Gentamicin-induced chronotoxicity: use of body temperature as a circadian marker rhythm

Universal Recommendations on Planning and Performing the Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) with a Focus on Mice and Rats

Translational audiology research aims to transfer basic research findings into practical clinical applications. While animal studies provide essential knowledge for translational research, there is an urgent need to improve the reproducibility of data derived from these studies. Sources of variability in animal research can be grouped into three areas: animal, equipment, and experimental. To increase standardization in animal research, we developed universal recommendations for designing and conducting studies using a standard audiological method: auditory brainstem response (ABR). The recommendations are domain-specific and are intended to guide the reader through the issues that are important when applying for ABR approval, preparing for, and conducting ABR experiments. Better experimental standardization, which is the goal of these guidelines, is expected to improve the understanding and interpretation of results, reduce the number of animals used in preclinical studies, and improve the translation of knowledge to the clinic.

Mechanisms of Ototoxicity and Otoprotection

Ototoxicity refers to damage to the inner ear that leads to functional hearing loss or vestibular disorders by selected pharmacotherapeutics as well as a variety of environmental exposures (eg, lead, cadmium, solvents). This article reviews the fundamental mechanisms underlying ototoxicity by clinically relevant, hospital-prescribed medications (ie, aminoglycoside antibiotics or cisplatin, as illustrative examples). Also reviewed are current strategies to prevent prescribed medication-induced ototoxicity, with several clinical or candidate interventional strategies being discussed.

Mechanisms of Aminoglycoside- and Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity

Purpose This review article summarizes our current understanding of the mechanisms underlying acquired hearing loss from hospital-prescribed medications that affects as many as 1 million people each year in Western Europe and North America. Yet, there are currently no federally approved drugs to prevent or treat the debilitating and permanent hearing loss caused by the life-saving platinum-based anticancer drugs or the bactericidal aminoglycoside antibiotics. Hearing loss has long-term impacts on quality-of-life measures, especially in young children and older adults. This review article also highlights some of the current knowledge gaps regarding iatrogenic causes of hearing loss. Conclusion Further research is urgently needed to further refine clinical practice and better ameliorate iatrogenic drug-induced hearing loss.

Investigation of treatment-time differences in colistin-induced nephrotoxicity in Wistar rats

Colistin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) occurs in up to 60% of patients, and this has restricted its clinical use. In view of its efficacy amidst the rising challenge of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria, current studies are focusing on ways to ameliorate colistin-induced nephrotoxicity. This study investigated treatment-time differences in colistin-induced nephrotoxicity in Wistar rats. A dose of 600,000 IU/Kg/day of colistimethate sodium (CMS) was administered to male Wistar rats to induce nephrotoxicity; the rats tolerated the higher dose for the treatment duration with higher mean values of serum creatinine, urea, and malondialdehyde compared to the group that received 450,000 IU/Kg/day CMS (p ≤ 0.05). Four groups (n = 8/group) of rats received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of 600,000 IU/Kg/day CMS each at four equally spaced circadian times (00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 h) to determine the time of administration with least renal toxicity. Biomarkers of oxidative stress and renal toxicity were measured and kidney histology studied after the treatments. The results showed a 24-h pattern in nephrotoxicity from CIN, and that treatment during the activity time period (dark phase) caused lowest CIN. Histological findings supported this finding, with photomicrographs consistently showing more pronounced features of CIN in the groups treated during time frame that coincided with the rest phase in rats (12:00 and 18:00).

Circadian vulnerability of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in the cochlea

The chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin is renowned for its ototoxic effects. While hair cells in the cochlea are established targets of cisplatin, less is known regarding the afferent synapse, which is an essential component in the faithful temporal transmission of sound. The glutamate aspartate transporter (GLAST) shields the auditory synapse from excessive glutamate release, and its loss of function increases the vulnerability to noise, salicylate, and aminoglycosides. Until now, the involvement of GLAST in cisplatin-mediated ototoxicity remains unknown. Here, we test in mice lacking GLAST the effects of a low-dose cisplatin known not to cause any detectable change in hearing thresholds. When administered at nighttime, a mild hearing loss in GLAST KO mice was found but not at daytime, revealing a potential circadian regulation of the vulnerability to cisplatin-mediated ototoxicity. We show that the auditory synapse of GLAST KO mice is more vulnerable to cisplatin administration during the active phase (nighttime) when compared to WT mice and treatment during the inactive phase (daytime). This effect was not related to the abundance of platinum compounds in the cochlea, rather cisplatin had a dose-dependent impact on cochlear clock rhythms only after treatment at nighttime suggesting that cisplatin can modulate the molecular clock. Our findings suggest that the current protocols of cisplatin administration in humans during daytime may cause a yet undetectable damage to the auditory synapse, more so in already damaged ears, and severely impact auditory sensitivity in cancer survivors.

