A population-based analysis of second malignancies among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms in the SEER database

Second malignancies among older patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with hydroxyurea

Patients with classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF), are known to have an increased risk of second malignancies (SMs). Hydroxyurea (HU) is a guideline-recommended cytoreductive therapy for patients at high risk for MPNs. Controversy exists as to whether HU use is associated with a higher risk of SMs, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of older patients diagnosed with MPN (age ≥66 years) between 2010 and 2017 and included the data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database. Multivariable competing risk analyses adjusting for patient characteristics were used to assess the impact of HU on the development of SM. We identified 4023 patients (1688 with PV, 1976 with ET, and 359 with MF) with a median age of 77 (interquartile range [IQR], 71-83) years at the time of MPN diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 3.25 (IQR, 2.10-5.00) years, 489 patients developed an SM (346 solid, 73 lymphoid, and 70 myeloid malignancies). The cumulative incidence probability of SM was 19.88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.16%-22.75%) among 2683 HU users and 22.31% (95% CI, 17.51%-27.47%) among 1340 nonusers, respectively (Gray's test, P < .01). We did not identify significant differences in the incidence of solid or hematologic SMs, including AML/MDS (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.77-2.29; P = .30), between HU users and nonusers. Our results suggest that the use of HU does not increase the risk of SM in older patients with MPN.

Ruxolitinib-treated polycythemia vera patients and their risk of secondary malignancies

Recently, there has been increased concern about a risk of secondary malignancies (SM) occurring in myelofibrosis (MF) patients receiving ruxolitinib (RUX). In polycythemia vera (PV), on the other hand, only limited data on the risk of SM under RUX treatment are available. To investigate the association between RUX therapy in PV and SM, we conducted a retrospective, single-center study that included 289 PV patients. RUX was administered to 32.9% (95/289) of patients for a median treatment duration of 48.0 months (range 1.0–101.6). Within a median follow-up of 97 months (1.0–395.0) after PV diagnosis, 24 SM occurred. Comparing the number of PV patients with RUX-associated SM (n = 10, 41.7%) with the 14 (58.3%) patients who developed SM without RUX, no significant difference (p = 0.34, chi square test) was found. No increased incidences of melanoma, lymphoma, or solid “non-skin” malignancies were observed with RUX (p = 0.31, p = 0.60, and p = 0.63, respectively, chi square test). However, significantly more NMSC occurred in association with RUX treatment (p = 0.03, chi-squared test). The “SM-free survival” was not significantly different by log rank test for all 289 patients (p = 0.65), for the patients (n = 208; 72%) receiving cytoreductive therapy (p = 0.48) or for different therapy sequences (p = 0.074). In multivariate analysis, advanced age at PV diagnosis (HR 1.062 [95% CI 1.028, 1.098]) but not administration of RUX (HR 1.068 [95% CI 0.468, 2.463]) was associated with an increased risk for SM (p = 0.005). According to this retrospective analysis, no increased risk of SM due to RUX treatment could be substantiated for PV.

The 2020 revision of the guidelines for the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms

In 2016, the World Health Organization revised the diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) based on the discovery of disease-driving genetic aberrations and extensive analysis of the clinical characteristics of patients with MPNs. Recent studies have suggested that additional somatic mutations have a clinical impact on the prognosis of patients harboring these genetic abnormalities. Treatment strategies have also advanced with the introduction of JAK inhibitors, one of which has been approved for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and those with hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera. Recently developed drugs aim to elicit hematologic responses, as well as symptomatic and molecular responses, and the response criteria were refined accordingly. Based on these changes, we have revised the guidelines and present the diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification of MPNs encountered in Korea.

Risks of Solid and Lymphoid Malignancies in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Clinical Implications

Simple Summary

Patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia have an elevated risk of acute leukemia. Recently, it has been recognized that the risk of solid cancers is also increased. In the past decade, several studies have compared cancer frequency in patients with MPNs with the general population. In our study, we present results sampled from 12 previous studies, totaling more than 65,000 patients with MPNs identified through large registries. Patients with MPNs were compared to the age/sex-matched general population. Our results show that risk of new cancers is 1.5–3.0-fold elevated in patients with MPNs. In particular, lymphomas and cancers of the skin, lung, kidney, and thyroid gland occur more frequently. The difference in cancer occurrence is highest in the age group 60–79 years. Our results indicate that clinical follow up of patients with MPNs should include awareness of the increased cancer risk.

Abstract

In the past decade, several studies have reported that patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have an increased risk of second solid cancer or lymphoid hematological cancer. In this qualitative review study, we present results from studies that report on these cancer risks in comparison to cancer incidences in the general population or a control group. Our literature search identified 12 such studies published in the period 2009–2018 including analysis of more than 65,000 patients. The results showed that risk of solid cancer is 1.5- to 3.0-fold elevated and the risk of lymphoid hematological cancer is 2.5- to 3.5-fold elevated in patients with MPNs compared to the general population. These elevated risks apply to all MPN subtypes. For solid cancers, particularly risks of skin cancer, lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and kidney cancer are elevated. The largest difference in cancer risk between patients with MPN and the general population is seen in patients below 80 years. Cancer prognosis is negatively affected due to cardiovascular events, thrombosis, and infections by a concurrent MPN diagnosis mainly among patients with localized cancer. Our review emphasizes that clinicians caring for patients with MPNs should be aware of the very well-documented increased risk of second non-myeloid cancers.

