1
|
Noël G, Bou-Gharios J, Burckel H. Tumor reirradiation: Issues, challenges and perspectives for radiobiology. Cancer Radiother 2024:S1278-3218(24)00126-4. [PMID: 39327200 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
The radiobiology of tumor reirradiation is poorly understood. It pertains to tumors and their sensitivity at the time of relapse, encompassing primary tumors, metastases, or secondary cancers developed in or proximal to previously irradiated tissues. The ability to control the pathology depends, in part, on understanding this sensitivity. To date, literature data remains limited regarding changes in the radiosensitivity of tissues after initial irradiation, and most proposals are based on conjecture. The response of healthy tissues at the site of irradiation raises concerns about radio-induced complications. Cumulative dose is likely a major factor in this risk, thus using equivalent dose calculations might help reduce the risk of complications. However, the correlation between mathematical equivalence formulas and clinical effects of radiobiological origin is weak, and the lack of knowledge of the alpha/beta (α/β) ratio of healthy tissues remains an obstacle to the extensive use of these formulas. However, tissues exposed to recovery dose may have a tolerance to irradiation much higher than assumed, thus further biological work remains to be developed. Also, the functionality of previously irradiated tissues could be useful in selecting the most suitable irradiation beams. Finally, research on the genomics of irradiated healthy tissues could improve the prediction of side effects and personalize radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Noël
- Radiotherapy Department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, BP 23025, 67033 Strasbourg, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Radiobiology Laboratory, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Laboratory of Engineering, Informatics and Imaging (ICube), Integrative Multimodal Imaging in Healthcare (Imis), UMR 7357, université de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Jolie Bou-Gharios
- Radiobiology Laboratory, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Laboratory of Engineering, Informatics and Imaging (ICube), Integrative Multimodal Imaging in Healthcare (Imis), UMR 7357, université de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Hélène Burckel
- Radiobiology Laboratory, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Laboratory of Engineering, Informatics and Imaging (ICube), Integrative Multimodal Imaging in Healthcare (Imis), UMR 7357, université de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tong E, Horsley P, Wheeler H, Wong M, Venkatesha V, Chan J, Kastelan M, Back M. Hypofractionated re-irradiation with bevacizumab for relapsed chemorefractory glioblastoma after prior high dose radiotherapy: a feasible option for patients with large-volume relapse. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:69-76. [PMID: 38551747 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04643-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There remains no standard of care for patients with recurrent and chemorefractory glioblastoma. Re-irradiation (reRT) provides an additional management option. However, published series predominantly focus on small reRT volumes utilizing stereotactic hypofractionated regimens. Concerns regarding toxicity have limited utilisation of reRT for larger recurrences, however this may be mitigated with use of bevacizumab (BEV). METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospective database of patients managed with the EORTC-NCIC (Stupp) protocol 60 Gy chemoradiotherapy protocol for glioblastoma between 2007 and 2021 was reviewed for those patients receiving reRT for chemorefractory relapse. Serial MRI and PET were used to establish true progression and exclude patients with pseudoprogression or radionecrosis from reRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from date of reRT. Prognostic factors were also assessed. RESULTS 447 patients managed for glioblastoma under the Stupp protocol were identified, of which 372 had relapsed and were thus eligible for reRT. 71 patients underwent reRT. Median relapse-free survival from diagnosis for the reRT and overall cohorts were similar at 11.6 months (95%CI:9.4-14.2) and 11.8 months (95%CI:9.4-14.2) respectively. 60/71 (85%) reRT patients had received BEV prior to reRT and continued concurrent BEV during reRT. Of the 11 patients not managed with BEV during reRT, 10 required subsequent salvage BEV. ReRT patients were younger (median 53 vs. 59 years, p < 0.001), had better performance status (86% vs. 69% ECOG 0-1, p = 0.002) and more commonly had MGMT promoter-methylated tumours (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.083) compared to non-reRT patients. Median reRT PTV volume was 135cm3 (IQR: 69-207cm3). Median OS from reRT to death was 7.1 months (95%CI:6.3-7.9). Patients aged < 50, 50-70 and > 70 years had post-reRT median OS of 7.7, 6.4 and 6.0 months respectively (p = 0.021). Median post-reRT survival was longer for patients with ECOG performance status 0-1 compared to 2-3 (8.1 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.039). PTV volume, site of relapse, MGMT promoter-methylation status and extent of initial surgical resection were not associated with post-reRT survival. ReRT was well-tolerated. Out of the 6 patients (8%) admitted to hospital after reRT, only one was for reRT toxicity. This was a CTCAE grade 3 radiation necrosis event in a patient managed without prior BEV. CONCLUSION Patients with recurrent glioblastoma who have been previously treated with 60 Gy radiotherapy have a meaningful survival benefit from large volume re-irradiation which is well tolerated. ReRT should not be ignored as a salvage treatment option in patients with chemorefractory progressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa Tong
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Patrick Horsley
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Helen Wheeler
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Wong
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
| | - Venkatesha Venkatesha
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Joseph Chan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Marina Kastelan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW, Australia
- GenesisCare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Straube C, Combs SE, Bernhardt D, Gempt J, Meyer B, Zimmer C, Schmidt-Graf F, Vajkoczy P, Grün A, Ehret F, Zips D, Kaul D. Adjuvant re-irradiation vs. no early re-irradiation of resected recurrent glioblastoma: pooled comparative cohort analysis from two tertiary centers. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:49-56. [PMID: 38520571 PMCID: PMC11093803 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04633-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management strategy for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains uncertain, and the impact of re-irradiation (Re-RT) on overall survival (OS) is still a matter of debate. This study included patients who achieved gross total resection (GTR) after a second surgery after recurrence, following the GlioCave criteria. METHODS Inclusion criteria include being 18 years or older, having histologically confirmed locally recurrent IDHwt or IDH unknown GBM, achieving MRI-proven GTR after the second surgery, having a Karnofsky performance status of at least 60% after the second surgery, having a minimum interval of 6 months between the first radiotherapy and the second surgery, and a maximum of 8 weeks from second surgery to the start of Re-RT. RESULTS A total of 44 patients have met the inclusion criteria. The median OS after the second surgery was 14 months. All patients underwent standard treatment after initial diagnosis, including maximum safe resection, adjuvant radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Re-RT did not significantly impact OS. However, MGMT promoter methylation status and a longer interval (> 12 months) between treatments were associated with better OS. Multivariate analysis revealed the MGMT status as the only significant predictor of OS. CONCLUSION Factors such as MGMT promoter methylation status and treatment interval play crucial roles in determining patient outcomes after second surgery. Personalized treatment strategies should consider these factors to optimize the management of rGBM. Prospective research is needed to define the value of re-RT after second surgery and to inform decision making in this situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tam A, Scarpi E, Maltoni MC, Rossi R, Fairchild A, Dennis K, Vaska M, Kerba M. A Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Cancer Receiving Palliative Radiotherapy: Evidence-Based Recommendations. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1654. [PMID: 38730606 PMCID: PMC11083084 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Prognostication in patients with cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy remains a challenge. To improve the process, we aim to identify prognostic factors in this population from the literature and offer evidence-based recommendations on prognostication in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for non-curable or advanced cancers. (2) Methods: A systematic review was performed on the medical literature from 2005 to 2023 to extract papers on the prognosis of palliative radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer. The initial selection was performed by at least two authors to determine study relevance to the target area. Studies were then classified based on type and evidence quality to determine final recommendations. (3) Results: The literature search returned 57 papers to be evaluated. Clinical and biological prognostic factors were identified from these papers to improve clinical decision making or construct prognostic models. Twenty prognostic models were identified for clinical use. There is moderate evidence supporting (i) evidence-based factors (patient, clinical, disease, and lab) in guiding decision making around palliative radiation; (ii) that certain biological factors are of importance; (iii) prognostication models in patients with advanced cancer; and that (iv) SBRT or re-irradiation use can be guided by predictions of survival by prognostic scores or clinicians. Patients with more favorable prognoses are generally better suited to SBRT or re-irradiation, and the use of prognostic models can aid in this decision making. (4) Conclusions: This evaluation has identified several factors or tools to aid in prognosis and clinical decision making. Future studies should aim to further validate these tools and factors in a clinical setting, including the leveraging of electronic medical records for data availability. To increase our understanding of how causal factors interact with palliative radiotherapy, future studies should also examine and include prediction of response to radiation as an outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tam
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - Emanuela Scarpi
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Marco Cesare Maltoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Romina Rossi
- Palliative Care Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Alysa Fairchild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada;
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Marcus Vaska
- Knowledge Resource Service, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada;
| | - Marc Kerba
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moore-Palhares D, Chen H, Keith J, Wang M, Myrehaug S, Tseng CL, Detsky J, Perry J, Lim-Fat MJ, Heyn C, Maralani P, Lipsman N, Das S, Sahgal A, Soliman H. Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma: an analysis of prognostic factors for survival and predictors of radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:541-551. [PMID: 37256526 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04340-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) is a heterogeneous population, and the ideal patient selection for re-irradiation (re-RT) has yet to be established. This study aims to identify prognostic factors for rHGG patients treated with re-RT. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults with rHGG who underwent re-RT from 2009 to 2020 from our institutional database. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included prognostic factors for early death (< 6 months after re-RT) and predictors of radiation necrosis (RN). RESULTS For the 79 patients identified, the median OS after re-RT was 9.9 months (95% CI 8.3-11.6). On multivariate analyses, re-resection at progression (HR 0.56, p = 0.027), interval from primary treatment to first progression ≥ 16.3 months (HR 0.61, p = 0.034), interval from primary treatment to re-RT ≥ 23.9 months (HR 0.35, p < 0.001), and re-RT PTV volume < 112 cc (HR 0.27, p < 0.001) were prognostic for improved OS. Patients who had unmethylated-MGMT tumours (OR 12.4, p = 0.034), ≥ 3 prior systemic treatment lines (OR 29.1, p = 0.022), interval to re-RT < 23.9 months (OR 9.0, p = 0.039), and re-RT PTV volume ≥ 112 cc (OR 17.8, p = 0.003) were more likely to die within 6 months of re-RT. The cumulative incidence of RN was 11.4% (95% CI 4.3-18.5) at 12 months. Concurrent bevacizumab use (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) and cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2, α/β = 2) < 99 Gy2 (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) were independent protective factors against RN. Re-RT allowed for less corticosteroid dependency. Sixty-six percent of failures after re-RT were in-field. CONCLUSION We observe favorable OS rates following re-RT and identified prognostic factors, including methylation status, that can assist in patient selection and clinical trial design. Concurrent use of bevacizumab mitigated the risk of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Moore-Palhares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Julia Keith
