Adjuvant therapy of premenopausal and menopausal high-risk breast cancer patients. Present status of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Trials 77-B and 82-B

Improvement of prognosis in breast cancer in Denmark 1977-2006, based on the nationwide reporting to the DBCG Registry

INTRODUCTION

Since 30 years DBCG (Danish Breast Cancer Coperative Group) has maintained, on a nation-wide basis, a clinical database of diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions, and clinical outcome in patients with primary breast cancer. The present analysis was undertaken to evaluate the development of the prognosis since 1977, and to analyse factors potentially contributing to the change of the prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All cases of invasive breast cancer reported to DBCG during the period 1977-2006 were included in the present analysis.

RESULTS

A total of close to 80 000 patients were registered in the DBCG Database. Since 1977 the prognosis has improved significantly, thus 5 year survival for the total population of patients with primary breast cancer has increased from 65 to 81%.

DISCUSSION

According to the present analysis diagnosis at an earlier stage in the natural course of the disease and especially the development of more active systemic treatment modalities have contributed to the improved prognosis.

Postoperative radiotherapy in DBCG during 30 years. Techniques, indications and clinical radiobiological experience

During the time period 1977-2007 postoperative radiotherapy in DBCG has varied considerably with regard to techniques and indications together with changes in the extent of surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy. The radiation treatment has been developed on the basis of clinical, radiophysical and radiobiological principles, encompassing also practical problems such as available equipment in the different centres and at times lack of sufficient machine capacity. The paper focus especially on the comprehensive work done prior to the DBCG 82 b&c studies, in order to optimize radiotherapy in all aspects prior to the evaluation of the efficacy of this treatment modality. The results from these trials did succeed in clear evidence that radiotherapy has an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of early breast cancer. In parallel to these studies a new and challenging use of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery was evaluated in the DBCG TM 82 protocol. The experience obtained with different techniques in this study formed the basis for the current principles of radiotherapy after lumpectomy. Reduction of radiation related morbidity has been a major issue for the DBCG radiotherapy group, and in this aspect several studies, including quality control visits, have been carried out to make the relevant modifications and to evaluate deviations from the guidelines between the centres. The background for the changes in radiotherapy is described for each of the programme periods as well as future perspectives which will include further refinements of the target and adjustments of dose and fractionation in selected patients.

The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise

Introduction. Since 30 years, DBCG (Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group) has maintained a clinical database allowing the conduct of quality control studies, of randomised trials, examination of the epidemiology of breast cancer and of prognostic and predictive factors. Material and methods. The original database included patients with invasive breast cancer, but has later been expanded to patients with in situ breast cancer and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Results. The multidisciplinary cooperative group has provided successive treatment guidelines and 70% of the 77284 registered patients have been enrolled and received treatment according to these guidelines. The standard treatments and the randomised trials included in the DBCG programmes are all briefly described. Among high-risk patients 48% have participated in randomised trials, and the results of these trials have largely been implemented in the next generation of treatment guidelines. Records within the clinical database of archival tumour tissue have established a basis for translational research and epidemiologic research has been enabled through linkage to other healthcare registries. Discussion. The joint conception of the multidisciplinary breast cancer group and a clinical database has provided improvements in the management of breast cancer patients and has enabled recruitment of patients onto randomised trials.

The prognostic influence of multifocality in breast cancer patients

The aim of this study was to investigate whether multifocality (MF) is a factor that has significant effect on overall survival when controlling for known prognostic factors. A cohort of 929 breast cancer patients operated between 1985 and 1990 was investigated. Of these, 158 (17%) patients had MF tumors and 771 had unifocal tumors. To investigate whether MF is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in breast cancer, a Cox regression model was applied. Only tumor size, positive lymph nodes, histologic grade and receptor status had a significant effect on overall survival in the multivariate analysis. We found a positive correlation between tumor size and MF and between the number of positive lymph nodes and MF. In conclusion, MF had no significant effect on overall survival besides that which can be explained by other prognostic factors.

