Controversies in the management of febrile neutropenic cancer patients

Neutropenia following Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Introduction

The purpose of this retrospective report was to evaluate clinical features associated with profound neutropenia in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who were treated with heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIIC) followed by early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Common clinical denominators for significant neutropenia were analyzed.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study of all available clinical data of six patients with postoperative neutropenia out of a total of 242 was undertaken. All patients underwent cytoreductive surgery, HIIC with mitomycin C (n = 4) or cisplatin (n = 1) and EPIC with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for 4 (n = 1) or 5 (n = 5) days.

Results

All six patients presented with hematologic toxicity of WHO criteria grade 4; four of them died postoperatively. Two of the patients who died, and one who did not die, developed bowel perforations. Five patients had prior chemotherapy with 5-FU; three of them had toxic side effects. All patients were overweight, and three patients were anemic preoperatively. The neutropenia presented with fever, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia on postoperative days 10–15. The leukocyte count courses showed a pattern suggesting the 5-FU as the cause of leukopenia. There was no consistent warning signal for predicting severe neutropenia.

Discussion

Neutropenia following cytoreductive surgery combined with HIIC and EPIC has a high mortality (66%). Patients who are at special risk and should have a dose reduction include patients who had toxicities from prior chemotherapy, who present with obesity and anemia. The groups have an increased risk of developing postoperative profound neutropenia. This condition can result in a prohibitively high mortality and morbidity rate. Therefore, reduced doses of chemotherapy in selected patients are necessary to prevent this condition from developing.

Randomized controlled trial comparing oral amoxicillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin with intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin as outpatient therapy in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Outpatient oral therapy is infrequently used in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia (LRFN) as there is insufficient data regarding its equivalence as compared with parenteral therapy.

METHODS

This is a single institutional, randomized control trial in pediatric LRFN aged 2 to 15 years, in which 123 episodes in 88 patients were randomized to outpatient oral ofloxacin 7.5 mg/kg 12 hourly and amoxycillin-clavulanate 12.5 mg/kg 8 hourly or outpatient intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 75 mg/kg and amikacin 15 mg/kg once daily after blood cultures.

RESULTS

Out of 119 evaluable episodes, one-third were leukemia patients in maintenance and rest were solid tumors. Success was achieved in 55/61 (90.16%) and 54/58 (93.1%) in oral and IV arms, respectively, (P=0.56). There were 3 hospitalizations but no mortality. Median days to resolution of fever, absolute neutrophil count >500/mm(3) and antibiotic use were 3, 5, and 6 days in both arms. There were 5 blood culture isolates (3 gram-positive and 2 gram-negative bacteria). Failure of outpatient therapy was associated with perianal infections, bacteremia, febrile neutropenia onset before day 9 of chemotherapy in solid tumors and Vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma. All gram-positive isolates were successes, whereas both gram-negative isolates were failures. Diarrhea in IV arm and Vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in the oral arm predicted failure in subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient therapy is efficacious and safe in pediatric LRFN. There was no difference in outcome in oral versus IV outpatient therapy. Amoxycillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin may be the oral regimen of choice.

Applying the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk scoring in predicting outcome of febrile neutropenia patients in a cohort of patients

The purpose of this study was to determine if the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk-index score is able to predict the outcome of febrile neutropenia in patients with underlying hematological malignancy and to look at the other possible predictors of outcome. A retrospective study of 116 episodes of febrile neutropenia in patients who were admitted to the hematology ward of a local medical center in Malaysia between January 1st 2004 and January 31st 2005. Patient characteristics and the MASCC score were compared with outcome. The MASCC score predicted the outcome of febrile neutropenic episodes with a positive predictive value of 82.9%, a sensitivity of 93%, and specificity of 67%. Other predictors of a favorable outcome were those patients who had lymphomas versus leukemias, duration of neutropenia of less than 7 days, low burden of illness characterized by the absence of an infective focus and absence of lower respiratory tract infection, a serum albumin of >25 g/l, and the absence of gram-negative bacteremia on univariate analysis but only serum albumin level, low burden of illness, and presence of respiratory infection were significantly associated with unfavorable outcome after multivariate analysis. The MASCC score is a useful predictor of outcome in patients with febrile neutropenia with underlying hematological malignancies. This scoring system may be adapted for use in local settings to guide the clinical management of patients with this condition.

Clinical practice patterns of managing low-risk adult febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy in the USA

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine oncologists' current practice patterns for antibiotic management of low-risk fever and neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A self-administered survey was developed to query management practices for low-risk FN patients and sent to 3,600 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology physician members; hypothetical case scenarios were included to assess factors influencing decisions about outpatient treatment.