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - James Perry
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Jane Lim-Fat
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chris Heyn
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luo T, Feng J, Sun P. Fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 229:107728. [PMID: 37105068 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical benefit and the safety of fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation in treating patients with recurrent glioblastoma are still disputed. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the clinical benefit and the safety of fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrieved the eligible papers published up to Nov. 2022 through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials. Gov, and other biomedical databases and evaluated the quality of the studies by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The random effect model was used to pool 12-month overall survival rates, 12-month progression-free survival rates, and radiational necrosis risk, and an interaction test was used to compare defined subgroups. RESULTS We identified eight eligible studies, including 307 patients. The overall survival rate of 12 months was 33.1 % (95 % CI 26.0 %-40.9 %), and the progression-free survival rate of 12 months was 13.4 % (95 % CI 8.0 %-21.3 %). Radiation necrosis was low in incidence in the included studies. Additionally, the subgroup analysis demonstrated that factors such as age, time interval (from the first radiation to the re-irradiation), total dose, and single dose, impacted the survival rate. CONCLUSION Fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation produces relative clinical benefit and safety for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingfan Luo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin Feng
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Pengfei Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Opijnen MP, Broekman MLD, de Vos FYF, Cuppen E, van der Hoeven JJM, van Linde ME, Compter A, Beerepoot LV, van den Bent MJ, Vos MJ, Fiebrich HB, Koekkoek JAF, Hoeben A, Kho KH, Driessen CML, Jeltema HR, Robe PAJT, Maas SLN. Study protocol of the GLOW study: maximising treatment options for recurrent glioblastoma patients by whole genome sequencing-based diagnostics—a prospective multicenter cohort study. BMC Med Genomics 2022; 15:233. [PMID: 36333718 PMCID: PMC9636658 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-022-01343-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common glial primary brain tumour, is without exception lethal. Every year approximately 600 patients are diagnosed with this heterogeneous disease in The Netherlands. Despite neurosurgery, chemo -and radiation therapy, these tumours inevitably recur. Currently, there is no gold standard at time of recurrence and treatment options are limited. Unfortunately, the results of dedicated trials with new drugs have been very disappointing. The goal of the project is to obtain the evidence for changing standard of care (SOC) procedures to include whole genome sequencing (WGS) and consequently adapt care guidelines for this specific patient group with very poor prognosis by offering optimal and timely benefit from novel therapies, even in the absence of traditional registration trials for this small volume cancer indication. Methods The GLOW study is a prospective diagnostic cohort study executed through collaboration of the Hartwig Medical Foundation (Hartwig, a non-profit organisation) and twelve Dutch centers that perform neurosurgery and/or treat GBM patients. A total of 200 patients with a first recurrence of a glioblastoma will be included. Dual primary endpoint is the percentage of patients who receive targeted therapy based on the WGS report and overall survival. Secondary endpoints include WGS report success rate and number of targeted treatments available based on WGS reports and number of patients starting a treatment in presence of an actionable variant. At recurrence, study participants will undergo SOC neurosurgical resection. Tumour material will then, together with a blood sample, be sent to Hartwig where it will be analysed by WGS. A diagnostic report with therapy guidance, including potential matching off-label drugs and available clinical trials will then be sent back to the treating physician for discussing of the results in molecular tumour boards and targeted treatment decision making. Discussion The GLOW study aims to provide the scientific evidence for changing the SOC diagnostics for patients with a recurrent glioblastoma by investigating complete genome diagnostics to maximize treatment options for this patient group. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05186064. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01343-4.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ciammella P, Cozzi S, Botti A, Giaccherini L, Sghedoni R, Orlandi M, Napoli M, Pascarella R, Pisanello A, Russo M, Cavallieri F, Ruggieri MP, Cavuto S, Savoldi L, Iotti C, Iori M. Safety of Inhomogeneous Dose Distribution IMRT for High-Grade Glioma Reirradiation: A Prospective Phase I/II Trial (GLIORAD TRIAL). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194604. [PMID: 36230525 PMCID: PMC9562035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor, and despite advances in imaging techniques and treatment options, the outcome remains poor and recurrence is inevitable. Salvage therapy presents a challenge, and re-irradiation can be a therapeutic option in recurrent GBM. The decision-making process for re-irradiation is a challenge for radiation oncologists due to the expected toxicity of a second course of radiotherapy and the limited radiation tolerance of normal tissue; nevertheless, it is being increasingly used, as several studies have demonstrated its feasibility. The current study aimed to investigate the safety of moderate–high-voxel-based dose escalation radiotherapy in recurrent GBM patients after conventional concurrent chemoradiation. Twelve patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Retreatment consisted of re-irradiation with a total dose range of 30–50 Gy over 5 days using the IMRT (arc VMAT) technique using dose painting planning. The treatment was well tolerated. No toxicities greater than 3 were recorded; only one patient had severe G3 acute toxicity, characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. Median overall survival (OS2) and progression-free survival (PFS2) from the time of re-irradiation were 10.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively. Our phase I study demonstrated an acceptable tolerance profile of this approach, and the future prospective phase II study will analyze the efficacy in terms of PFS and OS. Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive astrocytic primary brain tumor, and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) followed by maintenance of adjuvant TMZ is the current standard of care. Despite advances in imaging techniques and multi-modal treatment options, the median overall survival (OS) remains poor. As an alternative to surgery, re-irradiation (re-RT) can be a therapeutic option in recurrent GBM. Re-irradiation for brain tumors is increasingly used today, and several studies have demonstrated its feasibility. Besides differing techniques, the published data include a wide range of doses, emphasizing that no standard approach exists. The current study aimed to investigate the safety of moderate–high-voxel-based dose escalation in recurrent GBM. From 2016 to 2019, 12 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Retreatment consisted of re-irradiation with a total dose of 30 Gy (up to 50 Gy) over 5 days using the IMRT (arc VMAT) technique. A dose painting by numbers (DPBN)/dose escalation plan were performed, and a continuous relation between the voxel intensity of the functional image set and the risk of recurrence in that voxel were used to define target and dose distribution. Re-irradiation was well tolerated in all treated patients. No toxicities greater than G3 were recorded; only one patient had severe G3 acute toxicity, characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. Median overall survival (OS2) and progression-free survival (PFS2) from the time of re-irradiation were 10.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively; 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS2 were 92%, 75%, and 42%, respectively; and 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS2 were 83%, 42%, and 8%, respectively. Our work demonstrated a tolerable tolerance profile of this approach, and the future prospective phase II study will analyze the efficacy in terms of PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3297317608
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lucia Giaccherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Roberto Sghedoni
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Matteo Orlandi
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Manuela Napoli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Rosario Pascarella
- Neuroradiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Anna Pisanello
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Marco Russo
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Silvio Cavuto
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Luisa Savoldi
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Mauro Iori
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
High-dose salvage re-irradiation in recurrent/progressive adult diffuse gliomas: development of a novel prognostic scoring system. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:994-1001. [PMID: 35715356 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Over the past two decades, high-dose salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) has been used increasingly in the multimodality management of adults with recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. Several factors that determine outcomes following re-RT have been incorporated into prognostic models to guide patient selection. We aimed to develop a novel four-tiered prognostic model incorporating relevant molecular markers from our single-institutional cohort of patients treated with high-dose salvage re-RT for recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Various patient, disease, and treatment-related factors impacting upon survival following salvage re-RT were identified through univariate analysis. Each of these prognostic factors was further subdivided and assigned scores of 0 (low-risk), 1 (intermediate-risk), or 2 (high-risk). Scores from individual prognostic factors were added to derive the cumulative score (ranging from 0 to 16), with increasing scores indicating worsening prognosis. RESULTS A total of 111 adults with recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma treated with salvage high-dose re-RT were included. We could assign patients into four prognostic subgroups (A=15 patients, score 0-3); (B=50 patients, score 4-7); (C=33 patients, score 8-10); and (D=13 patients, score 11-16) with completely non-overlapping survival curves suggesting the good discriminatory ability. Post-re-RT survival was significantly higher in Group A compared to groups B, C, and D, respectively (stratified log-rank p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSION There exists a lack of universally acceptable 'standard-of-care' salvage therapy for recurrent/progressive diffuse glioma. A novel four-tiered prognostic scoring system incorporating traditional factors as well as relevant molecular markers is proposed for selecting patients appropriately for high-dose salvage re-RT that warrants validation in a non-overlapping cohort.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ziu M, Goyal S, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of radiation therapy in the management of progressive and recurrent glioblastoma in adults. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:255-264. [PMID: 34748120 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03857-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients (18 years of age and above) with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) after first line combined multimodality treatment. QUESTION Can re-irradiation (by using conventional radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery) be used in patients with pGBM after the first adjuvant combined multimodality treatment with radiation and chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: When the target tumor is amenable for additional radiation, re-irradiation is recommended as it provides improved local tumor control, as measured by best imaging response. Such re-irradiation can take the form of conventional fractionation radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery. LEVEL III Re-Irradiation is recommended in order to maintain or improve a patient's neurological status and quality of life prior to any further tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA.
