Safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: postmarketing surveillance report of 7740 patients

Six-month safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the real-world safety/effectiveness of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in patients with RA in Japan registered in a post-marketing surveillance study.

METHODS

This interim analysis included data from July 2013 to December 2018. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)/Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)/Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-4(ESR)] scores, and rates of SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR)-defined remission and low disease activity were analysed using 6 months of data. Risk factors for serious infections were assessed by multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Safety and disease activity were evaluated in 6866 and 6649 patients, respectively. Overall, 32.73%/7.37% of patients reported AEs/SAEs. Clinically important AEs with tofacitinib included serious infections/infestations [3.13% of patients; incidence rate (IR; patients with events) 6.91/100 patient-years (PY)], herpes zoster (3.63%; IR 8.02/100 PY), and malignancies (0.68%; IR 1.45/100 PY). SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR) scores and remission/low disease activity rates improved over 6 months. Male sex, older age, Steinbrocker's stage IV, history of infection, and diabetes mellitus at baseline were independent risk factors for serious infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RA receiving tofacitinib in Japan, safety was consistent with the reported profile, and disease activity improved over 6 months.

STUDY IDENTIFIER

NCT01932372.

Adalimumab exhibits superiority over etanercept in terms of a numerically higher response rate and equivalent adverse events: A real-world finding

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETN) are the most commonly applied biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in China; however, the evidence regarding their superiority is controversial. In addition, in real-world clinical settings, many factors may affect the application of these agents, such as dosage and administration period. Therefore, the present real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and ETN treatment in RA patients via the propensity score matching method.

METHODS

In total, 105 RA patients receiving ADA (n = 66) or ETN (n = 39) were reviewed in this retrospective study. The propensity score matching method was used to eliminate discrepancies in baseline features. Clinical response, low disease activity (LDA), and remission were evaluated based on the DAS28.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA yielded higher rates of clinical response at W24 (97.0% vs. 84.6%, p = .021), LDA at W12 (78.8% vs. 51.3%, p = .003), and remission at W24 (75.8% vs. 46.2%, p = .002). After propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA only achieved a higher rate of clinical response at W24 (96.3% vs. 77.8%, p = .043), whereas the rates of LDA and remission were not different between ADA and ETN treatments at any time point (all p > .05). In addition, the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the ADA and ETN treatments (all p > .05).

CONCLUSION

ADA shows superiority over ETN in terms of a numerically greater response rate and equivalent adverse events.

Incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with different molecular-targeted drugs: A population-based retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We compared the incidences of four opportunistic infections (OIs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with molecular-targeted drugs from big claims data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 205,906 patients with RA who were prescribed molecular-targeted drugs in 2010-17 from the National Database of Japan and calculated the incidence of four OIs (Pneumocystis pneumonia, tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, and herpes zoster).

RESULTS

The total number of Pneumocystis pneumonia, tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, and herpes zoster patients with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib treatment history in RA was 765, 1158, 834, and 18,336, respectively. The incidence rates of each OI for all biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were 0.14, 0.14, 0.09, and 2.40 per 100 person-years, respectively, while for tofacitinib they were 0.22, 0.22, 0.07, and 7.00 per 100 person-years. No big difference was observed among biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. All OIs showed higher incidence in those >65 years, but Pneumocystis pneumonia, nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, and herpes zoster showed no difference between those 65-74 years old and those >75 years old. The median of occurrence was the third, seventh, ninth, and thirteenth month after treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We counted real incidence rates of OIs for the whole nation from big claims data.

Computed tomography for malignancy screening in patients with rheumatoid arthritis before initiation of disease modifying antirheumatic drug

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of screening for malignancies using CT before the initiation of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with active RA.

METHODS

We examined 2192 patients with RA who underwent plain CT scans prior to the initiation of b/tsDMARDs. The sensitivity for detecting malignancy was measured and compared with that of regular screening (physical examination and X-ray). We then evaluated the clinical characteristics, prognosis and treatment of patients with RA with concomitant malignancies. Additionally, we determined the incidence rate of malignancy in patients with RA who were initiated on b/tsDMARDs after CT screening.

RESULTS

Of the 2192 patients, 33 (1.5%) were diagnosed with malignancy after CT screening. Whereas regular screening detected only seven malignancies, CT screening further detected 26 (including 19 at the early stage). On the other hand, 86% of the malignancies detectable by regular screening were at an advanced stage. Patients diagnosed with early-stage malignancies received RA treatments that included b/tsDMARDs after curative resection; 80% of these patients achieved low disease activity after 1 year. This rate was comparable to the patients without malignancy detection after screening (70%). The 5 year incidence of malignancy after the initiation of b/tsDMARDs after CT screening was lower than that of the RA cohort without CT screening (standardized incidence ratio: 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Screening in patients with RA using CT before the initiation of b/tsDMARDs allows for the early detection and treatment of malignancy, resulting in safer and more stable b/tsDMARD treatments.

