Characterization of patients receiving palliative chemo- and radiotherapy during end of life at a regional cancer center in Norway

Palliative Radiotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Patterns of Use and Predictors of 30-Day Mortality in End-of-Life Care

Introduction Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common type. More than half of patients require radiotherapy throughout their treatment. Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an important tool for symptom control and quality of life improvement in advanced NSCLC patients. However, the benefits of PRT must be balanced against possible disadvantages, especially in end-of-life (EOL) care. This study aims to describe the profile of PRT-treated deceased NSCLC patients, quantify the proportion of PRT recipients in the last 30 days of life and identify short-term survival prognostic factors in this group. Materials and methods This retrospective analysis was performed at two radiotherapy facilities within the Kent Oncology Centre, UK, for two years, running from January 1, 2022, to January 1, 2024. Data were collected from 857 deceased NSCLC patients who received PRT. Demographics, cancer diagnosis, histology, tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) staging, radiotherapy details, recent treatments, performance status (PS) and comorbidities were analysed. Patients have been stratified as long-term survivors (more than 30 days after PRT initiation, LTS group) along with short-term survivors (STS) (died within 30 days, STS group). Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression have been used in the data analysis. Results Out of 857 patients, 148 (17.3%) died within 30 days of PRT initiation. PS was considerably worse (p = 0.027), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) scores were higher (p = 0.018), and metastatic disease was more prevalent (60.1% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.02) in STS group patients. Fewer patients in the STS group completed their treatment compared to the LTS group (63.5% vs. 82.8%, p < 0.001). The STS group also received lower mean radiation dose (17.7 Gy vs. 19.6 Gy, p = 0.022) and fewer fractions (4.4 vs. 5.2, p = 0.019). The most common RT regimen in both cohorts was 20 Gy in five fractions, used in 55.4% of STS and 49.8% of LTS patients, with no significant difference in single fraction RT use between groups (33.1% in STS vs. 36.8% in LTS, p = 0.401). Multivariate logistic regression identified significant predictors of 30-day mortality: poorer PS (adjusted OR: 1.981, 95% CI: 1.33-3.12, p = 0.001), metastatic disease (adjusted OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.246-3.571, p = 0.002), incomplete PRT (adjusted OR: 0.337, 95% CI: 0.21-0.514, p < 0.001) and no recent chemotherapy (adjusted OR: 0.542, 95% CI: 0.342-0.941, p = 0.044). Conclusion This study demonstrated that compared with previous reports, a higher proportion of NSCLC patients who received PRT died within 30 days of treatment initiation, and low treatment adherence rates highlight challenges in EOL settings. Identification of poor PS and metastatic disease as predictors of short-term mortality would help inform PRT decision-making. The underutilisation of single-fraction radiotherapy and the link between recent chemotherapy and lower 30-day mortality warrant further study. These results highlight the need for better prognostic tools and more selective use of PRT, including increased consideration of single-fraction radiotherapy, in NSCLC patients approaching end of life and emphasise the importance of balancing benefit against treatment burden in this vulnerable population.

Effects of hospice-shared care on terminal cancer patients in Taiwan: A hospital-based observational study

PURPOSE

To assess how hospice-shared care (HSC) affected the likelihood of aggressive medical treatments and the life quality among terminal cancer patients.

METHODS

In the first part, a cohort of 160 late-stage cancer patients who died in non-hospice wards were identified to review their charts in their last 22 days before death. In the second part, a total of 19 late-stage cancer patients with clear consciousness admitted to non-hospice wards were identified to investigate their quality of life for the final 2 weeks before death.

RESULTS

The utilization rate of HSC was 55.6%. Among these, the rate for late referral to HSC (≤7 days before death) was 43.8% and early referral (>3 months before death) was 5.6%. Compared to the non-HSC group, in the last few weeks of life, the HSC group underwent lower incidence of chemotherapy use (10.1% vs. 39.4%, p < .001), signed do-not-resuscitate orders (0% vs. 21.1%, p < .001), emergency room visits (13.5% vs. 40.8%, p < .001), intensive care unit admission or ventilator use (2.2% vs. 11.3%, p = .019), and endotracheal intubation (2.2% vs. 9.9%, p = .038). However, the quality of life did not appear to have obvious differences between the two groups (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

In Taiwan, late HSC referral in terminal cancer patients is common. HSC is associated with a reduced likelihood of aggressive medical utilization. However, the effect of HSC in improving patients' quality of life in the last few weeks needs to be further evaluated.

PALLiative care in ONcology (PALLiON): A cluster-randomised trial investigating the effect of palliative care on the use of anticancer treatment at the end of life

BACKGROUND

Effects on anticancer therapy following the integration of palliative care and oncology are rarely investigated. Thus, its potential effect is unknown.

AIM

To investigate the effects of the complex intervention PALLiON versus usual care on end-of-life anticancer therapy.

DESIGN

Cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT01362816). The complex intervention consisted of a physician education program enhancing theoretical, clinical and communication skills, a patient-centred care pathway and patient symptom reporting prior to all consultations. Primary outcome was overall use, start and cessation of anticancer therapy in the last 3 months before death. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes. Mixed effects logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard were used.

