Social, health and drug use characteristics of primary crack users in three mid-sized communities in British Columbia, Canada

The Urgent Need to Respond to HIV- and HCV-Related Risk Practices among Youth in Ottawa Who Smoke Crack

A community-based research project, Project Rock sought to provide evidence to respond to the community-identified need to more fully understand the parameters of the social and risk profiles of youth in Ottawa who smoked crack. Objectives: In this article we examine engagement in HIV and HCV risk-related smoking practices, and experiences accessing safer inhalation supplies with the objective of identifying potential intervention points and associated harm reduction interventions to initiate and support safer inhalation practices. Methods: The study comprised four sequential components - formation and facilitation of a Youth Project team, qualitative interviews, and member checking workshops - each component building on the preceding and all contributing to the final and fourth component of the interviewer-administered quantitative survey from which data for this article are drawn. Eligibility criteria: capable of informed consent; aged between 16 and 25 years; had ever injected drugs or had ever tried crack or had used two or more hard drugs in the three months preceding their interview. Recruitment cards distributed by community agencies, honoraria and debriefing offered. Separate consent obtained for collection of finger prick blood samples for HIV and HCV laboratory testing. Results: 125 young people completed personal interviews in November 2013. This article is restricted to those 97 participants who had smoked crack. High rates of engagement in documented HIV- and HCV-related crack smoking practices were reported including nonuse of mouthpieces, use of non-recommended smoking devices and frequent engagement in equipment sharing; engagement compounded by the heightened confirmed prevalence of HCV. Conclusion: The youth in our study explained the utility of crack in their lives. Given the mental health drivers of engagement, ease of accessibility and availability, engagement in smoking crack is clearly likely to continue, firmly indicating the urgent necessity to ensure its safer use through gender neutral, youth-specific enhanced programming and resource distribution.

Education and equipment for people who smoke crack cocaine in Canada: progress and limits

BACKGROUND

People who smoke crack cocaine experience a wide variety of health-related issues. However, public health programming designed for this population is limited, particularly in comparison with programming for people who inject drugs. Canadian best practice recommendations encourage needle and syringe programs (NSPs) to provide education about safer crack cocaine smoking practices, distribute safer smoking equipment, and provide options for safer disposal of used equipment.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey of NSP managers across Canada to estimate the proportions of NSPs that provide education and distribute safer smoking equipment to people who smoke crack cocaine. We also assessed change in pipe distribution practices between 2008 and 2015 in the province of Ontario.

RESULTS

Analysis of data from 80 programs showed that the majority (0.76) provided education to clients on reducing risks associated with sharing crack cocaine smoking equipment and about when to replace smoking equipment (0.78). The majority (0.64) also distributed safer crack cocaine smoking equipment and over half of these programs (0.55) had done so for less than 5 years. Among programs that distributed pipes, 0.92 distributed the recommended heat-resistant Pyrex and/or borosilicate glass pipes. Only 0.50 of our full sample reported that their program provides clients with containers for safer disposal of used smoking equipment. The most common reasons for not distributing safer smoking equipment were not enough funding (0.32) and lack of client demand (0.25). Ontario-specific sub-analyses showed a significant increase in the proportion of programs distributing pipes in Ontario from 0.15 (2008) to 0.71 (2015).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings point to important efforts by Canadian NSPs to reduce harm among people who smoke crack cocaine through provision of education and equipment, but there are still limits that could be addressed. Our study can provide guidance for future cross-jurisdiction studies to describe relationships involving harm reduction programs and provision of safer crack cocaine smoking education and equipment.

Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre crack: análise do seu uso prejudicial nas dimensões individual e contextual

RESUMO Este artigo visa investigar como se conformam, no Brasil e internacionalmente, as abordagens ao uso prejudicial do crack e outras drogas. Foi realizada uma revisão crítica da literatura acerca do padrão de consumo do crack e os fatores a ele relacionados com busca sistemática em bases eletrônicas no período de 2010 a 2016. Foram analisados 37 artigos por autor, ano, país do estudo, metodologia; padrão de consumo de crack e fatores individuais e contextuais relativos a esse uso. Conclui-se que a abordagem ao uso de drogas deve estar focada na perspectiva da redução de danos, na promoção da autonomia e dos direitos humanos, e não na utopia de eliminação do consumo e da produção de drogas.

A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of an unsanctioned supervised smoking facility in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada

BACKGROUND

Smoking crack involves the risk of transmitting diseases such as HIV and hepatitis C (HCV). The current study determines whether the formerly unsanctioned supervised smoking facility (SSF)-operated by the grassroot organization, Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU) for the last few years-costs less than the costs incurred for health-care services as a direct consequence of not having such a program in Vancouver, Canada.

METHODS

The data pertaining to the attendance at the SSF was gathered in 2012-2013 by VANDU. By relying on this data, a mathematical model was employed to estimate the number of HCV infections prevented by the former facility in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES).

RESULTS

The DTES SSF's benefit-cost ratio was conservatively estimated at 12.1:1 due to its low operating cost. The study used 70% and 90% initial pipe-sharing rates for sensitivity analysis. At 80% sharing rate, the marginal HCV cases prevented were determined to be 55 cases. Moreover, at 80% sharing rate, the marginal cost-effectiveness ratio ranges from $1,705 to $97,203. The results from both the baseline and sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the establishment of the SSF by VANDU on average had annually saved CAD$1.8 million dollars in taxpayer's money.

CONCLUSIONS

Funding SSFs in Vancouver is an efficient and effective use of financial resources in the public health domain; therefore, Vancouver Coastal Health should actively participate in their establishment in order to reduce HCV and other blood-borne infections such as HIV within the non-injecting drug users.

