Admissions to a Norwegian emergency psychiatric ward: patient characteristics and referring agents. A prospective study

Is this an underestimated problem? Using coercion before psychiatric hospitalization

BACKGROUND

The Mental Health Act (1994) specifies rules of use for direct coercion in Poland. Coercion in psychiatric wards may improve the safety of patients and surroundings but influences compliance and satisfaction with treatment. Legal (formal) coercion regulated by law isn't the one and only form of coercion used on people with mental disorders. Pressure, threats and orders from relatives and medical staff in relation to procedures of referral and admission to a psychiatric hospital can be described as informal coercion. In Poland there aren't many studies on the use of coercion before psychiatric hospitalization, which justifies the need to conduct this research.

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the extent of coercive measures used prior to admission and the relationships between the use of direct coercion and selected demographic-clinical factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was conducted as part of statutory research at the 4th Clinic of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology at the Bielanski Hospital in Warsaw from 1.06.13. to 31.05.14. on all the patients admitted to the psychiatric ward in that period. We gathered data on the extent of coercion in the process of hospital referral, and demographic and clinical data was collected. The following tools were used: a specially prepared questionnaire on the extent of the coercion used prior to admission at the hospital, questionnaire on demographic and clinical data, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).

RESULTS

Coercion prior to admission to the hospital was applied to 53 % of patients, 45 % received informal coercion, and 8 % were physically coerced. Man were more likely to be coerced than women, for people diagnosed with F10-F19 and F20-F29, physical coercion was used more frequently than in patients with other disorders. Patients undergoing informal coercion on the way to the hospital were significantly older than those who weren't exposed on coercion or experienced physical coercion. Higher severity of almost all BPRS subscales (without anxiety and depression subscale) be found in patients who were coerced on their way to hospital than in patients who were not coerced. In the analysis of the logistic regression use of coercion prior to admission to the hospital was positively associated with admission without consent, severity of negative symptoms as well as negatively associated with severity of depression symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The high probability of experience coercion before admission to the psychiatric hospital suggests more attention should be paid to procedures connected with referral and transport before psychiatric hospitalization.

Length of Involuntary Hospitalization Related to the Referring Physician's Psychiatric Emergency Experience

Although involuntary commitment (IC) is a serious intervention in psychiatry and must always be regarded as an emergency measure, the knowledge about influencing factors is limited. Aims were to test the hypothesis that duration of involuntary hospitalization and associated parameters differ for IC's mandated by physicians with or with less routine experience in psychiatric emergency situations. Duration of involuntary hospitalization and duration until day-passes of 508 patients with IC at the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich were analyzed using a generalized linear model. Durations of involuntary hospitalization and time until day-passes were significantly shorter in patients referred by physicians with less routine experience in psychiatric emergency situations than compared to experienced physicians. Shorter hospitalizations following IC by less-experienced physicians suggest that some IC's might be unnecessary. A specific training or restriction to physicians being capable of conducting IC could decrease the rate of IC.

Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics associated with involuntary admissions in Switzerland between 2008 and 2016: An observational cohort study before and after implementation of the new legislation

BACKGROUND

Involuntary admission (IA) for psychiatric treatment has a history of controversial discussions. We aimed to describe characteristics of a cohort of involuntarily compared to voluntarily admitted patients regarding clinical and socio-demographic characteristics before and after implementation of the new legislation.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, routine data of 15'125 patients who were admitted to the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich between 2008 and 2016 were analyzed using a series of generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

At least one IA occurred in 4'560 patients (30.1%). Of the 31'508 admissions 8'843 (28.1%) were involuntary. In the final multivariable model, being a tourist (OR = 3.5) or an asylum seeker (OR = 2.3), having a schizophrenic disorder (OR = 2.1), or a bipolar disorder (OR = 1.8) contributed most to our model. Male gender, higher age, prescription of neuroleptics (all OR < 2.0) as well as having a depressive disorder, prescription of psychotherapy, prescription of antidepressants and admission after implementation of the new legislation (all OR > 0.6) were also weakly associated with IA.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides schizophrenic or bipolar disorders, a small group of patients had an increased risk for IA due to non-clinical parameters (i.e. tourists and asylum seekers). Knowledge about risk factors should be used for the development of multi-level strategies to prevent frequent (involuntary) hospitalizations in patients at risk. On the organizational level, we could show that the new legislation decreased the risk for IA, and therefore may have succeeded in strengthening patient autonomy.

