Phosphorylation and recycling kinetics of G protein-coupled receptors

Sex-Specific Vasopressin Signaling Buffers Stress-Dependent Synaptic Changes in Female Mice

In many species, social networks provide benefit for both the individual and the collective. In addition to transmitting information to others, social networks provide an emotional buffer for distressed individuals. Our understanding about the cellular mechanisms that contribute to buffering is poor. Stress has consequences for the entire organism, including a robust change in synaptic plasticity at glutamate synapses onto corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN). In females, however, this stress-induced metaplasticity is buffered by the presence of a naive partner. This buffering may be because of discrete behavioral interactions, signals in the context in which the interaction occurs (i.e., olfactory cues), or it may be influenced by local signaling events in the PVN. Here, we show that local vasopressin (VP) signaling in PVN buffers the short-term potentiation (STP) at glutamate synapses after stress. This social buffering of metaplasticity, which requires the presence of another individual, was prevented by pharmacological inhibition of the VP 1a receptor (V1aR) in female mice. Exogenous VP mimicked the effects of social buffering and reduced STP in CRH^PVN neurons from females but not males. These findings implicate VP as a potential mediator of social buffering in female mice.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In many organisms, including rodents and humans, social groups are beneficial to overall health and well-being. Moreover, it is through these social interactions that the harmful effects of stress can be mitigated, a phenomenon known as social buffering. In the present study, we describe a critical role for the neuropeptide vasopressin (VP) in social buffering of synaptic metaplasticity in stress-responsive corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) neurons in female mice. These effects of VP do not extend to social buffering of stress behaviors, suggesting this is a very precise and local form of sex-specific neuropeptide signaling.

Activity-Based Training Reverses Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Changes in Kidney Receptor Densities and Membrane Proteins

Complications in upper and lower urinary function arise after spinal cord injury (SCI), which creates a significant impact on quality of life for those affected. One upper urinary complication is SCI-induced polyuria, or the overproduction of urine, of which the underlying mechanisms have yet to be elucidated. Activity-based training (ABT) has been utilized in both animal and clinical settings as a rehabilitative therapy to improve many issues that arise after SCI, including more recently urogenital function. The goal of the current study was to identify potential mechanisms contributing to previously identified improvements in polyuria with ABT, using a male rat moderate-severe spinal contusion model. Although ABT had no significant effect on reversing injury-induced alterations of serum arginine vasopressin and urinary atrial natriuretic peptide levels, there was a dramatic effect upon the receptors of these fluid balance hormones (vasopressin receptor 2 and natriuretic peptide A receptor), as well as kidney aquaporin 2 and sodium channels. ABT changes in densities of key receptors and kidney membrane proteins involved in fluid balance after chronic SCI support the likelihood of multiple mechanisms through which exercise can positively influence urinary tract function after SCI. By understanding the mechanisms, amount, and timing regarding how ABT improves different aspects of urinary function, more targeted training strategies can be developed to optimize the functional gains within the SCI population.

Subcellular localization and internalization of the vasopressin V1B receptor

Only limited information is available on agonist-dependent changes in the subcellular localization of vasopressin V1B receptors. Our radioligand binding study of membrane preparations and intact cells revealed that a large fraction of the V1B receptor is located in the cytoplasm in unstimulated CHO cells, which is in contrast to the plasma membrane localization of the V1A and V2 receptors. Moreover, when the affinity of radiolabeled arginine-vasopressin ([3H]AVP) was compared between membrane preparations and intact cells, the affinity of [3H]AVP to the cell surface V1B receptors, but not the V1A receptors, was significantly reduced. Although the number and affinity of cell surface V1B receptors decreased, they became extensively internalized upon binding with [3H]AVP. Approximately 87% of cell surface-bound [3H]AVP was internalized and became resistant to acid wash during incubation with 1 nM [3H]AVP. By contrast, less ligand (35%) was internalized in the cells expressing the V1A receptor. Extensive internalization of the V1B receptors was partially attenuated by inhibitors of cytoskeletal proteins, siRNA against β-arrestin 2, or the removal of sodium chloride from the extracellular buffer, indicating that this internalization involves clathrin-coated pits. Together, these results indicate that the mechanism that regulates the number and affinity of V1B receptors in the plasma membrane is markedly distinct from the corresponding mechanisms for the V1A and V2 receptors and plays a critical role under stress conditions, when vasopressin release is augmented.