Efficacy and safety of the anti-TNF multivalent NANOBODY® compound ozoralizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: A 52-week result of a Phase II/III study (OHZORA trial)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety through a 52-week treatment with subcutaneous ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group confirmatory trial included a 24-week double-blind treatment period followed by a 28-week open-label treatment period. The double-blind treatment period randomized 381 (2:2:1) patients to placebo and ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg, and patients receiving placebo were re-randomized (1:1) to ozoralizumab at 30 or 80 mg in the open-label period.

RESULTS

The ozoralizumab groups showed good clinical improvement, with high American College of Rheumatology response rates at 52 weeks, as well as good improvements in other endpoints, which were observed from Day 3 and maintained through Week 52. Furthermore, the ozoralizumab groups showed a high remission rate in clinical and functional remission at Week 52. Serious adverse events occurred in a total of 23 patients in the ozoralizumab groups, without differences in incidence between doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Ozoralizumab demonstrated significant therapeutic effects and efficacy, which was maintained for 52 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with the evaluated results in interim analysis at Week 24, and ozoralizumab was well-tolerated up to Week 52.

Reasons and risk factors for discontinuation of treatment with any biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A long-term observational study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) usually switch to a second biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when the first has proven to be ineffective, although some may discontinue bDMARDs treatment altogether. We investigated the total rate of bDMARDs retention and the risk of bDMARDs discontinuation in patients with RA.

METHODS

The study included 564 patients with RA who started bDMARDs treatment before 2008 (<65 years old, n = 413; ≥65, n = 151). The primary outcome was the incidence of bDMARDs discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Risk factors were examined using Fine and Gray regression models.

RESULTS

Among 564 patients, 74 had discontinued bDMARDs treatment due to AEs. Male sex and Steinbrocker class 3-4 were more frequent, while rheumatoid factor and concomitant methotrexate treatment were less frequent, in those aged ≥65 years than in those aged <65 years, respectively. The subdistribution hazard ratio for discontinuation was significantly higher in the ≥65 group than in the <65 years group (hazard ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval = 2.07-6.03). Lack of concomitant treatment with MTX was risk factor for discontinuation in patients ≥65 years. Advanced Steinbrocker class was a risk factor in patients <65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients are at higher risk of discontinuing bDMARDs treatment due to AEs than younger patients.

Better Safe than Sorry: Rheumatoid Arthritis, Interstitial Lung Disease, and Medication-A Narrative Review

It is well known that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at an increased risk of developing non-infectious pulmonary complications, especially interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, the clinician must keep in mind that lung disease could not only be a manifestation of the underlying condition, but also a consequence of using disease-modifying therapies. New-onset ILD or ILD worsening has also been reported as a possible consequence of both conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic agents. This study is a narrative review of the current literature regarding the potential risk of developing interstitial lung disease along with the administration of specific drugs used in controlling rheumatoid arthritis. Its purpose is to fill knowledge gaps related to this challenging patient cohort by addressing various aspects of the disease, including prevalence, disease features, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes.

Phase II/III Results of a Trial of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Multivalent NANOBODY Compound Ozoralizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous administration of 30 mg or 80 mg of ozoralizumab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose disease remained active despite MTX therapy.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase II/III trial, 381 patients were randomized to receive placebo, ozoralizumab 30 mg, or ozoralizumab 80 mg, plus MTX subcutaneously injected every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The primary end points were the response rates based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 16 and change in the Sharp/van der Heijde score (ΔSHS) from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at week 16 was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in both ozoralizumab groups (79.6% for 30 mg, 75.3% for 80 mg), compared with placebo (37.3%); these improvements were observed from the first week of treatment. The proportion of the patients with structural nonprogression (ΔSHS ≤0) was significantly higher in both ozoralizumab groups than in the placebo group. For some secondary end points, significantly greater improvements were observed starting from as early as day 3. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients in the ozoralizumab 30-mg group and 5 patients in the ozoralizumab 80-mg group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with active RA who received ozoralizumab in combination with MTX, the signs and symptoms of RA were significantly reduced as compared with the outcomes in those receiving placebo. Ozoralizumab demonstrated acceptable tolerability with no new safety signals when compared with other antibodies against tumor necrosis factor.

