Sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after non-ablative or reduced intensity conditioning in related and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

Reduced-Intensity Compared to Nonmyeloablative Conditioning in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning are preferred for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although prior studies have suggested that higher-intensity regimens in RIC-NMA conditioning are associated with inferior outcomes in patients with NHL, the optimal conditioning regimen remains unknown. We performed a retrospective single-center analysis to determine outcomes of adult patients with B cell and T cell NHL who underwent allo-HCT and received either RIC or NMA conditioning between March 2008 and December 2019. RIC regimens included fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-thiotepa-4 Gy-total body irradiation (Flu-Cy-TT-4Gy-TBI), fludarabine-melphalan (Flu-Mel), fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-4 Gy-total body irradiation (Flu-Cy-4Gy-TBI), and fludarabine-busulfan-4 (Flu-Bu-4). The NMA regimen comprised fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-2 Gy-total body irradiation (Flu-Cy-2Gy-TBI). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Of 279 transplants recipients (median age, 58 years), 110 received RIC (55% Flu-Mel, 38% Flu-Cy-TT-4Gy-TBI, 6% Flu-Bu-4, 1% Flu-Cy-4Gy-TBI) and 169 received NMA conditioning with Flu-Cy-2Gy-TBI. With a median of 64 months of follow-up post-allo-HCT, there was no significant difference in OS between the NMA and RIC groups (median, not reached [NR] versus 103 months; P = .1), and this was maintained on multivariable analysis. Similarly, after adjustment for all independently significant covariates (age, Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS], Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index [HCT-CI], and disease histology), the regression analysis showed no significant difference in PFS with RIC compared to NMA conditioning (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], .92 to 2.09; P = .24). On univariable analysis, there was no significant difference in NRM between the RIC and NMA arms (100-day estimate, 10.0% versus 1.8%; P = .5). After adjustment for age, ethnicity, KPS, HCT-CI, GVHD prophylaxis, and donor source, RIC conditioning was associated with a significantly higher incidence of NRM compared to NMA conditioning (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.04 to 6.52; P = .039). On multivariable analysis, compared with the NMA arm, the RIC arm had higher rates of grade II-IV (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.86; P = .002) and grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 5.62; 95% CI, 2.03 to 15.6; P < .001). The findings of this study suggest that NMA conditioning with Flu-Cy-TBI-2Gy may be considered over more intensive RIC regimens for patients with NHL undergoing allo-HCT.

EASIX score predicts inferior survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) is a prognostic tool that uses common clinical laboratory values and has been shown to predict non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) at the onset of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We hypothesized that EASIX calculated at different time points pre- and post- HCT may predict NRM and OS, and that EASIX calculated at onset of GVHD may predict response to steroids. We evaluated the EASIX score pre- and post-HCT in 152 patients with lymphoid malignancies undergoing unmodified reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) alloHCT with uniform GVHD prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, EASIX calculated pre-HCT was significantly associated with higher NRM (HR = 1.64, p = 0.009) and lower OS (HR = 1.33, p = 0.046). Furthermore, EASIX calculated at day 30 and at day 100 was associated with increased NRM (HR = 1.65, p < 0.001; and HR = 1.65, p < 0.001) and decreased OS (HR = 1.27, p = 0.018; and HR = 1.49, p < 0.001), independent of HCT-CI, disease and conditioning regimen. Our study shows that high EASIX scores at various time points pre- and post-HCT are significantly associated with poorer overall outcomes. EASIX provides an independent and easily accessible tool to predict outcomes that can be complementary to other measures of risk stratification for patients undergoing HCT.

Novel and Promising Strategies for Therapy of Post-Transplant Chronic GVHD

Despite the achievements that have increased viability after the transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (aHSCT), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the main cause of late complications and post-transplant deaths. At the moment, therapy alternatives demonstrate limited effectiveness in steroid-refractory illness; in addition, we have no reliable data on the mechanism of this condition. The lack of drugs of choice for the treatment of GVHD underscores the significance of the design of new therapies. Improved understanding of the mechanism of chronic GVHD has secured new therapy goals, and organized diagnostic recommendations and the development of medical tests have ensured a general language and routes for studies in this field. These factors, combined with the rapid development of pharmacology, have helped speed up the search of medicines and medical studies regarding chronic GVHD. At present, we can hope for success in curing this formidable complication. This review summarizes the latest clinical developments in new treatments for chronic GVHD.