Involuntary admission for psychiatric treatment: Compliance with the law and legal considerations in referring physicians with different professional backgrounds

BACKGROUND

Involuntary admission (IA) for psychiatric treatment is a massive restriction of human rights. Therefore, its execution is regulated by law. During executing IAs referring physicians find themselves in a dual role: support of patients in the recovery process but also safe-keeper of society. In Zurich, Switzerland the law stipulates that physicians regardless of their medical specialization may admit patients who suffer from a mental disorder, mental disability or severe neglect involuntarily if care cannot be provided otherwise, regardless of their decision-making capacity. The referring physician is obliged to examine the patients, hear their views on the IA, inform them about the following steps and about their right of appeal at the civil court. We aimed to assess whether referring physicians can comply with those legal requirements for an IA. Additionally, we examined whether legal considerations differed according to the physicians` professional backgrounds and attitudes towards coercion in general.

METHODS

We invited physicians from different in- and outpatient settings who executed IAs to the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich to participate in a newly developed online survey. We used correlation analysis, chi-square and t-tests to analyze the responses of 43 psychiatrists with those of 64 other physicians.

RESULTS

In about 1/3 of the IAs referring physicians were not able to hear the patients' views on the IA, to inform the patients about the following steps and about their right of appeal. Psychiatrists felt more certain with the legal basis of IA compared to physicians other than psychiatrists. Nevertheless, the latter stated that the assessment of the risk for suicide and danger should not be restricted only to psychiatrists. Both groups differed in their attitudes towards coercion with psychiatrists being more critical.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions should be developed to facilitate a compliance with legal requirements during IA. Physicians who execute IAs must have a thorough knowledge of the clinical and legal basis for their actions. We recommend specialized consultation teams for the assessment of PES and regular training including ethical discussions, especially for physicians other than psychiatrists.

Mortality, morbidity and follow-up after acute poisoning by substances of abuse: A prospective observational cohort study

AIMS

Despite the excess mortality and morbidity associated with acute poisoning by substances of abuse, follow-up is frequently not organised. We assessed morbidity, including repeated poisoning, and follow-up after acute poisoning by substances of abuse through charting contacts with health services. We also charted short-term mortality.

METHODS

Patients 12 years and older treated for acute poisoning by substances of abuse at a primary care emergency outpatient clinic in Oslo, Norway, were included consecutively from October 2011 through September 2012. We retrieved information from national registers on fatalities, hospital admissions, and contacts at outpatient specialist health services and with general practitioners (GPs), during the 90 days following a poisoning episode.

RESULTS

We included 1731 patients treated for 2343 poisoning episodes. During the 90 days following the poisoning, 31% of the patients were treated at somatic hospitals, 9% admitted to psychiatric hospitals, 37% in treatment at outpatient psychiatric/addiction specialist health services, 55% saw their GP, while 34% had no follow-up. The short-term mortality rate was 2.0%, eight times higher than expected. Increasing age, suicidal intention, opioid poisoning, and severe mental illness were associated with increased risk of death. Increasing age, male gender, opioid poisoning, and severe mental illness were associated with repeated poisoning. Patients with increased risk of repeated poisoning were more likely to be in follow-up at outpatient specialist psychiatric/addiction services and in contact with their GP.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up measures seem targeted to those most in need, though one out of three had none. The mortality rate calls for concern.

Involuntary admission in Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review

Background

It is an important objective of the psychiatric services to keep the use of involuntary procedures to a minimum, as the use of coercion involves clinical, ethical, and legal issues. It has been claimed that Norway has a relatively high rate of involuntary admissions. We reviewed the peer-reviewed literature on the use of involuntary admission in Norway, with the purpose of identifying the current state of knowledge and areas in need of further research.

