Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in childhood asthma: correlation with disease severity

Urinary eosinophil-derived neurotoxin is associated with reduced lung function in pediatric asthma

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a biomarker for eosinophilic activation. Urinary (u) EDN may allow non-invasive monitoring of asthma, but clinical recommendations are lacking. We assessed the potential of uEDN as a marker of disease activity in pediatric asthma.

METHODS

We assessed urine samples of 371 children from the German ALLIANCE study cohort, from which we had: 169 preschool wheezers (<6 years), 80 asthmatics (≥6 years), and 122 healthy controls using the ImmunoCAP™ EDN Assay. Creatinine (Cr)-adjusted uEDN values were analyzed using correlations, association tests, (non) parametric statistics, multiple linear, and multivariable regression.

RESULTS

uEDN/uCr values were higher in atopic versus non-atopic preschool-aged subjects (p = .035) and associated with the sum of allergen-specific IgE in younger (r = 0.24, p = .003), and older subjects (r = 0.23, p = .043). uEDN/uCr was marginally a good determinant for atopy (p = .078, for subjects aged <6 years, and p = .058 for subjects ≥6 years). Children with the T2-high phenotype had higher uEDN/uCr (p < .001) versus T2-low-irrespective of using uEDN/uCr or blood eosinophils in combination to allergen sIgE for disease phenotyping. uEDN/uCr significantly correlated with reduced lung function among asthmatics (FEV1 z-scores: r = -0.30, p = .007, and FEV1/FVC z-scores: r = -0.24, p = .038). Using multivariable modeling, uEDN/uCr was an independent determinant of FEV1 (p = .038), and to a lesser extent, FEV1/FVC (p = .080).

CONCLUSIONS

uEDN/uCr may serve as a non-invasive biomarker for clinical features such as lung function in pediatric asthma. We highlight the utility of uEDN/uCr as a biomarker that can be easily assessed using widely available robust diagnostic immunoassays.

Eosinophils-from cradle to grave: An EAACI task force paper on new molecular insights and clinical functions of eosinophils and the clinical effects of targeted eosinophil depletion

Over the past years, eosinophils have become a focus of scientific interest, especially in the context of their recently uncovered functions (e.g. antiviral, anti-inflammatory, regulatory). These versatile cells display both beneficial and detrimental activities under various physiological and pathological conditions. Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases which can be classified into primary (clonal) and secondary (reactive) disorders and idiopathic (hyper)eosinophilic syndromes. Depending on the biological specimen, the eosinophil count in different body compartments may serve as a biomarker reflecting the underlying pathophysiology and/or activity of distinct diseases and as a therapy-driving (predictive) and monitoring tool. Personalized selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy directly or indirectly targeting the increased number and/or activity of eosinophils should be based on the understanding of eosinophil homeostasis including their interactions with other immune and non-immune cells within different body compartments. Hence, restoring as well as maintaining homeostasis within an individual's eosinophil pool is a goal of both specific and non-specific eosinophil-targeting therapies. Despite the overall favourable safety profile of the currently available anti-eosinophil biologics, the effect of eosinophil depletion should be monitored from the perspective of possible unwanted consequences.

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels in early childhood and association with preschool asthma - A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is related to childhood asthma, while normal values are lacking. We aimed to document serum EDN levels at 1 and 3 years in general and in non-atopic children, and explore if EDN levels differed by sex or were associated with preschool asthma at 3 years.

METHODS

From the PreventADALL birth cohort, we included 1233 children with EDN analysed using ImmunoCAP at 1 and/or 3 years. Non-atopic children had no history of wheeze, asthma, allergic sensitization or atopic dermatitis. Preschool asthma was defined as having ≥3 episodes of bronchial obstruction between 2 and 3 years, plus doctor diagnosed asthma and/or asthma medication use by 3 years. The upper limit of normal (ULN) of EDN was defined as the 95th percentile. With Youden Index we calculated EDN cut-off levels for risk of preschool asthma.

RESULTS

The overall median (ULN) EDN levels were 27.4 (121) μg/L at 1 year (n = 787), and 20.1 (87.8) μg/L at 3 years (n = 857). Non-atopic children had EDN levels of 24.0 (107) μg/L at 1 year (n = 147), and 17.3 (84.6) μg/L at 3 years (n = 173). EDN levels were higher in boys compared to girls; 32.0 (133) versus 24.5 (97.0) μg/L at 1 year, and 20.9 (96.3) versus 19.0 (72.4) μg/L at 3 years. Preschool asthma was observed in 109/892 (12.2%) children. Higher EDN levels at 1 (>26.7 μg/L) and 3 (≥20.5 μg/L) years were associated with preschool asthma; adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.20 (1.09, 4.41) and 4.68 (2.29, 9.55), respectively.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We report EDN values in early childhood, demonstrating higher levels at 1 compared to 3 years and in boys compared to girls at both ages. Higher EDN levels at both ages were associated with preschool asthma. However, EDN cut-off levels for preschool asthma were overall lower than the ULN of non-atopic children, limiting translation into clinical practice.

