Can intracellular signalling pathways predict developmental abnormalities?

Critical periods for the role of oxidative stress in the developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and terbutaline, alone or in combination

The developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos (CPF) involves mechanisms other than inhibition of cholinesterase. In the current study, we examined the ability of CPF to evoke lipid peroxidation in the developing brain of fetal and neonatal rats. CPF given to pregnant rats on gestational days 17-20 or to neonatal rats on postnatal days 1-4, failed to elicit increases in thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) in brain regions even when the dose was raised above the threshold for systemic toxicity and hepatic damage. In contrast, CPF administration during the second postnatal week, the peak period of neuronal cell differentiation and synaptogenesis, did evoke significant increases in TBARS even at a dose devoid of systemic toxicity. Terbutaline, which is chemically unrelated to CPF and which stimulates neuronal cell metabolism through direct actions on beta-adrenoceptors, also elicited oxidative damage in the developing brain with greater sensitivity in the second postnatal week. These results indicate that diverse compounds can exert convergent effects on brain development through their shared potential to elicit oxidative stress, and that the net outcome is dependent upon specific developmental stages in which metabolic demand is especially high. Furthermore, given the common use of terbutaline in the therapy of preterm labor, and the nearly ubiquitous exposure of the human population to organophosphorus pesticides, the combined oxidative burden of exposure to both agents may contribute to the worsened neurodevelopmental outcomes noted in animal models of such dual exposures.

Developmental toxicity of terbutaline: critical periods for sex-selective effects on macromolecules and DNA synthesis in rat brain, heart, and liver

beta-Adrenoceptors (betaARs) control cell replication/differentiation, and during development, signaling is not subject to desensitization. We examined the effects of terbutaline, a beta(2)AR agonist used as a tocolytic, on development in rat brain regions and peripheral tissues with high betaAR concentrations. Prenatal terbutaline (gestational days 17-20) decreased cell numbers (DNA content) in the fetal brain and liver. Early postnatal exposure (PN2-5) reduced DNA synthesis in early-developing brain regions of females, with sensitization of the effect upon repeated terbutaline administration; after multiple terbutaline injections, DNA content was reduced in male cerebellum. The cerebellum was targeted later (PN11-14), exhibiting decreased DNA synthesis in both sexes; in contrast, cardiac DNA synthesis decreased after one injection but increased after the fourth daily injection. Our results suggest that excessive betaAR stimulation by terbutaline alters cell development in brain regions and peripheral tissues, with the net effect depending on sex and the timing of exposure. These effects may contribute to neuropsychiatric, cognitive, cardiovascular, and metabolic abnormalities reported in the offspring of women treated with beta-agonist tocolytics.

Antenatal glucocorticoids and the developing brain: mechanisms of action

Glucocorticoids are critical for normal brain development. There is no doubt that prenatal treatment with synthetic glucocorticoid affords great benefit to the preterm infant. However, animal studies, now carried out in many species, indicate that there may be some long-term physiological costs of early exposure to excess glucocorticoid, and that these appear sex-dependent. Further, the effects may not become apparent until later life. Given the dynamics of corticosteroid receptor systems in late gestation, it is likely that there are critical windows of development when specific regions of the brain are more sensitive to the influence of synthetic glucocorticoid. Once such windows have been identified it will be possible to target prenatal treatments, so as to maximize benefit and reduce risk of long-term effects. Notwithstanding, the data reviewed below indicate that caution should be exercised in the use of multiple course glucocorticoid therapy during pregnancy.

Antenatal glucocorticoids and programming of the developing CNS

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are essential for many aspects of normal brain development. However, there is growing evidence from a number of species that exposure of the fetal brain to excess GC, at critical stages of development, can have life-long effects on behavior and neuroendocrine function. The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, which is central to the integration of the individual's endocrine and behavioral response to stress, appears highly sensitive to excess GC exposure during development. A number of animal studies have shown that exposure to synthetic GCs in utero results in adult offspring that exhibit hyperactivity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. This will have a long-term impact on health, inasmuch as increased life-long exposure to endogenous GC has been linked to the premature onset of diseases associated with aging. The mechanisms involved in the permanent programming of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal function and behavior are not well understood. Synthetic GCs are used extensively to promote pulmonary maturation in fetuses at risk of being delivered before term. Therefore, it is important that we understand the potential long-term consequences of prenatal GC exposure on brain development as well as the underlying mechanisms involved. This review will explore the current state of knowledge in this rapidly expanding field.

