1
|
Li G, Ma N, Wang W, Chen J, Mao J, Jiang G, Wu K. Dose-averaged linear energy transfer within the gross tumor volume of non-small-cell lung cancer affects the local control in carbon-ion radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 201:110584. [PMID: 39414084 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 10/06/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE High linear energy transfer (LET) radiation exhibits stronger tumor-killing effect. However, the correlation between LET and the therapeutic efficacy in Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is currently not clear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the dose-averaged LET (LETd) distribution within tumor and local recurrence for LA-NSCLC treated with CIRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS An analysis of 62 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC who underwent CIRT from 2018 to 2022 was conducted. The LETd distribution was calculated based on their treated plans, and the correlation between local recurrence and LETd, relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted doses (DRBE) and clinical factors was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were performed based on that. RESULTS 16 patients were defined as local recurrence. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) at 24 months were 76.9 % and 73.2 %, respectively. The mean LETd in internal gross tumor volume (iGTV) in the local recurrence group was 48.7 keV/µm, significantly lower than the mean LETd of 53.2 keV/µm in the local control group (p = 0.016). No significant difference was observed in DRBE between the local recurrence and local control groups. ROC curve analysis indicated that a percentage of 88 % of volume in iGTV receiving at least 40 keV/µm (V40keV/μm) is the optimal threshold for predicting local recurrence (Area under curve (AUC) = 0.7636). The log-rank test and Cox regression analysis revealed that the LETd value covering 98 % volume of iGTV (LETd98%) was a significant risk factor for LC (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed an association between LETd distribution and local recurrence in patients with LA-NSCLC. These findings suggest that lower LETd may increase the probability of local recurrence. We suggest that LETd distribution within iGTV should be routinely assessed in CIRT for lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangsheng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ningyi Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiwei Wang
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingfang Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoliang Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Kailiang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai 201315, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lyngholm E, Stokkevåg CH, Lühr A, Tian L, Meric I, Tjelta J, Henjum H, Handeland AH, Ytre-Hauge KS. An updated variable RBE model for proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:125025. [PMID: 38527373 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad3796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective.While a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 forms the basis for clinical proton therapy, variable RBE models are increasingly being used in plan evaluation. However, there is substantial variation across RBE models, and several newin vitrodatasets have not yet been included in the existing models. In this study, an updatedin vitroproton RBE database was collected and used to examine current RBE model assumptions, and to propose an up-to-date RBE model as a tool for evaluating RBE effects in clinical settings.Approach.A proton database (471 data points) was collected from the literature, almost twice the size of the previously largest model database. Each data point included linear-quadratic model parameters and linear energy transfer (LET). Statistical analyses were performed to test the validity of commonly applied assumptions of phenomenological RBE models, and new model functions were proposed forRBEmaxandRBEmin(RBE at the lower and upper dose limits). Previously published models were refitted to the database and compared to the new model in terms of model performance and RBE estimates.Main results.The statistical analysis indicated that the intercept of theRBEmaxfunction should be a free fitting parameter and RBE estimates were clearly higher for models with free intercept.RBEminincreased with increasing LET, while a dependency ofRBEminon the reference radiation fractionation sensitivity (α/βx) did not significantly improve model performance. Evaluating the models, the new model gave overall lowest RMSE and highest R2 score. RBE estimates in the distal part of a spread-out-Bragg-peak in water (α/βx= 2.1 Gy) were 1.24-1.51 for original models, 1.25-1.49 for refits and 1.42 for the new model.Significance.An updated RBE model based on the currently largest database among published phenomenological models was proposed. Overall, the new model showed better performance compared to refitted published RBE models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erlend Lyngholm
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Armin Lühr
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Liheng Tian
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Ilker Meric
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Johannes Tjelta
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Andreas Havsgård Handeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parrella G, Magro G, Chalaszczyk A, Rotondi M, Ciocca M, Glimelius L, Fiore MR, Paganelli C, Orlandi E, Molinelli S, Baroni G. Balancing benefits and limitations of linear energy transfer optimization in carbon ion radiotherapy for large sacral chordomas. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100624. [PMID: 39206357 PMCID: PMC11357807 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose A low linear energy transfer (LET) in the target can reduce the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This study aimed at exploring benefits and limitations of LET optimization for large sacral chordomas (SC) undergoing CIRT. Materials and Methods Seventeen cases were used to tune LET-based optimization, and seven to independently test interfraction plan robustness. For each patient, a reference plan was optimized on biologically-weighted dose cost functions. For the first group, 7 LET-optimized plans were obtained by increasing the gross tumor volume (GTV) minimum LETd (minLETd) in the range 37-55 keV/μm, in steps of 3 keV/μm. The optimal LET-optimized plan (LETOPT) was the one maximizing LETd, while adhering to clinical acceptability criteria. Reference and LETOPT plans were compared through dose and LETd metrics (D x , L x to x% volume) for the GTV, clinical target volume (CTV), and organs at risk (OARs). The 7 held-out cases were optimized setting minLETd to the average GTV L98% of the investigation cohort. Both reference and LETOPT plans were recalculated on re-evaluation CTs and compared. Results GTV L98% increased from (31.8 ± 2.5)keV/μm to (47.6 ± 3.1)keV/μm on the LETOPT plans, while the fraction of GTV receiving over 50 keV/μm increased on average by 36% (p < 0.001), without affecting target coverage goals, or impacting LETd and dose to OARs. The interfraction analysis showed no significant worsening with minLETd set to 48 keV/μm. Conclusion LETd optimization for large SC could boost the LETd in the GTV without significantly compromising plan quality, potentially improving the therapeutic effects of CIRT for large radioresistant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Parrella
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G.Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi, 53, 11 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Agnieszka Chalaszczyk
- Radiotherapy Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi, 53, 11 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Rotondi
- Raysearch Laboratories, Eugeniavägen 18, 113 68 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi, 53, 11 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Lars Glimelius