New insights into the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets of asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis

Asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP) are chronic respiratory diseases. These two disorders often co-exist based on common anatomical, immunological, histopathological, and pathophysiological basis. Usually, asthma with comorbid CRSwNP is driven by type 2 (T2) inflammation which predisposes to more severe, often intractable, disease. In the past two decades, innovative technologies and detection techniques in combination with newly introduced targeted therapies helped shape our understanding of the immunological pathways underlying inflammatory airway diseases and to further identify several distinct clinical and inflammatory subsets to enhance the development of more effective personalized treatments. Presently, a number of targeted biologics has shown clinical efficacy in patients with refractory T2 airway inflammation, including anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab)/anti-IL5R (benralizumab), anti-IL-4R-α (anti-IL-4/IL-13, dupilumab), and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab). In non-type-2 endotypes, no targeted biologics have consistently shown clinical efficacy so far. Presently, multiple therapeutical targets are being explored including cytokines, membrane molecules and intracellular signalling pathways to further expand current treatment options for severe asthma with and without comorbid CRSwNP. In this review, we discuss existing biologics, those under development and share some views on new horizons.

Clinical Potential of Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin in Asthma Management

The assessment and management of patients with asthma is challenging because of the complexity of the underlying inflammatory mechanisms and heterogeneity of their clinical presentation. Optimizing disease management requires therapy individualization that should rely on reliable biomarkers to unravel the phenotypes and endotypes of asthma. The secretory activity and turnover of eosinophils, as assessed by measuring eosinophil-derived proteins, may provide an accurate and complementary tool that mirrors the eosinophil activation status. Emerging evidence suggests that eosinophil-derived neurotoxin has considerable potential as a precision medicine biomarker. In this review, we explore the suitability of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin as a biomarker in asthma management, with particular emphasis on its clinical significance in the management of both pediatric and adult populations.

The role of human ribonuclease A family in health and diseases: A systematic review

The ribonuclease A (RNase A) family is one of the best-characterized vertebrate-specific proteins. In humans, eight catalytically active RNases (numbered 1–8) have been identified and have unique tissue distributions. Apart from the digestion of dietary RNA, a broad range of biological actions, including the regulation of intra- or extra-cellular RNA metabolism as well as antiviral, antibacterial, and antifungal activities, neurotoxicity, promotion of cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and immunomodulatory abilities, have been recently reported for the members of this family. Based on multiple biological roles, RNases are found to participate in the pathogenic processes of many diseases, such as infection, immune dysfunction, neurodegeneration, cancer, and cardiovascular disorders. This review summarizes the available data on the human RNase A family and illustrates the significant roles of the eight canonical RNases in health and disease, for stimulating further basic research and development of ideas on the potential solutions for disease diagnosis and treatment.

Asthma and Allergy: Unravelling a Tangled Relationship with a Focus on New Biomarkers and Treatment

Asthma is a major driver of health care costs across ages. Despite widely disseminated asthma-treatment guidelines and a growing variety of effective therapeutic options, most patients still experience symptoms and/or refractoriness to standard of care treatments. As a result, most patients undergo a further intensification of therapy to optimize symptom control with a subsequent increased risk of side effects. Raising awareness about the relevance of evaluating aeroallergen sensitizations in asthmatic patients is a key step in better informing clinical practice while new molecular tools, such as the component resolved diagnosis, may be of help in refining the relationship between sensitization and therapeutic recommendations. In addition, patient care should benefit from reliable, easy-to-measure and clinically accessible biomarkers that are able to predict outcome and disease monitoring. To attain a personalized asthma management and to guide adequate treatment decisions, it is of paramount importance to expand clinicians' knowledge about the tangled relationship between asthma and allergy from a molecular perspective. Our review explores the relevance of allergen testing along the asthma patient's journey, with a special focus on recurrent wheezing children. Here, we also discuss the unresolved issues regarding currently available biomarkers and summarize the evidence supporting the eosinophil-derived neurotoxin as promising biomarker.

Increase in eosinophil-derived neurotoxin level in school children with allergic disease

Background

Eosinophils are major effector cells of allergic disease and excellent markers of eosinophilic inflammation. Accurate and reliable biomarkers are helpful in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of allergic disease.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate an alternate marker of eosinophilic inflammation, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), in a number of allergic diseases.

Methods

Three hundred ninety-six elementary school-age children with various allergic conditions were recruited for this study. Subgroups included food allergies (FAs), atopic dermatitis (AD), bronchial asthma (BA), and allergic rhinitis (AR). EDN levels in these groups were compared to those in 93 healthy controls (HC).

Results

All subjects with allergic disease had elevated levels of serum EDN (median [interquartile range]: FA, 124.2 ng/mL [59.13–160.5 ng/mL]; AD, 110.8 ng/mL [57.52–167.9 ng/mL]; BA, 131.5 ng/mL [60.60–171.0 ng/mL]; AR, 91.32 ng/mL [46.16–145.0 ng/mL]) compared to HC (38.38 ng/mL [32.40–55.62 ng/mL]) (p < 0.0001). These elevated levels were consistent throughout the age range (6–12 years) of the healthy study subjects (p = 0.0679). EDN levels also correlated well with total immunoglobulin E (Rs = 0.5599, p < 0.0001). Looking at all individuals with an allergic disease, the area under the curve was 0.790.