Methods

A systematic review following the PRISMA statement was conducted. We searched the electronic databases PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase for studies relating to involuntary admission to Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals published in the period 1 January 2001 to 8 August 2016. The database searches were supplemented with manual searches of relevant journals, reference lists, and websites.

Results

Seventy-four articles were included and grouped into six categories based on their main topics: Patients’ experiences, satisfaction and perceived coercion (21 articles), the Referral and admission process (11 articles), Rates of admission (8 articles), Characteristics of the patients (17 articles), Staff attitudes (9 articles), and Outcomes (8 articles). Four of the included articles described intervention studies. Fifty-seven of the articles had a quantitative design, 16 had a qualitative design, and one a mixed-method design. There was a broad range of topics that were studied and considerable variation in study designs. The findings were largely in line with the international literature, but the particularities of Norwegian legislation and the Norwegian health services were reflected in the literature. The four intervention studies explored interventions for reducing rates of involuntary admission, such as modifying referring routines, improving patient information procedures, and increasing patients’ say in the admission process, and represent an important avenue for future research on involuntary admission in Norway.

Conclusions

The review suggests that Norway has a relatively high rate of involuntary admissions. The identified studies represent a broad mix of topics and designs. Four intervention studies were identified. More studies with strong designs are needed to bring research on involuntary admission in Norway to a next level.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13033-018-0189-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Characteristics of Psychiatric Emergency Situations and the Decision-Making Process Leading to Involuntary Admission

Introduction: Involuntary admissions to psychiatric hospitals, regardless of their beneficial effects, violate the patients' autonomy. To keep such measures at a minimum and develop less restricting and coercive alternatives, a better understanding of the psychiatric emergency situations which end up in involuntary admissions is needed. This descriptive and exploratory study investigates the consultations leading to involuntary admission and the decision-making process of the referring physicians. Methods: We developed an online questionnaire to collect data on the characteristics of the consultation leading to an involuntary admission, including influencing factors from the referring physicians' perspective, as well as their professional background. We included 107 physicians who completed the questionnaire after they had referred patients for involuntary admission to one major psychiatric hospital in Switzerland. Results: The referring physicians were heterogeneous regarding their medical background and experience with psychiatric emergency situations. The consultations were time consuming and took place in various locations. Clinical findings, third-party anamnesis and a known psychiatric diagnosis contributed strongest to the decision to admit involuntarily. "Protection from danger to self" was named most frequently as purpose of the admission. Discussion: This study emphasizes the variety of psychiatric emergency situations leading to involuntary admissions. In most cases, several parties are involved and influence the decision together with medical and social factors. To reduce the number of involuntary admissions, alternatives for patients with a high symptom load and at risk of harming themselves are needed. Possible approaches to achieve that reduction and recommendations for further research are provided.

Voluntary or involuntary acute psychiatric hospitalization in Norway: A 24h follow up study

The Norwegian Mental Health Care Act states that patients who are involuntarily admitted to a hospital must be reevaluated by a psychiatrist or a specialist in clinical psychology within 24h to assess whether the patient fulfills the legal criteria for the psychiatric status and symptoms. International research on the use of coercive hospitalization in psychiatry is scarce, and an investigation of Norway's routine re-evaluation of involuntarily referred patients may expand knowledge about this aspect of psychiatric treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which Involuntarily Hospitalized (IH) patients were converted to a Voluntary Hospitalization (VH), and to identify predictive factors leading to conversion. The Multi-center Acute Psychiatry study (MAP) included all cases of acute consecutive psychiatric admissions across twenty Norwegian acute psychiatric units in health trusts in Norway across 3months in 2005-06, representing about 75% of the psychiatric acute emergency units in Norway. The incident of conversion from involuntarily hospitalization (IH) to voluntary hospitalization (VH) was analyzed using generalized linear mixed modeling. Out of 3338 patients referred for admission, 1468 were IH (44%) and 1870 were VH. After re-evaluation, 1148 (78.2%) remained on involuntary hospitalization, while 320 patients (21.8%) were converted to voluntary hospitalization. The predictors of conversion from involuntary to voluntary hospitalization after re-evaluation of a specialist included patients wanting admission, better scores on Global Assessment of Symptom scale, fewer hallucinations and delusions and higher alcohol intake.

