Noncompliance with asthma therapy--are there solutions?

Ways to increase adherence to allergen immunotherapy

Adherence to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is crucial for its efficacy. Subcutaneous AIT requires monthly visits (or more extended in the case of venom immunotherapy), while sublingual AIT is performed with a daily intake of allergen drops. Non-adherence to an AIT schedule and premature discontinuation are common problems. Various studies have shown controversial results on the rate of AIT adherence. The aim of this review is to describe the problem of non-adherence and to offer some evidence-based advice to allergologists on how to increase it. Better patient education at the beginning of treatment, sharing with patients the decision on which type of immunotherapy to select and showing sincere interest in their treatment concerns are some tips that can help to increase adherence. A well organized allergologist time schedule not only increases safety but also offers the possibility of close follow-up and an increase in patient loyalty.

Future perspectives of anticholinergics for the treatment of asthma in adults and children

Despite major advances in therapeutic interventions and the availability of detailed treatment guidelines, a high proportion of patients with symptomatic asthma remain uncontrolled. Asthma management is largely guided by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy and is based on a backbone of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy with the use of additional therapies to achieve disease control. Inhaled long-acting bronchodilators alone and in combination are the preferred add-on treatment options. Although long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a relatively recent addition to disease management recommendations for asthma, tiotropium has been extensively studied in a large clinical trial program. In Europe and the United States, tiotropium is approved for patients aged ≥6 years and uncontrolled on medium- to high-dose ICS/long-acting β2-agonists at GINA Steps 4 and 5 with a history of exacerbations. Evidence supports the efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® in adults in terms of lung function and asthma control, with a safety profile comparable with that of placebo across a range of asthma severities. Similarly, clinical trials in patients aged 1-17 years have shown improvements in lung function and trends toward improved asthma control. Furthermore, its efficacy makes tiotropium relatively easy to incorporate into routine clinical practice, irrespective of allergic status and without the need for patient phenotyping. Tiotropium is a cost-effective treatment that may offer an important alternative to other, more expensive add-on therapies. This review discusses the potential future position of LAMAs in clinical practice by considering the continuously evolving evidence. Prominence is given to tiotropium, the only LAMA supported by a structured clinical trial program in asthma to date, while also considering other recommended treatment options for patients with uncontrolled asthma. The importance of effective patient/caregiver-clinician communication and shared decision-making in enhancing treatment adherence is also highlighted.

Regular follow-up visits reduce the risk for asthma exacerbation requiring admission in Korean adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma requires regular follow-up visits and sustained medication use. Although several studies have reported the importance of adherence to medication and compliance with the treatment, none to date have reported the importance of regular follow-up visits. We investigated the effects of regular clinical visits on asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

We used claims data in the national medical insurance review system provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea. We included subjects aged ≥ 15 years with a diagnosis of asthma, and who were prescribed asthma-related medication, from July 2013 to June 2014. Regular visitors (frequent visitors) were defined as subjects who visited the hospital for follow-up of asthma three or more times per year.

RESULTS

Among 729,343 subjects, 496,560 (68.1%) were classified as regular visitors. Old age, male sex, lack of medical aid insurance, attendance of a tertiary hospital, a high Charlson comorbidity index, and a history of admission for exacerbated asthma in the previous year were significant determining factors for regular visitor status. When we adjusted for all these factors, frequent visitors showed a lower risk of asthma exacerbation requiring general ward admission (odds ratio [OR] 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.50; P < 0.001), emergency room admission (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.79-0.86; P < 0.001), and intensive care unit admission (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.44-0.54; P < 0.001) than infrequent visitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular clinical visits are significantly associated with a reduced risk of asthma exacerbation requiring hospital admission in Korean adults with asthma.

Randomized Trial of Dexamethasone Versus Prednisone for Children with Acute Asthma Exacerbations

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether 2 doses of dexamethasone is as effective as 5 days of prednisolone/prednisone therapy in improving symptoms and quality of life of children with asthma exacerbations admitted to the emergency department (ED).

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a randomized, noninferiority trial including patients aged 1-14 years who presented to the ED with acute asthma to compare the efficacy of 2 doses of dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg/dose, experimental treatment) vs a 5-day course of prednisolone/prednisone (1.5 mg/kg/d, followed by 1 mg/kg/d on days 2-5, conventional treatment). Two follow-up telephone interviews were completed at 7 and 15 days. The primary outcome measures were the percentage of patients with asthma symptoms and quality of life at day 7. Secondary outcomes were unscheduled returns, admissions, adherence, and vomiting.

RESULTS

During the study period, 710 children who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate and 590 agreed. Primary outcome data were available in 557 patients. At day 7, experimental and conventional groups did not show differences related to persistence of symptoms (56.6%, 95% CI 50.6-62.6 vs 58.3%, 95% CI 52.3-64.2, respectively), quality of life score (80.0 vs 77.7, not significant [ns]), admission rate (23.9% vs 21.7%, ns), unscheduled ED return visits (4.6% vs 3.3%, ns), and vomiting (2.1% vs 4.4%, ns). Adherence was greater in the dexamethasone group (99.3% vs 96.0%, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Two doses of dexamethasone may be an effective alternative to a 5-day course of prednisone/prednisolone for asthma exacerbations, as measured by persistence of symptoms and quality of life at day 7.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2013-003145-42.

