Surgery for cure followed by chemotherapy in small cell carcinoma of the lung. For the ISC-Lung Cancer Study Group

[Surgery for small-cell lung cancer]

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, metastatic at the time of initial diagnosis in 70% of cases. Within the 30% of localised tumours only 5% of patients are eligible for surgical treatment according to the recommendations of learned societies. These recommendations are mainly based on old phase II and III randomised prospective trials and more recent registry studies. Surgical care is only possible within a multimodal treatment and essentially concerns small-sized tumours without involvement of hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes. As with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lobectomy with radical lymph node removal is the recommended procedure to achieve complete tumour resection. Patient selection for surgery includes age, performance status and comorbidity factors. Adjuvant chemotherapy combining Platinum salts and Etoposide for resected stage I tumours is recommended by ASCO, ACCP and NCCN. The precise sequence of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatments remains controversial because of the large heterogeneity in clinical practice reported in the studies and the context at the time of SCLC discovery. The 5-year survival rate of patients with early stage disease (pT1-2N0M0) treated by lobectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy is between 30% and 58%, which validates the primary place that surgery must have in these early forms. There is certainly little or even no place for such a therapeutic sequence in locally advanced stages (T3-T4 or N2). However, the stage heterogeneity, as in NSCLC, makes final conclusions difficult. In fact, some registry studies with pairing scores reported a median survival of more than 20 months in N2 SCLC. So, all files of SCLC must be evaluated in a multidisciplinary meeting in order to find the optimal solution for patients with rare and heterogeneous tumours.

Surgery in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers and is one of the most aggressive tumors, with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. This review summarizes the main results observed with surgery in SCLC, discussing the critical issues related to the use of this approach. Following two old randomized clinical trials showing no benefit with surgery, several prospective, retrospective, and population-based studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery in addition to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with selected stage I SCLC. Currently, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging within a multimodal approach and after a multidisciplinary evaluation.

Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive tumors, with a rapid growth and early metastases. Approximately 5% of SCLC patients present with early-stage disease (T1,2 N0M0): these patients have a better prognosis, with a 5-year survival up to 50%. Two randomized phase III studies conducted in the 1960s and the 1980s reported negative results with surgery in SCLC patients with early-stage disease and, thereafter, surgery has been largely discouraged. Instead, several subsequent prospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery before or after chemotherapy and followed in most studies by thoracic radiotherapy, with a 5-year survival probability of 36–63% for patients with completely resected stage I SCLC. These results were substantially confirmed by retrospective studies and by large, population-based studies, conducted in the last 40 years, showing the benefit of surgery, particularly lobectomy, in selected patients with early-stage SCLC. On these bases, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging: in these cases, lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy is considered the standard approach. In all cases, surgery can be offered only as part of a multimodal treatment, which includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and after a proper multidisciplinary evaluation.

Predictors of survival following surgical resection of limited-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative radiation (PORT), and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) have been individually examined in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of each adjuvant treatment modality when used in combination after surgical resection of SCLC.

METHODS

Data were collected from 5 cancer centers on all patients with limited-stage SCLC who underwent surgical resection between 1986 and 2019. Univariate and multivariable models were conducted to identify predictors of long-term outcomes, focusing on freedom from recurrence and survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT, and PCI.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression analysis did not identify any adjuvant therapies to significantly influence recurrence in this cohort. Specifically, PORT was not associated with a significant influence on locoregional recurrence and PCI was not significantly associated with intracranial outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival in all stage I through III disease (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.81; P = .005) and even in pathologically node negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.91; P = .024). Although PCI was found to improve survival in univariate analysis, it was not significant in a multivariable model. PORT was not found to affect survival on either univariate or multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is among the largest multi-institutional studies on surgically resected limited-stage SCLC. Our results highlight survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, but did not identify a statistically significant influence from mediastinal PORT or PCI in our cohort. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the benefit of PORT or PCI in a surgically resected limited-stage SCLC population.