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Neurosciences, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
| | - Sharad Goyal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lautenschlaeger FS, Dumke R, Schymalla M, Hauswald H, Carl B, Stein M, Keber U, Jensen A, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Eberle F. Comparison of carbon ion and photon reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:427-435. [PMID: 34523017 PMCID: PMC9038837 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01844-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Purpose of this study was to investigate overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with either carbon ion reirradiation or photon reirradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study we evaluated 78 consecutive patients with recurrent IDH (Isocitrate dehydrogenase)-wildtype glioblastoma (38 patients carbon ion re-radiotherapy, 40 patients photon re-radiotherapy) treated with either carbon ion reirradiation or stereotactic photon reirradiation. 45 Gy (RBE; 15 fractions) carbon ion reirradiation (CIRT) or 39 Gy (13 fractions) photon reirradiation (FSRT) was administered, respectively. Overall survival was investigated with respect to histological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox statistics were calculated. A propensity score-matched analysis of the FSRT and CIRT groups using variables from a validated prognosis score was carried out. RESULTS The type of reirradiation (CIRT vs. FSRT) significantly influenced overall survival-8.0 months vs. 6.5 months (univariate: p = 0.046)-and remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). Propensity score-adjusted analysis with CIRT versus FSRT as the dependent variable yielded a significant overall survival advantage for the CIRT group (median OS 8.9 versus 7.2 months, p = 0.041, 1‑year survival 29 versus 10%). Adverse events (AE) were evaluated for both subgroups. For the FSRT group no toxicity ≥ grade 4 occurred. For the CIRT subgroup no grade 5 AE occurred, but 1 patient developed a grade 4 radionecrosis. We encountered 4 grade 3 toxicities. One patient developed a zoster at the trunk, 2 progressed in their paresis, and 1 featured progressive dysesthesia. CONCLUSION In conclusion, carbon ion treatment is a safe and feasible treatment option for recurrent glioblastoma. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and two different dose levels for CIRT or FSRT, the improved outcome in CIRT reirradiation might be an effect of higher biological impact from carbon ions or a simple dose-escalation effect. This hypothesis needs prospective testing in larger patient cohorts. A prospective phase III randomized trial is in preparation at our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Lautenschlaeger
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany.
| | - R Dumke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Schymalla
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - H Hauswald
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- RNS Gemeinschaftspraxis, St. Josefs-Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Carl
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Stein
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - U Keber
- Institut für Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - A Jensen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - R Engenhart-Cabillic
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - F Eberle
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Valganciclovir as Add-on to Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14081958. [PMID: 35454863 PMCID: PMC9030820 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with glioblastoma have a dismal prognosis. The major challenge with this disease is that it recurs despite aggressive first-line therapy and rapidly becomes therapy resistant. Cytomegalovirus has been found in most glioblastoma tumors and may contribute to tumor aggressiveness. Antiviral therapy may thus represent a novel therapeutic strategy and has shown promising results in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. We performed a retrospective analysis of survival data of 29 patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving the antiviral drug valganciclovir as an add-on to second-line therapy and of 109 contemporary controls treated at our institution. Valganciclovir was well tolerated and seemed to improve survival after tumor recurrence in patients with recurrent disease both in re-operated and non-re-operated patients and in patients with unmethylated and methylated MGMT promoter status. Prospective controlled clinical studies on patients with recurrent glioblastoma are warranted to evaluate if valganciclovir treatment offers a novel therapeutic option. Abstract Glioblastoma invariably recurs despite aggressive and multimodal first-line treatment and no standardized second-line therapy exists. We previously reported that treatment with the antiviral drug valganciclovir as an add-on to standard therapy significantly prolonged overall survival in 102 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma compared to contemporary controls. Here we present the results of retrospective survival analyses including patients with glioblastoma that initiated valganciclovir therapy after recurrence. Twenty-nine patients with recurrent glioblastoma received valganciclovir as an add-on to second-line therapy at Karolinska University Hospital. Contemporary controls were 109 patients with glioblastoma who received similar second-line therapy at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed survival data of these patients. Patients with recurrent glioblastoma who received valganciclovir had longer median overall survival after recurrence than controls (12.1 vs. 7.4 months, respectively, p = 0.0028). The drug was well tolerated. Both patients who underwent re-operation and patients that were not re-operated after recurrence benefitted significantly from valganciclovir therapy. Valganciclovir prolonged survival after recurrence both in patients with an unmethylated and methylated MGMT promoter gene. Valganciclovir was safe to use and prolonged median survival after recurrence for patients with recurrent glioblastoma, re-operated or not after recurrence, and with methylated or unmethylated MGMT promoter gene.
Collapse
|
13
|
Diehl C, Rosenkranz E, Mißlbeck M, Schwendner M, Sollmann N, Ille S, Meyer B, Combs S, Bernhardt D, Krieg S. nTMS-derived DTI-based motor fiber tracking in radiotherapy treatment planning of high-grade gliomas for avoidance of motor structures. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:189-197. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
14
|
Re-irradiation for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) patients: Results of a single arm prospective phase 2 study. Radiother Oncol 2022; 167:89-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
15
|
Cebula H, Garnon J, Todeschi J, Noel G, Lhermitte B, Mallereau CH, Chibbaro S, Burckel H, Schott R, de Mathelin M, Gangi A, Proust F. Interventional magnetic-resonance-guided cryotherapy combined with microsurgery for recurrent glioblastoma: An innovative treatment? Neurochirurgie 2021; 68:267-272. [PMID: 34906554 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma invariably recurs after primary Stupp tumor therapy and portends a poor prognosis. Cryoablation is a well-established treatment strategy for extra-cranial tumors. The safety and efficacy of interventional MR-guided cryoablation (iMRgC) has not been explored in recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS A retrospective analysis of data collected over a period of 24 months was performed. The inclusion criteria were: (I) recurrent glioblastoma despite Stupp protocol; (II) MRI followed by histological confirmation of recurrent glioblastoma; (III) location allowing iMRgC followed by microsurgical resection; and (IV) patient's consent. The primary objective was to assess feasibility in terms of complications. The secondary objective was to analyze progression-free survival (PFS), post-iMRgC survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The study included 6 patients, with a mean age of 67±7.6 years [range, 54-70 years]. No major complications were observed. Median PFS was 7.5 months [IQR 3.75-9.75] and 6-month PFS was 50%. Median post-iMRgC survival was 9 months [IQR 7.5-15.25] and 6-month post-iMRgC survival was 80%. Median OS was 22.5 months [IQR 21.75-30]. CONCLUSION iMRgC for recurrent glioblastoma demonstrated a good safety profile, with no major complications. Our data suggest improved PFS and OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER No. IRB00011687 retrospectively registred on July 7th 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Cebula
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - J Garnon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - J Todeschi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noel
- Department of Radiation Therapy, ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - B Lhermitte
- Department of Histology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - C-H Mallereau
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - S Chibbaro
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - H Burckel
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - R Schott
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - A Gangi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - F Proust
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
García-Cabezas S, Rivin del Campo E, Solivera-Vela J, Palacios-Eito A. Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed? World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:767-786. [PMID: 34631441 PMCID: PMC8479348 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia García-Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | | | - Juan Solivera-Vela
- Department of Neurosurgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Amalia Palacios-Eito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Temozolomide Induces the Acquisition of Invasive Phenotype by O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) + Glioblastoma Cells in a Snail-1/Cx43-Dependent Manner. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22084150. [PMID: 33923767 PMCID: PMC8073161 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) recurrences after temozolomide (TMZ) treatment result from the expansion of drug-resistant and potentially invasive GBM cells. This process is facilitated by O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT), which counteracts alkylating TMZ activity. We traced the expansion of invasive cell lineages under persistent chemotherapeutic stress in MGMTlow (U87) and MGMThigh (T98G) GBM populations to look into the mechanisms of TMZ-induced microevolution of GBM invasiveness. TMZ treatment induced short-term, pro-invasive phenotypic shifts of U87 cells, in the absence of Snail-1 activation. They were illustrated by a transient induction of their motility and followed by the hypertrophy and the signs of senescence in scarce U87 sub-populations that survived long-term TMZ stress. In turn, MGMThigh T98G cells reacted to the long-term TMZ treatment with the permanent induction of invasiveness. Ectopic Snail-1 down-regulation attenuated this effect, whereas its up-regulation augmented T98G invasiveness. MGMTlow and MGMThigh cells both reacted to the long-term TMZ stress with the induction of Cx43 expression. However, only in MGMThigh T98G populations, Cx43 was directly involved in the induction of invasiveness, as manifested by the induction of T98G invasiveness after ectopic Cx43 up-regulation and by the opposite effect after Cx43 down-regulation. Collectively, Snail-1/Cx43-dependent signaling participates in the long-term TMZ-induced microevolution of the invasive GBM front. High MGMT activity remains a prerequisite for this process, even though MGMT-related GBM chemoresistance is not necessary for its initiation.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zheng L, Zhou ZR, Shi M, Chen H, Yu QQ, Yang Y, Liu L, Zhang L, Guo Y, Zhou X, Li C, Wei Q. Nomograms for predicting progression-free survival and overall survival after surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:571. [PMID: 33987269 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. The prognosis of GBM patients is poor. Even with active standard treatment, the median overall survival is only 14.6 months. It is therefore critical to ascertain recurrence and search for factors that influence the prognosis of GBM. This study aimed to screen the variables related to the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of GBM patients undergoing surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, as well as propose a nomogram for individual risk prediction based on preoperative imaging parameters and clinicopathological variables readily available in clinical practice. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 114 consecutive patients with GBM who underwent surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 1st, 2015, to June 1st, 2018. Twenty-four preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters were extracted manually from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Clinicopathological factors were extracted from the electronic medical record system (EMRS). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and Cox regression were used for feature selection and model prediction, respectively. The models were presented using nomograms, which were applied to identify the risk of recurrence and survival according to the score. The performance of the nomograms to predict PFS and OS was tested with C-statistics, calibration plots, and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results The results revealed that sex, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), O6-methylglucamine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein expression, number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles with temozolomide (TMZ), and the MRI signature effectively predicted PFS; and sex, KPS, extent of surgery, number of TMZ cycles, and MRI signature effectively predicted OS. The nomogram revealed good discriminative ability (C-statistics: 0.81 for PFS and 0.79 for OS). In the nomogram of PFS, patients with a score greater than 122 were considered to have a high risk of recurrence. In the nomogram of OS, the cutoff score were 115 and 145, and then patients were classified as low, medium, and high risk. Conclusions In conclusion, our nomograms can effectively predict the risk of recurrence and survival of GBM patients and thus can be a good guide for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Cancer Hospital, Taizhou, China
| | - Zhi-Rui Zhou
- Radiation Oncology Center, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minghan Shi
- Département de l'éducation aux adultes, Cégep Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Brossard, QC, Canada
| | - Haiyan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qian-Qian Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lihong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yinglu Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Minniti G, Niyazi M, Alongi F, Navarria P, Belka C. Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:36. [PMID: 33602305 PMCID: PMC7890828 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01767-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite aggressive management consisting of maximal safe surgical resection followed by external beam radiation therapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, approximately 90% of WHO grade IV gliomas (glioblastomas, GBM) will recur locally within 2 years. For patients with recurrent GBM, no standard of care exists. Thanks to the continuous improvement in radiation science and technology, reirradiation has emerged as feasible approach for patients with brain tumors. Using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), either hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated schedules, several studies have suggested survival benefits following reirradiation of patients with recurrent GBM; however, there are still questions to be answered about the efficacy and toxicity associated with a second course of radiation. We provide a clinical overview on current status and recent advances in reirradiation of GBM, addressing relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate patient selection and radiation technique, optimal dose fractionation, reirradiation tolerance of the brain and the risk of radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico le Scotte, 53100, Siena, Italy. .,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, VR, Italy