The effects of patient education programs on medication use among asthma and COPD patients: a propensity score matching with a difference-in-difference regression approach

Background

Adherence to medication is one of the critical determinants of successful management of chronic diseases including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given that poor adherence with self-management medication is very common among asthma and COPD patients, interventions that improve the use of chronic disease management medications for this patient group have potential to generate positive health outcomes. In an effort to improve asthma and COPD care, the Lung Association of Saskatchewan has implemented an intervention by providing access to effective and high quality asthma and COPD education for both patients and health care professionals along with increasing access to spirometry.

By evaluating the impacts of this intervention, our purpose in this paper is to examine the effectiveness of spirometry use, and asthma and COPD education in primary care setting on medication use among asthma and COPD patients.

Methods

At the time of the intervention, the Lung Association of Saskatchewan has not assigned a control group. Therefore we used a propensity score matching to create a control group using administrative health databases spanning 6 years prior to the intervention. Using Saskatchewan administrative health databases, the impacts of the intervention on use of asthma and COPD medications were estimated for one to four years after the intervention using a difference in difference regression approach.

Results

The paper shows that overall medication use for the intervention group is higher than that of the control group. On average, intervention group uses more asthma and COPD drugs. Within the asthma and COPD drugs, this intervention creates a persistent effect over time in the form of higher utilization of chronic management drugs equivalent to $157 and $195 in a given year during four years after the intervention.

Conclusions

The study suggests that effective patient education and increasing access to spirometry increases the utilization of chronic disease management drugs among asthma and COPD patients. This type of interventions with patient education focus has potential to save healthcare dollars by providing better disease management among this patient group.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0998-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Concurrent oral and inhalation drug delivery using a dual formulation system: the use of oral theophylline carrier with combined inhalable budesonide and terbutaline

A novel approach to concurrently deliver oral and inhaled drugs as a single formulation is presented. A triple therapy containing theophylline (THEO; orally delivered) with budesonide (BUD) and terbutaline (TERB; as single and co-spray-dried inhaled powders) was prepared as an ordered mix, with THEO acting as a carrier. The aerosolisation performance of THEO formulations containing BUD and TERB alone, physical mix and co-spray-dried powder was evaluated using a next-generation impactor (NGI). Physicochemical properties were investigated using electron microscopy, laser diffraction, dynamic vapour sorption and thermal analysis. NGI analysis indicated that >99 % of the THEO powder was >4.46 μm, with >90 % dissolved within 5 min. Particle size analysis showed TEB and BUD samples were of a suitable size for inhalation. Thermal and moisture analysis suggested powders to be stable at room temperature up to 70 % RH. Aerosol studies indicated a different performance of BUD and TERB depending on the mixing procedure. The co-spray-dried formulation showed the highest performance, with a fine particle fraction (≤4.46 μm) of BUD and TERB of 34.39 ± 3.56 and 33.61 ± 5.67 %, respectively. Such observations suggest that this multicomponent drug delivery system could be developed to concomitantly deliver oral and inhaled drugs, an approach that, to date, does not exist. Ultimately, this technology potentially reduces the requirement for multiple therapies and increases patient compliance.

Asthma inhaler adherence determinants in adults: systematic review of observational data

Nonadherence to inhaled medication leads to poor asthma control and increased healthcare utilisation. Many studies exploring adherence determinants have been conducted, but summaries of the evidence are scarce. We performed a systematic review of observational research on determinants of asthma inhaler adherence among adults. We searched for articles in English reporting quantitative observational studies on inhaler adherence correlates among adults in developed countries, published in EMBASE, Medline, PsychInfo and PsychArticles in 1990-2014. Two coders independently assessed eligibility and extracted data, and assessed study quality. Results were summarised qualitatively into social and economic, and healthcare-, therapy-, condition- and patient-related factors. The 51 studies included mainly examined patient-related factors and found consistent links between adherence and stronger inhaler-necessity beliefs, and possibly older age. There was limited evidence on the relevance of other determinants, partly due to study heterogeneity regarding the types of determinants examined. Methodological quality varied considerably and studies performed generally poorly on their definitions of variables and measures, risk of bias, sample size and data analysis. A broader adoption of common methodological standards and health behaviour theories is needed before cumulative science on the determinants of adherence to asthma inhalers among adults can develop further.

Can montelukast shorten prednisolone therapy in children with mild to moderate acute asthma? A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether outpatient post-stabilization therapy with montelukast produces more treatment failures than prednisolone.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy non-inferiority trial, 130 children 2 to 17 years of age with mild to moderate acute asthma stabilized with prednisolone in the emergency department received 5 daily treatments with either prednisolone or montelukast after discharge. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 8 days (ie, an asthma-related unscheduled visit, hospitalization, or additional systemic corticosteroids).