RESULTS

Of 3,560 actively practicing oncologists, 1,207 replied (34%). Outpatient antibiotics are used by 82% for selected low-risk FN patients (27% used in them >65% of their patients). Oral levofloxacin (50%), ciprofloxacin (36%), and ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate (35%) are common outpatient regimens. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is used by 45% of oncologists, in a subset of afebrile patients at low risk for FN; growth factors are used adjunctively by 48% for treating low-risk FN. Factors associated with choosing outpatient treatment were: frequency of use in oncologists' own practices, absence of hematologic malignancy, lower patient age, no infiltrate on X-ray, no prior serious infection, shorter expected FN duration, lower creatinine levels, and shorter distance of patient's residence from the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

US oncologists, who responded are willing to prescribe outpatient oral antibiotic treatment for low-risk FN, although practices vary considerably and are based on favorable clinical factors. However, practices are often employed that are not recommended for low-risk patients by current guidelines, including fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, adjunctive and/or prophylactic growth factors, and use of levofloxacin for empiric therapy. Educational efforts are needed to better guide cost-effective and supportive care.

Management of febrile neutropenia in solid tumours and lymphomas using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index: feasibility and safety in routine clinical practice

GOALS OF WORK

Febrile neutropenia (FN) represents a spectrum of severity in which low-risk patients can be defined using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index. However, despite publication in 2000, there remains limited published literature to date to support the use of MASCC risk assessment in routine clinical practice and eligibility for early hospital discharge. In this study, we present our experience with the routine use of the MASCC risk index to determine the management of FN in our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients treated for solid tumours or lymphomas with low-risk FN (MASCC score >/ or =21) were eligible for oral antibiotics (ciprofloxacin plus either co-amoxiclav or doxycycline) and for early hospital discharge irrespective of first or subsequent episode. The primary outcome was rate of resolution of FN without serious medical complications (SMC). Secondary outcomes were the "success" of antibiotic therapy without treatment modifications, duration of hospitalisation and rate of readmissions.

RESULTS

A total of 100 FN episodes occurring in 83 patients were treated over a 6-month period. Ninety of these episodes were low-risk (90%), of which 75 received oral antibiotics (83.3%) and 3 (3.3%) experienced SMC, and the success rate was 94.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.6-99.3%] in low-risk episodes. The median duration of hospitalisation was 2.5 days (25th centile: 1.0 day; 75th centile: 5.0 days) in low-risk compared to 6.5 days (25th centile: 5.3 days; 75th centile: 9.3 days) in high-risk episodes (p = 0.003); 2 days for low-risk episodes treated with oral antibiotics compared to 4 days for low-risk receiving intravenous antibiotics (p = 0.015). Positive predictive value for the MASCC index was 96.7% (95% CI 95.0-98.6%).

CONCLUSION

The MASCC risk index is both feasible and safe when used in standard clinical practice to guide the management of FN in patients with solid tumours and lymphomas. Patients predicted to have low risk can be managed safely with oral antibiotics and early hospital discharge.

Outpatient therapy for febrile neutropenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of febrile neutropenia has evolved significantly with the development of risk stratification and recognition of the efficacy of oral antibiotics in low-risk patients. There remains uncertainty concerning the need for hospitalization and role of early hospital discharge. We review recent evidence in this field and identify outstanding issues for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have confirmed the utility of the MASCC risk index. Preliminary findings suggest that early hospital discharge is feasible in low-risk patients with solid tumours and lymphomas, at least in specialist centres. Median hospital stays may be reduced to 48 h with no increase in serious medical complications. Readmission rates remain low.

SUMMARY

All patients with febrile neutropenia should undergo risk stratification on admission, and low-risk patients should be considered eligible for combination oral antibiotics from the outset. Those patients who show signs of fever resolution and subjective improvement are eligible for early discharge. More research is required with regard to patients with haematological malignancies and/or receiving prophylactic antibiotics, and in the development of factors predictive of successful early discharge. Further data are required regarding whether strategies involving early discharge can be safely implemented at centres outside those which have pioneered these approaches.

Management of febrile neutropenia in the United Kingdom: time for a national trial?

Recent advances in febrile neutropenia (FN) have highlighted the value of risk stratification and the evolving role of oral antibiotics with early hospital discharge in low-risk patients. The aim of this study was to survey whether these advances have been translated into routine clinical practice in the UK. Questionnaires were sent to cancer clinicians across the UK to determine clinicians' routine management of FN, including use of risk stratification, antibiotic regimen and criteria for hospital discharge. In all, 128 clinicians responded, representing 50 cancer departments (83%). Only 38% of respondents stratify patients according to risk and with substantial variation in the criteria defining ‘low-risk’. Furthermore, only 22% of clinicians use oral antibiotics as first-line treatment in any patients with FN, but this was significantly greater among clinicians who do compared to those who do not stratify patients by risk, 51 vs 4% (P<0.0001). These findings suggest a slow and/or cautious introduction of newer strategies for the management of low-risk FN in the UK. However, 84% of respondents confirmed their willingness to participate in a trial of oral antibiotics combined with early discharge in low-risk FN.