Surgery as a Potential Treatment Option for Patients With Stage III Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Surgery is commonly recommended for patients with stage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), whereas chemotherapy and radiotherapy are considered the standard treatment for patients with stage III SCLC. However, recent studies have suggested that a small proportion of patients with SCLC at an advanced stage may benefit from surgical resection. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effectiveness of surgery in patients with stage III SCLC. Patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2013. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate any clinical bias. The overall survival (OS) was determined using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify the effect of surgery on the OS. Of 9606 patients with stage III SCLC, 234 underwent surgery. Compared with the non-surgical group, a higher proportion of patients undergoing surgery had T1 and N0-N1 disease (risen by 10.7% for T1; 12.6% for N0-N1) and a lower proportion had T4 and N3 disease (decreased by 14.3% for T4; 12.5% for N3). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients who underwent surgery had a better OS before and after PSM. The multivariate analysis showed that surgery was beneficial for patients with stage III SCLC (HR: 0.651, 95% CI 0.524–0.808, P < 0.001). In conclusion, surgical resection might be associated with improved OS for patients with stage III SCLC and may be considered for the treatment of these patients. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Association of Chemoradiotherapy With Outcomes Among Patients With Stage I to II vs Stage III Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

There is limited evidence to guide stage I to II small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatment.

Objective

To examine the characteristics and outcomes among patients with stage I to II SCLC treated with modern chemoradiotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this post hoc secondary analysis of the Concurrent Once-Daily vs Twice-Daily Radiotherapy Trial (CONVERT), a multicenter phase 3 trial conducted in patients with limited-stage SCLC from April 7, 2008, to November 29, 2013, patients with TNM stage I to II SCLC were compared with those with stage III disease. Data analysis was performed from November 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018.

Interventions

In CONVERT, patients were randomized to receive twice-daily (45 Gy in 30 fractions) or once-daily (66 Gy in 33 fractions) chemoradiotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was offered, if indicated.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary trial end point was overall survival (OS). TNM staging information was collected prospectively; this was an unplanned analysis because stratification was not performed according to TNM stage.

Results

A total of 509 (277 [54.4%] men; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [8.3] years) of 543 patients (93.7%) with TNM staging information were eligible for this subgroup analysis, and 86 of the 509 (16.9%) had TNM stage I to II disease. The median gross tumor volume was smaller in patients with stage I to II disease (38.4 cm3; range, 2.2-593.0 cm3) compared with patients with stage III disease (93 cm3; range, 0.5-513.4 cm3) (P < .001). No other significant differences were found in baseline and treatment characteristics and chemoradiotherapy adherence between the 2 groups or the number of patients with stage I to II disease (78 [90.7%]) and stage III disease (346 [81.8%]) who received PCI (P = .10). Patients with stage I to II disease achieved longer OS (median, 50 months [95% CI, 38 to not reached months] vs 25 months [95% CI, 21-29 months]; hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44-0.83]; P = .001) compared with patients with stage III disease. In patients with stage I to II disease, no significant survival difference was found between the trial arms (median, 39 months in the once-daily arm vs 72 months in the twice-daily arm; P = .38). Apart from lower incidence of acute esophagitis in patients with stage I to II disease compared with patients with stage III disease (grade ≥3, 9 [11.3%] vs 82 [21.1%]; P < .001), the incidences of acute and late toxic effects were not significantly different.

Conclusions and Relevance

Patients with stage I to II SCLC in CONVERT achieved long-term survival with acceptable toxic effects after chemoradiotherapy and PCI. This study suggests that patients with stage I to II small cell lung cancer treated with modern chemoradiotherapy have better outcomes compared with patients with stage III disease, providing information that practitioners can potentially give their patients to aid clinical decisions.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00433563.