RESULTS

The rates of treatment failure were 7.9% in the prednisolone group and 22.4% in the montelukast group (95% CI, 26.5%-2.4%). Treatment was more likely to fail in younger patients (odds ratio, 4.9). In the montelukast group, more patients received additional pharmacotherapy than in patients receiving prednisolone (23.9% versus 9.5%, P = .03). The differences in the daily salbutamol treatments, asymptomatic days, and changes in the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure score were not significant (P = .85, .75, and .26, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Montelukast does not represent an adequate alternative to corticosteroids after outpatient stabilization in mild to moderate acute asthma. This population should receive oral corticosteroids after discharge.

Anti-inflammatory treatment of asthma: differentiation and trial-and-error

The relative lack of evidence for anti-inflammatory treatment of some phenotypes of asthma in children has been highlighted in recent guidelines and consensus reports specifically aiming at the paediatric population. Consequently, we are left with a need for defining treatment strategies in the clinical setting. The decision to initiate antiinflammatory treatment should be based on assessments of the individual child's age, the type of asthma, severity, heredity and atopic condition, adherence factors and sensitivity to systemic adverse effects of treatment options. Inhaled corticosteroids are potent anti-inflammatory agents that are effective in the whole spectrum of asthma in school age children. In toddlers with viral wheeze and in children with mild asthma oral leukotriene receptor antagonists or inhaled corticosteroids may be given on a trial-and-error basis.

CONCLUSION

To treat all children with asthma equally effectively from infancy through adolescence does not mean that they should be treated identically and in some types of asthma a trial-and-error approach may be warranted.

Methods of assessing adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in children and adolescents: adherence rates and their implications for clinical practice

Nonadherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy is common and has a negative effect on clinical control, as well as increasing morbidity rates, mortality rates and health care costs. This review was conducted using direct searches, together with the following sources: Medline; HighWire; and the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database. Searches included articles published between 1992 and 2008. The following methods of assessing adherence, listed in ascending order by degree of objectivity, were identified: patient or family reports; clinical judgment; weighing/dispensing of medication, electronic medication monitoring; and (rarely) biochemical analysis. Adherence rates ranged from 30 to 70%. It is recognized that the degree of adherence determined by patient/family reports or by clinical judgment is exaggerated in comparison with that obtained using electronic medication monitors. Physicians should bear in mind that true adherence rates are lower than those reported by patients, and this should be considered in cases of poor clinical control. Weighing the spray quantifies the medication and infers adherence. However, there can be deliberate emptying of inhalers and medication sharing. Pharmacies provide the dates on which the medication was dispensed and refilled. This strategy is valid and should be used in Brazil. The use of electronic medication monitors, which provide the date and time of each triggering of the medication device, although costly, is the most accurate method of assessing adherence. The results obtained with such monitors demonstrate that adherence was lower than expected. Physicians should improve their knowledge on patient adherence and use accurate methods of assessing such adherence.

Achieving asthma control in practice: understanding the reasons for poor control

Achieving asthma control remains an elusive goal for the majority of patients worldwide. Ensuring a correct diagnosis of asthma is the first step in assessing poor symptom control; this requires returning to the basics of history taking and physical examination, in conjunction with lung function measurement when appropriate. A number of factors may contribute to sub-optimal asthma control. Concomitant rhinitis, a common co-pathology and contributor to poor control, can often be identified by asking a simple question. Smoking too has been identified as a cause of poor asthma control. Practical barriers such as poor inhaler technique must be addressed. An appreciation of patients' views and concerns about maintenance asthma therapy can help guide discussion to address perceptual barriers to taking maintenance therapy (doubts about personal necessity and concerns about potential adverse effects). Further study into, and a greater consideration of, factors and patient characteristics that could predict individual responses to asthma therapies are needed. Finally, more clinical trials that enrol patient populations reflecting the real world diversity of patients seen in clinical practice, including wide age ranges, presence of comorbidities, current smoking, and differing ethnic origins, will contribute to better individual patient management.

Extent of uncontrolled disease and associated medical costs in severe asthma--a PHARMO study

OBJECTIVE

Asthma is a major public health problem with considerable economic impact. The highest costs being observed in patients with severe asthma. Furthermore, despite the use of recommended therapies, asthma control can still be poor. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the extent of uncontrolled disease and associated medical costs in severe asthma.

METHODS

The PHARMO Record Linkage System includes among others drug dispensing and hospitalizations for > or = 2 million subjects in The Netherlands. Severe asthma patients used long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids for over 200 days and short-acting beta-agonists for at least 100 days in 2004. Severe uncontrolled asthma was defined as a hospitalization for asthma or use of multiple short courses of oral corticosteroids assessed in 2004. Reimbursed costs of asthma drugs and hospitalizations were calculated during this year. A matched nested-case control study was performed to identify treatment-related risk factors for uncontrolled disease. Information on clinical diagnosis of (severity of) asthma was not available.

