Therapeutic rather than prophylactic platelet transfusion policy for severe thrombocytopenia during liver transplantation

Implementation of a Bleeding Management Algorithm in Liver Transplantation: A Pilot Study

Objectives

The aims of the study were to compare the consumption of blood products before and after the implementation of a bleeding management algorithm in patients undergoing liver transplantation and to determine the feasibility of a multicentre, randomized study.

Background

Liver transplantation remains the only curative therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, but it carries a high risk of surgical bleeding.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective study of patients treated before (group 1) and after (group 2) implementation of a haemostatic algorithm guided by viscoelastic testing, including use of lyophilized coagulation factor concentrates (prothrombin complex and fibrinogen concentrates). Primary outcome was the number of units of blood products transfused in 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, mortality, and cost.

Results

Data from 30 consecutive patients was analysed; 14 in group 1 and 16 in group 2. Baseline data were similar between groups. Median total blood product consumption 24 h after surgery was 33 U (IQR: 11-57) in group 1 and 1.5 (0-23.5) in group 2 (p = 0.028). Significantly fewer units of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate were transfused in group 2 versus group 1. There was no significant difference in complications, hospital stay, or in-hospital mortality between groups. The cost of haemostatic therapy was non-significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (7,400 vs. 15,500 USD; p = 0.454).

Conclusion

The haemostatic management algorithm was associated with a significant reduction in blood product use during 24 h after liver transplantation. This study demonstrated the feasibility and provided a sample size calculation for a larger, randomized study.

Transfusion therapy of neonatal and paediatric patients: They are not just little adults

Patient blood management (PBM) strategies are needed in the neonate and paediatric population, given that haemoglobin thresholds used are often higher than recommended by evidence, with exposure of children to potential complications without meaningful benefit. A literature review was performed on the following topics: evidence-based transfusions of blood components and pharmaceutical agents. Other topics reviewed included perioperative coagulation assessment and perioperative PBM. The Transfusion and Anaemia Expertise Initiative (TAXI) consortium published a consensus statement addressing haemoglobin (Hb) transfusion threshold in multiple subsets of patients. A multicentre trial (PlaNeT-2) reported a higher risk of bleeding and death or serious new bleeding among infants who received platelet transfusion at a higher (50 000/μl) compared to a lower (25 000/μl) threshold. Recent data support the use of a restrictive transfusion threshold of 25 000/μl for prophylactic platelet transfusions in preterm neonates. The TAXI-CAB consortium mentioned that in critically ill paediatric patients undergoing invasive procedures outside of the operating room, platelet transfusion might be considered when the platelet count is less than or equal to 20 000/μl and there is no benefit of platelet transfusion when the platelet count is more than 50 000/μl. There are limited controlled studies in paediatric and neonatal population regarding plasma transfusion. Blood conservation strategies to minimise allogenic blood exposure are essential to positive patient outcomes neonatal and paediatric transfusion practices have changed significantly in recent years since randomised controlled trials were published to guide practice. Additional studies are needed in order to provide practice change recommendations.

Intraoperative transfusion management, antifibrinolytic therapy, coagulation monitoring and the impact on short-term outcomes after liver transplantation-A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is frequently complicated by coagulopathy associated with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), that is, often multifactorial.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to identify evidence based intraoperative transfusion and coagulation management strategies that improve immediate and short-term outcomes after LT.

METHODS

PRISMA-guidelines and GRADE-approach were followed. Three subquestions were formulated. (Q); Q1: transfusion management; Q2: antifibrinolytic therapy; and Q3: coagulation monitoring.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included for Q1, six for Q2, and 10 for Q3. Q1: PRBC and platelet transfusions were associated with higher mortality. The use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fibrinogen concentrate (FC) were not associated with reductions in intraoperative transfusion or increased thrombotic events. The use of cell salvage was not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence or mortality. Cell salvage and transfusion education significantly decreased blood product transfusions. Q2: Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid (TXA) were not associated with decreased blood product transfusion, improvements in patient or graft survival, or increases in thrombotic events. Q3: Viscoelastic testing (VET) was associated with decreased allogeneic blood product transfusion compared to conventional coagulation tests (CCT) and is likely to be cost-effective. Coagulation management guided by VET may be associated with increases in FC and PCC use.

