Comparison of the efficacy and endometrial safety of two estradiol valerate/dienogest combinations and Kliogest for continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

Progestogens for endometrial protection in combined menopausal hormone therapy: A systematic review

Menopausal women with an intact uterus choosing estrogens for menopausal symptom relief require a progestogen for endometrial protection. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the risks of endometrial hyperplasia resp. malignancy with different progestogens used in combined MHT. Overall, 84 RCTs were included. We found that 1) most studies were done with NETA, followed by MPA, MP and DYD and LNG, 2) most progestogens were only available as oral formulations, 3) the most frequently studied progestogens (oral MP, DYD, MPA, oral and transdermal NETA, transdermal LNG) were assessed in continuously as well as in sequentially combined MHT regimens, 4) FDA endometrial safety criteria were only fulfilled for some progestogen formulations, 5) most studies demonstrated endometrial protection for the progestogen dose and time period examined. However, 6) study quality varied which should be taken into account, when choosing a combined MHT, especially if off-label-use is chosen.

Effects of Dienogest on breasts of women of reproductive age and women in menopausal transition: A cohort study

Dienogest appears not to have any adverse breast effects on women of reproductive age.

Primary choice of estrogen and progestogen as components for HRT: a clinical pharmacological view

Prescribing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) requires consideration of the selection of its two components, the estrogen and the progestogen. In terms of the estrogen, the decision is mainly whether to use estradiol (E2) or conjugated equine estrogens (CEE). These are the components needed to efficiently treat climacteric symptoms or/and prevent osteoporosis, currently the only labeled indications. There is still controversy regarding the adequate dosages comparing E2 and CEE; however, the consensus is that the differences in the efficacy of E2 and CEE are not a real issue. Therefore, other criteria have to be used. The first reason to add the progestogen is to avoid the development of endometrial cancer (i.e. to achieve 'endometrial safety'). Any available 'fixed-combined' HRT preparation has to be tested for sufficient endometrial efficacy, because the first question the health authorities ask before product registration relates to endometrial safety. We can generally rely on the endometrial safety of these fixed-combined products. However, it could be that we want to use 'free' combinations, which are necessary if we use transdermal E2 (patches, gel, spray), but also to individualize schedules, for example when treating bleeding problems. The question here is how to attain knowledge about the endometrial efficacy of the different progestogens and how to monitor therapy. We will try to answer these two questions from a 'clinical pharmacology' point of view, as a discipline which preferably considers pharmacological properties, but also relating to clinical practice, to achieve individualized therapy with optimal efficacy, best tolerability and minimal risks.

Uterine bleeding with hormone therapies in menopausal women: a systematic review

Uterine bleeding is a common reason why women discontinue menopausal hormone therapy (HT). This systematic review compared bleeding profiles reported in studies for continuous-combined HT approved in North America and Europe for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women with a uterus. Non-head-to-head studies showed that uterine bleeding varies by formulation and administration route, with oral having a better bleeding profile than transdermal formulations. Cumulative amenorrhea over a year ranged from 18 to 61% with oral HT and from 9 to 27% with transdermal HT, as reported for continuous-combined HT containing 17β-estradiol (E2)/progesterone (P4) (56%), E2/norethisterone acetate (NETA) (49%), E2/drospirenone (45%), conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate (18-54%), ethinyl estradiol/NETA (31-61%), E2/levonorgestrel patch (16%), and E2/NETA patch (9-27%). Amenorrhea rates and the mean number of bleeding/spotting days improved over time. The oral E2/P4 combination was amongst those with lower bleeding rates and may be an appropriate alternative for millions of women seeking bioidentical HT and/or those who have bleeding concerns with other HT.

Choice of progestogen for endometrial protection in combination with transdermal estradiol in menopausal women

Transdermal estradiol (TE) application (using gels, patches or a novel spray) is now a preferred route of hormone therapy (HT) in menopausal women, because various risks such as venous thromboembolism, stroke and unwanted hepatic effects can be reduced compared with oral HT. However, in the presence of an intact uterus, concurrent administration of progestogen is needed for endometrial protection. Due to the variety of progestogens available and differences in their clinical effects, the selection of the most appropriate substance and dosing for individual combination therapy can be difficult. This is especially true for TE gels and the novel spray because no fixed combination products are commercially available, meaning all progestogens must be added separately, and even for patches only two transdermal synthetic progestogens are available. The aim of this review was to summarize data on the endometrial effects of the different progestogens and to provide practical recommendations for the choice of progestogen (type and dosing), with a focus on endometrial protection when using TE, especially when using the novel estradiol (E2) spray.

Antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid health benefits of COC containing newer progestogens: dienogest and drospirenone

Data have demonstrated that COCs, besides offering a satisfactory and safe contraception, offer a variety of non-contraceptive health benefits and therapeutic positive aspects. Many prescribes and users, however, do not realize these positive aspects especially the non-contraceptive health benefits. While the contraceptive use is the primary indication for COC use for most women, these users should be advised in regard of the non-contraceptive benefits when contraception is discussed and prescribed.

Using COCs specifically for non-contraceptive indications is an off-label use in many clinical situations (only some exceptions as e.g. acne vulgaris in some countries are allowed clinical entities for the use of these drugs). Therefore, appropriate discussions with the patient regarding this fact should performed and documented by the prescribing physicians.

Independent of the off-label situation, COCs containing the newer progestogens dienogest and drospirenone with their antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid health benefits play an important role in the management of many diseases and their use should therefore be considered by clinician’s.

This review will focus on the effects of these COCs on the endometrium, the skin, the fat tissue and the premenstrual syndrome.

Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women and risk of endometrial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Reduced circulating estrogen levels around the time of the menopause can induce unacceptable symptoms that affect the health and well-being of women. Hormone therapy (both unopposed estrogen and estrogen/progestogen combinations) is an effective treatment for these symptoms, but is associated with risk of harms. Guidelines recommend that hormone therapy be given at the lowest effective dose and treatment should be reviewed regularly. The aim of this review is to identify the minimum dose(s) of progestogen required to be added to estrogen so that the rate of endometrial hyperplasia is not increased compared to placebo.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess which hormone therapy regimens provide effective protection against the development of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (searched January 2012), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2012), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2012), EMBASE (1980 to January 2012), Current Contents (1993 to May 2008), Biological Abstracts (1969 to 2008), Social Sciences Index (1980 to May 2008), PsycINFO (1972 to January 2012) and CINAHL (1982 to May 2008). Attempts were made to identify trials from citation lists of reviews and studies retrieved, and drug companies were contacted for unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised comparisons of unopposed estrogen therapy, combined continuous estrogen-progestogen therapy, sequential estrogen-progestogen therapy with each other or placebo, administered over a minimum period of 12 months. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia/carcinoma assessed by a biopsy at the end of treatment was a required outcome. Data on adherence to therapy, rates of additional interventions, and withdrawals owing to adverse events were also extracted.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

In this update, 46 studies were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The small numbers of studies in each comparison and the clinical heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis for many outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Unopposed estrogen is associated with increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia at all doses, and durations of therapy between one and three years. For women with a uterus the risk of endometrial hyperplasia with hormone therapy comprising low-dose estrogen continuously combined with a minimum of 1 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) or 1.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is not significantly different from placebo at two years (1 mg NETA: OR 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0 to 2.8; 1.5 mg MPA: no hyperplasia events).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hormone therapy for postmenopausal women with an intact uterus should comprise both estrogen and progestogen to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia.

A one-year randomized double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the effects of an oestrogen-reduced, continuous combined hormone replacement therapy preparation containing 1 mg oestradiol valerate and 2 mg dienogest on metabolism in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of an oestrogen-reduced, continuous combined hormone replacement therapy preparation containing 1 mg oestradiol valerate (1EV) and 2 mg dienogest (2DNG) on metabolism.

METHODS

In a randomized double-blind study, 1EV/2DNG was compared with a reference preparation containing 1 mg 17Beta-oestradiol and 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate (E2/NETA). For the primary variable, i.e. the ratio of HDL cholesterol (week 52 to baseline), at least 98 case evaluations were planned. Secondary variables were other lipid parameters, haemostasis factors and carbohydrate metabolism.

RESULTS

After 1 year of treatment, the mean HDL cholesterol levels had decreased by 4.5 +/- 14.8% in the 1EV/2DNG group and by 6.1 +/- 13.9% in the E2/NETA group (treatment difference NS). The ratio of HDL cholesterol (week 52 to baseline) was 0.944 for 1EV/2DNG and 0.929 for E2/NETA (geometric means). The primary efficacy variable, the ratio of the geometric means of the two treatments (1EV/2DNG/E2/NETA) was 1.016, with a lower one-sided 95% confidence limit of 0.973, which was clearly above the prespecified non-inferiority bound of 0.85 (p-value < 0.001). HDL2 cholesterol increased by 0.3 +/- 34.4% (1EV/2DNG) and decreased by 6.2 +/- 34.3% (E2/NETA; treatment difference NS); HDL3 cholesterol decreased by 4.4 +/- 19.9% (1EV/2DNG) and 8.2 +/- 17.7% (E2/NETA; treatment difference NS). Changes in the haemostasis and carbohydrate variables were very similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that a new oestrogen-reduced HRT preparation containing 1 mg oestradiol valerate and 2 mg dienogest has no major impact on lipid variables. Minimal changes were seen in haemostatic and carbohydrate variables.

