Treatment of bipolar depressive mood disorders: Algorithms for pharmacotherapy

The International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology (CINP) Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder in Adults (CINP-BD-2017), Part 3: The Clinical Guidelines

Background

The current paper introduces the actual International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology clinical guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Concept and structure of the guidelines

The current clinical guidelines are based on evidence-based data, but they also intend to be clinically useful, while a rigid algorithm was developed on the basis of firm evidence alone. Monotherapy was prioritized over combination therapy. There are separate recommendations for each of the major phases of bipolar disorder expressed as a 5-step algorithm.

Discussion

The current International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology clinical guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder are the most up-to-date guidance and are as evidence based as possible. They also include recommendations concerning the use of psychotherapeutic interventions, again on the basis of available evidence. This adherence of the workgroup to the evidence in a clinically oriented way helped to clarify the role of specific antidepressants and traditional agents like lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine. The additional focus on specific clinical characteristics, including predominant polarity, mixed features, and rapid cycling, is also a novel approach. Many issues need further studies, data are sparse and insufficient, and many questions remain unanswered. The most important and still unmet need is to merge all the guidelines that concern different phases of the illness into a single one and in this way consider BD as a single unified disorder, which is the real world fact. However, to date the research data do not permit such a unified approach.

The International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology (CINP) Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder in Adults (CINP-BD-2017), Part 2: Review, Grading of the Evidence, and a Precise Algorithm

Background

The current paper includes a systematic search of the literature, a detailed presentation of the results, and a grading of treatment options in terms of efficacy and tolerability/safety.

Material and Methods

The PRISMA method was used in the literature search with the combination of the words 'bipolar,' 'manic,' 'mania,' 'manic depression,' and 'manic depressive' with 'randomized,' and 'algorithms' with 'mania,' 'manic,' 'bipolar,' 'manic-depressive,' or 'manic depression.' Relevant web pages and review articles were also reviewed.

Results

The current report is based on the analysis of 57 guideline papers and 531 published papers related to RCTs, reviews, posthoc, or meta-analysis papers to March 25, 2016. The specific treatment options for acute mania, mixed episodes, acute bipolar depression, maintenance phase, psychotic and mixed features, anxiety, and rapid cycling were evaluated with regards to efficacy. Existing treatment guidelines were also reviewed. Finally, Tables reflecting efficacy and recommendation levels were created that led to the development of a precise algorithm that still has to prove its feasibility in everyday clinical practice.

Conclusions

A systematic literature search was conducted on the pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder to identify all relevant random controlled trials pertaining to all aspects of bipolar disorder and graded the data according to a predetermined method to develop a precise treatment algorithm for management of various phases of bipolar disorder. It is important to note that the some of the recommendations in the treatment algorithm were based on the secondary outcome data from posthoc analyses.

Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder: a report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry

The current statement is a systematic review of the available data concerning the efficacy of medication treatment of bipolar disorder (BP). A systematic MEDLINE search was made concerning the treatment of BP (RCTs) with the names of treatment options as keywords. The search was updated on 10 March 2012. The literature suggests that lithium, first and second generation antipsychotics and valproate and carbamazepine are efficacious in the treatment of acute mania. Quetiapine and the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination are also efficacious for treating bipolar depression. Antidepressants should only be used in combination with an antimanic agent, because they can induce switching to mania/hypomania/mixed states/rapid cycling when utilized as monotherapy. Lithium, olanzapine, quetiapine and aripiprazole are efficacious during the maintenance phase. Lamotrigine is efficacious in the prevention of depression, and it remains to be clarified whether it is also efficacious for mania. There is some evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions as an adjunctive treatment to medication. Electroconvulsive therapy is an option for refractory patients. In acute manic patients who are partial responders to lithium/valproate/carbamazepine, adding an antipsychotic is a reasonable choice. The combination with best data in acute bipolar depression is lithium plus lamotrigine. Patients stabilized on combination treatment might do worse if shifted to monotherapy during maintenance, and patients could benefit with add-on treatment with olanzapine, valproate, an antidepressant, or lamotrigine, depending on the index acute phase. A variety of treatment options for BP are available today, but still unmet needs are huge. Combination therapy may improve the treatment outcome but it also carries more side-effect burden. Further research is necessary as well as the development of better guidelines and algorithms for the step-by-step rational treatment.