CONCLUSION

Q1: A specific blood product transfusion practice is not recommended (QOE; low | Recommendation; weak). Cell salvage and educational interventions are recommended (QOE: low | Grade of Recommendation: moderate). Q2: The routine use of antifibrinolytics is not recommended (QOE; low | Recommendation; weak). Q3: The use of VET is recommended (QOE; low-moderate | Recommendation; strong).

Anesthetic Management of Living-Donor Renal Transplantation in a Patient With Epstein Syndrome Using Rotational Thromboelastometry: A Case Report

Epstein syndrome is a myosin heavy chain 9 (MYH9)-related disorder characterized by hearing loss and macrothrombocytopenia with renal failure, which usually requires platelet transfusion during surgery. We report the case of a 22-year-old man who underwent living-donor renal transplantation without platelet transfusion using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) monitoring. His intraoperative laboratory coagulation findings were a platelet count of 28–31 × 10⁹/L based on microscopy and fibrinogen of 256 mg/dL. However, his extrinsic pathway evaluations by ROTEM were normal. The estimated blood loss during the operation was 150 mL, and the patient showed no bleeding complications without platelet transfusion.

The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care viscoelastic method and enables to assess viscoelastic profiles of whole blood in various clinical settings. ROTEM-guided bleeding management has become an essential part of patient blood management (PBM) which is an important concept in improving patient safety. Here, ROTEM testing and hemostatic interventions should be linked by evidence-based, setting-specific algorithms adapted to the specific patient population of the hospitals and the local availability of hemostatic interventions. Accordingly, ROTEM-guided algorithms implement the concept of personalized or precision medicine in perioperative bleeding management (‘theranostic’ approach). ROTEM-guided PBM has been shown to be effective in reducing bleeding, transfusion requirements, complication rates, and health care costs. Accordingly, several randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses, and health technology assessments provided evidence that using ROTEM-guided algorithms in bleeding patients resulted in improved patient’s safety and outcomes including perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the implementation of ROTEM in the PBM concept requires adequate technical and interpretation training, education and logistics, as well as interdisciplinary communication and collaboration.

Risk Factors for Transfusion after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Background

Transfusion of blood products during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although risk factors associated with intraoperative transfusion requirements have been widely assessed, published data on the prediction of postoperative transfusion requirements are sparse.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for postoperative allogeneic transfusion requirements in OLT.

Methods

Clinical characteristics and intraoperative parameters of 645 consecutive adult patients undergoing OLT were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the main determinants for postoperative transfusion requirements.

Results

Determinants of postoperative transfusion requirements of any blood product in the postoperative period were the number of blood products transfused in the intraoperative period (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.28), warm ischemia time (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08), MELD score (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) and hepatocellular carcinoma (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.72). A dose-dependent effect between the number of units transfused in the intraoperative period and transfusion requirements in the postoperative period was also observed. The relative risk of postoperative allogeneic transfusion of any blood component was 5.9 (95% CI 3.4-10.4) for patients who received 1-2 units in the intraoperative period, 7.3 (95% CI 3.6-14.7) for those who received 3-5 units in the intraoperative period, and 11.1 (95% CI 4.7-26.4) for those who received 6 or more units, when compared to no intraoperative blood transfusion.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated an association between intraoperative transfusion and warm ischemia time with postoperative transfusion requirements. The identification of risk factors for transfusion in the postoperative period may improve management of these patients by increasing awareness to bleeding complications in this high-risk population and by expanding hemostasis monitoring to the postoperative period.

Perioperative Thromboelastometry for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients with a Tendency to Hypercoagulability: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

Hypercoagulability can lead to serious thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative coagulation status in liver transplant recipients with a tendency to hypercoagulability.