Outpatient treatment of low-risk neutropenic fever in cancer patients using oral moxifloxacin

BACKGROUND

Oral-based antibiotic therapy is the standard of care in the management of cancer patients with low-risk neutropenic fever. Nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge, the best antibiotic regimen and the feasibility of ambulatory treatment have not been clearly defined.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin as outpatient treatment in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia who were selected according to the recently proposed Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk assessment model. Moxifloxacin was given at a dose of 400 mg orally once daily.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with solid and hematologic malignancies, the majority of whom (84%) had advanced disease, were included in the current study. The median neutrophil count at the time of study entry was 340/mm3 (range, 20-950/mm3) and the median duration of neutropenia was 4 days (range, 3-14 days). Of 55 neutropenic episodes, 50 (91%) had a successful outcome with a median time to defervescence of 2 days (range, 1-5 days). A multivariate analysis indicated that severe neutropenia (an absolute neutrophil count of < 100 mm3) was the only independent factor associated with treatment failure (P < 0.04). Moxifloxacin was found to be well tolerated and there were no infectious deaths reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrated that moxifloxacin was a highly effective and safe regimen in the outpatient treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.

The role of colony-stimulating factors and granulocyte transfusion in treatment options for neutropenia in children with cancer

Children with cancer receiving anticancer therapy always experience neutropenia, and as a result often develop serious neutropenic infections that cause morbidity and/or mortality. Intensive chemotherapy with improved supportive care for neutropenia contribute to the recent advances in treatment outcome in children with cancer. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can shorten the duration and decrease the severity of neutropenia, and thus support intensive chemotherapy. Both G-CSF and GM-CSF stimulate proliferation and maturation of myeloid progenitor cells and are thus used to help mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells, and after stem-cell transplantation. The American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000 Guidelines recommended that colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) can be administered as a primary prophylaxis with a chemotherapy regimen if previous experiences with chemotherapy regimens have shown that the incidence of febrile neutropenia (neutropenic fever) is > or =40%. The routine use of CSFs for secondary prophylaxis or for patients with afebrile neutropenia is not recommended in order to avoid the overuse of CSFs. The use of a CSF may be considered in children with febrile neutropenia with a neutrophil count <100/microL, uncontrolled primary disease, pneumonia, hypotension, multiorgan dysfunction (sepsis syndrome), or invasive fungal infection. Although these guidelines are generally applicable to children with cancer, further studies on CSFs are certainly needed in pediatric oncology. The recent advances in granulocyte collection, using healthy volunteer donor stimulation with G-CSF and/or dexamethasone to yield large numbers of granulocytes has made granulocyte transfusion a more realistic option. Granulocyte transfusion has shown promising results in treating children with severe neutropenic infection; however, controlled trials are warranted to clarify the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this procedure.

Oral antibiotics with early hospital discharge compared with in-patient intravenous antibiotics for low-risk febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer: a prospective randomised controlled single centre study

Neutropenic sepsis remains a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy. However, it is possible to identify patients who are at low risk for serious complications and for whom less-intensive, more-convenient treatment may be appropriate. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge in comparison with standard in-patient intravenous antibiotics in patients with low-risk neutropenic fever. In all, 126 episodes of low-risk neutropenic fever occurred in 102 patients. Patients were randomised to receive either: an oral regimen of ciprofloxacin (750 mg 12 hourly) plus amoxicillin-clavulanate (675 mg 8 hourly) for a total of 5 days, or a standard intravenous regimen of gentamicin and tazocin (piperacillin/tazobactam) until hospital discharge. Patients randomised to oral antibiotics were eligible for discharge following 24 h of hospitalisation, if clinically stable and symptomatically improved. The efficacy of the two arms was similar: initial treatment was successful without antibiotic modification in 90% of episodes in the intravenous arm and 84.8% of episodes in the oral arm, P=0.55, absolute difference between the groups 5.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference -7 to 17.3%. Only one episode in the oral arm was associated with significant clinical deterioration: this occurred within the initial in-patient assessment period. The median in-patient stay was 4 days in the intravenous arm (range 2-8) and 2 days in the oral arm (range 1-16 days), P&<0.0005. The reduction in hospital stay led to significant cost-savings in the oral arm. In conclusion, this study suggests that oral antibiotics in conjunction with early hospital discharge for patients who remain stable after a 24 h period of in-patient monitoring offers a feasible and cost-effective alternative to conventional management of low-risk neutropenic fever.

