Chest radiography in the follow-up of breast cancer

Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Follow-up examinations are commonly performed after primary treatment for women with breast cancer. They are used to detect recurrences at an early (asymptomatic) stage. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of different policies of follow-up for distant metastases on mortality, morbidity and quality of life in women treated for stage I, II or III breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

For this 2014 review update, we searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register (4 July 2014), MEDLINE (4 July 2014), Embase (4 July 2014), CENTRAL (2014, Issue 3), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (4 July 2014) and ClinicalTrials.gov (4 July 2014). References from retrieved articles were also checked.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of different policies of follow-up after primary treatment were reviewed for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility for inclusion in the review and risk of bias. Data were pooled in an individual patient data meta-analysis for the two RCTs testing the effectiveness of different follow-up schemes. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, tumour size and lymph node status.

MAIN RESULTS

Since 2000, one new trial has been published; the updated review now includes five RCTs involving 4023 women with breast cancer (clinical stage I, II or III).Two trials involving 2563 women compared follow-up based on clinical visits and mammography with a more intensive scheme including radiological and laboratory tests. After pooling the data, no significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.15, two studies, 2563 participants, high-quality evidence), or disease-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.00, two studies, 2563 participants, low-quality evidence) emerged. No differences in overall survival and disease-free survival emerged in subgroup analyses according to patient age, tumour size and lymph node status before primary treatment. In 1999, 10-year follow-up data became available for one trial of these trials, and no significant differences in overall survival were found. No difference was noted in quality of life measures (one study, 639 participants, high-quality evidence).The new included trial, together with a previously included trial involving 1264 women compared follow-up performed by a hospital-based specialist versus follow-up performed by general practitioners. No significant differences were noted in overall survival (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.78, one study, 968 participants, moderate-quality evidence), time to detection of recurrence (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.47, two studies, 1264 participants, moderate-quality evidence), and quality of life (one study, 356 participants, high-quality evidence). Patient satisfaction was greater among patients treated by general practitioners. One RCT involving 196 women compared regularly scheduled follow-up visits versus less frequent visits restricted to the time of mammography. No significant differences emerged in interim use of telephone and frequency of general practitioners's consultations.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review of RCTs conducted almost 20 years ago suggests that follow-up programs based on regular physical examinations and yearly mammography alone are as effective as more intensive approaches based on regular performance of laboratory and instrumental tests in terms of timeliness of recurrence detection, overall survival and quality of life.In two RCTs, follow-up care performed by trained and not trained general practitioners working in an organised practice setting had comparable effectiveness to that delivered by hospital-based specialists in terms of overall survival, recurrence detection, and quality of life.

Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Follow-up examinations are commonly performed after primary treatment for women with breast cancer. They are used to detect recurrences at an early (asymptomatic) stage.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of different policies of follow-up for distant metastases on mortality, morbidity and quality of life in women treated for stage I, II or III breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched, the Breast Cancer Group's specialized register (May 14, 2004), the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), Medline (January 1966 - May 2004) and EMBASE (1988 - May 2004). References from retrieved articles were also checked.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of different policies of follow-up after primary treatment were reviewed for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and eligibility for inclusion in the review. Data were pooled in an individual patient data meta-analysis for the two RCTs testing the effectiveness of different follow-up schemes. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, tumour size and lymph node status.

MAIN RESULTS

Four RCTs involving 3055 women with breast cancer (clinical stage I, II or III) were included. Two of these involving 2563 women compared follow-up based on clinical visits and mammography with a more intensive scheme including radiological and laboratory tests. After pooling the data, no significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.15) or disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.00) emerged. No differences in overall survival and disease-free survival emerged in subgroup analyses according to patient age, tumour size and lymph node status before primary treatment. In 1999, 10-year follow-up data became available for Rosselli Del Turco and no significant differences in overall survival were found. One RCT (296 women) compared follow-up performed by a hospital-based specialist to follow-up performed by general practitioners. No significant differences in time to detection of recurrence and quality of life emerged. Patient satisfaction was greater among patients treated by general practitioners. One RCT (196 women) compared regularly scheduled follow-up visits to less frequent visits restricted to the time of mammography. No significant differences emerged in interim use of telephone and frequency of GP's consultations.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review of RCTs conducted almost 20 years ago suggest that follow-up programs based on regular physical examinations and yearly mammography alone are as effective as more intensive approaches based on regular performance of laboratory and instrumental tests in terms of timeliness of recurrence detection, overall survival and quality of life. In one RCT, follow-up care performed by trained general practitioners working in an organized practice setting had comparable effectiveness to that delivered by hospital-based specialists in terms of quality of life and time to detection of distant metastases.