RESULTS

About 17% of patients with severe asthma aged 12-49 years (N = 1158) showed lack of control. Excess drug costs for severe uncontrolled asthma with hospitalization mounted up to 700 Euro per patient per year and 300 Euro per patient per year for patients without hospitalization. Including hospital admission costs, excess costs mounted up to over 10,000 Euro per patient per year. Lack of control did not seem to be caused by under-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Poor control of severe asthma leads to disproportionately increased direct costs compared to severe controlled asthma, especially when hospital admission is required.

Optimal management of asthma in elderly patients: strategies to improve adherence to recommended interventions

Adherence to asthma medications presents a problem in all age groups, and older people with chronic illnesses such as asthma also have multiple co-morbidities and consequently complex healthcare needs. It has been suggested that older people are also less likely to adhere to medication and treatment than younger people. Although the prevalence of asthma in older people is similar to that of the general population, over two-thirds of those who die from asthma are >50 years of age and there is strong evidence for under-diagnosis. Clinicians therefore face specific challenges in providing healthcare with respect to both asthma diagnosis and treatment in older age groups. Non-adherence to medication can be defined as either 'intentional' or 'unintentional'. Unintentional non-adherence is more likely to be associated with sociodemographic or physical barriers to the use of medication. Intentional non-adherence results from the balance of individual reasoning of risks versus the benefits of taking medication and acceptance of asthma diagnosis. Intentional non-adherence can be addressed through strategies that influence health beliefs and concerns about the adverse effects of medicine. Unintentional adherence can be addressed by assessing and educating the patient in relation to device use and providing education and clear written instructions about medication requirements. However, some barriers to medication use, such as financial ones, may be systematic. Most studies of medication use, efficacy, adverse effects and adherence in patients with asthma primarily involve younger people. Studies of strategies to improve asthma adherence outcomes specifically in older people are urgently needed.

Single-dose oral dexamethasone in the emergency management of children with exacerbations of mild to moderate asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a single dose of oral dexamethasone (Dex) versus 5 days of twice-daily prednisolone (Pred) in the management of mild to moderate asthma exacerbations in children.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial of children 2 to 16 years of age who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute mild to moderate asthma exacerbations. Subjects received single-dose oral Dex (0.6 mg/kg to a maximum of 18 mg) or oral Pred (1 mg/kg per dose to a maximum of 30 mg) twice daily for 5 days. After discharge, subjects were contacted by telephone at 48 h to assess symptoms and reevaluated in the ED in 5 days. The primary outcome was the number of days needed for Patient Self Assessment Score to return to baseline (score of 0-0.5).

MAIN RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. The mean number of days needed for Patient Self Assessment Score to return to baseline (0-0.5) in the Dex and Pred groups were 5.21 versus 5.22 days, respectively (mean difference, -0.01; confidence interval, -0.70, 0.68). Pulmonary index scores were similar in both groups at initial presentation, initial ED discharge and at the day 5 follow-up visit. At the first visit, mean time to discharge was 3.5 h (+/-1.93)for Dex and 4.3 h (+/-3.67) for Pred (mean difference, -0.8; confidence interval, -1.8, 0.2). Initial admission rate was 9% (Dex) versus 13.4% (Pred). There was no significant difference in the number of salbutamol therapies needed in the ED nor at home after discharge. For subjects discharged home, the admission rate after initial discharge was 4.9% (Dex) versus 1.8% (Pred), resulting in overall hospital admission rates of 13.4% (Dex) and 14.9% (Pred).

CONCLUSION

A single dose of oral Dex (0.6 mg/kg) is no worse than 5 days of twice-daily prednisolone (1 mg/kg per dose) in the management of children with mild to moderate asthma.

Emergency department as the main source of asthma care

Many asthma patients use the emergency department (ED) as the sole source of asthma care. This is considered inadequate and poor practice. This prospective study revealed that young age, lack of evening clinic, forgetting to keep the appointment, conflicting priorities of daily life, and easy access to the ED on an as-needed basis for urgent care, medications, and prescriptions, and failure to use inhaled corticosteroids were significant while lack of insurance or access to asthma clinic were not significant factors in exclusive use of the ED. Establishing ED asthma education programs or an after hours asthma clinic may alleviate the practice.

The Difficult-to-Control Asthmatic: A Systematic Approach

With the judicious use of inhaled corticosteroids, beta2 agonists, and leukotriene modifiers, most patients with asthma are easily controlled and managed. However, approximately 5% of asthmatics do not respond to standard therapy and are classified as "difficult to control." 1 Typically, these are patients who complain of symptoms interfering with daily living despite long-term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in doses up to 2,000 mug daily. Many factors can contribute to poor response to conventional therapy, and especially for these patients, a systematic approach is needed to identify the underlying causes. First, the diagnosis of asthma and adherence to the medication regimen should be confirmed. Next, potential persisting exacerbating triggers need to be identified and addressed. Concomitant disorders should be discovered and treated. Lastly, the impact and implications of socioeconomic and psychological factors on disease control can be significant and should be acknowledged and discussed with the individual patient. Less conventional and novel strategies for treating corticosteroid-resistant asthma do exist. However, their use is based on small studies that do not meet evidence-based criteria; therefore, it is essential to sort through and address the above issues before reverting to other therapy.

