Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission

Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion

The cochlea's wave-based signal processing allows it to efficiently decompose a complex acoustic waveform into frequency components. Because cochlear responses are nonlinear, the waves arising from one frequency component of a complex sound can be altered by the presence of others that overlap with it in time and space (e.g., two-tone suppression). Here, we investigate the suppression of basilar-membrane (BM) velocity responses to a transient signal (a test click) by another click or tone. We show that the BM response to the click can be reduced when the stimulus is shortly preceded or followed by another (suppressor) click. More surprisingly, the data reveal two curious dependencies on the interclick interval, Δt. First, the temporal suppression curve (amount of suppression vs. Δt) manifests a pronounced and nearly periodic microstructure. Second, temporal suppression is generally strongest not when the two clicks are presented simultaneously (Δt = 0), but when the suppressor click precedes the test click by a time interval corresponding to one to two periods of the best frequency (BF) at the measurement location. By systematically varying the phase of the suppressor click, we demonstrate that the suppression microstructure arises from alternating constructive and destructive interference between the BM responses to the two clicks. And by comparing temporal and tonal suppression in the same animals, we test the hypothesis that the asymmetry of the temporal-suppression curve around Δt = 0 stems from cochlear dispersion and the well-known asymmetry of tonal suppression around the BF. Just as for two-tone suppression, BM responses to clicks are most suppressed by tones at frequencies just above the BF of the measurement location. On average, the frequency place of maximal suppressibility of the click response predicted from temporal-suppression data agrees with the frequency at which tonal suppression peaks, consistent with our hypothesis.

Evaluation of Inner Ear Damage by Using Otoacoustic Emissions in Patients Who Underwent Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty Operations in the Early Period

Objective

We aim to demonstrate inner ear damage caused by drilling in the early period. Healthy contralateral ears of patients who underwent mastoidectomy using drill or tympanoplasty without using drill were compared.

Methods

A total of 38 patients (mastoidectomy: 22, tympanoplasty: 16) who were diagnosed as chronic otitis media and were scheduled for surgery were included. Distortion product (dp) otoacoustic emissions measurements were performed on healthy contralateral ears of patients on pre- and post-operative 1. hour, 1. day, 2. day, 3. day, and 4. day.

Results

In mastoidectomy group, dp otoacoustic emission values on post-operative 1. hour, 1. day, 2. day, 3. day, and 4. day at a frequency of 4000 Hz were significantly lower than in tympanoplasty group (p<0.05). In mastoidectomy group, dp values on post-operative 1. hour, 1. day, 2. day, 3. day, and 4. day at 4000 Hz significantly decreased in comparison with pre-operative period (p<0.05). In comparison with pre-operative period, decrease in dp values on post-operative 1. hour, 1. day, and 2. day at 4000 Hz in mastoidectomy group is significantly higher than those in tympanoplasty group (p<0.05). In tympanoplasty group, dp values on post-operative 1. hour at 4000 Hz significantly decreased in comparison with pre-operative period (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Drilling used in mastoidectomy operation damage healthy contralateral ears by causing acoustic trauma. This damage can be determined by otoacoustic emissions in the early period. According to our study, hearing loss is temporary and more distinct at higher frequencies.

Simultaneous suppression of tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions: Two and three-tone burst combinations

Previous investigations have shown that components of a tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) evoked by a 1 kHz tone burst (TB1) can be suppressed by the simultaneous presence of a 2 kHz tone burst (TB2) or a pair of tone bursts at 2 and 3 kHz (TB2 and TB3 respectively). No previous study has measured this "simultaneous suppression of TBOAEs" for both TB2 alone and TB2 and TB3 from the same ears, so that the effect of the additional presence of TB3 on suppression caused by TB2 is not known. In simple terms, three outcomes are possible; suppression increases, suppression is reduced or suppression is not affected. Comparison of previously reported simultaneous suppression data suggests TB3 causes a reduction in suppression, though it is not clear if this is a genuine effect or simply reflects methodological and ear differences between studies. This issue has implications for previously proposed mechanisms of simultaneous suppression of TBOAEs and the interpretation of clinical data, and is clarified by the present study. Simultaneous suppression of TBOAEs was measured for TB1 and TB2 as well as TB1, TB2 and TB3 at 50, 60 and 70 dB p.e. SPL from nine normal human ears. Results showed no significant difference between mean suppression obtained for the two and three-tone burst combinations, indicating the reduction of suppression inferred from comparison of previous data is likely a result of methodological and ear differences rather than a genuine effect.