Surgery for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Current treatment guidelines for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) recommend concomitant platinum-based chemo-radiotherapy plus prophylactic cranial irradiation, based on the premise that SCLC disseminates early, and is chemosensitive. However, although there is usually a favourable initial response, relapse is common and the cure rate for limited-stage SCLC remains relatively poor. Some recent clinical practice guidelines have recommended surgery for stage 1 (limited) SCLC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, but this recommendation is largely based on the findings of observational studies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether, in patients with limited-stage SCLC, surgical resection of cancer improves overall survival and treatment-related deaths compared with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, or best supportive care.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed searches on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to 11 January 2017. We handsearched review articles, clinical trial registries, and reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with adults diagnosed with limited-stage SCLC, confirmed by cytology or histology, and radiological assessment, considered medically suitable for resection and radical radiotherapy, which randomised participants to surgery versus any other intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We imported studies identified by the search into a reference manager database. We retrieved the full-text version of relevant studies, and two review authors independently extracted data. The primary outcome measures were overall survival and treatment-related deaths; and secondary outcome measures included loco-regional progression, quality of life, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three trials with 330 participants. We judged the quality of the evidence as very low for all the outcomes. The quality of the data was limited by the lack of complete outcome reporting, unclear risk of bias in the methods in which the studies were conducted, and the age of the studies (> 20 years). The methods of cancer staging and types of surgical procedures, which do not reflect current practice, reduced our confidence in the estimation of the effect.Two studies compared surgery to radiation therapy, and in one study chemotherapy was administered to both arms. One study administered initial chemotherapy, then responders were randomised to surgery versus control; following, both groups underwent chest and whole brain irradiation.Due to the clinical heterogeneity of the trials, we were unable to pool results for meta-analysis.All three studies reported overall survival. One study reported a mean overall survival of 199 days in the surgical arm, compared to 300 days in the radiotherapy arm (P = 0.04). One study reported overall survival as 4% in the surgical arm, compared to 10% in the radiotherapy arm at two years. Conversely, one study reported overall survival at two years as 52% in the surgical arm, compared to 18% in the radiotherapy arm. However this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12).One study reported early postoperative mortality as 7% for the surgical arm, compared to 0% mortality in the radiotherapy arm. One study reported the difference in mean degree of dyspnoea as -1.2 comparing surgical intervention to radiotherapy, indicating that participants undergoing radiotherapy are likely to experience more dyspnoea. This was measured using a non-validated scale.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from currently available RCTs does not support a role for surgical resection in the management of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer; however our conclusions are limited by the quality of the available evidence and the lack of contemporary data. The results of the trials included in this review may not be generalisable to patients with clinical stage 1 small-cell lung cancer carefully staged using contemporary staging methods. Although some guidelines currently recommend surgical resection in clinical stage 1 small-cell lung cancer, prospective randomised controlled trials are needed to determine if there is any benefit in terms of short- and long-term mortality and quality of life compared with chemo-radiotherapy alone.

Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Initial Experience with Ten Tumors in Nine Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes in a small cohort of patients with local or disseminated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received percutaneous thermal ablation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten biopsy-proven SCLC tumors in 9 consecutive patients (5 men, 4 women; average age, 73.8 y ± 12.4) were retrospectively evaluated. Average tumor sizes were 1.8 cm ± 0.5 and 2.6 cm ± 1.2 among patients with local and disseminated disease, respectively. Microwave and radiofrequency ablation were each used for 5 tumors. None of the patients with local SCLC received adjuvant therapy following thermal ablation. Median follow-up duration was 16 months (range, 2-48 mo). Median and 1-year overall survival (OS) were compared for patients in the local and disseminated disease groups.

RESULTS

Median and 1-year OS were better among patients treated for local SCLC compared with disseminated disease (47.0 vs 5.5 mo and 3 [100%] vs 2 [40%], respectively). Pneumothorax occurred in 5 patients (55.6%), and 3 patients received successful outpatient thoracostomy tube placement. No patients were hospitalized, and there were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary analysis suggests favorable outcomes in selected patients with local SCLC who undergo percutaneous thermal ablation without adjuvant therapy.

