1
|
Chakraborty A, Pal A, Saha BB. A Critical Review of the Removal of Radionuclides from Wastewater Employing Activated Carbon as an Adsorbent. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 15:8818. [PMID: 36556624 PMCID: PMC9788631 DOI: 10.3390/ma15248818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Radionuclide-contaminated water is carcinogenic and poses numerous severe health risks and environmental dangers. The activated carbon (AC)-based adsorption technique has great potential for treating radionuclide-contaminated water due to its simple design, high efficiency, wide pH range, quickness, low cost and environmental friendliness. This critical review first provides a brief overview of the concerned radionuclides with their associated health hazards as well as different removal techniques and their efficacy of removing them. Following this overview, this study summarizes the surface characteristics and adsorption capabilities of AC derived from different biomass precursors. It compares the adsorption performance of AC to other adsorbents, such as zeolite, graphene, carbon nano-tubes and metal-organic frameworks. Furthermore, this study highlights the different factors that influence the physical characteristics of AC and adsorption capacity, including contact time, solution pH, initial concentration of radionuclides, the initial dosage of the adsorbent, and adsorption temperature. The theoretical models of adsorption isotherm and kinetics, along with their fitting parameter values for AC/radionuclide pairs, are also reviewed. Finally, the modification procedures of pristine AC, factors determining AC characteristics and the impact of modifying agents on the adsorption ability of AC are elucidated in this study; therefore, further research and development can be promoted for designing a highly efficient and practical adsorption-based radionuclide removal system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik Chakraborty
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
| | - Animesh Pal
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
- International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| | - Bidyut Baran Saha
- International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khalafalla MS. Biotechnological recovery of uranium (VI) from Abu Zeneima spent ore residue using green lixiviant. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10967-022-08249-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AbstractPromising green leaching technique was used by Humic acid (HA) for removing uranium from Abu Zeneima spent residue for environmental safety and cost-effective leaching. The studied residue is outlet from vat leaching process using sulfuric acid leaching of carbonaceous shale ore material with initial uranium assays 185 ppm, which representing a hazardous waste. The overall leaching efficiency assaying 93% of uranium using humic acid leaching at curing temperature 70 °C, 13% HA with S/L ratio of 1/1.5 for 15 day. Kinetic study of leaching process proved diffusion controlling mechanism with activated energy 10.297 kJ/mol. Finally; 98% of uranium was extracted using Amberlite IRA- 400 resin with purity of 97.3%.
Collapse
|
3
|
Boice JD. The Likelihood of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Genetic Disease (Transgenerational Effects) from Exposure to Radioactive Fallout from the 1945 Trinity Atomic Bomb Test. HEALTH PHYSICS 2020; 119:494-503. [PMID: 32881736 PMCID: PMC7497471 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The potential health consequences of the Trinity nuclear weapon test of 16 July 1945 at Alamogordo, New Mexico, are challenging to assess. Population data are available for mortality but not for cancer incidence for New Mexico residents for the first 25 y after the test, and the estimates of radiation dose to the nearby population are lower than the cumulative dose received from ubiquitous natural background radiation. Despite the estimates of low population exposures, it is believed by some that cancer rates in counties near the Trinity test site (located in Socorro County) are elevated compared with other locations across the state. Further, there is a concern about adverse pregnancy outcomes and genetic diseases (transgenerational or heritable effects) related to population exposure to fallout radiation. The possibility of an intergenerational effect has long been a concern of exposed populations, e.g., Japanese atomic bomb survivors, survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer, radiation workers, and environmentally exposed groups. In this paper, the likelihood of discernible transgenerational effects is discounted because (1) in all large-scale comprehensive studies of exposed populations, no heritable genetic effects have been demonstrated in children of exposed parents; (2) the distribution of estimated doses from Trinity is much lower than in other studied populations where no transgenerational effects have been observed; and (3) there is no evidence of increased cancer rates among the scientific, military, and professional participants at the Trinity test and at other nuclear weapons tests who received much higher doses than New Mexico residents living downwind of the Trinity site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Boice
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD
- Vanderbilt University Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meistrich ML. Risks of genetic damage in offspring conceived using spermatozoa produced during chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Andrology 2020; 8:545-558. [PMID: 31821745 DOI: 10.1111/andr.12740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men who have just started cytotoxic therapy for cancer are uncertain and concerned about whether spermatozoa collected or pregnancies occurring during therapy might be transmitting genetic damage to offspring. There are no comprehensive guidelines on the risks of different doses of the various cytotoxic, and usually genotoxic, antineoplastic agents. OBJECTIVES To develop a schema showing the risks of mutagenic damage when spermatozoa, exposed to various genotoxic agents during spermatogenesis, are collected or used to produce a pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed updating the data on genetic and epigenetic effects of genotoxic agents on animal and human spermatozoa exposed during spermatogenic development. RESULTS Relevant data on human spermatozoa and offspring are extremely limited, but there are extensive genetic studies in experimental animals that define sensitivities for specific drugs and times. The animal data were extrapolated to humans based on the stage when the cells were exposed and the relative kinetics of spermatogenesis and were consistent with the limited human data. In humans, alkylating agents and radiation should already induce a high risk of mutations in spermatozoa produced within 1 or 2 weeks after initiation of therapy. Topoisomerase II inhibitors and possibly microtubule inhibitors produce the greatest risk at weeks 5-7 of therapy. Nucleoside analogs, antimetabolites, and bleomycin exert their mutagenic effects on spermatozoa collected at 7-10 weeks of therapy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS A schema showing the time from initiation of therapy at which specific antineoplastic agents can cause significant levels of genetic damage in conceptuses and live offspring was developed. The estimates and methods for computing the level of such risk from an individual patient's treatment regimen will enable patients and counselors to make informed decisions on the use of spermatozoa or continuation of a pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin L Meistrich
