Combined modality therapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

WITHDRAWN. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (without surgery) compared with radiotherapy alone in localized carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Esophageal carcinoma can be managed primarily with either a surgical or non-surgical radiotherapeutic approach. Combination chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) has been incorporated into clinical practice and applied increasingly, especially in North America.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate combined CT and RT (CTRT) versus RT alone in patients with localized esophageal carcinoma. Outcomes included overall survival, cause-specific survival, local recurrence, dysphagia relief, quality of life, acute and chronic toxicities.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane strategy for identifying randomized trials was combined with relevant MeSH headings. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CancerLIT and EMBASE were last searched in April 2005. References from relevant articles and personal files were included.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in patients with localized esophageal cancer comparing RT alone with combined CTRT were included. Studies comparing non-chemotherapy agents such as pure radiotherapy sensitisers, immunostimulants, planned esophagectomy, were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently. Trial quality was assessed using the Jadad scale and Detsky checklist. Sensitivity analyses were planned to examine the effect of concomitant versus sequential treatment, study quality, radiotherapy dose, and whether the drug regimen contained cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen randomized trials were included, with eleven concomitant and eight sequential RTCT studies. Concomitant RTCT provided significant reduction in mortality with a harms ratio (HR) of 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 0.84). Using an estimated mortality rate for the control group of 62% at year one and 83% at year two, the absolute survival benefit for RTCT was 9% (95% CI 5 to 12%) and 4% (95% CI 3 to 6%]) respectively. There was an absolute reduction of local recurrence rate of 12% (95% CI 3 to 22%), number needed to treat (NNT) of 9, when the local recurrence rate for the RT alone arm was 68%. This was associated with a significant risk of severe and life-threatening toxicities (number needed to harm (NNH)of 6). Sensitivity analyses did not identify any factors that interacted with the results. The results from sequential RTCT studies showed no significant benefit in survival or local control but significant toxicities.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available data, when a non-operative approach is selected then concomitant RTCT is superior to RT alone for patients with localized esophageal cancer but with significant toxicities. In patients who are in good general condition, and the risk benefit has been thoroughly discussed with the patient, concomitant RTCT should be considered for the management of esophageal cancer compared with radiotherapy alone.

Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (without surgery) compared with radiotherapy alone in localized carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Esophageal carcinoma can be managed primarily with either a surgical or non-surgical radiotherapeutic approach. Combination chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) has been incorporated into clinical practice and applied increasingly, especially in North America.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate combined CT and RT (CTRT) versus RT alone in patients with localized esophageal carcinoma. Outcomes included overall survival, cause-specific survival, local recurrence, dysphagia relief, quality of life, acute and chronic toxicities.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane strategy for identifying randomized trials was combined with relevant MeSH headings. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CancerLIT and EMBASE were last searched in April 2005. References from relevant articles and personal files were included.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in patients with localized esophageal cancer comparing RT alone with combined CTRT were included. Studies comparing non-chemotherapy agents such as pure radiotherapy sensitisers, immunostimulants, planned esophagectomy, were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently. Trial quality was assessed using the Jadad scale and Detsky checklist. Sensitivity analyses were planned to examine the effect of concomitant versus sequential treatment, study quality, radiotherapy dose, and whether the drug regimen contained cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen randomized trials were included, with eleven concomitant and eight sequential RTCT studies. Concomitant RTCT provided significant reduction in mortality with a harms ratio (HR) of 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 0.84). Using an estimated mortality rate for the control group of 62% at year one and 83% at year two, the absolute survival benefit for RTCT was 9% (95% CI 5 to 12%) and 4% (95% CI 3 to 6%]) respectively. There was an absolute reduction of local recurrence rate of 12% (95% CI 3 to 22%), number needed to treat (NNT) of 9, when the local recurrence rate for the RT alone arm was 68%. This was associated with a significant risk of severe and life-threatening toxicities (number needed to harm (NNH)of 6). Sensitivity analyses did not identify any factors that interacted with the results. The results from sequential RTCT studies showed no significant benefit in survival or local control but significant toxicities.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available data, when a non-operative approach is selected then concomitant RTCT is superior to RT alone for patients with localized esophageal cancer but with significant toxicities. In patients who are in good general condition, and the risk benefit has been thoroughly discussed with the patient, concomitant RTCT should be considered for the management of esophageal cancer compared with radiotherapy alone.

Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (without surgery) compared with radiotherapy alone in localized carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Esophageal carcinoma can be managed primarily with either a surgical or radiotherapeutic (non surgical) approach. Strategies to improve the outcome of either modality alone include the use of combined modalities. Combination chemotherapy radiotherapy is one approach that has been explored over the years with increasing application in clinical practice especially in North America.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the outcome of patients with localized esophageal carcinoma. Outcomes of interest include overall survival, cause specific survival, local recurrence, dysphagia relief, quality of life, acute and chronic toxicities.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane strategy for identifying randomized trials was combined with MeSH headings including esophageal neoplasms, radiotherapy, chemotherapy combined modality, drug therapy combination. MEDLINE, CancerLIT and EMBASE were searched using this strategy. In addition, the Cochrane library was also searched. References from relevant articles and personal files were included.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in patients with localized esophageal cancer, with one arm employing radiotherapy alone, and one arm employing combination radiotherapy chemotherapy were included. Studies comparing non chemotherapy agents such as pure radiotherapy sensitisers, immunostimulants, planned esophagectomy, were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, and the trial quality was assessed using both the Jadad scoring and Detsky checklist. Sensitivity analysis was planned to explore sources of heterogeneity where heterogeneity existed. The factors hypothesized a priori included combination versus sequential treatment, quality of study, biological effective radiotherapy dose (i.e. Radiotherapy dose) cisplatin versus non cisplatin containing trials, and 5FU versus non 5FU containing trials. Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence limits were used to assess the significance of the difference between the treatment arms. Absolute risk difference and number needed to treat (NNT) were used to express the magnitude of difference where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen randomized trials were included in the analysis. There were eight concomitant and five sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RTCT) studies. The studies were analyzed separately due to observed heterogeneity across all the studies and biological considerations. Concomitant RTCT provided significant overall reduction in mortality at 1 and 2 years. The mortality in the control arms was 62% and 83% respectively. Combined RTCT provided an absolute reduction of mortality by 7% (95% CI 1-15%) and 7% (95% CI 0-15%) respectively. Expressed as NNT, this is 12 and 12 respectively. At longer follow up, the results were heterogeneous, cautioning against pooling of the data. There was a reduction in the overall local recurrence rate. The local recurrence rate for the control arms was in the order of 68%. Combined RTCT provided an absolute reduction of local recurrence rate of 12% (95% CI 3-22%) with a NNT of 9. There was significant increase of severe and life threatening toxicities with a NNH of 6, with this approach. The sensitivity analysis did not identify any factor that interacted with the results, or subgroup in which the benefit appear to be limited to. The results from the sequential RTCT studies were heterogeneous and could not be pooled. Factors hypothesized a priori did not identify any single source that could account for a significant component of the heterogeneity. Examining the results individually, there was no data to support clinical benefit. This approach was also accompanied by significant toxicities.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

When a non-operative approach is selected, then concomitant RTCT is superior to the RT alone. This approach is accompanied by significant toxicities. In patients who are in good general condition, and the risk benefit has been thoroughly discussed with the patient, co thoroughly discussed with the patient, concomitant RTCT should be considered for the management of esophageal cancer compared with radiotherapy alone.

External beam radiotherapy and intraluminal brachytherapy in advanced inoperable esophageal cancer: JIPMER experience

From January 1994 to September 1998, all inoperable cases of cancer of the esophagus at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India were given external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) 36 Gy/18 times by anteroposterior pair. After EBRT, those patients who could be intubated with 16 F Levine's tube either directly or after endoscopic dilatation were given intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) 36 Gy in 48 hours at 1 cm. Others were treated by EBRT by posterior oblique fields 24 Gy/12 times. Fifty-eight patients who received EBRT and ILBT formed the study group. Fifty percent had middle one third growth and except for three, all were squamous cell carcinoma (95%). Fifty-nine percent required postradiation endoscopic dilatation. The overall survival rate was 24% at the end of 1 year. In one patient, tracheoesophageal fistula developed 4 months after treatment. Mild-to-moderate acute esophagitis developed in 10% of the patients, and 2% had slight hemoptysis, but these were not significant enough to interrupt treatment. There was no treatment-related mortality. Thirty-four patients (59%) were followed up for 6 months to 5 years (mean, 9.6 months). Three patients had follow-up of more than 3 years with no evidence of disease. EBRT with ILBT, with intermittent esophageal dilatations as required, offers very good palliation in advanced inoperable cancer of the esophagus.

A single session of intraluminal brachytherapy in palliation of oesophageal cancer

Between September 1987 and September 1993, 88 patients with oesophageal cancer were treated by a single session of intraluminal brachytherapy of 15 Gy prescribed at 1 cm distance from the central axis, using MDR137Cs (n = 51) during the first part of the study and HDR192Ir (n = 37) during the second part of the study. All patients were regarded as inoperable. Improvement of dysphagia, assessed 4-6 weeks after treatment, was noted in 50 of 75 (67%) evaluable patients, whereas swallowing ability was completely restored in 47% of them. Relapse of dysphagia occurred in 28 (37%) patients during follow-up. Additional palliative treatment consisted of endoprosthesis in 14 (19%), a second course of brachytherapy in 13 (17%), one or more dilatations only in 11 (15%) and laser treatment in four (5%) patients. One non-fatal haemorrhage and five fistulae occurred, all in the presence of tumour. Two severe ulcerations without evidence of tumour were noted, both managed by combined curative treatment. The median survival of the group investigated was 5.5 months. An exophytic, non-circular growth pattern was associated with a better response. In a multivariate analysis the presence of distant metastases (p = 0.0028), weight loss (p = 0.0051) and an exophytic growth pattern (p = 0.0199) were associated with a worse survival. The present data indicate that a single session of ILB is appropriate in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with inoperable oesophagal cancer showing bad prognostic signs. Up to now there has been no clear evidence for benefit of addition of ERT.