Methods

In a prospective observational study (South African Cochrane Registry 201405000814129), 151 potential liver transplant recipients were screened for thrombophilic factors from October 2014 to June 2017, and 57 potential recipients fulfilled the inclusion criterion of presenting two or more of the following thrombophilic factors: low protein C, low protein S, low anti-thrombin, increased homocystein, increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, increased lupus anticoagulant, and positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Seven patients were excluded from the study because they fulfilled the exclusion criteria of cancelling the liver transplantation, oral anticoagulation, or intraoperative treatment with rFVIIa. Accordingly, 50 patients were included in the final analysis. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) (EXTEM, INTEM and FIBTEM) and conventional coagulation tests (CCT) were performed preoperatively, during the anhepatic phase, post reperfusion, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3 and 7. ROTEM was used to guide blood product transfusion. Heparin was infused (60-180 U/kg/day) postoperatively for 3 days and then was replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (20 mg/12 h).

Results

FIBTEM MCF significantly increased postoperatively above reference range on POD 7 despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations (p < 0.05). Both EXTEM and INTEM demonstrated significant changes with the phases of transplantation (p < 0.05), but with no intra- or postoperative hypercoagulability observed. INTEM CT (reference range, 100-240 s) normalized on POD 3 and 7 (196.1 ± 69.0 and 182.7 ± 63.8 s, respectively), despite prolonged aPTT (59.7 ± 18.7 and 46.4 ± 15.7 s, respectively; reference range, 20-40 s). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) were reported in 12.0% and 2.0%, respectively, mainly after critical care discharge and with high FIBTEM MCF values in 57% on POD 3 and 86% on POD 7. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses of FIBTEM MCF were significant predictors for thromboembolic events with optimum cut-off, area under the curve and standard error on POD 3 (>23 mm, 0.779 and 0.097; p = 0.004) and POD 7 (>28 mm, 0.706 and 0.089; p = 0.020). Red blood cells (mean ± SD, 8.68 ± 5.81 units) were transfused in 76%, fresh frozen plasma (8.26 ± 4.14 units) in 62%, and cryoprecipitate (12.0 ± 3.68 units) in 28% of recipients. None of the recipients received intraoperative platelet transfusion or any postoperative transfusion. Main transplant indication was hepatitis C infection in 82%. 76% of recipients included in this highly selected patient population showed increased lupus anticoagulant, 2% increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, 20% increased homocysteine, 74% decreased anti-thrombin, 78% decreased protein C, 34% decreased protein S, and 24% a positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Overall 1-year survival was 62%.

Conclusion

A significant postoperative step-wise increase in FIBTEM MCF beyond the reference range was observed despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations, and FIBTEM MCF was a predictor for thromboembolic events in this study population, particularly after POD 3 and 7 on surgical wards when CCTs failed to detect this condition. However, the predictive value of FIBTEM MCF for postoperative HAT and PVT needs to be confirmed in a larger patient population. A ROTEM-guided anticoagulation regime needs to be developed and investigated in future studies.

Prophylactic platelet transfusions prior to surgery for people with a low platelet count