Conclusions

Direct measures of eosinophilic inflammation are needed for accurate diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of allergic diseases. EDN may be a worthy biomarker of eosinophil activity and a useful screening tool for allergic diseases including FA, AD, BA, and AR.

Blood eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin are associated with different asthma expression and evolution in adults

BACKGROUND

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) are proteins released by activated eosinophils whose role in adult asthma remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To study associations between ECP, EDN and various asthma characteristics in adults from the Epidemiological Study on the Genetics and Environment of Asthma (EGEA).

METHODS

Plasma ECP and EDN levels were measured by ELISA. Cross-sectional analyses were performed in 941 adults (43±16 years old, 39% with asthma) at EGEA2 (2003-2007). Longitudinal analyses investigated the associations between EDN level at EGEA2 and changes in asthma characteristics between EGEA2 and EGEA3 (2011-2013, n=817). We used generalised estimated equations adjusted for age, sex, smoking status and body mass index to take into account familial dependence.

RESULTS

At EGEA2, both high ECP and EDN levels were associated with current asthma (adjusted OR (aOR) (95% CI): 1.69 (1.35-2.12) and 2.12 (1.76-2.57)). Among asthmatics, high EDN level was associated with asthma attacks (aOR: 1.50 (1.13-1.99)), wheezing and breathlessness (aOR: 1.38 (1.05-1.80)), use of asthma treatments (aOR: 1.91 (1.37-2.68)) and bronchial hyper-responsiveness (aOR: 2.03 (1.38-2.97)), even after further adjustment on ECP. High ECP level was associated with high neutrophil count and tended to be associated with chronic bronchitis. High EDN level at EGEA2 was associated with persistent asthma (aOR: 1.62 (1.04-2.52)), nocturnal symptoms (aOR from 2.19 to 3.57), worsening wheezing and breathlessness (aOR: 1.97 (1.36-2.85)) and nocturnal shortness of breath (aOR: 1.44 (1.04-1.98)) between EGEA2 and EGEA3.

CONCLUSIONS

EDN and ECP were associated with different asthma expression in adults. EDN could be a potential biomarker to monitor asthma evolution in adults.

Biomarkers for Severe Asthma: Lessons From Longitudinal Cohort Studies

Severe asthma (SA) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by uncontrolled symptoms, frequent exacerbations, and lung function decline. The discovery of phenotypes and endotypes of SA significantly improves our understanding of its pathophysiology and allows the advent of biologics blocking multiple molecular targets. The advances have mainly been made in type 2-high asthma associated with elevated type 2 inflammatory biomarkers such as immunoglobulin E (IgE), interleukins (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Previous clinical trials have demonstrated that type 2 biomarkers, including blood/sputum eosinophils and the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), were correlated to severe airway inflammation, persistent symptoms, frequent exacerbations, and the clinical efficacy of these biomarkers in predicting treatment outcomes of type 2-targeting biologics. However, it is well known that type 2 inflammation is partially attributable to the pathogenesis of SA. Although some recent studies have suggested that type 2-low and mixed phenotypes of asthma are important contributors to the heterogeneity of SA, many questions about these non-type 2 asthma phenotypes remain to be solved. Consequently, many efforts to investigate and find novel biomarkers for SA have also made in their methods. Many cross-sectional experimental studies in large-scale cohorts and randomized clinical trials have proved their value in understanding SA. More recently, real-world cohort studies have been in the limelight for SA research, which is unbiased and expected to give us an answer to the unmet needs of the heterogeneity of SA.

Performance of Eosinophil Cationic Protein as a Biomarker in Asthmatic Children

BACKGROUND

Although blood eosinophils are a frequently used marker of type 2 inflammation in children with asthma, their sensitivity is relatively poor. Additional markers of type 2 inflammation are needed.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that plasma concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), a marker of eosinophil activation, would be useful for detection of type 2 inflammation and would predict poorer asthma outcomes over 1 year.

METHODS

Children and adolescents 6 through 17 years (N = 256) with confirmed asthma completed a baseline visit and a follow-up visit at 12 months. A subset also underwent systemic corticosteroid responsiveness testing with intramuscular triamcinolone. Outcome measures at 12 months included uncontrolled asthma, lung function, and asthma exacerbations treated with systemic corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Plasma ECP concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 413.61 ng/mL (median, 6.95 ng/mL) and were consistently associated with other markers of type 2 inflammation. At baseline, children in the highest ECP tertile had poorer asthma control, more airflow limitation, and more exacerbations, but also had greater symptom improvement with intramuscular triamcinolone. At 12 months, associations between the highest ECP tertile and exacerbations, but not lung function or asthma control, persisted after covariate adjustment. However, the sensitivity of ECP was modest and was not markedly different from that of blood eosinophil counts.

CONCLUSION

Plasma ECP concentrations may be a useful marker of type 2 inflammation in children and may help identify those children at highest risk for recurrent exacerbations who could benefit from corticosteroid treatment. However, additional markers may be needed to improve sensitivity for outcome detection.