Arginine vasopressin enhances cell survival via a G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2/β-arrestin1/extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2-dependent pathway in H9c2 cells

Circulating levels of arginine vasopressin (AVP) are elevated during hypovolemia and during cardiac stress. AVP activates arginine vasopressin type 1A (V(1A))/Gα(q)-coupled receptors in the heart and vasculature and V(2)/Gα(s)-coupled receptors in the kidney. However, little is known regarding the signaling pathways that influence the effects of V(1A) receptor (V(1A)R) activation during cellular injury. Using hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R) as a cell injury model, we evaluated cell survival and caspase 3/7 activity in H9c2 myoblasts after treatment with AVP. Pretreatment of H9c2 cells with AVP significantly reduced H/R-induced cell death and caspase 3/7 activity, effects that were blocked via both selective V(1A)R inhibition and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK1/2) inhibition. AVP increased extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation in a concentration-dependent manner that was sensitive to MEK1/2 inhibition and V(1A)R inhibition, but not V(1B)R or V(2)R inhibition. Discrete elements of the V(1A)/Gα(q)-protein kinase C (PKC) and V(1A)/G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)/β-arrestin signaling cascades were inhibited to dissect the pathways responsible for the protective effects of V(1A)R signaling: Gα(q) (overexpression of Gq-I-ires-green fluorescent protein), PKC (administration of Ro 31-82425; 2-[8-(aminomethyl)-6,7,8,9-tetrahydropyrido[1,2-a]indol-3-yl]-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)maleimide, HCl, bisindolylmaleimide X, HCl), GRK2 [C-terminal GRK2 peptide overexpression and small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown], GRK5 (siRNA knockdown), and β-arrestin1 (siRNA knockdown). These studies demonstrated that both Gα(q)/PKC- and GRK2/β-arrestin1-dependent V(1A)R signaling were capable of inducing ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to AVP stimulation. However, AVP-mediated protection against H/R was elicited only via GRK2- and β-arrestin1-dependent signaling. These results suggest that activation of the V(1A)R in H9c2 cells mediates protective signaling via a GRK2/β-arrestin1/ERK1/2-dependent mechanism that leads to decreased caspase 3/7 activity and enhanced survival under conditions of ischemic stress.

Vasopressin V1a and V1b Receptors: From Molecules to Physiological Systems

The neurohypophysial hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP) is essential for a wide range of physiological functions, including water reabsorption, cardiovascular homeostasis, hormone secretion, and social behavior. These and other actions of AVP are mediated by at least three distinct receptor subtypes: V1a, V1b, and V2. Although the antidiuretic action of AVP and V2 receptor in renal distal tubules and collecting ducts is relatively well understood, recent years have seen an increasing understanding of the physiological roles of V1a and V1b receptors. The V1a receptor is originally found in the vascular smooth muscle and the V1b receptor in the anterior pituitary. Deletion of V1a or V1b receptor genes in mice revealed that the contributions of these receptors extend far beyond cardiovascular or hormone-secreting functions. Together with extensively developed pharmacological tools, genetically altered rodent models have advanced the understanding of a variety of AVP systems. Our report reviews the findings in this important field by covering a wide range of research, from the molecular physiology of V1a and V1b receptors to studies on whole animals, including gene knockout/knockdown studies.

New insights into the dynamic regulation of water and acid-base balance by renal epithelial cells

Maintaining tight control over body fluid and acid-base homeostasis is essential for human health and is a major function of the kidney. The collecting duct is a mosaic of two cell populations that are highly specialized to perform these two distinct processes. The antidiuretic hormone vasopressin (VP) and its receptor, the V2R, play a central role in regulating the urinary concentrating mechanism by stimulating accumulation of the aquaporin 2 (AQP2) water channel in the apical membrane of collecting duct principal cells. This increases epithelial water permeability and allows osmotic water reabsorption to occur. An understanding of the basic cell biology/physiology of AQP2 regulation and trafficking has informed the development of new potential treatments for diseases such as nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, in which the VP/V2R/AQP2 signaling axis is defective. Tubule acidification due to the activation of intercalated cells is also critical to organ function, and defects lead to several pathological conditions in humans. Therefore, it is important to understand how these "professional" proton-secreting cells respond to environmental and cellular cues. Using epididymal proton-secreting cells as a model system, we identified the soluble adenylate cyclase (sAC) as a sensor that detects luminal bicarbonate and activates the vacuolar proton-pumping ATPase (V-ATPase) via cAMP to regulate tubular pH. Renal intercalated cells also express sAC and respond to cAMP by increasing proton secretion, supporting the hypothesis that sAC could function as a luminal sensor in renal tubules to regulate acid-base balance. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of these fundamental processes.