A review of the role of surgery for small cell lung cancer and the potential prognostic value of enumeration of circulating tumor cells

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is disseminated in the majority of patients at first presentation and, thus, treated with chemoradiotherapy. Despite initial high response rates, chemoresistance appears rapidly and results in a dismal prognosis. However, patients with limited cancer may exhibit better disease control upon surgical treatment. Correct staging is highly critical in the selection of those patients which are likely to benefit from surgery. Studies of the inclusion of surgery in the multimodal treatment of SCLC vary widely in number of patients, selection, treatment and follow-up. Nevertheless surgical therapy for confined SCLCs achieves favorable long-term survival compared to chemoradiotherapy, depending on a precise assessment of the degree of tumor dissemination. Recently, extremely high counts of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were reported in patients with SCLC compared to other malignancies. In several studies the number of CTCs was found to constitute a prognostic parameter and a marker of response to therapy. Therefore, the assessment of CTCs as so-called "Liquid Biopsy" seems to constitute a more precise method to detect tumor dissemination earlier when compared to clinical staging. In conclusion, in the era of precision oncology enumeration and identification of CTCs of SCLC patients have the potential to help in the selection of patients most suitable for tumor surgery.

Role of Adjuvant Therapy in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Early-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Data on optimal adjuvant therapy after complete resection of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are limited, and in particular, there have been no studies evaluating the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without prophylactic cranial irradiation, relative to no adjuvant therapy for stage T1-2N0M0 SCLC. This National Cancer Data Base analysis was performed to determine the potential benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy with and without prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients who undergo complete resection for early-stage small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall survival of patients with pathologic T1-2N0M0 SCLC who underwent complete resection in the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2011, stratified by adjuvant therapy regimen, was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients treated with induction therapy and those who died within 30 days of surgery were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1,574 patients who had pT1-2N0M0 SCLC during the study period, 954 patients (61%) underwent complete R0 resection with a 5-year survival of 47%. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 59% of patients (n = 566), including chemotherapy alone (n = 354), chemoradiation (n = 190, including 99 patients who underwent cranial irradiation), and radiation alone (n = 22). Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation was associated with significantly improved survival. In addition, multivariable Cox modeling demonstrated that treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.95) or chemotherapy with radiation directed at the brain (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.75) was associated with improved survival when compared with no adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pT1-2N0M0 SCLC treated with surgical resection alone have worse outcomes than those who undergo resection with adjuvant chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy with cranial irradiation.

Surgery for small cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises approximately 14% of all lung cancer cases. Most patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease and are therefore treated nonoperatively with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both. A small subset of patients with SCLC present with early-stage disease and will benefit from surgical resection plus chemotherapy. The rationale for radiotherapy in these patients remains controversial.

Evaluation of a cholecystokinin 2 receptor-targeted near-infrared dye for fluorescence-guided surgery of cancer

Surgical resection of malignant disease remains one of the most effective tools for treating cancer. Tumor-targeted near-infrared dyes have the potential to improve contrast between normal and malignant tissues, thereby enabling surgeons to more quantitatively resect malignant disease. Because the cholecystokinin 2 receptor (CCK2R and its tumor-specific splice variant CCK2i4svR) is overexpressed in cancers of the lungs, colon, thyroid, pancreas, and stomach, but absent or inaccessible to parenterally administered drugs in most normal tissues, we have undertaken to design a targeting ligand that can deliver attached near-infrared dyes to CCK2R+ tumors. We report here the synthesis and biological characterization of a CCK2R-targeted conjugate of the near-infrared dye, LS-288 (CRL-LS288). We demonstrate that CRL-LS288 binds selectively to CCK2R+ cancer cells with low nanomolar affinity (Kd = 7 × 10(-9) M). We further show that CRL-LS288 localizes primarily to CCK2R-expressing HEK 293 murine tumor xenografts and that dye uptake in these xenografts is significantly reduced when CCK2R are blocked by preinjection of excess ligand (CRL) or when mice are implanted with CCK2R-negative tumors. Because CRL-LS288 is also found to reveal the locations of distant tumor metastases, we suggest that CRL-LS288 has the potential to facilitate intraoperative identification of malignant disease during a variety of cancer debulking surgeries.

Does surgery improve prognosis in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma?