| | - Piera Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gupta T, Maitre M, Maitre P, Goda JS, Krishnatry R, Chatterjee A, Moiyadi A, Shetty P, Epari S, Sahay A, Patil V, Jalali R. High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting? Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1358-1367. [PMID: 33528810 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02526-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors of salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) in recurrent/progressive glioma. METHODS Medical records of patients treated with high-dose re-RT as part of multi-modality salvage therapy for recurrence/progression of adult diffuse glioma from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS A total of 111 patients developing recurrent/progressive high-grade glioma after adequate upfront treatment at initial diagnosis were included. The first course of radiotherapy (RT) had been delivered to a median dose of 59.4 Gy with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 54-60 Gy. Median time to recurrence/progression was 4.3 years (IQR = 2.3-7.4 years) while the median time to re-RT was 4.8 years (IQR = 3.6-7.9 years). Re-RT was delivered with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using 1.8 Gy/fraction to a median dose of 54 Gy (IQR = 50.4-55.8 Gy) for a cumulative median equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) of 104.3 Gy (IQR = 102.6-109.4 Gy). At a median follow-up of 14 months after re-RT, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of post-re-RT progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 42.8 and 61.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified histological grade at recurrence/progression; histological subtype; disease-free interval (DFI) and time interval between both courses of RT; performance status at re-RT; dose at re-RT and cumulative EQD2; isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation; and O6-methyl-guanine DNA methyl transferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation as significant prognostic factors. Preserved performance status, longer DFI, prolonged time interval between both courses of RT, and presence of IDH mutation were associated with significantly improved PFS on multi-variate analysis. However, only performance status retained independent prognostic significance for OS on multi-variate analysis. Post-treatment changes were seen in 33 (30%) patients on follow-up imaging, with higher cumulative dose (EQD2 ≥ 104.3 Gy) being associated with increased risk of post-re-RT pseudo-progression. CONCLUSION This clinical audit reports encouraging survival outcomes and identifies key prognostic factors associated with high-dose salvage re-RT in recurrent/progressive glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
| | - M Maitre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - P Maitre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - J S Goda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - R Krishnatry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - A Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - A Moiyadi
- Department of Neuro-Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - P Shetty
- Department of Neuro-Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - S Epari
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - A Sahay
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - V Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - R Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wahner HCW, Träger M, Bender K, Schweizer L, Onken J, Senger C, Ehret F, Budach V, Kaul D. Predicting survival in anaplastic astrocytoma patients in a single-center cohort of 108 patients. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:282. [PMID: 33334378 PMCID: PMC7745461 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01728-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines for the treatment of anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) recommend maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite this multimodal treatment approach, patients have a limited life expectancy. In the present study, we identified variables associated with overall survival (OS) and constructed a model score to predict the OS of patients with AA at the time of their primary diagnosis. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients with newly diagnosed AA. The patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed for their impact on OS. Variables significantly associated with OS on multivariable analysis were included in our score. The final algorithm was based on the 36-month survival rates corresponding to each characteristic. RESULTS On univariate analysis, age, Karnofsky performance status, isocitrate dehydrogenase status, and extent of resection were significantly associated with OS. On multivariable analysis all four variables remained significant and were consequently incorporated in the score. The total score ranges from 20 to 33 points. We designated three prognostic groups: A (20-25), B (26-29), and C (30-33 points) with 36-month OS rates of 23%, 71%, and 100%, respectively. The OS rate at 5 years was 8% in group A, 61% in group B and 88% in group C. CONCLUSIONS Our model score predicts the OS of patients newly diagnosed with AA and distinguishes patients with a poor survival prognosis from those with a greater life expectancy. Independent and prospective validation is needed. The upcoming changes of the WHO classification of brain tumors as well as the practice changing results from the CATNON trial will most likely require adaption of the score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena C W Wahner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Malte Träger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katja Bender
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonille Schweizer
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Scoccianti S, Perna M, Olmetto E, Delli Paoli C, Terziani F, Ciccone LP, Detti B, Greto D, Simontacchi G, Grassi R, Scoccimarro E, Bonomo P, Mangoni M, Desideri I, Di Cataldo V, Vernaleone M, Casati M, Pallotta S, Livi L. Local treatment for relapsing glioblastoma: A decision-making tree for choosing between reirradiation and second surgery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103184. [PMID: 33307416 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In case of circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma (rec-GBM), a second surgery (Re-S) and reirradiation (Re-RT) are local strategies to consider. The aim is to provide an algorithm to use in the daily clinical practice. The first step is to consider the life expectancy in order to establish whether the patient should be a candidate for active treatment. In case of a relatively good life expectancy (>3 months) and a confirmed circumscribed disease(i.e. without multiple lesions that are in different lobes/hemispheres), the next step is the assessment of the prognostic factors for local treatments. Based on the existing prognostic score systems, patients who should be excluded from local treatments may be identified; based on the validated prognostic factors, one or the other local treatment may be preferred. The last point is the estimation of expected toxicity, considering patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors impacting on side effects. Lastly, patients with very good prognostic factors may be considered for receiving a combined treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Scoccianti
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Marco Perna
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Emanuela Olmetto
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Camilla Delli Paoli
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Terziani
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Pia Ciccone
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Erika Scoccimarro
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Mangoni
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Vernaleone
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Casati
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Pallotta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dobi Á, Darázs B, Fodor E, Cserháti A, Együd Z, Maráz A, László S, Dodd L, Reisz Z, Barzó P, Oláh J, Hideghéty K. Low Fraction Size Re-irradiation for Large Volume Recurrence of Glial Tumours. Pathol Oncol Res 2020; 26:2651-2658. [PMID: 32648211 PMCID: PMC7471107 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-020-00868-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation (re-RT) in patients with advanced local relapses of glial tumours and to define the factors influencing the result of the hyper-fractionated external beam therapy on progression after primary management. We have analysed the data of 55 patients with brain tumours (GBM: 28) on progression, who were re-irradiated between January 2007 and December 2018. The mean volume of the recurrent tumour was 118 cm3, and the mean planning target volume (PTV) was 316 cm3, to which 32 Gy was delivered in 20 fractions at least 7.7 months after the first radiotherapy, using 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The median overall survival (mOS) from the re-RT was 8.4 months, and the 6-month and the 12-month OS rate was 64% and 31%, respectively. The most important factors by univariate analysis, which significantly improved the outcome of re-RT were the longer time interval between the diagnosis and second radiotherapy (p = 0.029), the lower histology grade (p = 0.034), volume of the recurrent tumour (p = 0.006) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.009) at the re-irradiation. Our low fraction size re-irradiation ≥ 8 months after the first radiotherapy proved to be safe and beneficial for patients with large volume recurrent glial tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ágnes Dobi
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
| | - Barbara Darázs
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Emese Fodor
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Adrienne Cserháti
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Zsófia Együd
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Anikó Maráz
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Szilvia László
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Leopold Dodd
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Zita Reisz
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Állomás utca 1, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - Pál Barzó
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Szeged, Semmelweis utca 6, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
| | - Judit Oláh
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Katalin Hideghéty
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kaul D, Pudlitz V, Böhmer D, Wust P, Budach V, Grün A. Reirradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 198 Patients Based on the Charité Data Set. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:959-964. [PMID: 33083659 PMCID: PMC7557122 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is no standard of care for recurrent high-grade glioma. Treatment strategies include reresection, reirradiation, systemic agents, intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles ("nanotherapy"), and tumor treating fields. Only a small number of patients are eligible for reresection, and because many patients receive a full course of radiation therapy, there is fear of reirradiation-induced morbidity. Modern radiation techniques have resulted in greater acceptance of reirradiation. In this work we retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone reirradiation of high-grade glioma at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Methods and Materials All patients treated with reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma in our department from January 1997 to February 2014 were analyzed in this study. In total, 198 patients were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival after recurrence. Results One hundred ninety-eight patients were identified. Median time from first radiation therapy to reirradiation was 14 months. Median follow-up from the first day of reirradiation to last contact or death was 7 months. Median overall survival after relapse was 7 months for the overall cohort. For glioblastoma, median overall survival after relapse was 6 months and for grade 3 gliomas 14 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 toxicity was observed in 5.1% patients and grade 4 toxicity in 2.5%. No patient developed grade 5 toxicity. The likelihood of developing severe toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or 4) was not significantly higher in the group of patients who received reirradiation in the first 14 months after initial radiation therapy. Patients who received a higher biologically effective dose to the tumor also did not have a significantly higher rate of severe acute toxicity. Conclusions The prognosis of recurrent high-grade glioma remains dismal. Reirradiation is often tolerable even after early recurrence (<14 months) and with higher doses (eg, 49.4 Gy/3.8 Gy) in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vera Pudlitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pudełek M, Król K, Catapano J, Wróbel T, Czyż J, Ryszawy D. Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) Augments the Invasive Potential of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Cells via the Activation of Collaborative EGFR/ROS-Dependent Signaling. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21103605. [PMID: 32443749 PMCID: PMC7279139 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21103605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Abnormal secretion of epidermal growth factor (EGF) by non-neuronal cells (e.g., glioma-associated microglia) establishes a feedback loop between glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) invasion and a functional disruption of brain tissue. Considering the postulated significance of this vicious circle for GBM progression, we scrutinized mechanisms of EGF-dependent pro-invasive signaling in terms of its interrelations with energy metabolism and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. The effects of EGF on the invasiveness of human glioblastoma T98G cells were estimated using time-lapse video microscopy, immunocytochemistry, cell cycle assay, immunoblot analyses, and Transwell® assay. These techniques were followed by quantification of the effect of EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) and ROS inhibitors on the EGF-induced T98G invasiveness and intracellular ROS, ATP, and lactate levels and mitochondrial metabolism. The EGF remarkably augmented the proliferation and motility of the T98G cells. Responses of these cells were accompanied by cellular rear–front polarization, translocation of vinculin to the leading lamellae, and increased promptness of penetration of micropore barriers. Erlotinib (the EGFR inhibitor) significantly attenuated the EGF-induced T98G invasiveness and metabolic reprogramming of the T98G cells, otherwise illustrated by the increased mitochondrial activity, glycolysis, and ROS production in the EGF-treated cells. In turn, ROS inhibition by N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) had no effect on T98G morphology, but considerably attenuated EGF-induced cell motility. Our data confirmed the EGFR/ROS-dependent pro-neoplastic and pro-invasive activity of EGF in human GBM. These EGF effects may depend on metabolic reprogramming of GBM cells and are executed by alternative ROS-dependent/-independent pathways. The EGF may thus preserve bioenergetic homeostasis of GBM cells in hypoxic regions of brain tissue.