Visualizing microtubule-dependent vasopressin type 2 receptor trafficking using a new high-affinity fluorescent vasopressin ligand

The vasopressin receptor type 2 (V2R) is the major target of vasopressin (VP) in renal epithelial cells. Although it is known that VP induces V2R internalization, accumulation in the perinuclear area, and degradation, the V2R intracellular trafficking pathways remain elusive. We visualized this process by developing a new fluorescent VP analog tagged by tetramethylrhodamine (TMR)-[Lys-(PEG)(2)-Suc-TMR(8)]VP or (VP(TMR)). This ligand is fully functional as revealed by its high binding affinity toward V2R [(K(d)) =157 ± 52 nM] and ability to increase intracellular cAMP 32-fold. VP(TMR) induced V2R internalization in LLC-PK1 cells expressing either a FLAG-tagged receptor (FLAG-V2R) or V2R C-terminally tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) (V2R-GFP). After internalization, VP(TMR) and V2R-GFP colocalized in the perinuclear area, suggesting that the hormone and receptor traffic along the same pathway. VP(TMR) and V2R colocalized initially with the early endosome markers EEA1 and Rab5, and later with the recycling and late endosome markers Rab11 and Rab25. Epifluorescence microscopy of LLC-PK1 cells expressing GFP-tagged microtubules (MT) showed that VP(TMR)-containing vesicles travel along the MT network, and even remain attached to MT during the metaphase and anaphase of mitosis. Colchicine, a MT-depolymerizing agent, abolished perinuclear accumulation of VP(TMR), and Western blot analysis showed that VP-induced V2R-GFP degradation is markedly retarded, but not abolished, by colchicine (10 μM). We conclude that the new VP(TMR) ligand is suitable for dissecting V2R and VP internalization and trafficking in cells, and that V2R trafficking and down-regulation is an MT-dependent mechanism.

Down-modulation of the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPER, from the cell surface occurs via a trans-Golgi-proteasome pathway

GPER is a G(s)-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor that has been linked to specific estrogen binding and signaling activities that are manifested by plasma membrane-associated enzymes. However, in many cell types, GPER is predominately localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and only minor amounts of receptor are detectable at the cell surface, an observation that has caused controversy regarding its role as a plasma membrane estrogen receptor. Here, we show that GPER constitutively buds intracellularly into EEA-1+ endosomes from clathrin-coated pits. Nonvisual arrestins-2/-3 do not co-localize with GPER, and expression of arrestin-2 dominant-negative mutants lacking clathrin- or β-adaptin interaction sites fails to block GPER internalization suggesting that arrestins are not involved in GPER endocytosis. Like β1AR, which recycles to the plasma membrane, GPER co-traffics with transferrin+, Rab11+ recycling endosomes. However, endocytosed GPER does not recycle to the cell surface, but instead returns to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and does not re-enter the ER. GPER is ubiquitinated at the cell surface, exhibits a short half-life (t½;) <1 h), and is protected from degradation by the proteasome inhibitor, MG132. Disruption of the TGN by brefeldin A induces the accumulation of endocytosed GPER in Rab11+ perinuclear endosomes and prevents GPER degradation. Our results provide an explanation as to why GPER is not readily detected on the cell surface in some cell types and further suggest that TGN serves as the checkpoint for degradation of endocytosed GPER.

Chronic adrenaline treatment fails to down-regulate the Del301-303-alpha2B-adrenoceptor in neuronal cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A polymorphism of the human alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor (Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor) has been described, and this receptor exhibits reduced G-protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) phosphorylation and impaired short-term desensitization. Expression of the Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor also is associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction in humans. Recent evidence from our laboratory suggests a quantitative relationship between cellular GRK3 expression levels and the sensitivity of the alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor to agonist-induced down-regulation. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to study agonist-induced down-regulation of the wild-type (WT)- and Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor in a neuronal cell model.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Haemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged WT- and Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor containing plasmids were constructed and the receptors were stably or transiently transfected in neuroblastoma/glioma hybrid NG108 cells. The expression levels in stable transfects were approximately 50 fmol x mg(-1). These cells were used to examine agonist-induced down-regulation and phosphorylation of the WT- and Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor.