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dubrova Y. Mutation Induction in Humans and Mice: Where Are We Now? Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11111708. [PMID: 31683966 PMCID: PMC6895811 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The analysis of mutation induction in human families exposed to mutagens provides the only source of reliable estimates of factors contributing to the genetic risk of human exposure to mutagens. In this paper, I briefly summarize the results of recent studies on the pattern of mutation induction in the human and mouse germline. The results of recent studies on the genome-wide effects of exposure to mutagens on mutation induction in the mammalian germline are presented and discussed. Lastly, this review also addresses the issue of transgenerational effects of parental exposure to mutagens on mutation rates in their non-exposed offspring, which are known as transgenerational instability. The possible contribution of transgenerational instability to the genetic risk of human exposure to mutagens is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri Dubrova
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nori Nakamura
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, RERF, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kojima Y, Yokoya S, Kurita N, Idaka T, Ishikawa T, Tanaka H, Ezawa Y, Ohto H. Cryptorchidism after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident:causation or coincidence? Fukushima J Med Sci 2019; 65:76-98. [PMID: 31915325 PMCID: PMC7012587 DOI: 10.5387/fms.2019-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Cryptorchidism (undescended testes) is among the most common congenital diseases in male children. Although many factors have been linked to the incidence of cryptorchidism, and testicular androgen plays a key role in its pathogenesis, the cause remains unknown in most cases. Recently, a Japanese group published a speculative paper entitled, "Nationwide increase in cryptorchidism after the Fukushima nuclear accident." Although the authors implicated radionuclides emitted from the Fukushima accident as contributing to an increased incidence of cryptorchidism, they failed to establish biological plausibility for their hypothesis, and glossed over an abundance of evidence and expert opinion to the contrary. We assessed the adequacy of their study in terms of design setting, data analysis, and its conclusion from various perspectives. Numerous factors must be considered, including genetic, environmental, maternal/fetal, and social factors associated with the reporting of cryptorchidism. Other investigators have established that the doses of external and internal radiation exposure in both Fukushima prefecture and the whole of Japan after the accident are too low to affect testicular descent during fetal periods;thus, a putative association can be theoretically and empirically rejected. Alternative explanations exist for the reported estimates of increased cryptorchidism surgeries in the years following Japan's 2011 earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear crisis. Data from independent sources cast doubt on the extent to which cryptorchidism increased, if at all. In any case, evidence that radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant could cause cryptorchidism is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiyuki Kojima
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
| | - Susumu Yokoya
- Thyroid and Endocrine Center, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
| | - Noriaki Kurita
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
- Department of Innovative Research and Education for Clinicians and Trainees (DiRECT), Fukushima Medical University Hospital
- Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CiRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University
| | - Takayuki Idaka
- Medical Research Center, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine
| | - Tetsuo Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Physics and Chemistry, Fukushima Medical University
| | - Hideaki Tanaka
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fukushima Medical University Hospital
| | - Yoshiko Ezawa
- Medical Affairs Division, Fukushima Medical University Hospital
| | - Hitoshi Ohto
- Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Dorp W, Haupt R, Anderson RA, Mulder RL, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Su HI, Winther JF, Hudson MM, Levine JM, Wallace WH. Reproductive Function and Outcomes in Female Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer: A Review. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2169-2180. [PMID: 29874135 PMCID: PMC7098836 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.3441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Some survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer are at increased risk of gonadal dysfunction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We reviewed currently available literature that evaluated reproductive function and pregnancy outcomes of female cancer survivors diagnosed before the age of 25 years. High-dose alkylating agent chemotherapy and abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy adversely affect gonadal function in a dose-related fashion, with older age at exposure conferring greater risk as a result of the age-related decline in ovarian reserve. Gonadal injury clinically manifests as ovarian hormone insufficiency (delayed or arrested puberty, premature ovarian insufficiency, or premature menopause) and infertility. The effect of molecular-targeted agents on ovarian function has not been established. For female cancer survivors who maintain fertility, overall pregnancy (relative risk, 0.67 to 0.81) and live birth rates (hazard ratio, 0.79 to 0.82) are lower than those in the general public. Pregnancy in cancer survivors also may be associated with risks to both the mother and the fetus related to miscarriage; preterm birth; and, rarely, cardiomyopathy. Women at risk for these complications require preconception assessment and counseling from both obstetricians and oncology providers. The risk for inherited genetic disease in offspring conceived after cancer treatment exposure is not increased. The optimization of reproductive outcomes and minimization of risks of pregnancy complications in survivors requires informed, risk-based assessment and monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy van Dorp