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol, asking 'does surgery improve prognosis in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC)?' One hundred and thirteen papers were identified, of which the nine papers best able to answer the question were selected and the details of each tabulated. The prohibitive attitude of clinicians toward surgery in SCLC has prevailed since the 1960s, informed by a prospective randomized trial in which 144 patients were assigned to surgical treatment or to radical radiotherapy. Surgery conferred no survival benefit when compared with radical radiotherapy as assessed at 6 monthly intervals up to 10 years post-treatment. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded; however, diagnostic advances subsequent to these trials justify a re-evaluation of the issue, given the greater degree of accuracy with which sub-groups of patients who might benefit from surgery can now be defined. Only one further prospective, randomized trial features in the literature. This study also discerned that no survival benefit was accrued by adding surgery to chemotherapy. However, this study only included patients who responded to an initial course of chemotherapy and also excluded patients with peripheral nodules only. Subsequent investigators have asserted the value of surgery in SCLC. A retrospective case-control study found that surgery significantly improved median survival in patients with stage I disease when compared with patients undergoing medical therapy. One British centre reported survival rates of 52% at 5 years amongst patients undergoing resection and nodal dissection for stage II-IIIA disease. In a retrospective analysis of the Norwegian cancer database, 5-year survival for patients with stage I undergoing surgery was 44.9%, as opposed to 11.3% amongst those treated medically. This finding was echoed in the analysis of the surveillance epidemiology and end results database in the USA, which found improved median survival amongst patients undergoing surgery for limited SCLC. Prospective studies of carefully selected patients have documented good median survival in patients whose tumour was completely resected. We conclude that surgery for early-stage SCLC improves prognosis as part of a multi-modality approach. This echoes the advice of the 2011 national institute of health and clinical excellence guidelines regarding surgery in SCLC.

Surgical Resection for Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pneumonectomy versus Lobectomy

Background. There are some patients with SCLC that are diagnosed in the operating room by cryosection and surgeons had to perform surgical resection for these patients. The aim of this study is to compare the effective of pneumonectomy with lobectomy for SCLC. Methods. A retrospective study was undertaken in 75 patients with SCLC that were diagnosed by cryosection during surgery. 31 of them underwent pneumonectomy, 44 underwent lobectomy. Local recurrence rate and survival rate according to surgical procedures and cancer stages were analyzed. Results. There was significant difference in the overall survival rate between lobectomy and pneumonectomy groups (P = 0.044). For patients with stage II SCLC, the overall survival rate after pneumonectomy was significantly better than after lobectomy (P = 0.028). No significant difference in overall survival rate was found between the two surgical groups in patients with stage III SCLC (P = 0.933). The local recurrence rate in lobectomy group was significant higher that in pneumonectomy group (P = 0.0017). Conclusions. SCLC was responsive to surgical therapy. When surgeons have to select an appropriate method of operation for patients with SCLC during surgery, pneumonectomy may be the right choice for these patients. Pneumonectomy can result in significantly better local control and higher survival rate compare with lobectomy.

[Surgical aspects of the new TNM system for lung cancer]

Recent results of basic research in lung cancer and development of new antitumoral drugs provided the bases for the revision of TNM system of lung cancer. In addition, the VI-th Edition of TNM classification was based on a relatively small database anyway. Multicentric analysis and biostatistical evaluation were carried out by the initiation of IASCL. 100869 patients were collected and 81015 cases were included in the analysis finally (NSCLC: 67725, SCLC: 13290). The aim of the study was to modify T, N as well as M factors of the classification. The recommendations were based on a large international database and survival analysis of that. It is expected that this change will influence treatment algorithms of lung cancer and it will improve survival of patients therefore.

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals regarding the relevance of TNM in the pathologic staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

For more than 50 years, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been staged mainly as either limited or extensive stage disease. Small published series of resected SCLC have suggested that the tumor, node, metastases (TNM) pathologic staging correlates with the survival of resected patients. Recent analysis of the 8088 cases of SCLC in the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) database demonstrated the usefulness of clinical TNM staging in this malignancy. The IASLC data bank contains an unprecedented number of resected SCLC cases with pathologic staging information. This analysis was undertaken to examine the impact of the TNM system on the pathologic staging of SCLC and to assess the new IASLC proposals in this subtype of lung cancer.