Estrogen treatment in multiple sclerosis

Currently available treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) reduce inflammatory lesions on MRI and decrease clinical relapses but have limited effects on disability. Novel treatment options that target both the inflammatory as well as the neurodegenerative component of the disease are therefore needed. A growing body of evidence from basic science and clinical studies supports the therapeutic potential of estrogens in MS. Mechanisms of action include both immunomodulatory and directly neuroprotective pathways. A first pilot trial of oral estriol treatment showed encouraging results. There are now several phase II trials underway to further determine the efficacy of estrogen treatment in MS.

Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women and risk of endometrial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Declining circulating estrogen levels around the time of the menopause can induce unacceptable symptoms that affect the health and well being of women. Hormone therapy (both unopposed estrogen and estrogen/progestogen combinations) is an effective treatment for these symptoms, but is associated with risk of harms. Guidelines recommend that hormone therapy be given at the lowest effective dose and treatment should be reviewed regularly. The aim of this review is to identify the minimum dose(s) of progestogen required to be added to estrogen so that the rate of endometrial hyperplasia is not increased compared to placebo.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess which hormone therapy regimens provide effective protection against the development of endometrial hyperplasia and/or carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (searched January 2008), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2008), EMBASE (1980 to May 2008), Current Contents (1993 to May 2008), Biological Abstracts (1969 to 2008), Social Sciences Index (1980 to May 2008), PsycINFO (1972 to May 2008) and CINAHL (1982 to May 2008). Attempts were made to identify trials from citation lists of reviews and studies retrieved, and drug companies were contacted for unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised comparisons of unopposed estrogen therapy, combined continuous estrogen-progestogen therapy and/or sequential estrogen-progestogen therapy with each other or placebo, administered over a minimum period of twelve months. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia/carcinoma assessed by a biopsy at the end of treatment was a required outcome. Data on adherence to therapy, rates of additional interventions, and withdrawals due to adverse events were also extracted.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

In this substantive update, forty five studies were included. Odds ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The small numbers of studies in each comparison and the clinical heterogeneity precluded meta analysis for many outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Unopposed estrogen is associated with increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia at all doses, and durations of therapy between one and three years. For women with a uterus the risk of endometrial hyperplasia with hormone therapy comprising low dose estrogen continuously combined with a minimum of 1 mg norethisterone acetate or 1.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate is not significantly different from placebo (1mg NETA: OR=0.04 (0 to 2.8); 1.5mg MPA: no hyperplasia events).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hormone therapy for postmenopausal women with an intact uterus should comprise both estrogen and progestogen to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia.

Expression of estrogen and progesterone receptor genes in endometrium, myometrium and vagina of postmenopausal women treated with estriol

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Estriol is an estrogen with considerably weaker stimulatory effects on endometrial proliferation than estradiol. A study was conducted to determine the level of estrogen receptors (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PRs) in women who received 14-day vaginal estriol therapy, compared with those who did not receive this therapy. ER and PR gene expression was analyzed in the endometrium, myometrium and vagina of postmenopausal women treated with estriol.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Analytical cross-sectional study, at the Research Institute of the Polish Mothers' Memorial Hospital, Lodz, Poland.

METHODS

Twenty-seven postmenopausal women (57-74 years of age) were included in the study. All of them were waiting for per vaginam hysterectomy or plastic surgery on the vagina and perineum because of uterine prolapse. ER and PR gene expression was determined by means of the technique of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

In the estriol-treated patients, in comparison with the control group, a significant increase in ER gene expression was observed in the endometrium and vagina, while enhanced PR gene expression was found in the endometrium. However, under histological examination of the endometrium, estrogen stimulation of low and medium degree was diagnosed for 21.4% and 14.3% of the estriol-treated women, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained suggest that the women who received 14 days of treatment with vaginal estriol had higher ER and PR mRNA levels. No difference between these groups regarding endometrial proliferation was observed.

A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy of a continuous-combined hormone therapy preparation containing 1mg estradiol valerate/2mg dienogest on hot flushes in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of an estrogen-reduced, continuous-combined hormone therapy preparation (HT) containing 1mg estradiol valerate (1EV) and 2mg dienogest (2DNG) on the number of moderate and severe hot flushes.