Collapse
|
26
|
Straube C, Kessel KA, Antoni S, Gempt J, Meyer B, Schlegel J, Schmidt-Graf F, Combs SE. A balanced score to predict survival of elderly patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:97. [PMID: 32375830 PMCID: PMC7201994 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01549-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past years, several treatment regimens have been recommended for elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM), ranging from ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) over monochemotherapy (ChT) to combined radiochemotherapy (RChT). The current guidelines recommend active treatment in elderly patients in cases with a KPS of at least 60%. We established a score for selecting patients with a very poor prognosis from patients with a better prognosis. METHODS One hundred eighty one patients ≥65 years old, histologically diagnosed with GBM, were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical characteristics were analysed for their impact on the overall survival (OS). Factors which were significant in univariate analysis (log-rank test, p < 0.05) were included in a multi-variate model (multi-variate Cox regression analysis, MVA). The 9-month OS for the significant factors after MVA (p < 0.05) was included in a prognostic score. Score sums with a median OS of < and > 6 months were summarized as Group A and B, respectively. RESULTS Age, KPS, MGMT status, the extent of resection, aphasia after surgery and motor dysfunction after surgery were significantly associated with OS on univariate analysis (p < 0.05). On MVA age (p 0.002), MGMT promotor methylation (p 0.013) and Karnofsky performance status (p 0.005) remained significant and were included in the score. Patients were divided into two groups, group A (median OS of 2.7 months) and group B (median OS of 7.8 months). The score was of prognostic significance, independent of the adjuvant treatment regimen. CONCLUSIONS The score distinguishes patients with a poor prognosis from patients with a better prognosis. Its inclusion in future retrospective or prospective trials could help enhance the comparability of results. Before its employment on a routine basis, external validation is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
- Deutsches Konsortium für translationale Krebsforschung (dktk), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juergen Schlegel
- Department of Neuropathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für translationale Krebsforschung (dktk), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Strahlenmedizin (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rudà R, Angileri FF, Ius T, Silvani A, Sarubbo S, Solari A, Castellano A, Falini A, Pollo B, Del Basso De Caro M, Papagno C, Minniti G, De Paula U, Navarria P, Nicolato A, Salmaggi A, Pace A, Fabi A, Caffo M, Lombardi G, Carapella CM, Spena G, Iacoangeli M, Fontanella M, Germanò AF, Olivi A, Bello L, Esposito V, Skrap M, Soffietti R. Italian consensus and recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas. An intersociety (SINch/AINO/SIN) document. J Neurosurg Sci 2020; 64:313-334. [PMID: 32347684 DOI: 10.23736/s0390-5616.20.04982-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In 2018, the SINch (Italian Society of Neurosurgery) Neuro-Oncology Section, AINO (Italian Association of Neuro-Oncology) and SIN (Italian Association of Neurology) Neuro-Oncology Section formed a collaborative Task Force to look at the diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). The Task Force included neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, a neuropsychologist and a methodologist. For operational purposes, the Task Force was divided into five Working Groups: diagnosis, surgical treatment, adjuvant treatments, supportive therapies, and follow-up. The resulting guidance document is based on the available evidence and provides recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of LGG patients, considering all aspects of patient care along their disease trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Filippo F Angileri
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy -
| | - Tamara Ius
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Silvani
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Sarubbo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Structural and Functional Connectivity Lab Project, "S. Chiara" Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Alessandra Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Castellano
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Falini
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Bianca Pollo
- Section of Oncologic Neuropathology, Division of Neurology V - Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Costanza Papagno
- Center of Neurocognitive Rehabilitation (CeRiN), Interdepartmental Center of Mind/Brain, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.,Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Ugo De Paula
- Unit of Radiotherapy, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Nicolato
- Unit of Stereotaxic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Salmaggi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy
| | - Andrea Pace
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Caffo
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Unit of Oncology 1, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Giannantonio Spena
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy
| | - Maurizio Iacoangeli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Marche Polytechnic University, Umberto I General University Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Fontanella
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonino F Germanò
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alessandro Olivi
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Unit of Oncologic Neurosurgery, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Esposito
- Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Giampaolo Cantore Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy
| | - Miran Skrap
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chan J, Jayamanne D, Wheeler H, Khasraw M, Wong M, Kastelan M, Guo L, Back M. The role of large volume re-irradiation with Bevacizumab in chemorefractory high grade glioma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 22:33-39. [PMID: 32195378 PMCID: PMC7075764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Large volume reRT is a viable treatment for refractory recurrent high-grade glioma. Bevacizumab facilitates large volume reRT by reducing the risk of CNS radionecrosis. Patient selection for reRT needs more work but should be guided by performance status.
Background and purpose Current practice in re-irradiation (reRT) of previously treated high-grade gliomas (HGG) has generally been limited to small volume reRT with stereotactic procedures. Less evidence exists for large volume reRT involving treatment volumes equivalent to that used at initial diagnosis. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of large volume reRT delivered in combination with Bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with recurrent chemorefractory HGG. Methods and materials Patients with HGG managed with reRT were entered prospectively into a database. Clinicopathological features were recorded including timing of reRT, use of BEV and Dosimetric data. Median survival following reRT was the primary endpoint and association with clinicopathological factors was assessed with cox regression models. Results Sixty seven patients in total were managed with reRT, 51 patients had glioblastoma and 16 had anaplastic glioma. The median PTV was 145.3 cm3. Median OS post reRT was 7.8 months (95% CI 6.3–9.2 months) in the total cohort and 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.6–8.3 months) for GBM patients. In multivariate analysis of the whole cohort, IDH1 mutation status (p = 0.041) and ECOG status prior to reRT (<0.001) were significantly associated with OS. In terms of safety and toxicity, the majority of patients (66.5%) were ECOG 0–2 three months after treatment. In total, four episodes of suspected radiation necrosis occurred, all in patients treated without upfront BEV. Conclusion Large volume reRT with bevacizumab is a feasible late salvage option in patients with recurrent HGG and offers meaningful prolongation of survival with low toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Chan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dasantha Jayamanne
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Helen Wheeler
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew Wong
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia
| | - Marina Kastelan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lesley Guo
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia.,Genesis Cancer Care, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Baehr A, Trog D, Oertel M, Welsch S, Kröger K, Grauer O, Haverkamp U, Eich HT. Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a critical comparison of different concepts. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:457-464. [PMID: 32016497 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01585-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Purpose of this study was to investigate outcome and toxicity of re-irradiation for recurrent primary glioblastoma (rGBM). We evaluated a group of patients with rGBM and identical primary treatment comprising adjuvant radiotherapy (30 × 2 Gy) with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS In this retrospective study of 46 patients, all received adjuvant or definitive normofractionated radiotherapy to a pretreated area, some with concurrent chemotherapy. Impact of different clinical, histological, or epidemiological factors on survival and radiation toxicity was reviewed. RESULTS Of 46 patients, 40 completed the intended therapy. Overall survival (OS) was 20 months (range 6-72 months). Overall survival and progression-free survival after re-irradiation (OS2 and PFS2) were 9.5 and 3.4 months (range 2-40 and 0.7-44 months). Simultaneous systemic therapy improved PFS2 and OS2 (4.3 vs. 2.0, p < 0.001 and 12 vs. 4 months, p = 0.13, respectively). Therapy with TMZ or bevacizumab improved PFS2 vs. nitrosureas (6.6 vs. 2.9, p = 0.03 and 5.1 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.035, respectively). TMZ also improved PFS2 and OS2 vs. all other systemic therapies (6.6 vs. 4, p < 0.001 and 17 vs. 10 months, p = 0.1). In a subgroup analysis for patients with methylation of the MGMT promoter, doses of >36 Gy as well as TMZ vs. no systemic therapy improved PFS2 (p = 0.045 and p = 0.03, respectively). 27.5% of all patients had no acute toxicity. Three patients with acute and four patients with late grade 3 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION Normofractionated radiotherapy is a feasible option for rGBM with a good toxicity profile. Simultaneously applied systemic therapy was associated with improved outcome. For MGMT promoter-methylated histology, higher radiation doses improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Baehr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
| | - D Trog
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - S Welsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - K Kröger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - O Grauer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - U Haverkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - H T Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kessel KA, Combs SE. Digital biomarkers: Importance of patient stratification for re-irradiation of glioma patients - Review of latest developments regarding scoring assessment. Phys Med 2019; 67:20-26. [PMID: 31622876 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review scoring assessments in re-irradiation of high-grade glioma (HGG) patients and how to use scoring for patient stratification. The next aim was to investigate the different approaches employed by the scoring systems and the way they can be applied to build homogeneous patient groups for a reliable prognosis. METHODS We searched the Medline/Pubmed and Web of science databases for relevant articles regarding scores for re-irradiation of recurrent HGG. All references were divided into the following groups: novel score establishment (n = 5), score validation (n = 6), not relevant to this evaluation (n = 26). RESULTS We identified five scoring systems. Two are modifications of an already existing score. Calculations differ immensely from easy point addition to a more complex formula with including three up to 10 individual parameters. Six validation articles were found for three of the scores; one was validated four times. Two scores were never validated. CONCLUSION For recurrent HGG, the clinical situation remains demanding. Due to the heterogeneity of data at re-irradiation, patient stratification is important. Several scoring systems have been developed to predict prognosis. As a digital biomarker, scores are of high value regarding quick patient assessment and therapy decision making. For the next generation of digital biomarkers, easy calculation, and inclusion of easily available parameters are crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany.
