Effectiveness and safety of dydrogesterone in regularization of menstrual cycle: a post-marketing study

Real-world utilization pattern of dydrogesterone in 7287 Indian women with obstetric and gynecological conditions: data from multicentric, retrospective study

Objective

Despite the literature on dydrogesterone, studies on dydrogesterone utilization patterns are largely lacking in Indian patients.

Methods

This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, and descriptive study across 817 centers in India. Data of patients who received dydrogesterone in past and provided consent for future use of their medical record for research purpose was were retrieved and analyzed.

Results

Data of 7287 subjects (aged 29.55±4.84 years) was analyzed. Threatened abortion was the most common indication for which the subjects received dydrogesterone (46.9%) followed by recurrent pregnancy loss. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), thyroid disorders and anemia were the most common comorbid conditions and prior pregnancy loss, advanced maternal age and obesity were the most common risk factors seen in subjects who received dydrogesterone. Total 27.5% of subjects received a loading dose of dydrogesterone, and majority (64%) received 40 mg as loading dose. 10 mg dose was used as maintenance or regular dose in 81.4% of the subjects. Twice daily (BID) was the most common dosing frequency (66.6%). The most common concomitant medications being taken by the subjects on dydrogesterone included folic acid (45.1%), iron supplements (30.3%) and calcium and vitamin D3 supplements (25.5%). Another progesterone preparation (oral, injection, vaginal, tubal) other than dydrogesterone was used concurrently in 7.8% of subjects.

Conclusion

The study helped to identify the patient population that is benefitted by dydrogesterone and the preferred indications, risk factors, comorbid conditions and concomitant medication used in this patient population at real-life scenario.

Comparison of Dydrogesterone and GnRH-a Effects After Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Stage III and IV Endometriosis

Objective

To compare the spontaneous pregnancy rates between dydrogesterone and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) treatments in patients with endometriosis stage III and IV after laparoscopy.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with endometriosis stage III and IV administered laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Totally 151 cases were divided into two groups according to postoperative medication, including the study (70 cases) and control (81 cases) groups treated with dydrogesterone and GnRH-a, respectively. The spontaneous pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were assessed within 12 months.

Results

Totally 49 patients had spontaneous pregnancy. Among them, there were 31 cases in the dydrogesterone group (spontaneous pregnancy rate of 44.3%, 31/70), including 25 live birth cases (35.7%, 25/70), 4 miscarriage cases, and 2 ectopic pregnancy cases. The time to conception was 1-10 months (median value of 5 months). Totally 18 cases in the GnRH-a group had spontaneous pregnancy (22.2%, 18/81), including 16 live birth cases (19.8%, 16/81). 81) and 2 miscarriage cases; the time to conception was 3-11 months (median value of 6 months). There were significant differences in spontaneous pregnancy rate and cumulative spontaneous pregnancy rate between the two groups (P = 0.005 and 0.003, respectively).

Conclusion

Dydrogesterone after laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometriosis stage III and IV improved the natural pregnancy rate.

A Comparison of Oral Dydrogesterone with Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal-Phase Support in In vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

The quality of the luteal phase is the most important issue affecting pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Luteal-phase support with the administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or progesterone improves the likelihood of pregnancy in ART. Due to disagreements regarding the best pharmaceutical form of progesterone for success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in ART methods, the present study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesterone on the outcome of pregnancy in IVF.

Materials and Methods

This unblinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Centre in Isfahan, Iran, between june 2021 and September 2021. In total, 126 couples were included in the study. All patients underwent controlled ovarian stimulation and IVF. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 63 per group). After embryo transfer, group I was treated with Cyclogest 400 mg twice daily, and group II was treated with oral Duphaston 10 mg twice daily.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the mean endometrial thickness (P = 0.613), the mean number of transferred embryos (P = 0.100), and the number of implanted embryos (P = 0.338). Additionally, no statistically significant differences in the pregnancy rate were detected between the two groups (P = 0.875).

Conclusions

The evidence from this study indicates that Duphaston is as effective as Cyclogest for luteal-phase support.

Additional dydrogesterone for the treatment of chronic endometritis treated with antibiotic in premenopausal women with endometrial polyps: a retrospective cohort study

Background

To assess the efficacy of dysdrogesterone in the treatment of chronic endometritis (CE) treated with antibiotic in premenopausal women with endometrial polyps (EPs).