Further tests of the local nonlinear interaction-based mechanism for simultaneous suppression of tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions

Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) components measured in response to a 1 kHz tone burst (TB1) are suppressed by the simultaneous presence of an additional tone burst (TB2). This "simultaneous suppression of TBOAEs" has been explained in terms of a mechanism based on local nonlinear interactions between the basilar membrane (BM) travelling waves caused by TB1 and TB2. A test of this local nonlinear interaction (LNI)-based mechanism, as a function of the frequency separation (Δf, expressed in kHz) between TB1 and TB2, has previously been reported by Killan et al. (2012) using a simple mathematical model [Killan et al., Hear. Res. 285, 58-64 (2012)]. The two experiments described in this paper add additional data on the extent to which the LNI-based mechanism can account for simultaneous suppression, by testing two further hypotheses derived from the model predictions. Experiment I tested the hypothesis that TBOAE suppression is directly linked to TBOAE amplitude nonlinearity where ears that exhibit a higher degree of amplitude nonlinearity yield greater suppression than more linear ears, and this relationship varies systematically as a function of Δf. In order to test this hypothesis simultaneous suppression at a range of values of Δf at 60 dB peak-equivalent sound pressure level (p.e. SPL) and TBOAE amplitude nonlinearity from normal human ears was measured. In Experiment II the hypothesis that suppression will also increase progressively as a function of increasing tone burst level was tested by measuring suppression for a range of Δf and tone burst levels at 40, 50, 60 and 70 dB p.e. SPL. The majority of the findings from both experiments provide support for the LNI-based mechanism being primarily responsible for simultaneous suppression. However, some data were inconsistent with this view. Specifically, a breakdown in the relationship between suppression and TBOAE amplitude nonlinearity at Δf = 1 (i.e. when TB2 was reasonably well separated from, and had a higher frequency than TB1) and unexpected level-dependence, most notably at Δf = 1, but also where Δf = -0.5, was observed. Either the LNI model is too simple or an alternative explanation, involving response components generated at basal regions of the basilar membrane, is required to account for these findings.

Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components

The presence of short-latency (SL), less compressive-growing components in bandpass-filtered transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) waveforms may implicate contributions from cochlear regions basal to the tonotopic place. Recent empirical work suggests a region of SL generation between ∼1/5 and 1/10-octave basal to the TEOAE frequency's tonotopic place. However, this estimate may be biased to regions closer to the tonotopic place as the TEOAE extraction technique precluded measurement of components with latencies shorter than ∼5 ms. Using a variant of the non-linear, double-evoked extraction paradigm that permitted extraction of components with latencies as early as 1 ms, the current study empirically estimated the spatial-extent of the cochlear region contributing to 2 kHz SL TEOAE components. TEOAEs were evoked during simultaneous presentation of a suppressor stimulus, in order to suppress contributions to the TEOAE from different places along the cochlear partition. Three or four different-latency components of similar frequency content (∼2 kHz) were identified for most subjects. Component latencies ranged from 1.4 to 9.6 ms; latency was predictive of the component's growth rate and the suppressor frequency to which the component's magnitude was most sensitive to change. As component latency decreased, growth became less compressive and suppressor-frequency sensitivity shifted to higher frequencies. The shortest-latency components were most sensitive to suppressors approximately 3/5-octave higher than their nominal frequency of 2 kHz. These results are consistent with a distributed region of generation extending to approximately 3/5-octave basal to the TEOAE frequency's tonotopic place. The empirical estimates of TEOAE generation are similar to model-based estimates where generation of the different-latency components occurs through linear reflection from impedance discontinuities distributed across the cochlear partition.

Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas

It has been suggested that the tuning of the cochlear filters can be derived from measures of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Two approaches have been proposed to estimate cochlear frequency selectivity using OAEs evoked with a single tone (stimulus-frequency (SF)) OAEs: based on SFOAE group delays (SF-GDs) and on SFOAE suppression tuning curves (SF-STCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether either SF-GDs or SF-STCs obtained with low probe levels (30 dB SPL) correlate with more direct measures of cochlear tuning (compound action potential suppression tuning curves (CAP-STCs)) in chinchillas. The SFOAE-based estimates of tuning covaried with CAP-STCs tuning for >3 kHz probe frequencies, indicating that these measures are related to cochlear frequency selectivity. However, the relationship may be too weak to predict tuning with either SFOAE method in an individual. The SF-GD prediction of tuning was sharper than CAP-STC tuning. On the other hand, SF-STCs were consistently broader than CAP-STCs implying that SFOAEs may have less restricted region of generation in the cochlea than CAPs. Inclusion of <3 kHz data in a statistical model resulted in no significant or borderline significant covariation among the three methods: neither SFOAE test appears to reliably estimate an individual's CAP-STC tuning at low-frequencies. At the group level, SF-GDs and CAP-STCs showed similar tuning at low frequencies, while SF-STCs were over five times broader than the CAP-STCs indicating that low-frequency SFOAE may originate over a very broad region of the cochlea extending ≥5 mm basal to the tonotopic place of the probe.

A mechanism for simultaneous suppression of tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions

Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emission (TBOAE) components in response to a 1 kHz tone burst are suppressed by the simultaneous presence of tone bursts at higher frequencies. To date, the underlying cause of this "simultaneous suppression" of TBOAEs is unclear. This paper describes a potential mechanism based on local nonlinear interactions between basilar membrane (BM) travelling waves, and tests the extent to which it is able to account for this specific suppression phenomenon. A simple mathematical model based on local nonlinear interactions was developed, and its predictions for a range of tone burst pairs were compared to corresponding TBOAE suppression data recorded from fourteen normally hearing human ears at a level of 60 dB p.e. SPL. Model predictions and mean TBOAE suppression data showed close agreement for all pairs of tone bursts. These results suggest that simultaneous suppression of TBOAEs can be explained solely in terms of the local nonlinear interaction-based mechanism. However, the involvement of other mechanisms, involving components generated at places basal to their characteristic place along the BM, cannot be excluded.

Temporal suppression of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission level-curve

The click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) level-curve grows linearly for clicks below 40-60 dB and saturates for higher inputs. This study investigates dynamic (i.e., time-dependent) features of the CEOAE level-curve by presenting a suppressor-click less than 8 ms before the test-click. An alteration of the CEOAE level-curve, designated here as temporal suppression, was observed within this time period, and was shown to depend on the levels and the temporal separation of the two clicks. Temporal suppression occurred for all four subjects tested, and resulted in a vertical offset from the unsuppressed level-curve for test-click levels greater than 50 dB peak-equivalent level (peSPL). Temporal suppression was greatest for suppressors presented 1-4 ms before the test click, and the magnitude and time scale of the effect were subject dependent. Temporal suppression was furthermore observed for the short- (i.e., 6-18 ms) and long-latency (i.e., 24-36 ms) regions of the CEOAE, indicating that temporal suppression similarly affects synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs) and purely evoked CEOAE components. Overall, this study demonstrates that temporal suppression of the CEOAE level-curve reflects a dynamic process in human cochlear processing that works on a time scale of 0-10 ms.