Montelukast use over the past 20 years: monitoring of its effects and safety issues

Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, was launched 20 years ago in Korea. It is recommended as an alternative treatment for asthma in children with mild persistent symptoms or as an add-on treatment to existing low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in children who require additional treatment. However, in the real-world setting, many doctors and patients prefer montelukast over ICSs despite their lower efficacy. Although montelukast is considered to be a safe drug, there are concerns regarding adverse drug reactions, including the rare occurrence of Churg-Strauss syndrome and, despite insufficient data, the possibility of neuropsychiatric events such as anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and suicidality. This review identified that montelukast has significantly contributed to asthma control over the past 20 years in Korea and has been critical for reducing asthma severity, especially early wheezing and disease control. Our findings suggest that the effects of montelukast treatment can be monitored by measuring serum eosinophilderived neurotoxin levels.

Serum Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin Better Reflect Asthma Control Status Than Blood Eosinophil Counts

BACKGROUND

Although several biomarkers have been proposed for eosinophilic asthma, biomarkers for reflecting asthma control status remain controversial. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), a degranulated eosinophil protein, is an emerging biomarker in asthmatic patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed serum EDN concentrations in asthmatics and compared its performance with that of blood eosinophil count as an indicator of asthma control status.

METHODS

We enrolled 75 uncontrolled asthmatics, 56 controlled asthmatics, and 43 healthy controls from Asan Medical Center. Serum EDN levels (ng/mL) were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The predictability of EDN for asthma control status was analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the performances of a serum EDN level and blood eosinophil count as indicators of uncontrolled asthma status.

RESULTS

The mean serum EDN level in the uncontrolled asthma group was higher than that in the controlled asthma and healthy groups (103.2 ± 60.2 vs 60.8 ± 49.7 vs 49.6 ± 28.3 ng/mL, P < .001). Serum EDN level was the significant parameter related to asthma control status in univariate and multivariable analysis (both P < .001). Serum EDN levels correlated with blood eosinophil counts (r = 0.510, P < .001). However, in the ROC analysis, serum EDN level showed a significantly better performance for predicting uncontrolled asthma status (area under the curve, 0.726 vs 0.628, P = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum EDN levels significantly differed between patients with controlled and uncontrolled status in adult asthmatics. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify EDN as a better indicator of asthma control status than blood eosinophil count.

Poor Correlation of Oral Swabs with Esophageal Eosinophil Counts

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic condition that requires repeated endoscopies/biopsies to track the disease and treatment response. This invasive procedure involves risk to the patient and has significant costs. We studied whether the detection of specific proteins (cytokines and eosinophil degranulation products) from oral swabs could serve as a minimally invasive test for EoE. Swabs of the oral cavity (buccal and oropharyngeal) were obtained prior to endoscopy/biopsies in patients with EoE, possible EoE, and non-EoE patients in addition to obtaining additional esophageal biopsy tissue. ELISAs measuring the levels of cytokines IL-5, IL-8, IL-13, and eosinophil degranulation products including major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil derived neurotoxin (EDN), and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) were performed on the samples. Comparisons were made to peak esophageal eosinophil counts. Tolerability of the swabs was evaluated. 43 patients, 4-17 years old, participated in the study. Swabs were well tolerated and all showed measurable protein. 26 patients had EoE [14 active (> 15 eosinophils/high power field), 12 non-active], 17 patients did not have EoE. Results obtained from oral swabs showed poor correlation with those from esophageal tissue. Only measurement of eosinophil degranulation products EDN and EPO from esophageal tissues showed strong correlations with eosinophil counts. In this study, the levels of cytokines and eosinophil degranulation products detected from oral swabs did not correlate with esophageal eosinophilia, and their detection would be insufficient to displace endoscopy/biopsies.

Immunological biomarkers in severe asthma

Severe asthma is heterogeneous in its clinical presentation, underlying pathophysiology, course and response to therapy. Clinical and physiological assessment of severe asthma is often inadequate in predicting underlying disease mechanisms and or response to medications. With the emergence of novel targeted therapies in severe asthma, the need for reproducible, easily measured biomarkers became obvious but only few are currently available for clinical use. These biomarkers along with the clinical presentation of the patient play an important role in identifying phenotypes and endotypes, predicting the clinical course and prognosis and improving the precision therapeutic approach to asthma.

Comparison of serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels between wheezing and non-wheezing groups in children with respiratory tract infection

Objective: Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is associated with recurrent wheezing episodes after bronchiolitis, childhood asthma, and allergic rhinitis. We investigated if there is a measurable difference between serum EDN levels in children with wheezing and non-wheezing respiratory infections.Methods: 171 children who visited a university hospital with respiratory infections were enrolled in the study. Subjects were divided into two groups: wheezing (n = 46) and non-wheezing (n = 125). Serum EDN levels were compared.Results: Serum EDN levels in the wheezing group were significantly higher than in the non-wheezing group (P < 0.001). The non-wheezing group was divided into three sub-groups: pneumonia, common cold, and tonsillitis. Serum EDN levels in the wheezing group were significantly higher than in the pneumonia, common cold, or tonsillitis subgroups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in serum EDN levels among the pneumonia, common cold, and tonsillitis subgroups.Conclusions: These findings suggest that elevated serum EDN levels could be a distinctive feature of respiratory infections with wheezing. EDN's utility as a biomarker for wheezing-associated disease should be explored through further study.