METHODS

Using the IASLC database, survival analyses were performed for resected patients with SCLC. Prognostic groups were compared, and the new IASLC TNM proposals were applied to this population and to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

RESULTS

The IASLC database contained 349 cases of resected SCLC where pathologic TNM staging was available. Survival after resection correlated with both T and N category with nodal status having a stronger influence on survival. Stage groupings using the 6th edition of TNM clearly identify patient subgroups with different prognoses. The IASLC proposals for the 7th edition of TNM classification also apply to this population and to the SEER database.

CONCLUSION

This analysis further strengthens our previous recommendation to use TNM staging for all SCLC cases.

[Small cell lung cancer]

With about 20% of all lung cancers small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents a major subset of this entity. Although therapeutic improvements did not receive as much attention as in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many small steps of clinical progress have been achieved within the last 20 years. An optimal treatment should be based on an interdisciplinary treatment plan. The standard treatment in localized stages represents combined radiation and chemotherapy. Cisplatin and etoposide are in this concern considered as a gold standard. 3D-planned conformal radiotherapy should start as early as possible and should be applied concomitantly to chemotherapy and in certain cases even in a hyperfractionated treatment protocol. In very early stages surgical resection could be an option in selected cases. In advanced stages a platinum-based doublet offers high response rates. As already established in limited disease prophylactic cranial irradiation is now also indicated in extensive disease in case of any tumor remission. In the second line treatment and in patients with reduced performance status topotecan is recommended. Similar as in NSCLC pemetrexed might become an alternative treatment option in the second line setting. In the field of new targeted therapies bevacizumab achieved the most promising results. The present review highlights historical milestones and up-to-date trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. Furthermore, the role of experimental strategies and the management of certain special clinical situations are discussed.

[Updated strategies in Small Cell Lung Cancer post ASCO 2007]

Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is associated with intensive nicotine consumption and characterized by a very aggressive growth rate. Furthermore, metastases often appear very early. At the annual meeting of the "American Society of Clinical Oncology" (ASCO) 2007, recent issues which will influence the daily clinical practice were presented. New chemotherapy combinations such as carboplatin/irinotecan or pemetrexed as well as targeted therapies e.g. bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy could extend our therapeutic options. A genetic polymorphism, which influences the pharmacokinetic of irinotecan, turned out to be one reason for the different outcome of an irinotecan/cisplatin therapy in a Japanese and Northern American population. In the field of radiotherapy, a phase III study showed for the first time a significant benefit in overall survival by prophylactic cranial radiation in the setting of extensive disease.

The role of pulmonary resection in small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the outcome of surgical resection for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent thoracotomy for SCLC at our institution from January 1985 to July 2002. All patients were staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system.

RESULTS

The median age of the 77 patients (44 men and 33 women) was 65 years (range, 35-85 years). Operations performed included thoracotomy with biopsy of hilar mass in 10 patients, wedge excision in 30 (6 with talc pleurodesis), segmentectomy in 4, lobectomy in 28, bilobectomy in 3, and pneumonectomy in 2. Mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 50 patients and lymph node sampling in 19. Postoperative therapy Included chemotherapy alone in 20 patients, radiation therapy in 3, and combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in 40. Median tumor diameter was 4 cm (range, 1.0-10.0 cm). Postsurgical tumor stage was IA in 7 patients, IB in 11, IIA in 8, IIB in 7, IIIA in 30, IIIB in 10, and IV in 4. A total of 19 patients (25%) had complications: atrial arrhythmia in 7 patients, pneumonia in 6, prolonged air leak in 3, and myocardial infarction, postoperative bleeding, and cerebrovascular accident in 1 each. Operative mortality was 3% (2/77). Follow-up ranged from 4 days to 170 months (median, 19 months). At last follow-up, 20 patients were alive. The estimated overall 5-year survival was 27% when excluding the 10 patients who underwent a biopsy without additional surgery. Five-year survival for stage I and II combined (n=33) was 38% compared with only 16% for stage III and IV combined (n=34) (P=.02). Overall median survival was 24 months; median survival for patients who underwent curative surgery was 25 months compared with 16 months for those who had a palliative procedure (P=.34).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary resection in patients with stage I or stage II SCLC is safe with low mortality and morbidity. Curative resection is associated with long-term survival in early stage SCLC in some patients and should be considered in selected patients.