Housing and harm reduction: what is the role of harm reduction in addressing homelessness?

Homelessness and drug use often overlap and the harms of substance use are exacerbated by homelessness. Responding to the twin problems of homelessness and substance use is an important aspect of strategies to end homelessness. The introduction and development of ten year plans to end homelessness in North America heralds a new era of systemic responses to homelessness. Central to many of these plans is the adoption of 'Housing First' as a policy response. Housing First focuses directly on housing people regardless of current patterns of substance use. As such, harm reduction is a key principle of Housing First. In this paper, we examine Housing First as an example of the integration of housing and harm reduction and then put forth a community level policy framework to further promote the integration of harm reduction as part of a response to homelessness. Drawing on Rhodes' risk environment framework and current evidence of Housing First and harm reduction, we describe four key policy areas for action: (1) social inclusion policies; (2) adequate and appropriate supply of housing; (3) on demand harm reduction services and supports and (4) systemic and organizational infrastructure. We conclude by identifying areas for future research.

Current interventions to reduce sexual risk behaviors and crack cocaine use among HIV-infected individuals

The dual global epidemics of crack cocaine use and HIV have resulted in a large number of people living with HIV who use crack cocaine, many of whom continue to engage in unprotected sex. Crack use also increases the rate of HIV progression. Consequently, there is an urgent need for effective interventions to decrease crack use and unprotected sex and to improve antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in this population. This article reviews the recent published literature on interventions for reducing crack use and unprotected sex among people living with HIV. Only a few intervention outcome studies targeting exclusively HIV positive crack cocaine users were identified, whereas other studies used a mixed sample. Some interventions focused on reducing crack use and several focused on reducing sex-risk behaviors. Consequently, there is a critical need for efficacious interventions that address crack use, risky sex and ART adherence among people living with HIV.

Temporal and geographic shifts in urban and nonurban cocaine-related fatal overdoses in British Columbia, Canada

PURPOSE

Illicit drug overdose is a leading cause of premature mortality. We sought to examine fatal overdose trends from 2001 to 2005 in urban and nonurban areas of British Columbia, Canada.

METHODS

We conducted a review of all provincial coroner files in which drug overdose was the cause of death between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005. We compared cocaine and non-cocaine-related overdoses and examined temporal changes in cocaine-related mortality rates in urban and nonurban areas. Multilevel mixed effects models were used to determine the independent risk factors for cocaine-related death. Spatial analyses were conducted to identify clusters of these cases.

RESULTS

During the study period, 904 illicit drug overdoses were recorded, including 369 (40.8%) in nonurban areas and 532 (58.9%) related to cocaine consumption. In a multilevel model, we observed a significant interaction (p = .010) between population density and year, indicating a considerable and differential increase in the likelihood of cocaine-related deaths in nonurban areas. Cocaine-related deaths were clustered in the southeast region of the province.

CONCLUSIONS

Cocaine-related overdoses in nonurban areas should be a public health concern. Evidence-based interventions to reduce the risks associated with cocaine consumption and reach drug users in nonurban settings are needed.

Do crack smoking practices change with the introduction of safer crack kits?

OBJECTIVES

Crack smoking has increased in Vancouver despite the harms associated with its use. Many people who smoke crack share their equipment, thereby increasing their risk for infectious disease. This project explored the effects of outreach distribution of "safer crack kits" on smoking practices.

METHODS

Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted, the first prior to kit distribution and the second a year later. Participants were individuals who smoked crack and lived in Vancouver's inner city. Crack smoking practices and use of items in the crack kit were documented.

RESULTS

The results of the second survey (i.e., following 12 months of kit distribution) showed an increase in availability and use of safer use items; mouthpieces and condoms provided in the kit were used by 79% and 59% of recipients, respectively. Unsafe practices were reported post distribution: although 42% used brass screens, the majority reported that they usually used Brillo; over 40% of respondents reported using syringe plungers to scrape crack resin; and participants reported sharing crack-use paraphernalia.

CONCLUSION

While kit distribution made safer use items more accessible, its impact on safer use practice was limited. Our findings highlight the need for targeted distribution of safer use items. Future research should explore the dynamics of unsafe crack smoking practices and ways to leverage safer use messaging.

Public crack cocaine smoking and willingness to use a supervised inhalation facility: implications for street disorder

Background

The health risks of crack cocaine smoking in public settings have not been well described. We sought to identify factors associated with public crack smoking, and assess the potential for a supervised inhalation facility to reduce engagement in this behavior, in a setting planning to evaluate a medically supervised crack cocaine smoking facility.

Methods

Data for this study were derived from a Canadian prospective cohort of injection drug users. Using multivariate logistic regression we identified factors associated with smoking crack cocaine in public areas. Among public crack smokers we then identified factors associated with willingness to use a supervised inhalation facility.

Results

Among our sample of 623 people who reported crack smoking, 61% reported recently using in public locations. In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with public crack smoking included: daily crack cocaine smoking; daily heroin injection; having encounters with police; and engaging in drug dealing. In sub analysis, 71% of public crack smokers reported willingness to use a supervised inhalation facility. Factors independently associated with willingness include: female gender, engaging in risky pipe sharing; and having encounters with police.

Conclusion

We found a high prevalence of public crack smoking locally, and this behavior was independently associated with encounters with police. However, a majority of public crack smokers reported being willing to use a supervised inhalation facility, and individuals who had recent encounters with police were more likely to report willingness. These findings suggest that supervised inhalation facilities offer potential to reduce street-disorder and reduce encounters with police.