Enlargement of umbilical incision in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy is frequently necessary: An argument for the single incision approach?

Single-incision versus four-incision laparoscopic transfistulous bile duct exploration for Mirizzi syndrome type II

BACKGROUND

We developed laparoscopic transfistulous bile duct exploration (LTBDE) for Mirizzi syndrome (MS) McSherry type II in September 2011. Then, single-incision LTBDE (SILTBDE) was adopted as a preferred technique since August 2013. This retrospective study aims to analyze the outcome of LTBDE in 7.7 years and to compare SILTBDE with four-incision LTBDE (4ILTBDE).

METHODS

Seventeen consecutive patients underwent LTBDE for MS McSherry type II from September 2011 to May 2019. Transfistulous removal of the impacted stone(s), choledochoscopic bile duct exploration, and primary closure of the gallbladder remnant were performed without biliary drainage.

RESULTS

The sex ratio is 12:5 (male: female) with an average age of 39.4 ± 10.3 (24-56) years. Ten patients (58.8%) had their diagnoses of MS established by preoperative imaging. According to the Csendes classification, three type II (17.6%), nine type III (52.9%), and five type IV (29.4%) were identified. The operative time was 264.8 ± 60.3 min (156-358 min). The stone clearance rate was 100%. The postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 ± 1.9 (2-10) days. No procedure was converted to an open operation. Two postoperative transient hyperamylasemia (11.8%) and one superficial wound infection (5.9%) occurred and all recovered well under conservative treatment (Clavien-Dindo grade I). During an average 2.2-year follow-up period, no biliary stricture or stone recurrence occurred. No significant difference exists between the SILTBDE and 4ILTBDE groups. Nevertheless, an insignificant trend of shorter postoperative hospital stay was observed in the former. A diagnosis of MS Csendes type IV implicates prolonged total and postoperative hospital stays (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

LTBDE is safe and efficacious for MS McSherry type II. It provides a simple solution for various types of MS and avoids undesirable complications following bilioenteric anastomosis. SILTBDE is comparable to 4ILTBDE for selected patients. Patients with MS Csendes type IV need more time to recover after surgery.

Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis

Purpose. To date, no evidence supports the retrieval of the gallbladder through a specific trocar site, and this choice is left to surgeons’ preference. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the influence of the trocar site used to extract the gallbladder on postoperative outcomes. Methods. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases was performed. Terms used were: (“gallbladder” OR “cholecystectomy”) AND “umbilical” AND (“epigastric” OR “subxiphoid”). Randomized trials comparing the gallbladder retrieval from different trocar sites were considered for further analysis. Results. Literature search revealed 145 articles, of which 7 matched inclusion criteria and reported adequate data about postoperative pain, operative time, port-site infections, and hernias. A total of 876 patients were included, and the gallbladder was extracted through epigastric or umbilical trocar site in 441 and in 435 patients, respectively. A statistically significant difference among groups was noted in terms of postoperative pain at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours in favor of the umbilical trocar site ( P < .001). No significant differences were noted in postoperative hernia and infection rate, nor in terms of operative time. Conclusions. This meta-analysis shows a statistically significant reduction in terms of postoperative pain at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery when the gallbladder is extracted through the umbilical port. Retrieval time, infections, and hernias rate implicate no contraindication for the choice of a specific trocar site to extract specimens. Despite limitations of this study, the umbilical trocar should be favored as the first choice to retrieve the gallbladder.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for biliary tract disease

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, has been employed in various fields to minimize traumatic effects over the last two decades. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been the most frequently studied SILS to date. Hundreds of studies on SILC have failed to present conclusive results. Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been small in scale and have been conducted under ideal operative conditions. The role of SILC in complicated scenarios remains uncertain. As common bile duct exploration (CBDE) methods have been used for more than one hundred years, laparoscopic CBDE (LCBDE) has emerged as an effective, demanding, and infrequent technique employed during the laparoscopic era. Likewise, laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis is difficult to carry out, with only a few studies have been published on the approach. The application of SILS to CBDE and biliary-enteric anastomosis is extremely rare, and such innovative procedures are only carried out by a number of specialized groups across the globe. Herein we present a thorough and detailed analysis of SILC in terms of operative techniques, training and learning curves, safety and efficacy levels, recovery trends, and costs by reviewing RCTs conducted over the past three years and two recently updated meta-analyses. All existing literature on single-incision LCBDE and single-incision laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy has been reviewed to describe these two demanding techniques.