Biomarkers for Recurrent Wheezing and Asthma in Preschool Children

Wheezing is one of the characteristic symptoms of asthma, but all preschool children with wheezing are not diagnosed with asthma. Preschool children are not cooperative enough to participate in spirometry and invasive tests. Thus, there is no conventional method to diagnose asthma in preschool children. We reviewed studies on non-invasive biomarkers for assessing asthma in preschool children. Specimens that can be easily obtained by non-invasive methods are blood, exhaled breath and urine. Eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in blood are helpful in evaluating eosinophilic inflammation of the airways. Exhaled breath contains nitric oxide, volatile organic compounds, various cytokines and mediators as analytical components. Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide has been used to assess the degree of eosinophil inflammation and has been standardized in school-age children and adults, but not yet in preschool children. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH and various cytokines/mediators that are detected in EBC seem to be promising biomarkers for assessing asthma, but need more standardization and validation. There are several biomarkers useful for assessing asthma, but none are ideal. Some biomarkers need standardized methods of obtaining samples from uncooperative preschool children for clinical use and require sufficient validation. Recently, another activated eosinophil marker, serum EDN, has shown promising results as a biomarker for recurrent wheezing and asthma in preschool children.

Serum Levels of Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin: A Biomarker for Asthma Severity in Adult Asthmatics

Purpose

Eosinophilic inflammation is a key component of severe asthma (SA). However, there has been no reliable serum biomarker for the eosinophilic inflammation of SA. We hypothesized that serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) could predict the eosinophilic inflammation of SA in adult asthmatics.

Methods

Severe asthmatics (n = 235), nonsevere asthmatics (n = 898), and healthy controls (n = 125) were enrolled from Ajou University Hospital, South Korea. The serum levels of EDN and periostin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared between severe and nonsevere asthmatics. Their associations with total eosinophil count (TEC) and clinical parameters were evaluated; clinical validation of the K-EDN kit for the measurement of serum EDN was evaluated.

Results

Severe asthmatics were older and had longer disease duration with significantly lower levels of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and methacholine PC20 than nonsevere asthmatics. Significant differences were found in TEC or sputum eosinophil count (%) between the groups. The serum levels of EDN and periostin were significantly higher in severe asthmatics than in nonsevere asthmatics and in healthy controls (all P < 0.05). Although significant correlations were found between serum EDN levels measured by the 2 kits (ρ = 0.545, P < 0.0001), higher correlation coefficients between serum EDN levels measured by the K-EDN kit and TEC were higher (ρ = 0.358, P < 0.0001) than those between serum EDN levels measured by the MBL kit and TEC (ρ = 0.319, P < 0.0001) or serum periostin level (ρ = 0.222, P < 0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that serum EDN levels measured by the K-EDN kit predicted the phenotype of SA (P = 0.003), while 2 other biomarkers did not.

Conclusions

The serum EDN level may be a useful biomarker for assessing asthma severity in adult asthmatics.

Montelukast Reduces Serum Levels of Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin in Preschool Asthma

PURPOSE

Several markers for eosinophilic inflammation have been proposed to predict response to asthma treatment. However, definitive criteria for treatment decisions have not yet been established. We investigate a potentially useful relatively non-invasive biomarker, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), to predict favorable responses to budesonide or montelukast, common treatment for children with asthma.

METHODS

Young children (1 to 6 years old) were enrolled in this randomized, parallel, 2-group, open-label trial. Criteria for eligibility included: 1) being symptomatic during the run-in period; and 2) having a serum EDN (sEDN) level ≥ 53 ng/mL, with positive specific immunoglobulin E to house dust mite. Eligible patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: the BIS group received budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) 0.5 mg once daily; the MONT group received montelukast 4 mg once daily. Ineligible patients were invited to receive montelukast 4 mg once daily (OBS group). Treatment period was 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Asthma control days increased significantly in the BIS and MONT groups (P < 0.000) over the 12-week study period. There was no significant change in sEDN in the BIS group but there was a significant decrease in the MONT group (P < 0.000). Patients in the OBS group with high EDN levels (< 53 ng/mL) showed a significant decrease due to MONT treatment (P = 0.023). Rescue medication usage significantly decreased in the BIS and MONT groups (P < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

EDN is a useful relatively non-invasive biomarker for predicting responses to montelukast and budesonide treatment of preschool children with beta2-agonist responsive recurrent wheeze and multiple-trigger wheeze (Trial registry at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000008335).

Integrative approach identifies corticosteroid response variant in diverse populations with asthma

BACKGROUND

Although inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) medication is considered the cornerstone treatment for patients with persistent asthma, few ICS pharmacogenomic studies have involved nonwhite populations.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify genetic predictors of ICS response in multiple population groups with asthma.

METHODS

The discovery group comprised African American participants from the Study of Asthma Phenotypes and Pharmacogenomic Interactions by Race-Ethnicity (SAPPHIRE) who underwent 6 weeks of monitored ICS therapy (n = 244). A genome-wide scan was performed to identify single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants jointly associated (ie, the combined effect of the SNP and SNP × ICS treatment interaction) with changes in asthma control. Top associations were validated by assessing the joint association with asthma exacerbations in 3 additional groups: African Americans (n = 803 and n = 563) and Latinos (n = 1461). RNA sequencing data from 408 asthmatic patients and 405 control subjects were used to examine whether genotype was associated with gene expression.

