Effects of the time of antihypertensive drugs administration on the stage of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with arterial hypertension

The effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on the cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antihypertensive drugs are one of the most effective strategies to prevent disability and mortality; however, there have been contradictory findings about the best dosing time for antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

We synthesized randomized controlled studies (RCTs) from the Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until 13 October 2022. The risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022368612.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 59 200 participants were included. Bedtime dosing was significantly associated with less incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.70-0.91), P = 0.0007] compared with morning dosing; however, there was no statistically significant difference between bedtime and morning dosing, regarding all-cause mortality [RR: 0.77 with 95% CI (0.51-1.16), P = 0.21], cardiovascular mortality [RR: 0.65 with 95% CI (0.35-1.21), P = 0.17], major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56-1.10), P = 0.16], heart failure [RR: 0.68 with 95% CI (0.42-1.09), P = 0.11], cerebrovascular accidents [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.53-1.22), P = 0.30], coronary revascularization [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.50-1.24), P = 0.30}, and angina [RR: 0.91 with 95% CI (0.55-1.50), P = 0.70].

CONCLUSION

Evidence about the comparative efficacy of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensives is still uncertain. However, bedtime dosing significantly reduced MI, which warrants more robust RCTs to validate.

The Association between Vascular Abnormalities and Glaucoma-What Comes First?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. While intraocular pressure (IOP) presents a major risk factor, the underlying pathophysiology still remains largely unclear. The correlation between vascular abnormalities and glaucoma has been deliberated for decades. Evidence for a role played by vascular factors in the pathogenesis of glaucomatous neurodegeneration has already been postulated. In addition, the fact that glaucoma causes both structural and functional changes to retinal blood vessels has been described. This review aims to investigate the published evidence concerning the relationship between vascular abnormalities and glaucoma, and to provide an overview of the "chicken or egg" dilemma in glaucoma. In this study, several biomarkers of glaucoma progression from a vascular perspective, including endothelin-1 (ET-1), nitric oxide, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), were identified and subsequently assessed for their potential as pharmacological intervention targets.

Increased Risks of Open-Angle Glaucoma in Untreated Hypertension

PURPOSE

Hypertension (HTN) has been associated with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), but whether elevated blood pressure (BP) alone is associated with OAG is unknown. Whether stage 1 hypertension, as per the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) BP guidelines, increases the risk of the disease is uncertain.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational, cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 360,330 subjects who were ≥40 years of age and not taking antihypertensive or antiglaucoma drugs at the time of health examinations between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003, were included. Subjects were categorized based on their untreated BP, into normal BP (systolic BP [SBP] <120 and diastolic BP [DBP] <80 mm Hg; n = 104,304), elevated BP (SBP 120-129 and DBP <80 mm Hg; n = 33,139), stage 1 HTN (SBP 130-139 or DBP 80-89 mm Hg; n = 122,534), or stage 2 HTN (SBP ≥140 or DBP ≥90mm Hg; n = 100,353). Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HR) of OAG risk.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects was 51.17 ± 8.97 years, and 56.2% were male. During a mean follow-up period of 11.76 ± 1.37 years, 12,841 subjects (3.56%) were diagnosed with OAG. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.056 (0.985-1.132) for elevated BP, 1.101(1.050-1.155) for stage 1 HTN, and 1.114(1.060-1.170) for stage 2 HTN with normal BP as the reference.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for OAG becomes greater with increases in untreated BP. Stage 1 HTN per the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guidelines is a significant risk factor for OAG.

Update on trials examining effects of night-time blood pressure lowering drug treatment on prevention of cardiovascular disease

Current evidence on benefits of night-time blood pressure (BP) lowering drug treatment on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention attributable to the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Effects of Chronotherapy (MAPEC) trial and Bedtime hypertension treatment improves cardiovascular risk reduction (Hygia) trials has raised concern on their validity and methodology. In this commentary, the authors have updated the progress of the ongoing trials that were planned to examine the effect of night-time BP lowering drug treatment on CVD prevention. As compared to MAPEC and Hygia trials, three pragmatic trials the Blood Pressure Medication Timing (BPMedtime) trial (US), the Treatment In Morning versus Evening (TIME) trial (UK), Bedmed and Bedmed-frail (Canada) were planned without ambulatory BP monitoring. The BPMedtime trial was stopped after the pilot phase due to underestimated sample size and insufficient funds. TIME trial (UK) had a similar issue when changing the sample size from 10,269 to more than 20,000 participants. The TIME trial was completed and the initial results showing that protection against heart attack, stroke and vascular death is not affected by whether antihypertensive medications are taken in the morning or evening. The full study of the TIME trial is published in December 2022. Bedmed and Bedmed-frail trials are ongoing and will be completed in 2023. Time of taking BP lowering drug should be determined by patients at their convenience to improve the adherence. There was no difference in adverse effects of taking BP lowering drugs at night or morning. Evidence on the effect of night-time treatment on CVD events is inconsistent. The results from ongoing trials in Canada will contribute evidence to the use of BP lowering drug treatment for the prevention of CVD.