Impact of Letermovir Primary Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis on 1-Year Mortality After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive (R+) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a survival disparity compared with CMV-seronegative recipient/donor (R-D-) pairs. We hypothesized that primary letermovir prophylaxis (LET) may abrogate this disparity. We investigated the relationship between LET and mortality at 1 year post-HCT.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included adult R-D- or R+ patients who received HCT pre-LET (between 1 January 2013 through 15 December 2017) and post-LET (between 16 December 2017 through December 2019). R+ were categorized by LET receipt as R+/LET or R+/no-LET. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of LET with all-cause mortality at 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

Of 848 patients analyzed, 305 were R-D-, 364 R+/no-LET, and 160 R+/LET. Because of similar mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.29 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .76-2.18]; P = .353]) between pre-LET/R-D- and post-LET/R-D-, R-D- were combined into 1 group. Compared with R-D-, the aHR for mortality was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.01-1.93) for R+/no-LET and 0.89 (95% CI, .57-1.41) for R+/LET. Among R+, LET was associated with decreased risk of death (aHR, 0.62 [95% CI, .40-.98]); when conventional HCT and T-cell depleted HCT were analyzed separately, the aHR was 0.86 (95% CI, .51-1.43) and 0.21 (95% CI, .07-.65), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1 year post-HCT, LET was associated with closing the mortality disparity between R-D- and R+. Among all R+, LET was associated with decreased mortality, driven by 79% reduced incidence of death in T-cell depleted HCT.

Efficacy and safety of isavuconazole compared with voriconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Voriconazole is frequently discontinued prematurely as primary antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients due to adverse events. Limited data exists for isavuconazole as AFP. We analyzed adult HCT recipients who received voriconazole or isavuconazole AFP to estimate rate of premature AFP discontinuation, identify risk factors for premature AFP discontinuation, and compare incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) and survival at day + 180 post-HCT between patients who received voriconazole/isavuconazole-AFP. This was a propensity score matched cohort analysis of 210 HCT-recipients who received voriconazole-AFP (9/1/2014-12/31/2016; voriconazole-cohort), and 95 HCT-recipients who received isavuconazole-AFP (5/1/2017-10/31/2018; isavuconazole-cohort). AFP discontinuation for any reason prior to completion was defined as "premature". Median (interquartile range, IQR) duration of AFP was longer in the isavuconazole-cohort (94 days, 87-100) vs. the voriconazole-cohort (76 days, 23-94; P-value < 0.0001). Premature AFP discontinuation was more frequent in the voriconazole-cohort (92/210, 43.8%) vs. the isavuconazole-cohort (14/95, 14.7%; P-value < 0.0001). The most common reason for premature discontinuation was biochemical hepatotoxicity (voriconazole-cohort: 48/210, 22.8% vs. isavuconazole-cohort: 5/95, 5.26%; P-value = 0.0002). Transaminase values between baseline and end-of-treatment (EOT) and up to 14 days post-EOT significantly increased in the voriconazole-cohort, but remained unchanged in the isavuconazole-cohort. The incidence of IFI at day + 180 was 2.9% (6/210) and 3.2% (3/95) in the voriconazole-cohort and isavuconazole-cohort, respectively (P-value = 0.881). All-cause mortality at day + 180 was 2.4% (5/210) and 6.3% (6/95) in the voriconazole-cohort and isavuconazole-cohort, respectively (P-value = 0.089). When compared to voriconazole, isavuconazole was a safer and as effective primary AFP during the first 3 months after HCT.

LAY SUMMARY

When compared to voriconazole, isavuconazole is a safer and as effective primary antifungal prophylaxis during the first 3 months after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, with lower rates of hepatotoxicity, and similar rates of fungal infections and all-cause mortality.