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stavrinou P, Kalyvas A, Grau S, Hamisch C, Galldiks N, Katsigiannis S, Kabbasch C, Timmer M, Goldbrunner R, Stranjalis G. Survival effects of a strategy favoring second-line multimodal treatment compared to supportive care in glioblastoma patients at first progression. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:1136-1141. [PMID: 30544353 DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.jns18228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Data on the survival effects of supportive care compared to second-line multimodal treatment for glioblastoma progression are scarce. Thus, the authors assessed survival in two population-based, similar cohorts from two European university hospitals with different treatment strategies at first progression. METHODS The authors retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated at two neurooncological centers. After diagnosis, patients from both centers received identical treatments, but at tumor progression each center used a different approach. In the majority of cases, at center A (Greece), supportive care or a single therapeutic modality was offered at progression, whereas center B (Germany) provided multimodal second-line therapy. The main outcome measure was survival after progression (SaP). The influence of the treatment strategy on SaP was assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS One hundred three patients from center A and 156 from center B were included. Tumor progression was observed in 86 patients (center A) and 136 patients (center B). At center A, 53 patients (72.6%) received supportive care alone, while at center B, 91 patients (80.5%) received second-line treatment. Progression-free survival at both centers was similar (9.4 months [center A] vs 9.0 months [center B]; p = 0.97), but SaP was significantly improved in the patients treated with multimodal second-line therapy at center B (7 months, 95% CI 5.3-8.7 months) compared to those treated with supportive care or a single therapeutic modality at center A (4.5 months, 95% CI 3.5-5.5 months; p = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, the treatment center was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.17-2.15; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Treatment strategy favoring multimodal second-line treatment over minimal treatment or supportive care at glioblastoma progression is associated with significantly better overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aristotelis Kalyvas
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Evangelismos Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - Stefan Grau
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Christina Hamisch
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- 3Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
- 4Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Germany
- 5Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany; and
| | | | | | - Marco Timmer
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - George Stranjalis
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Evangelismos Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sharma M, Schroeder JL, Elson P, Meola A, Barnett GH, Vogelbaum MA, Suh JH, Chao ST, Mohammadi AM, Stevens GHJ, Murphy ES, Angelov L. Outcomes and prognostic stratification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with salvage stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:489-499. [PMID: 30485180 DOI: 10.3171/2018.4.jns172909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant form of astrocytoma. The average survival is 6-10 months in patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM). In this study, the authors evaluated the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with rGBMs. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of their brain tumor database (1997-2016). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after salvage SRS were the primary endpoints evaluated. Response to SRS was assessed using volumetric MR images. RESULTS Fifty-three patients with rGBM underwent salvage SRS targeting 75 lesions. The median tumor diameter and volume were 2.55 cm and 3.80 cm3, respectively. The median prescription dose was 18 Gy (range 12-24 Gy) and the homogeneity index was 1.90 (range 1.11-2.02). The median OS after salvage SRS was estimated to be 11.0 months (95% CI 7.1-12.2) and the median PFS after salvage SRS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.7-5.0). A Karnofsky Performance Scale score ≥ 80 was independently associated with longer OS, while small tumor volume (< 15 cm3) and less homogeneous treatment plans (homogeneity index > 1.75) were both independently associated with longer OS (p = 0.007 and 0.03) and PFS (p = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). Based on these factors, 2 prognostic groups were identified for PFS (5.4 vs 3.2 months), while 3 were identified for OS (median OS of 15.2 vs 10.5 vs 5.2 months). CONCLUSIONS SRS is associated with longer OS and/or PFS in patients with good performance status, small-volume tumor recurrences, and heterogeneous treatment plans. The authors propose a prognostic model to identify a cohort of rGBM patients who may benefit from SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur Sharma
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Jason L Schroeder
- 2Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo
| | - Paul Elson
- 3Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic; and
| | - Antonio Meola
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Gene H Barnett
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - John H Suh
- 4The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel T Chao
- 4The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Glen H J Stevens
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Erin S Murphy
- 4The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Straube C, Kessel KA, Zimmer C, Schmidt-Graf F, Schlegel J, Gempt J, Meyer B, Combs SE. A Second Course of Radiotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Clinical Data on Re-irradiation, Prognostic Factors, and Usefulness of Digital Biomarkers. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2019; 20:71. [PMID: 31324990 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0673-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The treatment of malignant gliomas has undergone a significant intensification during the past decade, and the interdisciplinary treatment team has learned that all treatment opportunities, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT), also have a central role in recurrent gliomas. Throughout the decades, re-irradiation (re-RT) has achieved a prominent place in the treatment of recurrent gliomas. A solid body of evidence supports the safety and efficacy of re-RT, especially when modern techniques are used, and justifies the early use of this regimen, especially in the case when macroscopic disease is present. Additionally, a second adjuvant re-RT to the resection cavity is currently being investigated by several investigators and seems to offer promising results. Although advanced RT technologies, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have become available in many centers, re-RT should continue to be kept in experienced hands so that they can select the optimal regimen, the ideal treatment volume, and the appropriate techniques from their tool-boxes. Concomitant or adjuvant use of systemic treatment options should also strongly be taken into consideration, especially because temozolomide (TMZ), cyclohexyl-nitroso-urea (CCNU), and bevacizumab have shown a good safety profile; they should be considered, if available. Nonetheless, the selection of patients for re-RT remains crucial. Single factors, such as patient age or the progression-free interval (PFI), fall too short. Therefore, powerful prognostic scores have been generated and validated, and these scores should be used for patient selection and counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Schlegel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Efficacy and Safety of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2019; 127:176-185. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
35
|
Chapman CH, Hara JH, Molinaro AM, Clarke JL, Oberheim Bush NA, Taylor JW, Butowski NA, Chang SM, Fogh SE, Sneed PK, Nakamura JL, Raleigh DR, Braunstein SE. Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade glioma and development of prognostic scores for progression and survival. Neurooncol Pract 2019; 6:364-374. [PMID: 31555451 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Optimal techniques and patient selection for salvage reirradiation of high-grade glioma (HGG) are unclear. In this study, we identify prognostic factors for freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) after reirradiation, risk factors for high-grade toxicity, and validate clinical prognostic scores. Methods A total of 116 patients evaluated between 2000 and 2018 received reirradiation for HGG (99 WHO grade IV, 17 WHO grade III). Median time to first progression after initial therapy was 10.6 months. Salvage therapies before reirradiation included surgery (31%) and systemic therapy (41%). Sixty-five patients (56%) received single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as reirradiation. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was 47.25 Gy, and the median planning target volume (PTV) was 4.8 cc for SRS and 95.0 cc for non-SRS treatments. Systemic therapy was given concurrently to 52% and adjuvantly to 74% of patients. Results Median FFP was 4.9 months, and median OS was 11.0 months. Significant multivariable prognostic factors for FFP were performance status, time to initial progression, and BED; for OS they were age, time to initial progression, and PTV volume at recurrence. High-grade toxicity was correlated to PTV size at recurrence. Three-level prognostic scores were generated for FFP and OS, with cross-validated receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.640 and 0.687, respectively. Conclusions Clinical variables at the time of reirradiation for HGG can be used to prognosticate FFP and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jared H Hara
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Jennifer L Clarke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Jennie W Taylor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Nicholas A Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Shannon E Fogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Penny K Sneed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Jean L Nakamura
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kim IH. Appraisal of re-irradiation for the recurrent glioblastoma in the era of MGMT promotor methylation. Radiat Oncol J 2019; 37:1-12. [PMID: 30947475 PMCID: PMC6453809 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2019.00171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite recent innovation in treatment techniques and subsequently improved outcomes, the majority of glioblastoma (GBL) have relapses, especially in locoregional areas. Local re-irradiation (re-RT) has been established as a feasible option for recurrent GBL of all ages with safety, tolerability, and effectiveness both in survival and quality of life regardless of fractionation schedule. To keep adverse effects under acceptable range, cumulative dose limit in equivalent dose at 2 Gy fractions by the linear-quadratic model at α/β = 2 for normal brain tissue (EQD2) with narrow margin should be observed and single/hypofractionated re-RT should be undertaken very carefully to recurrent tumor with large volume or adjacent to the brainstem. Promising outcome of re-operation (re-Op) plus re-RT (re-Op/RT) need to be validated and result from re-RT with temozolomide/bevacizumab (TMZ/BV) or new strategy is expected. Development of new-concept prognostic scoring or risk group is required to select patients properly and make use of predictive biomarkers such as O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation that influence outcomes of re-RT, re-Op/RT, or re-RT with TMZ/BV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Il Han Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Straube C, Antoni S, Gempt J, Zimmer C, Meyer B, Schlegel J, Schmidt-Graf F, Combs SE. Re-irradiation in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a single institution experience. J Neurooncol 2019; 142:327-335. [PMID: 30659523 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03101-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-Irradiation (Re-RT) is an established treatment option for young patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Multiple reports show a low risk of side-effects as well as a good efficacy resulting in median survival times ranging from 5 to 18 months. Elderly patients, however, are underrepresented in reports about Re-RT. Even in the elderly, with concomitant radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, progression-free survival times now are approaching 6 months or even longer. METHODS We report on 25 consecutive patients with at least 65 years of age treated with Re-RT for recurrent GBM. We analyzed the patient's files for the treatment regimens, side-effects and survival times. Survival times, as well as hazards, were calculated by the Kaplan Meier method as well as Cox-regression method, respectively. RESULTS The median overall survival was 6.9 months, treatment was well tolerated with only minor side effects. Use of systemic treatments as well as the length of the interval between 1st -line radiotherapy and re-irradiation were associated with a favorable prognosis. The latter remained significant after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Re-RT of elderly GBM patients should not be withheld based purely on age since the treatment is safe and results in comparable survival times to younger patients. When counseling elderly patients with recurrent GBM, especially the length of the interval since 1st line radiotherapy should be considered as a prognostic factor and an additional systemic treatment option should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Schlegel
- Institut for Pathology, Department of Neuropathology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Qie S, Yuan L, Shi HY, Zhang X, Li Y. Conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (CFRT) in combination with dose-dense temozolomide (TMZ) in relapsed malignant glioma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e13869. [PMID: 30608405 PMCID: PMC6344191 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000013869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE At present, there is no uniform consensus on the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, especially the re-irradiation dose and temozolomide (TMZ) dose. The literature on the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) by conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (CFRT) is even rarer. PATIENT CONCERNS A 44-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for residual tumor after reoperation. DIAGNOSES Postoperative pathological diagnosis was GBM, WHO grade IV. The brain magnetic resonance imaging re-examination showed abnormal enhancement around the local operative region after resection of the left frontal lobe tumor, and there was presence of residual tumor. INTERVENTIONS The patient was treated with reoperation followed by re-irradiation plus dose-dense TMZ to achieve complete remission. OUTCOMES Complete remission was observed at the end of radiotherapy and at the 1 month follow-up after radiotherapy. LESSONS This study suggests that CFRT plus dose-dense TMZ might be a feasible option for the treatment in relapsed malignant glioma patients with good general condition.