Effects of psychotherapy on cancer survival

The possibility that psychotherapy could extend survival time for cancer patients has attracted attention among clinical investigators interested in the mind-body connection, among cancer patients seeking the best possible outcome and among the general public. A small number of randomized trials have been conducted, and they have produced conflicting results. Does emotional support affect the course of cancer? What physiological pathways might mediate such an effect? Given what we now know, should we change the standard of care for cancer patients?

Axillary surgery in breast cancer management--background, incidence and extent of nodal spread, extent of surgery and accurate axillary staging, surgical procedures

The prime objectives of axillary surgery in the management of breast cancer are 1) accurate staging, 2) treatment to cure and 3) quantitative information of metastatic lymph nodes for prognostic purposes and allocation to adjuvant protocols. It is generally agreed that axillary node status in potentially curable breast cancer is considered the single best predictor of outcome and the main determinant of allocation to adjuvant therapy. No physical examination, no imaging techniques, and no molecular biologic markers can today replace axillary surgery for staging purposes. The objectives of axillary surgery are best obtained by carrying out a complete axillary clearance. Nonetheless, less radical surgery is generally performed by carrying out a sampling procedure with a yield of about 4 nodes or a partial axillary dissection level I-II with at least 10 nodes recovered. Understaging the axilla is detrimental to outcome and, furthermore, locoregional tumor control is important for survival. Axillary surgery should therefore be conducted in accordance with high professional standards.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer significantly improves overall survival: the missing link

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The influence of surgical adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival of patients with operable breast cancer is still a controversial subject. The negative result of the EBCTCG meta-analysis (Early breast cancer trialists', collaborative group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomised trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;333:1444-1455) of clinical randomized trials on adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer is in strong contrast with the Danish 82B, 82C and British Columbia trials (Overgaard M, Hanse PS, Overgaar J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;337:949-955; Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomized trial. Lancet 1999;353:1641-1648; Ragaz J, Jackson S, Le N, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;337:956-962) showing an impressive survival benefit. This paper tries to fill in the gap between the conflicting results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 36 trials of the EBCTCG (Early breast cancer trialists', collaborative group, 1995) were prospectively screened for a number of objective parameters that are usually not analyzed in review papers. The odds of death data (and its variance) were borrowed from the original meta-analysis (Early breast cancer trialists', collaborative group, 1995) to check whether the objective features were significant predictors for overall survival benefit.

RESULTS

A significant survival benefit for the radiotherapy arm was found for recent trials (2P<0.05), large trials (2P<0.03), trials that used standard fractionation (2P<0.02), and trials with a favourable crude survival (2P<0.03). For these four parameters clear parameter-effect relations were found. In recent and large trials the odds reduction was 12.4% (2P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival of breast cancer patients provided that current techniques are used and treatment is given with standard fractionation. For the best subgroups we observed an odds of death reduction of more than 20%. The results of this study stress the importance of reducing cardiovascular and other late toxicity in adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Myocardial perfusion imaging in breast cancer patients treated with or without post-mastectomy radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the occurrence and location of myocardial perfusion defects in left-sided mastectomized breast cancer patients, treated with or without postoperative radiotherapy according to the guidelines from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen left-sided breast cancer patients, with a median age of 59 years (range, 47-75 years), randomized to post-mastectomy irradiation plus systemic treatment, or systemic treatment alone, were examined after a median follow-up of 7.9 years (range, 6.0-12.2 years). The chest wall and the ipsilateral internal mammary nodes had been treated through two anterior-shaped electron fields, and the electron energy was chosen according to chest wall thickness, measured individually by ultrasound. The median absorbed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions, with 5 fractions/week. Information on clinical history was obtained and symptoms of ischemic heart disease (IHD), as well as major risk factors, were recorded. All patients had a physical examination, blood chemistry, electrocardiogram (ECG), chest X-ray and myocardial perfusion imaging by sestamibi-single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT). SPECT-scanning was performed as a rest/dipyridamole 2-day protocol. The evaluation of regional myocardial perfusion was based on scintigrams using a 20-segment model.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the scintigraphic findings in the two groups. Four of ten irradiated patients and four of seven non-irradiated patients showed scintigraphic defects. An anterior defect was found in one non-irradiated patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not indicate that the described radiotherapy technique induces detectable coronary artery disease. However, the small number of patients does not allow strong conclusions to be drawn.