CONCLUSION

The 24h re-evaluation period for patients referred for involuntary hospitalization, as stipulated by the Norwegian Mental Health Care Act, appeared to give adequate opportunity to reduce unnecessary involuntary hospitalization, while safeguarding the patient's right to VH.

Factors associated with disallowance of compulsory mental healthcare referrals

OBJECTIVE

Norwegian studies report that a substantial amount of referrals for compulsory mental health care are disallowed at specialist assessment, at a rate that varies with referring agent. Knowledge on factors associated with disallowance could improve the practice of compulsory mental health care. This study aims to examine such factors, placing particular emphasis on the impact of referring agents.

METHOD

This study utilized data from the prospective, longitudinal cohort study 'Suicidality in Psychiatric Emergency Admissions' conducted at a Norwegian psychiatric emergency unit which served approximately 400 000 inhabitants. Data on referral, admission and patient characteristics were retrieved on compulsory admissions conducted between 1 May 2005 and 30 April 2008. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses and structural multilevel modelling were performed.

RESULTS

Among 2813 compulsory admissions, 764 were disallowed. Low competence in the referring agent, high GAF S score, observed alcohol or drug intoxication, reported suicide risk, and the presence of neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders, personality disorders and other non-specified diagnoses were associated with above average disallowance frequency. Non-Norwegian ethnicity and schizophrenia spectrum disorders were associated with below average disallowance rates.

CONCLUSION

Among several factors associated with disallowance, low symptom load was the strongest, whilst referring agent competence modestly affected disallowance rate.

Involuntary psychiatric admission: how the patients are detected and the general practitioners' expectations for hospitalization. An interview-based study

BACKGROUND

In Norway, it is usually GPs that refer patients to involuntary admission. A high proportion of such referrals come from out-of-hours clinics. Little is known about who first initiate the contact between the patients and the referring doctors and which expectations the referring doctors have with respect to the involuntary admissions. The aim of the study was to examine who first detected the patients who were subsequently involuntarily admitted, and to examine the referring doctors' expectations for the admissions.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 74 doctors that had referred patients for involuntary admission at a psychiatric hospital.

RESULTS

Patients who were involuntarily admitted were detected by other branches of the health service (52 %, n = 39), family (25 %, n = 19), and the police (17 %, n = 13). The doctors mentioned these expectations for the admission (more than one expectation could be given): start treatment with neuroleptics: 58 % (n = 43), take care of the patient: 45 % (n = 34), extensive changes to the treatment regime: 37 % (n = 28), solve an acute situation: 35 % (n = 26), and clarify the diagnosis: 22 % (n = 17). Female doctors significantly more often expected that the patients would be examined and treated, while the male doctors significantly more often expected that the patients would be cared for.

CONCLUSIONS

Involuntary admissions are typically complex processes involving different people and services and patients with various needs. More knowledge about the events preceding hospitalization is needed in order to develop alternatives to involuntary admissions.

Involuntary psychiatric admission: Characteristics of the referring doctors and the doctors' experiences of being pressured

BACKGROUND

In Norway, doctors may make the decision to refer patients to involuntary psychiatric treatment. This is a difficult decision, as it involves a range of medical, legal and ethical challenges. The decision to commit is presumed based on an independent assessment of the patient and whether a set of medico-legal criteria is met.

AIMS

To examine characteristics of GPs that admitted patients involuntarily to a psychiatric hospital, and to examine how the GPs assessed this process.

METHODS

74 doctors who had referred patients to involuntary admission at one major Norwegian psychiatric hospital participated in semi-structured interviews. The questions posed were in part factual and in part about the participating doctors' assessments and considerations with respect to the involuntary admission of psychiatric patients.

RESULTS

Approximately half of the participating doctors worked at the public out-of-hours clinics, while a fifth were the patients' family doctors. Those working at the out-of-hours clinics had less work experience and fewer had prior knowledge of the patients they committed. About half the doctors felt it was difficult to apply the medico-legal criteria. More than half had felt pressured/advised to refer the patient to hospital and about half had felt pressured/advised to do so involuntarily.