SETTING

A total of 12 Norwegian hospitals (03/2017-02/2021).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ⩾18 years, advanced stage solid tumour, starting last line of anticancer therapy, estimated life expectancy ⩽12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 616 (93%) patients were included (intervention: 309/control:307); 63% males, median age 69, 77% had gastrointestinal cancers. Median survival time from inclusion was 8 (IQR 3-14) and 7 months (IQR 3-12), and days between anticancer therapy start and death were 204 (90-378) and 168 (69-351) (intervention/control). Overall, 78 patients (13%) received anticancer therapy in the last month (intervention: 33 [11%]/control: 45 [15%]). No differences were found in patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We found no significant differences in the probability of receiving end-of-life anticancer therapy. The intervention did not have the desired effect. It was probably too general and too focussed on communication skills to exert a substantial influence on conventional clinical practice.

Prognostic evaluation in patients with advanced cancer in the last months of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline

•This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for using prognostic estimates in advanced cancer. •The guideline covers recommendations for patients with cancer and an expected survival of months or less. •An algorithm for use of clinical predictions, prognostic factors and multivariable risk prediction models is presented. •The author group encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions in Europe, USA and Asia. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.

Evaluating aggressiveness of end-of-life care in patients with advanced cancer: A retrospective single-center analysis

INTRODUCTION

Overuse of anti-cancer therapy near end of life is an important quality-of-care issue. An aggressive approach to treatment can have negative effects on the quality of life and cost of hospital-based resources. The objective of this study was to measure indicators of potential aggressiveness of end-of-life care in a cohort of adult patients with advanced solid tumor. The secondary objective was to analyze the association between clinicopathological variables and indicators of aggressiveness.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis was performed on adult patients with solid tumors who received palliative chemotherapy for advanced cancer and died in our hospital between 2017 and 2019. Indicators of aggressiveness of end of life care included chemotherapy use in the last days of life, emergency room visits and hospitalizations (including intensive care unit admissions) in this period, and referral to a palliative care unit before death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the variables that independently predicted the use of palliative chemotherapy near end of life.

RESULTS

Of the 571 patients included, 128 (22.4%) received chemotherapy within the last 2 weeks of life and 102 (17.8%) start a new chemotherapy regimen 30 days before death. During the last month of life, 168 patients (32.9%) visited emergency room more than once and 117 (20.5%) were hospitalized more than once. A total of 294 patients (51.5%) died in the acute care unit and 285 (49.9%) were referred to the palliative care unit. 24 of them (8.4%) died within 72h after referral.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy near the end of life as well as the rate of emergency room visits and hospitalizations during this period are much higher than the value of the quality standard established in the literature. According to these indicators, cancer patient care at end of life can be considered overly aggressive. Optimization of palliative care at end of life is necessary.

Trends in end-of-life decisions among patients dying in a university hospital oncology ward after implantation of a palliative outpatient clinic

BACKGROUND

The need for high quality palliative care at end-of-life has been increasingly recognized while regional differences exist in its quality and availability. Basic palliative care is given by oncologists at any stage of the disease, but this does not cover the high need for specialized palliative care. The aim of this study was to assess the trends in end-of-life decisions among patients dying in a university hospital oncology ward before and after the implementation of a palliative outpatient clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study population consists of all patients who died in the Kuopio University Hospital oncology ward between 1.1.2010-31.10.2011 and 1.1.2012-31.12.2018. The palliative outpatient clinic was established and set up in November - December 2011. Data on inpatient stays, cancer treatments, treatment decisions, and some background factors were retrieved from electronic records.

RESULTS

The study population totaled 644 patients dying in the oncology ward at KUH (57.8% males; 42.2% females). The deaths comprise 17.2% (191/1108) of all cancer deaths in 2010-2011 and 11.1% (461/4049) in 2012-2018 in the KUH catchment area (North-Savo Health Care District). In years 2012-2018, 14.1% of patients treated at KUH oncology clinic visited the palliative outpatient clinic. The percentage of DNR (do-not-resuscitate), palliative care, and end-of-life (EOL) care decisions increased significantly in the later period. The decisions were mainly made during the last week of life. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy during the last two weeks of life remained stable.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients receiving DNR, palliative care and EOL care decisions increased after the implementation of the palliative outpatient clinic, but the decisions were still made rather late, mainly during the last days of life.

The LabBM score is an excellent survival prediction tool in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy

Background and aim

The prognostic assessment of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy can be conducted by site-specific scores. A quick assessment that would cover the whole spectrum could simplify the working day of clinicians who are not specialists for a particular disease site. This study evaluated a promising score, the LabBM (validated for brain metastases), in patients treated for other indications.

Materials and methods

The LabBM score was calculated in 375 patients by assigning 1 point each for C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal, and 0.5 points each for hemoglobin, platelets and albumin below the lower limit of normal. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

Median overall survival gradually decreased with increasing point sum (range 25.1-1.1 months). When grouped according to the original three-tiered model, excellent discrimination was found. Patients with 0-1 points had a median survival of 15.7 months. Those with 1.5-2 points had a median survival of 5.8 months. Finally, those with 2.5-3.5 points had a median survival of 3.2 months (all p-values ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

The LabBM score, which is derived from inexpensive blood tests and easy to use, stratified patients into three very distinct prognostic groups and deserves further validation.

Chemotherapy use in end-of-life digestive cancer patients: a retrospective AGEO observational study

BACKGROUND

The use of chemotherapy (CT) near the end-of-life (EOL) is an important issue in oncology since it could degrade quality of life. CT near EOL is still poorly studied, with no dedicated study in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients.