[Postmastectomy locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer: literature review]

Postoperative radiotherapy is controversial after radical mastectomy. Recent clinical trials have shown an increase in survival with this irradiation and conclusions of previous meta-analyses should be reconsidered. The results of a large number of randomized clinical trials in which women received post-mastectomy radiotherapy or not have been reviewed. These trials showed a decrease in locoregional failure with the use of postoperative radiotherapy but survival advantages have not been clearly identified. A larger number of randomized clinical trials compared postoperative radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone and the association of the two treatments. They showed that chemotherapy was less active locally than radiotherapy and that radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly increased both disease-free and overall survival rates in the groups which received postoperative radiotherapy. These favourable results were, however, obtained with optimal radiotherapy techniques and a relative sparing of lung tissue and cardiac muscle. Many retrospective clinical analyses concluded that results obtained in locoregional failure rate were poor and that these failures led to an increase in future risks. Both radiotherapy and systemic treatment should be delivered after mastectomy, reserved for patients with a high risk of locoregional relapses, particularly of nodes and/or tumors with a diameter > or = 5 cm. However, radiotherapy could produce secondary effects, and techniques of radiotherapy should be optimal.

Tamoxifen in high-risk premenopausal women with primary breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Report from the Danish Breast Cancer co-operative Group DBCG 82B Trial

Following modified radical mastectomy, pre- and perimenopausal (amenorrhoea for < 5 years) patients with stage II or III breast cancer received CMF (cyclophosphamide 600, methotrexate 40, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 4 weeks, 9 cycles). The effect on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) to adjuvant chemotherapy was examined by randomisation either to no additional treatment (n = 314), or concurrently TAM 30 mg daily for 1 year (n = 320). 40% had positive, 12% negative and 48% unknown receptor status. One year after surgery 21% versus 35% (CMF + TAM versus CMF) were still menstruating (P < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 12.2 years there was no difference in RFS (10-year RFS 34% versus 35%, P = 0.81) or OS (45% versus 46%, P = 0.73). In a Cox proportional hazards model, tumour size, number of metastatic lymph nodes, frequency of metastatic nodes in relation to total number of nodes removed, degree of anaplasia, age, and menostasia within the first year after operation were significant independent prognostic factors for RFS, and the same factors except age for OS. No significant interactions with TAM were seen. Thus, in this group of pre- and perimenopausal high-risk early breast cancer patients with heterogeneous receptor status given CMF i.v., concurrent TAM for 1 year did not improve the outcome. These results do not exclude that receptor positive patients may benefit from adjuvant TAM for longer periods given sequentially to chemotherapy.

Morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease in high-risk breast-cancer patients after adjuvant postmastectomy systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy: analysis of DBCG 82b and 82c randomised trials. Radiotherapy Committee of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy in addition to systemic treatment after mastectomy prolongs survival in high-risk breast-cancer patients. However, adjuvant radiotherapy has a potential association with ischaemic heart disease. We assessed morbidity and mortality from ischaemic heart disease in patients treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1982 and 1990, we randomly assigned 3083 women at high risk of breast cancer, after mastectomy, adjuvant systemic treatment with (n=1538) or without (n=1545) radiotherapy. An anterior photon field was used against the periclavicular region and the axilla. The chest wall was treated through two anterior shaped electron fields, one including the internal mammary nodes. The intended dose was 48-50 Gy in 22-25 fractions, at four to five fractions per week. We obtained information on morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease over a median of 10 years. Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

More women in the no-radiotherapy group than in the radiotherapy group died of breast cancer (799 [52.5%] vs 674 [44.2%]), whereas similar proportions of each group died from ischaemic heart disease (13 [0.9%] vs 12 [0.8%]). The relative hazard of morbidity from ischaemic heart disease among patients in the radiotherapy compared with the no-radiotherapy group was 0.86 (95% CI 0.6-1.3), and that for death from ischaemic heart disease was 0.84 (0.4-1.8). The hazard rate of morbidity from ischaemic heart disease in the radiotherapy group compared with the no-radiotherapy group did not increase with time from treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Postmastectomy radiotherapy with this regimen does not increase the actuarial risk of ischaemic heart disease after 12 years.