Do patients show the same level of adherence with all dry powder inhalers?

Poor adherence with inhaled therapy presents a considerable problem. In the UK, non-adherence is estimated to occur in 10-46% of those prescribed inhaled corticosteroids and may contribute to an estimated 18-48% of asthma deaths. Before dry powder inhalers can be considered interchangeable, it is important to check that adherence is unaffected by any switching of the device dispensed to patients. Numerous studies have shown that adherence with inhaled medication is a multifactorial issue. A number of evidence-based guidelines have concluded that there is no difference in the delivery of treatments from different inhaler devices. However, many studies comparing different devices are designed to show equivalence. It is therefore difficult to determine whether the studies on which the guidelines are based were conducted with treatments already being used at the top of a dose-response curve. Furthermore, studies use selected patient populations who consent to take part and consequently receive regular contact with healthcare professionals, with emphasis on using the correct inhaler technique and on compliance. These studies do not therefore necessarily reflect real life. It is possible that patient preferences or perceptions of differences in efficacy are behind complaints when devices are switched. Patients vary in their preference for different dry powder inhalers, as shown in numerous studies of patient attitudes. There is evidence to indicate that patient claims of differences between inhalers that contain the same molecule from different manufacturers may have an objective basis. Healthcare professionals increasingly recognise the impact of patient attitudes on adherence. Accepting that patients make choices about their therapy is an integral part of achieving the partnership in management recommended by guidelines. The most effective treatment will not achieve disease control if it is not used or if it is used incorrectly. It may be short-sighted to change a device that a patient has chosen to one that is just given without consent, as this may result in poor adherence to therapy with consequent loss of control.

Higher patient perceived side effects related to higher daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids in the community: a cross-sectional analysis

The range and extent of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) side effects experienced by patients in the general community are likely to be underestimated.

AIMS

To identify the side effects of ICS perceived by patients in the community and, through the use of a self-report questionnaire, measure their intensity, prevalence and relationship with daily medication dose.

METHODS

Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted to identify side effects that patients associated with their use of ICS. In an international multicentre cross-sectional survey, 395 inhaler users from community pharmacy (mean age 50, 53% female), divided into 4 daily dosage groups (beta2-agonist without ICS n=66, beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalent ICS low dose 400 microg, n=109; mid dose 401-800 microg, n=151; and high dose>800 microg, n=69) reported how much they were affected by these side effects on a 7-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Focus groups and interviews revealed 57 side effects that were associated with ICS use. Cross-sectional survey results showed significant differences in side effect perception between the four dosage groups for 31 items (all P0.01) and a rising intensity with increasing ICS dose for total side effect score (P<0.001). For ICS users reporting the most bothersome side effects (scoring 3 on 0-6 scale) there was a rising prevalence as ICS dose increased for 34 items. A multivariate model confirmed that mid and high ICS dosages were statistically significantly associated with side effect perception after controlling for the other factors and covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher daily ICS doses were associated with a higher intensity and a higher prevalence of many patient perceived side effects, lending support to the call for dose titration in clinical practice. Results indicate the usefulness of patient self-report scales for understanding the burden of side effects of ICS in the community.

Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in development for the treatment of asthma. Roflumilast was compared with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with asthma.

METHODS

In a double blind, double-dummy, randomized, noninferiority study, 499 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50-85% predicted) received roflumilast 500 microg once daily or BDP 200 microg twice daily (400 microg/day) for 12 weeks. Lung function and adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

Roflumilast and BDP significantly improved FEV1 by 12% (270 +/- 30 ml) and 14% (320 +/- 30 ml), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Roflumilast and BDP also significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). There were no significant differences between roflumilast and BDP with regard to improvement in FEV1 and FVC. Roflumilast and BDP showed small improvements in median asthma symptom scores (-0.82 and -1.00, respectively) and reduced rescue medication use (-1.00 and -1.15 median puffs/day, respectively; P < 0.0001 vs baseline). These small differences between roflumilast and BDP were not considered clinically relevant. Both agents were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Once daily, oral roflumilast 500 microg was comparable with inhaled twice-daily BDP (400 microg/day) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.

Clinical practice guidelines: medical follow-up of patients with asthma--adults and adolescents

The follow-up of patients with asthma should focus on asthma control (disease course over a number of weeks).

How can we improve compliance in pediatric pneumology and allergology?

Not too long ago, physicians took 'compliance' or 'adherence' to mean the strict obedience of patients and parents - doing what the physician said, suggesting that the success or failure of the treatment lay entirely in the hands of the patient. But it is preferable to improve compliance rather than enforce it. As there is no single solution that will ensure compliance, several steps should be taken: (i) 'exploration' includes open questions, and allows admission of non-compliance, e.g. in terms of failure to take drugs, or smoking; (ii) 'education' means explaining pathomechanisms, and reducing corticophobia; (iii) 'tailoring' is reached by focussing therapeutic options on individual requirements, and simplifying treatment regimens; (iv) 'contracting' involves negotiating a realistic therapeutic regimen on an individual basis; (v) 'reminders' are practical tips, which may help to overcome reluctance, e.g. by placing drugs in the toothbrush glass, and on the breakfast table, or in the sports bag; (vi) 'follow-up' ensures long-term compliance, with regular visits to the physician, and self-management programmes. In conclusion, non-compliance of patients and parents is a challenging problem in daily practice. Including the aspects of the abovementioned factors can help build up a relation of trust and partnership, which is the prerequisite of any therapeutic success. However, this is an ongoing process, which has to be continuously reviewed.