KEY RESULTS

The Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor, compared with the WT-alpha(2B-)adrenoceptor, displayed reduced adrenaline-stimulated (20 microM) phosphorylation and did not down-regulate in response to adrenaline (20-1000 microM). Using immunofluorescence labelling, we observed that transiently transfected WT-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptors internalized upon adrenaline treatment whereas the Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor did not. Finally, we determined the effect of adrenaline on the Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor in cells stably over-expressing GRK3 3-fold. In spite of the GRK3 over-expression, 20-1000 microM ADR failed to down-regulate or to increase phosphorylation of the Del(301-303)-alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor in these cells.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The results suggest that the 301-303 deletion mutation of the alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor eliminates agonist-induced down-regulation, an effect that cannot be overcome by increasing agonist concentration or by modest GRK3 over-expression.

Reversible phosphorylation as a molecular switch to regulate plasma membrane targeting of acylated SH4 domain proteins

Acylated SH4 domains represent N-terminal targeting signals that anchor peripheral membrane proteins such as Src kinases in the inner leaflet of plasma membranes. Here we provide evidence for a novel regulatory mechanism that may control the levels of SH4 proteins being associated with plasma membranes. Using a fusion protein of the SH4 domain of Leishmania HASPB and GFP as a model system, we demonstrate that threonine 6 is a substrate for phosphorylation. Substitution of threonine 6 by glutamate (to mimic a phosphothreonine residue) resulted in a dramatic redistribution from plasma membranes to intracellular sites with a particular accumulation in a perinuclear region. As shown by both pharmacological inhibition and RNAi-mediated down-regulation of the threonine/ serine-specific phosphatases PP1 and PP2A, recycling back to the plasma membrane required dephosphorylation of threonine 6. We provide evidence that a cycle of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation may also be involved in intracellular targeting of other SH4 proteins such as the Src kinase Yes.

Regulation of D6 chemokine scavenging activity by ligand- and Rab11-dependent surface up-regulation

The decoy receptor D6 plays a nonredundant role in the control of inflammatory processes through scavenging of inflammatory chemokines. However it remains unclear how it is regulated. Here we show that D6 scavenging activity relies on unique trafficking properties. Under resting conditions, D6 constitutively recycled through both a rapid wortmannin (WM)-sensitive and a slower brefeldin A (BFA)-sensitive pathway, maintaining low levels of surface expression that required both Rab4 and Rab11 activities. In contrast to "conventional" chemokine receptors that are down-regulated by cognate ligands, chemokine engagement induced a dose-dependent BFA-sensitive Rab11-dependent D6 re-distribution to the cell membrane and a corresponding increase in chemokine degradation rate. Thus, the energy-expensive constitutive D6 cycling through Rab11 vesicles allows a rapid, ligand concentration-dependent increase of chemokine scavenging activity by receptor redistribution to the plasma membrane. D6 is not regulated at a transcriptional level in a variety of cellular contexts, thus ligand-dependent optimization of its scavenger performance represents a rapid and unique mechanism allowing D6 to control inflammation.

Mouse models and the urinary concentrating mechanism in the new millennium

Our understanding of urinary concentrating and diluting mechanisms at the end of the 20th century was based largely on data from renal micropuncture studies, isolated perfused tubule studies, tissue analysis studies and anatomical studies, combined with mathematical modeling. Despite extensive data, several key questions remained to be answered. With the advent of the 21st century, a new approach, transgenic and knockout mouse technology, is providing critical new information about urinary concentrating processes. The central goal of this review is to summarize findings in transgenic and knockout mice pertinent to our understanding of the urinary concentrating mechanism, focusing chiefly on mice in which expression of specific renal transporters or receptors has been deleted. These include the major renal water channels (aquaporins), urea transporters, ion transporters and channels (NHE3, NKCC2, NCC, ENaC, ROMK, ClC-K1), G protein-coupled receptors (type 2 vasopressin receptor, prostaglandin receptors, endothelin receptors, angiotensin II receptors), and signaling molecules. These studies shed new light on several key questions concerning the urinary concentrating mechanism including: 1) elucidation of the role of water absorption from the descending limb of Henle in countercurrent multiplication, 2) an evaluation of the feasibility of the passive model of Kokko-Rector and Stephenson, 3) explication of the role of inner medullary collecting duct urea transport in water conservation, 4) an evaluation of the role of tubuloglomerular feedback in maintenance of appropriate distal delivery rates for effective regulation of urinary water excretion, and 5) elucidation of the importance of water reabsorption in the connecting tubule versus the collecting duct for maintenance of water balance.