High-frequency transient evoked otoacoustic emissions acquisition with auditory canal compensated clicks using swept-tone analysis

The meatus (auditory canal) plays a role in altering the waveform of incident sound, distorting time- and frequency-domain characteristics. Often in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) recording protocols, a 75 mus click is utilized to elicit a click-evoked response. TEOAEs are recorded by a probe microphone placed in the meatus and last for about 20 ms. Time-domain ringing in the meatal response (MR) creates a stimulus artifact that lasts up to 5+ ms, obscuring early-latency TEOAEs. This research is motivated by the need for a real-time, ear and probe placement dependent method for minimizing the magnitude and phase distortions of the meatus. The MR is first obtained using swept-tone analysis, from which a compensated stimulus is created. Usage of a compensated click from normally hearing adult subjects show an improvement to the flatness of the magnitude response and linearization of the phase response. Furthermore, a reduction in effective duration of the MR is found, attenuating the meatal artifact for click stimuli. The high frequency TEOAE content found in the early latencies of the response that is typically obscured by the MR artifact is revealed with the use of a compensated click.

Temporal suppression and augmentation of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions

This study investigates temporal suppression of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), occurring when a suppressor-click is presented close in time to a test-click (e.g. 0-8ms). Various temporal suppression methods for examining temporal changes in cochlear compression were evaluated and measured here for seven subjects, both for short- and long-latency CEOAEs. Long-latency CEOAEs (duration >20ms) typically indicate the presence of synchronised spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs). Temporal suppression can only be linked to changes in CEOAE-compression if the suppressor-click affects the CEOAE magnitude. Phase changes induced by the suppressor-click were shown to bias suppression in two ways: (i) when a specific asymmetric measurement method was used and (ii) when synchronisation between the CEOAE and the click-stimuli was incomplete. When such biases were eliminated, temporal suppression and augmentation (the opposite effect) were observed and shown to be subject-dependent. This indicates that the nonlinearity underlying temporal suppression can work in a more (i.e., suppressed) or less (i.e., augmented) compressive state, depending on the inter-click interval and the subject under test. Temporal suppression was shown to be comparable for CEOAEs and SSOAEs, indicating similar underlying cochlear nonlinear mechanisms. This study contributes to a better understanding of the temporal properties of cochlear dynamics.

Temporal suppression of long-latency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions

A comprehensive set of results from double click suppression experiments on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have been presented by Hine and Thornton [1] and Kapadia and Lutman [2]. They found that suppression of a click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) varied with the timing and level of a suppressor-click presented close in time to the test-click. Maximal suppression was found when the suppressor-click led the test-click by 2-4 ms. The double click suppression experiment set out by Hine and Thornton was repeated here and the analysis extended to the 'long-latency' CEOAE (duration > 20 ms) whereas previous studies only focused on the 'short-latency' CEOAE (duration < 20 ms). The hypothesis was that suppression would continue over the long-latency CEOAE since this region is probably dominated by spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs) synchronising with the click stimulus. The results for two exemplary subjects showed that the nonlinear suppression effect remained on the long-latency CEOAE, indicating that both SOAEs and CEOAEs originate from the same cochlear nonlinearities, as earlier suggested by Kemp and Chum [3]. The apparent similar origin of both types of emissions implies that the same temporal effects influence their responses.