Increased susceptibility to pneumonia due to tumour necrosis factor inhibition and prospective immune system rescue via immunotherapy

Immunomodulators such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are used to treat autoimmune conditions by reducing the magnitude of the innate immune response. Dampened innate responses pose an increased risk of new infections by opportunistic pathogens and reactivation of pre-existing latent infections. The alteration in immune response predisposes to increased severity of infections. TNF inhibitors are used to treat autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, transplant recipients, and inflammatory bowel disease. The efficacies of immunomodulators are shown to be varied, even among those that target the same pathways. Monoclonal antibody-based TNF inhibitors have been shown to induce stronger immunosuppression when compared to their receptor-based counterparts. The variability in activity also translates to differences in risk for infection, moreover, parallel, or sequential use of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids makes it difficult to accurately attribute the risk of infection to a single immunomodulatory drug. Among recipients of TNF inhibitors, Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been shown to be responsible for 12.5-59% of all infections; Pneumocystis jirovecii has been responsible for 20% of all non-viral infections; and Legionella pneumophila infections occur at 13-21 times the rate of the general population. This review will outline the mechanism of immune modulation caused by TNF inhibitors and how they predispose to infection with a focus on Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Legionella pneumophila, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. This review will then explore and evaluate how other immunomodulators and host-directed treatments influence these infections and the severity of the resulting infection to mitigate or treat TNF inhibitor-associated infections alongside antibiotics.

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Adalimumab in Japanese Patients with Noninfectious Intermediate, Posterior, or Panuveitis: Post-Marketing Surveillance of 251 Patients

Introduction

The aim of this nationwide, prospective post-marketing surveillance was to assess the safety and effectiveness of up to 52 weeks of adalimumab treatment in patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis in Japanese clinical practice.

Methods

This post-marketing surveillance was conducted at 60 medical facilities in Japan from October 2016 to June 2020. Patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis who were administered adalimumab (Humira^®, AbbVie Inc.) for the first time were eligible. Subcutaneous adalimumab was initially administered at 80 mg, followed by 40 mg 1 week later, then 40 mg every 2 weeks. Safety measures included the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs; primary endpoint). Effectiveness measures included visual acuity, anterior chamber cell grade, vitreous haze, macular edema, foveal retinal thickness, uveitis recurrence rate, and oral corticosteroid dose. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).

Results

During 52 weeks of surveillance, AEs and ADRs occurred in 70 (27.9%) and 47 (18.7%) of 251 patients, respectively. The most common ADR was infection (21/251 patients; 8.4%), including serious infections in eight (3.2%) patients. ADRs were more frequent in patients ≥ 65 years of age, those with concurrent diseases, and those with past medical history. Four patients developed tuberculosis. The uveitis recurrence rate was 24.8% (61/246 patients). All effectiveness measures tended to improve from baseline to week 52, and mean corticosteroid doses decreased. Clinically meaningful changes were observed for most VFQ-25 subscales.

Conclusions

The safety profile of adalimumab was generally consistent with previous reports, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02916017.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00493-z.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Golimumab in Rheumatic Diseases: Post-Marketing Surveillance in Korea

Introduction

Golimumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Inhibition of TNF-α by golimumab inhibits the inflammatory response, thereby modulating the immune response in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Although the efficacy of golimumab has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), various patient populations, such as those at high risk of infection, including those with latent tuberculosis and various comorbidities, or on co-administered medications, were excluded from the RCTs. Therefore, safety cannot be sufficiently evaluated by RCTs in the patient group with heterogenous characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondyloarthritis (AS) in a real-world setting in Korea.

Methods

We conducted an open-label, prospective, non-interventional study as post-marketing surveillance. Safety was evaluated by collecting and recording adverse events, and effectiveness was evaluated by assessing disease activity using DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR, ACR20, and ASAS20 outcome measures. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of adverse events, and changes in disease activity scores from baseline were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

A total 673 patients were enrolled, of whom 621 were included in the safety analysis. During the study, 97 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 62 patients (10.0%). The most frequently reported ADRs were related to infection, including nasopharyngitis (0.8%), upper respiratory tract infection (0.6%), and herpes zoster (0.5%). The mean (± standard deviation) changes from baseline in global disease activity at weeks 12 and 24 were − 3.37 ± 2.529 and − 3.68 ± 2.404, respectively, with statistical significance. In those patients with RA, 72.5 and 47.0% of individuals had a good response based on DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR outcomes at week 24. At week 24, 71.4% of patients with PsA had an ACR20 response and 72.9% of patients with AS had an ASAS20 response.

Conclusion

In the real-world setting, golimumab was safe and effective in Korean patients with RA, PsA, and AS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00352-6.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in interstitial lung disease of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication that represents the second leading cause of death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Treatment of RA-ILD remains controversial. The absence of randomized clinical trials and specific ACR or EULAR therapeutic guidelines makes it difficult to establish solid therapeutic recommendations on this issue. In this scenario, real-world data is especially valuable.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature evidence on the efficacy and safety of abatacept (ABA) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), given its clinical relevance and the lack of consensus on its therapeutic management.

METHODS

PUBMED and EMBASE were searched from the date of approval of ABA to the end of 2020 using a combination of RA, ILD and ABA terms following PRISMA guidelines. Identified studies were evaluated by two independent investigators.