Fractionated Infusion of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Does Not Improve Neutrophil Recovery or Survival in Allograft Recipients

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a potentially curative therapy in patients with hematologic malignancies; however, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) remains a concern. Strategies to improve neutrophil recovery and immune reconstitution are needed to decrease NRM. Murine models of allogeneic HCT suggest that fractionated hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) infusion may improve engraftment through improved access of HPCs to a viable hematopoietic niche. The primary objective of the present study was to determine the impact of fractionated infusion versus unfractionated (bulk) infusion of HPCs on the time to achieve neutrophil engraftment. Secondary objectives included the effect of fractionated versus bulk infusion of HPCs on platelet engraftment, immune reconstitution, the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV, NRM, and overall survival (OS). In this randomized phase 2 study, patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic HCT were randomized to receive HPC infusion as a bulk (bulk arm) or in fractions (fractionated arm): 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight infused on day 0, with the remaining HPCs CD34+ cell-selected then infused in equally distributed aliquots on days 2, 4, and 6 post-HCT. Randomization was stratified by type of transplant, unmodified (i.e. T cell-replete graft) versus CD34+ cell-selected (T cell-depleted graft). Patients whose donor failed to collect at least 7 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg of recipient weight received bulk HPC infusions regardless of randomization, for safety. These patients continued the HCT process on study but were replaced until each arm reached the prespecified accrual target. Per protocol, these patients were not included in this modified intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 116 patients were enrolled. Donors of 42 patients failed to mobilize the minimum CD34+ cell dose (7 × 106 cells/kg recipient weight) and were excluded from the analysis. The 74 evaluable patients included 38 randomized to the bulk arm and 36 randomized to the fractionated arm. All patients engrafted. The median time to an absolute neutrophil count of ≥0.5 × 109/L was 11 days on both arms. The day +180 median CD4+ cell count was 179 cells/µL in the bulk arm and 111 cells/µL in the fractionated arm (P = .779). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on post-transplant day +100 was 32% in the bulk arm and 17% in the fractionated arm (P = .131). Two patients in the bulk arm, but none in the fractionated arm, experienced grade III-IV GVHD. The 4-year OS was 60% in the bulk arm and 62% in the fractionated arm (P = .414), whereas the 4-year cumulative incidences of NRM and relapse were similar in the 2 arms. Fractionated infusion of HPCs in allogeneic HCT recipients did not impact neutrophil or CD4+ cell recovery, NRM, relapse, or OS when compared with bulk HPC infusion. We also observed that with current mobilization techniques, it was unlikely that more than 60% of healthy donors would be able to collect >7 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight for adult recipients. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib for Switch-Maintenance Prophylaxis of Recurrent or Late Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease after Day 100 in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a frequent complication in the first year after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Recipients of reduced-intensity (RI) or nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning combined with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based GVHD prophylaxis frequently develop GVHD in the context of immunosuppression taper. Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor with a wide safety profile that has demonstrated immunomodulatory properties, inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and anti-tumor activity. We hypothesized that switch-maintenance GVHD prophylaxis using ixazomib would facilitate CNI taper without increased GVHD frequency and severity while maintaining graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect and an acceptable safety profile. We conducted an open-label, prospective, single-center pilot study in patients with hematologic malignancies who received an RI or NMA conditioning and CNI-based GVHD prophylaxis that were within day 100 to 150 after HCT (n = 18). Patients were treated with ixazomib once weekly on a 28-day cycle (3 weeks on, 1 week off). Treatment was safe; most adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with cytopenia and elevation in transaminases the most common. Five patients were removed from the study because of toxicity or side effects. Only 5 of 18 patients developed GVHD during the study, and its severity was driven by acute manifestations while chronic involvement was mild. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute and chronic GVHD at 1-year after HCT was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13-55). No patients died during the study, and only 1 had malignant relapse. An additional patient relapsed after completion of the study but within 1 year after HCT. The probability of progression-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (composite endpoint) at 1 year were 89% (95% CI, 75-100) and 78% (95% CI, 61-100), respectively. Immune reconstitution analysis showed a rapid and sustained recovery in T-cell subpopulations and B cell reconstitution, and vaccine response in a subset of patients demonstrated continuing or de novo positive protective antibody titers. This study demonstrated low incidence of recurrent and late acute and chronic GVHD within 1 year after HCT possible associated with switch-maintenance GVHD prophylaxis using ixazomib. This approach allowed for CNI taper while preserving GVT effect, without aggravating GVHD. Our findings support further development of this approach and provide a proof-of-concept for switch-maintenance GVHD prophylaxis.

