Original Article: Streptokinase Modifies in Vitro Platelet Aggregation by Two Mechanisms: Reduced Aggregation due to Fibrinogenolysis and Enhanced Aggregation via an Immunological Reaction

FcγRIIa - dependent platelet activation identified in COVID-19 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia-, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, streptokinase- and anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex-induced platelet activation

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was caused by the coronavirus - severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was globally responsible for remarkable morbidity and mortality. Several highly effective vaccines for COVID-19 were developed and disseminated worldwide within an unprecedented timescale. Rare but dangerous clotting and thrombocytopenia events, and subsequent coagulation abnormalities, have been reported after massive vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Soon after their global rollout, reports of a morbid clinical syndrome following vaccination with adenovirus-DNA-based vaccines appeared. In the spring of 2021, reports of a novel, rare and morbid clinical syndrome, with clinically devastating and fatal complication after vaccination with adenovirus-based coronavirus vaccines (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson and Astra-Zeneca vaccines) led to a brief suspension of their use by several countries. Those complications were associated with unusual cerebral and splanchnic venous thrombosis, and circulating autoantibodies directed against anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4), a protein secreted from platelets, leading to the designation: Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT). The reported VITT incidence remains very low and does not affect the overall benefit of immunization, however, if left untreated, VITT can be debilitating or even fatal. VITT resembled specific adverse drugs' reactions that also involved the production of autoantibodies and subsequent abnormal platelet activation through platelet FcγRIIa. These unusual but well-documented drug reactions were heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), streptokinase- (SK), and anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex- (APSAC) associated with platelet-activating antibodies. There was considerable overlapping of clinical features between VITT, COVID-19 and these adverse drugs' reactions. We review the phenomenon of VITT against the backdrop of shared and common mechanisms that underlie HIT-, SK-, and APSAC-platelet FcγRIIa-dependent platelet activation. An understanding of VITT's pathogenesis may be achieved by comparing and contrasting VITT-, HIT-, SK- and APSAC-induced platelet activation mechanisms, their respective physiopathology and similarities. Discussing these conditions in parallel provides insight into complex immunological disorders and diseases associated with abnormal hemostasis and thrombosis in particular.

An in vitro study of the effects of t-PA and tranexamic acid on whole blood coagulation and fibrinolysis

AIMS

Acute traumatic coagulopathy is characterised by fibrinolysis and low fibrinogen. It is unclear how much fibrinogenolysis contributes to reduce fibrinogen levels. The study aim was to: investigate in vitro the effects of tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) and tranexamic acid (TXA) on coagulation and fibrinolysis.

METHODS

Whole blood was spiked with varying t-PA concentrations. Clauss fibrinogen levels and thrombelastography (TEG, Haemonetics) were performed, including functional fibrinogen level (FLEV). TXA effects were assessed using four TXA concentrations. Recorded parameters from kaolin activated TEG included maximal amplitude (MA), clot strength (G), percentage lysis (LY). Plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAP), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), prothrombin fragment 1+2 (PF1+2), factor V and factor VIII levels were all measured.

RESULTS

t-PA induced fibrinolysis: it increased PAP and LY, but decreased MA and G. t-PA induced fibrinogenolysis, with a concentration-dependant decrease in fibrinogen from 2.7 (2.6-3.1) to 0.8 (0.8-0.9) g/L with 60 nM t-PA. FLEV and fibrinogen levels were well correlated. High t-PA doses increased PF1+2, decreased ETP of 19% and FVIII of 63% but not FV. TXA had no effect on plasmin generation as evidenced by no change in PAP. It corrected LY, MA and G and partly protected fibrinogen against fibrinogenolysis: 0.03 mg/mL TXA reduced the fibrinogen fall induced by t-PA 20 nM from 43% to 14%. TXA halved the FVIII fall and increased ETP.

CONCLUSIONS

t-PA induced plasminogen activation and fibrinogenolysis in a concentration-dependant manner. TXA did not affect plasmin activation but reduced fibrinogenolysis. These results suggest that TXA given early in bleeding patients may prevent fibrinogenolysis.

Antistreptokinase platelet-activating antibodies are common and heterogeneous

BACKGROUND

Platelet activation by antistreptokinase (SK) antibodies could impair the clinical effect of SK administration.

OBJECTIVE

To better describe anti-SK antibodies with particular emphasis on procoagulant activities as a result of platelet activation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sera were collected from 146 patients with coronary artery disease: non-SK-treated, 95 from mainland France, 31 from French Polynesia; 20 patients from mainland in year 2 after SK treatment. Serum-induced SK-dependent platelet activation resulting in procoagulant activities was assessed with washed platelets from five donors representative of the known patterns of reactivities to IgG.

RESULTS

Concentrations (2-5252 microg mL(-1)) and fibrinolytic neutralization titres (< 10 to > 1280) were found in the expected wide range and correlated (rho = 0.66, P < 0.0001). Platelet activation was detected with 145 samples, but varied in intensity and pattern (depending on the donors), although there was no systematic hierarchy; it was presumably due to IgG (inhibited by an IgG Fc receptor-blocking antibody and recovered in the IgG fraction) and only partially affected by aspirin. Marked platelet activation could be detected in samples with concentration as low as 2 microg mL(-1), and/or no detectable neutralizing titers. The way of immunization to SK was not found to influence the functional profile of antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Anti-SK platelet-activating antibodies are widespread, heterogeneous, poorly predictable on the basis of their antifibrinolytic effect and strong enough to trigger procoagulant activities. Their clinical relevance should be formally assessed, using patients' own platelets for detection owing to the variation of platelet reactivity.

Platelet activity and antibody titers after exposure to streptokinase or streptococcal infection

INTRODUCTION

Streptokinase use, in acute myocardial infarction, is hindered by failure to reperfuse (60%) and early reocclusion (16%). This phenomenon may, among other causes, be due to systemic inactivation of streptokinase, as well as streptokinase-induced platelet aggregation and clot propagation from antibodies to streptokinase produced after streptokinase administration or streptococcal infections. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation and aggregation after administration of SK or development of a streptococcal infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 45 normal volunteers (Control group), as well as 45 patients who had received streptokinase (Streptokinase group) and 13 who had suffered a severe streptococcal infection (Streptococcal infection group) within the past 3 years. Extent of streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation and aggregation, as well as anti-streptokinase antibody and streptokinase resistance titers (lowest streptokinase concentration to cause clot lysis within 10 min) were measured.

RESULTS

Whereas streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation was observed in 49% of streptokinase patients and in only 17% and 15% of streptococcal infection patients and normal volunteers (p<0.05 Streptokinase vs. Control and Streptokinase vs. Streptococcal infection), streptokinase-induced platelet aggregation was observed in 23% of streptokinase patients and streptococcal infection patients, and in none of the control patients (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Streptokinase-induced, antibody-mediated, platelet activation and aggregation occur in patients with high titers of anti-streptokinase antibody and may play a role in failure of streptokinase therapy. Streptococcal infection patients behave like streptokinase patients in terms of the reactivity of their platelets to subsequent streptokinase dose in vitro.