BACKGROUND

People with thrombocytopenia often require a surgical procedure. A low platelet count is a relative contraindication to surgery due to the risk of bleeding. Platelet transfusions are used in clinical practice to prevent and treat bleeding in people with thrombocytopenia. Current practice in many countries is to correct thrombocytopenia with platelet transfusions prior to surgery. Alternatives to platelet transfusion are also used prior surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of prophylactic platelet transfusions prior to surgery for people with a low platelet count.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following major data bases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 2), PubMed (e-publications only), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the Transfusion Evidence Library and ongoing trial databases to 11 December 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), as well as non-RCTs and controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs), that met Cochrane EPOC (Effective Practice and Organisation of Care) criteria, that involved the transfusion of platelets prior to surgery (any dose, at any time, single or multiple) in people with low platelet counts. We excluded studies on people with a low platelet count who were actively bleeding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane for data collection. We were only able to combine data for two outcomes and we presented the rest of the findings in a narrative form.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five RCTs, all conducted in adults; there were no eligible non-randomised studies. Three completed trials enrolled 180 adults and two ongoing trials aim to include 627 participants. The completed trials were conducted between 2005 and 2009. The two ongoing trials are scheduled to complete recruitment by October 2019. One trial compared prophylactic platelet transfusions to no transfusion in people with thrombocytopenia in an intensive care unit (ICU). Two small trials, 108 participants, compared prophylactic platelet transfusions to other alternative treatments in people with liver disease. One trial compared desmopressin to fresh frozen plasma or one unit of platelet transfusion or both prior to surgery. The second trial compared platelet transfusion prior to surgery with two types of thrombopoietin mimetics: romiplostim and eltrombopag. None of the included trials were free from methodological bias. No included trials compared different platelet count thresholds for administering a prophylactic platelet transfusion prior to surgery. None of the included trials reported on all the review outcomes and the overall quality per reported outcome was very low.None of the three completed trials reported: all-cause mortality at 90 days post surgery; mortality secondary to bleeding, thromboembolism or infection; number of red cell or platelet transfusions per participant; length of hospital stay; or quality of life.None of the trials included children or people who needed major surgery or emergency surgical procedures.Platelet transfusion versus no platelet transfusion (1 trial, 72 participants)We were very uncertain whether giving a platelet transfusion prior to surgery had any effect on all-cause mortality within 30 days (1 trial, 72 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 1.45; very-low quality evidence). We were very uncertain whether giving a platelet transfusion prior to surgery had any effect on the risk of major (1 trial, 64 participants; RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.29 to 8.92; very low-quality evidence), or minor bleeding (1 trial, 64 participants; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.85; very-low quality evidence). No serious adverse events occurred in either study arm (1 trial, 72 participants, very low-quality evidence).Platelet transfusion versus alternative to platelet transfusion (2 trials, 108 participants)We were very uncertain whether giving a platelet transfusion prior to surgery compared to an alternative has any effect on the risk of major (2 trials, 108 participants; no events; very low-quality evidence), or minor bleeding (desmopressin: 1 trial, 36 participants; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.23; very-low quality evidence: thrombopoietin mimetics: 1 trial, 65 participants; no events; very-low quality evidence). We were very uncertain whether there was a difference in transfusion-related adverse effects between the platelet transfused group and the alternative treatment group (desmopressin: 1 trial, 36 participants; RR 2.70, 95% CI 0.12 to 62.17; very-low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this review were based on three small trials involving minor surgery in adults with thrombocytopenia. We found insufficient evidence to recommend the administration of preprocedure prophylactic platelet transfusions in this situation with a lack of evidence that transfusion resulted in a reduction in postoperative bleeding or all-cause mortality. The small number of trials meeting the inclusion criteria and the limitation in reported outcomes across the trials precluded meta-analysis for most outcomes. Further adequately powered trials, in people of all ages, of prophylactic platelet transfusions compared with no transfusion, other alternative treatments, and considering different platelet thresholds prior to planned and emergency surgical procedures are required. Future trials should include major surgery and report on bleeding, adverse effects, mortality (as a long-term outcome) after surgery, duration of hospital stay and quality of life measures.

Perioperative Thromboelastometry for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients with a Tendency to Hypercoagulability: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

Hypercoagulability can lead to serious thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative coagulation status in liver transplant recipients with a tendency to hypercoagulability.

Methods

In a prospective observational study (South African Cochrane Registry 201405000814129), 151 potential liver transplant recipients were screened for thrombophilic factors from October 2014 to June 2017, and 57 potential recipients fulfilled the inclusion criterion of presenting two or more of the following thrombophilic factors: low protein C, low protein S, low anti-thrombin, increased homocystein, increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, increased lupus anticoagulant, and positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Seven patients were excluded from the study because they fulfilled the exclusion criteria of cancelling the liver transplantation, oral anticoagulation, or intraoperative treatment with rFVIIa. Accordingly, 50 patients were included in the final analysis. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) (EXTEM, INTEM and FIBTEM) and conventional coagulation tests (CCT) were performed preoperatively, during the anhepatic phase, post reperfusion, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3 and 7. ROTEM was used to guide blood product transfusion. Heparin was infused (60-180 U/kg/day) postoperatively for 3 days and then was replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (20 mg/12 h).