Chronic illness self-management: locating the 'self'

AIM

In this paper, we present the findings of a recent research project in which we explored self- management with older people who were diagnosed with asthma.

BACKGROUND

Asthma self-management literature has focused on the need for the patient to 'adhere' to prescribed therapies, in particular the taking of medications, monitoring of respiratory function or recognizing and avoiding triggers.

METHOD

Data were generated during a period of 9 months from three sources; in-depth interviews with 24 older participants, an open-ended questionnaire and two mixed-gender participatory action research groups.

FINDINGS

Based on current literature, our previous research findings which have 'unpacked' what is 'self'-management, and data generated in this project, we propose that three asthma management models are in operation: Medical Model of Self-management, Collaborative Model of Self-management and Self-Agency Model of Self-management. Locating the 'self' in self-management means acknowledging that many people living with a chronic condition are already self-determining and their expertise should be acknowledged as such.

CONCLUSION

Health care professionals can best facilitate people toward self-agency by embracing new understandings of self-management in long-term illness. This process is enhanced when the expertise a person brings to the management of their condition is given the respect it deserves. There needs to be a focus on providing people with the means to grow and learn in a participative relationship that cannot be fully realized with 'off the shelf' self-management solutions.

Pharmacist provision of language-appropriate education for Asian patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To improve asthma treatment outcomes in Asians living in Seattle and for whom English is a second language.

DESIGN

Pre-post design.

SETTING

International Community Health Services, Seattle, Washington.

PATIENTS

Asians older than 18 years with asthma and whose native language was not English.

INTERVENTION

Pharmacists or pharmacy students provided oral and written asthma education in the subject's native language.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported use of valve-holding chambers and peak flow meters; self-reported asthma symptoms at baseline and 6 months after intervention; number of acute asthma-related (non-routine, non-follow-up) clinic visits during the 6 months before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Thirty-two subjects, aged 42 to 88 years, participated. Subjects demonstrated a reduction in mean number of asthma attacks (3.7 to 1.0, P < .001) and night awakenings (1.4 to 0.3, P < .001). Patient satisfaction with the program was excellent. Spacer and peak flow meter use increased from 7 to 18 subjects (P < .001) and 1 to 14 subjects (P < .0002), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Language-appropriate asthma education improved treatment outcome for patients whose native language was not English.

Pediatric asthma: a look at adherence from the patient and family perspective

Although extensive research has been done in an effort to understand and promote adherence in pediatric asthma, little progress has been made in reducing the prevalence of nonadherence. Some researchers argue that a paradigm shift is necessary to advance the adherence field. Despite the recent trend for increasing the role of families in determining treatment plans, a patient-centered approach has been lacking in adherence to a daily regimen. It is clear that, although patients and families show evidence of inadvertent nonadherence (eg, forgetfulness), they also engage in volitional or intentional nonadherence, via reasoned and purposeful decisions. Patients conduct "experiments" with their regimen components in an effort to balance the burden of disease with the burden of treatment. These experiments typically involve some degree of nonadherence. Perhaps, if researchers strive to better understand the decision-making process involved in these experiments, health care providers can guide families in making adherence decisions that would lead to attainment of treatment goals, improvement in quality of life, and realization of positive clinical outcomes.

Optimizing inhaled corticosteroid therapy in children with chronic asthma

Asthma is the most common chronic illness among children, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective long-term therapy available for suppressing airway inflammation in persistent asthma. While the primary aim of ICS therapy is good efficacy with minimal side effects, early diagnosis and treatment of asthma can also improve asthma control and normalize lung function, and may prevent irreversible airway injury. Poor patient compliance is a major barrier to treatment. Simplified dosing regimens (e.g., once-daily administration), good inhaler technique, and education of the patient/caregiver should improve patient compliance. Concerns over ICS therapy are often based on the potential for systemic effects associated with oral corticosteroids (e.g., effects on bone mineral density, or growth suppression in children). Since adverse events are associated with high doses of ICS, the dose in all patients should be titrated to the minimum effective dose required to maintain control. Optimal distribution of an ICS in the lungs rather than the systemic compartment is affected by several factors, including the drug's pharmacokinetic profile, inhaler type, inhaler technique, and drug particle size. For young patients unable to use a dry-powder inhaler or pressurized metered-dose inhaler, a nebulizer facilitates drug delivery through passive inhalation; ICS therapy in the form of budesonide inhalation suspension can be given to children with persistent asthma from 12 months of age. In conclusion, selecting a drug with good efficacy and minimal side effects, such as budesonide, together with an easy-to-use delivery system and ongoing patient/caregiver education, is important in optimizing ICS therapy for children with persistent asthma.