The contemporary face of bipolar illness: complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenges

Manic depression, or bipolar disorder, is a multifaceted illness with an inevitably complex treatment. The current article summarizes the current status of our knowledge and practice concerning its diagnosis and treatment. While the prototypic clinical picture concerns the "classic" bipolar disorder, today mixed episodes with incomplete recovery and significant psychosocial impairment are more frequent. The clinical picture of these mixed episodes is variable, eludes contemporary classification systems, and possibly includes a constellation of mental syndromes currently classified elsewhere. Treatment includes the careful combination of lithium, antiepileptics, atypical antipsychotics, and antidepressants, but not all of the agents in these broad categories are effective for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Treatment of bipolar depression: an update

This article attempts to summarize the current status of our knowledge and practice in the acute treatment and prophylaxis of bipolar depression. For prophylactic treatment, our knowledge about lithium firmly supports its usefulness against bipolar depression and its specific effectiveness for suicidal prevention. Valproic acid and carbamazepine could be effective, too, while lamotrigine which seems to be preferably effective against depression but not mania. The FDA has approved the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination and quetiapine monotherapy for the treatment of acute bipolar depression. The usefulness of antidepressants in bipolar depression is controversial both for acute and prophylactic treatment; guidelines suggest their cautious use and always in combination with an antimanic and mood stabilizer agent, because in some patients they may induce switching to mania or hypomania, mixed episodes and rapid cycling. Data on psychosocial intervention are restricted to the maintenance phase. Electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation are additional options for refractory patients. Bipolar depression seems to be a more difficult condition to treat than mania. Most patients need complex combination treatment although the published evidence on this type of treatment is limited.

Treatment of bipolar disorder: a complex treatment for a multi-faceted disorder

BACKGROUND

Manic-depression or bipolar disorder (BD) is a multi-faceted illness with an inevitably complex treatment.

METHODS

This article summarizes the current status of our knowledge and practice of its treatment.

RESULTS

It is widely accepted that lithium is moderately useful during all phases of bipolar illness and it might possess a specific effectiveness on suicidal prevention. Both first and second generation antipsychotics are widely used and the FDA has approved olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole for the treatment of acute mania. These could also be useful in the treatment of bipolar depression, but only limited data exists so far to support the use of quetiapine monotherapy or the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination. Some, but not all, anticonvulsants possess a broad spectrum of effectiveness, including mixed dysphoric and rapid-cycling forms. Lamotrigine may be effective in the treatment of depression but not mania. Antidepressant use is controversial. Guidelines suggest their cautious use in combination with an antimanic agent, because they are supposed to induce switching to mania or hypomania, mixed episodes and rapid cycling.

CONCLUSION

The first-line psychosocial intervention in BD is psychoeducation, followed by cognitive-behavioral therapy. Other treatment options include Electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation. There is a gap between the evidence base, which comes mostly from monotherapy trials, and clinical practice, where complex treatment regimens are the rule.

Do recent efficacy data on the drug treatment of acute bipolar depression support the position that drugs other than antidepressants are the treatment of choice? A conceptual review

This conceptual review summarises the results of relevant studies on antidepressants, mood stabilisers such as lithium and anticonvulsants, and second generation antipsychotics in the indication of bipolar depression. Based on methodological and clinical considerations, the position of antidepressants and the possible alternatives in this indication are reviewed very carefully. In addition the regulatory requirements for licensing a drug for the indication "short-term treatment of bipolar depression" are described.

Treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder: a critical review

INTRODUCTION

The development of treatment guidelines emerged as an important element so as to standardize treatment and to provide clinicians with algorithms, which would be able to carry research findings to the everyday clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The MEDLINE was searched with the combination of each one of the key words 'mania', 'manic', 'bipolar', 'manic-depression', 'manic-depressive' with 'treatment guidelines'.

RESULTS

The search was updated until March 1st, 2004 and returned 224 articles. Twenty-seven papers concerning the publication of treatment algorithms were traced.

DISCUSSION

Despite supposedly being evidence-based, guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder vary significantly across committees or working groups. Overall, however, at the first stage of the mania/hypomania algorithm, monotherapy with lithium, divalproex sodium or olanzapine is generally recommended. At latter stages combination therapy is strongly recommended. It is clearly stated that in bipolar depression antidepressants should be used only in combination with antimanic agents in order to avoid switching of phases. During the maintenance phase all patients should receive antimanic agents, while some may need the addition of antidepressants. The most recent guidelines emphasize the use of atypical antipsychotics for mania and lamotrigine for depression. The main problem with guidelines is that they are rapidly outdated and that the evidence base relies mainly on registration monotherapy trials that hardly reflect treatment in routine clinical conditions.

CONCLUSION

Treatment guidelines may be useful to avoid non-evidence-based treatment decisions, but they are quickly out-of-date and may not fully apply to the clinical setting. The more recent guidelines point the value of atypical antipsychotics, lithium, and valproate in the treatment of mania; the role of lithium, lamotrigine, and olanzapine as options for maintenance therapy; and the scarcity of options for the treatment of bipolar depression. Psychoeducation is also supported by most guidelines as an adjunctive treatment.