Impact of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Hospitalizations and Cost after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia occurs in 40% to 80% of CMV-seropositive (R+) recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The preemptive therapy (PET) strategy has reduced the risk of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) and associated mortality but may lead to substantial healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. Real-world data on the economic impact of PET is relevant for the evaluation of alternative strategies for CMV management. We examined the impact of clinically significant CMV treated with PET on inpatient length of stay (LOS), number of readmissions, and associated costs from day 0 through day 180 post-HCT. This was a retrospective study of R+ adults who underwent peripheral blood or marrow allogeneic HCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between March 2013 and December 2017. Patients were routinely screened for CMV by qPCR and received PET according to institutional standards of care. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and hospital databases. Itemized cost data per patient were obtained from the Vizient database, adjusted to 2017 dollars using inflation indices. Study outcomes included HCRU evaluated by inpatient LOS and inpatient cost in patients who received PET for clinically significant CMV (PET group) compared with those who did not receive PET (no PET group) and the frequency and cost of CMV-related readmissions compared with non CMV-related readmissions. We used generalized linear models to examine the incremental HCRU and costs associated with PET controlling for other potential factors. Of 357 patients, PET was initiated in 208 (58.3%), at a median of 35 days after HCT. By day 180, 23 patients (6.4%) had developed CMV EOD and 3 (.8%) had died of CMV. Compared with the no PET group, the PET group had a longer LOS for HCT admission (P = .0276), longer total LOS by day 180 (P = .0001), a higher number of readmissions (P = .0001), a higher mean inpatient cost for HCT admission ($189,389 versus $151,646; P = .0133), and a higher total inpatient cost ($297,563 versus $205,815; P < .0001). Among PET recipients, CMV-related readmissions were associated with higher mean cost per episode compared with non CMV-related readmissions ($165,455 versus $89,419; P = .005). CMV-related readmissions comprised 40.6% of total all-cause readmissions and incurred 55.9% of total all-cause readmission costs in PET recipients. Our data show that patients treated with currently available PET had greater inpatient HCRU and cost, by day 180 compared with patients who did not receive PET. The cost of CMV-related readmissions accounted for 56% of total readmission cost among PET recipients. Future studies are needed to examine the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for CMV management.

Impact of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Toxicities after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

(Val)ganciclovir (vGCV) or foscarnet (FCN) as preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity, respectively. We analyzed a cohort of CMV-seropositive (R⁺) HCT recipients managed preemptively at a single center. The objectives of our study were to (1) quantify the frequencies of neutropenia and acute kidney injury (AKI) through day +100 (D100) post-HCT and at PET discontinuation and (2) assess the impact of PET on neutropenia and AKI in multivariate models. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult CMV R⁺ recipients who underwent allo-HCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from March 18, 2013, through December 31, 2017, and were managed with PET. Patients were grouped by receipt of PET (PET and no PET). Neutropenia and AKI were defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Frequencies of toxicities by D100 were compared between relevant groups. The impact of PET on toxicities was examined in univariate and multivariate Poisson/negative binomial regression models. Of 368 CMV R⁺ HCT recipients, 208 (56.5%) received PET. Neutropenia by D100 occurred in 41.8% and 28.6% patients in PET and no PET, respectively (P = .0009). PET increased the risk of neutropenia (adjusted relative risk = 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.21; P < .0001) in multivariate analyses. AKI by D100 occurred in 12.0% and 7.8% patients in PET and no PET, respectively (P = .19). PET increased the risk of AKI by 2.75-fold (95% CI, 1.71 to 4.42; P < .0001). When PET recipients were grouped by first antiviral, neutropenia by D100 occurred in 34.8% and 48.9% of vGCV and FCN recipients, respectively, (P = .08), and AKI occurred in 13.0% and 34.0% of vGCV and FCN recipients, respectively (P = .001). At discontinuation of vGCV or FCN, neutropenia was present in 11.2% versus 2.1% patients, respectively (P = .08), and AKI was present in 1.9% of versus 12.8% patients respectively (P = .005). Preemptive therapy for CMV increased the risk of neutropenia and AKI in the first 100 days post-HCT by 1.8-fold and 2.8-fold, respectively. Our results underscore the need for safer antivirals for CMV management in HCT recipients.