RESULTS

Nine original studies (1 case series and 8 observational studies) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. No randomized trial or meta-analysis were identified. The mean age of patients ranged from 61.2 to 75 years and the mean RA duration varied from 7.4 to 18 years. Subcutaneous ABA (74.5%-91%) predominated in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) (58%-75%), and it was used as first-line biologic agent in 22.8%-64.9% of the patients. The mean course of ILD ranged from 1 to 6.7 years, being usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia the most frequent patterns. Improvement or stabilization of ILD imaging (76.6%-92.7%) and FVC or DLCO (>85%) was described after a mean follow-up of 17.4-47.8 months, regardless of the pattern of lung involvement, being more remarkable in patients with shorter evolution of ILD. ABA led to significantly lower ILD worsening rates than TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and was associated with a 90% reduction in the relative risk of deterioration of ILD at 24 months of follow-up compared to TNFi and csDMARDs. Combination with methotrexate may have a corticoid-sparing effect. No unexpected adverse events were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that ABA may be a plausible alternative to treat RA patients with ILD. It would be highly desirable to develop prospective randomized controlled studies to confirm these findings.

Effect of adalimumab interventions on general infection among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the safety of adalimumab in different dosages and durations of treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the infection risk in people who received adalimumab. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception to December 8, 2020. Summary estimates were obtained  using meta-analysis with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs, considered to be of high quality, were analyzed. We found that there was a risk of infection (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18). In the stratified analysis, we found an increase in infection among those that received normal dosage (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23), and in patients with psoriasis (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00-1.35) and rheumatoid arthritis (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41), but not in those that received high doses and other criteria. In the meta-regressions, intervention duration was not related to changes in incidence risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials that have a longer treatment duration and higher doses are needed to clarify whether patients that received adalimumab had an elevated risk of general infection.

Predictors for clinical effectiveness of baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients in routine clinical practice: data from a Japanese multicenter registry

This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety profiles of baricitinib and explore factors associated with improved short-term effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. A total of 113 consecutive RA patients who had been treated with baricitinib were registered in a Japanese multicenter registry and followed for at least 24 weeks. Mean age was 66.1 years, mean RA disease duration was 14.0 years, 71.1% had a history of use of biologics or JAK inhibitors (targeted DMARDs), and 48.3% and 40.0% were receiving concomitant methotrexate and oral prednisone, respectively. Mean DAS28-CRP significantly decreased from 3.55 at baseline to 2.32 at 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, 68.2% and 64.1% of patients achieved low disease activity (LDA) and moderate or good response, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that no previous targeted DMARD use and lower DAS28-CRP score at baseline were independently associated with achievement of LDA at 24 weeks. While the effectiveness of baricitinib was similar regardless of whether patients had a history of only one or multiple targeted DMARDs use, patients with previous use of non-TNF inhibitors or JAK inhibitors showed lower rates of improvement in DAS28-CRP. The overall retention rate for baricitinib was 86.5% at 24 weeks, as estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 6.5% at 24 weeks. Baricitinib significantly improved RA disease activity in clinical practice. Baricitinib was significantly more effective when used as a first-line targeted DMARDs.

Tuberculosis screening and management of latent tuberculosis infection prior to biologic treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A longitudinal population-based analysis using claims data

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Screening for tuberculosis before treating with biologic agents is recommended in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We conducted this study to identify adherence to the recommended practice in a real-world setting in Japan.

METHODS

We used a community-based insurance claims database in a city in the Greater Tokyo Area in Japan. Between July 2012 and January 2019, we enrolled patients with IMIDs in the age range 15 to 74 years who had initiated biologic therapy. Tuberculosis screening was defined as (a) interferon-γ release assay and/or a tuberculin skin test (IGRA/TST) and (b) IGRA/TST and X-ray and/or CT scan (X-ray/CT) within 2 months before starting biologic agents. We analyzed the proportions of patients who underwent tuberculosis screening and their association with the patient- and treatment-related factors and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).

RESULTS

Of 421 patients presumed to have initiated biologic therapy, 202 (48%) underwent IGRA/TST and 169 (40%) underwent IGRA/TST and X-ray/CT. Patients aged 65 to 74 years were more likely to undergo tuberculosis screening than those aged 45 to 64 years. Compared to infliximab, IGRA/TST was less frequently performed in patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. Treatment for LTBI was provided to 67 (16%) patients. Proportions of patients receiving LTBI treatment did not significantly differ according to the screening status.

CONCLUSION

There was low adherence to the recommendations for tuberculosis screening and prophylactic treatment before biologic therapy. It is necessary to continue alerting clinical practitioners to the importance of screening for tuberculosis and treatment for LTBI.

Pharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overview

Since we have gained an understanding of the immunological pathophysiology of rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, treatment based on biological drugs has become a fundamental axis. These therapies are oriented towards the regulation of cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, and the modulation of cell-mediated immunity (B cells and T cells) by anti CD20 or anti CTAL-4 agents, and can increase the risk of associated infections or adverse events (AE). In this context, the entry of biotherapeutics represented a challenge for pharmacovigilance, risk management and approval by the main global regulatory agencies regarding biosimilars, where efficacy and safety are based on comparability exercises without being an exact copy in terms of molecular structure. The objective of this review is divided into three fundamental aspects: (i) to illustrate the evolution and focus of pharmacovigilance at the biopharmaceutical level, (ii) to describe the different approved recommendations of biopharmaceuticals (biological and biosimilars) and their use in rheumatic diseases (RDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other less frequent RD like cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (CAPS), and (iii) to identify the main AE reported in the post-marketing phase of RD biopharmaceuticals.

Relationship between the physician-based clinical scale for foot and ankle surgery and patient-reported outcomes in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a multicenter prospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To validate and establish targets for the physician-based clinical scale for foot surgery in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients based on patient-reported outcomes from a multicenter prospective cohort.

METHODS

We collected data on demographics, values from the RA foot and ankle scale by the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF-RA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) before (baseline) and 6 and 12 months after joint surgery. Target values for JSSF-RA were determined according to the lower limit of the 95% CI of JSSF-RA in patients with HAQ-DI ≤0.5 after adjusting for age and sex. We used multiple linear regression analysis to examine potential predictors of JSSF-RA target achievement at baseline.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from 417 cases. The JSSF-RA target for foot and ankle surgery was set at 74 according to the JSSF-RA value corresponding to HAQ-DI ≤0.5 (mean 77.6, 95% CI: 74.3-80.9). Longitudinal analysis of patients who underwent foot surgery (N = 59) determined target cut-off values of 1.188 and 65 for HAQ-DI and JSSF-RA at baseline, respectively, as being predictive for achieving JSSF-RA ≥74 after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A JSSF-RA value of 74 represents an important target for patients with RA who have undergone foot surgery. In order to achieve this target, the timing of the surgery should be considered in the treatment of established RA patients.

The risk of interstitial lung disease during biological treatment in Japanese patients with psoriasis

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of biological agents for the treatment of psoriasis, the numbers of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with biologics have also increased. Many of these cases were associated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors, but cases associated with other families of biologics have also been reported in Japan.

AIM

To analyse the background factors of patients who developed ILD, and to discuss better management of biological treatment.

METHOD

We reviewed 246 patients with psoriasis who were treated with biological agents in our department to identify any pulmonary adverse events (AEs). Data on patients who developed ILD were extracted to analyse background factors, clinical type of psoriasis, time to onset of ILD, pre-existing ILD, smoking habit and prescribed drugs.

RESULTS

Pulmonary AEs were seen in 22 cases, of which 11 were diagnosed as drug-induced ILD. The causative drugs were mainly TNF-α inhibitors, accounting for eight cases (six treated with infliximab, two with adalimumab). The remaining three cases were associated with secukinumab, ustekinumab and ixekizumab (n = 1 each). Notably, these three cases also had a history of drug-induced ILD.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of drug-induced ILD seem to be more susceptible to developing another ILD induced by biologics, even if treated with interleukin-17 inhibitors. Thorough screening of risk factors and evaluation for eligibility, and careful monitoring during treatment are the best solutions to avoid serious pulmonary AE. Early detection and precise diagnosis of pulmonary AEs, especially differentiation from infectious diseases, is essential for managing biological treatment.

Differential long-term retention of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by age group from the FIRST registry

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) by age group (< 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years) are uncertain. We examined retention rates reflecting the effectiveness and safety of bDMARDs in actual clinical practice for clarifying optimal therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by age groups.

METHODS

Data of patients who were treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), abatacept (ABA), and tocilizumab (TCZ) between February 2011 and April 2017 were collected from a prospective observational registry of RA patients. A total of 1362 patients were enrolled, of which 695 were aged < 65 years, 402 were aged 65-74 years, and 265 were aged ≥ 75 years. Primary outcome was the drug retention rate in adjusted data using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on generalized propensity scores.

RESULTS

In patients aged < 65 years, 3-year retention rates of TNFi, ABA, and TCZ were 43%, 47%, and 69%, respectively (ABA versus TCZ, p = 0.017; TNFi versus TCZ, p = 0.002). In patients aged 65-74 years, 3-year retention rates of TNFi, ABA, and TCZ were 44%, 53%, and 60%, respectively (TCZ versus TNFi, p = 0.034). In patients aged ≥ 75 years, 3-year retention rates for TNFi, ABA, and TCZ were 38%, 63%, and 58%, respectively (ABA versus TNFi, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the effectiveness and safety of TCZ were maximal in patients aged < 75 years and that patients aged ≥ 75 years might be suitable candidates for TCZ and ABA therapy. The use of therapeutic strategies appropriate to each age group might improve the outcomes of bDMARD therapy for RA.