AIM

To analyze in GI cancer patients the factors associated with the use of CT within 3- and 1-month before patients' death.

METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive patients who died from a GI cancer in 10 French tertiary care hospitals during 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Clinical, demographical and biological data were collected and compared between patients receiving or not CT within 3- and 1-month before death. Variables associated with overall survival (OS) was also determined using of univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox model.

RESULTS

Four hundred and thirty-seven patients with a metastatic GI cancer were included in this study. Among them, 293 pts (67.0%) received CT within 3-months before death, and 121 pts (27.7%) received CT within 1-month before death. Patients receiving CT within 3-months before death were significantly younger (median age: 65.5 vs 72.8 years, p < 0.0001), with a better PS (PS 0 or 1: 53.9 vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) and a higher albumin level (median: 32.8 vs 31.0 g/L, p = 0.048). Similar results were found for CT within 1 month before death. Palliative care team intervention was less frequent in patients who received CT in their last month of life (39.7% vs 51.3%, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, median OS from diagnosis was shorter in the group receiving CT within 1-month before death (HR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.48-0.74]).

CONCLUSION

In GI-cancer patients, CT is administered within 3- and 1-month before death, in two and one third of patients, respectively. Patients receiving CT within 1-month before death, had more aggressive disease with poor OS. Palliative care team intervention was associated with less administration of CT in the last month of life. These results highlight the need to better anticipate the time to stop CT treatment in the end-of-life and the importance of an active collaboration between oncology and palliative care teams.

Single-institution analysis of the prevalence, indications and outcomes of end-of-life radiotherapy

•

Survival prognostication and patient selection remain challenging tasks.

•

End-of-life radiotherapy until one week before death showed a patient benefit.

•

Treatment prescribed within one week of death often had to be discontinued.

•

Therapy needs to take into account patient preferences for the last phase of life.

Background

Radiotherapy plays an important role for symptom control in advanced stage cancer patients. Yet patients need to be carefully selected, and its use and benefits must be weighed against time spent under treatment and patient priorities in the last phase of life. In this study, we assess prevalence, indications and outcomes of radiotherapy close to death.

Methods

We screened all radiotherapy treatments performed at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2010 and December 2019 to identify those which occurred near patients’ end-of-life. Analyzed data was extracted from the database of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich, the treatment planning system Aria® and the electronical medical records system KISIM®.

Results

Within 60 days of death, 377 radiotherapy courses were prescribed to 280 patients, which constitutes 3.4% of all radiotherapy courses administered over the last decade at our department. Within 60–31, 30–8, and 7–0 days to death 164, 159, and 54 radiotherapy courses were prescribed, respectively. The most frequent treatment sites were brain (N = 122, 32%) and bone (N = 119, 32%), and there was no statistically significant difference in treatment site between the three sub-groups. The most common regimen was 10x3Gy (N = 130, 35%) in all three sub-groups (p = 0.23). Radiotherapy finished more than one week before death was associated with high completion rates (>80%) and treatment benefit (>55%).

Conclusion

Patient selection and survival prognostication remains challenging for radiation oncologists. While radiotherapy achieved high completion and success rates until one week before death, treatment within one week of death should be restricted to carefully selected patients or avoided altogether.

Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy Use in Palliative Care Outpatients With Advanced Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors associated with continuation of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) after palliative care consultation, and SACT administration in the last 30 days of life, in outpatients with cancer referred to palliative care. Timing of referral was of particular interest.

METHODS

Patient, disease, and treatment-related factors associated with SACT before and after palliative care, and in the last 30 days of life, were identified using 3-level multinomial logistic regression. Referral to palliative care was categorized by time from death as early (>12 months), intermediate (6-12 months), and late (≤6 months).

RESULTS

Of the 337 patients, 240 (71.2%) received SACT for advanced cancer; of these, 126 (52.5%) received SACT only prior to palliative care while 114 (47.5%) also received SACT afterward. Only 35/337 (10.4%) received SACT in the last 30 days of life. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with continuing SACT after palliative care consultation were a cancer diagnosis for <1 year (OR 3.09, p = 0.01), breast primary (OR 11.88, p = 0.0008), and early (OR 28.8, p < 0.001) or intermediate (OR 6.67, p < 0.001) referral timing. No factors were significantly associated with receiving SACT in the last 30 days versus earlier, but the median time from palliative care referral to death in those receiving SACT in the last 30 days versus stopping SACT earlier was 1.78 versus 4.27 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received SACT following palliative care consultation were more likely to be referred early; however, patients receiving SACT in their last 30 days tended to be referred late.

Adverse events in deceased hospitalised cancer patients as a measure of quality and safety in end-of-life cancer care

BACKGROUND

Anticancer treatment exposes patients to negative consequences such as increased toxicity and decreased quality of life, and there are clear guidelines recommending limiting use of aggressive anticancer treatments for patients near end of life. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between anticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life and adverse events contributing to death and elucidate how adverse events can be used as a measure of quality and safety in end-of-life cancer care.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 247 deceased hospitalised cancer patients at three hospitals in Norway in 2012 and 2013. The Global Trigger Tool method were used to identify adverse events. We used Poisson regression and binary logistic regression to compare adverse events and association with use of anticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life.