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Riccardo Haupt
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Richard A. Anderson
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Renee L. Mulder
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - H. Irene Su
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jeanette F. Winther
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Melissa M. Hudson
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer M. Levine
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - W. Hamish Wallace
- Wendy van Dorp, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Renee L. Mulder, Emma Children’s Hospital and Academic Medical Center; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Riccardo Haupt, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Richard A. Anderson and W. Hamish Wallace, University of Edinburgh; W. Hamish Wallace, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; H. Irene Su, University of California, San Diego, CA; Jeanette F. Winther, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Melissa M. Hudson, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Jennifer M. Levine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Qiu GH, Huang C, Zheng X, Yang X. The protective function of noncoding DNA in genome defense of eukaryotic male germ cells. Epigenomics 2018; 10:499-517. [PMID: 29616594 DOI: 10.2217/epi-2017-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral and abundant noncoding DNA has been hypothesized to protect the genome and the central protein-coding sequences against DNA damage in somatic genome. In the cytosol, invading exogenous nucleic acids may first be deactivated by small RNAs encoded by noncoding DNA via mechanisms similar to the prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas system. In the nucleus, the radicals generated by radiation in the cytosol, radiation energy and invading exogenous nucleic acids are absorbed, blocked and/or reduced by peripheral heterochromatin, and damaged DNA in heterochromatin is removed and excluded from the nucleus to the cytoplasm through nuclear pore complexes. To further strengthen the hypothesis, this review summarizes the experimental evidence supporting the protective function of noncoding DNA in the genome of male germ cells. Based on these data, this review provides evidence supporting the protective role of noncoding DNA in the genome defense of sperm genome through similar mechanisms to those of the somatic genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo-Hua Qiu
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for the Prevention & Control of Animal Infectious Diseases & Biotechnology; Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Fujian Province University; College of Life Sciences, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, Fujian, PR China
| | - Cuiqin Huang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for the Prevention & Control of Animal Infectious Diseases & Biotechnology; Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Fujian Province University; College of Life Sciences, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, Fujian, PR China
| | - Xintian Zheng
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for the Prevention & Control of Animal Infectious Diseases & Biotechnology; Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Fujian Province University; College of Life Sciences, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, Fujian, PR China
| | - Xiaoyan Yang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for the Prevention & Control of Animal Infectious Diseases & Biotechnology; Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Fujian Province University; College of Life Sciences, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, Fujian, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nakamura N. Why Genetic Effects of Radiation are Observed in Mice but not in Humans. Radiat Res 2017; 189:117-127. [PMID: 29261411 DOI: 10.1667/rr14947.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Genetic effects from radiation have been observed in a number of species to date. However, observations in humans are nearly nonexistent. In this review, possible reasons for the paucity of positive observations in humans are discussed. Briefly, it appears likely that radiation sensitivity for the induction of mutations varies among different genes, and that the specific genes that were used in the past with the specific locus test utilizing millions of mice may have simply been very responsive to radiation. In support of this notion, recent studies targeting the whole genome to detect copy number variations (deletions and duplications) in offspring derived from irradiated spermatogonia indicated that the mutation induction rate per genome is surprisingly lower than what would have been expected from previous results with specific locus tests, even in the mouse. This finding leads us to speculate that the lack of evidence for the induction of germline mutations in humans is not due to any kind of species differences between humans and mice, but rather to the lack of highly responsive genes in humans, which could be used for effective mutation screening purposes. Examples of such responsive genes are the mouse coat color genes, but in human studies many more genes with higher response rates are required because the number of offspring examined and the radiation doses received are smaller than in mouse studies. Unfortunately, such genes have not yet been found in humans. These results suggest that radiation probably induces germline mutations in humans but that the mutation induction rate is likely to be much lower than has been estimated from past specific locus studies in mice. Whole genome sequencing studies will likely shed light on this point in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nori Nakamura
