormalities, which may be used as a clinical monitoring index for LEV treatment in patients with FS.