Managing asthma in the real world

Asthma treatment is suboptimal in many patients, with impacts on morbidity and mortality, healthcare resource utilisation and patients' quality of life. The reasons for this include the inherent variability of asthma and the unpredictability of exacerbations, which can range from mild to fatal. In addition, asthma can be difficult to diagnose, particularly in the very young and old. Although treatment guidelines are widely available and well publicised, surveys have identified a significant gap between treatment aims and current levels of asthma control. Patient adherence to inhaled corticosteroids is poor, and many patients rely on short-acting beta2-agonists. The reasons for this are complex but are believed to include poor perception by patients of their asthma severity, concerns about the safety and efficacy of medication and low treatment expectations. Patients appear to be unaware of the extent to which airway inflammation can be controlled and are therefore satisfied with poor asthma control, accepting a high level of symptoms. Increasing patient understanding of asthma and its treatment, allowing patients greater involvement in treatment decisions, increasing the role of asthma nurses and improved communication between physicians and patients may improve outcomes in patients with asthma.

Evaluation of a physician-focused educational intervention on medicaid children with asthma

BACKGROUND

The 1990 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act mandated drug utilization review in response to inappropriate drug use. In the Pennsylvania Medicaid program, pediatric asthma is associated with high healthcare utilization and cost.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of a physician-focused educational intervention on asthma drug use and healthcare utilization.

METHODS

Pre- and postintervention comparison design was used in children 5-18 years of age who were enrolled in the Pennsylvania Medicaid fee-for-service program from July 1, 1998, to March 31, 1999 (preintervention), and July 1, 1999, to March 31, 2000 (postintervention). The intervention packet included patients' drug profiles, medical history, monograph with national asthma management guidelines, and patient education materials to physicians. Main outcome measures are changes in asthma drug utilization among high-users of short-acting beta(2)-agonists (SAB).

RESULTS

The intervention focused on 2 asthma drug use criteria: (1) high-use of quick-relief medication and (2) use of salmeterol without the availability of a quick-relief medication. The intervention reduced quick-relief medication use by 26% among patients with higher use without significant changes in long-term control drugs. In addition, 82% of the recipients evaluated had a positive change in salmeterol utilization as either having an SAB inhaler added after the intervention or salmeterol discontinued after the intervention. There was no significant change in asthma-related emergency department visits or hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the physician responders agreed on the usefulness of the educational materials, the results suggest that the intervention had limited success in improving the pharmacologic management and no effect on the health outcomes. We believe that mailed educational materials to physicians can be effective to change prescribing behavior; however, a more multifaceted intervention may be necessary to improve health outcomes.

The impact of patient compliance on effective asthma management

Low rates of patient compliance pose a major challenge to effective asthma management. Non-compliance depends on many factors, including the patient's own treatment goals, beliefs about therapy, social and economic factors, administration route, convenience of device, and concerns about side-effects. Poor patient compliance may also be due to a discrepancy between the goals of the clinician and those of the patient. Clinicians tend to focus on prevention of mortality and reduction of morbidity, whereas patients are usually concerned with health-related quality of life. Improvement in patient compliance requires better clinician-patient communication and an improved therapeutic alliance between professional and patient, emphasizing shared goals. With shared decision-making, both the clinician and the patient decide on the patient's management plan. Together, they negotiate a plan that the patient is willing to follow and that works towards both sets of goals. A contractual agreement between patient and clinician may improve both clinical asthma control and patient health-related quality of life.

Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma

Asthma guidelines recommend an inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonist (beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist) as the preferred maintenance therapy for moderate and severe persistent asthma. Advair/Seretide Diskus also registered as Accuhaler is fixed-dose salmeterol (a long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonist) and fluticasone propionate (a corticosteroid) administered via a single powder inhalation device. The clinical effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma symptoms has been established in comparative clinical trials. Pharmacoeconomic analyses, based on data from these clinical trials, have been conducted from a healthcare payer perspective in various countries. In patients with asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroids, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was associated with more favourable (lower) cost-effectiveness ratios than fluticasone propionate monotherapy, oral montelukast plus inhaled fluticasone propionate, inhaled budesonide, and inhaled formoterol plus budesonide. As the initial maintenance therapy in patients with persistent asthma symptoms while receiving short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was cost effective relative to montelukast monotherapy. Although the total cost of asthma management tended to be slightly higher with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with fluticasone propionate or montelukast monotherapy, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate consistently had a more favourable cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of per successfully treated week or symptom-free day and/or was associated with small incremental costs to achieve significant additional clinical benefits. In clinical practice, salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate was associated with lower asthma-related costs than treatment with other maintenance therapies.In patients with asthma symptoms despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate produced clinically meaningful improvements in overall Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores relative to salmeterol or placebo monotherapy, in emotional function domain scores relative to fluticasone propionate or budesonide, and in asthma symptoms domain scores relative to budesonide. In patients with persistent asthma symptoms while receiving short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate produced clinically meaningful improvements in overall AQLQ scores compared with fluticasone propionate or montelukast.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacoeconomic analyses indicate that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate administered via a single inhaler represents a cost-effective treatment option (relative to fluticasone propionate at the same nominal dosage, budesonide, formoterol plus budesonide and montelukast plus fluticasone propionate) in patients with asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In patients with asthma not controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists alone, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is a cost effective treatment relative to monotherapy with montelukast. Importantly, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is also associated with improvements in health-related quality of life.