Outpatient therapy for febrile neutropenia: clinical and economic implications

Although febrile episodes in neutropenic patients remain a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy, considerable progress has been achieved in understanding this issue. Febrile neutropenic patients represent a heterogeneous population that displays a very variable risk for serious medical complications. It has also been ascertained that in low-risk patients, the standard of care can be safely and effectively shifted from traditional hospital-based, parenteral, empiric, broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy to outpatient treatment, even for the entire duration of the febrile episode. Furthermore, in the last years some risk assessment models have been developed to identify, at the onset of febrile episodes, low-risk neutropenic patients who are most likely to have a favourable outcome (and who can effectively and safely be treated on an outpatient basis). With respect to traditional hospital-based therapy, the outpatient treatment of low-risk patients is associated with several advantages, including a conspicuous cost saving. Some strategies for inpatient therapy, such as switching from intravenous to oral antibacterials and early discharge, can allow some cost containment; however, the most substantial decrease in costs can be obtained by using outpatient treatment over the entire febrile episode, especially by using oral antibacterials. In spite of the considerable number of clinical studies published over the past 20 years, only limited pharmacoeconomic data on this issue are available. Future comparative studies between outpatient and inpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia, in addition to clinical outcomes (e.g. survival, time to clinical response), should therefore include the following: (i) a detailed analysis of total costs, specifying the setting of outpatient treatment and the method of administration of antimicrobial agents (home nursing, self administration or treatment at infusion centres or at a low-care unit of the hospital); (ii) cost of inpatient treatment if outpatient therapy fails; and (iii) out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the patients.

Evolving concepts of management of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent investigations of febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients have identified subsets of low-risk patients who can be managed with less antibiotic therapy than previously recommended standards.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed and Medline were searched for prospective trials and reviews of febrile neutropenia in children. Magnitude and duration of fever and neutropenia, comorbidities, and therapeutic strategies were examined.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven prospective trials and five reviews were identified. The child with cancer and low-risk febrile neutropenia is clinically well and afebrile within 24-96 hr of antibiotic therapy and has evidence of marrow recovery with a rising phagocyte count. Disqualifying comorbidities include leukemia at diagnosis or in relapse, uncontrolled cancer, age under 1 year, medical condition(s) that would otherwise require hospitalization and social or economic conditions that may potentially compromise access to care or compliance. Therapeutic strategies include parenteral or oral antibiotics in the hospital with early discharge or parenteral antibiotics in the outpatient setting followed by oral or parenteral therapy and daily reassessment. Although as many as 25% of low-risk patients require modification of therapy and/or hospitalization, life-threatening or fatal infection is exceptional.

CONCLUSION

One-third to one-half the children with febrile neutropenia are at low-risk of serious infection. In the context of clinic trials, they can be safely managed with inpatient or outpatient strategies that maintain close follow-up and reduce the burden of antibiotic therapy. Adoption of these alternative strategies as the standard of care should proceed with caution guided by written protocols.

Nursing implications of mylotarg: a novel antibody-targeted chemotherapy for CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To review the nursing implications of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg(r), CMA-676, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA), a novel monoclonal antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

DATA SOURCES

Published articles, abstracts, book chapters, manufacturer information, unpublished clinical trial data, and personal experiences with gemtuzumab ozogamicin.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Conventional chemotherapy for AML is associated with toxicities that often limit treatment options when AML relapses. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin is a humanized recombinant anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody linked to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic agent. The antibody targets the CD33 antigen found on the surface of leukemic blast cells and myeloid precursors. This targeting effect reduces the toxicity of gemtuzumab ozogamicin. The efficacy and tolerability of gemtuzumab ozogamicin have been documented in relapsed AML, particularly in patients 60 years of age or older, who often have no other treatment options. As with other monoclonal antibody therapies, an "infusion syndrome" (i.e., fever and chills) may occur but can be managed effectively when administration guidelines are used.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin is the first of a new class of targeted therapies for the treatment of relapsed AML. A number of implications for nurses exist.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses must be knowledgeable about gemtuzumab ozogamicin preparation and administration, patient selection and monitoring, and intervention procedures. This knowledge is necessary to accurately inform patients and their families of the possible course of treatment and potential side effects.

Prediction of neutropenia

Newer treatment strategies for the management of febrile neutropenic patients are being developed. These include: (a) hospital based oral therapy; (b) early discharge after initial stabilization in-hospital, and (c) out-patient therapy. All strategies are likely to be more successful in patients with short-lived neutropenia (< or = 7 days) than in those with more prolonged neutropenia. Although risk-prediction rules and clinical criteria can help clinicians identify 'low-risk' neutropenic patients, the overall ability of clinicians to accurately predict the subsequent duration of neutropenia once a neutropenic patient becomes febrile needs to be improved upon considerably. One attempt to do so is the survey being conducted by the Infection Study Section of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). Development of an accurate rule for the prediction of neutropenia will enable more appropriate, risk-based therapy to be administered to febrile neutropenic patients, and will represent a significant advance in the management of such patients.

Oral versus intravenous empirical antimicrobial therapy for fever in patients with granulocytopenia who are receiving cancer chemotherapy. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

BACKGROUND

Intravenously administered antimicrobial agents have been the standard choice for the empirical management of fever in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia. If orally administered empirical therapy is as effective as intravenous therapy, it would offer advantages such as improved quality of life and lower cost.