Ingestion-time differences in the pharmacodynamics of dual-combination hypertension therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published human trials

The pharmacodynamics of hypertension medications can be significantly affected by circadian rhythms in the biological mechanisms of the 24 h blood pressure (BP) pattern. Hypertension guidelines fail to recommend the time of day when patients, including those who require treatment with multiple medications, are to ingest BP-lowering therapy. We conducted a systematic review of published prospective trials that investigated hypertension medications for ingestion-time differences in BP-lowering, safety, patient adherence, and markers of target organ pathology. Among the search-retried 155 trials, 17 published between 1991 and 2020 totaling 1,508 hypertensive participants concerned the differential ingestion-time dependent effects of 14 unique dual-combination therapies. All but one (94.1%) of the trials, involving 98.5% of the total number of investigated individuals, reported clinically and statistically significant benefits - including enhanced reduction of asleep BP without induction of sleep-time hypotension, reduced prevalence of BP non-dipping, decreased adverse effects, improved kidney function, and reduced cardiac pathology - when dual-combination hypertension medications were ingested at-bedtime/evening rather than upon-waking/morning. A systematic and comprehensive review of the literature published in the past three decades reveals no single dual-combination hypertension trial reported significantly better benefit of the still conventional, yet unjustified by medical evidence, upon-waking/morning hypertension treatment scheme.

Ingestion-time differences in the pharmacodynamics of hypertension medications: Systematic review of human chronopharmacology trials

Pharmacokinetics of hypertension medications is significantly affected by circadian rhythms that influence absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination. Furthermore, their pharmacodynamics is affected by ingestion-time differences in kinetics and circadian rhythms comprising the biological mechanism of the 24 h blood pressure (BP) pattern. However, hypertension guidelines do not recommend the time to treat patients with medications. We conducted a systematic review of published evidence regarding ingestion-time differences of hypertension medications and their combinations on ambulatory BP-lowering, safety, and markers of target organ pathology. Some 153 trials published between 1976 and 2020, totaling 23,869 hypertensive individuals, evaluated 37 different single and 14 dual-fixed combination therapies. The vast (83.7%) majority of the trials report clinically and statistically significant benefits - including enhanced reduction of asleep BP without inducing sleep-time hypotension, reduced prevalence of the higher cardiovascular disease risk BP non-dipping 24 h profile, decreased incidence of adverse effects, improved renal function, and reduced cardiac pathology - when hypertension medications are ingested at-bedtime/evening rather than upon-waking/morning. Non-substantiated treatment-time difference in effects by the small proportion (16.3%) of published trials is likely explained by deficiencies of study design and conduct. Systematic and comprehensive review of the literature published the past 45 years reveals no single study reported significantly better benefit of the still conventional, yet unjustified by medical evidence, upon-waking/morning hypertension treatment schedule.

Association of Systemic Hypertension With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: A Population-based Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

To examine the association between systemic hypertension (HTN) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using Taiwan's nationwide health insurance claims data.

DESIGN

A case-control study.

METHODS

Data for this case-control study were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for all 112,929 newly diagnosed patients with POAG from January 2010 through December 2015 (cases), and 449,840 propensity score-matched controls from Taiwan's National Health Insurance system. We performed multiple logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds (ORs) of prior HTN among cases vs controls.

RESULTS

Of total 562,300 study patients, 296,975 (52.81%) had HTN prior to the index date, 63,528 (56.49%) among cases and 233,447 (51.90%) among controls (P < .001). POAG was significantly associated with prior HTN (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.29-1.33) after adjusting for age, sex, monthly income, geographic location and residential urbanization level, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, coronary heart disease, migraine, hypotension, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

POAG is associated with pre-existing HTN, suggesting that internal medicine/family medicine physicians should refer patients with hypertension periodically for regular ophthalmological examinations and ophthalmologists should alert patients with glaucoma to have their blood pressure regularly monitored.

Cardiovascular Disease Predicts Structural and Functional Progression in Early Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between cardiovascular disease and baseline structural defects and disease progression in glaucoma.

DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal study of preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma.

PARTICIPANTS

Two thousand six hundred twenty-eight eyes from 1314 participants recruited to the Progression Risk of Glaucoma: Relevant SNPs with Significant Association (PROGRESSA) study were evaluated for baseline and longitudinal structural thinning using spectral-domain OCT and for visual field progression on Humphrey visual field (HVF) assessment.

METHODS

Patients were classified as either predominantly macula ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL), predominantly peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), or both mGCIPL and pRNFL structural change at enrollment, and then evaluated for longitudinal OCT or HVF progression. Cardiovascular disease and medication characteristics of the participants were compared with a reference group of stable patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

OCT and HVF baseline status and longitudinal progression.