RESULTS

One variant, rs3827907, was significantly associated with ICS-mediated changes in asthma control in the discovery set (P = 7.79 × 10^-8) and was jointly associated with asthma exacerbations in 3 validation cohorts (P = .023, P = .029, and P = .041). RNA sequencing analysis found the rs3827907 C-allele to be associated with lower RNASE2 expression (P = 6.10 × 10^-4). RNASE2 encodes eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, and the rs3827907 C-allele appeared to particularly influence ICS treatment response in the presence of eosinophilic inflammation (ie, high pretreatment eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels or blood eosinophil counts).

CONCLUSION

We identified a variant, rs3827907, that appears to influence response to ICS treatment in multiple population groups and likely mediates its effect through eosinophils.

Biomarkers for severe allergic asthma in children: could they be useful to guide disease control and use of omalizumab?

INTRODUCTION

Although symptom controls in asthmatic children can be achieved through compliant use of conventional medication, some children have uncontrolled severe persistent asthma, especially if they are allergic. For these children, omalizumab (approved by the EMA and FDA in children aged > 6 years) could be a therapeutic option. However, response to omalizumab varies from one child to another. Predictive biomarkers of omalizumab effectiveness could be useful to monitor response to treatment. Area covered: The authors searched in the PubMed database for publications related to the use of biomarkers in allergic asthma. Supported by their own experience in phenotyping asthma in children, they analyzed whether these biomarkers could be useful in assessing response to omalizumab. Expert commentary: Th2 inflammation in children with allergic asthma can be assessed by measuring several biomarkers (blood eosinophil, serum ECP or periostin, FeNO). While a single measurement may be insufficient, a combination of biomarkers assessments may improve the follow-up of children treated by omalizumab.

Clinicopathologic and gene expression analysis of initial biopsies from patients with eosinophilic esophagitis refractory to therapy

Some patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) do not respond to therapy. The clinicopathologic characteristics and gene expression profile at time of presentation could help predict response to therapy. Refractory EoE was defined as persistence of symptoms and biopsies with histologic features of EoE after 6 months of therapy with proton pump inhibitors and topical corticosteroids. Initial biopsies from refractory EoE patients (n=21), responder to therapy (n=8), patients who relapsed (n=6), and reflux controls (n=24) were studied. RNA was isolated from a subset of cases, and gene expression analysis of 285 genes involved in inflammation was performed using NanoString technology. There was no difference in the presenting symptoms among groups. The number of eosinophils/high-power field among nonresponders was higher (66±15) than responders (39±8; P<.0001) and similar to patients who relapsed (62±11). Six genes were expressed by at least 4-fold compared with reflux at a false discovery rate < 0.05, including overexpression of ALOX15, CCL26, FCER2, RTNLB, and RNASE2, and underexpression of DSG1. EoE patients refractory to therapy or who relapsed showed a trend toward higher ALOX15 expression compared with patients with good response to therapy (364.4- and 425-fold change, P=.097 and P=.07). RTNLB was significantly overexpressed in patients who were refractory to therapy versus those who responded favorably (10-fold versus 3-fold; P<.01). In conclusion, the number of eosinophils/high-power field in the initial biopsy inversely correlates with therapy response. Overexpression of RTNLB in refractory-to-therapy patients and overexpression of ALOX15 and CCL26 suggest that they are critical in the EoE pathogenesis.

Utility of serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) measurement by ELISA in young children with asthma

BACKGROUND

This study was done to compare the efficacy of a recently developed eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) ELISA kit ("BioTracer™ K^® EDN ELISA Kit") to a commercially available EDN ELISA kit ("MBL EDN ELISA Kit") and demonstrate the usefulness of serum EDN measurement in young asthmatic children.

METHODS

Forty-eight children with physician-diagnosed asthma (Asthma group) and 31 age-matched normal controls (Control group) were recruited from the Asthma and Allergy Center at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea from January 2010 to September of 2012. EDN levels in each serum specimen were measured 2 times using the: 1) BioTracer™ K^® EDN ELISA Kit and 2) MBL EDN ELISA Kit at the Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital laboratory. EDN level measurements in each serum specimen were compared.

RESULTS

EDN measurements from the BioTracer™ K^® EDN ELISA Kit correlated well with those from the MBL EDN ELISA Kit: r = 0.9472 at the Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital laboratory. These r values were considered both clinically relevant (i.e., r > 0.85) and statistically significant (p < 0.0001). EDN measurements from both kits positively correlated with asthma symptom severity (p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events occurred during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The BioTracer™ K^® EDN ELISA Kit was accurate and useful in measuring EDN levels in young asthma patient serum. Because of our kit's distinct advantages and utility, we suggest this kit can be used for the timely diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of asthma in asthma patients of all ages, especially those too young to perform pulmonary function tests.