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 732-0815 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tarín JJ, García-Pérez MA, Cano A. Obstetric and offspring risks of women's morbid conditions linked to prior anticancer treatments. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016; 14:37. [PMID: 27386839 PMCID: PMC4936115 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0169-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature shows the effects of type of cancer and/or anticancer treatment on live birth percentages and/or pregnancy and neonatal complications in female cancer survivors. However, studies analyzing the obstetric and offspring risks of the morbid conditions associated with previous anti-cancer treatments are missing. The present review aims to uncover these risks. METHODS A literature search based on publications up to March 2016 identified by PubMed and references cited in relevant articles. RESULTS The morbid conditions associated with prior anticancer treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and/or hematopoietic stem-cell transplant may induce not only obstetric and neonatal complications but also long-term effects on offspring. Whereas some risks are predominantly evidenced in untreated women others are observed in both treated and untreated women. These risks may be superimposed on those induced by the current women's trend in Western societies to postpone maternity. CONCLUSIONS Medical professionals should be aware and inform female cancer survivors wishing to have a child not only of the short- and long-term risks to themselves and their prospective offspring of previous anticancer treatments, fertility-preservation technologies, and pregnancy itself, but also of those risks linked to the morbid conditions induced by prior anticancer treatments. Once female cancer survivors wishing to have a child have been properly informed about the risks of reproduction, they will be best placed to make decisions of whether or not to have a biological or donor-conceived child. In addition, when medical professionals be aware of these risks, they will be also best placed to provide appropriate treatments before/during pregnancy in order to prevent or alleviate the impact of these morbid conditions on maternal and offspring health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan J. Tarín
- Department of Cellular Biology, Functional Biology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Valencia, 46100 Spain
| | - Miguel A. García-Pérez
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Valencia, 46100 Spain
- Research Unit-INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, 46010 Spain
| | - Antonio Cano
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, 46010 Spain
- Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, 46010 Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pires I, Cabral M, Figueiredo H, Osório M, Pinelo S, Serra H, Barbosa A, Ferraz L, Felgueira E. Preservação da fertilidade masculina no Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho EPE – 17 anos de experiência. Rev Int Androl 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.androl.2015.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
13
|
Seppänen VI, Artama MS, Malila NK, Pitkäniemi JM, Rantanen ME, Ritvanen AK, Madanat-Harjuoja LM. Risk for congenital anomalies in offspring of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Int J Cancer 2016; 139:1721-30. [PMID: 27280956 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Revised: 05/11/2016] [Accepted: 05/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Offspring of cancer survivors (CS) may be at risk for congenital anomalies due to the mutagenic therapies received by their parents. Our population-based cohort study aimed to investigate the risk for congenital anomalies in offspring of CS compared to offspring of their siblings. Using the Finnish Cancer Registry, Central Population Register, and Hospital Discharge Register, we identified hospital contacts due to congenital anomalies in 6,862 offspring of CS (early-onset cancer between 1953 and 2004) and 35,690 offspring of siblings. Associations between congenital anomalies and cancer were evaluated using generalized linear regression modelling. The ratio of congenital anomalies in offspring of CS (3.2%) was slightly, but non-significantly, elevated compared to that in offspring of siblings (2.7%) [prevalence ratio (PR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.25]. When offspring of childhood and adolescent survivors (0-19 years at cancer diagnosis) were compared to siblings' offspring, the risk for congenital anomalies was non-significantly increased (PR 1.17, 95% CI 0.92-1.49). No such increase existed for offspring of young adult survivors (20-34 years at cancer diagnosis) (PR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.23). The risks for congenital anomalies were elevated among offspring of CS diagnosed with cancer in the earlier decades (1955-1964: PR 2.77, 95% C I 1.26-6.11; and 1965-1974: PR 1.55, 95% C I 0.94-2.56). In our study, we did not detect an overall elevated risk for congenital anomalies in offspring of survivors diagnosed in young adulthood. An association between cancer exposure of the parent and congenital anomalies in the offspring appeared only for those CS who were diagnosed in the earlier decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viivi I Seppänen
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Nea K Malila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.,School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | | | | | - Annukka K Ritvanen
- Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations, THL National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Laura-Maria Madanat-Harjuoja
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Pediatrics, Jorvi Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Grant EJ, Furukawa K, Sakata R, Sugiyama H, Sadakane A, Takahashi I, Utada M, Shimizu Y, Ozasa K. Risk of death among children of atomic bomb survivors after 62 years of follow-up: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:1316-23. [PMID: 26384241 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00209-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Revised: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No clear epidemiological hereditary effects of radiation exposure in human beings have been reported. However, no previous studies have investigated mortality into middle age in a population whose parents were exposed to substantial amounts of radiation before conception. We assessed mortality in children of the atomic bomb survivors after 62 years of follow-up. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, we assessed 75 327 singleton children of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and unexposed controls, born between 1946 and 1984, and followed up to Dec 31, 2009. Parental gonadal doses of radiation from the atomic bombings were the primary exposures. The primary endpoint was death due to cancer or non-cancer disease, based on death certificates. FINDINGS Median follow-up was 54·3 years (IQR 45·4-59·3). 5183 participants died from disease. The mean age of the 68 689 surviving children at the end of follow-up was 53·1 years (SD 7·9) with 15 623 (23%) older than age 60 years. For parents who were exposed to a non-zero gonadal dose of radiation, the mean dose was 264 mGy (SD 463). We detected no association between maternal gonadal radiation exposure and risk of death caused by cancer (hazard ratio [HR] for 1 Gy change in exposure 0·891 [95% CI 0·693-1·145]; p=0·36) or risk of death caused by non-cancer diseases (0·973 [0·849-1·115]; p=0·69). Likewise, paternal exposure had no effect on deaths caused by cancer (0·815 [0·614-1·083]; p=0·14) or deaths caused by non-cancer disease (1·103 [0·979-1·241]; p=0·12). Age or time between parental exposure and delivery had no effect on risk of death. INTERPRETATION Late effects of ionising radiation exposure include increased mortality risks, and models of the transgenerational effects of radiation exposure predict more genetic disease in the children of people exposed to radiation. However, children of people exposed to the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki had no indications of deleterious health effects after 62 years. Epidemiological studies complemented by sensitive molecular techniques are needed to understand the overall effects of preconception exposure to ionising radiation on human beings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Grant