Current status of tamoxifen use: An update for the surgical oncologist

The surgical oncologist is frequently responsible for the screening and diagnosis of women with breast cancer. In this pivotal role, they are often the first to discuss treatment options, including nonsurgical interventions, with breast cancer patients. Recent long-term clinical trial data provide support for the use of tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer in women at high risk of the disease. A breast cancer risk assessment can help identify women at higher than average risk for the disease, who may be appropriate candidates for chemoprevention. It is important for the surgical oncologist to understand the current indications and evidence regarding the use of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention and treatment as they counsel their patients on available options.

Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy radiotherapy is associated with a lower locoregional recurrence rate and improved disease-free and overall survival when combined with chemotherapy in premenopausal high-risk breast-cancer patients. However, whether the same benefits apply also in postmenopausal women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for similar high-risk cancer is unclear. In a randomised trial among postmenopausal women who had undergone mastectomy, we compared adjuvant tamoxifen alone with tamoxifen plus postoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1982 and 1990, postmenopausal women with high-risk breast cancer (stage II or III) were randomly assigned adjuvant tamoxifen (30 mg daily for 1 year) alone (689) or with postoperative radiotherapy to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes (686). Median follow-up was 123 months. The endpoints were first site of recurrence (locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, or both), and disease-free and overall survival.

FINDINGS

Locoregional recurrence occurred in 52 (8%) of the radiotherapy plus tamoxifen group and 242 (35%) of the tamoxifen only group (p<0.001). In total there were 321 (47%) and 411 (60%) recurrences, respectively. Disease-free survival was 36% in the radiotherapy plus tamoxifen group and 24% in the tamoxifen alone group (p<0.001). Overall survival was also higher in the radiotherapy group (385 vs 434 deaths; survival 45 vs 36% at 10 years, p=0.03).

INTERPRETATION

Postoperative radiotherapy decreased the risk of locoregional recurrence and was associated with improved survival in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients after mastectomy and limited axillary dissection, with 1 year of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Improved survival in high-risk breast cancer can best be achieved by a strategy of both locoregional and systemic tumour control.

The axilla: to clear or not to clear? That is the question!

The prime objectives for axillary dissection are staging and treatment to cure. No physical examination, no imaging techniques, and no tumor markers can replace axillary dissection for staging. Further, axillary node status in potentially curable breast carcinomas is still considered the single best predictor of outcome and the primary determinant of the use of systemic therapy. Finally, locoregional tumor control seems to improve survival, emphasizing meticulous axillary dissection. Today, the question to be asked is not whether or not to clear the axilla; rather, the question should go: How do we distinguish node-negative patients from those who are node-positive without clearing the axilla unnecessarily? No surgeon would advocate dissecting the axilla in node-negative patients if nodal status could be ascertained by a different technique. Ongoing trials addressing the reliability of the sentinel node technique seem promising, and this technique may perhaps in the near future solve the problem of distinguishing node-negative patients from those with axillary spread. For the time being, the necessity of determining axillary status and to treat for cure can hardly be questioned. Therefore, once axillary spread has been demonstrated in one way or another, an adequate and meticulous axillary dissection should be performed.

Quality control of end results in a Danish adjuvant breast cancer multi-center study

In a Danish multi-center study, quality control was performed on off-study data for high-risk breast cancer patients included in protocols of adjuvant therapy. In the two protocols 4455 patients were randomized and 2477 were registered off-study. Data from these patients were validated by reviewing the patients' records. Incorrect data were observed in 16.2% of the cases who went off-study due to recurrence, other malignant disease or death. In 258 of 2133 patients unidentical locations were demonstrated. Of these, 104 showed a time difference also. A major difference in site of recurrence was found in 107 patients (5.0%), 43 of whom were upstaged from local to a distant recurrence and 64 were downstaged. A time difference of more than 30 days was found in 192 patients (9.0%) and in 17 the difference exceeded 366 days. A time difference only was found in 88 patients (4%). The major parameter in the statistical analysis of the two protocols, i.e. recurrence-free survival, was not significantly influenced by the validation.

Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial

BACKGROUND

Irradiation after mastectomy can reduce locoregional recurrences in women with breast cancer, but whether it prolongs survival remains controversial. We conducted a randomized trial of radiotherapy after mastectomy in high-risk premenopausal women, all of whom also received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF).

METHODS

A total of 1708 women who had undergone mastectomy for pathological stage II or III breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive eight cycles of CMF plus irradiation of the chest wall and regional lymph nodes (852 women) or nine cycles of CMF alone (856 women). The median length of follow-up was 114 months. The end points were locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The frequency of locoregional recurrence alone or with distant metastases was 9 percent among the women who received radiotherapy plus CMF and 32 percent among those who received CMF alone (P<0.001). The probability of survival free of disease after 10 years was 48 percent among the women assigned to radiotherapy plus CMF and 34 percent among those treated only with CMF (P<0.001). Overall survival at 10 years was 54 percent among those given radiotherapy and CMF and 45 percent among those who received CMF alone (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that irradiation after mastectomy significantly improved disease-free survival and overall survival, irrespective of tumor size, the number of positive nodes, or the histopathological grade.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of postoperative irradiation to mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy reduces locoregional recurrences and prolongs survival in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer.

The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9,149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG)

In primary, operable breast cancer, the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) based on tumour size, lymph node stage and histological grade can identify three prognostic groups (PGs) with 10-year survival rates of 83%, 52%, and 13%. With the aim of defining a subset of patients having so good prognosis that adjuvant therapy can be withhold, the NPI was applied to a Danish population-based study group comprising 9,149 patients. As opposed to the British study, we used conventional axillary lymph-node staging. Histological grading was in both studies done by means of a similar slight modification of the Bloom and Richardson procedure, but in the Danish study only ductal carcinomas were graded. The 10-year crude survival was 68.1% for 4,791 patients with tumour size < or = 2 cm and 70.0% for 2,900 patients with grade I tumours. For 4,761 node-negative patients, the 10-year survival was also 70.0%, the expected survival being 89.3%. The relative mortality (observed:expected) was even at 10 years 2.1 demonstrating that more than 10 years observation time is necessary to estimate cumulated mortality. By application of the NPI, the Danish good PG comprising 27.3% of the patients had a 10-year survival of 79.0%. Thus, the index defined a subset with better survival than could be defined individually by each of its three components, but it did not succeed in defining a subset with survival similar to the expected; additional prognostic factors are therefore needed. The somewhat poorer survival of the Danish good PG may be ascribed to the British inclusion of non-ductal carcinomas, to interobserver variation present only in the Danish study, and to poorer expected survival of the Danish patients. The 10-year survival of the Danish moderate PG and poor PG was 56% and 25%, respectively. These improved survival rates are attributed to the administration of adjuvant therapies. There were virtually no node-positive patients in the good PG and no node-negative patients in the poor PG. Patients should therefore still be stratified initially by lymph-node status, but tumour size and histological grade are significant prognostic factors primarily within the node-negative group, and they should be included in future prognostication procedures.

Apparent partial remission of breast cancer in 'high risk' patients supplemented with nutritional antioxidants, essential fatty acids and coenzyme Q10

Thirty-two typical patients with breast cancer, aged 32-81 years and classified 'high risk' because of tumor spread to the lymph nodes in the axilla, were studied for 18 months following an Adjuvant Nutritional Intervention in Cancer protocol (ANICA protocol). The nutritional protocol was added to the surgical and therapeutic treatment of breast cancer, as required by regulations in Denmark. The added treatment was a combination of nutritional antioxidants (Vitamin C: 2850 mg, Vitamin E: 2500 iu, beta-carotene 32.5 iu, selenium 387 micrograms plus secondary vitamins and minerals), essential fatty acids (1.2 g gamma linolenic acid and 3.5 g n-3 fatty acids) and Coenzyme Q10 (90 mg per day). The ANICA protocol is based on the concept of testing the synergistic effect of those categories of nutritional supplements, including vitamin Q10, previously having shown deficiency and/or therapeutic value as single elements in diverse forms of cancer, as cancer may be synergistically related to diverse biochemical dysfunctions and vitamin deficiencies. Biochemical markers, clinical condition, tumor spread, quality of life parameters and survival were followed during the trial. Compliance was excellent. The main observations were: (1) none of the patients died during the study period. (the expected number was four.) (2) none of the patients showed signs of further distant metastases. (3) quality of life was improved (no weight loss, reduced use of pain killers). (4) six patients showed apparent partial remission.