Origin of suppression of otoacoustic emissions evoked by two-tone bursts

Otoacoustic emission (OAE) data recorded for tone bursts presented separately and as a two-tone burst complex, that had been reported previously [Yoshikawa, H., Smurzynski, J., Probst R., 2000. Suppression of tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in relation to frequency separation. Hear. Res. 148, 95-106], were re-processed using the method of adaptive approximations by matching pursuit (MP). Two types of stimuli were applied to record tone burst OAEs (TBOAEs): (a) cosine-windowed tone bursts of 5-ms duration with center frequencies of 1, 1.5, 2 and 3kHz, (b) complex stimuli consisting of a digital addition of the 1-kHz tone burst together with either the 1.5-, 2- or 3-kHz tone burst. The MP method allowed decomposition of signals into waveforms of defined frequency, latency, time span, and amplitude. This approach provided a high time-frequency (t-f) resolution and identified patterns of resonance modes that were characteristic for TBOAEs recorded in each individual ear. Individual responses to single-tone bursts were processed off-line to form 'sum of singles' responses. The results confirmed linear superposition behavior for a frequency separation of two-tone bursts of 2kHz (the 1-kHz and 3-kHz condition). For the 1, 1.5-kHz condition, the MP results revealed the existence of closely positioned resonance modes associated with responses recorded individually with the stimuli differing in frequency by 500Hz. Then, the differences between t-f distributions calculated for dual (two-tone bursts) and sum-of-singles conditions exhibited mutual suppression of resonance modes common to both stimuli. The degree of attenuation depended on the individual pattern of characteristic resonance modes, i.e., suppression occurred when two resonant modes excited by both stimuli overlapped. It was postulated that the suppression observed in case of dual stimuli with closely-spaced components is due to mutual attenuation of the overlapping resonance modes.

An investigation into the relationship between input–output nonlinearities and rate-induced nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences

The maximum length sequence (MLS) technique allows otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) to be recorded using clicks presented at very high presentation rates. It has previously been found that increasing the click presentation rate leads to increasing suppression (termed "rate-suppression") of the MLS evoked OAE (Hine, J.E., Thornton, A.R.D., 1997. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences as a function of stimulus rate and level. Ear Hear. 18, 121-128). It has been suggested that the source of rate-suppression arises from the same nonlinear processes that give rise to the well-known nonlinear growth of OAEs. Based on this assumption, a simple model of rate-suppression (Kapadia, S., Lutman, M.E., 2001. Static input-output nonlinearity as the source of nonlinear effects in maximum length sequence click-evoked OAEs. Br. J. Audiol. 35, 103-112) predicts that both input-output (I/O) nonlinearity and rate-suppression can be unified by characterising the stimulus in terms of its acoustic power which, at high rates, is proportional to the click presentation rate. The objective of this study was to test this simple model by recording MLS OAEs from a group of normally hearing adults over a range of stimulus rates from 40 to 5000 clicks/s, and of stimulus levels from 45 to 70dB peSPL. The results are broadly in agreement with the predictions from the model, though there appears to be some tendency for the model to slightly overestimate the degree of rate-suppression for a given degree of I/O nonlinearity. It is also suggested that the model may break down more significantly in the presence of spontaneous OAEs.

Dynamic nonlinear cochlear model predictions of click-evoked otoacoustic emission suppression

A comprehensive set of results from 2-click suppression experiments on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have been presented by Kapadia and Lutman [Kapadia, S., Lutman, M.E., 2000a. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry. Hear. Res. 146, 89-100]. They found that the degree of suppression of an OAE evoked by a test click varied systematically with the timing and the level of a suppressor click, being greatest for suppressor clicks occurring some time before the test click, particularly at lower levels of suppression. Kapadia and Lutman also showed that although the general shape of the graph of suppression against suppressor click timing could be predicted by a static power law model, this did not predict the asymmetry with respect to the timing of the suppressor click. A generalised automatic gain control (AGC) is presented as a simple example of a dynamic nonlinear system. Its steady state nonlinear behaviour, as quantified by its level curve, and its dynamic behaviour, as quantified by its transient response, can be independently set by the feedback gain law and detector time constant, respectively. The previously reported suppression results, with the asymmetry in the timing, are found to be predicted better by such an AGC having a level curve with a slope of about 0.5 dB/dB, and a detector time constant of about twice the period at the characteristic frequency. Although this gives adequate predictions for high suppression levels, it under predicts the suppression and the asymmetry for lower levels. Further research is required to establish whether simple peripheral feedback models can explain OAE suppression of this type.