Surgical resection of limited disease small cell lung cancer in the new era of platinum chemotherapy: Its time has come

OBJECTIVE

Although resection is not the standard of care in treating small cell lung cancer, new platinum drugs and modern staging have allowed the role of surgery to be reevaluated.

METHODS

We reviewed our institutional experience of 1415 patients with small cell lung cancer from 1976 to 2002 among whom 82 (6%) underwent surgery with curative intent.

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was 62 years, and small cell lung cancer of mixed morphology represented 14 of 82 (17%). Treatment consisted of surgery alone in 11% of cases (9/82), surgery with neoadjuvant therapy in 22% (18/82), and surgery with adjuvant therapy in 55% (45/82). Prophylactic cranial irradiation was given to 23% (19/82). The 5-year survival of the entire cohort was 42%. The 5-year survival of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 41) was significantly different according to whether patients had received platinum or nonplatinum regimens (68% vs 32.2%, P = .04). Among patients with stage I disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24), the 5-year survivals for patients receiving platinum and nonplatinum chemotherapy were 86% and 42%, respectively ( P < .02). If patients who received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy (n = 56) were considered, the 5-year survival was significantly better for platinum than for nonplatinum chemotherapy (62% vs 36%, P = .05). The 5-year survival was also better for those undergoing lobectomies (n = 52) than for those with limited resections (n = 15, 50% vs 20%, P = .03). Survival outcomes also differed by gender, with female patients having a 5-year survival advantage over male patients (60% vs 28%, P = .004).

CONCLUSION

These results support a reevaluation of the role of surgery in the multimodality therapy for small cell lung cancer, which currently includes only radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Should aggressive surgery ever be part of the management of small cell lung cancer?

CMT with surgery and chemotherapy is feasible, the toxicity is manageable, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are acceptable. Patient selection is important, and the results of the LCSG trial indicate that surgical resection will not benefit most patients who have limited SCLC. The chances of long-term survival and cure are strongly correlated with pathologic TNM stage. Consideration of surgery for patients who have SCLC should be limited to those with stage I disease and perhaps some patients with stage II tumors. Therefore, before surgery is undertaken, patients should undergo extensive radiologic staging with CT, MRI, and perhaps even positron emission tomographic scanning and mediastinoscopy, even if the radiologic assessment of the mediastinum is negative. Surgery may be considered for patients with T1-T2 NO SCLC tumors, and whether it is offered as the initial treatment or after induction chemotherapy remains controversial [40,43]. If SCLC is identified unexpectedly at the time of thoracotomy, complete resection and mediastinal lymph node resection should be undertaken, if possible. Chemotherapy is recommended postoperatively for all patients, even those with pathologic stage I tumors. Surgery likely has very little role to play for most patients with stage II disease and virtually no role for patients with stage III tumors. Even though chemotherapy can result in dramatic shrinkage of bulky mediastinal tumors, the addition of surgical resection does not contribute significantly to long-term survival for most patients, as shown conclusively by the LCSG trial. The final group of patients who may benefit from surgical resection are those with combined small cell and non-small cell tumors. If a mixed-histology cancer is identified at diagnosis, the initial treatment should be chemotherapy to control the small cell component of the disease, and surgery should be considered for the non-small cell component. For patients who demonstrate an unexpectedly poor response to chemotherapy, and for patients who experience localized late relapse after treatment for pure small cell tumors, a repeat biopsy should be performed. Surgery may be considered if residual NSCLC is confirmed.

Small cell lung cancer: from molecular biology to novel therapeutics

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor which metastasizes early. Patients with this disease have a poor prognosis even with immediate treatment. Because of the aggressive nature of this disease, all aspects of this tumor are studied extensively. This review will provide an update of the biology of SCLC at both the molecular and cellular levels. Cellular pathways and their relationship to cellular function will also be discussed. Treatment of both primary limited- and extensive-stage diseases as well as recurrent disease will be discussed including chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy, and surgery. The role of novel therapeutics being investigated will also be addressed.