Aquaporin 2 (AQP2) and vasopressin type 2 receptor (V2R) endocytosis in kidney epithelial cells: AQP2 is located in 'endocytosis-resistant' membrane domains after vasopressin treatment

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Aquaporin 2 (AQP2) plays an important, VP (vasopressin)-regulated role in water reabsorption by the kidney. The amount of AQP2 expressed at the surface of principal cells results from an equilibrium between the AQP2 in intracellular vesicles and the AQP2 on the plasma membrane. VP shifts the equilibrium in favour of the plasma membrane and this allows osmotic equilibration to occur between the collecting duct lumen and the interstitial space. Membrane accumulation of AQP2 could result from a VP-induced increase in exocytosis, a decrease in endocytosis, or both. In the present study, we further investigated AQP2 accumulation at the cell surface, and compared it with V2R (VP type 2 receptor) trafficking using cells that express epitope-tagged AQP2 and V2R.

RESULTS

Endocytosis of V2R and of AQP2 are independent events that can be separated temporally and spatially. The burst of endocytosis seen after VP addition to target cells, when AQP2 accumulates at the cell surface, is primarily due to internalization of the V2R. Increased endocytosis is not induced by forskolin, which also induces membrane accumulation of AQP2 by direct stimulation of adenylate cyclase. This indicates that cAMP elevation is not the primary cause of the initial, VP-induced endocytic process. After VP exposure, AQP2 is not located in endosomes with internalized V2R. Instead, it remains at the cell surface in 'endocytosis-resistant' membrane domains, visualized by confocal imaging. After VP washout, AQP2 is progressively internalized with the fluid-phase marker FITC-dextran, indicating that VP washout releases an endocytotic block that maintains AQP2 at the cell surface. Finally, polarized application of VP to filter-grown cells shows that apical VP can induce basolateral endocytosis and V2R down-regulation, and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

After VP stimulation of renal epithelial cells, AQP2 accumulates at the cell surface, while the V2R is actively internalized. This endocytotic block may involve a reduced capacity of phosphorylated AQP2 to interact with components of the endocytotic machinery. In addition, a complex cross-talk exists between the apical and basolateral plasma-membrane domains with respect to endocytosis and V2R down-regulation. This may be of physiological significance in down-regulating the VP response in the kidney in vivo.

A Role for ADP-ribosylation Factor 6 in the Processing of G-protein-coupled Receptors

After agonist-induced internalization, the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) does not recycle to the plasma membrane. The ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) proteins initiate vesicular intracellular traffic by promoting the recruitment of adaptor proteins; thus, we sought to determine whether ARF6 could promote V2R recycling. Neither the agonist-induced internalization nor the recycling of the V2R was regulated by ARF6, but a constitutively active mutant of ARF6 reduced cell-surface V2Rs 10-fold in the absence of agonist treatment. Visualization of the ARF6 mutant-expressing cells revealed a vacuolar-staining pattern of the V2R instead of the normal plasma membrane expression. Analysis of V2R maturation revealed that reduced cell-surface expression was due to the diminished ability of the newly synthesized receptor to migrate from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi network. The same mechanism affected processing of the V1aR and acetylcholine M2 receptors. Therefore, ARF6 controls the exit of the V2 and other receptors from the endoplasmic reticulum in addition to its established role in the trafficking of plasma-membrane-derived vesicles.

Downregulation of the vasopressin type 2 receptor after vasopressin-induced internalization: involvement of a lysosomal degradation pathway

Vasopressin (VP) increases urinary concentration by signaling through the vasopressin receptor (V2R) in collecting duct principal cells. After downregulation, V2R reappears at the cell surface via an unusually slow (several hours) “recycling” pathway. To examine this pathway, we expressed V2R-green fluorescent protein (GFP) in LLC-PK1a cells. V2R-GFP showed characteristics similar to those of wild-type V2R, including high affinity for VP and adenylyl cyclase stimulation. V2R-GFP was located mainly in the plasma membrane in unstimulated cells, but it colocalized with the lysosomal marker Lysotracker after VP-induced internalization. Western blot analysis of V2R-GFP showed a broad 57- to 68-kDa band and a doublet at 46 and 52 kDa before VP treatment. After 4-h VP exposure, the 57- to 68-kDa band lost 50% of its intensity, whereas the lower 46-kDa band increased by 200%. The lysosomal inhibitor chloroquine abolished this VP effect, whereas lactacystin, a proteasome inhibitor, had no effect. Incubating cells at 20°C to block trafficking from the trans-Golgi network reduced V2R membrane fluorescence, and a perinuclear patch developed. Cycloheximide reduced the intensity of this patch, showing that newly synthesized V2R-GFP contributed significantly to its appearance. Cycloheximide also inhibited the reappearance of cell surface V2R after downregulation. We conclude that after downregulation, V2R-GFP is delivered to lysosomes and degraded. Reappearance of V2R at the cell surface depends on new protein synthesis, partially explaining the long time lag needed to fully reestablish V2R at the cell surface after downregulation. This degradative pathway may be an adaptive response to allow receptor-ligand association in the hypertonic and acidic environment of the renal medulla.