The effect of suppression on the periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions: experimental data

In a companion paper [Lineton and Lutman, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 859-870 (2003)], changes in the spectral period of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) during self-suppression and two-tone suppression were simulated using a nonlinear cochlear model based on the distributed roughness theory of otoacoustic emission generation [Zweig and Shera, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2018-2047 (1995)1. The current paper presents the results of an experimental investigation of SFOAE suppression obtained from 20 human subjects. It was found that, in most subjects, the spectral period increased during self-suppression, but reduced during high-side two-tone suppression. This pattern of results is in close agreement with the predictions of the cochlear model, and therefore strongly supports the distributed roughness theory of Zweig and Shera. In addition, the results suggest that the SFOAE spectral period is sensitive to changes in the state of the cochlear amplifier.

Transient emission suppression tuning curve attributes in relation to psychoacoustic threshold

Ipsilateral suppression characteristics of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are described in relation to psychoacoustic threshold at 4000 Hz and the presence or absence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in 41 adults with normal hearing. TEOAE amplitudes were measured in response to 4000-Hz tonebursts presented in linear blocks at 40 and 50 dB SPL while puretone suppressors were introduced at a variety of frequencies and levels ipsilateral to and simultaneously with the tonebursts. Suppressors close to the toneburst frequency were most effective in decreasing the amplitude of the TEOAEs, while those more remote in frequency required significantly greater intensity for a similar amount of suppression. Consequently, characteristic tuning curve shapes were obtained. Tuning-curve tip levels were closely associated with the level of the toneburst and tip frequencies occurred at or above the toneburst frequency. Tuning-curve widths (Q10), however, varied significantly across subjects with similar psychoacoustic thresholds in quiet determined by a two-alternative forced-choice method. The results suggest that a portion of that variability may be explained by the presence or absence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in an individual ear.

Temporal nonlinearity revealed by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded to trains of multiple clicks

A series of detailed experiments is described that investigates how a transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) recorded to one-click stimulus is affected by the presence of a variable number of preceding clicks presented over a range of interclick intervals (ICIs). Part of the rationale was to determine if the resulting nonlinear temporal interactions could help explain the amplitude reduction seen when TEOAEs are recorded at very high click rates, as when using maximum length sequence stimulation. Amongst the findings was that the presence of a preceding train of clicks could either suppress or enhance emission amplitude, depending on the number of clicks in the train and the ICI. Results also indicated that the duration of the click trains, rather than the ICI, was the important factor in yielding the most suppressed response and that this seemed to depend on stimulus level. The results recorded at two levels also suggested that the cochlear temporal nonlinearity being monitored was in part related to the nonlinear process that determines the compressive input/output function for stimulus level. It is hypothesised that nonlinear temporal overlap of vibration patterns on the basilar membrane may underlie much of the pattern of results.

Static input-output non-linearity as the source of non-linear effects in maximum length sequence click-evoked OAEs

The application of the maximum length sequence (MLS) technique to the recording of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) allows for a reduction in test time by one to two orders of magnitude. This is because the technique permits the use of extremely high click rates, as inter-click intervals are not constrained to be greater than the duration of the response. However, increasing the click rate also causes a progressive reduction in amplitude, or 'suppression', of the CEOAE. The origin of this suppression is unclear, with diverse suggestions in the literature as to its nature and mechanism. This paper presents a simple model of the well-known compressive non-linearity of the CEOAE level function, based on a static amplitude non-linearity within each of a number of narrowband frequency channels. The response of the model to MLS stimulation demonstrates suppression broadly of the form and magnitude previously reported in experimental studies. Furthermore, the model exhibits the generation of additional non-linear components that have been speculated on in connection with CEOAE recordings using the MLS technique. It is concluded that the MLS suppression phenomenon is derived largely, if not entirely, from the static non-linearity of the CEOAE level function. The approach to modelling the phenomenon as described here also bears promise for understanding various aspects of non-linearity in MLS-based CEOAE recordings.

Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) are reduced in amplitude by the presentation of 'suppressor' clicks that either closely lead or follow the stimulus ('test') clicks. This suppression of the response represents nonlinear temporal interactions between the test and suppressor clicks and/or the CEOAEs they evoke. There are some discrepancies amongst previous reports of the phenomenon, and the underlying mechanisms are not understood. In particular, it is unclear whether the suppression reported simply reflects the compressive nonlinearity of the CEOAE input-output (I-O) function. This paper presents a simple model of the nonlinear interactions between CEOAEs evoked by two closely-spaced clicks. The model shows that suppression as reported may be entirely derived from CEOAE I-O nonlinearity, in combination with the extended duration of the cochlear responses to click stimuli. It is also shown experimentally that suppression is insensitive to the polarities of test and suppressor clicks, which is consistent with the model based on I-O nonlinearity. A companion paper (Kapadia and Lutman, Hear. Res. 146 (2000)) presents experimental findings from a detailed parametric study of nonlinear temporal interactions in CEOAEs in human subjects with normal hearing. The findings are compared with the pattern of results generated by the above model, in order to assess the role of I-O nonlinearity in these nonlinear interactions.

Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) are reduced in amplitude by the presentation of 'suppressor' clicks that either closely lead or follow the stimulus ('test') clicks. A model described in a companion paper (Kapadia and Lutman, Hear. Res. 146 (2000) 89-100) shows that such nonlinear temporal interactions, as previously reported, may be explained in terms of the compressive non-linearity of the CEOAE input-output (I-O) function. This paper presents the results of a detailed parametric investigation into such nonlinear interactions, studied in 12 normal adult ears over a wide range of test and suppressor click levels and inter-click intervals. The results differ from those generated by the model in a number of respects. Principally, maximum suppression is generally obtained for suppressors presented in advance of test clicks, rather than co-incident with the test clicks. The amount of advance depends systematically on the two click levels. The measured suppression can also exceed the theoretical maximum allowed by the model. It is concluded that the nonlinear temporal interactions measured do not simply reflect CEOAE I-O function non-linearity. They may, instead, arise from disturbance of the generator elements from their resting state prior to generation of the CEOAE. These results may also have general implications relating to cochlear responses to transient stimuli and indicate the potential of CEOAEs in probing aspects of cochlear mechanics.

Two-dimensional filter to facilitate detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions

This paper implements a filtering technique to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and, in turn, the detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE's), generated by healthy human cochlea. One can increase the SNR by compiling an image of recorded TEOAE from more than one stimulus intensity, averaged over a few sweeps, which can be further processed by means of two-dimensional spatial mean filters. Averaging some 60 sweeps recorded to stimuli at several intensity levels requires one-forth of the collection time needed for a classical set of responses (average of 260 sweeps), and obtains approximately the same final SNR. The relation between the performances of the proposed technique and the SNR of the rapidly acquired responses before filtering is also investigated.

Effect of contralateral masking on the latency of otoacoustic emissions elicited by acoustic distortion products

Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) are sound products generated by the outer hair cells (OHC) in the inner ear. The OHC are capable of moving spontaneously or in response to acoustic stimuli (spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and evoked otoacoustic emissions), these movements are known as electromotility. Electromotility is affected when contralateral acoustic stimulation is introduced to the ear. Different types of stimuli may produce this response. Clicks, pure tones, and white masking noise have been used as contralateral stimulation. This effect appears to be mediated by the medial efferent olivocochlear bundle. Contralateral masking produces suppression of OAE, especially on the amplitude. However, the effect of contralateral masking on the latency of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) has not been studied. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether contralateral masking, with wide band masking noise, may produce a significant change on the latency of the DPOAE. Three different latency measurements of DPOAE measurements were made on low, middle and high frequencies of fl including 574 Hz, 2454 Hz and 4919 Hz. Each one of these frequencies was measured with and without contralateral masking. Twenty-eight ears of 15 subjects were studied. Non-significant differences (P > 0.05) between masked and unmasked conditions were found in all cases. It is concluded that contralateral masking does not appear to affect latency of DPOAE.

Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig

This study examined the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission obtained in response to a click stimulus presented in combination with a pure tone in the guinea pig. Low-pass filtered click waveforms were digitally generated using a sin(t)/t function windowed over 3 ms with an elevated cosine envelope. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions were obtained using the nonlinear derived response technique. Phase locked pure tones of various frequencies at approximately 70 dB SPL were electrically mixed with electrical clicks, with the pure tone present only for the three lower level stimuli in the train of four stimuli. Enhancement in the amplitude of the response spectrum at frequencies which corresponded to regions of the basilar membrane apical to the tone was observed with the addition of the tone. This finding is inconsistent with the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission being the result of independent generators. It suggests that intermodulation distortion energy may contribute to the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission, the enhancement in the emission response spectrum at frequencies below the pure tone being a result of a complex interaction on the basilar membrane of intermodulation distortion products.

Effect of olivocochlear bundle section on evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences

Presenting clicks according to maximum length sequences (MLS) enables transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) to be recorded at very high stimulation rates. As the click rate is increased from 40 clicks/s up to a maximum rate of 5000 clicks/s there is a reduction in TEOAE amplitude that reaches an approximate asymptote at 1500 clicks/s. One hypothesis put forward to explain this MLS 'rate effect' is that ipsilateral efferent activity is involved. To test this hypothesis TEOAEs were recorded from both ears of five patients who had undergone a unilateral vestibular nerve section--a surgical procedure which also entails sectioning the olivocochlear bundle. TEOAEs were recorded conventionally at 40 clicks/s and using MLS stimulation at 5000 clicks/s. Increasing the rate from 40 to 5000 clicks/s was found to reduce the amplitude of the TEOAEs by equivalent amounts in ears ipsilateral and contralateral to a vestibular nerve section as well as in the ears of normal-hearing adults. Since an ear ipsilateral to a vestibular nerve section should have no efferent innervation the hypothesis that efferent activity is the major mechanism involved in the MLS rate effect is rejected. Instead, the possibility that intracochlear processes are the underlying mechanism will now be investigated.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emission with unexpectedly short latency

Two alternative approaches for studying short-latency click-evoked otoacoustic emission (OAE) in normal-hearing subjects were employed. Growth of a click-evoked "ear canal response" with stimulus increase became progressively more non-linear and saturated when the latency of the analyzed segment of response increased. This relation between latency and shape of the response input/output function was observed even after linear component cancellation, indicating that it could be an intrinsic property of OAE. Hence, the existence of an essentially linear short-latency OAE component which is probably eliminated by commonly used artifact cancellation technique is suggested. Taking into account the fact that transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) may be completely suppressed by simultaneously presented noise, a "true" artifact cancellation was performed by subtracting the ear canal response in the presence of a masker from the conventional click-evoked OAE recording. An additional TEOAE component with a latency of 2.5-5 ms was found. Its growth with stimulus intensity was indeed more linear than that of later components. However, latency and frequency of this TEOAE component, being specific for each subject, can hardly be explained by both a commonly assumed latency-frequency relationship of TEOAE and a generally used estimation of TEOAE latency as the sum of the forward and backward traveling wave propagation times.

Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: role of the medial olivocochlear system

Contralateral sound stimulation produces suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), which is attributed to a reflex activation of the medial olivocochlear system. More pronounced suppression of TEOAE produced by ipsilateral masking could involve efferent-mediated effects along with effects of cochlear origin. However, this has not been investigated so far. Therefore, changes of click-evoked OAE under ipsi- and contralateral forward masking by clicks and noise-bursts were investigated in an extremely long-lasting experiment in one normal-hearing volunteer. The reduction of TEOAE under ipsilateral click-to-click forward masking was maximal during the first milliseconds after masker delivery implying that predominant role of the cochlear processes in TEOAE ipsilateral suppression. Ipsilateral forward masking by noise burst revealed additional TEOAE suppression with longer latency. Its time course was similar to that of the contralateral masking effect. The latter data suggest the involvement of the medial olivocochlear system in TEOAE ipsilateral suppression.