RESULTS

After accounting for age and cardiovascular characteristics, patients with predominantly mGCIPL thinning at baseline showed a higher prevalence of hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-4.41; P < 0.001), antihypertensive use (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.20-3.46; P = 0.008), and statin use (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.07-3.66; P = 0.029) than reference patients. Patients with predominantly pRNFL thinning exhibited a comparable prevalence of cardiovascular disease or medication with reference patients. Review of longitudinal OCT and HVF data (mean follow-up, 5.34 ± 1.29 years) showed that hypertension was associated with an increased risk of both OCT (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.17-2.75; P = 0.006) and HVF progression (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.18-3.15; P = 0.013). A 1-standard deviation (approximately 21 mmHg) increase in systolic blood pressure at baseline was associated with a greater risk of OCT progression (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.63; P = 0.041) and HVF progression (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01-1.73; P = 0.043). The association between systolic blood pressure and structural progression was comparable to that observed between intraocular pressure and structural progression (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67; P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular disease is an important risk factor for glaucoma progression.

Effect of systemic antihypertensives on change in intraocular pressure after initiating topical prostaglandins for primary open-angle glaucoma

Purpose

There is a limited understanding of factors that influence the efficacy of topical glaucoma medication. Our study is a long-term, case–control analysis of how systemic antihypertensive (anti-HTN) medications influence the change in IOP after initiating prostaglandin (PG) drop therapy.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review of 3,781 patients was performed on patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma suspect that progressed to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) by ICD-9 codes over a 10-year period. Inclusion criteria consisted of the following: 1) progression from preglaucoma to glaucoma diagnosis in a time span of ≥6 months; 2) two visual fields recorded between these dates; 3) initial average IOP of both eyes of ≥21 mmHg; and 4) initiation of topical PG therapy alone. IOP (in mmHg) was measured at initiation of PG drops and at next visit.

Results

One hundred eleven patients were qualified for analysis. Patients not on anti-HTN agents had an average IOP decrease of 6.38±0.56 mmHg. Comparatively, patients on anti-HTN agents had an average IOP decrease of 6.66±0.48 mmHg (P=0.61). In addition, there was no statistical difference between IOP decrease between patients on single vs multiple systemic anti-HTN agents (P=0.85). There were eight nonresponders to PGs on no anti-HTN medications and 12 nonresponders on anti-HTN medication (P=0.55).

Conclusion

Systemic anti-HTN medication use did not significantly impact IOP reduction after topical PG initiation for POAG. Additionally, nonresponse to PG therapy was not correlated to systemic anti-HTN use.

Blood pressure and glaucoma: At the crossroads between cardiology and ophthalmology

Glaucoma is an optic nerve neuropathy of undetermined cause. Although many mechanisms are thought to be involved in the development and progression of the disease, only an increased intraocular pressure has been established as a clinically significant modifiable risk factor. Nevertheless, up to 40% of patients develop glaucoma without evidence of increased intraocular pressure. Ample evidence suggests that alterations in the control of arterial blood might negatively affect optic nerve function. However, evidence-based guidelines on the management of arterial blood pressure in glaucoma patients are lacking. Regrettably, intraocular pressure is generally not included as a secondary end-point in clinical trials on arterial hypertension. Considering the relative simplicity of intraocular pressure measurements and large number of patients included in hypertension studies, the benefits of including intraocular pressure as a secondary end-point could be of a great value for improving care for glaucoma patients. Therefore, closer collaboration between cardiologists and ophthalmologists is needed.

Efficacy and safety of nighttime dosing of antihypertensives: review of the literature and design of a pragmatic clinical trial

Blood pressure exhibits circadian variability, and nighttime blood pressure is one of the best predictors of cardiovascular (CV) events. Adults with hypertension who lack a nighttime dipping pattern are at particularly high risk. Several studies have found that bedtime dosing of antihypertensive agents reduces sleep blood pressure and improves the dipping pattern in nondippers. One small study and 2 substudies of diabetes and chronic kidney disease suggest that bedtime dosing of ≥ 1 antihypertensives significantly reduced CV events. A Cochrane review of 5 studies found no difference in adverse events between morning and evening dosing. However, several evaluations in ophthalmology have found that nocturnal arterial hypotension precipitated ocular vascular disorders such as ischemic optic neuropathy. Some authors have suggested that additional studies of nighttime dosing of antihypertensive agents that evaluate CV events need to be conducted. The authors describe a randomized controlled pragmatic trial that is being planned at the University of Iowa and Duke University. Patients with hypertension and other comorbid conditions will be randomized to either continue morning dosing of all antihypertensive agents or to switch their nondiuretic medications to bedtime dosing. Patients will be followed for 36 to 42 months. This study will determine whether nighttime dosing reduces CV risk when compared with traditional morning dosing of antihypertensive agents.