The increasing clinical importance of alloantibodies in kidney transplantation

Quantification of Alloantibody-Mediated Cytotoxicity In Vivo

BACKGROUND

Preexisting, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are culprits of hyperacute rejection. Donor-specific antibodies are also formed de novo, and their role in acute and chronic rejection is increasingly appreciated. However, it is difficult to assess damage inflicted exclusively by DSAs when alloreactive T cell and B cell responses coincide. We reasoned that allosensitization with "costimulation-deficient" cells should induce DSA synthesis but not naive cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) precursors' priming via direct allorecognition. Accordingly, we have developed a novel model to quantify DSA-mediated cytotoxicity in vivo.

METHODS

C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were sensitized with H-2 kidney epithelial cells, and a cytofluorimetric killing assay was tailored to the measurement of allocytotoxicity. We took cell/complement depletion, costimulation blockade, and serum transfer approaches to reveal the mediators of cytotoxicity. "Third-party" controls and a skin allotransplantation model were used to confirm DSAs' specificity for allo-major histocompatibility complex. We validated our experimental approach in other mouse strains primed with different allogeneic cell types, including endothelial cells. To demonstrate the usefulness of our model/method for drug efficacy testing, we examined the effect of CTLA4-Ig and rapamycin on DSA-mediated cytolysis.

RESULTS

Allosensitization of MHC-disparate mouse strains with costimulation-deficient cells led to robust cytotoxicity mediated by complement-fixing DSAs and phagocytic cells. This response was independent of CTLs, natural killer or natural killer T cells. It required CD4 T cell help, CD40 signaling and CD28-based costimulation during allosensitization and could be reversed by sustained rapamycin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique model described herein should enable mechanistic studies on sensitization and effector phases of humoral alloreactivity as well as efficacy testing of future immunotherapies to prevent DSA-induced pathology.

Aging and the immune response to organ transplantation

An increasing number of older people receive organ transplants for various end-stage conditions. Although organ transplantation is an effective therapy for older patients (i.e., older than 65 years of age), such as in end-stage renal disease, this therapy has not been optimized for older patients because of our lack of understanding of the effect of aging and the immune response to organ transplantation. Here, we provide an overview of the impact of aging on both the allograft and the recipient and its effect on the immune response to organ transplantation. We describe what has been determined to date, discuss existing gaps in our knowledge, and make suggestions on necessary future studies to optimize organ transplantation for older people.

Aged B cells alter immune regulation of allografts in mice

Organ transplantation in older people is increasing, but how aging impacts B-cell responses to organ transplantation is still unknown. Here, we show that the depletion of B cells with anti-CD20 antibodies has disparate effects depending on recipient age. In young murine recipients, anti-CD20 treatment impaired the ability of immune modulation to extend skin allograft survival. In contrast, anti-CD20 treatment extended allograft survival in aged recipients treated with immune modulation. Although regulatory B-cell function and the numbers of marginal and follicular B cells were similar between age groups, a subpopulation of B cells, termed age-associated B cells (ABCs), accumulated upon aging. ABCs isolated from aged mice exhibited upregulation of CD73, CD80, CD106, and TLR2 and an increased capacity to augment T-cell alloimmunity compared to ABCs from young mice. Importantly, ABCs from aged, but not young, mice impaired the ability of immune modulation to enhance allograft survival after adoptive transfer into young transplant recipients. Our study indicates that ABCs impair the immune regulation of allografts. Thus, recipient age needs to be considered when proposing B-cell-depleting immune therapy.

Antibody-mediated rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last five decades, the attention of nephrologists has focused on cellular rejection which was considered to be responsible for the early loss of function of the transplanted kidney. The use of new drugs in different combinations with steroids resulted in an improved short-term survival of the graft, which has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejections. The main problem now, however, is ensuring the long-term survival of the transplanted kidney. This has become the challenge of the new millennium.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current literature clearly focuses on donor-specific alloantibodies, directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antigens [donor-specific antibodies (DSA)], which have been shown to play an important role in graft dysfunction, longevity, and loss. To mitigate allograft loss due to antibodies, it is important to treat the source of antibody production, the plasma cells. Drugs used prior to 2007, such as Rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins, and plasmapheresis, lack effects on these long-lived plasma cells. Their ability to remove DSA is incomplete and/or cost prohibitive. Since 2007, Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has been used to deplete plasma cells, thus eliminating the synthesis of DSA.

SUMMARY

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is common in patients with DSA and is associated with a poor prognosis. Novel medications that target each step of AMR pathogenesis have been produced and are successful when compared with more traditional therapies.