METHODS

This study compared the effects of an oral continuous-combined HT containing 1mg EV and 2mg DNG (1EV/2DNG) with those of placebo. The planned treatment duration was 12 weeks. Data were obtained from 324 postmenopausal women. The primary efficacy variable was the individual relative change of the mean number of moderate and severe hot flushes per week. Weeks 5-12 of treatment were compared with the 2 weeks preceding the treatment phase.

RESULTS

Moderate and severe hot flushes were reduced by 80.8+/-30.9% in the 1EV/2DNG group and by 41.5+/-39.4% in the placebo group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001; Wilcoxon's rank sum test). The incidence of all types of hot flushes (mild+moderate+severe) was reduced by 75.2+/-30.2% under 1EV/2DNG and by 35.3+/-37.0% under placebo. In the subset of non-hysterectomized women, exposure to 1EV/2DNG led to 2.4+/-6.2 days with bleeding in the reference period of 84 days of treatment, versus 0.3+/-1.3 days in the placebo group. The safety profile of 1EV/2DNG was very similar to that of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous-combined HT preparation with 1mg EV and 2mg DNG induced a significant reduction of moderate and severe hot flushes compared to placebo (p<0.0001). Thus, this low-estrogen preparation is an effective and safe option for HT.

Bioidentical Hormone Therapy: A Review of the Evidence

Bioidentical hormone therapy (BHT) uses bioidentical hormones (BHs), derivatives of plant extracts chemically modified to be structurally indistinguishable from human endogenous hormones. BHTs are available commercially or can be compounded into different dosages and for different routes of administration. Typically, compounded preparations of BHs may include estriol, estrone, estradiol, testosterone, micronized progesterone, and occasionally dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). It is generally accepted that estrogen-based hormone therapies share similar efficacies as well as risks. Many FDA-approved and regulated pharmaceutically manufactured and branded conventional hormone therapies (CHTs) employ BHs. Since the publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial results publicizing an increased risk of stroke, venous thrombosis, and breast cancer and no beneficial effect on coronary heart disease (CHD), use of CHT has declined, and there has been increased interest in alternative approaches. This review of the literature related to compounded BHT and the practices of its advocates is to determine if sufficient scientific evidence supports claims of greater efficacy and safety and any additional risks and uncertainties not generally associated with CHTs. Compounded BHTs have been promoted by some as natural, safer, and in some cases more efficacious than conventional hormone therapies, but there is a dearth of scientific evidence to support these claims. Compounded BHTs lack well controlled studies examining route of administration, pharmacokinetics, safety, and a critical, science-based rationale for the mixture and ratios of bioidentical estrogens employed in many preparations. Many advocates of compounded BHTs customize prescriptions based on saliva tests or blood sera levels in direct contradiction to evidence-based guidelines, which support tailoring HT individually according to symptoms. Currently, scientific uncertainties associated with compounded BHTs make their use less preferable to that of CHTs, as CHTs have been and continue to be assessed by clinical trials regarding both benefits and risks and are indicated for use according to evidence-based guidelines.

Identifying target regions for vigilance improvement under hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal syndrome patients by means of electroencephalographic tomography (LORETA)

RATIONALE

Daytime fatigue, which at the neurophysiological level is due to vigilance decrements, is a frequent complaint in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES

In a three-arm, 2-month, parallel group-design study, vigilance-promoting effects of a novel continuous combination (=Climodien 2/3) of estradiol valerate (EV; 2 mg) and dienogest (DNG; 3 mg) were compared with the effects of both EV alone and placebo in 55 insomniac, postmenopausal syndrome patients.

METHODS

Low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) was undertaken to identify the cerebral target regions of hormone replacement therapy.

RESULTS

An omnibus significance test revealed Climodien to increase activity in 882 of 2,394 voxels in the alpha-2 band, followed by 733, 706, and 664 voxels in the beta-2, beta-1, and beta-3 bands, and 509 voxels in the delta band, whereas 2 mg EV alone did not produce a significant suprathreshold activity. Current density increased predominantly in the right hemisphere, which had already been described in the literature as the center of the vigilance system. In the fast alpha range, which plays a major role in the context of vigilance, increased activity was found in the right prefrontal, temporal, and superior parietal cortices, i.e., those brain areas of the right-sided fronto-parietal neuronal network that are responsible for sustained attention. A further activity increase was seen in the anterior cingulate gyrus associated with attentional control and conflict monitoring. The right temporal lobe showed increased current density in all frequency bands.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroencephalographic tomography (LORETA) identified the right-hemispheric vigilance system as the target region of Climodien.