Whole genome sequencing to identify predictive markers for the risk of drug-induced interstitial lung disease

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) is a serious side effect of chemotherapy in cancer patients with an extremely high mortality rate. In this study, to identify genetic variants with greater risk of DIILD, we carried out whole genome sequencing (WGS) of germline DNA samples from 26 patients who developed DIILD, and conducted a case-control association study between these 26 cases and general Japanese population controls registered in the integrative Japanese Genome Variation Database (iJGVD) as a screening study. The associations of 42 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) showing P < 0.0001 were further validated using an independent cohort of 18 DIILD cases as a replication study. A further combined analysis of the screening and replication studies showed a possible association of two SNVs, rs35198919 in intron 1 of the chromosome 22 open reading frame 34 (C22orf34) and rs12625311 in intron 1 of the teashirt zinc finger homeobox 2 (TSHZ2), with DIILD (P_combined = 1.87 × 10⁻⁵ and 5.16 × 10⁻⁵, respectively). Furthermore, in a subgroup analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD), we observed seven candidate SNVs that were possibly associated with ILD (P < 0.00001). This is the first study to identify genetic markers for the risk of DIILD using WGS. Collectively, our novel findings indicate that these SNVs may be applicable for predicting the risk of DIILD in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab: An interventional study

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) discontinuation in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with sustained low disease activity undergoing combination therapy with tocilizumab (TCZ) plus MTX.Methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective study included RA patients maintaining low disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10) for ≥12 weeks with TCZ plus MTX. Methotrexate was discontinued following 12 weeks of biweekly administration while continuing TCZ therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity with no flare at week 36.Results: A total of 49 patients completed 36 weeks of therapy. The proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity at week 36 was 75.5%. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeded the assumed threshold response rate of 60%, demonstrating the clinical feasibility of MTX discontinuation. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, defined as a Frequency Scale for Symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux disease score ≥8, significantly decreased from week 0 to 12 (27.1-18.4%; p= .025).Conclusion: Discontinuation of concomitant MTX is clinically feasible for maintaining low disease activity, and may be beneficial from the perspective of reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in Japanese RA patients treated with TCZ. Trial registration number: UMIN000021247.

Effectiveness, safety, and methotrexate dose-tapering pattern over two years of treatment with adalimumab and ≥12 mg/week methotrexate for early rheumatoid arthritis: Results of the HAWK postmarketing surveillance study in Japan

Objectives: To investigate the long-term effectiveness, safety, and methotrexate (MTX) dose-tapering patterns in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving adalimumab plus high-dose MTX.Methods: In this prospective, postmarketing study (2012-2017), conducted at 128 sites in Japan, biologic-naïve patients with RA (duration ≤2 years) previously treated with MTX for ≥3 months, initiated treatment with adalimumab and MTX (≥12 mg/week). Effectiveness by Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), safety, and MTX dose-tapering were assessed from baseline to 104 weeks.Results: In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 292), DAS28-CRP remission (<2.6) was achieved in 92.3% (n = 120/130) of patients at week 104. The proportions of patients receiving MTX dose <10 mg/week increased to 32.3% (n = 50/155) and ≥12 mg/week reduced to 52.9% (n = 82/155) by week 104. Per univariate regression analysis, MTX dose tapering was associated with longer adalimumab drug survival. Of 70 patients with joint X-rays available, 59 (84.3%) achieved Δ modified total Sharp score ≤1.0 at 104 weeks. In the safety analysis set (n = 300), 143 adverse drug reactions were reported in 92 patients (30.7%, non-serious; 24.7%, serious 8.7%).Conclusion: The long-term effectiveness and safety of adalimumab with high-dose MTX was confirmed in biologic-naïve patients with early RA in a real-world setting in Japan.Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01736189; retrospectively registered 29 November 2012, due to administrative reasons).

Tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an update

INTRODUCTION

Tofacitinib inhibits the Janus kinases, tyrosine kinases that are activated by cytokines involved in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Areas covered: Clinical trials have revealed an anti-rheumatic effect of monotherapy and combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX). Post-hoc analysis of those clinical trials and real-world experiences will be reviewed to explore efficacy and safety. Expert commentary: The efficacy of tofacitinib monotherapy has garnered much attention and has been initiated in large number of patients. However, combination therapy with MTX is necessary in order to achieve the maximum effect. Combination therapy can be transferred to monotherapy by tapering and/or discontinuing MTX. The discontinuation of tofacitinib should be avoided and tapering should be investigated. There has been no new safety signal although venous thrombotic events (VTEs) have been raised and would require long-term follow-up. Increased events of Herpes zoster were observed and the use of a subunit vaccination is expected to become an effective tool for prevention. Post-hoc analysis of the clinical trials and real-world experience is revealing further usefulness of tofacitinib not only in rheumatoid arthritis but also other diseases. Additional experience and data from the real world are required to help improve the use of tofacitinib..