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Kyoji Furukawa
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ritsu Sakata
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiromi Sugiyama
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Atsuko Sadakane
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ikuno Takahashi
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mai Utada
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yukiko Shimizu
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kotaro Ozasa
- The Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Beal MA, Rowan-Carroll A, Campbell C, Williams A, Somers CM, Marchetti F, Yauk CL. Single-molecule PCR analysis of an unstable microsatellite for detecting mutations in sperm of mice exposed to chemical mutagens. Mutat Res 2015; 775:26-32. [PMID: 25863182 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2015.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2015] [Revised: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 03/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Single-molecule PCR (SM-PCR) analysis of long and repetitive DNA sequences, known as expanded simple tandem repeats (ESTRs), has been the most efficient method for studying germline mutation induction in endogenous sequences to date. However, the long length of these sequences makes mutation detection imprecise and laborious, and they have been characterized only in mice. Here, we explore the use of unstable microsatellite sequences that can be typed with high precision by capillary electrophoresis as alternative loci for detecting germline mutations. We screened 24 microsatellite loci across inbred mouse strains and identified Mm2.2.1 as the most polymorphic microsatellite locus. We then optimized SM-PCR of Mm2.2.1 to detect mutations in sperm. SM-PCR analysis of sperm from untreated B6C3F1 and Muta(™)Mouse samples revealed mutation frequencies that are consistent with rates derived from family pedigree analysis (∼ 5 × 10(-3)). To determine whether this locus can be used to detect chemically induced germline mutations, Muta(™)Mouse males were exposed by oral gavage to a single dose of 100mg/kg of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) or to 100mg/kg of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) for 28 days alongside vehicle treated controls. Sperm were collected 10 weeks post-ENU exposure to sample sperm exposed as spermatogonial stem cells and 6 weeks post-BaP exposure to sample sperm that were dividing spermatogonia when the exposure was terminated. Both treatments resulted in a significant (approximately 2-fold) increase in mutation frequency in sperm compared to the control animals. The work establishes the utility of this microsatellite for studying mutation induction in the germ cells of mice. Because microsatellites are found in virtually every species, this approach holds promise for other organisms, including humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Beal
- Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada; Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
| | - Andrea Rowan-Carroll
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
| | - Caleigh Campbell
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
| | - Andrew Williams
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
| | | | - Francesco Marchetti
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
| | - Carole L Yauk
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Little MP. Germline minisatellite mutations in the offspring of irradiated parents. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2015; 35:E1-E4. [PMID: 25485602 DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/1/e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
|
18
|
Tawn EJ, Curwen GB, Rees GS, Jonas P. Germline minisatellite mutations in workers occupationally exposed to radiation at the Sellafield nuclear facility. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2015; 35:21-36. [PMID: 25485533 DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/1/21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Germline minisatellite mutation rates were investigated in male workers occupationally exposed to radiation at the Sellafield nuclear facility. DNA samples from 160 families with 255 offspring were analysed for mutations at eight hypervariable minisatellite loci (B6.7, CEB1, CEB15, CEB25, CEB36, MS1, MS31, MS32) by Southern hybridisation. No significant difference was observed between the paternal mutation rate of 5.0% (37 mutations in 736 alleles) for control fathers with a mean preconceptional testicular dose of 9 mSv and that of 5.8% (66 in 1137 alleles) for exposed fathers with a mean preconceptional testicular dose of 194 mSv. Subgrouping the exposed fathers into two dose groups with means of 111 mSv and 274 mSv revealed paternal mutation rates of 6.0% (32 mutations in 536 alleles) and 5.7% (34 mutations in 601 alleles), respectively, neither of which was significantly different in comparisons with the rate for the control fathers. Maternal mutation rates of 1.6% (12 mutations in 742 alleles) for the partners of control fathers and 1.7% (19 mutations in 1133 alleles) for partners of exposed fathers were not significantly different. This study provides evidence that paternal preconceptional occupational radiation exposure does not increase the germline minisatellite mutation rate and therefore refutes suggestions that such exposure could result in a destabilisation of the germline that can be passed on to future generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Janet Tawn
- Centre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research (CIGMR), Centre for Epidemiology, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. Formerly of Westlakes Research Institute4Westlakes Research Institute closed in 2010., Westlakes Science and Technology Park, Moor Row, Cumbria, CA24 3LN, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brent RL. Protection of the gametes embryo/fetus from prenatal radiation exposure. HEALTH PHYSICS 2015; 108:242-274. [PMID: 25551507 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