Role of progestins with partial antiandrogenic effects

An experts' meeting on the 'Role of progestins with partial antiandrogenic effects' was held in Berlin from January 19 to 22, 2001. The meeting was chaired by Dr R. Sitruk-Ware (New York, USA) and participants included Ms F. Fruzzetti (Pisa, Italy), J. Hanker (Trier, Germany), J. Huber (Vienna, Austria), F. Husmann (Bad Sassendorf, Germany), S. O. Skouby (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. H. H. Thijssen (Utrecht, The Netherlands), and R. Druckmann (Nice, France). The present paper reports the conclusions of the meeting. However, the publication of the Women's Health Initiative study, which appeared after the meeting, led to additional comments and revisions.

Mammographic breast density, hormones, and growth factors during continuous combined hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect on mammographic breast density of two different continuous combined regimens for hormone therapy.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Postmenopausal women without any previous history of breast disorder.

INTERVENTION(S)

The women received either estradiol valerate/dienogest or estradiol/norethisterone acetate. Mammograms and venous blood samples were obtained at baseline and after 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Change in mammographic breast density. Correlations with levels of hormones, growth factors, and binding proteins.

RESULT(S)

An increase in mammographic density was recorded in approximately 50% of the women, and there were no differences between treatments. Increased density showed a positive correlation with estradiol, estrone, and sex hormone-binding globulin and showed a negative association to free T. Among hormonal factors, levels of free T were the most important for predicting increased density.

CONCLUSION(S)

Continuous combined hormone therapy with different progestogens has a marked impact on the breast.

Bioidentical hormone therapy: a review

OBJECTIVE

The terms "natural" or "bioidentical" hormone therapy (NHT) are used to describe hormone treatment with individually compounded recipes of certain steroids in various dosage forms, including dehydroepiandrosterone, pregnenolone, testosterone, progesterone, estrone, estradiol, and estriol. Based on the results of a person's salivary hormone levels, the final composition of the compounded dosage form is individualized to that specific person. Proponents claim that NHT is better tolerated than manufactured products. This paper is intended to review the concept of NHT and to determine whether there is sufficient scientific evidence to support its use.

DESIGN

A literature search was performed in Medline using the following MeSH terms and key words: drug combinations; progestational hormones; hormone replacement therapy; endometrium; estrogen replacement therapy; climacteric; menopause; estradiol; estrogens; progesterone; drug monitoring; and drug compounding. Current Contents, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Lexis Nexis, Google, Medscape, MD Consult, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched with key words.

RESULTS

There are a few observational studies and clinical trials comparing conventional hormone therapy with bioidentical hormone therapy. Studies generally lacked adequate study design, including small sample sizes and comparison of inequivalent doses, to prove safety and efficacy. Little evidence was found to support individualized hormone dosing based upon saliva hormone concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that, although individualized hormonal products may decrease some symptoms of menopause, it seems they have no proven advantage over conventional hormone therapies and their use is not supported by evidence regarding pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy.

Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: endometrial hyperplasia and irregular bleeding

BACKGROUND

The decline in circulating oestrogen around the time of the menopause often induces unacceptable symptoms that affect the health and well being of women. Hormone replacement therapy (both unopposed oestrogen and oestrogen and progestogen combinations) is an effective treatment for these symptoms. In women with an intact uterus, unopposed oestrogen may induce endometrial stimulation and increase the risk of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. The addition of progestogen reduces this risk but may cause unacceptable symptoms, bleeding and spotting which can affect adherence to therapy.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess which hormone replacement therapy regimens provide effective protection against the development of endometrial hyperplasia and/or carcinoma with a low rate of abnormal vaginal bleeding.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (searched January 2003), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2003), EMBASE (1980 to January 2003), Current Contents (1993 to January 2003), Biological Abstracts (1969 to 2002), Social Sciences Index (1980 to January 2003), PsycINFO (1972 to February 2003) and CINAHL (1982 to January 2003). The search strategy was developed by the Cochrane Menstrual Disorder and Subfertility Group. Attempts were also made to identify trials from citation lists of review articles and drug companies were contacted for unpublished data. In most cases, the corresponding author of each included trial was contacted for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of unopposed oestrogen therapy, combined continuous oestrogen-progestogen therapy and sequential oestrogen-progestogen therapy with each other and placebo administered over a minimum treatment period of six months. Trials had to assess which regimen was the most protective against the development of endometrial hyperplasia/carcinoma and/or caused the lowest rate of irregular bleeding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Sixty RCTs were identified. Of these 23 were excluded and seven remain awaiting assessment. The reviewers assessed the thirty included studies for quality, extracted the data independently and odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes were estimated. Outcomes analysed included frequency of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma, frequency of irregular bleeding and unscheduled biopsies or dilation and curettage, and adherence to therapy.