Subtype-specific sorting of the ETA endothelin receptor by a novel endocytic recycling signal for G protein-coupled receptors

We have previously reported that endocytic sorting of ET(A) endothelin receptors to the recycling pathway is dependent on a signal residing in the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal region. The aim of the present work was to characterize the carboxyl-terminal recycling motif of the ET(A) receptor. Assay of truncation mutants of the ET(A) receptor with increasing deletions of the carboxyl-terminal tail revealed that amino acids 390 to 406 contained information critical for the ability of the receptor to recycle. This peptide sequence displayed significant sequence similarity to several protein segments confirmed by X-ray crystallography to adopt antiparallel beta-strand structures (beta-finger). One of these segments was the beta-finger motif of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase reported to function as an internal PDZ (postsynaptic density-95/disc-large/zona occludens) domain-binding ligand. Based on these findings, the three-dimensional structure of the recycling motif of ET(A) receptor was predicted to attain a beta-finger conformation acting as an internal PDZ ligand. Site-directed mutagenesis at residues that would be crucial to the structural integrity of the putative beta-finger conformation or PDZ ligand function prevented recycling of the ET(A) receptor. Analysis of more than 300 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) identified 35 different human GPCRs with carboxylterminal sequence patterns that fulfilled the structural criteria of an internal PDZ ligand. Among these are several receptors reported to follow a recycling pathway. In conclusion, recycling of ET(A) receptor is mediated by a motif with the structural characteristics of an internal PDZ ligand. This structural motif may represent a more general principle of endocytic sorting of GPCRs.

Rab11 regulates the recycling and lysosome targeting of beta2-adrenergic receptors

The pericentriolar recycling endosome (RE) may be an alternative compartment through which some beta2-adrenergic receptors (beta2ARs) recycle from early endosomes to the cell surface during prolonged exposure to agonist. For the transferrin receptor, CXCR2, and the M4-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, trafficking through the RE and receptor recycling is regulated by the small GTPase rab11. The precise role of the RE and rab11 in regulating the cellular trafficking of the beta2AR is not understood. We therefore monitored trafficking of beta2ARs in HEK293 cells following the modulation of rab11 activity. Expression of a rab11 mutant deficient in GTP binding (as a fusion between enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and the rab11S25N mutant) significantly slowed receptor recycling to the cell surface from dispersed transferrin-positive peripheral vesicles following a brief exposure to agonist. The agonist was applied at a time when receptors have undergone only one or two rounds of endocytosis and recycling. In cells overexpressing wild-type rab11, beta2ARs localized to a rab11-positive compartment and the rate of beta2AR recycling to the cell surface was reduced, but only after prolonged exposure to agonist and multiple rounds of receptor endocytosis and recycling. This effect was associated with impaired beta2AR trafficking to lysosomes and receptor proteolysis, whereas the sorting of low-density lipoprotein from transferrin-positive vesicles to late endosomes and lysosomes was not affected. These data highlight a pivotal role for rab11 in regulating the traffic of a G protein-coupled receptor at the level of the RE, where modulation of rab11 activity dictates the balance between receptor recycling and downregulation during prolonged exposure to agonist.

Regulation of V2 vasopressin receptor degradation by agonist-promoted ubiquitination

The seven-transmembrane-spanning vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) is a Gs-coupled receptor that is rapidly phosphorylated and internalized following stimulation with the agonist, arginine-vasopressin. Herein, we show that the V2R is ubiquitinated following agonist stimulation. V2R-ubiquitination is not observed in a beta-arrestin1,2 deleted mouse fibroblast cell line and is restored following introduction of beta-arrestin2, thus indicating that beta-arrestin2 is required for the ubiquitination of V2R. A mutant V2R (K268R) that is not ubiquitinated still activates Gs and internalizes with similar kinetics as the wild type receptor. Unstimulated wild type and K268R mutant receptors degrade at similar rates and have comparable half-lives of 217 +/- 17 and 245 +/- 29 min as determined by pulse-chase experiments. However, following agonist stimulation, the rate of receptor degradation for the wild type is enhanced (half-life of 69 +/- 19 min), whereas that of the mutant is only minimally affected (half-life of 188 +/- 11 min). These data suggest that V2R levels are regulated through at least two processes. In the absence of agonist stimulation, a slow degradative pathway operates that is independent of receptor ubiquitination. However, receptor stimulation leads to rapid beta-arrestin2-dependent ubiquitination of the receptor and increased degradation.

