The effect of dydrogesterone on premenstrual symptoms. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in general practice

A scoping review of hormonal clinical trials in menstrual cycle-related brain disorders: Studies in premenstrual mood disorder, menstrual migraine, and catamenial epilepsy

Cyclic variations in hormones during the normal menstrual cycle underlie multiple central nervous system (CNS)-linked disorders, including premenstrual mood disorder (PMD), menstrual migraine (MM), and catamenial epilepsy (CE). Despite this foundational mechanistic link, these three fields operate independently of each other. In this scoping review (N = 85 studies), we survey existing human research studies in PMD, MM, and CE to outline the exogenous experimental hormone manipulation trials conducted in these fields. We examine a broad range of literature across these disorders in order to summarize existing diagnostic practices and research methods, highlight gaps in the experimental human literature, and elucidate future research opportunities within each field. While no individual treatment or study design can fit every disease, there is immense overlap in study design and established neuroendocrine-based hormone sensitivity among the menstrual cycle-related disorders PMD, MM, and CE.

SCOPING REVIEW STRUCTURED SUMMARY

Background. The menstrual cycle can be a biological trigger of symptoms in certain brain disorders, leading to specific, menstrual cycle-linked phenomena such as premenstrual mood disorders (PMD), menstrual migraine (MM), and catamenial epilepsy (CE). Despite the overlap in chronicity and hormonal provocation, these fields have historically operated independently, without any systematic communication about methods or mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

Online databases were used to identify articles published between 1950 and 2021 that studied hormonal manipulations in reproductive-aged females with either PMD, MM, or CE. We selected N = 85 studies that met the following criteria: 1) included a study population of females with natural menstrual cycles (e.g., not perimenopausal, pregnant, or using hormonal medications that were not the primary study variable); 2) involved an exogenous hormone manipulation; 3) involved a repeated measurement across at least two cycle phases as the primary outcome variable.

CHARTING METHODS

After exporting online database query results, authors extracted sample size, clinical diagnosis of sample population, study design, experimental hormone manipulation, cyclical outcome measure, and results from each trial. Charting was completed manually, with two authors reviewing each trial.

RESULTS

Exogenous hormone manipulations have been tested as treatment options for PMD (N = 56 trials) more frequently than MM (N = 21) or CE (N = 8). Combined oral contraceptive (COC) trials, specifically those containing drospirenone as the progestin, are a well-studied area with promising results for treating both PMDD and MM. We found no trials of COCs in CE. Many trials test ovulation suppression using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa), and a meta-analysis supports their efficacy in PMD; GnRHa have been tested in two MM-related trials, and one CE open-label case series. Finally, we found that non-contraceptive hormone manipulations, including but not limited to short-term transdermal estradiol, progesterone supplementation, and progesterone antagonism, have been used across all three disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Research in PMD, MM, and CE commonly have overlapping study design and research methods, and similar effects of some interventions suggest the possibility of overlapping mechanisms contributing to their cyclical symptom presentation. Our scoping review is the first to summarize existing clinical trials in these three brain disorders, specifically focusing on hormonal treatment trials. We find that PMD has a stronger body of literature for ovulation-suppressing COC and GnRHa trials; the field of MM consists of extensive estrogen-based studies; and current consensus in CE focuses on progesterone supplementation during the luteal phase, with limited estrogen manipulations due to concerns about seizure provocation. We argue that researchers in any of these respective disciplines would benefit from greater communication regarding methods for assessment, diagnosis, subtyping, and experimental manipulation. With this scoping review, we hope to increase collaboration and communication among researchers to ultimately improve diagnosis and treatment for menstrual-cycle-linked brain disorders.

Dydrogesterone indications beyond menopausal hormone therapy: an evidence review and woman's journey

Dydrogesterone is an orally active synthetic progestogen, with a molecular structure similar to that of natural progesterone. As dydrogesterone does not inhibit ovulation at standard doses, is devoid of estrogenic or androgenic properties, and does not induce metabolic side effects, it is suitable for use throughout a woman's lifetime, from adolescence to older age, for conditions associated with altered levels of endogenous progesterone. Aside from its well established role as a component of menopausal hormone therapy, dydrogesterone is indicated in younger women for treatment of dysmenorrhea, irregular menstrual cycles, premenstrual syndrome, and threatened or recurrent miscarriage; and is effective as luteal phase support during assisted reproduction techniques. In this narrative review, evidence is examined for use of dydrogesterone across a range of disorders affecting menses and pregnancy. A case study woven into the review illustrates the clinical uses of dydrogesterone during a young woman's journey to become a mother.

Oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles: a new standard?

Oral dydrogesterone has been used for luteal phase support on an empirical basis since the early days of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Systematic comparisons of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesterone, so far considered to be the standard of care, started to appear in the middle 2000s. Recently, a large, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase III trial on the use of daily 30 mg oral dydrogesterone versus daily 600 mg micronized vaginal progesterone for LPS in IVF was published. This company-sponsored trial confirmed the efficacy findings from previous independent researchers and firmly established the noninferiority of daily 30 mg oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support. Despite oral administration and first pass through the liver, dydrogesterone was as well tolerated as vaginal progesterone in safety analyses. Moreover, no new fetal safety concerns have arisen from that trial. Given the widespread preference of women for an oral compound, dydrogesterone may well become the new standard for luteal phase support in fresh embryo transfer IVF cycles.