MAIN RESULTS

Unopposed moderate or high dose oestrogen therapy when compared to placebo was associated with a significant increase in rates of endometrial hyperplasia with increasing rates at longer duration of treatment and follow up. Odds ratios ranged from (1 RCT; OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 20.9) for 6 months of treatment to (4 RCTs; OR 9.6, 95% CI 5.9 to 15.5) for 24 months treatment and (1 RCT; OR 15.0, 95% CI 9.3 to 27.5) for 36 months of treatment with moderate dose oestrogen (in the PEPI trial, 62% of those who took moderate dose oestrogen had some form of hyperplasia at 36 months compared to 2% of those who took placebo). Irregular bleeding and non adherence to treatment were also significantly more likely under these unopposed oestrogen regimens that increased bleeding with higher dose therapy. Although not statistically significant, there was a 3% incidence (2 RCTs) of hyperplasia in women who took low dose oestrogen compared to no incidence of hyperplasia in the placebo group. The addition of progestogens, either in continuous combined or sequential regimens, helped to reduce the risk of endometrial hyperplasia and improved adherence to therapy. At longer duration of treatment, continuous therapy was more effective than sequential therapy in reducing the risk of endometrial hyperplasia. There was evidence of a higher incidence of hyperplasia under long cycle sequential therapy (progestogen given every three months) compared to monthly sequential therapy (progestogen given every month). No increase in endometrial cancer was seen in any of t in any of the treatment groups during the duration (maximum of six years) of these trials. During the first year of therapy irregular bleeding and spotting was more likely in continuous combined therapy than sequential therapy. However, during the second year of therapy bleeding and spotting was more likely under sequential regimens.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is strong and consistent evidence in this review that unopposed oestrogen therapy, at moderate and high doses, is associated with increased rates of endometrial hyperplasia, irregular bleeding and consequent non adherence to therapy. The addition of oral progestogens administered either sequentially or continuously is associated with reduced rates of hyperplasia and improved adherence to therapy. Irregular bleeding is less likely under sequential than continuous therapy during the first year of therapy but there is a suggestion that continuous therapy over long duration is more protective than sequential therapy in the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia. Hyperplasia is more likely when progestogen is given every three months in a sequential regimen compared to a monthly progestogen sequential regimen.

Androgens and Antiandrogens

The role of androgens in women's health has been generally neglected. Currently available assays are lacking in sensitivity and reliability at the lower ranges. Circulating androgens as prohormones for other steroids (e.g., androgens) have an ubiquitous role on diverse physiological and behavioral systems. Clinical assessment of both androgen production and androgen availability can be achieved by measurement of two or three essential values. These include either total T and sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG), free T and SHBG, or free T and total T. The free testosterone index (total T/SHBG) correlates well with free or bioavailable T and can be used as a substitute. DHEA-S is the most useful measure of adrenal androgen production in women. Androgen insufficiency in women is not a specific consequence of natural menopause, but may occur secondarily to the age-related decline in both adrenal and ovarian androgen production. Since estrogen effects are also strongly linked to mood, psychological well-being, and sexual function in women, the diagnosis of androgen insufficiency should only be made in women who are adequately estrogenized. Before initiating a trial of androgen replacement therapy, a comprehensive clinical assessment should be performed in all cases. Approved androgen replacement therapy is not yet available in most countries for treatment of female sexual dysfunction. This would include T supplements or DHEA. Several new progestins have been synthesized in the last decade. Dienogest is a hybrid progestin that is derived from both the pregnane and the estrane groups with a 17alpha-cyanomethyl radical; drospirenone is derived from spirolactone. Somehow, the molecules available have demonstrated antiandrogenic properties. Cyproterone acetate (CPA) is the most potent antiandrogenic progestin, followed by dienogest, drosperinone, and chlormadinone acetate. Nomegestrol acetate and medrogestone also exert some antiandrogenic properties and are similar to chlormadinone acetate in antiandrogenic potency. While androgens act positively on libido in women, antiandrogenic properties in doses used in HRT do not appear to have a negative effect. Progestins used in HRT have varying pharmacological properties that are associated with different adverse effects. The new progestins with antiandrogenic properties avoid many of the androgenic side effects related to testosterone-derived progestins. They also have the potential of not counteracting beneficial estrogen effects, for example, on the cardiovascular system or mental tone.