Results

FIBTEM MCF significantly increased postoperatively above reference range on POD 7 despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations (p < 0.05). Both EXTEM and INTEM demonstrated significant changes with the phases of transplantation (p < 0.05), but with no intra- or postoperative hypercoagulability observed. INTEM CT (reference range, 100-240 s) normalized on POD 3 and 7 (196.1 ± 69.0 and 182.7 ± 63.8 s, respectively), despite prolonged aPTT (59.7 ± 18.7 and 46.4 ± 15.7 s, respectively; reference range, 20-40 s). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) were reported in 12.0% and 2.0%, respectively, mainly after critical care discharge and with high FIBTEM MCF values in 57% on POD 3 and 86% on POD 7. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses of FIBTEM MCF were significant predictors for thromboembolic events with optimum cut-off, area under the curve and standard error on POD 3 (>23 mm, 0.779 and 0.097; p = 0.004) and POD 7 (>28 mm, 0.706 and 0.089; p = 0.020). Red blood cells (mean ± SD, 8.68 ± 5.81 units) were transfused in 76%, fresh frozen plasma (8.26 ± 4.14 units) in 62%, and cryoprecipitate (12.0 ± 3.68 units) in 28% of recipients. None of the recipients received intraoperative platelet transfusion or any postoperative transfusion. Main transplant indication was hepatitis C infection in 82%. 76% of recipients included in this highly selected patient population showed increased lupus anticoagulant, 2% increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, 20% increased homocysteine, 74% decreased anti-thrombin, 78% decreased protein C, 34% decreased protein S, and 24% a positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Overall 1-year survival was 62%.

Conclusion

A significant postoperative step-wise increase in FIBTEM MCF beyond the reference range was observed despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations, and FIBTEM MCF was a predictor for thromboembolic events in this study population, particularly after POD 3 and 7 on surgical wards when CCTs failed to detect this condition. However, the predictive value of FIBTEM MCF for postoperative HAT and PVT needs to be confirmed in a larger patient population. A ROTEM-guided anticoagulation regime needs to be developed and investigated in future studies.

Is Coagulopathy an Appropriate Therapeutic Target During Critical Illness Such as Trauma or Sepsis?

Coagulopathy is a common and vexing clinical problem in critically ill patients. Recently, major advances focused on the treatment of coagulopathy in trauma and sepsis have emerged. However, the targeting of coagulopathy with blood product transfusion and drugs directed at attenuating the physiologic response to these conditions has major potential risk to the patient. Therefore, the identification of coagulopathy as a clinical target is an area of uncertainty and controversy. To analyze the state of the science regarding coagulopathy in critical illness, a symposium addressing the problem was organized at the 39th annual meeting of the Shock Society in the summer of 2016. This manuscript synthesizes the viewpoints of the four expert panelists at the debate and presents an overview of the potential positive and negative consequences of targeting coagulopathy in trauma and sepsis.

Platelet Transfusions in Pediatric Intensive Care

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the determinants of platelet transfusion in a PICU and determine whether there exists an association between platelet transfusion and adverse outcomes.

DESIGN

Prospective observational single center study, combined with a self-administered survey.

SETTING

PICU of Sainte-Justine Hospital, a university-affiliated tertiary care institution.