Ligand internalization by cloned neuropeptide Y Y5 receptors excludes Y2 and Y4 receptor-selective peptides

In human embryonic kidney-293 (HEK-293) cells, the cloned human neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor saturably internalized agonists, with the rank order of neuropeptide Y-(19-23)-[Gly1,Ser3,Gln4,Thr6,Ala31,Aib32,Gln34]human pancreatic polypeptide (neuropeptide Y-Aib-pancreatic polypeptide)>human neuropeptide Y>porcine peptide YY>[Pro34]human peptide YY>[Leu31,Pro34]human peptide YY>>human peptide YY-(3-36). Human pancreatic polypeptide competed [125I]neuropeptide Y binding and internalization in neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor-expressing cells, but itself showed no internalization. The internalization was strongly dependent on temperature. The surface binding, and especially the internalization, of human neuropeptide Y were highly sensitive to the clathrin network inhibitor phenylarsine oxide, and to the cholesterol-complexing antibiotic filipin III. The internalized ligands were present in particles corresponding to secondary endosomes in Percoll gradients, but especially in particles banding with the acid hexosaminidase lysosomal marker. At any temperature tested, internalization of the neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor driven by human neuropeptide Y in HEK-293 cells was much slower than the internalization of the neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor reported in the same cells, or in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor subtype could be the metabotropic receptor responding to protracted challenges by neuropeptide Y-like peptides, and its density could be little sensitive to concentration of extracellular agonists.

Science review: Vasopressin and the cardiovascular system part 1--receptor physiology

Vasopressin is emerging as a rational therapy for vasodilatory shock states. Unlike other vasoconstrictor agents, vasopressin also has vasodilatory properties. The goal of the present review is to explore the vascular actions of vasopressin. In part 1 of the review we discuss structure, signaling pathways, and tissue distributions of the classic vasopressin receptors, namely V₁ vascular, V₂ renal, V₃ pituitary and oxytocin receptors, and the P₂ class of purinoreceptors. Knowledge of the function and distribution of vasopressin receptors is key to understanding the seemingly contradictory actions of vasopressin on the vascular system. In part 2 of the review we discuss the effects of vasopressin on vascular smooth muscle and the heart, and we summarize clinical studies of vasopressin in shock states.

Antidepressant-induced switch of beta 1-adrenoceptor trafficking as a mechanism for drug action

Reduction in surface beta(1)-adrenoceptor (beta1AR) density is thought to play a critical role in mediating the therapeutic long term effects of antidepressants. Since antidepressants are neither agonists nor antagonists for G protein-coupled receptors, receptor density must be regulated through processes independent of direct receptor activation. Endocytosis and recycling of the beta1AR fused to green fluorescent protein at its carboxyl-terminus (beta1AR-GFP) were analyzed by confocal fluorescence microscopy of live cells and complementary ligand binding studies. In stably transfected C6 glioblastoma cells, beta1AR-GFP displayed identical ligand-binding isotherms and adenylyl cyclase activation as native beta1AR. Upon exposure to isoproterenol, a fraction of beta1AR-GFP (10-15%) internalized rapidly and colocalized with endocytosed transferrin receptors in an early endosomal compartment in the perinuclear region. Chronic treatment with the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine (DMI) did not affect internalization characteristics of beta1AR-GFP when challenged with isoproterenol. However, internalized receptors were not able to recycle back to the cell surface in DMI-treated cells, whereas recycling of transferrin receptors was not affected. Endocytosed receptors were absent from structures that stained with fluorescently labeled dextran, and inhibition of lysosomal protease activity did not restore receptor recycling, indicating that beta1AR-GFP did not immediately enter the lysosomal compartment. The data suggest a new mode of drug action causing a "switch" of receptor fate from a fast recycling pathway to a slowly exchanging perinuclear compartment. Antidepressant-induced reduction of receptor surface expression may thus be caused by modulation of receptor trafficking routes.

An expanded V2 receptor retention signal

Following ligand-promoted internalization the human type 2 vasopressin receptor (hV2R) is not recycled to the cell surface after removal of the agonist. A retention motif consisting of a serine triplet present in the cytoplasmic tail was previously found to require for retention, but serine 357, and threonines 359, 360 located upstream were not examined. Evidence is now presented that substitution of these amino acids did not change V2 internalization although it reduced the levels of arginine vasopressin (AVP)-induced phosphorylation as compared to the wild type (WT). Contrary to the WT hV2R, these mutant receptors were recycled to the cell surface after a 2 h incubation in the absence of AVP identifying these changed residues as additional members of the retention motif of the hV2R.