METHODS

In a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned febrile patients with cancer who had granulocytopenia that was expected to resolve within 10 days to receive empirical therapy with either oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) plus amoxicillin-clavulanate (625 mg three times daily) or standard daily doses of intravenous ceftriaxone plus amikacin. All patients were hospitalized until their fever resolved. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether there was equivalence between the regimens, defined as an absolute difference in the rates of success of 10 percent or less.

RESULTS

Equivalence was demonstrated at the second interim analysis, and the trial was terminated after the enrollment of 353 patients. In the analysis of the 312 patients who were treated according to the protocol and who could be evaluated, treatment was successful in 86 percent of the patients in the oral-therapy group (95 percent confidence interval, 80 to 91 percent) and 84 percent of those in the intravenous-therapy group (95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 90 percent; P=0.02). The results were similar in the intention-to-treat analysis (80 percent and 77 percent, respectively; P=0.03), as were the duration of fever, the time to a change in the regimen, the reasons for such a change, the duration of therapy, and survival. The types of adverse events differed slightly between the groups but were similar in frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

In low-risk patients with cancer who have fever and granulocytopenia, oral therapy with ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin-clavulanate is as effective as intravenous therapy.

A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Among patients with fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy for cancer who have a low risk of complications, oral administration of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics may be an acceptable alternative to intravenous treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients (age, 5 to 74 years) who had fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy for cancer. Neutropenia was expected to be present for no more than 10 days in these patients, and they had to have no other underlying conditions. Patients were assigned to receive either oral ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin-clavulanate or intravenous ceftazidime. They were hospitalized until fever and neutropenia resolved.

RESULTS

A total of 116 episodes were included in each group (84 patients in the oral-therapy group and 79 patients in the intravenous-therapy group). The mean neutrophil counts at admission were 81 per cubic millimeter and 84 per cubic millimeter, respectively; the mean duration of neutropenia was 3.4 and 3.8 days, respectively. Treatment was successful without the need for modifications in 71 percent of episodes in the oral-therapy group and 67 percent of episodes in the intravenous-therapy group (difference between groups, 3 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -8 percent to 15 percent; P=0.48). Treatment was considered to have failed because of the need for modifications in the regimen in 13 percent and 32 percent of episodes, respectively (P<0.001) and because of the patient's inability to tolerate the regimen in 16 percent and 1 percent of episodes, respectively (P<0.001). There were no deaths. The incidence of intolerance of the oral antibiotics was 16 percent, as compared with 8 percent for placebo (P=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized low-risk patients who have fever and neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy, empirical therapy with oral ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin-clavulanate is safe and effective.

Making the transition from hospital to home: caring for the newly diagnosed child with cancer

Current trends in the management of health care show increasing pressure for earlier discharge of children, and their families may or may not be ready to continue the child's care at home. This article provides information that helps the home care provider bridge the transition from hospital care to home care. Care frequently is coordinated by a hospital-based clinical nurse specialist who provides psychosocial support, reinforces teaching, minimizes risks for complications, and performs home infusion therapy, such as antibiotics, chemotherapy, analgesics, total parenteral nutrition, and biologic therapy.

Ambulatory management of chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia in adult cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the management of low-risk adults with chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia (CIFN). Included in the review are methods to identify these patients, management options, and economic impact associated with nontraditional treatment options.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE and bibliographic search (January 1966-December 1997) for all English-language studies evaluating the identification and treatment of adult, low-risk CIFN patients was completed. Reference lists from identified articles also served as literature sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All human studies identified from the data sources were evaluated. Pertinent information, excluding pediatric studies, was selected and critically evaluated for discussion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Alterations in prominent bacterial isolates in CIFN, newer antibiotic choices, enhanced focus on patient comfort, and cost-containment directives have promoted recent research identifying adult cancer patients with low-risk CIFN. Using this information to select low-risk CIFN patients, several investigators have completed trials using antibiotic therapy applicable to the ambulatory setting. Additionally, some investigators have included the use of an oral outpatient antibiotic regimen. Limited data indicate that this approach is a reasonable treatment option for selected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of adult patients with CIFN are at low risk for serious morbidity and mortality when treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics in the ambulatory setting. Managing these patients with this approach requires close patient selection, intense follow-up, data collection, and ongoing evaluation to determine efficacy and patient safety. Currently, ambulatory treatment with oral antibiotics for CIFN is not considered standard of care. Further studies of larger size designed to confirm low-risk patient characteristics and optimal antibiotic selection are required.

Safety of early hospital discharge of selected febrile children and adolescents with cancer with prolonged neutropenia

PROBLEM

The safety of early hospital discharge (i.e., before the absolute neutrophil count [ANC] exceeds 500 cell/mm3) of febrile neutropenic children and adolescents with cancer who had experienced prolonged neutropenia (i.e., for more than 7 days) following admission has not been studied.