Safety and efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of refractory uveoretinitis in Behçet's disease: a large-scale, long-term postmarketing surveillance in Japan

Background

Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody, has been reported to have excellent efficacy for refractory uveoretinitis in Behçet’s disease (RUBD), and was approved for this indication in Japan. However, the long-term safety profile and efficacy in real-world clinical settings in patients with RUBD have not been fully clarified. The BRIGHT study, a prospective, large-scale, long-term postmarketing surveillance (PMS) study, was conducted to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of infliximab in Japanese patients with RUBD.

Methods

All patients with RUBD who started infliximab treatment between January 2007 and January 2010 were enrolled. Safety was evaluated every 6 months for up to 24 months after initiation of therapy in 656 patients, and efficacy was evaluated in 650 patients. Patient characteristics were compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. The frequency of ocular attacks before and after infliximab treatment was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Independent associated factors for safety or efficacy were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. A two-sided p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Among the 656 patients evaluated for safety, 555 (84.6%) completed the 24-month study period. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs were 32.32% and 6.10%, respectively, and the safety profile was comparable to that of Japanese PMS of infliximab for other diseases. The most common ADRs and serious ADRs were infections (11.89% and 3.66%). Tuberculosis was reported in two patients, and Pneumocystis jirovecii in one. Identified independent associated factors for infections were comorbid respiratory disease, history of allergic disease, and concomitant use of glucocorticoids. Although infusion reactions were observed in 11.13% of patients, most were non-serious. The response rate at 24 months by physician global assessment was 80.7%. Median frequency of ocular attacks per 6 months significantly decreased compared with that before infliximab treatment (2.0 to 0.0), and corrected visual acuity was maintained during the study.

Conclusions

Infliximab treatment had good tolerability and efficacy in Japanese patients with RUBD in this large-scale, long-term PMS. Infliximab treatment seemed to be a good treatment option for RUBD in real-world clinical settings.

Trial registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000027733. Retrospectively registered on 6 June 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1793-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical effectiveness and long-term retention of abatacept in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients: Results from a multicenter registry system

Objective: To study the clinical effectiveness and long-term retention rate of abatacept (ABA) in elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a multicenter registry. Our study population comprised 500 consecutive RA patients treated with ABA. We compared clinical effectiveness and ABA retention rates between the Young (≤62 years), Middle (62 to 72 years), and Elderly (≥72 years) groups. We also performed separate examinations to identify predictive factors for ABA discontinuation in those with versus those without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment.Results: Mean age was 52.7 years in the Young group, 67.7 years in the Middle group, and 78.1 years in the Elderly group. No significant group-dependent differences were found in mean DAS28 score, categorical distribution of DAS28, and EULAR response rate across the 52 weeks. The ABA retention rates at three years as determined by the Kaplan-Meier method were similar in all three groups. Patient age was not a significant predictor of ABA discontinuation due to adverse events in patients with concomitant MTX; however, it was found to be a significant predictor for those who did not use MTX (Cox hazard model).Conclusion: ABA would be a reasonable treatment option for elderly RA patients from the viewpoints of both clinical effectiveness and long-term retention. However, physicians should watch carefully for any serious adverse reactions in elderly RA patients with intolerance to MTX.

Three-year safety and two-year effectiveness of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Results of long-term postmarketing surveillance

Objectives: To evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of etanercept (ETN) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: This postmarketing surveillance study (NCT00503139) assessed the safety and effectiveness of ETN treatment over 3 and 2 years (from June 2007 to September 2011), respectively. Safety was evaluated by occurrence and seriousness of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and of adverse events (AEs) for malignancies. Effectiveness was assessed using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) with four variables (swollen and tender joint counts, ESR, and patient global assessment; DAS28-4/ESR). Treatment was considered effective if patients had a good/moderate response by the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria. Results: ADRs occurred in 256/675 (37.9%) patients, the most common being injection site reactions (4.4%) and nasopharyngitis (3.3%). Serious ADRs occurred in 60/675 (8.9%) patients, the most frequent being pneumonia (1.2%). The incident rate of malignancies (AEs) was 1.06 per 100 patient-years. Mean baseline DAS28-4/ESR for the 581 patients included in effectiveness analysis was 5.42, which decreased to 3.32 at 2 years. Eighty-two percent of patients achieved a moderate/good response at 2 years. Conclusion: Long-term ETN treatment safety and effectiveness were sustained over 3 and 2 years, respectively.

Comparing the effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs using real-world data

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) by analyzing claims data of 13 Japanese national university hospitals.