Prognostic, quantitative histopathologic variables in lobular carcinoma of the breast

BACKGROUND

A retrospective investigation of 53 consecutively treated patients with operable lobular carcinoma of the breast, with a median follow-up of 6.6 years, was performed to examine the prognostic value of quantitative histopathologic parameters.

METHODS

The measurements were performed in routinely processed histologic sections using a simple, unbiased technique for the estimation of the three-dimensional mean nuclear volume (vv(nuc)). In addition, quantitative estimates were obtained of the mitotic index (MI), the nuclear index (NI), the nuclear volume fraction (Vv(nuc/tis)), and the mean nuclear profile area (aH(nuc)).

RESULTS

Estimates of vv(nuc), MI, NI, and Vv(nuc/tis) were of significant or marginally significant prognostic value in univariate analyses, whereas no prognostic significance was attributed to estimates of aH(nuc). In multivariate Cox analyses, the clinical stage of disease, vv(nuc), MI, and NI were of significant independent, prognostic value. On the basis of the multivariate analyses, a prognostic index with highly distinguishing capacity between prognostically poor and favorable cases was constructed.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative histopathologic variables are of value for objective grading of malignancy in lobular carcinomas. The new parameter--estimates of the mean nuclear volume--is highly reproducible and suitable for routine use. However, larger and prospective studies are needed to establish the true value of the quantitative histopathologic variables in the clinical management of patients with breast cancer.

Patterns of tumor relapse following mastectomy and adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer. Impact of clinical, histopathologic, and flow cytometric factors

BACKGROUND

This analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of selected clinical, histopathologic, and flow cytometric factors on sites of initial tumor relapse after postmastectomy adjuvant systemic therapy.

METHODS

Five hundred sixty-four patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer were entered in two prospectively randomized trials and received cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil and prednisone with or without tamoxifen as sole adjuvant therapy. These patients were studied to assess the risk of locoregional recurrence and to identify factors that might predict tumor relapse site.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 9.3 years, the 8-year cumulative incidences of initial locoregional or distant relapse were 20% and 35%, respectively. Pathologic tumor stage, estrogen receptor content, and number of involved axillary nodes were independent predictive factors for an increased risk of locoregional recurrence. With the exception of tumor stage, these factors also were associated with an increased risk of distant relapse so that tumor stage (T3a) remained the sole factor predictive of increased relative risk for initial locoregional (versus distant) recurrence in patients with tumor progression. Clinical and flow cytometric factors were not predictive of initial locoregional or distant relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Exploratory data analysis of two prospective trials of postmastectomy adjuvant systemic therapy has demonstrated a significant risk for initial isolated locoregional recurrence in certain patients with node-positive breast cancer. The benefit of improved locoregional tumor control in appropriately selected patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer who receive adjuvant systemic therapy requires additional investigation.

Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy: neurological follow-up in 161 recurrence-free breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

The purpose was to assess the incidence and clinical manifestations of radiation-induced brachial plexopathy in breast cancer patients, treated according to the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group protocols.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and sixty-one recurrence-free breast cancer patients were examined for radiation-induced brachial plexopathy after a median follow-up period of 50 months (13-99 months). After total mastectomy and axillary node sampling, high-risk patients were randomized to adjuvant therapy. One hundred twenty-eight patients were treated with postoperative radiotherapy with 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions over 5 weeks. In addition, 82 of these patients received cytotoxic therapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) and 46 received tamoxifen.