METHOD OF STUDY

Three hundred and thirty nine consecutive admissions of children and adolescents with cancer for management of febrile neutropenia were reviewed. Early discharge criteria included absence of fever for 24 hours prior to discharge, sterile blood cultures for 24 hours, evidence of bone marrow recovery defined as a sustained increase in platelet count and ANC or absolute phagocyte count (APC), and control of local infection if present. Children hospitalized with febrile neutropenia who remained neutropenic for more than 7 days were analyzed to assess their outcomes following discharge it they had met criteria for early hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients in whom neutropenia had persisted for more than 7 days were discharged before attaining an ANC greater than 500/mm3 when they met the early discharge criteria. Only two children (6%) required readmission for recurrent fever, a rate which was not different from that of patients discharged after a more transient episode of neutropenia (2 of 33 vs. 3 of 121, P = 0.3). Both patients who were readmitted had a source of local infection which worsened despite oral antibiotics. Both patients appeared clinically well at the time of readmission and had sterile cultures during their second hospitalization with resolution of local infection.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that low-risk criteria used to select children with cancer for discharge before complete resolution of neutropenia can be safely applied to those patients whose neutropenia lasted more than 7 days following admission.

Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer

Until recently, febrile neutropenic patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics in inpatient settings. Because of work completed in the last several years by various investigators, identification of a low-risk group of febrile, neutropenic patients has allowed successful treatment with both parenteral and oral antibiotics in an ambulatory environment. This accomplishment has been facilitated by advances in broad-spectrum antibiotics with long half-lives and stabilities, the introduction of the quinolones providing oral antipseudomonal activity, home health care, improvements in vascular access devices, and technically enhanced antibiotic delivery systems. This review focuses on the rationale of risk stratification and the progress made in treating low-risk febrile neutropenic patients as outpatients.

Outpatient antibiotic treatment in low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

Traditionally febrile neutropenic patients have been treated with parenteral antibiotics in an inpatient setting; however, recent work by several investigators has demonstrated successful treatment with both parenteral and oral antibiotics in an ambulatory environment. This has been accomplished by identification of low-risk neutropenic patients, advances in broad-spectrum antibiotics with long half-lives and stabilities, the introduction of the oral quinolones, home health-care initiatives, improvements in vascular access devices, and development of technically enhanced antibiotic delivery systems. Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients should now be considered an acceptable alternative to hospital-based treatment. This review focuses on the development and rationale of risk stratification and examines the results of various outpatient antibiotic trials recently completed.

Early empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenia patients at low risk

Although it is apparent that certain patients with febrile neutropenic episodes can benefit from outpatient antibiotic therapy, not all low-risk patients are treated in this fashion. There are barriers, real and perceived, to implementing this approach for patients, health care providers, and caregivers. Table 3 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of ambulatory management of febrile neutropenic patients. For many patients and physicians, outpatient oral antibiotics may be preferred, whereas for others a more conservative approach might be needed in order to feel comfortable with treating this population on an outpatient basis. In this situation, patients can be treated in a stepwise fashion as shown in Table 4. These alternatives allow physicians and patients options to discuss when planning treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia.

Empiric therapy for infections in the febrile, neutropenic, compromised host

In the years to come, it is likely that with the advent of cytokines and even more with possibility to insert drug-resistant genes into hematopoietic stem cells, the risk of infection will be decreased because the severity and duration of neutropenia will be minimized. It is true that the ideal empiric antimicrobial regimen--a single antibiotic with a low incidence of superinfection and a low toxicity, without need for subsequent additions and readjustments--is still a wish. In the meantime and while living in the neutropenic area, physicians, for the benefit of patients, have to follow guidelines and create algorithms (see Fig. 1). Recommendations, however, should be always adjustable to the individual characteristics of the patient and the institution and to progress in antimicrobial chemotherapy. It is inevitable that research and clinical practice should go "hand in hand" in these "difficult-to-manage" and "difficult-to-treat" patients. After all, it should never be forgotten that the ultimate goal of empiric antimicrobial regimens in febrile neutropenia is to ensure patients' survival.

Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy

The bone marrow is an important dose-limiting cell renewal tissue for chemotherapy, wide-field irradiation, and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Over the past 5-10 years a great deal has been discovered about the hematopoietic stem cell compartment. Although the toxicity associated with prolonged myelosuppression continues to limit the wider use of chemotherapy and irradiation, ways are being discovered to circumvent this toxicity such as with the increasing use of cytokines. This review describes what is known of how chemotherapy and irradiation damage stem cells and the microenvironment, how cytokines protect hematopoietic cells from radiation damage and speed marrow recovery after chemotherapy or marrow transplantation, and how various types of blood marrow cells contribute to engraftment and long-term hematopoiesis after high doses of cytotoxic agents and/or total body irradiation.