Eosinophil protein X and childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: There are no reference guidelines for health care providers regarding appropriate use and interpretation of urine eosinophil protein X (u‐EPX) in clinical practice. Currently, there are no clear‐cut clinical or laboratory parameters to diagnose asthma in young children. Objective: In this study, we (1) systematically reviewed and qualitatively appraised the epidemiological evidence to determine diagnostic u‐EPX cut points for pediatric asthma, and (2) performed a meta‐analysis to provide u‐EPX estimates for diagnosing pediatric asthma. Methods: Research articles in literature were identified from PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases from 1966 to August 2015. Children <18 years of age were included. Both serum and urine EPX were included. Twenty‐seven studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and nine studies for the meta‐analysis. Details regarding EPX analyses, treatment efficacy, and outcomes were assessed. For meta‐analyses, effect estimates were abstracted using standardized means. Results: Over 70% of studies found a significant relationship between u‐EPX and childhood asthma. There was 1.94 times higher standardized means of u‐EPX among acute asthmatics compared to healthy controls (confidence interval [CI]: 1.67–2.22). Similarly, the difference in standardized means between asymptomatic asthmatics and healthy controls was 1.58 times higher (CI: 1.27–1.88). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Despite differences in sample sizes, EPX processing and measurement, and ages of children, a consistent trend of higher EPX levels with childhood asthma was revealed.

Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin (EDN/RNase 2) and the Mouse Eosinophil-Associated RNases (mEars): Expanding Roles in Promoting Host Defense

The eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN/RNase2) and its divergent orthologs, the mouse eosinophil-associated RNases (mEars), are prominent secretory proteins of eosinophilic leukocytes and are all members of the larger family of RNase A-type ribonucleases. While EDN has broad antiviral activity, targeting RNA viruses via mechanisms that may require enzymatic activity, more recent studies have elucidated how these RNases may generate host defense via roles in promoting leukocyte activation, maturation, and chemotaxis. This review provides an update on recent discoveries, and highlights the versatility of this family in promoting innate immunity.

Adult asthma biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A variety of novel asthma treatments have been developed based on phenotypes, and the clinical trial results show promising responses. This review summarizes the current knowledge of biomarkers for the determination of asthma phenotypes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Eosinophilic inflammation is the most focused phenotype because most novel asthma treatments have targeted T-helper type 2 (Th2) pathway. Fractional-exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a new method that represents an eosinophilic airway inflammation with a significant correlation with sputum eosinophilia and asthma severity instead of sputum eosinophil count that easily influenced by corticosteroid therapy. However, some reports indicated the discordance between treatment response or adjustment and FeNO levels. Serum periostin is a strong serum biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation and an indicator of Th2-targeted therapy (such as lebrikizumab or omalizumab) and airflow limitation. YKL-40 is associated with asthma severity and airway remodeling. In addition, genetic and metabolomic approaches have been made to determine asthma phenotypes and severity.

SUMMARY

Biomarkers such as FeNO and serum periostin represent eosinophilic airway inflammation, together with eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and osteopontin (OPN) needed more replication studies. Periostin, YKL-40, OPN and some metabolites (choline, arginine, acetone and protectin D1) are related to asthma severity and airflow limitation.

Biomarker sampling of the airways in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although there are several known methods by which to sample the upper and lower airways in asthmatic patients, new endpoints have emerged over the past few years from these sampling techniques that may be useful biomarkers. It is both timely and relevant that these endpoints be reviewed in the context of their role in asthma and hence as potential biomarkers in asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article will cover various upper and lower airway sampling methods, and the standard and specialized endpoints that can be derived from those methods. For the nasal airways, this will include nasal lavage, exhaled nasal nitric oxide and acoustic rhinometry. For the lower airways this will include induced sputum, bronchoscopy-based methods and exhaled breath.

SUMMARY

Some methodologies such as bronchoscopy remain limited in their widespread clinical application due to their invasive nature. Less invasive techniques such as electronic nose and breath condensate have potential biomarker application but still require standardization and additional study. It is clear, however, that despite the applicability of a given sampling technique, both routine (cells and cytokines) and specialized (genomic, phenotypic, hydration) endpoints are measurable and should be combined in clinical trial studies to yield maximum results in asthma.

Biomarkers of eosinophilic inflammation in asthma

Eosinophils are mediators of allergic inflammation and are implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous conditions including asthma, parasitic infections, neoplasms, hyper-eosinophilic syndromes, vasculitic disorders, and organ-specific conditions. Assessing eosinophilic inflammation is therefore important in establishing a diagnosis, in monitoring and assessing response to treatment, and in testing novel therapeutics. Clinical markers of atopy and eosinophilic inflammation include indirect tests such as lung function, exhaled breath condensate analysis, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, serum immunoglobulin E levels and serum periostin. Direct measures, which quantify but do not anatomically localise inflammation include blood eosinophil counts, serum or plasma eosinophil cationic protein and sputum eosinophil levels. Cytology from bronchoalveolar lavage and histology from endobronchial and transbronchial biopsies are better at localising inflammation but are more invasive. Novel approaches using radiolabelled eosinophils with single-photon emission computed tomography, offer the prospect of non-invasive methods to localise eosinophilic inflammation.