CONCLUSIONS

While doctors considering the commitment of psychiatric patients are presumed to make independent assessments of patients based on medico-legal criteria, this study suggests that many doctors feel pressured to commit.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The assessment made by doctors who refer patients involuntarily to psychiatric hospital may be influenced by other parts of the health service, the patient's family and the police. Many doctors feel that it is difficult to apply the medico-legal criteria when referring patients involuntarily.

Involuntary psychiatric admission: The referring general practitioners' assessment of patients' dangerousness and need for psychiatric hospital treatment

BACKGROUND

In Norway, GPs may decide to refer patients to involuntary psychiatric treatment. Internationally, there has been a discussion regarding criteria for involuntary admission. In Norway and in other countries where the treatment criterion is still used, some have suggested its removal.

AIMS

To examine which legal criteria GPs used to refer patients to involuntary admission, whether they had thought about using a different criterion, and on which information they based their decision.

METHODS

A total of 74 doctors who had referred patients to involuntary admission at one major Norwegian psychiatric hospital participated in semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

In total, 38% (28) had applied the danger criterion only and 23% (17) had applied the treatment criterion only; 32% (24) had applied both criteria, while 7% (5) did not answer this question; 74% (55) said that they could not have chosen a different criterion; 45% (33) had based their decision on events/behaviour prior to and during the consultation, 43% (32) on events prior to the consultation only, and 8% (6) on information obtained during the consultation only; 4% (3) did not answer this question. None had used tools to aid in the assessment of danger.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The danger criterion was frequently used by the referring GPs. It is unclear how a removal of the treatment criterion from Norwegian legislation might impact clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

While the danger criterion was applied by a majority, the treatment criterion was also chosen by many and was of importance to the doctors' reasoning regarding referrals to involuntary admission. Most thought they could not have chosen a different criterion.

Factors associated with hospitalization of adult psychiatric patients: cluster analysis

OBJECTIVE

Factors associated with acute admission to inpatient psychiatric wards have been difficult to replicate, possibly reflecting methodological limitations of analyzing individual variables. The objective of this analysis was to identify factors associated with hospitalization at an inpatient psychiatric unit using cluster analytic methods.

METHODS

Demographic, admission and treatment data for all admissions to a single inpatient unit in 2010 were collected retrospectively. Cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method.

RESULTS

The initial clustering identified a high suicidality/crisis group, which then gave two further subclusters, an internalizing one characterized by affective symptoms and an externalizing one characterized by intoxication at admission, and a population with poor medication compliance that included most cases of psychosis. These subclusters had different clinical and demographic characteristics, different rates of hospital readmission and different durations of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Cluster analysis may be a useful exploratory technique to assist in planning and developing services for adult patients needing admission to a psychiatric hospital.

How Norwegian casualty clinics handle contacts related to mental illness: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Low-threshold and out-of-hours services play an important role in the emergency care for people with mental illness. In Norway casualty clinic doctors are responsible for a substantial share of acute referrals to psychiatric wards. This study's aim was to identify patients contacting the casualty clinic for mental illness related problems and study interventions and diagnoses.

METHODS

At four Norwegian casualty clinics information on treatment, diagnoses and referral were retrieved from the medical records of patients judged by doctors to present problems related to mental illness including substance misuse. Also, routine information and relation to mental illness were gathered for all consecutive contacts to the casualty clinics.

RESULTS

In the initial contacts to the casualty clinics (n = 28527) a relation to mental illness was reported in 2.5% of contacts, whereas the corresponding proportion in the doctor registered consultations, home-visits and emergency call-outs (n = 9487) was 9.3%. Compared to other contacts, mental illness contacts were relatively more urgent and more frequent during night time. Common interventions were advice from a nurse, laboratory testing, prescriptions and minor surgical treatment. A third of patients in contact with doctors were referred to in-patient treatment, mostly non-psychiatric wards. Many patients were not given diagnoses signalling mental problems. When police was involved, they often presented the patient for examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Most mental illness related contacts are managed in Norwegian casualty clinics without referral to in-patient care. The patients benefit from a wide range of interventions, of which psychiatric admission is only one.