- Raysearch Laboratories, Eugeniavägen 18, 113 68 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria R. Fiore
- Radiotherapy Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi, 53, 11 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G.Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Via A. Brambilla 74, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Clinical Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi, 53, 11 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Strada Campeggi, 53, 11 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G.Ponzio 34/5, 20133 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schafasand M, Resch AF, Nachankar A, Gora J, Traneus E, Glimelius L, Georg D, Stock M, Carlino A, Fossati P. Investigation on the physical dose filtered by linear energy transfer for treatment plan evaluation in carbon ion therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:556-565. [PMID: 37727137 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large tumor size has been reported as a predicting factor for inferior clinical outcome in carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Besides the clinical factors accompanied with such tumors, larger tumors receive typically more low linear energy transfer (LET) contributions than small ones which may be the underlying physical cause. Although dose averaged LET is often used as a single parameter descriptor to quantify the beam quality, there is no evidence that this parameter is the optimal clinical predictor for the complex mixed radiation fields in CIRT. PURPOSE Purpose of this study was to investigate on a novel dosimetric quantity, namely high-LET-dose (D > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ , the physical dose filtered based on an LET threshold) as a single parameter estimator to differentiate between carbon ion treatment plans (cTP) with a small and large tumor volume. METHODS Ten cTPs with a planning target volume,PTV ≥ 500 cm 3 $\mathrm{PTV}\ge {500}\,{{\rm cm}^{3}}$ (large) and nine with aPTV < 500 cm 3 $\mathrm{PTV}<{500}\,{{\rm cm}^{3}}$ (small) were selected for this study. To find a reasonable LET threshold (L thr $\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}$ ) that results in a significant difference in terms ofD > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ , the voxel based normalized high-LET-dose (D ̂ > L thr $\hat{\textrm {D}}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ ) distribution in the clinical target volume (CTV) was studied on a subset (12 out of 19 cTPs) for 18 LET thresholds, using standard distribution descriptors (mean, variance and skewness). The classical dose volume histogram concept was used to evaluate theD > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ andD ̂ > L thr $\hat{\textrm {D}}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ distributions within the target of all 19 cTPs at the before determinedL thr $\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}$ . Statistical significance of the difference between the two groups in terms of meanD > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ andD ̂ > L thr $\hat{\textrm {D}}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ volume histogram parameters was evaluated by means of (two-sided) t-test or Mann-Whitney-U-test. In addition, the minimum target coverage at the above determinedL thr $\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}$ was compared and validated against three other thresholds to verify its potential in differentiation between small and large volume tumors. RESULTS AnL thr $\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}$ of approximately30 keV / μ m ${30}\,{\rm keV/}\umu {\rm m}$ was found to be a reasonable threshold to classify the two groups. At this threshold, theD > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ andD ̂ > L thr $\hat{\textrm {D}}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ were significantly larger (p < 0.05 $p<0.05$ ) in small CTVs. For the small tumor group, the near-minimum and medianD > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ (andD ̂ > L thr $\hat{\textrm {D}}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ ) in the CTV were in average9.3 ± 1.5 Gy $9.3\pm {1.5}\,{\rm Gy}$ (0.31 ± 0.08) and13.6 ± 1.6 Gy $13.6\pm {1.6}\,{\rm Gy}$ (0.46 ± 0.06), respectively. For the large tumors, these parameters were6.6 ± 0.2 Gy $6.6\pm {0.2}\,{\rm Gy}$ (0.20 ± 0.01) and8.6 ± 0.4 Gy $8.6\pm {0.4}\,{\rm Gy}$ (0.28 ± 0.02). The difference between the two groups in terms of mean near-minimum and medianD > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ (D ̂ > L thr $\hat{\textrm {D}}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ ) was 2.7 Gy (11%) and 5.0 Gy (18%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The feasibility of high-LET-dose based evaluation was shown in this study where a lowerD > L thr $\textrm {D}_{>\textrm {L}_{\textrm {thr}}}$ was found in cTPs with a large tumor size. Further investigation is needed to draw clinical conclusions. The proposed methodology in this work can be utilized for future high-LET-dose based studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansure Schafasand
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Ankita Nachankar
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- ACMIT Gmbh, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Joanna Gora
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | | | | | - Dietmar Georg
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Oncology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | | | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Oncology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fredriksson A, Glimelius L, Bokrantz R. The LET trilemma: Conflicts between robust target coverage, uniform dose, and dose-averaged LET in carbon therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:7338-7348. [PMID: 37820319 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linear energy transfer (LET) is closely related to the biological effect of ionizing radiation. Increasing the dose-averaged LET (LETd ) within the target volume has been proposed as a means to improve clinical outcome for hypoxic tumors. However, doing so can lead to reduced robustness to range uncertainty. PURPOSE To quantify the relationship between robust target coverage, target dose uniformity, and LETd , we employ robust optimization using dose-based and LETd -based functions and allow varying amounts of target non-uniformity. METHODS AND MATERIALS Robust carbon therapy optimization is used to create plans for phantom cases with increasing target sizes (radii 1, 3, and 5 cm). First, the influence of respectively range and setup uncertainty on the LETd in the target is studied. Second, we employ strategies allowing overdosage in the clinical target volume (CTV) or gross tumor volume (GTV), which enable increased LETd in the target. The relationship between robust target coverage and LETd in the target is illustrated by tradeoff curves generated by optimization using varying weights for the LETd -based functions. RESULTS As the range uncertainty used in the robust optimization increased from 0% to 5%, the near-minimum nominal LETd decreased by 17%-29% (9-21 keV/µm) for the different target sizes. The effect of increasing setup uncertainty was marginal. Allowing 10% overdosage in the CTV enabled 9%-29% (6-12 keV/µm) increased near-minimum worst case LETd for the different target sizes, compared to uniform dose plans. When 10% overdosage was allowed in the GTV only, the increase was 1%-20% (1-8 keV/µm). CONCLUSIONS There is an inherent conflict between range uncertainty robustness and high LETd in the target, which is aggravated with increasing target size. For large tumors, it is possible to simultaneously achieve two of the three qualities range robustness, uniform dose, and high LETd in the target.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sokol O, Durante M. Carbon Ions for Hypoxic Tumors: Are We Making the Most of Them? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4494. [PMID: 37760464 PMCID: PMC10526811 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Hypoxia, which is associated with abnormal vessel growth, is a characteristic feature of many solid tumors that increases their metastatic potential and resistance to radiotherapy. Carbon-ion radiation therapy, either alone or in combination with other treatments, is one of the most promising treatments for hypoxic tumors because the oxygen enhancement ratio decreases with increasing particle LET. Nevertheless, current clinical practice does not yet fully benefit from the use of carbon ions to tackle hypoxia. Here, we provide an overview of the existing experimental and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of C-ion radiotherapy in overcoming hypoxia-induced radioresistance, followed by a discussion of the strategies proposed to enhance it, including different approaches to maximize LET in the tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Sokol