There is no convincing evidence of germline mutation manifest as heritable disease in the offspring of humans attributable to ionizing radiation, yet radiation clearly induces mutations in microbes and somatic cells of rodents and humans. Doses to the embryo estimated to be in the range of 0.15-0.2 Gy during the pre-implantation and pre-somite stages may increase the risk of embryonic loss. However, an increased risk of congenital malformations or growth retardation has not been observed in the surviving embryos. These results are primarily derived from mammalian animal studies and are referred to as the "all-or-none phenomenon." The tissue reaction effects of ionizing radiation (previously referred to as deterministic effects) are congenital malformations, mental retardation, decreased intelligence quotient, microcephaly, neurobehavioral effects, convulsive disorders, growth retardation (height and weight), and embryonic and fetal death (miscarriage, stillbirth). All these effects are consistent with having a threshold dose below which there is no increased risk. The risk of cancer in offspring that have been exposed to diagnostic x-ray procedures while in utero has been debated for 55 y. High doses to the embryo or fetus (e.g., >0.5 Gy) increase the risk of cancer. Most pregnant women exposed to x-ray procedures and other forms of ionizing radiation today received doses to the embryo or fetus <0.1 Gy. The risk of cancer in offspring exposed in utero at exposures <0.1 Gy is controversial and has not been fully resolved. Diagnostic imaging procedures using ionizing radiation that are clinically indicated for the pregnant patient and her fetus should be performed because the clinical benefits outweigh the potential oncogenic risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Brent
- *Thomas Jefferson University, Alfred I. DuPont Hospital for Children Research Department, Room 308, ARB, 1600 Rockland Road, Wilmington, DE 19803
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Guo Y, Li CI, Sheng Q, Winther JF, Cai Q, Boice JD, Shyr Y. Very low-level heteroplasmy mtDNA variations are inherited in humans. J Genet Genomics 2013; 40:607-15. [PMID: 24377867 PMCID: PMC4149221 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2013] [Revised: 10/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/27/2013] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about the inheritance of very low heteroplasmy mitochondria DNA (mtDNA) variations. Even with the development of new next-generation sequencing methods, the practical lower limit of measured heteroplasmy is still about 1% due to the inherent noise level of the sequencing. In this study, we sequenced the mitochondrial genome of 44 individuals using Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology and obtained high-coverage mitochondria sequencing data. Our study population contains many mother-offspring pairs. This unique study design allows us to bypass the usual heteroplasmy limitation by analyzing the correlation of mutation levels at each position in the mtDNA sequence between maternally related pairs and non-related pairs. The study showed that very low heteroplasmy variants, down to almost 0.1%, are inherited maternally and that this inheritance begins to decrease at about 0.5%, corresponding to a bottleneck of about 200 mtDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Guo
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Center for Quantitative Sciences, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| | - Chung-I Li
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Chiayi University (NCYU), Chiayi 60004, Taiwan, China
| | - Quanhu Sheng
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Center for Quantitative Sciences, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Jeanette F Winther
- Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Qiuyin Cai
- Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - John D Boice
- National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Yu Shyr
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Center for Quantitative Sciences, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mettler FA, Constine LS, Nosske D, Shore RE. Ninth Annual Warren K. Sinclair Keynote Address: effects of childhood radiation exposure: an issue from computed tomography scans to Fukushima. HEALTH PHYSICS 2013; 105:424-429. [PMID: 24077040 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0b013e31829c3548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The acute and chronic effects of radiation on children have been and will continue to be of great social, public health, scientific, and clinical importance. The focus of interest on ionizing radiation and children has been clear for over half a century and ranges from the effects of fallout from nuclear weapons testing to exposures from accidents, natural radiation, and medical procedures. There is a loosely stated notion that "children are three to five times more sensitive to radiation than adults." Is this really true? In fact, children are at greater risk for some health effects, but not all. For a few sequelae, children may be more resistant than adults. Which are those effects? How and why do they occur? While there are clear instances of increased risk of some radiation-induced tumors in children compared to adults, there are other tumor types in which there appears to be little or no difference in risk by age at exposure and some in which published models that assume the same relative increase in risks for child compared to adult exposures apply to nearly all tumor types are not supported by the scientific data. The United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) has a task group producing a comprehensive report on the subject. The factors to be considered include relevant radiation sources; developmental anatomy and physiology; dosimetry; and stochastic, deterministic, and hereditary effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred A Mettler
- *Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Service, New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 1501 San Pedro Blvd. SE, Albuquerque, NM,87108; †Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, Department of RadiationOncology, Clinical Director, Philip Rubin Survivorship Division, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, P.O. Box 647, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; ‡Fachbereich Strahlenschutz und Gesundheit, Bundesamt fur Strahlenschutz, Ingolstadter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Neuherberg, Germany; §Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