RESULTS

30% of deceased hospitalised cancer patients received some kind of anticancer treatment during the last 30 days of life, mainly systemic anticancer treatment. These patients had 62% more adverse events compared to patients not being treated last 30 days, 39 vs. 24 adverse events per 1000 patient days (p < 0.001, OR 1.62 (1.23-2.15). They also had twice the odds of an adverse event contributing to death compared to patients without such treatment, 33 vs. 18% (p = 0.045, OR 1.85 (1.01-3.36)). Receiving follow up by specialist palliative care reduced the rate of AEs per 1000 patient days in both groups by 29% (p = 0.02, IRR 0.71, CI 95% 0.53-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticancer treatment given during the last 30 days of life is associated with a significantly increased rate of adverse events and related mortality. Patients receiving specialist palliative care had significantly fewer adverse events, supporting recommendations of early integration of palliative care in a patient safety perspective.

The prevalence of cancer associated systemic inflammation: Implications of prognostic studies using the Glasgow Prognostic Score

The prognostic importance of SIR in patients with cancer is widely recognised. More recently it has become clear that the systemic inflammatory response is an important etiologic factor in the development of cancer cachexia. Two recent meta-analysis carried out in 2017 and 2018 were interrogated and the number of patients with specific cancer types were identified. The percentage of patients with operable cancer (n>28,000) who were systemically inflamed varied from 21% to 38%. The percentage of patients with inoperable cancer (n>12,000) who were systemically inflamed varied from 29% to 79%. Overall, the percentage of patients (n>40,000) who were systemically inflamed varied from 28% to 63% according to tumour type. The most commonly studied cancer was colorectal cancer (n∼10,000 patients) and 40% were systemically inflamed.

PALLiON - PALLiative care Integrated in ONcology: study protocol for a Norwegian national cluster-randomized control trial with a complex intervention of early integration of palliative care

BACKGROUND

Several publications have addressed the need for a systematic integration of oncological care focused on the tumor and palliative care (PC) focused on the patient with cancer. The exponential increase in anticancer treatments and the high number of patients living longer with advanced disease have accentuated this. Internationally, there is now a persuasive argument that introducing PC early during anticancer treatment in patients with advanced disease has beneficial effects on symptoms, psychological distress, and survival.

METHODS

This is a national cluster-randomized trial (C-RCT) in 12 Norwegian hospitals. The trial investigates effects of early, systematic integration of oncology and specialized PC in patients with advanced cancer in six intervention hospitals compared with conventional care in six. Hospitals are stratified on the size of local catchment areas before randomization. In the intervention hospitals, a three-part complex intervention will be implemented. The backbone of the intervention is the development and implementation of patient-centered care pathways that contain early, compulsory referral to PC and regular and systematic registrations of symptoms. An educational program must be completed before patient inclusion. A total of 680 patients with advanced cancer and one caregiver per patient are included when patients come for start of last line of chemotherapy, defined according to national treatment guidelines. Data registration, clinical variables, and patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes take place every 2 months for 1 year or until death. The primary outcome is use of chemotherapy in the last 3 months of life by comparing the proportion of patients who receive this in the intervention and control groups. Primary outcome is use of chemotherapy in the last 3 months before death, i.e. number of patients. Secondary outcomes are initiation, discontinuation and number of cycles, last 3 months of life, administration of other medical interventions in the last month of life, symptom burden, quality of life (QoL), satisfaction with information and follow-up, and caregiver health, QoL, and satisfaction with care.

DISCUSSION

Results from this C-RCT will be used to raise the awareness about the positive outcomes of early provision of specialized palliative care using pathways for patients with advanced cancer receiving medical anticancer treatment. The long-term clinical objective is to integrate these patient-centered pathways in Norwegian cancer care. The specific focus on the patient and family and the organization of a predictable care trajectory is consistent with current Norwegian strategies for cancer care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088202. Registered on 23 March 2017.

Assessing the utilization of the decision to implement a palliative goal for the treatment of cancer patients during the last year of life at Helsinki University Hospital: a historic cohort study

Background: To avoid aggressive treatments at the end-of-life and to provide palliative care (PC), physicians need to terminate futile anti-cancer treatments and define the palliative goal of the treatment in time. This single center study assesses the practices used to make the decision that leads to treatment with a palliative goal, i.e., the PC decision and its effect on anti-cancer treatments at the end of life.Material and methods: Patients with a cancer diagnosis treated in tertiary hospital during 1st January 2013 - 31st December 2014 and deceased by the end of 2014 were identified in the hospital database (N = 2737). Of these patients, 992 were randomly selected for this study. The PC decision was screened from patient records, i.e., termination of cancer-specific treatments and a focus on symptom-centered PC.Results: The PC decision was defined in 82% of the patients during the last year of life (49% >30 days and 33% ≤30 days before death, 18% with no decision). The median time from the decision to death was 46 days. Systemic cancer therapy was given during the last month of life in 1%, 36% and 38% (p < .001) and radiotherapy 22%, 40% and 31% (p = .03) cases, respectively; referral to a PC unit was made in 62%, 22% and 11%, respectively (p < .001). In logistic regression analyses younger age, shorter duration of the disease trajectory and type of cancer (e.g., breast cancer) were associated with a lack or late timing of the PC decision.Conclusion: The decision to initiate a palliative goal for the treatment was frequently made for cancer patients but occurred late for every third patient. Younger age and certain cancer types were associated with late PC decisions, thus leading to anti-cancer treatments continuing until close to the death with low access to a PC unit.