PATIENTS

All children admitted to the PICU from April 2009 to April 2010.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 842 consecutive PICU admissions, 60 patients (7.1%) received at least one platelet transfusion while in PICU. In the univariate analysis, significant determinants for platelet transfusion were admission Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score greater than 10 (odds ratio, 6.80; 95% CI, 2.5-18.3; p < 0.01) and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores greater than 20 (odds ratio, 26.9; 95% CI, 8.88-81.5; p < 0.01), history of malignancy (odds ratio, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.43-10.68; p < 0.01), thrombocytopenia (platelet count, < 50 × 10/L or < 50,000/mm) (odds ratio, 141; 95% CI, 50.4-394.5; p < 0.01), use of heparin (odds ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.40-6.37; p < 0.01), shock (odds ratio, 5.73; 95% CI, 2.85-11.5; p < 0.01), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (odds ratio, 10.41; 95% CI, 5.89-10.40; p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, platelet count less than 50 × 10/L (odds ratio, 138; 95% CI, 42.6-449; p < 0.01) and age less than 12 months (odds ratio, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.03-9.10; p = 0.02) remained statistically significant determinants. The attending physicians were asked why they gave a platelet transfusion; the most frequent justification was prophylactic platelet transfusion in presence of thrombocytopenia with an average pretransfusion platelet count of 32 ± 27 × 10/L (median, 21), followed by active bleeding with an average pretransfusion platelet count of 76 ± 39 × 10/L (median, 72). Platelet transfusions were associated with the subsequent development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.18-5.43; p = 0.03) and mortality (odds ratio, 10.1; 95% CI, 4.48-22.7; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among children, 7.1% received at least one platelet transfusion while in PICU. Thrombocytopenia and active bleeding were significant determinants of platelet transfusion. Platelet transfusions were associated with the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and increased mortality.

Reducing transfusion requirements in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) was historically associated with massive blood loss and transfusion. Over the past two decades transfusion requirements have reduced dramatically and increasingly transfusion-free transplantation is a reality. Both bleeding and transfusion are associated with adverse outcomes in LT. Minimising bleeding and reducing unnecessary transfusions are therefore key goals in the perioperative period. As the understanding of the causes of bleeding has evolved so too have techniques to minimize or reduce the impact of blood loss. Surgical “piggyback” techniques, anaesthetic low central venous pressure and haemodilution strategies and the use of autologous cell salvage, point of care monitoring and targeted correction of coagulopathy, particularly through use of factor concentrates, have all contributed to declining reliance on allogenic blood products. Pre-emptive management of preoperative anaemia and adoption of more restrictive transfusion thresholds is increasingly common as patient blood management (PBM) gains momentum. Despite progress, increasing use of marginal grafts and transplantation of sicker recipients will continue to present new challenges in bleeding and transfusion management. Variation in practice across different centres and within the literature demonstrates the current lack of clear transfusion guidance. In this article we summarise the causes and predictors of bleeding and present the evidence for a variety of PBM strategies in LT.

Tracheostomy in intensive care unit patients can be performed without bleeding complications in case of normal thromboelastometry results (EXTEM CT) despite increased PT-INR: a prospective pilot study

Background

Coagulopathy is often accompanied by prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) in septic and nonseptic patients in intensive care unit (ICU). The conventional way to correct the coagulopathy is to administer fresh frozen plasma (FFP) before invasive procedures to minimise the risk of bleeding. However, prolonged PT can be present even in hypercoagulation status, resulting in unnecessary administration of FFP. In the present study, we have assessed the reliability of thromboelastometry in case of prolonged PT and the relationship to bleeding complications during surgical tracheostomy.

Methods

The study was conducted during the period between April 2013 and April 2014 in patients undergoing surgical tracheostomy. Coagulation status was assessed using PT, and the status was reassessed by thromboelastometry for prolonged PT. Tracheostomy was performed in patients with normal thromboelastometry results without administering FFP.

Results

Tracheostomy was performed in total 119 patients. Normal value of PT as measured by international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.2 was found in 64 (54 %) patients, while prolonged INR > 1.2 was found in 55 (46 %) patients. Patients with INR ≥ 1.3 (with INR min- 1.3, max- 1.84, and median- 1.48) were further analysed by thromboelastometry. Despite prolonged INR, thromboelastometry results were in normal ranges in all cases except one. With normal thromboelastometry, tracheostomy was performed safely without any bleeding complication.

Conclusions

Surgical tracheostomy in septic and nonseptic patients can be performed without bleeding complications in case of normal thromboelastometry results (EXTEM CT) despite increased PT-INR. This method can help physicians to reduce unnecessary administration of FFP in patients.

