Verbal Instruction Model (VIM) in voice therapy

Voice Therapy Outcome: A Comparison Between Imitation Model Voice Therapy and Verbal Instructions Model Voice Therapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to compare voice outcomes over time in patients treated with Imitation Model voice therapy and Verbal Instructions Model voice therapy.

METHODS

A prospective clinical trial was performed with 56 consecutive patients diagnosed with a primary or secondary functional voice disorder. Thirty-one patients were included for voice therapy following the Imitation Model and 25 patients for the Verbal Instructions Model. Assessments included a self-rated Voice Handicap Index, self-perceived hoarseness and vocal fatigue, perceptual voice evaluation by a Speech Language Pathologist, and maximum Voice Range Profiles. All assessments were completed before therapy, at end of therapy, at six-months posttherapy follow-up and 12-months posttherapy follow-up. For maximum Voice Range Profiles group differences were also compared for effects from end-of-treatment to follow-up assessments. Linear mixed models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Comparison between treatment groups showed significantly larger long-term improvement from the baseline, for verbal instructions model as compared to imitation model for Voice Handicap Index total, and also the physical and emotional subscales, while there was no difference between groups for the functional subscale. Also, voice quality improved more after verbal instructions model, as compared to imitation model, at end of therapy. Results from self-rated hoarseness and vocal fatigue showed no difference between groups. There was no difference between treatment groups in the change of maximum Voice Range Profile from end-of-treatment to follow-up assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that both Imitation Model voice therapy and Verbal Instructions Model voice therapy improved voice function. Compared to Imitation Model, the Verbal Instructions model showed larger long-term effect on physical and emotional aspects of voice function in everyday life. The two approaches for voice therapy might have different impacts on patients' learning.

The Influence of Multisensory Input On Voice Perception and Production Using Immersive Virtual Reality

OBJECTIVES

The purpose was to examine the influence of auditory vs visual vs combined audiovisual input on perception and production of one's own voice, using immersive virtual reality technology.

METHODS

Thirty-one vocally healthy men and women were investigated under 18 sensory input conditions, using immersive virtual reality technology. Conditions included two auditory rooms with varying reverberation times, two visual rooms with varying volumes, and the combination of audiovisual conditions. All conditions were repeated with and without background noise. Speech tasks included counting, sustained vowel phonation, an all-voiced sentence from the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice, and the first sentence from the Rainbow Passage, randomly ordered. Perception outcome measures were participants' self-reported perceptions of their vocal loudness, vocal effort, and vocal comfort in speech. Production outcome measures were sound pressure level (SPL) and spectral moments (spectral mean and standard deviation in Hz, skewness, and kurtosis). Statistical analyses used self-reported vocal effort, vocal loudness, and vocal comfort in percent (0 = "not at all," 100 = extremely), SPL in dB, and spectral moments in Hz. The reference level was a baseline audiovisual deprivation condition.

RESULTS

Results suggested (i) increased self-perceived vocal loudness and effort, and decreased comfort, with increasing room volume, speaker-to-listener distance, audiovisual input, and background noise, and (ii) increased SPL and fluctuations in spectral moments across conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only auditory, but also visual and audiovisual input influenced voice perception and production in ways that have not been previously documented. Findings contribute to the basic science understanding the role of visual, audiovisual and auditory input in voice perception and production, and also to models of voice training and therapy. The findings also set the foundation for the use of virtual reality in voice and speech training, as a potentially power solution to the generalization problem.

Clinician and Patient Perception of a Voice Therapy Program Utilizing a Variably Occluded Face Mask: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to assess clinician and patient feedback about voice therapy using a variably occluded face mask (VOFM) and to determine if voice therapy augmented via a VOFM would result in favorable changes in patient self-perceived handicap, as well as acoustic and aerodynamic measures.

METHODS/DESIGN

This pilot study used a prospective, pre-post single group design. Eleven patients with dysphonia due to primary muscle tension dysphonia (8) or benign vocal fold lesions (3) were recruited. Data collected included patient and clinician feedback of voice therapy using a VOFM, voice handicap index (VHI)-10, acoustic and aerodynamic measures. Data were collected before treatment (baseline) and 1-week post-therapy. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare data pre- and post-therapy.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvement was observed for the VHI-10 with a median delta of -7. Clinician feedback generally reported that patients liked the VOFM, using the VOFM within the first two sessions of therapy, and within less than 10 min of use. All clinicians ranked the conversation level of the hierarchy as the most effective level. Three themes emerged from the Therapy Feedback Form: the VOFM was a (1) "Facilitator for Sensation," (2) a "Physical Tool," and that there was (3) "No Program Needed" to use the VOFM in voice therapy. There was a statistically significant improvement in cepstral peak prominence (p = 0.0329) and cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (p = 0.0164) in sustained vowels.

DISCUSSION

This pilot study represents the first investigation into clinician and patient perceptions of using a VOFM. Reported measures via patient perception, as well as clinician perceptions, and some acoustic and aerodynamic measures showed that participants got better with VOFM voice therapy. Last, in general, both clinicians and patients liked utilizing a VOFM in voice therapy.

Conversation Training Therapy: Let's Talk It Through

This article introduces a novel approach to voice therapy called conversation training therapy (CTT). CTT is the first voice therapy approach to remove the therapeutic hierarchy common in most treatment programs. Rather, CTT uses patient-driven conversation as the sole stimuli in therapy to increase perceptual awareness of voice production in conversational speech. The genesis as to why CTT was developed, as well as the conceptual, theoretical, and component parts of CTT, will be explained. In addition, this article will offer examples of the language of therapy, as it applies to CTT and how to trouble-shoot if problems arise. Medical documentation relevant to CTT will also be outlined. Last, results from a recent efficacy study on CTT will be reported.

Efficacy of Conversation Training Therapy for Patients With Benign Vocal Fold Lesions and Muscle Tension Dysphonia Compared to Historical Matched Control Patients

Purpose Conversation training therapy (CTT) is the 1st voice therapy approach to eliminate the traditional therapeutic hierarchy and use patient-driven conversation as the sole therapeutic stimulus. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of CTT compared to standard-of-care voice therapy approaches for the treatment of patients with voice disorders. Method A prospective study of CTT treatment outcomes in adults with dysphonia due to primary muscle tension dysphonia or benign vocal fold lesions compared to age, gender, and diagnosis historical matched control (HMC) patients was used. The primary outcome was change in Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10); secondary outcomes included acoustic, aerodynamic, and auditory-perceptual outcomes. Data were collected before treatment (baseline), at the start of each therapy session, 1 week after the final therapy session (short-term follow-up), and 3 months after the final therapy session (long-term follow-up). Results For the CTT group, statistically significant improvements were observed for VHI-10. Though statistically significant improvements were observed for the VHI-10 for the HMC group, the CTT group saw significantly greater improvement in VHI-10. Furthermore, equivalent gains were observed following only 2 sessions of CTT compared to 4-8 sessions of traditional therapy. Significant improvements in the CTT group were observed for cepstral peak prominence in a vowel, fundamental frequency, Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia in a vowel and connected speech, vocal intensity, average airflow in speech in a reading passage, number of breaths and duration of reading passage, and auditory-perceptual measurement of overall voice severity. Conclusions Results support the hypothesis that training voice techniques in the context of spontaneous conversational speech improves patient perception of voice handicap and acoustic, aerodynamic, and auditory-perceptual voice outcomes both immediately following treatment and at long-term follow-up. CTT participants also demonstrated significantly larger decreases in VHI-10 compared to HMC participants who received standard-of-care, nonconversational, hierarchical-based voice therapy.