Collapse
|
39
|
Harat M, Dzierzecki S, Dyttus-Cebulok K, Zabek M, Makarewicz R. Impact of stereotactic radiosurgery on first recurrence of glioblastoma. GLIOMA 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/glioma.glioma_16_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
40
|
Peeken JC, Goldberg T, Pyka T, Bernhofer M, Wiestler B, Kessel KA, Tafti PD, Nüsslin F, Braun AE, Zimmer C, Rost B, Combs SE. Combining multimodal imaging and treatment features improves machine learning-based prognostic assessment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Med 2018; 8:128-136. [PMID: 30561851 PMCID: PMC6346243 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For Glioblastoma (GBM), various prognostic nomograms have been proposed. This study aims to evaluate machine learning models to predict patients' overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) on the basis of clinical, pathological, semantic MRI‐based, and FET‐PET/CT‐derived information. Finally, the value of adding treatment features was evaluated. Methods One hundred and eighty‐nine patients were retrospectively analyzed. We assessed clinical, pathological, and treatment information. The VASARI set of semantic imaging features was determined on MRIs. Metabolic information was retained from preoperative FET‐PET/CT images. We generated multiple random survival forest prediction models on a patient training set and performed internal validation. Single feature class models were created including "clinical," "pathological," "MRI‐based," and "FET‐PET/CT‐based" models, as well as combinations. Treatment features were combined with all other features. Results Of all single feature class models, the MRI‐based model had the highest prediction performance on the validation set for OS (C‐index: 0.61 [95% confidence interval: 0.51‐0.72]) and PFS (C‐index: 0.61 [0.50‐0.72]). The combination of all features did increase performance above all single feature class models up to C‐indices of 0.70 (0.59‐0.84) and 0.68 (0.57‐0.78) for OS and PFS, respectively. Adding treatment information further increased prognostic performance up to C‐indices of 0.73 (0.62‐0.84) and 0.71 (0.60‐0.81) on the validation set for OS and PFS, respectively, allowing significant stratification of patient groups for OS. Conclusions MRI‐based features were the most relevant feature class for prognostic assessment. Combining clinical, pathological, and imaging information increased predictive power for OS and PFS. A further increase was achieved by adding treatment features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischem Universität München (TUM), München, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Pyka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Bernhofer
- Department for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität, Munich (TUM), München, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischem Universität München (TUM), München, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Fridtjof Nüsslin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischem Universität München (TUM), München, Germany
| | | | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität, Munich (TUM), München, Germany
| | - Burkhard Rost
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischem Universität München (TUM), München, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2018; 142:79-90. [PMID: 30523605 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03064-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and toxicity of re-irradiation for patients with recurrent GBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched various biomedical databases from 1998 to 2018, for eligible studies where patients were treated with re-irradiation for recurrent GBM. Outcomes of interest were 6 and 12-month overall survival (OS-6, OS-12), 6 and 12-month progression free survival (PFS-6, PFS-12) and serious (Grade 3 +) adverse events (AE). We used the random effects model to pool outcomes across studies and compared pre-defined subgroups using interaction test. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system. RESULTS We found 50 eligible non-comparative studies including 2095 patients. Of these, 42% were of good or fair quality. The pooled results were as follows: OS-6 rate 73% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69-77%), OS-12 rate 36% (95% CI 32-40%), PFS-6 rate 43% (95% CI 35-50%), PFS-12 rate 17% (95% CI 13-20%), and Grade 3 + AE rate 7% (95% CI 4-10%). Subgroup analysis showed that prospective studies reported higher toxicity rates, and studies which utilized brachytherapy to have a longer OS-12. Within the external beam radiotherapy group, there was no dose-response [above or below 36 Gy in 2 Gy equivalent doses (EQD2)]. However, a short fractionation regimen (≤ 5 fractions) seemed to provide superior PFS-6. CONCLUSION The available evidence, albeit mostly level III, suggests that re-irradiation provides encouraging disease control and survival rates. Toxicity was not uniformly reported, but seemed to be low from the included studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to establish the optimal management strategy for recurrent GBM.
Collapse
|
42
|
Navarria P, Minniti G, Clerici E, Tomatis S, Pinzi V, Ciammella P, Galaverni M, Amelio D, Scartoni D, Scoccianti S, Krengli M, Masini L, Draghini L, Maranzano E, Borzillo V, Muto P, Ferrarese F, Fariselli L, Livi L, Pasqualetti F, Fiorentino A, Alongi F, di Monale MB, Magrini S, Scorsetti M. Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO). J Neurooncol 2018; 142:59-67. [PMID: 30515706 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03059-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prognosis of glioma is dismal, and almost all patients relapsed. At recurrence time, several treatment options are considered, but to date there is no a standard of care. The Neurooncology Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) collected clinical data regarding a large series of recurrent glioma patients who underwent re-irradiation (re-RT) in Italy. METHODS Data regarding 300 recurrent glioma patients treated from May 2002 to November 2017, were analyzed. All patients underwent re-RT. Surgical resection, followed by re-RT with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Clinical outcome was evaluated by neurological examination and brain MRI performed, 1 month after radiation therapy and then every 3 months. RESULTS Re-irradiation was performed at a median interval time (IT) of 16 months from the first RT. Surgical resection before re-RT was performed in 19% of patients, concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) in 16.3%, and maintenance chemotherapy in 29%. Total doses ranged from 9 Gy to 52.5 Gy, with a median biological effective dose of 43 Gy. The median, 1, 2 year OS were 9.7 months, 41% and 17.7%. Low grade glioma histology (p ≪ 0.01), IT > 12 months (p = 0.001), KPS > 70 (p = 0.004), younger age (p = 0.001), high total doses delivered (p = 0.04), and combined treatment performed (p = 0.0008) were recorded as conditioning survival. CONCLUSION our data underline re-RT as a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, and a combined ones as a better option for selected patients. The identification of a BED threshold able to obtain a greater benefit on OS, can help in designing future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Pinzi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Neurologico Fondazione "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Marco Galaverni
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Dante Amelio
- Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Translation Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Laura Masini
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Translation Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Lorena Draghini
- Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, "S. Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Borzillo
- UOC Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori -Fondazione "Giovanni Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Muto
- UOC Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori -Fondazione "Giovanni Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Ferrarese
- Radiation Therapy, Ospedale Ca' Foncello di Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Neurologico Fondazione "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Alba Fiorentino
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Patterns of re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas and validation of a prognostic score. Radiother Oncol 2018; 130:156-163. [PMID: 30446315 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE Re-irradiation is a generally accepted method for salvage treatment in patients with recurrent glioma. However, no standard radiation regimen has been defined. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens and to independently externally validate a recently published reirradiation risk score. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with salvage conventionally fractionated (CFRT), hypofractionated (HFRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) between 2007 and 2017 at the University Medical Centers in Utrecht and Groningen. RESULTS Of the 121 patients included, 60 patients (50%) underwent CFRT, 22 (18%) HFRT and 39 (32%) SRT. The primary tumor was grade II-III in 52 patients and grade IV in 69 patients with median Overall Survival (mOS) since first surgery of 113 [Interquartile range: 53.2-137] and 39.7 [24.6-64.9] months respectively (p < 0.01). Overall, mOS from the first day of re-irradiation was 9.7 months [6.5-14.6]. No significant difference in mOS was found between the treatment groups. In multivariate analysis, the Karnofsky performance scale ≥70% (p < 0.01), re-irradiation for first recurrence (p = 0.02), longer time interval between RT start dates (p < 0.01) and smaller planning target volume (p < 0.05) were significant favorable prognostic factors. The reirradiation risk score was validated. CONCLUSION In our series, mOS after reirradiation was sufficient to justify use of this modality. Until a reliable treatment decision tool is developed based on larger retrospective research, the decision for re-irradiation schedule should remain personalized and based on a multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient.