Prophylactic plasma and platelet transfusion in the critically Ill patient: just useless and expensive or even harmful?

It is still common practice to correct abnormal standard laboratory test results, such as increased INR or low platelet count, prior to invasive interventions, such as tracheostomy, central venous catheter insertion or liver biopsy, in critically ill patients. Data suggest that 30-90 % of plasma transfused for these indications is unnecessary and puts the patient at risk. Plasma transfusion is associated with a high risk of transfusion-associated adverse events such as transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion-related lung injury (TRALI), transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM), and anaphylaxis/allergic reactions. Therefore, the avoidance of inappropriate plasma transfusion bears a high potential of improving patient outcomes. The prospective study by Durila et al., published recently in BMC Anesthesiology, provides evidence that tracheostomies can be performed without prophylactic plasma transfusion and bleeding complications in critically ill patients despite increased INR in case of normal thromboelastometry (ROTEM) results. Thromboelastometry-based restrictive transfusion management helped avoid unnecessary plasma and platelet transfusion, and should reduce the incidence of transfusion-related adverse events and transfusion-associated hospital costs. Therefore, the authors believe that thromboelastometry-based strategies should be implemented to optimize patient blood management in perioperative medicine.

Preoperative Thromboelastometry as a Predictor of Transfusion Requirements during Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The ability to predict transfusion requirements may improve perioperative bleeding management as an integral part of a patient blood management program. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate preoperative thromboelastometry as a predictor of transfusion requirements for adult living donor liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

The correlation between preoperative thromboelastometry variables in 100 adult living donor liver transplant recipients and intraoperative blood transfusion requirements was examined by univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis. Thresholds of thromboelastometric parameters for prediction of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets, and cryoprecipitate transfusion requirements were determined with receiver operating characteristics analysis. The attending anesthetists were blinded to the preoperative thromboelastometric analysis. However, a thromboelastometry-guided transfusion algorithm with predefined trigger values was used intraoperatively. The transfusion triggers in this algorithm did not change during the study period.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis confirmed significant correlations between PRBCs, FFP, platelets or cryoprecipitate transfusion requirements and most thromboelastometric variables. Backward stepwise logistic regression indicated that EXTEM coagulation time (CT), maximum clot firmness (MCF) and INTEM CT, clot formation time (CFT) and MCF are independent predictors for PRBC transfusion. EXTEM CT, CFT and FIBTEM MCF are independent predictors for FFP transfusion. Only EXTEM and INTEM MCF were independent predictors of platelet transfusion. EXTEM CFT and MCF, INTEM CT, CFT and MCF as well as FIBTEM MCF are independent predictors for cryoprecipitate transfusion. Thromboelastometry-based regression equation accounted for 63% of PRBC, 83% of FFP, 61% of cryoprecipitate, and 44% of platelet transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative thromboelastometric analysis is helpful to predict transfusion requirements in adult living donor liver transplant recipients. This may allow for better preparation and less cross-matching prior to surgery. The findings of our study need to be re-validated in a second prospective patient population.

Toward a patient-based paradigm for blood transfusion

The current “manufacturing paradigm” of transfusion practice has detached transfusion from the clinical environment. As an example, fresh whole blood in large-volume hemorrhage may be superior to whole blood reconstituted from multiple components. Multicomponent apheresis can overcome logistical difficulties in matching patient needs with fresh component availability and can deliver the benefits of fresh whole blood. Because of the different transfusion needs of patients in emerging economies and the vulnerability of these blood systems to emerging infections, fresh whole blood and multicomponent apheresis can better meet patient needs when compared with transplants of the “manufacturing paradigm”. We propose that patient blood management, along with panels of repeat, paid, accredited apheresis and fresh whole-blood donors can be used in emerging economies to support decentralized blood services. This alternative transfusion–medicine paradigm could eventually also be adopted by established economies to focus transfusion medicine on local patient needs and to alleviate the problem of the aging volunteer donor base.