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforchung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany;
| | - Marco Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforchung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany;
- Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Hochschulstraße 8, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Henjum H, Dahle TJ, Mairani A, Pilskog S, Stokkevåg C, Boer CG, Redalen KR, Minn H, Malinen E, Ytre‐Hauge KS. Combined RBE and OER optimization in proton therapy with FLUKA based on EF5-PET. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14014. [PMID: 37161820 PMCID: PMC10476997 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor hypoxia is associated with poor treatment outcome. Hypoxic regions are more radioresistant than well-oxygenated regions, as quantified by the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). In optimization of proton therapy, including OER in addition to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) could therefore be used to adapt to patient-specific radioresistance governed by intrinsic radiosensitivity and hypoxia. METHODS A combined RBE and OER weighted dose (ROWD) calculation method was implemented in a FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment planning tool. The method is based on the linear quadratic model, with α and β parameters as a function of the OER, and therefore a function of the linear energy transfer (LET) and partial oxygen pressure (pO2 ). Proton therapy plans for two head and neck cancer (HNC) patients were optimized with pO2 estimated from [18 F]-EF5 positron emission tomography (PET) images. For the ROWD calculations, an RBE of 1.1 (RBE1.1,OER ) and two variable RBE models, Rørvik (ROR) and McNamara (MCN), were used, alongside a reference plan without incorporation of OER (RBE1.1 ). RESULTS For the HNC patients, treatment plans in line with the prescription dose and with acceptable target ROWD could be generated with the established tool. The physical dose was the main factor modulated in the ROWD. The impact of incorporating OER during optimization of HNC patients was demonstrated by the substantial difference found between ROWD and physical dose in the hypoxic tumor region. The largest physical dose differences between the ROWD optimized plans and the reference plan was 12.2 Gy. CONCLUSION The FLUKA MC based tool was able to optimize proton treatment plans taking the tumor pO2 distribution from hypoxia PET images into account. Independent of RBE-model, both elevated LET and physical dose were found in the hypoxic regions, which shows the potential to increase the tumor control compared to a conventional optimization approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Tordis Johnsen Dahle
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of Oncology and Medical PhysicsHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation)PaviaItaly
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Sara Pilskog
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of Oncology and Medical PhysicsHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Camilla Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of Oncology and Medical PhysicsHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | | | - Kathrine Røe Redalen
- Department of PhysicsNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | - Heikki Minn
- Department of Oncology and RadiotherapyTurku University HospitalTurkuFinland
- Turku PET CentreUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Department of Medical PhysicsOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
McIntyre M, Wilson P, Gorayski P, Bezak E. A Systematic Review of LET-Guided Treatment Plan Optimisation in Proton Therapy: Identifying the Current State and Future Needs. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4268. [PMID: 37686544 PMCID: PMC10486456 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The well-known clinical benefits of proton therapy are achieved through higher target-conformality and normal tissue sparing than conventional radiotherapy. However, there is an increased sensitivity to uncertainties in patient motion/setup, proton range and radiobiological effect. Although recent efforts have mitigated some uncertainties, radiobiological effect remains unresolved due to a lack of clinical data for relevant endpoints. Therefore, RBE optimisations may be currently unsuitable for clinical treatment planning. LET optimisation is a novel method that substitutes RBE with LET, shifting LET hotspots outside critical structures. This review outlines the current status of LET optimisation in proton therapy, highlighting knowledge gaps and possible future research. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a search of the MEDLINE® and Scopus databases was performed in July 2023, identifying 70 relevant articles. Generally, LET optimisation methods achieved their treatment objectives; however, clinical benefit is patient-dependent. Inconsistencies in the reported data suggest further testing is required to identify therapeutically favourable methods. We discuss the methods which are suitable for near-future clinical deployment, with fast computation times and compatibility with existing treatment protocols. Although there is some clinical evidence of a correlation between high LET and adverse effects, further developments are needed to inform future patient selection protocols for widespread application of LET optimisation in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa McIntyre
- Allied Health & Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Allied Health & Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Allied Health & Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Hypoxia (oxygen deprivation) occurs in most solid malignancies, albeit with considerable heterogeneity. Hypoxia is associated with an aggressive cancer phenotype by promotion of genomic instability, evasion of anti-cancer therapies including radiotherapy and enhancement of metastatic risk. Therefore, hypoxia results in poor cancer outcomes. Targeting hypoxia to improve cancer outcomes is an attractive therapeutic strategy. Hypoxia-targeted dose painting escalates radiotherapy dose to hypoxic sub-volumes, as quantified and spatially mapped using hypoxia imaging. This therapeutic approach could overcome hypoxia-induced radioresistance and improve patient outcomes without the need for hypoxia-targeted drugs. This article will review the premise and underpinning evidence for personalized hypoxia-targeted dose painting. It will present data on relevant hypoxia imaging biomarkers, highlight the challenges and potential benefit of this approach and provide recommendations for future research priorities in this field. Personalized hypoxia-based radiotherapy de-escalation strategies will also be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Salem
- Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schafasand M, Resch AF, Traneus E, Glimelius L, Fossati P, Stock M, Gora J, Georg D, Carlino A. Technical note: In silico benchmarking of the linear energy transfer-based functionalities for carbon ion beams in a commercial treatment planning system. Med Phys 2023; 50:1871-1878. [PMID: 36534738 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing number of studies dealing with linear energy transfer (LET)-based evaluation and optimization in the field of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) indicates the rising demand for LET implementation in commercial treatment planning systems (TPS). Benchmarking studies could play a key role in detecting (and thus preventing) computation errors prior implementing such functionalities in a TPS. PURPOSE This in silico study was conducted to benchmark the following two LET-related functionalities in a commercial TPS against Monte Carlo simulations: (1) dose averaged LET (LETd ) scoring and (2) physical dose filtration based on LET for future LET-based treatment plan evaluation and optimization studies. METHODS The LETd scoring and LET-based dose filtering (in which the deposited dose can be separated into the dose below and above the user specified LET threshold) functionalities for carbon ions in the research version RayStation (RS) 9A-IonPG TPS (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden) were benchmarked against GATE/Geant4 simulations. Pristine Bragg peaks (BPs) and cuboid targets, positioned at different depths in a homogeneous water phantom and a setup with heterogeneity were used for this study. RESULTS For all setups (homogeneous and heterogeneous), the mean absolute (and relative) LETd difference was less than 1 keV/ μ $\umu$ m (3.5%) in the plateau and target and less than 2 keV/ μ $\umu$ m (8.3%) in the fragmentation tail. The maximum local differences were 4 and 6 keV/ μ $\umu$ m, respectively. The mean absolute (and relative) physical dose differences for both low- and high-LET doses were less than 1 cGy (1.5%) in the plateau, target and tail with a maximum absolute difference of 2 cGy. CONCLUSIONS No computation error was found in the tested functionalities except for LETd in lateral direction outside the target, showing the limitation of the implemented monochrome model in the tested TPS version.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansure Schafasand
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Franz Resch
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Oncology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Oncology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Joanna Gora
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Potential benefits of using radioactive ion beams for range margin reduction in carbon ion therapy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21792. [PMID: 36526710 PMCID: PMC9758201 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26290-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Sharp dose gradients and high biological effectiveness make ions such as 12C an ideal tool to treat deep-seated tumors, however, at the same time, sensitive to errors in the range prediction. Tumor safety margins mitigate these uncertainties, but during the irradiation they lead to unavoidable damage to the surrounding healthy tissue. To fully exploit the Bragg peak benefits, a large effort is put into establishing precise range verification methods. Despite positron emission tomography being widely in use for this purpose in 12C therapy, the low count rates, biological washout, and broad activity distribution still limit its precision. Instead, radioactive beams used directly for treatment would yield an improved signal and a closer match with the dose fall-off, potentially enabling precise in vivo beam range monitoring. We have performed a treatment planning study to estimate the possible impact of the reduced range uncertainties, enabled by radioactive 11C ions treatments, on sparing critical organs in tumor proximity. Compared to 12C treatments, (i) annihilation maps for 11C ions can reflect sub- millimeter shifts in dose distributions in the patient, (ii) outcomes of treatment planning with 11C significantly improve and (iii) less severe toxicities for serial and parallel critical organs can be expected.
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen M, Cao W, Yepes P, Guan F, Poenisch F, Xu C, Chen J, Li Y, Vazquez I, Yang M, Zhu XR, Zhang X. Impact of dose calculation accuracy on inverse linear energy transfer optimization for intensity‐modulated proton therapy. PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Wenhua Cao
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Pablo Yepes
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
- Physics and Astronomy Department Rice University Houston Texas USA
| | - Fada Guan
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Falk Poenisch
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
| | - Yupeng Li
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Ivan Vazquez
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Ming Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - X. Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chaudhary P, Gwynne DC, Odlozilik B, McMurray A, Milluzzo G, Maiorino C, Doria D, Ahmed H, Romagnani L, Alejo A, Padda H, Green J, Carroll D, Booth N, McKenna P, Kar S, Petringa G, Catalano R, Cammarata FP, Cirrone GAP, McMahon SJ, Prise KM, Borghesi M. Development of a portable hypoxia chamber for ultra-high dose rate laser-driven proton radiobiology applications. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:77. [PMID: 35428301 PMCID: PMC9013042 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02024-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is currently significant interest in assessing the role of oxygen in the radiobiological effects at ultra-high dose rates. Oxygen modulation is postulated to play a role in the enhanced sparing effect observed in FLASH radiotherapy, where particles are delivered at 40–1000 Gy/s. Furthermore, the development of laser-driven accelerators now enables radiobiology experiments in extreme regimes where dose rates can exceed 109 Gy/s, and predicted oxygen depletion effects on cellular response can be tested. Access to appropriate experimental enviroments, allowing measurements under controlled oxygenation conditions, is a key requirement for these studies. We report on the development and application of a bespoke portable hypoxia chamber specifically designed for experiments employing laser-driven sources, but also suitable for comparator studies under FLASH and conventional irradiation conditions. Materials and methods We used oxygen concentration measurements to test the induction of hypoxia and the maintenance capacity of the chambers. Cellular hypoxia induction was verified using hypoxia inducible factor-1α immunostaining. Calibrated radiochromic films and GEANT-4 simulations verified the dosimetry variations inside and outside the chambers. We irradiated hypoxic human skin fibroblasts (AG01522B) cells with laser-driven protons, conventional protons and reference 225 kVp X-rays to quantify DNA DSB damage and repair under hypoxia. We further measured the oxygen enhancement ratio for cell survival after X-ray exposure in normal fibroblast and radioresistant patient- derived GBM stem cells. Results Oxygen measurements showed that our chambers maintained a radiobiological hypoxic environment for at least 45 min and pathological hypoxia for up to 24 h after disconnecting the chambers from the gas supply. We observed a significant reduction in the 53BP1 foci induced by laser-driven protons, conventional protons and X-rays in the hypoxic cells compared to normoxic cells at 30 min post-irradiation. Under hypoxic irradiations, the Laser-driven protons induced significant residual DNA DSB damage in hypoxic AG01522B cells compared to the conventional dose rate protons suggesting an important impact of these extremely high dose-rate exposures. We obtained an oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) of 2.1 ± 0.1 and 2.5 ± 0.1 respectively for the AG01522B and patient-derived GBM stem cells for X-ray irradiation using our hypoxia chambers. Conclusion We demonstrated the design and application of portable hypoxia chambers for studying cellular radiobiological endpoints after exposure to laser-driven protons at ultra-high dose, conventional protons and X-rays. Suitable levels of reduced oxygen concentration could be maintained in the absence of external gassing to quantify hypoxic effects. The data obtained provided indication of an enhanced residual DNA DSB damage under hypoxic conditions at ultra-high dose rate compared to the conventional protons or X-rays. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02024-3.