In experimental organisms such as fruit flies and mice, increased frequencies in germ cell mutations have been detected following exposure to ionizing radiation. In contrast, there has been no clear evidence for radiation-induced germ cell mutations in humans that lead to birth defects, chromosome aberrations, Mendelian disorders, etc. This situation exists partly because no sensitive and practical genetic marker is available for human studies and also because the number of people exposed to large doses of radiation and subsequently having offspring was small until childhood cancer survivors became an important study population. In addition, the genome of apparently normal individuals seems to contain large numbers of alterations, including dozens to hundreds of nonfunctional alleles. With the number of mutational events in protein-coding genes estimated as less than one per genome after 1 gray (Gy) exposure, it is unsurprising that genetic effects from radiation have not yet been detected conclusively in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nori Nakamura
- Department of Genetics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan; , ,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Little MP, Goodhead DT, Bridges BA, Bouffler SD. Evidence relevant to untargeted and transgenerational effects in the offspring of irradiated parents. Mutat Res 2013; 753:50-67. [PMID: 23648355 PMCID: PMC3737396 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2012] [Revised: 04/20/2013] [Accepted: 04/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In this article we review health effects in offspring of human populations exposed as a result of radiotherapy and some groups exposed to chemotherapy. We also assess risks in offspring of other radiation-exposed groups, in particular those of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors and occupationally and environmentally exposed groups. Experimental findings are also briefly surveyed. Animal and cellular studies tend to suggest that the irradiation of males, at least at high doses (mostly 1Gy and above), can lead to observable effects (including both genetic and epigenetic) in the somatic cells of their offspring over several generations that are not attributable to the inheritance of a simple mutation through the parental germline. However, studies of disease in the offspring of irradiated humans have not identified any effects on health. The available evidence therefore suggests that human health has not been significantly affected by transgenerational effects of radiation. It is possible that transgenerational effects are restricted to relatively short times post-exposure and in humans conception at short times after exposure is likely to be rare. Further research that may help resolve the apparent discrepancies between cellular/animal studies and studies of human health are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9778, Bethesda, MD 20892-9778, USA.
| | | | - Bryn A Bridges
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
| | - Simon D Bouffler
- Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tatsukawa Y, Cologne JB, Hsu WL, Yamada M, Ohishi W, Hida A, Furukawa K, Takahashi N, Nakamura N, Suyama A, Ozasa K, Akahoshi M, Fujiwara S, Shore R. Radiation risk of individual multifactorial diseases in offspring of the atomic-bomb survivors: a clinical health study. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2013; 33:281-293. [PMID: 23482396 DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/2/281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
There is no convincing evidence regarding radiation-induced heritable risks of adult-onset multifactorial diseases in humans, although it is important from the standpoint of protection and management of populations exposed to radiation. The objective of the present study was to examine whether parental exposure to atomic-bomb (A-bomb) radiation led to an increased risk of common polygenic, multifactorial diseases-hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction or stroke-in the first-generation (F1) offspring of A-bomb survivors. A total of 11,951 F1 offspring of survivors in Hiroshima or Nagasaki, conceived after the bombing, underwent health examinations to assess disease prevalence. We found no evidence that paternal or maternal A-bomb radiation dose, or the sum of their doses, was associated with an increased risk of any multifactorial diseases in either male or female offspring. None of the 18 radiation dose-response slopes, adjusted for other risk factors for the diseases, was statistically significantly elevated. However, the study population is still in mid-life (mean age 48.6 years), and will express much of its multifactorial disease incidence in the future, so ongoing longitudinal follow-up will provide increasingly informative risk estimates regarding hereditary genetic effects for incidence of adult-onset multifactorial disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshimi Tatsukawa
- Department of Clinical Studies, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jargin SV. Some aspects of mutation research after a low-dose radiation exposure. Mutat Res 2012; 749:101-2; author reply 103-4. [PMID: 23000512 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
26
|
The use of next generation sequencing technology to study the effect of radiation therapy on mitochondrial DNA mutation. Mutat Res 2012; 744:154-60. [PMID: 22387842 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2011] [Revised: 02/15/2012] [Accepted: 02/16/2012] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The human mitochondrial genome has an exclusively maternal mode of inheritance. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is particularly vulnerable to environmental insults due in part to an underdeveloped DNA repair system, limited to base excision and homologous recombination repair. Radiation exposure to the ovaries may cause mtDNA mutations in oocytes, which may in turn be transmitted to offspring. We hypothesized that the children of female cancer survivors who received radiation therapy may have an increased rate of mtDNA heteroplasmy mutations, which conceivably could increase their risk of developing cancer and other diseases. We evaluated 44 DNA blood samples from 17 Danish and 1 Finnish families (18 mothers and 26 children). All mothers had been treated for cancer as children and radiation doses to their ovaries were determined based on medical records and computational models. DNA samples were sequenced for the entire mitochondrial genome using the Illumina GAII system. Mother's age at sample collection was positively correlated with mtDNA heteroplasmy mutations. There was evidence of heteroplasmy inheritance in that 9 of the 18 families had at least one child who inherited at least one heteroplasmy site from his or her mother. No significant difference in single nucleotide polymorphisms between mother and offspring, however, was observed. Radiation therapy dose to ovaries also was not significantly associated with the heteroplasmy mutation rate among mothers and children. No evidence was found that radiotherapy for pediatric cancer is associated with the mitochondrial genome mutation rate in female cancer survivors and their children.