Methods

Routine detection of endometrium was simultaneously conducted to determine whether there was CE by syndecan-1 (CD138), while women underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy in our hospital. Antibiotic was given for the treatment of CE. A total of 235 premenopausal women with CE who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy were enrolled in the retrospective observational study. In the control group, single antibiotic was given for the treatment of CE form January 2016 to December 2018, and in the treatment group additional dydrogesterone was used from January 2019 to November 2020. Comparison of cure rates of CE with different treatment regimens was performed.

Results

The cure rates of CE in dydrogesterone and antibiotic combination group and the single antibiotic group were 85.2% and 74.3%, respectively, with overall cure rate of 80.0% (188/235). The combination group showed better effects regarding the cure rate of CE (P < .05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the cure rate of CE was not affected by age, body mass index, number of EPs, the status of estrogen receptor and the status of progesterone receptor. Conversely, dydrogesterone and endometrial scratching were beneficial factors for cure rate increase with antibiotic treatment.

Conclusion

Combination of dydrogesterone and antibiotic was more effective for cure rate of CE than antibiotic alone in premenopausal women after hysteroscopic polypectomy. Endometrial scratching also contributed to the cure rate increase with antibiotic treatment.

Lack of analytical interference of dydrogesterone in progesterone immunoassays

OBJECTIVES

Progesterone, a sex steroid, is measured in serum by immunoassay in a variety of clinical contexts. One potential limitation of steroid hormone immunoassays is interference caused by compounds with structural similarity to the target steroid of the assay. Dydrogesterone (DYD), an orally active stereoisomer of progesterone, is used for various indications in women's health. Herein, we report a systematic in vitro investigation of potential interference of DYD and its active metabolite 20α-dihydrodydrogesterone (DHD) in seven widely used, commercially available progesterone assays.

METHODS

Routine human plasma samples were anonymized and pooled to create three graded concentration levels of progesterone (P4 high, P4 medium, P4 low). Each pooled P4 plasma sample (6-7 mL) was spiked at high, medium, and "none" concentration with DYD/DHD and was divided into 0.5 mL aliquots. The blinded aliquots were analyzed by seven different laboratories with their routine progesterone assay (six different immunoassays and one liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay, respectively) within the Dutch working group on endocrine laboratory diagnostics of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessments in Medical Laboratories.

RESULTS

The sample recovery rate (P4 result obtained for sample spiked with DYD/DHD, divided by the result obtained for the corresponding sample with no DYD/DHD × 100) was within a ±10% window for the medium and high P4 concentrations, but more variable for the low P4 samples. The latter is, however, attributable to high inter- and intra-method variability at low P4 concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not indicate any relevant interference of DYD/DHD within routinely used progesterone assays.

Dydrogesterone after 60 years: a glance at the safety profile

OBJECTIVE

To provide an evidence-based safety and tolerability overview of dydrogesterone under various progesterone-deficient conditions as a commemoration of its role in managing women's reproductive health over the past 60 years.

METHODS

To identify relevant publications, we used a semi-systematic approach, which included performing a structured search through the PubMed and Cochrane central databases as well as an unstructured search for publications published in English from 2010 onward with human clinical data.

RESULTS

A total of 32 relevant clinical studies were identified. Results were reported in the context of overall adverse events (AEs) and segregated according to various progesterone-deficient conditions. AEs concerning breasts (breast cancer risk), the endometrium (endometrial cancer risk), venous thromboembolism risk, and cardiovascular risk were found to be minimal when dydrogesterone was used as part of a menopausal hormone therapy regimen lasting ≤260 weeks. Vagina-related AEs, such as bleeding, discharge, irritation, and difficult coitus, occurred less frequently with dydrogesterone when used as luteal phase support in the context of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs). However, other common AEs, such as headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, flatulence, and nausea, occurred more frequently with dydrogesterone. No maternal complications or congenital anomalies could be linked to dydrogesterone usage during ARTs or during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent miscarriages. Studies on dydrogesterone in endometriosis and premenstrual syndrome remain scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-approval, dydrogesterone has displayed a favorable safety and tolerability profile during its 60-year use, which is reassuring, considering its important role in managing women's reproductive health.