Double-reading of plain radiographs – no benefit with regard to earliness of diagnosis of cancer recurrence: a randomised follow-up study

The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of the radiologist's interpretation of plain radiographs on the earliness of diagnosis of cancer recurrences. Data consisted of patients who had undergone primary treatment and were resident in the Tampere University Hospital Area in Finland during 1991-1997. Consecutive patients were randomised in a double-reading arm (an oncologist and a radiologist independently interpreting radiographs), and in a single-reading arm (interpretation by an oncologist only; if necessary, a radiologist's clinical report was obtained following a separate request). The time of diagnosis of recurrence and death were estimated by the cumulative probabilities of actuarial method with the Wilcoxon (Gehan) test. There were 869 eligible participants, mostly breast cancer patients (n = 516). In total, 227 recurrences were diagnosed, and of these 55 on plain radiographs, which is 24.2% of the total number of recurrences. There was no statistically significant difference between the arms in the number of recurrences (P = 0.85) or in the time of detecting the recurrence (P = 0.64). Altogether, 225 (25.9%) died from cancer and 38 (4.4%) from other causes. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.34) in survival between the two arms during the follow-up to 5 years. Double-reading of plain radiographs does not offer any extra benefit for the detection of recurrences or for patient's survival compared with single-reading.

Evaluation of an intensive strategy for follow-up and surveillance of primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Controversies over the frequency and intensity of the follow-up care of breast cancer patients exist. Some physicians have adopted an intensive approach to follow-up care that consists of frequent laboratory tests and routine imaging studies, including chest radiographs, bone scans, and CT scans, whereas others have established a minimalist approach consisting of only history, physical examinations, and mammograms.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate the role of intensive follow-up on detection of breast cancer recurrence and to examine the impact of follow-up on overall survival.

METHODS

During a 10-year period (1986-1996), 129 patients with recurrent disease were identified from a prospective database of 1898 breast cancer patients. The patients with recurrent disease were divided into minimalist or intensive groups according to method of detection.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 126 (21%) patients were assigned to the intensive method of detection group (LFT, CEA, CA 15-3, chest radiograph, CT scan, and bone scan); 99 of 126 (79%) patients were assigned to the minimal detection group (history, physical examination, and mammography). Distant disease to the bone was the most common initial tumor recurrence, at 27%. History, physical examination, and mammography detected recurrent cancer in approximately the same amount of time as LFTs, tumor markers, CT scans, and chest radiographs (P = .960). When the recurrent patients were divided into intensive and minimalist groups and analyzed by time to detection of recurrence, there was no significant difference between the time to detection in those recurrences detected by intensive methods and those recurrences detected by minimalist methods (P = .95). The independent variables age, tumor size, type of surgery, number of positive nodes, time to recurrence, method of detection, and site of recurrence (regional or distant) were subject to univariate and multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model. Only two variables had an impact on survival by multivariate analysis: early timing of the recurrence (P = .0011) and the site of the recurrence (P = .02). Timing was defined as early (< or =365 days from the time of diagnosis to recurrence) or late (> or =365 days from the time of diagnosis to recurrence). Early recurrence was the first variable found to be significant on stepwise forward regression analysis. The primary site of recurrence was significant at step two. The method of detection--intensive or minimal--did not significantly affect survival (P = .18).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no survival benefit to routine intensive follow-up regimens in detecting recurrent breast cancer. Expensive diagnostic tests such as bone scans, CT scans, and serial tumor markers are best used for detection of metastasis in symptomatic patients.

