The effect of azathioprine on serum levels of interleukin 6 and soluble interleukin 2 receptor

Effect of immunosuppressive treatment on biomarkers in adult atopic dermatitis patients

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers to objectively measure disease severity and predict therapeutic responses are needed in atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

Primary aim: To identify biomarkers reflecting therapeutic response in patients with AD treated systemically. Secondary aims: (i) To identify a biomarker pattern predicting responsiveness to systemic treatment. (ii) To identify differences in expression of biomarker in filaggrin gene (FLG) mutation carriers vs. non-FLG mutations carriers.

METHODS

Thirty-eight severe AD patients treated with methotrexate or azathioprine participated. Serum levels of a proliferation-inducing ligand, B-cell activating factor of the TNF family, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 17) (TARC (CCl-17)), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), interleukin-1 bèta, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-18, IL-31, interferon gamma, tumour necrosis factor alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monokine induced by interferon gamma (chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9), interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (C-X-C motif chemokine Ligand 10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (chemokine (C-C Motif) ligand 2), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4), regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5), Cutaneous T-cell-attracting chemokine (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 27) (CTACK (CCL-27)), thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-5, interleukin-1 alpha and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor were analysed by ELISA and Luminex. The primary outcomes were differences in mean absolute change of SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) between groups after 12 weeks compared with baseline. Responders to treatment were defined by a SCORAD reduction in ≥50%. Buccal mucosa swabs were collected to determine FLG genotype status.

RESULTS

Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, CTACK, IL-13 and VEGF showed a significant decrease after treatment with methotrexate or azathioprine. However, no decrease in individual cytokine levels was significantly correlated with a change in any of the outcome parameters. In addition, baseline biomarker levels were not significantly different between responders and non-responders, and FLG and non-FLG mutants showed similar biomarker profiles.

CONCLUSION

Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and CTACK were confirmed as potential biomarkers. VEGF and IL-13 have a potential value as well. Biomarkers could not be used to discriminate at baseline between responders and non-responders, or FLG genotype status.

Low circulating soluble interleukin 2 receptor level predicts rapid response in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab

BACKGROUND

Treatment with infliximab induces a rapid therapeutic response in most patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Factors predicting good response are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To study the predictive value of baseline level of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL2R), a marker of lymphocyte activation, on the treatment response.

METHODS

24 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis received intravenous infusions of infliximab at study entry, at two weeks, at six weeks, and at eight week intervals thereafter. Outcome was evaluated at six weeks and 22 weeks. Clinical assessment and standard laboratory tests were made and the DAS28 disease activity score was calculated. Serum sIL2R level at entry was measured by automated immunoassay analyser (Immulite). The mean change in DAS28 score from entry to six weeks and 22 weeks was calculated and related to sIL2R level using baseline adjusted robust regression analysis.

RESULTS

Baseline level of serum sIL2R (mean (SD), 621 (325) U/ml) did not correlate with baseline DAS28 score (r = 0.24 (95% confidence interval, -0.18 to 0.58)). At six weeks DAS28 scores improved, with a mean change of -2.53 (-3.08 to -1.98) (p<0.001). This change was predicted by low baseline sIL2R level (regression coefficient per 100 U/ml: 0.205 (0.003 to 0.407) (p = 0.047)). At 22 weeks the DAS28 scores improved, with a mean change of -2.26 (-2.75 to -1.77) (p<0.001). The change was not predicted by baseline sIL2R level.

CONCLUSIONS

Low baseline sIL2R level may predict a rapid clinical response in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab.

New developments in IL-6 dependent biology and therapy: where do we stand and what are the options?

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a four-helical protein which, on target cells, binds to a specific IL-6-receptor and two molecules of the promiscuous signal transducing protein gp130. Structure-function analysis defined three molecular contact sites between IL-6 and its receptor subunits. Using this information, competitive antagonistic proteins as well as hyperagonistic proteins were developed. Possible therapeutic applications of IL-6 antagonists are in IL-6 dependent haematological disorders (Castleman's disease, POEMS syndrome, multiple myeloma) and bone diseases (Paget's disease, osteoporosis). Designer IL-6 antagonists could suppress inflammatory activity in rheumatic and autoimmune diseases and could prevent secondary amyloidosis. IL-6 antagonists could also prove advantageous in myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris. IL-6 antagonists might slow down development of (mesangioproliferative) glomerulonephritis. On the other hand, hyperagonistic variants of IL-6 have a potential in ex vivo expansion of bone marrow stem cells and as thrombopoietic agents. They might also be developed into drugs to support liver regeneration in vivo and to treat stress-induced cardiac insufficiency.