G protein-coupled receptors: dominant players in cell-cell communication

The G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most numerous and the most diverse type of receptors (1-5% of the complete invertebrate and vertebrate genomes). They transduce messages as different as odorants, nucleotides, nucleosides, peptides, lipids, and proteins. There are at least eight families of GPCRs that show no sequence similarities and that use different domains to bind ligands and activate a similar set of G proteins. Homo- and heterodimerization of GPCRs seem to be the rule, and in some cases an absolute requirement, for activation. There are about 100 orphan GPCRs in the human genome which will be used to find new message molecules. Mutations of GPCRs are responsible for a wide range of genetic diseases. The importance of GPCRs in physiological processes is illustrated by the fact that they are the target of the majority of therapeutical drugs and drugs of abuse.

A transplantable sorting signal that is sufficient to mediate rapid recycling of G protein-coupled receptors

The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor and delta opioid receptor represent distinct G protein-coupled receptors that undergo agonist-induced endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits but differ significantly in their postendocytic sorting between recycling and degradative membrane pathways, respectively. Previous results indicate that a distal portion of the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, which engages in PDZ domain-mediated protein interaction, is required for efficient recycling of receptors after agonist-induced endocytosis. Here we demonstrate that a four-residue sequence (DSLL) comprising the core of this protein interaction domain functions as a transplantable endocytic sorting signal that is sufficient to re-route endocytosed delta opioid receptor into a rapid recycling pathway, to inhibit proteolytic down-regulation of receptors, and to mediate receptor-autonomous sorting of mutant receptors from the wild type allele when co-expressed in the same cells. These observations define a transplantable signal mediating rapid recycling of a heterologous G protein-coupled receptor, and they suggest that rapid recycling of certain membrane proteins does not occur by bulk membrane flow but is instead mediated by a specific endocytic sorting mechanism.

The long and the short cycle. Alternative intracellular routes for trafficking of G-protein-coupled receptors

The C terminus of the human V2 vasopressin receptor contains multiple phosphorylation sites including a cluster of amino acids that when phosphorylated prevents the return of the internalized receptor to the cell surface. To identify the step where the recycling process was interrupted, the trafficking of the V2 receptor was compared with that of the recycling V1a receptor after exposure to ligand. Initially, both receptors internalized in small peripheral endosomes, but a physical separation of their endocytic pathways was subsequently detected. The V1a receptor remained evenly distributed throughout the cytosol, whereas the V2 receptor accumulated in a large aggregation of vesicles in the proximity of the nucleus where it colocalized with the transferrin receptor and Rab11, a small GTP-binding protein that is concentrated in the perinuclear recycling compartment; only marginal colocalization of Rab11 with the V1a receptor was observed. Thus, the V2 receptor was sequestered in the perinuclear recycling compartment. Targeting to the perinuclear recycling compartment was determined by the receptor subtype and not by the inability to recycle, since the mutation S363A in the phosphorylation-dependent retention signal generated a V2 receptor that was recycled via the same compartment. The perinuclear recycling compartment was enriched in beta-arrestin after internalization of either wild type V2 receptor or its recycling mutant, indicating that long term interaction between the receptors and arrestin was not responsible for the intracellular retention. Thus, the fully phosphorylated retention domain overrides the natural tendency of the V2 receptor to recycle and, by preventing its exit from the perinuclear recycling compartment, interrupts its transit via the "long cycle." The data suggest that the inactivation of the domain, possibly by dephosphorylation, triggers the return of the receptor from the perinuclear compartment to the plasma membrane.

Vasopressin receptors

The biological effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) are mediated by three receptor subtypes: the V1a and V1b receptors that activate phospholipases via Gq/11, and the V2 receptor that activates adenylyl cyclase by interacting with Gs. Isolation of the cDNAs encoding the V1a and V1b receptor subtypes explained the tissue variability of V1 antagonist binding, whereas identification of the cDNA and gene encoding the V2 receptor provided the information to identify the mutations responsible for X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Mutations that abrogate the production and/or release of AVP from the pituitary have diabetes insipidus as their most dramatic manifestation, indicating that the maintenance of water homeostasis is the most important physiological role of this neuropeptide. Evidence for a significant role of AVP in blood pressure control, although actively sought, has been scant.