Early alterations of polyamine metabolism induced after acute administration of clenbuterol in mouse heart

An acute treatment of mice with clenbuterol, a beta-adrenergic agonist, produced a marked increase of polyamines levels in heart, particularly during the early phase of administration of the drug. A single dose of 1.5 mg/kg caused as much as a 10 fold induction in activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and 3 to 4 fold increase in levels of putrescine, spermidine and spermine in mouse heart. Maximum changes were observed 3 to 4 hours post-administration of clenbuterol. This treatment did not produce any change in S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity. The induction of cardiac ODC by clenbuterol was also dose dependent with a peak at about 5 micromol/kg. Co-administration of difluoromethylornithine, an irreversible inhibitor of ODC, or propranolol, a nonspecific beta-antagonist, with clenbuterol completely prevented the induction of ODC activity as well as the increase in polyamine levels in heart. However, pretreatment with alprenolol or metoprolol, the specific beta1 and beta2-antagonists, respectively, produced only partial prevention. The cardiac ODC from controls as well as clenbuterol treated mice exhibited similar affinity (Km) for its substrate, ornithine, while maximum enzyme activity (Vmax) was about 14 fold higher in clenbuterol treated mouse heart than in the control. Clenbuterol produced no change in the level of specific ODC mRNA or the protein, but the enzyme from the drug-treated mouse heart was considerably more stable than the control. Pretreatment of mice with either cycloheximide or actinomycin D followed by administration of clenbuterol could not prevent the induction in ODC activity suggesting that de novo biosynthesis of the enzyme protein or ODC mRNA was not responsible for induction of ODC activity. Post-translational changes in ODC may be responsible for an early increase of ODC activity due to clenbuterol treatment.

Glucocorticoid administration alters nuclear transcription factors in fetal rat brain: implications for the use of antenatal steroids

A recent Consensus Conference endorsed antenatal steroid use in prematurity, but indicated the need for future work on molecular and cellular effects on the developing brain. In the current study, pregnant rats were given dexamethasone during late gestation, in doses spanning those recommended for use, and effects on nuclear transcription factors were evaluated. Within the first hour after a single dose of dexamethasone, and intensifying over 4 h, marked induction of brain c-fos was seen. With repeated administration, c-fos became suppressed in some brain regions, but remained elevated in others. Dexamethasone also elicited suppression of the AP-1 family of nuclear binding proteins, but with a slower time course than seen for c-fos induction. The magnitude of the effects of late gestational exposure to dexamethasone on these transcription factors was comparable to those seen when repeated doses were administered to midgestation embryos in the context of dysmorphogenesis. Similarly, the effects on brain c-fos expression were substantially greater than those in the liver, an archetypal glucocorticoid target tissue. These results indicate that even a single, low dose of glucocorticoids used in late gestation, can disrupt the transcription factors that regulate brain cell differentiation.

Cellular mechanisms for developmental toxicity of chlorpyrifos: targeting the adenylyl cyclase signaling cascade

Developmental neurotoxicity caused by chlorpyrifos exposure is generally thought to target cholinesterase but chlorpyrifos may also act on cellular intermediates, such as adenylyl cyclase, that serve global functions in the coordination of cell development. In the current study, neonatal rats were exposed to apparently subtoxic doses of chlorpyrifos (no weight loss, no mortality) either on Postnatal Days 1-4 or on Postnatal Days 11-14, and the effects on components of the adenylyl cyclase cascade were evaluated in brain regions that are enriched (forebrain) or sparse (cerebellum) in cholinergic innervation, as well as in a nonneural tissue (heart). In all three, chlorpyrifos evoked deficits in multiple components of the adenylyl cyclase cascade: expression and activity of adenylyl cyclase itself, functioning of G-proteins that link neurotransmitter and hormone receptors to cyclase activity, and expression of neurotransmitter receptors that act through this cascade. Disruption of signaling function was not restricted to transduction of cholinergic signals but rather extended to adrenergic signals as well. In most cases, the adverse effects were not evident during the immediate period of chlorpyrifos administration, but appeared after a delay of several days. These results suggest that chlorpyrifos can affect cell development by altering the activity and reactivity of the adenylyl cyclase signaling cascade, a major control point for trophic regulation of cell differentiation. The effects are not restricted to cholinergic targets, nor even to the central nervous system. Hence, disruption of cell development by chlorpyrifos is likely to be more widespread than previously thought.