Prevention of gram-positive infections in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation: a randomized controlled trial of vancomycin

Between January 1986 and June 1988, 155 patients (73 children and 82 adults), who were candidates for bone marrow transplantation, were included in a randomized controlled trial (75 patients in vancomycin group and 80 patients in the group without vancomycin) to evaluate the efficiency of a short course of vancomycin (10 mg/kg i.v. every 6 hours, day-5 to +1) in decreasing the incidence of Gram-positive infections during aplasia after high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of documented septicemia, documented coccus Gram-positive infections, or fever of unknown origins during aplasia in the 2 groups. Thus, short prophylactic treatment with vancomycin proved inefficient in reducing morbidity due to infection after high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

Outpatient management of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients

Febrile neutropenic patients have traditionally received hospital-based parenteral antibiotic therapy because of the risk of serious complications and associated mortality. Recently a low-risk subset among febrile neutropenic patients has been identified. Several alternatives to hospital-based therapy have been evaluated in such patients. These include early discharge to home antibiotic therapy after initial stabilization in the hospital, or treatment of the entire febrile episode with intravenous and/or oral antibiotics in an ambulatory setting. A multidisciplinary approach involving the physician and other health-care providers, the patients, and their families, ensures the success of this therapeutic modality. Careful patient selection, daily follow-up, close monitoring for the development of complications and/or adverse reactions, and informed consent along with detailed instructions to patients, minimize the risk of the development of serious complications. Outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients should now be considered an acceptable alternative to hospital-based therapy.

A review of triage and management of burns victims following a nuclear disaster

The field of combined injury is relatively unfamiliar to burn surgeons. The mortality and morbidity of combined injury victims is higher than that of the injuries separately. The secondary consequences of radiation exposure, e.g. immunosuppression, infection, bleeding and fluid and electrolyte loss, significantly affects the management plan for burn victims. Increased work loads on medical personnel and the hospital further affects the management plan and outcome adversely. Based on previous experiences and experimental studies by various authors, a plan for management of burn victims in nuclear casualties is presented for effective utilization of available resources for overloaded burn centres in emergency situations. The proper recording of the experience of such situations is stressed.

Safety and cost effectiveness of early hospital discharge of lower risk children with cancer admitted for fever and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for fever during periods of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia includes hospitalization and administration of intravenous antibiotics until the patient is afebrile and no longer neutropenic. This study prospectively evaluates the safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge of selected low risk children before recovery from neutropenia.

METHODS

We studied 74 children with cancer during 131 consecutive admissions for fever during a period of neutropenia. All patients initially were hospitalized and received broad-spectrum antibiotics. Intravenous antibiotic therapy was discontinued, and the patients promptly were discharged even if they had an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 500 cells/mm3 as long as they were afebrile, appeared clinically well, had negative cultures, exhibited control of local infection, and showed hematologic evidence of bone marrow recovery.

RESULTS

Intravenous antibiotics were discontinued in 82 cases (63%) before recovery of the ANC to more than 500 cells/mm3, and 78 patients were discharged immediately. None of 70 patients discharged while neutropenic but exhibiting a rising ANC at the time of discharge developed recurrent fever and required readmission. Thirty of these children had an improving localized infection when intravenous antibiotics were discontinued and completed a course of oral antibiotics at home. The estimated mean savings in hospital charges due to early discharge was $5058 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Low risk children with cancer who are hospitalized and treated for fever and neutropenia but appear clinically well may have intravenous antibiotics discontinued and be discharged safely irrespective of the ANC, as long as their granulocyte count is rising. This approach shortens hospital stays and results in considerable cost savings.

Once daily antibiotic regimen in paediatric oncology

The feasibility and efficacy of a once daily antibiotic regimen were assessed in children with malignant tumours. Over a 44 month period, 296 febrile episodes were treated with a regimen of once daily ceftriaxone-amikacin (and teicoplanin or vancomycin if the patient had a central line). The treatment was successful in 272 (92%) episodes without modification of the antibiotic regimen, and only one patient died of uncontrolled sepsis. A once daily antibiotic regimen is therefore feasible and worthwhile in the treatment of febrile episodes in children with cancer.

Outpatient treatment of febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization and intravenous (IV) broad-spectrum antibiotics are the standard of care for all febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Recent work suggests that a low-risk population exists who might benefit from an alternate approach.

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed comparing oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg plus clindamycin 600 mg every 8 hours with IV aztreonam 2 g plus clindamycin 600 mg every 8 hours for the empiric outpatient treatment of febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer.