The effectiveness of desogestrel for endometrial protection in women with abnormal uterine bleeding-ovulatory dysfunction: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Women with chronic abnormal uterine bleeding-ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O) are at increased risk of endometrial neoplasia. We conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of two cyclic-progestin regimens orally administered 10 d/month for 6 months on endometrial protection and menstruation normalization in women with AUB-O. There were 104 premenopausal women with AUB-O randomized to desogestrel (DSG 150 µg/d, n = 50) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA 10 mg/d, n = 54) group. Both groups were comparable in age (44.8 ± 5.7 vs. 42.5 ± 7.1 years), body mass index (24.8 ± 4.7 vs. 24.9 ± 4.7 kg/m2), and AUB characteristics (100% irregular periods). The primary outcome was endometrial response rate (the proportion of patients having complete pseudodecidualization in endometrial biopsies during treatment cycle-1). The secondary outcome was clinical response rate (the proportion of progestin withdrawal bleeding episodes with acceptable bleeding characteristics during treatment cycle-2 to cycle-6). DSG was not inferior to MPA regarding the endometrial protection (endometrial response rate of 78.0% vs. 70.4%, 95% CI of difference − 9.1–24.4%, non-inferiority limit of − 10%), but it was less effective regarding the menstruation normalization (acceptable bleeding rate of 90.0% vs 96.6%, P = 0.016).

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02103764, date of approval 18 Feb 2014).

Prolonged cyclical and continuous regimens of dydrogesterone are effective for reducing chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis: results of the ORCHIDEA study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of two different treatment regimens of dydrogesterone in the management of endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain.

DESIGN

Observational, prospective cohort study over six months.

SETTING

Twenty gynecology clinics in the Russian Federation.

PATIENT(S)

Three hundred fifty women from 18 to 45 years of age with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain with or without dysmenorrhea.

INTERVENTION(S)

Dydrogesterone 10 mg 2 or 3 times daily, either between the 5th and 25th days of the menstrual cycle (prolonged cyclical treatment regimen) or continuously (continuous treatment regimen). For all patients, the data cutoff was at six months of treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Intensity of chronic pelvic pain on the 11-point numerical rating scale (after 6 months).

RESULT(S)

A marked reduction in chronic pelvic pain was observed with both the prolonged cyclical and continuous treatment regimens (mean ± standard deviation change from baseline -3.3 ± 2.2 and -3.0 ± 2.2, respectively), with no significant difference between the two groups. With both regimens, patients experienced significant improvements in the intensity of chronic pelvic pain, number of days in which analgesics were required, severity of dysmenorrhea, sexual well-being, and health-related quality-of-life parameters. A favorable safety profile of dydrogesterone was confirmed, and no serious adverse drug reactions were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION(S)

Prolonged cyclical and continuous treatment regimens of dydrogesterone therapy both demonstrated a pronounced and similar reduction in the severity of chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea and led to marked improvements in all study parameters related to quality of life and sexual well-being.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03690765.

Dydrogesterone indications beyond menopausal hormone therapy: an evidence review and woman's journey

Dydrogesterone is an orally active synthetic progestogen, with a molecular structure similar to that of natural progesterone. As dydrogesterone does not inhibit ovulation at standard doses, is devoid of estrogenic or androgenic properties, and does not induce metabolic side effects, it is suitable for use throughout a woman's lifetime, from adolescence to older age, for conditions associated with altered levels of endogenous progesterone. Aside from its well established role as a component of menopausal hormone therapy, dydrogesterone is indicated in younger women for treatment of dysmenorrhea, irregular menstrual cycles, premenstrual syndrome, and threatened or recurrent miscarriage; and is effective as luteal phase support during assisted reproduction techniques. In this narrative review, evidence is examined for use of dydrogesterone across a range of disorders affecting menses and pregnancy. A case study woven into the review illustrates the clinical uses of dydrogesterone during a young woman's journey to become a mother.