Effects of hormone replacement therapy on perceptual and cognitive event-related potentials in menopausal insomnia

The influence of a combined estrogen-progestin regimen (Climodien, Lafamme) on auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative, randomized 3-arm trial phase (Climodien 2/3=estradiol valerate 2 mg+the progestin dienogest 3 mg, EV=estradiol valerate 2 mg, and placebo), followed by an open-label phase in which all patients received Climodien 2/2 (estradiol valerate 2 mg+dienogest 2 mg). Both the double-blind and the open-label phase lasted 2 months. ERPs were recorded from 19 EEG leads in a two-tone odd-ball paradigm in 49 patients aged between 46 and 67 yr with the diagnosis of insomnia (G 47.0) related to postmenopausal syndrome (N 95.1). Climodien reduced standard N1 and target P300 latencies as compared to placebo, while EV did not affect N1 latency but similarly reduced P300 latency. Climodien increased N1, P2 and P300 amplitudes dose-dependently, predominantly at frontal leads. Estrogen alone had only minor effects on ERP amplitudes. The shortening of standard N1 latency and enhancement of N1 and P2 amplitudes indicates a positive effect of Climodien on perceptual processing, most likely due to vigilance improvements also observed in EEG mapping. Concerning target P300, it seems that estradiol is responsible for the improvement in stimulus evaluation time, as reflected by the shortening of the peak latency, while dienogest seems to account for the improvement in cognitive information processing capacity, whereby 3 mg induced a more pronounced augmentation of P300 amplitudes than 2 mg. Based on the spatial distribution of this increase, it can be speculated that Climodien mainly affects the more frontally distributed P3a subcomponent, which is associated with attention and orientation. Furthermore, the observed changes in ERP-components are consistent with recent studies showing significant positive effects of hormone replacement therapy on cholinergic functions. Thus, Climodien seems to be of interest in preventing cognitive decline and treating cognitive disorders in postmenopausal women. Indeed, there is increasing evidence of beneficial effects of estrogen in dementia. Our present findings suggest that the estrogen effects may be augmented by dienogest.

Breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women during HRT evaluated through fine needle aspiration cytology

The basis of breast cancer risk associated with hormonal therapies may lie in the regulation of cell proliferation. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study postmenopausal women were given continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) either as estradiol valerate 2 mg/dienogest 2 mg, (E2V/DNG) or estradiol 2 mg/noretisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA) for 6 months. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies were used for immunocytochemical analysis of breast cell proliferation before and during treatment. From 45 women completing the study 135 biopsies were obtained. In the total material there was a more than 4-fold increase in proliferation between baseline and 3 months (p < 0.001). The mean percentage of MIB-1 positive breast cells increased from 2.2 to 9.1%. In some individual women values were as high as 25%. No further increase was recorded at 6 months. While numerical values were somewhat lower in the E2V/DNG group, there were no significant differences between treatments. There was a positive correlation between breast cell proliferation (MIB-1%) and circulating levels of both estradiol (r(s) = 0.54, p < 0.01) and estrone (r(s) = 0.53, p < 0.01) after 3 and 6 months of treatment. No correlations with other endogenous hormones, proteins or with the two exogenous progestogens dienogest and norethisterone were observed. Increased breast cell proliferation should probably be regarded as an unwanted side-effect during HRT. Means to identify those women with the most pronounced proliferative response should be developed. The FNA biopsy technique may be a useful tool to monitor and evaluate the proliferative response to HRT in the normal breasts of postmenopausal women.

Comparison of the difference in histopathology and cell cycle kinetics among the postmenopausal endometrium treated with different progestins in sequential-combined hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the difference in histopathology and cell cycle kinetics in the menopausal endometrium treated with sequential-combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) using different types and doses of progestins.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, 1-year study was conducted. In a menopause clinic of a university hospital, 241 postmenopausal women using HRT were included for the study of histopathology and cell cycle analysis. Conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625mg/day, were administered for 25 days (days 1-25) of each month, and the following were also administered for 14 days (days 12-25): in group A ( n= 102), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 5 mg/day; in group B ( n= 66), MPA, 10mg/day; and in group C ( n= 73), dydrogesterone, 20mg/day. Endometrial sampling was performed after at least 10 months of treatment. Fifty-two premenopausal women were also enrolled for the comparative studies (group Y). The S-G2-M fractions in the cell cycle were used as the marker of proliferation.