The role of transsignalling via the agonistic soluble IL-6 receptor in human diseases

The activation of cells that do not express the membrane bound interleukin-6 6 receptor (IL-6R) by IL-6 and the soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) is termed transsignalling. Transsignalling may be an pathogenetic factor in human diseases as diverse as multiple myeloma (MM), Castleman's disease, prostate carcinoma, Crohn's disease, systemic sclerosis, Still's disease, osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases. IL-6 and sIL-6R may directly or indirectly enhance their own production on endothelial or bone marrow stromal cells. Positive feedback autocrine loops thus created in affected organs may either cause or maintain disease progression. In autoimmune or vasculitic disease, the ability of the IL-6/sIL-6R complex to inhibit apoptosis of autoreactive T-cells may be central to the development of tissue specific autoimmunity. The anti-apoptotic effect of the IL-6/sIL-6R complex may be involved in tumour genesis and resistance to chemotherapy. Only in rare cases, where counterregulation has failed, there is a notable systemic effect of IL-6/sIL-6R. Appropriate animal models are necessary to establish the pathogenetic role of the IL-6/sIL-6R complex. A specific treatment option for diseases influenced by the sIL-6R could be based on gp130-Fc, a soluble gp130 (sgp130) linked to the Fc-fragment of IgG1. gp130-Fc has shown efficacy in vivo in animal models of Crohn's disease.

The mechanisms of action of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a review with emphasis on macrophage signal transduction and the induction of proinflammatory cytokines

1. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is probably the most common source of treatable disability. A major problem in modern rheumatology is that the mechanism(s) of action of the currently used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) remain unclear. Many of these drugs entered rheumatology mainly through clinical intuition and have been used for decades. 2. The former T-cell-centered paradigm of rheumatoid inflammation has given way to a model of inflammation highlighting the macrophage and its proinflammatory cytokines. In particular, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) has gained prominence as a central proinflammatory mediator in RA, and antibodies against TNF-alpha have been successfully used in patients with RA. 3. This review will summarize the recent advances in determining the mechanisms of action of the currently used DMARDs, with particular emphasis on their effects on the induction of TNF-alpha and interleukin 1 (IL-1) in mononuclear phagocytes. Although some DMARDs, such as auranofin, antimalarials and tenidap, act as inhibitors of the induction of these cytokines in monocytes or macrophages or both, other drugs, such as methotrexate, D-penicillamine and aurothiomalate, do not seem to affect either TNF-alpha or IL-1. 4. The drugs' effects on proinflammatory cytokine induction are correlated to those on other macrophage responses.

Effects of antirheumatic agents on cytokines

A review of the literature concerning the effects of traditional antirheumatic drugs on cytokines and the cytokine and anticytokine approaches already used in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is presented. Many antirheumatic drugs are capable of cytokine modulation in vitro. Corticosteroids inhibit the transcription of a broad spectrum of genes including those encoding monocyte, T cell-derived cytokines and several hemopoietic growth factors, whereas drugs such as cyclosporin A and D-penicillamine interfere with T cell activation more specifically by suppressing interleukin 2 (IL-2) production. The in vivo effects of drug therapy on cytokines in RA patients are less well established. Gold compounds reduce circulating IL-6 levels and the expression of monocyte-derived cytokines, such as IL-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and IL-6, in the rheumatoid synovium. Decreases in circulating IL-6, soluble IL-2 (sIL-2R), and TNF receptors and in synovial fluid IL-1 levels have been reported with methotrexate. Reductions in circulating IL-6 and sIL-2R concentrations have also been observed with cyclosporin and corticosteroids, whereas azathioprine reduces IL-6 but not sIL-2R. Studies on sulfasalazine are conflicting and the in vivo effects of D-penicillamine and antimalarials have not been studied yet. Interferon gamma therapy is not effective in RA but may prove a useful antifibrotic for systemic sclerosis. Colony stimulating factors improve the granulocytopenia associated with Felty's syndrome or drug toxicities but can induce arthritis flares and should be reserved to treat infectious complications. Promising results are being obtained with selective antagonism of TNF and IL-1 in RA, and combinations of anticytokine strategies with traditional antirheumatic drugs have been already envisaged. These should preferably be based in a broader knowledge of the effects of antirheumatic agents on the cytokine network.

Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels in rheumatoid arthritis: effect of methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine therapy

The aim of this study was to assess the correlations of the serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) concentrations with disease activity parameters and response to treatment with second line drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Sixty-seven patients with active disease completed a 24-week, open, randomized study of methotrexate (MTX) versus sulphasalazine (SSZ) or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Serum sIL-2R levels were evaluated before entry and after 24 weeks by ELISA. Serum sIL-2R were significantly higher in RA patients than in controls (P = 0.0001) and correlated significantly only with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.03) and with Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index (P = 0.01) at study entry. No correlation was found between serum sIL-2R and other laboratory and clinical indices of disease activity. After 24 weeks of treatment no differences in serum sIL-2R in comparison with basal levels were found in either responding or in non-responding patients, although the mean reduction of sIL-2R was more marked in the MTX-treated cohort than in the HCQ and SSZ-treated groups. These data suggest that in RA the measurement of sIL-2R should be used with caution as an isolated index of disease activity and that it is not a useful marker of response to treatment with second line drugs.