The Maudsley bipolar disorder project. A survey of psychotropic prescribing patterns in bipolar I disorder

OBJECTIVES

The outcome of Bipolar 1 Disorder (BD1) is greatly dependent on the adequacy and appropriateness of its treatment. As the treatment choices in BD1 disorder are increasing the aim of this study was to examine the current use of the pharmacological agents in BD1 patients and its association with clinical characteristics.

METHODS

Case note review of the pharmacotherapy of a sample of BD1 patients from a specified South London sector of a National Health Service Trust.

RESULTS

Half of the patients were on mood-stabilizers (usually lithium) and their use was associated with female gender and multiple admissions. Antipsychotics were more commonly used in patients with psychotic features and multiple manic episodes. Antidepressants were rarely prescribed alone and were not associated with increased number of manic episodes. Combination treatments were mostly used in patients in acute episodes and with multiple hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

In ordinary care, the treatment of BD1 is often driven by symptoms and falls short of the existing practice guidelines.

Are antidepressants less effective in the acute treatment of bipolar I compared to unipolar depression?

BACKGROUND

Using our routine documentation system we evaluated the hypothesis that antidepressants may be less effective in the acute treatment of bipolar I depressed patients compared to unipolar depressed patients.

METHOD

Based on the data from 2032 consecutively admitted inpatients with unipolar or bipolar I depression we compared the efficacy of antidepressants in both groups. The outcome was assessed by the Global assessment scale (GAS), the duration of hospitalisation and the Apathic-, Depressive- and Manic Syndrome subscales of the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry system.

RESULTS

Cohorts were comparable in treatment regimens and severity of depression at admission. At discharge, there were no statistically significant differences between bipolar I and unipolar depression for the outcome criteria Depressive Syndrome scale, GAS score and days in hospital. Bipolar patients showed a slightly decreased score of the Apathic Syndrome scale at discharge, also reflected by a slightly elevated score of the Manic Syndrome scale.

LIMITATIONS

This study did not check for differences in side effects such as switching or cycling commonly attributed to the use of tricyclic antidepressants in bipolar patients. Naturalistic data were obtained prospectively, analysis, however, was done retrospectively, thus limiting, but not completely excluding a possible selection bias.

CONCLUSION

Evaluating different outcome criteria, our naturalistic data of a large cohort seem to reject the hypothesis that antidepressants may be less effective in the acute treatment of bipolar I compared to unipolar depressed patients.

Subjective response to and tolerability of long-term supraphysiological doses of levothyroxine in refractory mood disorders

BACKGROUND

Although supplementation with supraphysiological doses of levothyroxine (T4) has been an effective treatment for refractory affective disorders in open studies, questions remain as to the tolerability of this treatment. This is the first study to investigate subjective patient response and tolerability to long-term treatment with adjunctive T4.

METHODS

Of 24 patients with refractory affective disorders or schizoaffective disorder who were consecutively included into an open trial with supraphysiological T4, 16 were eligible for this study. Four measures were used to rate tolerability to T4 treatment. Subjective response was graded on a scale ranging from -33 (maximal negative response) to +33 (maximal positive response). Positive and negative effects were assessed on a structured questionnaire. Clinical tolerance was assessed with the clinician-rated Thyroid Symptom List and the self-rated Von Zerssen Complaint Lists. Outcome was assessed with the CGI for prophylactic ratings (CGI-BP).

RESULTS

At the time of assessment, patients had been treated with supraphysiological T4 (mean dose 368 microg/d) for a mean of 54 months. The total subjective response score was +25.2. Positive subjective response and observer-rated treatment success were moderately correlated. Ratings on the Thyroid Symptom List indicated an overall favorable side effect profile. General physical and mental symptoms were only slightly higher than in the general population.

LIMITATIONS

This was an open, cross-sectional study that only included responders and partial responders to T4 treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective response and side-effect tolerability of long-term supraphysiological doses of T4 is favorable in patients with refractory mood and schizoaffective disorders who respond to the intervention.

Guidelines for treatment of bipolar disorder

Medication guidelines are being incorporated into psychiatric care, and may serve multiple functions, including ensuring consistent quality care, minimizing or managing costs, integration of new treatments, and providing clinicians with information necessary to make informed clinical decisions. Methods of guideline development and the published guidelines for the medication treatment of bipolar disorder are briefly reviewed. Despite limited research on the clinical efficacy of using guidelines, they serve other useful functions such as prioritizing multiple treatment options and providing a framework for treatment. The future role of treatment algorithms in psychiatric practice will be determined, in part, by results of studies evaluating the clinical impact of their use.