RESULTS

Most menopausal endometria were normal regardless of the regimens of HRT. Endometrial hyperplasia was only found in two cases (both in group A). The S-G2-M fractions of the endometrial cells in all three menopausal groups showed no statistically significant difference. It appeared that S-G2-M fractions increased from normal postmenopausal to normal premenopausal endometria to postmenopausal hyperplasia to premenopausal hyperplasia. The S-G2-M fractions of the normal menopausal endometrial cells were lower than those of the premenopausal controls either in normal or in hyperplastic categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that there is no difference between the effect of MPA and dydrogesterone used in sequential-combined HRT based on the cycle kinetics of the menopausal endometrium.

Hormone replacement therapy and vigilance: double-blind, placebo-controlled EEG-mapping studies with an estrogen-progestogen combination (Climodien, Lafamme) versus estrogen alone in menopausal syndrome patients

The aim of the double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate the effects of a continuous combined estrogen-progestogen treatment (Climodien, Lafamme) as compared with estrogen alone on vigilance in insomniac postmenopausal syndrome patients, objectified by EEG mapping.

METHODS

In a 3-arm, 2-month parallel group design phase, patients received a combination of estradiol valerate 2 mg and the novel progestogen dienogest 3 mg (Climodien 2/3) or estradiol valerate 2 mg alone or placebo. In a subsequent open-label phase, all patients received estradiol valerate 2 mg+dienogest 2 mg (Climodien 2/2). EEG mapping was carried out before and after the 2-month double-blind phase as well as after the 2-month open-label treatment.

RESULTS

As compared with placebo, Climodien 2/3 induced a marked and highly significant increase in absolute power in all frequency bands, specifically in alpha-2 activity. Moreover, a significant increase in relative alpha-2 power, a decrease in relative delta and beta power as well as an acceleration of the dominant frequency and of the delta and alpha centroids suggested a marked improvement in vigilance. In contrast, under estradiol valerate 2 mg alone, only a slight augmentation of alpha and attenuation of relative delta and beta power occurred, suggesting only a slight vigilance improvement as compared with placebo. Thus, dienogest 2 mg increased the estrogen effect, which was also confirmed by a statistical evaluation of the differences between Climodien 2/3 and estradiol valerate alone (augmentation of alpha-2, attenuation of relative beta, acceleration of the dominant frequency). Moreover, Climodien 2/2 also markedly increased alpha-2 power, decreased relative beta-2 power and accelerated the alpha centroid. Finally, comparing Climodien 2/3 with Climodien 2/2, there was even a dose-efficacy relation.

CONCLUSIONS

Estradiol valerate 2 mg improves vigilance slightly, thereby confirming previous findings. The additional administration of dienogest does not minimize the effect of estrogen, but on the contrary increases it, which makes the combination superior to both placebo and estradiol valerate alone. Vigilance improvement may be of great therapeutic benefit to menopausal syndrome patients at a time when increased adaptability is needed to adjust to increasing sexual, marital, occupational and social difficulties known to occur specifically in this period of life.

Estradiol valerate/dienogest

Estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 2mg is an oral estrogen/ progestogen formulation that has been approved throughout the European Union for the treatment of climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women. Dienogest is a progestogen that combines the properties of both progesterone and 19-nortestosterone derivatives. It has moderate affinity for the progesterone receptor, significant antiproliferative and antiandrogenic activity, and produces secretory transformation of the endometrium. Estradiol valerate is an esterified form of natural 17beta-estradiol, the most potent endogenous human ovarian estrogen, and is hydrolysed to estradiol soon after oral administration. Results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial showed that oral estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 2mg and estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 3mg once daily for 1 year were each as effective as estradiol 2mg/estriol 1mg/norethisterone acetate 1mg in the treatment of climacteric symptoms in 581 postmenopausal women; reductions from baseline in Kupperman Index scores were 78.5, 74.5 and 75.0%, respectively. The number of days without any type of bleeding was lowest in patients treated with estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 2mg (8.7 days), and highest in the estradiol valerate 2mg/ dienogest 3mg group (12.1 days). During the twelfth month of treatment with estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 2mg, the percentage of patients who reported bleeding was 14.5%. Endometrial biopsy results were similar in patients treated with estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 2mg, estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 3mg or estradiol 2mg/estriol 1mg/norethisterone acetate 1mg once daily for 1 year; 90.8, 87.4 and 87.5% of samples, respectively, contained atrophic material. Proliferative material was found in 4.2, 2.5 and 4.4% of the biopsies, respectively; there was no incidence of hyperplasia in any of the treatment groups. A noncomparative multicentre study in 1501 postmenopausal women demonstrated that adverse events associated with estradiol valerate 2mg/dienogest 2mg once daily for 48 weeks included breakthrough bleeding, mastalgia, headache, abdominal pain, hypertension, thrush, migraine, weight gain, increase in endometrial thickness and metrorrhagia.