Risk of disease transformation and second primary solid tumors in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

This study aimed to elucidate patterns of disease transformation to secondary myelofibrosis (SMF) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (SAML) and the development of second primary malignancies in South Korean patients with BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). By using nationwide public health care insurance claims data, we identified and analyzed 7454 patients with MPNs who were newly diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), or primary myelofibrosis (PMF) from 2008 to 2016 and used the data to appropriately trace the disease course. Transformation to SMF or SAML was rare in patients with ET and PV, but patients with PMF had an 8-year cumulative incidence of SAML of 21.4%. Patients with PV or ET had an 8-year cumulative incidence of second primary solid tumors of ∼14%. Patients with MPNs had a 2 times higher risk of developing second primary solid tumors than that of the general South Korean population. Compared with patients with PMF, patients with SMF had a similar overall survival with a lower risk of developing SAML. The use of ruxolitinib did not increase the risk of developing B-cell lymphoma over a median follow-up period of 16.2 months. Disease transformation to SMF or SAML was rare in patients with ET or PV, but SAML was common in patients with PMF. South Korean patients with MPNs had a significantly higher risk of developing second primary solid tumors than that of the general population, particularly for kidney, prostate, brain, liver, and lung cancers.

Second primary malignancies in ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis: real-world evidence from 219 consecutive patients

We present real-world data on all ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients in a 10-million-resident region, with a follow-up of 2 years. We found no evidence of an increased risk of developing lymphomas.

Second primary malignancies in postpolycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: A study on 2233 patients

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are known to have higher incidence of nonhematological second primary malignancies (SPM) compared to general population. In the MYSEC study on 781 secondary myelofibrosis (SMF) patients, the incidence of SPM after SMF diagnosis resulted 0.98/100 patient‐years. When including non‐melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), the incidence arose to 1.56/100 patient‐years. In SMF, JAK inhibitor treatment was associated only with NMSC occurrence. Then, we merged the MYSEC cohort with a large dataset of PV and ET not evolving into SMF. In this subanalysis, we did not find any correlation between SPM and SMF occurrence. These findings highlight the need of studies aimed at identifying MPN patients at higher risk of SPM.

Characteristics of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms with lymphoma, with or without JAK inhibitor therapy

There is a Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.

Philadelphia chromosome positive AML arising from JAK2-positive myelofibrosis

Background

A feature of myeloproliferative neoplasia is transforming to more aggressive and malignant myeloid neoplasia, including acute myeloid leukemia. Different pathogenesis mechanisms participate in transformation, including transformation of existing potential preleukemic clones, since JAK2-mutant myeloproliferative neoplasms often transform to JAK2 wild-type acute myeloid leukemia.

Case presentation

Here, we present an 80 year old man with a JAK2-V617F mutant primary myelofibrosis. After 10 months the disease transform into a Philadelphia chromosome positive acute myeloid leukemia, detecting the cytogenetic aberration; t(9;22)(q34;q22) encoding the rare BCR-ABL1 fusion gene; e6a2. The patient had treatment response to tyrosine kinases, illustrating the potential benefits of such approach in treating these patients subset.

Conclusion

The case illustrates the potential of leukemic transformation to Philadelphia chromosome positive myeloid malignancies from potential existing preleukemic clones, and the awareness of such an evolution among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Tyrosine kinases have potential effect also in patients presenting without chronic myeloid leukemia and with rare BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts, and should probably be a part of the treatment approach.

Elevated risk of subsequent malignancies in patients with appendiceal cancer: A population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal cancer is extremely rare with excellent survival after curative resection. There is a concern for the development of additional cancers in survivors of appendiceal cancer. However, existing data is limited to small anecdotal reports on appendiceal carcinoid only. We aim to investigate the risk of subsequent malignancies in patients with appendiceal carcinoma and correlate the risk according to patient and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We identified 3788 patients with appendiceal cancer from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1992 and 2011. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for the risk of additional cancers were calculated and quantified based on tumor site, gender, race, latency, primary tumor stage, and histology.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-nine subsequent malignancies were identified in 313 patients (mean age 60 years, male to female ratio 1.3:1). The overall risk for a subsequent malignancy was elevated by 20 % compared with the general population. Most common sites with significantly increased risk for subsequent cancers included the small intestine (n=13) and the colon/rectum (n=48). Malignant carcinoid and adenocarcinoma were the dominant histological subtypes at these sites, respectively. Significant elevated risk was observed within the first 5 years of follow up in white males with either localized or regional disease. Adenocarcinomas and goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix were associated with increased risk; whereas, the risk was significantly reduced in patients with malignant carcinoid tumors.

CONCLUSION

There is an increased risk of subsequent cancers in patients with appendiceal carcinoma.