Efficacy of inhaled budesonide and oral theophylline in asthmatic subjects

The aim of present study was to evaluate clinical, functional, and anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled budesonide and oral theophylline treatments in patients with mild to moderate asthma. The study included 38 patients. After a 10-day run-in period, the patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group 1 received inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) 800 microg/day for 4 weeks. Group 2 received oral theophylline (Talotren tablets, 200 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks. Inhaled budesonide therapy was accompanied by a significant decrease in serum interleukin (IL)-5 levels (p < 0.0005) and blood, sputum, and nasal eosinophil counts (p < 0.005). It produced a significant reduction in daytime (p < 0.01) and nighttime (p < 0.005) symptom scores and an increase in morning (p < 0.005) and evening (p < 0.05) peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in I sec (FEV1) values (p < 0.01). Theophylline therapy was associated with a significant decrease in blood (p < 0.02) and nasal (p < 0.01) eosinophil counts and serum IL-5 levels (p < 0.01). It resulted in significant improvements in daytime and nighttime symptom scores (p < 0.05), and morning PEF and FEV1 values (p < 0.05). These changes were more significant in group I than in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to post-treatment values. Our results confirm the role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma and are consistent with the recommendation that theophylline exerts an anti-inflammatory effect. Further studies should be conducted to determine long-term benefits of theophylline.

The Legs For Life Screening for Peripheral Vascular Disease: results of a prospective study designed to improve patient compliance with physician recommendations

PURPOSE

To determine how compliance with recommendations made by physicians during the 2000 Legs For Life National Screening for Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) and Leg Pain is affected through the use of (i) simple and concise patient information and recommendation cards and (ii) a "targeted" postscreening follow-up plan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were initially screened for PVD by completion of the Legs For Life Risk Factor Assessment form and determination of bilateral ankle/brachial indexes (ABIs). Each patient then met with an interventional radiologist or vascular surgeon. Patients with normal ABIs (>1.0 bilaterally) or mildly abnormal ABIs (<1.0 but >0.90) were classified as having no risk and low risk, respectively. Patients with ABIs of 0.70-0.89 were classified as having moderate risk for PVD and patients with ABIs <0.69 were classified as having high risk for PVD. Physicians reviewed the Risk Factor Assessment form with each patient and made specific lifestyle improvement recommendations. For the year 2000 screening, patients classified at moderate and high risk for PVD received special instructions and a card containing clearly printed information on the purpose of the Legs For Life screening, their level of risk for PVD, specific recommendations for follow-up, and phone numbers to call to help arrange for that follow-up. Two weeks after the screening, a second copy of this card was mailed to each moderate- and high-risk assessed patient. Four months later, each of these patients was contacted by telephone to determine if they had pursued additional care or testing.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients were screened, 42 (23%) of whom were determined to be at moderate or high risk for PVD. Four months after the screening, 39 (93%) of these patients were available for follow-up. Twenty (51%) patients had received no further medical advice or treatment. Nineteen (49%) patients had pursued further medical care which included physician consultation (n = 19; 100%), noninvasive Doppler evaluation (n = 10; 26%), diagnostic arteriography (n = 2; 5%), initiation of pharmacologic therapy for claudication (n = 1; 3%), percutaneous intervention (n = 1; 3%), or vascular surgery (n = 1; 3%). Seventeen of 39 patients (44%) reported that claudication-type leg pain was still a concern and/or lifestyle-limiting problem.

CONCLUSION

Patients can be provided with problem-focused information and succinct physician recommendations at and soon after a screening for PVD, which can contribute to enhanced patient compliance. However, a host of personal, social, health, and physician-related issues still prevent a large percentage of patients from achieving relief of PVD-associated leg pain.

History and future perspectives of treating asthma as a systemic and small airways disease

Asthma is an inflammatory disorder in which the small airways of the lung play an important role. There is also evidence for the systemic nature of asthma. No current method adequately measures small airways function alone. Therefore, a combination of functional and clinical parameters should be used to ensure that patients with asthma are adequately treated with due consideration of the small airways. Previously therapeutic strategies have focused on bronchodilation and attenuation of airway inflammation. While early oral therapies had the advantage of reaching the small airways and treating the systemic aspect of asthma, they were associated with serious side-effects. Inhaled therapies were therefore developed to limit these effects. However, inhaled therapies have the disadvantage of limited penetration into the peripheral airways and an inability to treat the systemic component of asthma. They are also associated with local and systemic side-effects. The future for asthma treatment is likely to be a systemically administered medication with few side-effects targeting disease-specific mediators. The leukotriene receptor antagonists and anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies are examples of such therapies and the emergence of other new strategies is awaited.