RESULTS

Five percent and 9% of the patients receiving radiotherapy had disabling and mild radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, respectively. Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy was more frequent in patients receiving cytotoxic therapy (p = 0.04) and in younger patients (p = 0.04). The clinical manifestations were paraesthesia (100%), hypaesthesia (74%), weakness (58%), decreased muscle stretch reflexes (47%), and pain (47%).

CONCLUSION

The brachial plexus is more vulnerable to large fraction size. Fractions of 2 Gy or less are advisable. Cytotoxic therapy adds to the damaging effect of radiotherapy. Peripheral nerves in younger patients seems more vulnerable. Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy occurs mainly as diffuse damage to the brachial plexus.

The influence of chemotherapy on survival after recurrence in breast cancer--a population-based study of patients treated in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s

In a population-based study survival after recurrence was compared in three cohorts of patients with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer in 1959, 1969 and 1979, respectively. The use of chemotherapy after recurrence in these cohorts was either none, sporadic or widespread. This allowed a retrospective analysis of the survival impact of chemotherapy. Given the basic assumption that the natural history of breast cancer and the influence of endocrine therapy have not changed significantly during the 20-year period covered by the study, our data suggest that chemotherapy in recurrent breast cancer prolongs survival by 9.5 months in patients who survive more than 2 weeks from the start of treatment for this recurrence.

Adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer

Systemic adjuvant therapy has improved the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. Meta-analyses have demonstrated that approximately one fourth of deaths can be avoided among younger women treated with multiple cytotoxic drug regimens and among older women treated with tamoxifen. However, with the treatments available today many aspects related to the optimal therapy, taking into account the physical, psychological and socioeconomic consequences, are still open. This review discusses some of the major open questions related to the effectiveness of the adjuvant systemic therapy in terms of its ability to reduce recurrence rate and mortality.

The combination of radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-ftorafur) and tamoxifen in stage II breast cancer. Long-term follow-up results of a randomised trial

Two hundred patients with node positive stage II breast cancer were randomised to four groups after radical mastectomy and axillary evacuation: (1) Postoperative radiotherapy, (2) Adjuvant chemotherapy with eight courses of CAFt (cyclophosphamide 500 mg m-2 + doxorubicin 40 mg/m-2 + ftorafur 20 mg kg-1 orally day 1-14) every fourth week, (3) Postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy and (4) postoperative radiation, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen 40 mg daily for 2 years. Thirty-two per cent of the patients discontinued treatment due to GI-toxicity, while 26% required dose reductions due to leukopenia. Radiation pneumonitis was more frequent after the combination of postoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy. There was a better relapse-free survival in the groups receiving chemotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone (P = 0.05), which was highly significant in a multivariate Cox analysis (P = 0.004). No significant survival differences were seen. Tamoxifen had no clear overall effect but there were better relapse-free (P = 0.04) and overall (P = 0.004) survival with tamoxifen in estrogen receptor positive patients, while estrogen receptor negative patients had a somewhat poorer survival (P = 0.07) after tamoxifen. Local control was better (NS) after the combination (93%) radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared to either treatment alone (76% with radiotherapy and 74% with chemotherapy at 5 years).

Intravenous or oral adjuvant CMF for node-positive breast cancer

To assess the optimal duration and method of administration of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy, 116 patients with positive axillary nodes after total mastectomy and axillary dissection were reviewed retrospectively. CMF was administered in three progressively shorter regimens, which consisted of oral CMF for either 12 or six cycles and intravenous (i.v.) CMF for six cycles. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 62 months. The three groups were matched for major prognostic factors. There was no advantage in using more than six cycles of adjuvant CMF. There was an improved crude 3 year disease-free survival (84 vs 65%, P = 0.05) and a trend towards improved overall survival (92 vs 85%, P = NS) in patients treated with six cycles of oral CMF compared with i.v. CMF. Survival rates were not significantly different beyond 3 years. Leucopenia and alopecia were more severe with oral CMF (P less than 0.01), and compliance worse with oral CMF x 12 (P = 0.01). Since the data suggest that i.v. CMF is at least as equal as oral CMF a randomized controlled trial should be undertaken.