Collapse
|
14
|
In-vitro 3D modelling for charged particle therapy - Uncertainties and opportunities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2021; 179:114018. [PMID: 34688685 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a critical component of oncologic management, with more than half of all cancer patients requiring radiotherapy at some point during their disease course. Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in charged particle therapy due to its advantageous physical and radiobiologic properties, with the therapeutic use of proton beam therapy (PBT) expanding worldwide. However, there remain large gaps in our knowledge of the radiobiologic mechanisms that underlie key aspects of PBT, such as variations in relative biologic effectiveness (RBE), radioresistance, DNA damage response and repair pathways, as well as immunologic effects. In addition, while the emerging technique of ultra-high dose rate or FLASH radiotherapy, with its potential to further reduce normal tissue toxicities, is an exciting development, in-depth study is needed into the postulated biochemical mechanisms that underpin the FLASH effect such as the oxygen depletion hypothesis as well as the relative contributions of immune responses and the tumor microenvironment. Further investigation is also required to ensure that the FLASH effect is not diminished or lost in PBT. Current methods to evaluate the biologic effects of charged particle therapy rely heavily on 2D cell culture systems and/or animal models. However, both of these methods have well-recognized limitations which limit translatability of findings from bench to bedside. The advent of novel three-dimensional in-vitro tumor models offers a more physiologically relevant and high throughput in-vitro system for the study of tumor development as well as novel therapeutic approaches such as PBT. Advances in 3D cell culture methods, together with knowledge of disease mechanism, biomarkers, and genomic data, can be used to design personalized 3D models that most closely recapitulate tumor microenvironmental factors promoting a particular disease phenotype, moving 3D models and PBT into the age of precision medicine.
Collapse
|
15
|
Leleu T, Bastit V, Doré M, Kammerer E, Florescu C, Alfonsi M, Troussier I, Bensadoun RJ, Biau J, Blais E, Coutte A, Deberne M, Wiazzane N, Dupin C, Faivre JC, Giraud P, Graff P, Guihard S, Huguet F, Janoray G, Liem X, Pointreau Y, Racadot S, Schick U, Servagi-Vernat S, Sun XS, Thureau S, Villa J, Vulquin N, Wong S, Patron V, Thariat J. Histosurgical mapping of endoscopic endonasal surgery of sinonasal tumours to improve radiotherapy guidance. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:440-444. [PMID: 34175228 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is becoming a standard for most malignant sinonasal tumours. Margin analysis after piecemeal resection is complex and optimally relies on accurate histosurgical mapping. Postoperative radiotherapy may be adapted based on margin assessment mapping to reduce the dose to some sinonasal subvolumes. We assessed the use of histosurgical mapping by radiation oncologists (RO). MATERIAL AND METHODS A French practice survey was performed across 29 ENT expert RO (2 did not answer) regarding integration of information on EES, as well as quality of operative and pathology reportsto refine radiotherapy planning after EES. This was assessed through an electronic questionnaire. RESULTS EES was ubiquitously performed in France. Operative and pathology reports yielded accurate description of EES samples according to 66.7% of interviewed RO. Accuracy of margin assessment was however insufficient according to more than 40.0% of RO. Additional margins/biopsies of the operative bed were available in 55.2% (16/29) of the centres. In the absence of additional margins, quality of resection after EES was considered as microscopically incomplete in 48.3% or dubious in 48.3% of RO. As performed, histosurgical mapping allowed radiotherapy dose and volumes adaptation according to 26.3% of RO only. CONCLUSIONS Standardized histosurgical mapping with margin and additional margin analysis could be more systematic. Advantages of accurate EES reporting could be dose painting radiotherapy to further decrease morbidity in sinonasal tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Leleu
- Department of radiation oncology, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - V Bastit
- Department of surgery, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - E Kammerer
- Department of radiation oncology, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - C Florescu
- Department of radiation oncology, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | - J Biau
- CJP, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Blais
- AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - X S Sun
- CHU, Besançon Montbéliard, France
| | | | | | | | | | - V Patron
- Department of ENT surgery, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| | - J Thariat
- Department of radiation oncology, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France; Unicaen, Normandie Université, Caen, France; GORTEC, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mein S, Tessonnier T, Kopp B, Harrabi S, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Haberer T, Mairani A. Spot-Scanning Hadron Arc (SHArc) Therapy: A Study With Light and Heavy Ions. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100661. [PMID: 33817410 PMCID: PMC8010580 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical potential of spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) therapy with a heavy-ion gantry. METHODS AND MATERIALS A series of in silico studies was conducted via treatment plan optimization in FRoG and the RayStation TPS to compare SHArc therapy against reference plans using conventional techniques with single, parallel-opposed, and 3-field configurations for 3 clinical particle beams (protons [p], helium [4He], and carbon [12C] ions). Tests were performed on water-equivalent cylindrical phantoms for simple targets and clinical-like scenarios with an organ-at-risk in proximity of the target. Effective dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETD) distributions for SHArc were evaluated against conventional planning techniques applying the modified microdosimetric kinetic model for considering bio-effect with (α/β)x = 2 Gy. A model for hypoxia-induced tumor radio-resistance was developed for particle therapy with dependence on oxygen concentration and particle species/energy (Zeff/β)2 to investigate the impact on effective dose. RESULTS SHArc plans exhibited similar target coverage with unique treatment attributes and distributions compared with conventional planning, with carbon ions demonstrating the greatest potential for tumor control and normal tissue sparing among the arc techniques. All SHArc plans exhibited a low-dose bath outside the target volume with a reduced maximum dose in normal tissues compared with single, parallel-opposed, and 3-field configuration plans. Moreover, favorable LETD distributions were made possible using the SHArc approach, with maximum LETD in the r = 5 mm tumor core (~8 keVμm-1, ~30 keVμm-1, and ~150 keVμm-1 for p, 4He, and 12C ions, respectively) and reductions of high-LET regions in normal tissues and organs-at-risk compared with static treatment beam delivery. CONCLUSION SHArc therapy offers potential treatment benefits such as increased normal tissue sparing. Without explicit consideration of oxygen concentration during treatment planning and optimization, SHArc-C may mitigate tumor hypoxia-induced loss of efficacy. Findings justify further development of robust SHArc treatment planning toward potential clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kopp