Establishing a standardized system for review and adjudication of chronic graft-vs-host disease data in accordance with the National Institutes Consensus criteria

GVHD is a frequent complication following allo-HCT. The NIH consensus group established new guidelines for the evaluation of chronic GVHD. However, GVHD assessment remains challenging due its complexity and requirement for laborious evaluation. We, therefore, established a standardized approach for the assessment of chronic GVHD in accordance with the NCC guidelines. At a single institution, all allograft recipients were evaluated for GVHD within the first-year post allo-HCT following a 3-step workflow (real-time assessment, consensus review, and documentation). A GVHD adjudication committee was created and a dynamic electronic GVHD data capture form was developed guiding the clinician through a comprehensive review of systems following the NCC guidelines. We found that the assessment and reporting of GVHD reached 100% compliance. The establishment of an institutional GVHD adjudication committee enabled standardized assessment of GVHD. Our workflow can be adopted by other centers to create a similar framework for dedicated GVHD evaluation.

Alternative Donor Graft Sources for Adults with Hematologic Malignancies: A Donor for All Patients in 2017!

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is potentially curative for a wide variety of malignant diseases, including acute and leukemias, lymphoma, and myelodysplasia. Choice of a stem cell donor is dependent on donor availability, donor compatibility and health, recipient disease type, and recipient condition. Current sources of stem cell donation for HSCT are matched sibling donors (MSDs), matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 1-antigen mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs), haploidentical donors (haplo), and umbilical cord blood (UCB) units. Historically, preferred donors for HSCT have been human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors; however, only about 30% of U.S. patients will have a MSD available. The majority of patients referred for HSCT will require an alternative donor graft: MUD, MMUD, UCB, or haplo. The likelihood of finding a MUD varies depending on the ethnicity of the recipient. White Caucasians of European descent have the greatest chance of finding a MUD. Chances of finding a MUD are significantly less for African-American or Hispanic recipients due to HLA polymorphisms. Therefore, MMUD, UCB, and haplo donor graft sources expand the donor pool for recipients who do not have a MSD or MUD available. Given the variety of different donor stem cell sources available today, nearly every patient who needs an allogeneic HSCT has a potential donor in 2017. All transplant-eligible patients with hematologic malignancies should be evaluated by a transplant center to determine if HSCT is a viable treatment option for their underlying disease process.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The goal of this review is to increase the awareness of oncology practitioners to the availability of alternative donor stem cell transplants for patients with hematologic malignancies. Despite new agents, stem cell transplant remains the only curative therapy for many patients with acute and chronic leukemia, myelodysplasia, and lymphoma. Given the variety of different donor stem cell sources available today, nearly every patient who needs an allogeneic stem cell transplant will have a donor.