Clinical surveillance for early stage breast cancer: an analysis of claims data

This study estimates the costs of clinical follow-up for women with early stage breast cancer and evaluates the effects of patient and provider characteristics on follow-up intensity. Claims data were cumulated from 1/1/89 through 4/30/93 for a comprehensive set of follow-up tests (office visits, radiologic, and laboratory) ordered for 222 women diagnosed at a university hospital between 1/1/89 and 12/31/91. Aggregated measures of the volume and costs of follow-up over 6 month intervals were expressed in terms of Medicare's 1993 relative value units (RVUs) and their 1993 cost equivalents. Excluding the first 6 months, women received on average, 11.7 RVUs of follow-up in the first year (equivalent to a cost of $362), and 9.5 RVUs in the second year ($297). In the first year, chest x-rays, clinical chemistry tests, automated hemograms, and bone scans, accounted for 36% of the cost of follow-up, while computerized tomographic scans and magnetic resonance imaging studies accounted for 30%. Multiple regression analysis of the first year data showed that women who received radiation and/or were followed by oncology, were more likely to receive intensive follow-up. Age, race, socioeconomic status, insurance, stage, and treatment did not impact follow-up. Costs of follow-up for breast cancer are substantial, though much lower than suggested by others. Additionally, wide variations in practice are largely unexplained by patient and/or provider characteristics. In light of recent evidence questioning the benefit of intensive surveillance, this study supports the need for an accepted set of follow-up guidelines for breast cancer.

An analysis of the cost of clinical surveillance after primary therapy for women with early stage invasive breast cancer

Routine surveillance for distant metastases in women with early stage breast cancer has limited clinical utility and can result in large medical care costs. In order to estimate breast cancer surveillance costs, we used the results of a survey administered to a random sample of physician members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The survey measured the frequency in which radiographic and laboratory tests are ordered for postmenopausal women with stage I or II breast cancer after the completion of surgery and radiation or adjuvant chemotherapy if indicated. There were 209 completed surveys representing a response rate of 48%. The volume of tests ordered was expressed in terms of Medicare's relative value units (RVUs) and 1993 cost equivalents. The mean total RVUs over 5 years post-diagnosis was 43.8 (interquartile range 30.1-54.2) which represents a cost of $1369 using the 1993 Medicare conversion factor of $31.249. A cumulative logistic regression model categorized RVUs according to intensity of care (minimal, average, and intensive). While medical oncologists compared to surgeons and radiation oncologists, and physicians practicing in the Northeast and Midwest, compared to those practicing in the South and West, were more likely to adopt an intensive practice style, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.1). None of the other provider characteristics evaluated, including gender, prior experience, and practice type, had a significant effect on physician practice in a multivariate model. The data showed a wide variation among providers in surveillance practice patterns that was largely unexplained by physician demographics. These results are consistent with the physician practice style hypothesis which suggests that wide variations in treatment patterns result from uncertainty regarding effectiveness of care.

An evaluation of clinical follow-up in women with early stage breast cancer among physician members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Routine clinical follow-up for distant metastatic disease among women with early stage breast cancer is of uncertain clinical benefit. In order to evaluate current practice patterns, we administered a mailed survey to a stratified random sample of physician members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (N = 435). The survey assessed the frequency and motivation for ordering follow-up medical tests in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with stage I or II breast cancer. The response rate was 55%, distributed as 39% radiation oncologists, 32% medical oncologists, and 29% surgeons. In the first year after treatment, physicians performed, on average, one physical examination every 3 months, one blood panel (CBC, alkaline phosphatase and liver function tests) every 4 months, and one chest radiograph every 9 months. In addition, 38% of the respondents ordered CEA and 21% ordered CA 15-3 levels, 28% ordered bone scans, and less than 4% ordered CT scans, bone surveys, or bone marrow biopsies in the first year after treatment. A logistic regression analysis controlling for physician age, gender, sub-specialty, practice type, years of experience, number of breast cancer patients treated annually, geographic region, and community size, showed that surgeons were less likely to order blood tests (p < 0.001) and tumor markers (p < 0.0029) than medical oncologists in years 3 and 5 of follow-up. Compared to physicians practicing in the northeast, those from the midwest were less likely to order chest radiographs in year 3 of follow-up (p = 0.0028). Other provider characteristics had no significant effect on test ordering behavior. The results of this survey suggest that relatively uniform practice patterns in regard to the follow-up of postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer exist among ASCO physicians.