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dahle TJ, Rusten E, Stokkevåg CH, Silvoniemi A, Mairani A, Fjæra LF, Rørvik E, Henjum H, Wright P, Boer CG, Forsback S, Minn H, Malinen E, Ytre-Hauge KS. The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with an OER model for biologically weighted dose calculations in proton therapy of hypoxic tumors. Phys Med 2020; 76:166-172. [PMID: 32683269 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increased radioresistance of hypoxic cells compared to well-oxygenated cells is quantified by the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). In this study we created a FLUKA Monte Carlo based tool for inclusion of both OER and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in biologically weighted dose (ROWD) calculations in proton therapy and applied this to explore the impact of hypoxia. METHODS The RBE-weighted dose was adapted for hypoxia by making RBE model parameters dependent on the OER, in addition to the linear energy transfer (LET). The OER depends on the partial oxygen pressure (pO2) and LET. To demonstrate model performance, calculations were done with spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBP) in water phantoms with pO2 ranging from strongly hypoxic to normoxic (0.01-30 mmHg) and with a head and neck cancer proton plan optimized with an RBE of 1.1 and pO2 estimated voxel-by-voxel using [18F]-EF5 PET. An RBE of 1.1 and the Rørvik RBE model were used for the ROWD calculations. RESULTS The SOBP in water had decreasing ROWD with decreasing pO2. In the plans accounting for oxygenation, the median target doses were approximately a factor 1.1 lower than the corresponding plans which did not consider the OER. Hypoxia adapted target ROWDs were considerably more heterogeneous than the RBE1.1-weighted doses. CONCLUSION We realized a Monte Carlo based tool for calculating the ROWD. Read-in of patient pO2 and estimation of ROWD with flexibility in choice of RBE model was achieved, giving a tool that may be useful in future clinical applications of hypoxia-guided particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tordis Johnsen Dahle
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
| | - Espen Rusten
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway; Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Antti Silvoniemi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland; Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Str. Campeggi, 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Fredrik Fjæra
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Eivind Rørvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway; Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Pauliina Wright
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland; Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Camilla Grindeland Boer
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Sarita Forsback
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Minn
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland; Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scholz M. State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects of Ion Beam Therapy: Physical and Radiobiological Aspects. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2935240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
19
|
Konings K, Vandevoorde C, Baselet B, Baatout S, Moreels M. Combination Therapy With Charged Particles and Molecular Targeting: A Promising Avenue to Overcome Radioresistance. Front Oncol 2020; 10:128. [PMID: 32117774 PMCID: PMC7033551 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays a central role in the treatment of cancer patients. Over the past decades, remarkable technological progress has been made in the field of conventional radiotherapy. In addition, the use of charged particles (e.g., protons and carbon ions) makes it possible to further improve dose deposition to the tumor, while sparing the surrounding healthy tissues. Despite these improvements, radioresistance and tumor recurrence are still observed. Although the mechanisms underlying resistance to conventional radiotherapy are well-studied, scientific evidence on the impact of charged particle therapy on cancer cell radioresistance is restricted. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential role that charged particles could play to overcome radioresistance. This review will focus on hypoxia, cancer stem cells, and specific signaling pathways of EGFR, NFκB, and Hedgehog as well as DNA damage signaling involving PARP, as mechanisms of radioresistance for which pharmacological targets have been identified. Finally, new lines of future research will be proposed, with a focus on novel molecular inhibitors that could be used in combination with charged particle therapy as a novel treatment option for radioresistant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrien Konings
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Department of Nuclear Medicine, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Bjorn Baselet
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Sarah Baatout
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Mol, Belgium.,Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marjan Moreels
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Mol, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mizushima K, Iwata Y, Muramatsu M, Lee SH, Shirai T. Experimental study on monitoring system of clinical beam purity in multiple-ion beam operation for heavy-ion radiotherapy. THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 2020; 91:023309. [PMID: 32113412 DOI: 10.1063/1.5127537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute of Radiological Sciences has investigated multiple-ion therapy using energetic beams of helium, carbon, oxygen, and neon ions, to improve treatment outcomes of refractory cancer. For this therapy, it is necessary to ensure the helium-ion beam purity to avoid irradiation by unwanted ions. Here, we develop a measurement method for monitoring beam purity. This method can measure the charge number of the ions in a high-purity beam using an ionization chamber and Faraday cup. In addition, it can be used to detect the contamination of the clinical helium-ion beam. We perform beam experiments to evaluate our beam-purity monitoring method and predict that our method is capable of detecting contamination below 1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Mizushima
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Y Iwata
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - M Muramatsu
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - S H Lee
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - T Shirai
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rezaee L. Optimization of treatment planning for hypoxic tumours and re-modulation of radiation intensity in heavy-ion radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:68-78. [PMID: 31889925 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The purpose of this study is to optimize treatment planning in carbon ion radiotherapy, taking into account the effect of tumour hypoxia. Background In conventional hadron therapy, the goal is to create a homogenous dose in the tumour area and, thus, achieve a uniform cell survival level. Since the induction of a specific damage to cells is directly influenced by the level of hypoxia in the tissue, the varying oxygen pressure in the different regions of hypoxic tumours would disrupt the uniformity of the cell survival level. Materials and methods Using the Geant4 Monte Carlo Code, the physical dose profile and dose-averaged linear energy transfer were calculated in the tumour. Then, the oxygen enhancement ratio in different areas of the tumour were compared with different pressures. Results Modulations of radiation intensities as well as energies of ion beams were calculated, both considering and disregarding the effect of hypoxia, and the required dose profiles were compared with each other. Cell survival levels were also compared between the two methods. An equation was obtained for re-modulating the beams in the presence of hypoxia, and radiation weighting factors were extracted for the beam intensities. Conclusion The results show that taking the effect of hypoxia into account would cause the reduction of average doses delivered to the tumour tissues up to 1.54 times. In this regard, the required dose is reduced by 1.63 times in the healthy tissues before the tumour. This will result in an effective protection of healthy tissues around the tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ladan Rezaee