Perspectives on the relevance of the circadian time structure to workplace threshold limit values and employee biological monitoring

The circadian time structure (CTS) and its disruption by rotating and nightshift schedules relative to work performance, accident risk, and health/wellbeing have long been areas of occupational medicine research. Yet, there has been little exploration of the relevance of the CTS to setting short-term, time-weighted, and ceiling threshold limit values (TLVs); conducting employee biological monitoring (BM); and establishing normative reference biological exposure indices (BEIs). Numerous publications during the past six decades document the CTS substantially affects the disposition - absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination - and effects of medications. Additionally, laboratory animal and human studies verify the tolerance to chemical, biological (contagious), and physical agents can differ extensively according to the circadian time of exposure. Because of slow and usually incomplete CTS adjustment by rotating and permanent nightshift workers, occupational chemical and other contaminant encounters occur during a different circadian stage than for dayshift workers. Thus, the intended protection of some TLVs when working the nightshift compared to dayshift might be insufficient, especially in high-risk settings. The CTS is germane to employee BM in that large-amplitude predictable-in-time 24h variation can occur in the concentration of urine, blood, and saliva of monitored chemical contaminants and their metabolites plus biomarkers indicative of adverse xenobiotic exposure. The concept of biological time-qualified (for rhythms) reference values, currently of interest to clinical laboratory pathology practice, is seemingly applicable to industrial medicine as circadian time and workshift-specific BEIs to improve surveillance of night workers, in particular. Furthermore, BM as serial assessments performed frequently both during and off work, exemplified by employee self-measurement of lung function using a small portable peak expiratory flow meter, can easily identify intolerance before induction of pathology.

Circadian regulation of auditory function

The circadian system integrates environmental cues to regulate physiological functions in a temporal fashion. The suprachiasmatic nucleus, located in the hypothalamus, is the master clock that synchronizes central and peripheral organ clocks to orchestrate physiological functions. Recently, molecular clock machinery has been identified in the cochlea unravelling the potential involvement in the circadian regulation of auditory functions. Here, we present background information on the circadian system and review the recent findings that introduce circadian rhythms to the auditory field. Understanding the mechanisms by which circadian rhythms regulate auditory function will provide fundamental knowledge on the signalling networks that control vulnerability and resilience to auditory insults.

Blood-perilymph barrier and ototoxicity: an in vivo study in the rat

Cisplatin and gentamicin are two ototoxicants that are supposed to be transported by the paracellar route, i.e. via cellular junctions, to the perilymphatic compartment. This study was initiated to test the hypothesis that susceptive variation of individuals to ototoxic drugs may be explained by variability in transport properties. The transport of radioactive mannitol through the blood-perilymph barrier was correlated in vivo with the acute effect of cisplatin and gentamicin on auditory function. Transport of radioactive mannitol across the blood-perilymph barrier was monitored by sampling of scala vestibuli perilymph at 60 and 120 min after an intravenous infusion of the tracer to nephrectomized Long Evans rats. Counting of hair cell loss was performed in the animals receiving 16 mg/kg body weight cisplatin. The transport of radioactive mannitol across the blood-perilymph barrier did not correlate with the ototoxic effect of cisplatin, evaluated as changes in the auditory-evoked brainstem response thresholds or loss of outer hair cells. The results provide evidence that the barrier function is not involved in the interindividual variability of the ototoxic effect of cisplatin. Furthermore, it can be postulated that neither cisplatin nor gentamicin induce a disruption of endothelial cell junction stability in the inner ear.

Circadian variations in serum levels and the renal toxicity of aminoglycosides in patients

Animals show a faster clearance and a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity when aminoglycosides are administered during the activity period. Human data on a circadian rhythm in pharmacokinetics are conflicting, and there are no data on a circadian rhythm in toxicity. When aminoglycosides are administered once daily, as is often done, a circadian rhythm in pharmacokinetics or toxicity could have clinical implications. In a prospective study we investigated the influence of drug administration time on serum drug levels and the incidence of nephrotoxicity in 221 patients with serious infections treated with gentamicin or tobramycin once daily. We did not find statistically significant differences in trough or peak levels for the three time periods (midnight to 7:30 AM, 8 AM to 3:30 PM, and 4 to 11:30 PM). Nephrotoxicity occurred significantly more frequently when the aminoglycosides were administered during the rest period (midnight to 7:30 AM; p = 0.004). In addition to the coadministration of high-dose furosemide or other nephrotoxic antibiotics and the duration of treatment, the time of administration was still an independent risk factor in a multivariate analysis.

