Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist in pediatric and adolescent asthma patients, 2003-2011

The impact of FDA regulatory activities on incident dispensing of LABA-containing medication: 2005-2011

OBJECTIVE

Evidence of safety issues associated with long-acting beta₂-agonist (LABA) treatment has led to multiple regulatory activities by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on this class of medications. This study describes the impact of the regulatory activities on incident LABA-containing medication dispensing.

METHODS

A monthly rolling cohort of asthma patients who were eligible to initiate a LABA-containing product was created in the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database between January 2005 and June 2011. Cohorts of individuals who initiated LABA were examined for the changes in the proportions of single-ingredient to fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-LABA initiators, appropriate initiation of LABA-containing products, and use of controller medications. The impact of the 2005 and 2010 FDA regulatory activities associated with LABA-containing products was measured using interrupted time series with segmented regression.

RESULTS

LABA-containing product initiation was declining prior to the 2005 regulatory activities and continued to decline over the study period, accompanied by increased initiation of fixed dose ICS-LABA among LABA initiators. While the 2010 regulatory activities had no immediate impact on the proportion of LABA initiation in patients with prior controller medication dispensing and/or poor asthma control, there was an increasing positive trend toward LABA initiation in the appropriate patient population after the regulatory activities.

CONCLUSION

The 2005 and 2010 FDA regulatory activities likely had an impact on communicating the safety concerns of LABA products. However, the impact cannot be viewed independent of scientific publications, guidelines for asthma treatment and other regulatory activities.

The US Food and Drug Administration's drug safety recommendations and long-acting beta2-agonist dispensing pattern changes in adult asthma patients: 2003-2012

Background

Emerging safety issues associated with long-acting beta₂-agonist (LABA) have led to multiple regulatory activities by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2003, including Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) in 2010. These DSCs had three specific recommendations for the safe use of LABA products in adult asthma treatment.

Methods

We examined the initiation of LABA-containing products for adult asthma treatment using an intermittent time series approach in a claims database from 2003 to 2012. We assessed the alignment of dispensing patterns with the following 2010 FDA recommendations: 1) contraindicated use of single-ingredient (SI)-LABA without an asthma controller medication (ACM); 2) a LABA should only be used when asthma is not adequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or ACM; and 3) step-down asthma therapy (e.g., discontinue LABA) when asthma control is achieved.

Results

There were 477,922 adults (18–64 years old) dispensed a new LABA during 2003–2012. Among LABA initiators, patients who initiated an SI-LABA and who did “not” have an ACM dispensed on the same date decreased from >9% in 2003 (the initial labeling change) to <2% post 2010 DSCs (p-value <0.0001 in the segmented regression model). The proportion of asthma patients dispensed an ICS in 6 months prior to initiating LABA treatment did not increase. The proportion of patients with longer than 4 months of continuous treatment did not decrease over the study period.

Conclusion

Although the decrease in SI-LABA initiation is consistent with FDA’s recommendations, low ICS dispensing before initiating a LABA and LABA continuation practices require further efforts to move toward the recommended safe practices.

Changes in long-acting β-agonist utilization after the FDA's 2010 drug safety communication

PURPOSE

In February 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued new recommendations for the safe use of long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the FDA's 2010 safety advisory on LABA utilization.

METHODS

Using administrative data from the Oregon Medicaid program, we performed an interrupted time series regression to evaluate changes in the trend in new LABA prescriptions before and after the FDA's 2010 advisory. Trends in incident fills were examined among those with and without an asthma diagnosis code and previous respiratory controller medication use; trends were also assessed according to patient age.

FINDINGS

The average age of the 8646 study patients was 37 years, 53% had a diagnosis of asthma, 21% had no respiratory diagnosis, and 32% had not used a respiratory controller medication in the recent past. The trend in new LABA prescriptions declined by 0.09 new start per 10,000 patients per month (95% CI, -0.19 to -0.01) after the FDA's advisory. Among those with a diagnosis of asthma, there was an immediate drop of 0.48 (95% CI, -0.93 to -0.03) and a 0.10 (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.06) decline in the monthly rate of new starts per 10,000 patients. Immediately after the FDA's advisory, we observed a statistically significant 4.7% increase (95% CI, 0.8 to 8.7) in the proportion of new LABA starts with history of previous respiratory controller medication use. Utilization of LABAs did not change in those without a diagnosis of asthma.

IMPLICATIONS

The FDA's 2010 advisory was associated with modest reductions in LABA utilization overall and in ways highlighted in their recommendations.