Axillary dissection of level I and II lymph nodes is important in breast cancer classification. The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG)

In order to define the term "a node-negative patient", the axillary nodal status at the primary operation for breast cancer was evaluated in 13,851 patients registered by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). The determinants for node negativity in primary breast cancer were the number of lymph nodes removed and the tumour size. The number of lymph nodes removed should be at least 10 to exclude misclassification of node-positive patients as node negative. There was a strong relationship between tumour size and the percentage of node-negative patients. Another observation was that high rate of node negativity was associated with low histological grade. The age of the patients had no influence on node negativity. Where 10 or more negative lymph nodes were removed, significantly better axillary recurrence-free survival (P less than 0.0001), over-all recurrence-free survival (P less than 0.0001) and survival (P less than 0.005) were found.

Evaluation of radiotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: report from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG 82) Trial

The role of postmastectomy irradiation together with systemic treatment was evaluated in high-risk patients included in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) protocol 82. As of June 1989, a total of 1473 pre- and menopausal patients were randomized to postmastectomy irradiation + CMF versus CMF alone (protocol 82-b). A total of 1202 postmenopausal patients were randomized to postmastectomy irradiation + Tamoxifen versus Tamoxifen alone (protocol 82-c). At 5 years the actuarial loco-regional recurrence rate was significantly lower in the irradiated patients (82-b: 9% vs 28%, 82-c: 6% vs 36%). Further, disease-free survival was significantly improved in both pre- and postmenopausal irradiated patients compared with those who had only systemic treatment (82-b: 54% vs 47%, 82-c: 52% vs 38%). At present, overall survival is significantly different in 82-b patients (68% vs 63%) but not in post-menopausal 82-c patients (62% vs 61%). Thus, adjuvant systemic treatment alone (chemotherapy or tamoxifen) did not prevent loco-regional recurrences in high-risk patients after mastectomy and axillary lymph node sampling. However, a longer observation time is necessary to evaluate the consequence of primary optimal loco-regional tumor control in high-risk breast cancer patients with respect to overall survival.

Adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer

Many women will not be cured of breast cancer by even the best early detection and surgical techniques because of micrometastases present at diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy has extended the disease-free interval for most patients and lengthens overall survival for many. Combination chemotherapy has become the standard form of adjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with breast cancer and positive lymph nodes after primary therapy. With minimal toxicity, disease-free and overall survival are improved. Results are less impressive or less clear-cut for postmenopausal women or any woman with negative lymph nodes. Long-term toxicities of adjuvant chemotherapy may include second malignancies and cardiac dysfunction. Although these complications probably are rare, they must be considered seriously when weighing chemotherapy for patients in whom its benefits may be slight. Innovations likely to become standard in adjuvant therapy decision making include risk assessment with new prognostic indicators (growth fraction, oncogene expression) and investigation of dose intensification using bone marrow growth factors and autologous stem-cell support.

Postmastectomy irradiation in high-risk breast cancer patients. Present status of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group trials

All pre- and postmenopausal high-risk breast cancer patients in the protocols DBCG 77 of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group received postmastectomy irradiation before randomization to either adjuvant systemic therapy or no such treatment. The actuarial loco-regional recurrence rate at 9 years was 6-17%, with the lowest rate in patients who also received additional adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen. In a subsequent study (DBCG 82) the role of postmastectomy irradiation together with systemic treatment was evaluated in high-risk patients. Pre- and menopausal patients were randomized to postmastectomy irradiation + CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil), CMF alone or CMF + TAM (tamoxifen). Postmenopausal patients were randomized to postmastectomy irradiation + TAM, TAM or CMF + TAM. At 4 years the loco-regional recurrence rate was significantly lower in the irradiated patients (5-7% vs. 23-33%). Further, disease-free survival was significantly improved in both pre- and postmenopausal irradiated patients compared with those who had only systemic treatment. At present, there are no significant differences between survival in the treatment groups. Thus, adjuvant systemic treatment alone (chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen) did not prevent loco-regional recurrences in high-risk patients after mastectomy and axillary lymph node sampling. However, a longer observation time is necessary to evaluate the consequence of primary optimal loco-regional tumour control in high-risk breast cancer patients with respect to survival.