Collapse
|
27
|
Winther JF, Olsen JH. Does Cancer Treatment in Childhood Induce Transgenerational Genetic Damage? J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:225-6. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.39.4296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette F. Winther
- Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørgen H. Olsen
- Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; Vanderbilt University and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Signorello LB, Mulvihill JJ, Green DM, Munro HM, Stovall M, Weathers RE, Mertens AC, Whitton JA, Robison LL, Boice JD. Congenital anomalies in the children of cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 30:239-45. [PMID: 22162566 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.37.2938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Children with cancer receive mutagenic treatments, which raises concern about the potential transmissibility of germline damage to their offspring. This question has been inadequately studied to date because of a lack of detailed individual treatment exposure assessment such as gonadal radiation doses. METHODS Within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of validated cases of congenital anomalies among 4,699 children of 1,128 male and 1,627 female childhood cancer survivors. We quantified chemotherapy with alkylating agents and radiotherapy doses to the testes and ovaries and related these exposures to risk of congenital anomalies using logistic regression. RESULTS One hundred twenty-nine children had at least one anomaly (prevalence = 2.7%). For children whose mothers were exposed to radiation or alkylating agents versus neither, the prevalence of anomalies was 3.0% versus 3.5% (P = .51); corresponding figures were 1.9% versus 1.7% (P = .79) for the children of male survivors. Neither ovarian radiation dose (mean, 1.19 Gy; odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.75 for 2.50+ Gy) nor testicular radiation dose (mean, 0.48 Gy; OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.83 for 0.50+ Gy) was related to risk of congenital anomalies. Treatment with alkylating agents also was not significantly associated with anomalies in the children of male or female survivors. CONCLUSION Our findings offer strong evidence that the children of cancer survivors are not at significantly increased risk for congenital anomalies stemming from their parent's exposure to mutagenic cancer treatments. This information is important for counseling cancer survivors planning to have children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa B Signorello
- International Epidemiology Institute, 1455 Research Blvd, Suite 550, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Winther JF, Olsen JH, Wu H, Shyr Y, Mulvihill JJ, Stovall M, Nielsen A, Schmiegelow M, Boice JD. Genetic disease in the children of Danish survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 30:27-33. [PMID: 22124106 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.35.0504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preconception radiation and chemotherapy have the potential to produce germ cell mutations leading to genetic disease in the next generation. Dose-response relationships were evaluated between cancer treatments and untoward pregnancy outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS A case-cohort study was conducted involving 472 Danish survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer and their 1,037 pregnancies. Adverse outcomes included 159 congenital malformations, six chromosomal abnormalities, seven stillbirths, and nine neonatal deaths. Preconception radiation doses to the gonads, uterus, and pituitary gland and administered chemotherapy were quantified based on medical records and related to adverse outcomes using a generalized estimating equation model. RESULTS No statistically significant associations were found between genetic disease in children and parental treatment with alkylating drugs or preconception radiation doses to the testes in male and ovaries in female cancer survivors. Specifically, the risk of genetic disease was similar among the children of irradiated survivors when compared with nonirradiated survivors (relative risk [RR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.44; P = .94). A statistically significant association between abdomino-pelvic irradiation and malformations, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths was not seen in the children of female survivors overall (P = .07) or in the children of mothers receiving high uterine doses (mean, 13.5 Gy; max, 100 Gy; RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.95 to 5.56). CONCLUSION Mutagenic chemotherapy and radiotherapy doses to the gonads were not associated with genetic defects in children of cancer survivors. However, larger studies need to be conducted to further explore potential associations between high-dose pelvic irradiation and specific adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette F Winther
- Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|