Combination of Dydrogesterone and Antibiotic Versus Antibiotic Alone for Chronic Endometritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial Study

To evaluate the impact of dydrogesterone in the treatment of chronic endometritis with antibiotic treatment in premenopausal women. A total of 188 chronic endometritis patients diagnosed by syndecan-1 (CD138) expression were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial study. Dydrogesterone and doxycycline were given in the treatment group, while single antibiotic was given in the control group. CD138, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor expression in samples of the endometrium was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Comparison of chronic endometritis cure rate between groups was performed based on conversion of CD138 expression from positive to negative. The 188 cases included in the statistical analysis consisted of 93 cases in the treatment group and 95 cases in the control group. The cure rates of chronic endometritis in the dydrogesterone and antibiotic combination group and the single antibiotic group were 86.0% (80/93) and 72.6% (69/95), respectively, with an overall cure rate of 79.3% (149/188). The dydrogesterone and antibiotic combination group showed better effects regarding the cure rate of chronic endometritis (P<.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the cure rate of chronic endometritis was not affected by age, clinical diagnosis, hysteroscopic resection, estrogen receptor status, or progesterone receptor status (all P>.05). Addition of dydrogesterone was effective for the treatment of chronic endometritis with antibiotic treatment in premenopausal women. The study was retrospectively registered to Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000040227) in November 2020.

A prospective, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy of dydrogesterone in the treatment of endometrial polyps

OBJECT

To evaluate the efficacy of dydrogesterone for the treatment of premenopausal patients with endometrial polyps (EPs).

METHODS

A single-center, open-label, prospective, single-arm clinical treatment trial was conducted in patients of reproductive age with EP(s). Patients were prescribed dydrogesterone from day 15 to day 24 of the menstrual cycle over a period of 3 months. At the 3-month follow-up, the efficacy of dydrogesterone was evaluated based on changes in self-report symptoms and ultrasonographic characteristics. The predictive factors of efficacy as well as the predictive value of the significant factors were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included. Improvements in both symptoms and ultrasound findings occurred in 31 patients, achieving an efficacy rate of 51.67%. Of 41 patients with clinical presentations, 39 (95.1%) reported improvements in symptoms. In terms of ultrasound findings, 33 (55%) of patients demonstrated improvements. Significant decreases were observed in the mean endometrial thickness (1.17 ± 0.33 cm vs 0.90 ± 0.35 cm, p < .001) and polyp size (1.10 ± 0.34 cm vs 0.74 ± 0.65 cm, p = .001) after the application of dydrogesterone. Age (p = .006), polyp size (p = .006), and blood flow within polyps (p = .035) were significant predictors of dydrogesterone efficacy. These factors, when combined, demonstrated a good predictive value ([area under the curve (AUC)=0.81]).

CONCLUSION

Dydrogesterone is effective in the management of EPs in premenopausal patients. Age, polyp size and blood flow should be taken into consideration when prescribing dydrogesterone for this population of women.

Dydrogesterone treatment for menstrual-cycle regularization in abnormal uterine bleeding – ovulation dysfunction patients

BACKGROUND

Dydrogesterone has shown significant efficacy in treatment of irregular menstrual cycle due to abnormal uterine bleeding - ovulation dysfunction (AUB-O), but there were few relevant studies. This observational study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of dydrogesterone for the treatment of Chinese patients with AUB-O.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of dydrogesterone on menstrual-cycle (MC) regularization and metabolism in the patients with AUB-O.

METHODS

A prospective, non-interventional, single-arm, post-marketing observational study was conducted. Chinese women aged 16 years or above with AUB-O who had been prescribed dydrogesterone were enrolled. The patients were treated with dydrogesterone 10 mg from day 16 to day 25 of each cycle, consecutively for at least 3 cycles. The main outcome was defined as the percentage of patients whose MCs returned to normal (defined as 21 d < menstrual cycle ≤ 35 d) after three cycles of dydrogesterone treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen women with AUB-O were enrolled in the present study. Of 89 patients who completed treatment, 72 (80.9%) achieved a regular MC at the end of the 3^rd circle. The level of androgen, including testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, declined significantly (P = 0.01 and 0.031, respectively), whereas other hormone levels remained steady. During the treatment, 44/80 (55.0%) subjects in the per-protocol set had reported biphasic basal body temperature.

CONCLUSION

Dydrogesterone therapy was effective in achieving MC regularization for Chinese patients with AUB-O.