The healthcare costs of treating human papillomavirus-related cancers in Norway

Background

Public health efforts to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers include HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening. We quantified the annual healthcare cost of six HPV-related cancers in order to provide inputs in cost-effectiveness analyses and quantify the potential economic savings from prevention of HPV-related cancers in Norway.

Methods

Using individual patient-level data from three unlinked population-based registries, we estimated the mean healthcare costs 1) annually across all phases of disease, 2) during the first 3 years of care following diagnosis, and 3) for the last 12 months of life for patients diagnosed with an HPV-related cancer. We included episodes of care related to primary care physicians, specialist care (private specialists and hospital-based care and prescriptions), and prescription drugs redeemed at pharmacies outside hospitals between 2012 and 2014. We valued costs (2014 €1.00 = NOK 8.357) based on diagnosis-related groups (DRG), patient copayments, reimbursement fees and pharmacy retail prices.

Results

In 2014, the total healthcare cost of HPV-related cancers amounted to €39.8 million, of which specialist care accounted for more than 99% of the total cost. The annual maximum economic burden potentially averted due to HPV vaccination will be lower for vulvar, penile and vaginal cancer (i.e., €984,620, €762,964 and €374,857, respectively) than for cervical, anal and oropharyngeal cancers (i.e., €17.2 million, €6.7 million and €4.6 million, respectively). Over the first three years of treatment following cancer diagnosis, patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer incurred the highest total cost per patient (i.e. €49,774), while penile cancer had the lowest total cost per patient (i.e. €18,350). In general, costs were highest the first year following diagnosis and then declined; however, costs increased rapidly again towards end of life for patients who did not survive.

Conclusion

HPV-related cancers constitute a considerable economic burden to the Norwegian healthcare system. As the proportion of HPV-vaccinated individuals increase and secondary prevention approaches advance, this study highlights the potential economic burden avoided by preventing these cancers.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5596-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Experiences with Prescribing Large Quantities of Systemic Anticancer Therapy Near Death

Background: The most important decision after diagnosing terminal cancer is whether to provide active therapy or withhold treatment. Objective: To analyze the aggressiveness of care by evaluating systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) given near to death, describing this care and identifying factors that determine its use. Design: This involves retrospective observational cohorts study. Setting/Subjects: This involves patients with metastatic tumors who died at a University Hospital in Spain between 2015 and 2016. Measurements: Data obtained from prescribing oncologists and patients' clinical records, type of cancer, and information on treatment. The dependent variable used was the interval between the date of the last dose and date of death. Results: Ninety-four (32.60%) of 288 patients received SACT in the last month of life. This cohort had a higher frequency of lung cancer (OR: 1.58; CI 95%: 1.14-2.18), received more care from oncologist 2 (OR: 1.50; CI 95%: 1.08-2.08), had fewer last-line treatment cycles (OR: 1.28; CI 95%: 1.13-1.45), a lower subjective response (OR: 3.13; CI 95%: 1.34-7.29), less clinical benefit (OR: 2.38; CI 95%: 1.04-5.55), more visits to the Emergency Department (OR: 1.59; CI 95%: 1.06-2.38), and less care from the Palliative Care Unit (OR: 4.55; CI 95%: 2.69-7.70). In multivariate analysis, the predictors of having received SACT close to death remained: receiving fewer cycles of treatment (OR: 1.28; CI 95%: 1.12-1.47) and less palliative care (OR: 4.54; CI 95%: 2.56-7.69). Conclusions: A third of cancer patients received SACT in the last month of life with less efficacy and poorer quality of care than patients not receiving it.

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy near the end of life in lung cancer: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy (RT) can improve quality of life for patients with advanced lung cancer, but treatment can be associated with acute toxicity and symptomatic relief may take several weeks. The optimal fractionation schedule is not known. Delivery of RT near the end of life (EOL) is an emerging indicator of poor quality care. The aim of this study was to determine utilization of palliative thoracic RT in the last 4 weeks of life, and factors associated with its use, in patients with incurable lung cancer in a population-based healthcare system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with lung cancer in British Columbia treated with palliative thoracic RT in 2014 and 2015 were identified. Associations between starting a course of palliative thoracic RT within 4 weeks of death and patient/treatment characteristics were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

1676 courses of palliative thoracic RT were delivered to 1584 lung cancer patients. Median survival was 20 weeks. 12% of palliative thoracic RT courses were delivered in the last 4 weeks of life, with short fractionation schedules and simple RT planning techniques used more frequently near EOL. Of RT courses delivered in the last 4 weeks of life 89% were courses of 1 - 5 fractions, 75% were completed as prescribed and 94% involved simple 1-2 field RT techniques. Receipt of RT in the last 4 weeks of life was associated with male gender, younger age, poor performance status, metastatic disease, small cell carcinoma histology and no prior chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Further study and standardization of quality indicators for palliative RT utilization near EOL is required. Whilst clarification occurs, physicians should consider the prognosis of patients with incurable lung cancer and the realistic expectation of benefit from palliative thoracic RT when considering treatment indications and fractionation schedules.

Changes in medication use in a cohort of patients with advanced cancer: The international multicentre prospective European Palliative Care Cancer Symptom study

BACKGROUND

Information on medication use in the last months of life is limited.