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels at 3 months post-respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis are a predictive biomarker of recurrent wheezing

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a predictive marker of recurrent wheezing episodes in post-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis.

METHODS

EDN levels and recurrent wheezing episodes were serially measured in 200 infants hospitalized with RSV bronchiolitis.

RESULTS

Serum EDN levels at 3 months correlated significantly with total wheezing episodes at 12 months in the RSV-PLC (n  = 71; r = 0.720, p < 0.0001) and RSV-MONT groups (n = 79; r = 0.531, p < 0.001). Positive predictive value of 3-mo EDN level for total wheezing episodes was 57%; negative predictive value, 76%; sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 62%.

CONCLUSION

EDN levels have predictive value for the development of recurrent wheezing post-RSV bronchiolitis.

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin: a novel biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of asthma

Asthma is associated with increased levels of eosinophils in tissues, body fluids, and bone marrow. Elevated levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) have been noted in asthma patients. Higher levels of EDN and ECP are also associated with exacerbated asthmatic conditions. Thus, EDN, along with ECP, may aid the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma. Several groups have suggested that EDN is more useful than ECP in evaluating disease severity. This may partially be because of the recoverability of EDN (not sticky, 100% recovery rate), as ECP is a sticky and more highly charged protein. In terms of clinical utility, EDN level is a more accurate biomarker than ECP when analyzing the underlying pathophysiology of asthma. As a monitoring tool, EDN has shown good results in children with asthma as well as other allergic diseases. In children too young to fully participate in lung function tests, EDN levels may be useful as an alter native measurement of eosinophilic inflammation. EDN can also be used in adult patients and in multiple specimen types (e.g., serum, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and nasal lavage fluid). These results are repeatable and reproducible. In conclusion, EDN may be a novel biomarker for the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of asthma/allergic disease.

Infection, eosinophilia and childhood asthma

There is a growing list of viruses and bacteria associated with wheezing illness and asthma. It is well known that a few of these pathogens are strongly associated with wheezing illness and asthma exacerbations. What is not known is if early childhood infections with these pathogens cause asthma, and, if so, exactly what are the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind its development. The current consensus is respiratory infection works together with allergy to produce the immune and physiologic conditions necessary for asthma diasthesis. One link between respiratory infection and asthma may be the eosinophil, a cell that plays prominently in asthma and allergy, but can also be found in the body in response to infection. In turn, the eosinophil and its associated products may be novel therapeutic targets, or at the very least used to elucidate the complex pathophysiologic pathways of asthma and other respiratory illnesses. Together or separately, they can also be used for diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. The optimal care of a patient must take into consideration not only symptoms, but also the underlying disease mechanisms.

Eosinophil degranulation is more important than eosinophilia in identifying asthma in chronic cough

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether eosinophil degranulation is a distinctive feature of asthma and can distinguish between chronic cough patients with asthma and those without.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients, with a chronic cough for more than 1 month, and nine normal individuals (controls) were enrolled. Subjects were divided into two groups: one group with asthma and positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) (Asthma group, n = 18) and the other group without asthma and negative BHR (Non-Asthma group, n = 19). From induced sputum, total cell counts and differentials were determined. Myeloperoxidase levels were measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and major basic protein (MBP) levels were measured by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

The percentage of sputum eosinophils was increased in the Asthma (p < .001) and Non-Asthma (p < .05) groups compared with the Control group and when comparing the Asthma and Non-Asthma (p < .001) groups. Sputum EDN and MBP levels were increased in the Asthma group compared with the Non-Asthma (p < .05 and p < .05, respectively) and Control groups (p < .05 and p = .055, respectively). However, EDN and MBP levels were not increased in the Non-Asthma group compared with the Control group. The percentage of sputum eosinophils in the Asthma group correlated positively with sputum EDN (Rs = 0.921, p < .001) and MBP (Rs = 0.882, p < .0001) levels and negatively with maxΔFEV(1) (Rs = -0.501, p < .05) (FEV(1), forced expiratory volume in 1 second). Unexpectedly, the percentage of eosinophils in the Non-Asthma group did not correlate significantly with any of these markers. Increased EDN and MBP levels and significant correlations between the percentage of eosinophils and EDN and MBP were only observed in asthma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that eosinophil degranulation is more important than eosinophilia in identifying asthma.

Respiratory viruses, eosinophilia and their roles in childhood asthma

With the advent of highly sensitive and specific screening of respiratory specimens for viruses, new viruses are discovered, adding to the growing list of those associated with wheezing illness and asthma exacerbations. It is not known whether early childhood infections with these viruses cause asthma, and, if so, what exactly are the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind its development. The current consensus is that respiratory viral infection works together with allergy to produce the immune and physiologic conditions necessary for asthma diasthesis. One link between viruses and asthma may be the eosinophil, a cell that plays a prominent role in asthma and allergy, but can also be found in the body in response to viral infection. In turn, the eosinophil and its associated products may be novel therapeutic targets, or at the very least, used to elucidate the complex pathophysiologic pathways of asthma and other respiratory illnesses. Together or separately, they can be used for diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Not only symptoms, but also the underlying disease mechanisms must be taken into consideration for the optimal care of a patient.