Results of irradiation treatment in patients with non-resectable oesophageal cancer

Forty-eight patients with non-resectable cancer of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction (Group A: Stage I/II, 32; Group B: Stage III/IV, 16) underwent intraluminal Iridium-192 high dose-rate afterloading therapy (5-7 Gy/session, total dose: 5-21 Gy, mean: 12.4 Gy) and external beam irradiation (Karnofsky > or = 80% 50-60 Gy/2 Gy per day; Karnofsky 60-79%: 30 Gy/3 Gy per day). Durable satisfactory palliation (intake of at least semi-solid food) was demonstrated in 96% of patients. The mean survival for group A was 19.1 months and that for group B, 6.9 months, with a 12-month survival rate of 66% (group A) and 0% (group B) (P < 0.001). Local tumour response and complication rate were significantly dose-related with a predicted response rate of 70.5%, and a complication rate of 50% at ERD 129.3 Gy.

Neoadjuvant therapy for squamous cell esophageal carcinoma

A number of studies have demonstrated that preoperative chemotherapy (CTx) and combination radiochemotherapy (RTx/CTx) in patients with potentially resectable and locally advanced squamous cell esophageal carcinoma is feasible. In patients with potentially resectable tumors, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection has, however, so far not shown an increase in the resection rate, rate of complete macroscopic and microscopic tumor resections, i.e. R0-resections according to the UICC, or survival time as compared to patients who had surgical resection alone. In this situation a survival benefit, if at all, can be expected only in those who respond to preoperative therapy. At the present time preoperative CTx or RTx/CTx in patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma must therefore be considered investigational and should not be performed outside the context of clinical trials. In patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma, neoadjuvant therapy markedly increases the rate of R0-resections and appears to prolong survival. Combined modality therapy in this context is, however, associated with a substantial perioperative mortality and morbidity. Open questions that have to be addressed by randomized studies include the role, extent and timing of surgical resection in the combined modality approach to patients with locally advanced squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. Research has to focus on preoperative staging modalities and the development of more effective and less toxic preoperative therapy regimen to improve identification of patients that might benefit from combined modality therapy and to more effectively combat systemic recurrences.

Iridium-192 high dose rate brachytherapy combined with external beam irradiation in non-resectable oesophageal cancer

Forty-eight patients with non-resectable cancer of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction (group A: Stage I/II: n = 32; group B: Stage III/IV: n = 16) underwent intralumenal iridium-192 high dose-rate afterloading brachytherapy (5-7 Gy/session, total dose 5-21 Gy, mean 12.4 Gy) and external beam irradiation (Karnofsky > or = 80%: 50-60 Gy/2 Gy per day; Karnofsky 60%-79%: 30 Gy/3 per day). Prolonged satisfactory palliation (intake of at least semi-solid food) was demonstrated in 96% of patients. The mean survival for group A was 19.1 months and that for group B 6.9 months, with a 12-month survival rate of 66% for group A and 0% for group B (P < 0.001). Local tumour response and complication rate were significantly dose related with a predicted response rate of 70.5% and a complication rate of 50% at extrapolated response dose (ERD) 129.3 GY3 (Gy at alpha/beta = 3).

Palliation in esophageal cancer with a single session of intraluminal irradiation

From September 1987 to December 1989, 36 patients with advanced esophageal cancer entered a study in order to determine the efficacy of palliation by a single session of intraluminal irradiation. A dose of 15 Gy was administered at 1 cm distance from the central axis of the applicator. In 22 of 32 patients alive at least 6 weeks after treatment dysphagia improved, in 14 this relief was complete. Re-obstruction occurred in 8 of the 22 responders, but a second treatment with intraluminal irradiation gave improvement in six. Intraesophageal prostheses were needed in only 6 of the 36 patients. Intraluminal irradiation is easy to administer and safe, it forms a useful addition to the therapeutic possibilities for the palliation of esophageal cancer.

Survival and esophageal passage after radiotherapy of inoperable esophageal carcinoma. A retrospective study of 106 cases

Survival and esophageal passage were studied retrospectively in 106 patients with inoperable esophageal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy during the years 1972 to 1983. The survival rates were 30%, 13% and 7% at one, two and three years respectively. The survival rate for the female patients was significantly better than for the males throughout these three years; 9% of the female patients lived for three years compared to only 3% of the male patients. Forty-two percent of the patients received 'radical' irradiation (greater than 50 Gy). The 3-year survival rate was 16% after a tumor dose of 50 Gy or more, and zero with a dose less than 50 Gy, but this difference might be explained by selection factors, such as patients in poor general condition not receiving 'radical' irradiation. Esophageal passage after radiotherapy could be evaluated in 62 patients, and 22 (35%) of them required feeding gastrostomy due to esophageal discontinuity, most often within one year after completion of radiotherapy. It is concluded that radiotherapy has only a slight effect on the prognosis of inoperable esophageal carcinoma.