AIM

To describe which medications are prescribed and deprescribed in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care in relation to time before death and to explore associations with demographic variables.

DESIGN

Prospective study, using case report forms for monthly data collection. Medication included cancer treatment and 19 therapeutic groups, grouped into four categories for: (1) cancer therapy, (2) specific cancer-related symptom relief, (3) other symptom relief and (4) long-term prevention. Data were analysed retrospectively using death as the index date. We compared medication use at 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 month(s) before death by constructing five cross-sectional subsamples with medication use during that month. Paired analyses were done on a subsample of patients with at least two assessments before death.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

We studied the medication use of 720 patients (mean age 67, 56% male) in 30 cancer centres representing 12 countries.

RESULTS

From 5 to 1 month(s) before death, cancer therapy decreased (55%-24%), most medications for symptom relief increased, for example, opioids (62%-81%) and sedatives (35%-46%), but medication for long-term prevention decreased (38%-27%). The prevalence of chemotherapy was 15.5% in the last month of life, with 9% of new courses started in the last 2 months. With higher age, chemotherapy and opioid use decreased.

CONCLUSION

Medications for symptom relief increased in almost all medication groups. Deprescribing was found in heart medication/anti-hypertensives and cancer therapy, although use of the latter remained relatively high.

Palliative Chemotherapy Near the End of Life in Oncology Patients

BACKGROUND

Although palliative chemotherapy during end-of-life (EOL) care is used to relieve symptoms in patients with metastatic cancer, chemotherapy may lead to more aggressive EOL care. We evaluated the use of and variables associated with chemotherapy at EOL.

METHODS

This study included data from patients who died from advanced cancer and underwent palliative chemotherapy between April 2007 and May 2017 at the Department of Palliative Care of Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center. Data were collected from hospital medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the variables that independently predicted the use of palliative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among the 542 patients in the study, 85 (15.7%) underwent palliative chemotherapy during the last month and 28 (5.2%) underwent it during the last 2 weeks of life. Age <59 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-2.61), performance status <3 (OR = 3.73, 95% CI: 1.46-4.67), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR = 3.88, 95% CI: 3.01-5.34) were independently associated with the use of chemotherapy. The use of palliative chemotherapy during the last year of life differed significantly by patient age ( P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The observed chemotherapy rates of 15.7% during the last month of life and 5.2% during the last 2 weeks of life are in line with international recommendations. This study showed that palliative chemotherapy is associated with more aggressive EOL care and indicates that younger patients and those with lower performance status are more likely to receive palliative chemotherapy. Significant variations in EOL treatment strategies among different age groups during the last year of life were also identified.

Assessing the utilization of radiotherapy near end of life at a Finnish University Hospital: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy can improve quality of life for cancer patients during the last months of life. However, very short life expectancy may devastate the benefit of the treatment. This single center study assesses the utilization of radiotherapy during the last weeks of life.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All cancer patients (N = 38,982) treated with radiotherapy (N = 11,395) in Turku University Central Hospital during 2005-2013 were identified in the database consisting of electronic patient records. One fourth (N = 2904, 25.5%) of the radiotherapy treatments were given during the last year of life. The last radiotherapy treatments and the time from the last radiotherapy treatment to death were assessed in regards to patients' age, cancer diagnosis, domicile, place of death and the treatment year. Treatments given during the last two weeks of life were also assessed regarding the goal of treatment and the reason for possible discontinuation.

RESULTS

The median time from the last fraction of radiotherapy to death was 84 d. During the last two weeks before death (N = 340), pain (29.4%) was the most common indication for radiotherapy. Treatment was discontinued in 40.6% of the patients during the last two weeks of life, and worsening of general condition was the most common reason for discontinuity (70.3%). The patients receiving radiotherapy during the last weeks of life were more likely to die in tertiary care unit. During the last year of life single-fraction treatment was used only in 7% of all therapy courses. There was a statistically significant (p < .05) decrease in the median number of fractions in the last radiotherapy treatment between 2005-2007 (8 fractions) and 2011-2013 (6 fractions).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 70% of the treatments during the last two weeks of life were not delivered to alleviate pain and utilization of single fraction radiotherapy during the last year of life was infrequent. These observations suggest that practice of radiotherapy during the last weeks of life should be revisited.

End-of-life chemotherapy use at a Finnish university hospital: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recent trends in the end-of-life (EOL) cancer care have suggested that the levels of treatment are becoming more aggressive. The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the time from the last intravenous (IV) chemotherapy treatment to death and identify factors correlating with treatment closer to death.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included all patients diagnosed with cancer at Turku University Central Hospital between the years 2005 and 2013 (N = 38,982) who received IV chemotherapy during the last year of life (N = 3285). The cohort of patients and their respective clinical information were identified from electronic medical records. Statistical analysis was performed to assess and compare the treatment strategies, taking into account the patient's age, the year they were treated, and the type of cancer they were diagnosed with.

RESULTS

A total of 11,250 cancer patients died during the observation time and one-third (N = 3285, 29.2%) of them had received IV chemotherapy during the last year of life. The time from the last IV chemotherapy regimen to death remained consistent across the follow-up time. During the last month of life, every third patient under the age of 50 years and only one-tenth of patients over the age of 80 years received IV chemotherapy. Hematological malignancies and lymphomas were treated closer to death when compared to other diagnostic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

During the period of 9 years, the pattern of EOL IV chemotherapy treatment remained stable. Every third patient died at tertiary care. Only 7.2% of patients who received IV chemotherapy during the last year of life were treated 14 days before death, which is in line with international recommendations. However, significant variation in EOL treatment strategies between different diagnosis and age groups were identified.