- Department of Physics, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thariat J, Valable S, Laurent C, Haghdoost S, Pérès EA, Bernaudin M, Sichel F, Lesueur P, Césaire M, Petit E, Ferré AE, Saintigny Y, Skog S, Tudor M, Gérard M, Thureau S, Habrand JL, Balosso J, Chevalier F. Hadrontherapy Interactions in Molecular and Cellular Biology. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 21:E133. [PMID: 31878191 PMCID: PMC6981652 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The resistance of cancer cells to radiotherapy is a major issue in the curative treatment of cancer patients. This resistance can be intrinsic or acquired after irradiation and has various definitions, depending on the endpoint that is chosen in assessing the response to radiation. This phenomenon might be strengthened by the radiosensitivity of surrounding healthy tissues. Sensitive organs near the tumor that is to be treated can be affected by direct irradiation or experience nontargeted reactions, leading to early or late effects that disrupt the quality of life of patients. For several decades, new modalities of irradiation that involve accelerated particles have been available, such as proton therapy and carbon therapy, raising the possibility of specifically targeting the tumor volume. The goal of this review is to examine the up-to-date radiobiological and clinical aspects of hadrontherapy, a discipline that is maturing, with promising applications. We first describe the physical and biological advantages of particles and their application in cancer treatment. The contribution of the microenvironment and surrounding healthy tissues to tumor radioresistance is then discussed, in relation to imaging and accurate visualization of potentially resistant hypoxic areas using dedicated markers, to identify patients and tumors that could benefit from hadrontherapy over conventional irradiation. Finally, we consider combined treatment strategies to improve the particle therapy of radioresistant cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN-UMR6534-Unicaen-Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France;
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Samuel Valable
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Carine Laurent
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Siamak Haghdoost
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Elodie A. Pérès
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Myriam Bernaudin
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - François Sichel
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Paul Lesueur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Mathieu Césaire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Edwige Petit
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Aurélie E. Ferré
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Yannick Saintigny
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Sven Skog
- Sino-Swed Molecular Bio-Medicine Research Institute, Shenzhen 518057, China;
| | - Mihaela Tudor
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-63, 077125 Magurele, Romania
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91-95, R-050095 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Michael Gérard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Sebastien Thureau
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN-UMR6534-Unicaen-Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - François Chevalier
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Blakely EA, Faddegon B, Tinkle C, Bloch C, Dominello M, Griffin RJ, Joiner MC, Burmeister J. Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: The United States needs at least one carbon ion facility. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:6-13. [PMID: 31573146 PMCID: PMC6839391 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruce Faddegon
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of California – San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Christopher Tinkle
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisTNUSA
| | - Charles Bloch
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Michael Dominello
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Robert J Griffin
- Department of OncologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle RockARUSA
| | - Michael C Joiner
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA,Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sokol O, Krämer M, Hild S, Durante M, Scifoni E. Kill painting of hypoxic tumors with multiple ion beams. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:045008. [PMID: 30641490 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aafe40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
We report on a novel method for simultaneous biological optimization of treatment plans for hypoxic tumors using multiple ion species. Our previously introduced kill painting approach, where the overall cell killing is optimized on biologically heterogeneous targets, was expanded with the capability of handling different ion beams simultaneously. The current version (MIBO) of the research treatment planning system TRiP98 has now been augmented to handle 3D (voxel-by-voxel) target oxygenation data. We present a case of idealized geometries where this method can identify optimal combinations leading to an improved peak-to-entrance effective dose ratio. This is achieved by the redistribution of particle fluences, when the heavier ions are preferentially forwarded to hypoxic target areas, while the lighter ions deliver the remaining dose to its normoxic regions. Finally, we present an in silico skull base chordoma patient case study with a combination of 4He and 16O beams, demonstrating specific indications for its potential clinical application. In this particular case, the mean dose, received by the brainstem, was reduced by 3%-5% and by 10%-12% as compared to the pure 4He and 16O plans, respectively. The new method allows a full biological optimization of different ion beams, exploiting the capabilities of actively scanned ion beams of modern particle therapy centers. The possible experimental verification of the present approach at ion beam facilities disposing of fast ion switch is presented and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Sokol
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Planckstraße 1, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fossati P, Matsufuji N, Kamada T, Karger CP. Radiobiological issues in prospective carbon ion therapy trials. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1096-e1110. [PMID: 30421806 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is developing toward a versatile tool in radiotherapy; however, the increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ions in tumors and normal tissues with respect to photon irradiation has to be considered by mathematical models in treatment planning. As a consequence, dose prescription and definition of dose constraints are performed in terms of RBE weighted rather than absorbed dose. The RBE is a complex quantity, which depends on physical variables, such as dose and beam quality as well as on normal tissue- or tumor-specific factors. At present, three RBE models are employed in CIRT: (a) the mixed-beam model, (b) the Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MKM), and (c) the local effect model. While the LEM is used in Europe, the other two models are employed in Japan, and unfortunately, the concepts of how the nominal RBE-weighted dose is determined and prescribed differ significantly between the European and Japanese centers complicating the comparison, transfer, and reproduction of clinical results. This has severe impact on the way treatments should be prescribed, recorded, and reported. This contribution reviews the concept of the clinical application of the different RBE models and the ongoing clinical CIRT trials in Japan and Europe. Limitations of the RBE models and the resulting radiobiological issues in clinical CIRT trials are discussed in the context of current clinical evidence and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Fossati