Chronobiology and chronotherapy in medicine

There is a fascinating and exceedingly important area of medicine that most of us have not been exposed to at any level of our medical training. This relatively new area is termed chronobiology; that is, how time-related events shape our daily biologic responses and apply to any aspect of medicine with regard to altering pathophysiology and treatment response. For example, normally occurring circadian (daily cycles, approximately 24 hours) events, such as nadirs in epinephrine and cortisol levels that occur in the body around 10 PM to 4 AM and elevated histamine and other mediator levels that occur between midnight and 4 AM, play a major role in the worsening of asthma during the night. In fact, this nocturnal exacerbation occurs in the majority of asthmatic patients. Because all biologic functions, including those of cells, organs, and the entire body, have circadian, ultradian (less than 22 hours), or infradian (greater than 26 hours) rhythms, understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of disease needs to be viewed with these changes in mind. Biologic rhythms are ingrained, and although they can be changed over time by changing the wake-sleep cycle, these alterations occur over days. However, sleep itself can adversely affect the pathophysiology of disease. The non-light/dark influence of biologic rhythms was first described in 1729 by the French astronomer Jean-Jacques de Mairan. Previously, it was presumed that the small red flowers of the plant Kalanchoe bloss feldiuna opened in the day because of the sunlight and closed at night because of the darkness. When de Mairan placed the plant in total darkness, the opening and closing of the flowers still occurred on its intrinsic circadian basis. It is intriguing to think about how the time of day governs the pathophysiology of disease. On awakening in the morning, heart rate and blood pressure briskly increase, as do platelet aggregability and other clotting factors. This can be linked to the acrophase (peak event) of heart attacks. During the afternoon we hit our best mental and physical performance, which explains why most of us state that "I am not a morning person." Even the tolerance for alcohol varies over the 24-hour cycle, with best tolerance around 5 pm (i.e. "Doctor, I only have a couple of highballs before dinner"). Thus, all biologic functions, from those of the cell, the tissue, the organs, and the entire body, run on a cycle of altering activity and function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Nephrotoxicity of low doses of tobramycin in rats: effect of the time of administration

The circadian and the circannual variations of the nephrotoxicity of tobramycin were studied in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were maintained on a light-dark period of 14/10 hrs (light on: 06h00 to 20h00). They were injected once daily for 4 and 10 days with saline or tobramycin at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day i.p. at either 08h00, 14h00, 20h00 and 02h00, in April 1991, July 91, October 91, January 92. In April 91, tobramycin injected at 14h00 during 10 days induced a significant increase of [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA of renal cortex as compared to other groups (p < 0.01): toxicity was highest at 14h00 and lowest at 02h00. No temporal change was observed in the renal cortical accumulation of tobramycin, and in serum creatinine after the 4 or 10 days of treatment. In experiments done in April, July and October 1991 and in January 1992, no circannual variation was found in tobramycin cortical levels but peaks of toxicity were observed at 02h00 in April and October 1991 and at 14h00 in July 1991 and January 1992. There was no linear correlation between the toxicity and the tobramycin accumulation in the renal cortex (r = 0.21). The data suggest that the circadian changes in tobramycin toxicity are due to temporal changes in the susceptibility of renal cells to tobramycin.

Interindividual differences in chronopharmacologic effects of drugs: a background for individualization of chronotherapy

In order to optimize chronotherapeutic schedules (designs), we examined the interindividual differences in chronopharmacologic effects of drugs with consideration of the following three factors: (a) inherited factors of direct relevance to chronopharmacology (genetic variability, gender-related differences) as well as age-related differences; (b) interindividual difference in chronoeffectiveness related to disease (e.g., various types and stages of cancer, affective disorders, etc.) as well as to drug-dependent alteration (phase shifts, distortion) of biological rhythms; and (c) means to solve problems resulting from the need of individualization in chronotherapy. These involve the use of circadian marker rhythms (MR) whose characteristics (peak or trough time, amplitude, etc.) can be precisely quantified and thus are applicable as a reference system for physiologic, pathologic, pharmacologic, and therapeutic uses. The MR has to be specific and pertinent and must be easily monitored and documented. This approach can be further advanced by the use of a battery of MRs rather than a single MR. Other suggested means relate to the fact that chronobiotics (agents capable of influencing parameters of a set of biological rhythms) should be considered (e.g., corticoids and adrenocorticotropic hormone) and/or to the subject's synchronization should be enforced by "conventional" zeitgebers (e.g., bright light, physical activity).