Follow-up of breast cancer patients stage I-II: a baseline strategy

In 430 stage I-II breast cancer patients the cost-benefit of investigations during follow-up have been studied. Median follow-up time was 8 years and 128 patients had relapsed, 91 with metastatic disease. High costs of routine chest X-ray, limited skeletal X-ray and bone scan examinations were associated with low incidence of diagnosed relapses not suspected otherwise. In the eight blood analyses examined, increases of more than 10 mm/h in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 20 U/l in gamma-glutamyltransferase (GT) or 60 U/l in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) resulted in a combined sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 91% for relapses with distant metastases. Elevation of at least two blood tests gave a combined sensitivity of 31% and a specificity of 98%. The importance of using individual reference values in screening for recurrences is emphasised. Symptomatic relapse or relapse detected at interval visits were not independent prognostic factors. The blood tests ALP, ESR and GT were strong predictors of survival measured from relapse which increase their legitimacy in follow-up. A more frequent follow-up for patients with 4+ involved nodes is proposed: three visits annually the first 5 years vs. two visits annually for the others. We conclude that history, clinical examination, ALP, ESR and GT are sufficient as a baseline screening for relapse in breast cancer patients.

Influence of early diagnosis on prognosis of recurrent breast cancer

Between 1980 and 1986 676 patients with primary breast cancer were operated on with curative intention at the Department of Surgery, Hanusch Medical Center, Vienna, Austria. Of these, 133 had recurrences. The patients were closely followed at the Outpatient Clinic. The authors have retrospectively analyzed this patient collective to evaluate the impact of routine technical and laboratory-chemical follow-up programs on the detection rate of subclinical distant metastases and improvement of prognosis. There was no difference in outcome in terms of survival after recurrence and overall survival between patients with detection or recurrence in the asymptomatic stage who received general antitumoral therapy immediately, and a second group whose therapy was initiated upon clinical manifestation. The authors discuss the results in view of the screening costs. They emphasize the potential of follow-up programs due to timely detection of local recurrence, and observation of the contralateral breast, as well as the psychological aspect of a stable doctor-patient relationship.

Follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer

This study evaluates the usefulness of routine follow-up of breast cancer patients. In all, 416 patients who were treated with curative intent for breast cancer were followed according to a fixed follow-up schedule for a minimum of 2.5 years and a maximum of 13.5 years (mean about 5 years). During the 4533 routine out-patient visits, 4116 chest radiographs, 3889 pelvic radiographs and about 17,000 laboratory tests were carried out routinely. In the follow-up period, 148 patients were found to have distant recurrence of whom 34 (23 per cent) had asymptomatic metastases and 114 symptomatic metastases. Of the 8005 routinely performed radiographs, 24 (0.3 per cent) revealed asymptomatic metastases, and the 17,000 laboratory tests led to the discovery of six asymptomatic bone and four asymptomatic liver recurrences. Screening for metastases did not result in a reduction of the lead time to the diagnosis of asymptomatic metastases; the disease-free interval was equal in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Of the 46 locoregional recurrences 42 were found by physical examination during a routine follow-up visit and 37 had not been noticed by the patient. Seventeen second primary breast cancers were diagnosed, six of which were in stage I (less than 2 cm). Mammography was not a part of the routine follow-up scheme. It is concluded that routine follow-up of breast cancer patients by history and physical examination is sufficient to detect local recurrence and a second primary tumour as well as giving the opportunity to track signs and symptoms of distant recurrence at an early stage. Performing annual or biannual mammography is advisable, but the use of other costly routine investigations in the follow-up is not justifiable, as no therapeutic advantages can be expected.