- Fondazione CNAO (Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica), Pavia, Italy.,European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Tadashi Kamada
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schuemann J, Bassler N, Inaniwa T. Computational models and tools. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1073-e1085. [PMID: 30421814 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In this chapter, we describe two different methods, analytical (pencil beam) algorithms and Monte Carlo simulations, used to obtain the intended dose distributions in patients and evaluate their strengths and shortcomings. We discuss the difference between the prescribed physical dose and the biologically effective dose, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) between ions and photons and the dependence of RBE on the linear energy transfer (LET). Lastly, we show how LET- or RBE-based optimization can be used to improve treatment plans and explore how the availability of multimodality ion beam facilities can be used to design a tumor-specific optimal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Schuemann
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Niels Bassler
- Medical Radiation Physics, Dept. of Physics, Stockholm University, Sweden
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, QST, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grau C, Høyer M, Poulsen PR, Muren LP, Korreman SS, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC, Alsner J, Overgaard J. Rethink radiotherapy - BIGART 2017. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1341-1352. [PMID: 29148908 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1371326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Ludvig Paul Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mohan R, Peeler CR, Guan F, Bronk L, Cao W, Grosshans DR. Radiobiological issues in proton therapy. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1367-1373. [PMID: 28826292 PMCID: PMC5842809 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1348621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for particle therapy is a complex function of particle type, radiation dose, linear energy transfer (LET), cell type, endpoint, etc. In the clinical practice of proton therapy, the RBE is assumed to have a fixed value of 1.1. This assumption, along with the effects of physical uncertainties, may mean that the biologically effective dose distributions received by the patient may be significantly different from what is seen on treatment plans. This may contribute to unforeseen toxicities and/or failure to control the disease. Variability of Proton RBE: It has been shown experimentally that proton RBE varies significantly along the beam path, especially near the end of the particle range. While there is now an increasing acceptance that proton RBE is variable, there is an ongoing debate about whether to change the current clinical practice. Clinical Evidence: A rationale against the change is the uncertainty in the models of variable RBE. Secondly, so far there is no clear clinical evidence of the harm of assuming proton RBE to be 1.1. It is conceivable, however, that the evidence is masked partially by physical uncertainties. It is, therefore, plausible that reduction in uncertainties and their incorporation in the estimation of dose actually delivered may isolate and reveal the variability of RBE in clinical practice. Nevertheless, clinical evidence of RBE variability is slowly emerging as more patients are treated with protons and their response data are analyzed. Modelling and Incorporation of RBE in the Optimization of Proton Therapy: The improvement in the knowledge of RBE could lead to better understanding of outcomes of proton therapy and in the improvement of models to predict RBE. Prospectively, the incorporation of such models in the optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy could lead to improvements in the therapeutic ratio of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhe Mohan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Lawrence Bronk
- Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wenhua Cao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David R. Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Inaniwa T, Kanematsu N, Noda K, Kamada T. Treatment planning of intensity modulated composite particle therapy with dose and linear energy transfer optimization. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:5180-5197. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa68d7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
30
|
Rørvik E, Thörnqvist S, Stokkevåg CH, Dahle TJ, Fjaera LF, Ytre-Hauge KS. A phenomenological biological dose model for proton therapy based on linear energy transfer spectra. Med Phys 2017; 44:2586-2594. [PMID: 28295379 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2016] [Revised: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons varies with the radiation quality, quantified by the linear energy transfer (LET). Most phenomenological models employ a linear dependency of the dose-averaged LET (LETd ) to calculate the biological dose. However, several experiments have indicated a possible non-linear trend. Our aim was to investigate if biological dose models including non-linear LET dependencies should be considered, by introducing a LET spectrum based dose model. METHOD The RBE-LET relationship was investigated by fitting of polynomials from 1st to 5th degree to a database of 85 data points from aerobic in vitro experiments. We included both unweighted and weighted regression, the latter taking into account experimental uncertainties. Statistical testing was performed to decide whether higher degree polynomials provided better fits to the data as compared to lower degrees. The newly developed models were compared to three published LETd based models for a simulated spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) scenario. RESULTS The statistical analysis of the weighted regression analysis favored a non-linear RBE-LET relationship, with the quartic polynomial found to best represent the experimental data (P = 0.010). The results of the unweighted regression analysis were on the borderline of statistical significance for non-linear functions (P = 0.053), and with the current database a linear dependency could not be rejected. For the SOBP scenario, the weighted non-linear model estimated a similar mean RBE value (1.14) compared to the three established models (1.13-1.17). The unweighted model calculated a considerably higher RBE value (1.22). CONCLUSION The analysis indicated that non-linear models could give a better representation of the RBE-LET relationship. However, this is not decisive, as inclusion of the experimental uncertainties in the regression analysis had a significant impact on the determination and ranking of the models. As differences between the models were observed for the SOBP scenario, both non-linear LET spectrum- and linear LETd based models should be further evaluated in clinically realistic scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eivind Rørvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sara Thörnqvist
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Camilla H Stokkevåg
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Tordis J Dahle
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Fredrik Fjaera
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Grau C, Overgaard J, Høyer M, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC, Muren LP. Biology-guided adaptive radiotherapy (BiGART) is progressing towards clinical reality. Acta Oncol 2015; 54:1245-50. [PMID: 26390238 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1076992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- b Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Kari Tanderup
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
- c Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | | | - Ludvig Paul Muren
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
- c Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|