RESULTS

The oral regimen cured 35 of 40 episodes (88% response rate), whereas the IV regimen cured 41 of 43 episodes (95% response rate, P = 0.19). Although the cost of the oral regimen was significantly less than that of the IV regimen (P < 0.0001), it was associated with significant renal toxicity (P < 0.05), which led to early termination of the study. Overall, combining its safety and efficacy, the IV regimen was superior (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study suggested that outpatient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer is safe and effective. Better oral regimens are needed.

Strategy for antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic patients on selective antibiotic decontamination

In a non-randomized prospective study the need for broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was evaluated in selectively decontaminated neutropenic patients with fever. Fifty-two adult patients with a neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/l suffered 77 febrile episodes while receiving oral antibiotics for selective decontamination. Antibiotic treatment was only initiated if additional clinical signs or the microbiological culture results pointed to the likelihood of an infection. Treatment was either empirically based (broad-spectrum) or specific (narrow-spectrum). If a causative agent was identified, therapy was adjusted accordingly. If evidence of infection was lacking after 72-96 hours, the antibiotics were discontinued, and these patients were reexamined meticulously and repeatedly. For the 40 episodes without confirmed infection, the median duration of therapy was three days (range 0-13 days) and the survival rate 100%; for the 37 episodes with confirmed infection, the median duration of therapy was 12 days (range 1-49 days, p < 0.0001) and the survival rate 85%. After adjustment of therapy the final regimen was broad-spectrum in only 18% of treated episodes. None of the six deaths could be attributed to the withholding or stopping of broad-spectrum therapy. It is concluded that in febrile neutropenic patients on selective decontamination a standard therapy regimen with prolonged administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is not necessary. After initial intervention antibiotic therapy can safely be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.

The yield of routine chest radiography in children with cancer hospitalized for fever and neutropenia

A routine admission chest radiograph (CXR) in pediatric patients with cancer who are admitted to the hospital for fever and neutropenia has been advised because the signs and symptoms of pneumonia may be absent. The authors studied 131 consecutive patient admissions for fever and neutropenia to evaluate the diagnostic yield of routine CXR. All patients had a complete history, physical examination, complete blood count, blood culture, urinalysis, urine culture, and CXR. Patients routinely started ceftazidime monotherapy. Results of the CXR were correlated with the presence or absence of signs and symptoms of respiratory disease. Of 128 CXR results, 26 (20%) were abnormal (13 with known malignant disease, 2 with atelectasis, 3 with peribronchial cuffing, and 8 with pneumonia [6%]). Three patients with pneumonia were asymptomatic. Therefore, only 3 of 128 patients (2.3%) had pneumonia on CXR not suspected by physical examination. None would have had initial therapy modified based on the CXR finding alone. The authors concluded that the incidence of pneumonia in a child with fever and neutropenia is low and that routine CXR at diagnostic evaluation is unnecessary in the asymptomatic ambulatory patient.

Clinical use of biologic response modifiers in cancer treatment: an overview. Part II. Colony-stimulating factors and interleukin-2

Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) are hematopoietic growth hormones that stimulate the production, maturation, and function of white blood cells. The best studied are granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) and granulocyte CSF (G-CSF), both of which can be produced by recombinant DNA technology. Clinical indications for these agents include bone marrow failure secondary to administration of chemotherapeutic drugs or radiation, bone marrow transplantation, and a variety of congenital or iatrogenic neutropenias. Toxicity in usual clinical doses is mild, and consists mainly of bone pain and constitutional symptoms such as fever, headache, and myalgias. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a lymphokine that stimulates that multiplication of several types of killer cells. These cells can recognize and destroy foreign substances, such as tumors, without destroying normal cells. Major applications of IL-2 include treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma, in whom the overall objective response rate is 15-30 percent, and malignant melanoma with response rates of about 18 percent. Combination therapy with other biologics and conventional cytotoxic drugs may increase IL-2's efficacy against these tumors. Toxicity is generally severe, but reversible. Hemodynamic toxicity, consisting of hypotension, edema, weight gain, and decreased renal function, is most characteristic. Suggestions are given for pharmacologic management of these and other IL-2 toxicities.

Ceftazidime versus imipenem-cilastatin as initial monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients

One hundred febrile episodes in 89 neutropenic patients after cytotoxic chemotherapy were randomized to be treated with either ceftazidime or imipenem as initial monotherapy. The clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients were comparable. The response of the fever in patients who received imipenem was significantly better than that in those who received ceftazidime (77 versus 56%, respectively; P = 0.04), especially in those with microbiologically documented infection (81 versus 33%, respectively; P = 0.02). The in vitro susceptibilities and the clinical responses suggested that, with the possible exception of Pseudomonas spp., imipenem was more effective than ceftazidime in treating neutropenic infections caused by both gram-positive and -negative organisms. An additional 23 and 21% of the patients in the ceftazidime and imipenem groups, respectively, responded to the addition of cloxacillin and amikacin following failure of monotherapy. The majority of the treatment failures, relapses, and superinfections were related to resistant infective organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. or disseminated fungal infections.