Vitamin D Supplementation for Premenstrual Syndrome-Related Mood Disorders in Adolescents with Severe Hypovitaminosis D

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) might become severe enough to interfere with normal interpersonal relationships. This study was planned to assess whether administration of vitamin D (200,000 IU at first, followed by 25,000 IU every 2 weeks) for a 4-month period might lessen the appearance and the intensity of mood disorders associated with PMS in young girls with severe hypovitaminosis D. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One hundred fifty-eight young girls (15-21 years old) with PMS-related severe symptoms of the emotional and cognitive domains and low serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OH-D) levels (≤10 ng/mL) were randomly assigned to two treatment groups and treated for 4 months with vitamin D (group 1; n = 80) or placebo (group 2; n = 78). Clinical and hormonal effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In patients from group 1, levels of vitamin D reached the normal range (35-60 ng/mL) after the first month and remained stable throughout the whole study. At the end of treatment, anxiety score decreased from 51 to 20 (P < .001 vs baseline); irritability score declined from 130 to 70 (P < .001 vs baseline). Crying easily and sadness decreased by a score of 41 and 51 to a score of 30 and 31, respectively (P < .001). For disturbed relationships, the score decreased from 150 to 70 (P < .001). Conversely, no appreciable changes were noted in symptom intensity from patients of group 2. The frequency of adverse events (nausea and constipation) was not different between participants of group 1 and group 2.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the present findings, vitamin D therapy can be proposed as a safe, effective, and convenient method for improving the quality of life in young women with severe hypovitaminosis D and concomitant mood disorders associated with PMS.

Use of dydrogesterone as a progestogen for oral contraception

Dydrogesterone is a potent orally active progestogen that has been used in clinical practice for over 40 years. Chemically, it belongs to the class of retrosteroids. Dydrogesterone is closely related to endogenous progesterone. It differs from most other synthetic progestogens in that it has no estrogenic, androgenic, glucocorticoid, or anabolic effects. The use of progestogens such as dydrogesterone is indicated in all cases of relative or absolute endogenous progesterone deficiency. Nowadays, dydrogesterone is mainly used in hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The present pilot study explored whether dydrogesterone could also be used as a progestogen for oral contraception. Given its highly favorable safety and tolerability profile, it would provide improvement over existing progestogens currently used in oral contraceptives (OCs). The results of this study indicate that dydrogesterone might indeed be a suitable candidate for use in oral contraception. This concept is currently being investigated further in two open-label phase II trials.

Cyclic progestin therapy for the management of mastopathy and mastodynia

The management of benign diseases of the breast aims to halt the progression of fibrocystic transformation and to eliminate the symptoms of pain and breast tenderness. Progestins can be used for this purpose. In a controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study we treated 31 women with mastopathy/mastodynia with the progestins medrogestone (10 mg/day) or dydrogesterone (10 mg/day) from day 14 to day 25 for six cycles. Before, during and at the end of therapy the following parameters were evaluated: subjective symptoms (pain, tenderness, impairment of daily activities), palpatory findings, sonographic diagnosis and sex hormone profiles. Cyclic administration of the low-dose progestins medrogestone and dydrogesterone proved to be an effective and safe treatment of mastodynia and mastopathy. The objective parameters palpatory findings and sonographic imaging of breast nodules and cysts improved in more than 50% of patients. Improvement was particularly marked in women with low progesterone levels in the second half of the cycle. After six treatment cycles, 75% of the patients treated with dydrogesterone and 86% of the patients treated with medrogestone were completely pain-free.

Efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in management of premenstrual syndrome: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome.

DESIGN

Systematic review of published randomised, placebo controlled trials.

STUDIES REVIEWED

10 trials of progesterone therapy (531 women) and four trials of progestogen therapy (378 women).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of women whose symptoms showed improvement with progesterone preparations (suppositories and oral micronised). Proportion of women whose symptoms showed improvement with progestogens. Secondary analysis of efficacy of progesterone and progestogens in managing physical and behavioural symptoms.

RESULTS

Overall standardised mean difference for all trials that assessed efficacy of progesterone (by both routes of administration) was -0.028 (95% confidence interval -0.017 to -0.040). The odds ratio was 1.05 (1.03 to 1.08) in favour of progesterone, indicating no clinically important difference between progesterone and placebo. For progestogens the overall standardised mean was -0.036 (-0.014 to -0.060), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 1.07 (1.03 to 1.11) showing a statistically, but not clinically, significant improvement for women taking progestogens.

CONCLUSION

The evidence from these meta-analyses does not support the use of progesterone or progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome.

The treatment of late luteal phase dysphoric disorder

This mini-review provides a comprehensive discussion of the management of the late luteal phase dysphoric disorder (LLPDD). The various treatments will be described with particular attention to their efficacy and the nature of side effects. These include: psychoactive drugs (lithium, anxiolytics, antidepressants), nutritional agents (L-tryptophan, Vitamin B6, prostaglandins precursors and inhibitors), dopamine agonists, diuretics, antihypertensives, hormonal interventions (gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues, oestradiol, tamoxifen, progesterone, danazol, and oral contraceptives). Less attention has been given to non-pharmacologic approaches such as diet, exercise and psychotherapy. The availability of an operational definition of LLPDD in the DSM-III-R and the improvement in research methodology has provided a clearer direction for clinical management and for future investigations.