Collapse
|
44
|
A Retrospective Review of Re-irradiating Patients' Recurrent High-grade Gliomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:563-570. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
45
|
Re-irradiation for malignant glioma: Toward patient selection and defining treatment parameters for salvage. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 3:582-590. [PMID: 30370358 PMCID: PMC6200913 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Reirradiation for recurrent glioma remains controversial without knowledge of optimal patient selection, dose, fractionation, and normal tissue tolerances. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes and toxicity after conventionally fractionated reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma, along with the impact of concurrent chemotherapy. Methods and materials We conducted a retrospective review of patients reirradiated for high-grade glioma recurrence between 2007 and 2016 (including patients with initial low-grade glioma). Outcome metrics included overall survival (OS), prognostic factors for survival, and treatment-related toxicity. Results Patients (n = 118; median age 47 years; median Karnofsky performance status score: 80) were re-treated at a median of 28 months (range, 5-214 months) after initial radiation therapy. The median reirradiation dose was 41.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54.0 Gy) to a median lesion volume of 202 cm3 (range, 20-901 cm3). The median cumulative (initial radiation and reirradiation combined) potential maximum brainstem dose was 76.9 Gy (range, 5.0-108.3 Gy) and optic apparatus dose was 56.0 Gy (range, 4.5-90.9 Gy). Of the patients, 56% received concurrent temozolomide, 14%, bevacizumab, and 11%, temozolomide plus bevacizumab; 19% had no chemotherapy. The planned reirradiation was completed by 90% of patients. Median OS from the completion of reirradiation was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-11.7 months) for all patients and 14.0, 11.5, and 6.7 months for patients with initial grade 2, 3, and 4 glioma, respectively. On multivariate analysis, better OS was observed with a >24-month interval between radiation treatments (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5; P < .001), reirradiation dose >41.4 Gy (HR: 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P = .03), and gross total resection before reirradiation (HR: 0.6, 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .02). Radiation necrosis and grade ≥3 late neurotoxicity were both minimal (<5%). No symptomatic persistent brainstem or optic nerve/chiasm injury was identified. Conclusions Salvage reirradiation, even at doses >41.4 Gy in conventional fractionation, along with chemotherapy, was safe and well tolerated with meaningful survival duration. These data provide information that may be useful in implementing safe reirradiation treatments for appropriately selected patients and guiding future studies to define optimal reirradiation doses, maximal safe doses to critical structures, and the role of systemic therapy.
Collapse
|
46
|
Chun SJ, Park SH, Park CK, Kim JW, Kim TM, Choi SH, Lee ST, Kim IH. Survival gain with re-Op/RT for recurred high-grade gliomas depends upon risk groups. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:254-259. [PMID: 29937212 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A majority of high-grade gliomas relapse despite combined surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. There is no consensus on standard treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas, or defined efficacy of adjuvant re-RT after re-Op. This retrospective study evaluated the benefit and safety of re-RT after re-Op (re-Op/RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 84 patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas who underwent reoperation from 2009 to 2015 were analyzed. All patients received neurosurgical intervention and adjuvant radiotherapy previously before recurrence. At recurrence and after reoperation, treatment options were discussed in multidisciplinary clinic or brain tumor joint conference. For re-RT, cumulative EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions at α/β = 2) was below 106.9 Gy. RESULT Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months; 3.5 months with re-Op, 9.0 months with re-Op/RT (p = 0.025). Age <50, time interval to recur ≥12 months, WHO pathologic grade III, methylated MGMT promotor, and re-RT were factors enhancing PFS in the multivariate analysis. Median overall survival (OS) was 18.3 months: 12.7 months with re-Op, and 28.1 months with re-Op/RT (p = 0.066). Three risk factors (age >50, WHO grade IV, and unmethylated promoter of MGMT) were significantly associated with poor OS in multivariate analysis. Benefit of re-RT in both OS and PFS was established in patients carrying 2 or more risk factors. During re-RT, 4 patients (8%) had grade 2 or higher toxicity, and 3 patients (6%) did not complete re-RT. No radionecrosis was observed. CONCLUSION Re-RT after re-Op was tolerable with a cumulative median EQD2 of 99.3 Gy and resulted in clear benefit in PFS and marginal gain in OS. Survival gain with re-Op/RT was more prominent in patients with two or more risk factors (age ≥50, WHO pathologic grade IV, unmethylated MGMT promoter), and needs to be validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seok-Joo Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Sung-Hye Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Chul-Kee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, South Korea
| | - Jin Wook Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Seung Hong Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Soon-Tae Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Il Han Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Re-irradiation as salvage treatment in recurrent glioblastoma: A comprehensive literature review to provide practical answers to frequently asked questions. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 126:80-91. [PMID: 29759570 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Revised: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The primary aim of this review is to provide practical recommendations in terms of fractionation, dose, constraints and selection criteria to be used in the daily clinical routine. Based on the analysis of the literature reviewed, in order to keep the risk of severe side effects ≤3,5%, patients should be stratified according to the target volume. Thus, patients should be treated with different fractionation and total EQD2 (<12.5 ml: EQD2 < 65 Gy with radiosurgery; >12.5 ml and <35 ml: EQD2 < 50 Gy with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy; >35 ml and <50 ml: EQD2 < 36 Gy with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy). Concurrent approaches with temozolomide or bevacizumab do not seem to improve the outcomes of reirradiation and may lead to a higher risk of toxicity but these findings need to be confirmed in prospective series.
Collapse
|
48
|
Combs SE, Niyazi M, Adeberg S, Bougatf N, Kaul D, Fleischmann DF, Gruen A, Fokas E, Rödel CM, Eckert F, Paulsen F, Oehlke O, Grosu AL, Seidlitz A, Lattermann A, Krause M, Baumann M, Guberina M, Stuschke M, Budach V, Belka C, Debus J, Kessel KA. Re-irradiation of recurrent gliomas: pooled analysis and validation of an established prognostic score-report of the Radiation Oncology Group (ROG) of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Cancer Med 2018; 7:1742-1749. [PMID: 29573214 PMCID: PMC5943421 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The heterogeneity of high‐grade glioma recurrences remains an ongoing challenge for the interdisciplinary neurooncology team. Response to re‐irradiation (re‐RT) is heterogeneous, and survival data depend on prognostic factors such as tumor volume, primary histology, age, the possibility of reresection, or time between primary diagnosis and initial RT and re‐RT. In the present pooled analysis, we gathered data from radiooncology centers of the DKTK Consortium and used it to validate the established prognostic score by Combs et al. and its modification by Kessel et al. Data consisted of a large independent, multicenter cohort of 565 high‐grade glioma patients treated with re‐RT from 1997 to 2016 and a median dose of 36 Gy. Primary RT was between 1986 and 2015 with a median dose of 60 Gy. Median age was 54 years; median follow‐up was 7.1 months. Median OS after re‐RT was 7.5, 9.5, and 13.8 months for WHO IV, III, and I/II gliomas, respectively. All six prognostic factors were tested for their significance on OS. Aside from the time from primary RT to re‐RT (P = 0.074) and the reresection status (P = 0.101), all factors (primary histology, age, KPS, and tumor volume) were significant. Both the original and new score showed a highly significant influence on survival with P < 0.001. Both prognostic scores successfully predict survival after re‐RT and can easily be applied in the routine clinical workflow. Now, further prognostic features need to be found to even improve treatment decisions regarding neurooncological interventions for recurrent glioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Bougatf
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel F Fleischmann
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Arne Gruen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Oehlke
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Seidlitz
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Annika Lattermann
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Partner site Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany.,Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Partner sites Munich, Heidelberg, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tübingen, Freiburg, Dresden, Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Menon D, Chelakkot PG. Reirradiation for recurrent primary central nervous system tumors: Eight-year audit from a tertiary cancer care center in South India. Indian J Cancer 2018; 54:409-414. [PMID: 29469068 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_216_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy is a major treatment option in the management of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors, though recurrences after primary treatment, especially in high-grade glial tumors, is a challenge for treating physician. Advances in the field of radiation have made reirradiation a feasible option in recurrent CNS tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Details of patients with primary CNS lesions who presented between 2009 and 2016, with recurrent CNS lesions, and who were treated with reirradiation were retrieved from electronic medical records, as a departmental audit, and the outcome was analyzed. RESULTS A total of 33 patients received reirradiation. Median follow-up was 112.7 months. Median age at presentation was 36 years. On completing initial treatment, 42.4% had no residual disease. Median time to symptomatic recurrence was 51.33 months. For reirradiation, stereotactic radiotherapy was used in 27.3%, stereotactic radiosurgery in 12.1%, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in 36.4%. Mean cumulative 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 111.00 ± 15.287 Gy. At the last follow-up, 57.6% of patients were alive, and 27.3% had succumbed to the disease. Median OS was 187.67 months. Three-year survival after reirradiation was 74.1%. CONCLUSION Our study is probably one of the first from the Indian subcontinent analyzing a series of reirradiation in primary CNS tumors. Our survival subsequent to reirradiation is comparable to that in available literature; which are also mostly retrospective. Our analysis also substantiates that younger patients, longer intervals between the two sets of radiation and biologically effective dose <100 Gy and EQD2Cumulativeof <100 Gy are factors that favorably improve the survival after reirradiation as has been shown in literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Menon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - P G Chelakkot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Peeken JC, Hesse J, Haller B, Kessel KA, Nüsslin F, Combs SE. Semantic imaging features predict disease progression and survival in glioblastoma multiforme patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:580-590. [PMID: 29442128 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1276-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For glioblastoma (GBM), multiple prognostic factors have been identified. Semantic imaging features were shown to be predictive for survival prediction. No similar data have been generated for the prediction of progression. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of the semantic visually accessable REMBRANDT [repository for molecular brain neoplasia data] images (VASARI) imaging feature set for progression and survival, and the creation of joint prognostic models in combination with clinical and pathological information. METHODS 189 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Age, Karnofsky performance status, gender, and MGMT promoter methylation and IDH mutation status were assessed. VASARI features were determined on pre- and postoperative MRIs. Predictive potential was assessed with univariate analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Following variable selection and resampling, multivariate Cox regression models were created. Predictive performance was tested on patient test sets and compared between groups. The frequency of selection for single variables and variable pairs was determined. RESULTS For progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), univariate significant associations were shown for 9 and 10 VASARI features, respectively. Multivariate models yielded concordance indices significantly different from random for the clinical, imaging, combined, and combined + MGMT models of 0.657, 0.636, 0.694, and 0.716 for OS, and 0.602, 0.604, 0.633, and 0.643 for PFS. "Multilocality," "deep white-matter invasion," "satellites," and "ependymal invasion" were over proportionally selected for multivariate model generation, underlining their importance. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated a predictive value of several qualitative imaging features for progression and survival. The performance of prognostic models was increased by combining clinical, pathological, and imaging features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Josefine Hesse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institut for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institut for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fridtjof Nüsslin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|