Surgery in small-cell lung carcinoma. Where is the rationale?

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the keys of current management of SCLC. For many years, the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer has been considered a contraindication to surgery because radiotherapy was at least equivalent in terms of local control and the rate of resectability of SCLC patients was poor. The role of surgery has been defined by evidence accumulated in the last 30 years but conclusions are limited by the fact that the most important studies are dated and conducted when the main staging tool was exploratory thoracotomy. The rationale for surgery in the context of SCLC is based on 3 factors: 1) Several historical series on patients operated for limited SCLC reported some long term survivors, showing that permanent cure can be achieved. For this reason, it is now accepted that for the rare patients with very limited stage disease (T1-T2 tumors) surgical resection followed by platinum-based chemotherapy could be offered. 2) After chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the rate of local relapse is 20-30%. The assumption that surgery might be superior to radiotherapy in local control of limited SCLC has been suggested but not still proved. 3) Surgery can precisely assess pathological response to chemotherapy, identify carcinoids erroneously diagnosed as SCLC, treat the NSCLC component of tumors with a mixed histology. In the case of planned surgery, preoperative investigations should be completed by MRI of the brain, mediastinoscopy (to rule out subclinical N2/N3 patients) and probably PET scan. Even if some controversies exist, it is accepted that surgery can be proposed as the first treatment in patents with T1-T2 lesions without sign of lymph nodes involvement, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery in stage II and III must be planned on a multidisciplinary basis, in the context of controlled clinical trials.

Surgical treatment of small cell lung cancer

Chemoradiotherapy remains a gold standard in the treatment of limited-disease small cell lung cancer. Currently, three indications for the surgical treatment of very limited disease (stage I, II, or highly selected IIIa) small cell lung cancer can be identified: (1) primary surgery in peripheral clinical N0 lesions followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; (2) primary chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery +/- radiotherapy in patients with a good response to initial treatment; and (3) salvage operations in patients who recur or persist at the primary site but still have resectable disease. The value of these approaches has been assessed in retrospective analyses and prospective nonrandomized trials. A large prospective randomized trial failed to prove any added value for surgery in the multidisciplinary treatment of limited-disease small cell lung cancer, but very few very-limited-disease patients were included.

Surgical results for small cell lung cancer based on the new TNM staging system. Thoracic Surgery Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

BACKGROUND

Operation with combined chemotherapy has been recently recommended for very early stage of small cell lung cancer without lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken in 91 patients who had undergone pulmonary resection for small cell lung cancer according to the new international staging system.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall probability of survival was 37.1%. The 5-year survival rate was 100% for p-stage 0, 56.1% for p-stage IA, 30.0% for p-stage IB, 57.1% for p-stage IIA, and 42.9% for p-stage IIB. In the p-stage IA-IIB patients who underwent a complete resection, the 5-year survival rate of the patients treated by operation with chemotherapy was better than that of patients treated by operation alone. In addition, the 5-year survival rate of the patients who had four or more courses of chemotherapy was 80.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that operation should be considered for p-stage IA-IIB patients and more than four courses of combined chemotherapy might be desirable in these resectable cases.

Surgery in limited stage small cell lung cancer

The role of surgery in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is controversial. Surgery has several potential advantages because it may reduce the frequency of local relapses, it does not impede the intensity of chemotherapy, it does not affect the bone marrow, and surgical staging may be of prognostic significance. Several smaller retrospective studies which focus on surgery alone, surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or chemotherapy followed by adjuvant surgery have been reported. Five-year survival data have ranged from 10-50% according to stage, both T-status and nodal status appearing to be significant prognostic factors. Only one prospective randomized trial has been reported concerning the addition of surgery to chemotherapy alone. This trial does not favour surgery. The reason for this could be a selection bias in the smaller non-randomized studies or a result of stage migration. Nevertheless, surgery may yet play an important role in SCLC, especially in diagnosis and staging, and with new improved non-invasive staging procedures, such as positron emission tomography, resection may lead to cure in selected patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to settle this issue.