Prevalence and determinants of end-of-life chemotherapy use in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Cessation of chemotherapy in the last few weeks of life could be an important quality-of-care benchmark. Proportion of metastatic breast cancer patients who receive end-of-life chemotherapy is not well described. We aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of end-of-life chemotherapy use in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A retrospective cohort study using a prospectively collated database of patients with metastatic breast cancer who died between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2014, was conducted. End-of-life chemotherapy (EOLC) use was defined as receipt of chemotherapy within 2 weeks of death (EOLC2) and receipt of chemotherapy within 4 weeks of death (EOLC4). Patients who did not receive any chemotherapy in the last 4 weeks before death were categorized as non-EOLC. We identified 274 patients with metastatic breast cancer, of whom 28 received EOLC2 (10.2%) and 62 received EOLC4 (22.6%). In comparison with non-EOLC, patients receiving EOLC4 were younger and had greater disease burden. Patients in EOLC4 group received more number of lines of chemotherapy. In a multivariable analysis, younger age at metastatic disease and greater number of metastatic organ systems involved were predictors of end-of-life chemotherapy use. Prevalence of the use of end-of-life chemotherapy in our cohort was higher than previously described. More end-of-life chemotherapy was used in younger women, and those with greater disease burden. Earlier initiation of end-of-life discussions may be targeted to such patients.

The Glasgow prognostic score: Useful information when prescribing palliative radiotherapy

The purpose of the present retrospective study was to investigate whether a score reflecting systemic inflammatory processes [the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS)] provides relevant information for radiation oncologists. GPS is a three-tiered score [0: normal C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin; 1: one abnormal result; 2: increased CRP and low albumin]. Correlations between disease type and extent, resource utilization, survival and GPS were analyzed in 703 patients. In the subgroup with GPS 2, significantly higher rates of lung, adrenal gland and liver metastases were observed. An increasing GPS score was associated with a higher likelihood of anemia, leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. Comparable findings were made regarding utilization of palliative care resources, need for blood transfusion and intravenous administration of antibiotics. Compared with GPS 0 or 1, more patients with GPS 2 did not complete their prescribed course of radiotherapy. One-third of patients with GPS 2 received treatment during the final month of life. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GPS was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (median, 479, 136, and 61 days, for GPS 0, 1 and 2, respectively). In patients with GPS 2 and additional leukocytosis, the median survival was 38 days. In conclusion, GPS provides important prognostic information. This biomarker-based score may be considered for deciding fractionation, and should be validated further.

Prognostic Tools in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

In 2005, the European Association for Palliative Care made recommendations for prognostic markers in advanced cancer. Since then, prognostic tools have been developed, evolved, and validated. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the progress in the development and validation of prognostic tools.

METHODS

Medline, Embase Classic and Embase were searched. Eligible studies met the following criteria: patients with incurable cancer, >18 years, original studies, population n ≥100, and published after 2003. Descriptive and quantitative statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies were eligible, assessing seven prognostic tools across different care settings, primary cancer types, and statistically assessed survival prediction. The Palliative Performance Scale was the most studied (n = 21,082), comprising six parameters (six subjective), was externally validated, and predicted survival. The Palliative Prognostic Score composed of six parameters (four subjective and two objective), the Palliative Prognostic Index composed of nine parameters (nine subjective), and the Glasgow Prognostic Score composed of two parameters (two objective) and were all externally validated in more than 2000 patients with advanced cancer and predicted survival.

CONCLUSION

Various prognostic tools have been validated but vary in their complexity, subjectivity, and therefore clinical utility. The Glasgow Prognostic Score would seem the most favorable as it uses only two parameters (both objective) and has prognostic value complementary to the gold standard measure, which is performance status. Further studies comparing all proved prognostic markers in a single cohort of patients with advanced cancer are needed to determine the optimal prognostic tool.

Geriatric assessment factors are associated with mortality after hospitalization in older adults with cancer

PURPOSE

Survival in older adults with cancer varies given differences in functional status, comorbidities, and nutrition. Prediction of factors associated with mortality, especially in hospitalized patients, allows physicians to better inform their patients about prognosis during treatment decisions. Our objective was to analyze factors associated with survival in older adults with cancer following hospitalization.

METHODS

Through a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 803 patients who were admitted to Barnes-Jewish Hospital's Oncology Acute Care of Elders (OACE) unit from 2000 to 2008. Data collected included geriatric assessments from OACE screening questionnaires as well as demographic and medical history data from chart review. The primary end point was time from index admission to death. The Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed.

RESULTS

The median age was 72.5 years old. Geriatric syndromes and functional impairment were common. Half of the patients (50.4 %) were dependent in one or more activities of daily living (ADLs), and 74 % were dependent in at least one instrumental activity of daily living (IADLs). On multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with worse overall survival: male gender; a total score <20 on Lawton's IADL assessment; reason for admission being cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, inadequate pain control, or failure to thrive; cancer type being thoracic, hepatobiliary, or genitourinary; readmission within 30 days; receiving cancer treatment with palliative rather than curative intent; cognitive impairment; and discharge with hospice services.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults with cancer, certain geriatric parameters are associated with shorter survival after hospitalization. Assessment of functional status, necessity for readmission, and cognitive impairment may provide prognostic information so that oncologists and their patients make more informed, individualized decisions.