New perspectives on the use of mTOR inhibitors in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and graft-versus-host disease

Inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) has been exploited largely both in solid tumour oncology and solid organ transplantation. More recently mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus and everolimus have been introduced to the field of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation where their unique combination of immunosuppressive purposes offering reduced nephrotoxicity and potential antimalignant effects reflect a unique drug profile that has led to their widespread use in both prophylaxis and therapy of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). On the other hand haematological insufficiency, infectious complications as well as vasculopathies, have been frequently reported as limiting toxicities. Here, we review both the retrospective and prospective experience available to date and stress the need for prospective registration trials to reduce off label use and improve patient safety by optimizing dosing and enhancing pharmacovigilance. Furthermore, we speculate on the future role of mTOR inhibitors in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The addition of sirolimus to the graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimen in reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma: a multicentre randomized trial

Inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway has clinical activity in lymphoma. The mTOR inhibitor sirolimus has been used in the prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A retrospective study suggested that patients with lymphoma undergoing reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT who received sirolimus as part of their GVHD prophylaxis regimen had a lower rate of relapse. We therefore performed a multicentre randomized trial comparing tacrolimus, sirolimus and methotrexate to standard regimens in adult patients undergoing RIC HSCT for lymphoma in order to assess the possible benefit of sirolimus on HSCT outcome. 139 patients were randomized. There was no difference overall in 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, relapse, non-relapse mortality or chronic GVHD. However, the sirolimus-containing arm had a significantly lower incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (9% vs. 25%, P = 0·015), which was more marked for unrelated donor grafts. In conclusion, the addition of sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis in RIC HSCT is associated with no increased overall toxicity and a lower risk of acute GVHD, although it does not improve survival; this regimen is an acceptable option for GVHD prevention in RIC HSCT. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00928018).

Non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adults with relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a single-center analysis in the rituximab era

Relapsed and refractory (rel/ref) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) portends a dismal prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents the only potentially curative therapy in this setting. We analyzed survival outcomes of 29 recipients of non-myeloablative allo-HSCT for rel/ref MCL, and studied possible prognostic factors in this setting. The cumulative incidence of disease progression and non-relapse mortality at 3 years were 28% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13-46%) and 29% (95%CI: 13-47%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at days +100 and +180 were 34% (95%CI: 18-52%) and 45% (95%CI: 26-62%), respectively. With a median follow-up in survivors of 53 (range 24-83) months, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 54% (95%CI: 38-76%) and 41% (95%CI: 26-64%), respectively. In vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab (n=6) was associated with inferior 3-year PFS (0% vs. 51%, p=0.007) and OS (17% vs. 64%, p=0.014). Conversely, a second line international prognostic index (sIPI) at transplantation equal to 0 (no risk factors) was associated with an improved 3-year PFS (52% vs. 22%, p=0.020) and OS (71% vs. 22%, p=0.006) compared to sIPI ≥1. Performing an allo-HSCT before 2007 was associated with a decreased 3-year OS (25% vs. 76%, p=0.015) but not with a significantly inferior PFS (17% vs. 59%, p=0.058). In this single center series, we report encouraging results with allo-HSCT for patients with rel/ref MCL. High alemtuzumab doses should probably be avoided in this context.

Safety of voriconazole and sirolimus coadministration after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

Antifungal prophylaxis with azoles is considered standard in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). Although sirolimus is being used increasingly for the prevention of GVHD, it is a substrate of CYP3A4, which is inhibited by voriconazole, and concurrent administration can lead to significantly increased exposure to sirolimus. We identified 67 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HSCT with sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose MTX and received concomitant voriconazole prophylaxis from April 2008 to June 2011. All patients underwent a non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioned allo-HSCT. Patients received sirolimus and voriconazole concurrently for a median of 113 days. The median daily dose reduction of sirolimus at the start of coadministration was 90%. The median serum sirolimus trough levels before and at steady state of coadministration were 5.8 ng/mL (range: 0-47.6) and 6.1 ng/mL (range: 1-14.2) (P=0.45), respectively. One patient with an average sirolimus level of 6 ng/mL developed sirolimus-related thrombotic microangiopathy that resolved after sirolimus discontinuation. No sinusoidal obstructive syndrome was reported. Seventeen patients (25%) prematurely discontinued voriconazole because of the adverse events. Only two patients (3%) presented with possible invasive fungal infections at day 100. We demonstrate that sirolimus and voriconazole coadministration with an empiric 90% sirolimus dose reduction and close monitoring of sirolimus trough levels is safe and well tolerated.