Characteristics of the case mix, organisation and delivery in cancer palliative care: a challenge for good-quality research

OBJECTIVES

Palliative care (PC) services and patients differ across countries. Data on PC delivery paired with medical and self-reported data are seldom reported. Aims were to describe (1) PC organisation and services in participating centres and (2) characteristics of patients in PC programmes.

METHODS

This was an international prospective multicentre study with a single web-based survey on PC organisation, services and academics and patients' self-reported symptoms collected at baseline and monthly thereafter, with concurrent registrations of medical data by healthcare providers. Participants were patients ≥18 enrolled in a PC programme.

RESULTS

30 centres in 12 countries participated; 24 hospitals, 4 hospices, 1 nursing home, 1 home-care service. 22 centres (73%) had PC in-house teams and inpatient and outpatient services. 20 centres (67%) had integral chemotherapy/radiotherapy services, and most (28/30) had access to general medical or oncology inpatient units. Physicians or nurses were present 24 hours/7 days in 50% and 60% of centres, respectively. 50 centres (50%) had professorships, and 12 centres (40%) had full-time/part-time research staff. Data were available on 1698 patients: 50% females; median age 66 (range 21-97); median Karnofsky score 70 (10-100); 1409 patients (83%) had metastatic/disseminated disease; tiredness and pain in the past 24 hours were most prominent. During follow-up, 1060 patients (62%) died; 450 (44%) <3 months from inclusion and 701 (68%) within 6 months. ANOVA and χ² tests showed that hospice/nursing home patients were significantly older, had poorer performance status and had shorter survival compared with hospital-patients (p<.0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in PC services and patients across Europe. Detailed characterisation is the first step in improving PC services and research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01362816.

Palliative radiotherapy during the last month of life: Predictability for referring physicians and radiation oncologists

Oncologists commonly overestimate the survival time of patients receiving palliative therapy, which may result in the administration of treatments that are too aggressive for patients near the end of their lives. Previous studies have discussed the negative implications of palliative radiotherapy if administered during the last month of life. Models predicting a limited survival time may improve the ability of the oncologists to tailor the treatment according to the needs of each individual patient. In the present study, prognostic factors for survival time, and the use of palliative radiotherapy during the last month of life, were analyzed in 873 patients. Models predicting the likelihood of administering such therapy were examined, and the risk of receiving radiotherapy during the last month of life was observed to be lower in patients with non-metastatic cancer than in those with metastatic cancer (7 vs. 13%, respectively; P=0.12). On multivariate analysis, 11 factors that significantly influenced the survival time were identified. These findings emphasize the complexity of potential prediction models. The most important risk factor regarding the prediction of extremely short survival times was observed to be an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 4, followed by an ECOG PS of 3 (median survival times, 14 and 64 days, respectively). A limited number of patients who received palliative radiotherapy during their last month of life died unexpectedly. Disease-specific prediction models were developed; however, the small number of events available for analysis limited their immediate clinical impact. Furthermore, these prediction models identified a minority of patients who received radiotherapy during the last month of life. In conclusion, the majority of the palliative radiotherapy courses administered to patients with advanced cancer during their last month of life may be preventable if accurate decision models for the clinic are developed. However, due to the complexity associated with the prediction of survival times in patients receiving palliative radiotherapy, large databases are required to allow accurate models to be established. The present study also discusses the recommendations of the Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine of Nordland Hospital (Bodø, Nordland, Norway) with regard to the use of palliative radiotherapy during the last month of life of patients with terminal cancer.

Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status, and Quality of Life at the End of Life

IMPORTANCE

Although many patients with end-stage cancer are offered chemotherapy to improve quality of life (QOL), the association between chemotherapy and QOL amid progressive metastatic disease has not been well-studied. American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend palliative chemotherapy only for solid tumor patients with good performance status.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between chemotherapy use and QOL near death (QOD) as a function of patients' performance status.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A multi-institutional, longitudinal cohort study of patients with end-stage cancer recruited between September 2002 and February 2008. Chemotherapy use (n = 158 [50.6%]) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status were assessed at baseline (median = 3.8 months before death) and patients with progressive metastatic cancer (N = 312) following at least 1 chemotherapy regimen were followed prospectively until death at 6 outpatient oncology clinics in the United States.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient QOD was determined using validated caregiver ratings of patients' physical and mental distress in their final week.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy use was not associated with patient survival controlling for clinical setting and patients' performance status. Among patients with good (ECOG score = 1) baseline performance status, chemotherapy use compared with nonuse was associated with worse QOD (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75; P = .01). Baseline chemotherapy use was not associated with QOD among patients with moderate (ECOG score = 2) baseline performance status (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.51-2.21; P = .87) or poor (ECOG score = 3) baseline performance status (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.46-3.89; P = .59).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although palliative chemotherapy is used to improve QOL for patients with end-stage cancer, its use did not improve QOD for patients with moderate or poor performance status and worsened QOD for patients with good performance status. The QOD in patients with end-stage cancer is not improved, and can be harmed, by chemotherapy use near death, even in patients with good performance status.