METHODS

We evaluated 4970 cases of rheumatoid arthritis treated with bDMARDs from the Clinical Information Statistical Analysis database, which has collected and integrated 13 Japanese national university hospitals' claims data for 10 years. We surveyed the medications and calculated the retention rates of bDMARDs using the Kaplan-Meier method and differentiated the effectiveness between the two bDMARDs by comparing the retention rates after switching from one drug to another.

RESULTS

Of the 4970 cases, 1364 switched bDMARDs at least once. Tocilizumab (TCZ) reported the highest retention rate, whereas abatacept (ABT) revealed a similar rate compared with only naïve cases. The retention rate curves were higher in cases on TCZ that switched from the other bDMARDs than those in the reversed cases. Following TCZ, ABT and etanercept indicated better results than the other bDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

We could compare the effectiveness among bDMARDs by differentiating the retention rates from big claims data. TCZ reported higher retention rates in both naïve and switched cases than other bDMARDs.

Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

The phase III MONARCH randomized controlled trial (NCT02332590) demonstrated that in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sarilumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody) monotherapy is superior to adalimumab monotherapy in reducing disease activity and signs and symptoms of RA, as well as in improving physical function, with similar rates of adverse and serious adverse events. We report the effects of sarilumab versus adalimumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods

Patients with active RA intolerant of, or inadequate responders to, methotrexate were randomized to sarilumab 200 mg plus placebo every 2 weeks (q2w; n = 184) or adalimumab 40 mg plus placebo q2w (n = 185). Dose escalation to weekly administration of adalimumab or matching placebo was permitted at week 16. PROs assessed at baseline and weeks 12 and 24 included patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), pain and morning stiffness visual analogue scales (VASs), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F), Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID), and rheumatoid arthritis-specific Work Productivity Survey (WPS-RA). Between-group differences in least-squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline were analyzed. p < 0.05 was considered significant for PROs in a predefined hierarchy. For PROs not in the hierarchy, nominal p values are provided. Proportions of patients reporting improvements greater than or equal to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and achieving normative values were assessed.

Results

At week 24, sarilumab treatment resulted in significantly greater LSM changes from baseline than adalimumab monotherapy in HAQ-DI (p < 0.005), PtGA (p < 0.001), pain VAS (p < 0.001), and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) (p < 0.001). Greater LSM changes were reported for sarilumab than for adalimumab in RAID (nominal p < 0.001), morning stiffness VAS (nominal p < 0.05), and WPS-RA (nominal p < 0.005). Between-group differences in FACIT-F and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) were not significant. More patients reported improvements greater than or equal to the MCID in HAQ-DI (nominal p < 0.01), RAID (nominal p < 0.01), SF-36 PCS (nominal p < 0.005), and morning stiffness (nominal p < 0.05), as well as greater than or equal to the normative values in HAQ-DI (p < 0.05), with sarilumab versus adalimumab.

Conclusions

In parallel with the clinical efficacy profile previously reported, sarilumab monotherapy resulted in greater improvements across multiple PROs than adalimumab monotherapy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02332590. Registered on 5 January 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1614-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Characteristics of functional impairment in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis based on range of motion of joints: Baseline data from a multicenter prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of joint surgery in the treat-to-target era

OBJECTIVE

To explore the characteristics of functional impairment in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on the range of motion (ROM) of joints in a prospective observational study of RA patients undergoing joint surgery.

METHODS

We collected data on demographics, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the ROM of large joints including the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle. Associations between the ROM of each joint and disability in the eight HAQ-DI categories were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and logistic regression analyses. ROM cut-off values of each joint for the absence of disability in each HAQ-DI category were determined using ROC curves.

RESULTS

A total of 460 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this study. Based on ROC analysis, the ROM of each joint was significantly associated with disability in each category. After adjusting for disease activity, age, and sex, shoulder abduction had the highest independent impact on disability in activity [cut-off: 139 degrees (OR: 5.26)], elbow flexion-extension in dressing [121 degrees (OR: 2.22)], wrist flexion-extension in reach [86 degrees (OR: 2.71)], hip flexion-extension in walking [126 degrees (OR: 3.42)], and knee flexion-extension in walking [134 degrees (OR: 2.97)].

CONCLUSIONS

Limited ROM of multiple joints was significantly associated with functional impairment in patients with long-standing RA. Motion in daily activity involves multiple joints, and at least two joints were independently involved in disability.

Postmarketing surveillance evaluating the safety and effectiveness of golimumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of golimumab (GLM) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A postmarketing surveillance of 5154 patients was conducted with a follow-up duration of at least 24 weeks. Patients were divided into four groups based on the initial treatment: 50 mg or 100 mg of GLM with concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX) and 50 mg or 100 mg of GLM monotherapy. Patient characteristics at baseline, safety and effectiveness were assessed for each group.

RESULTS

Over 70% of patients received 50 mg of GLM with concomitant MTX, and approximately, 20% received monotherapy. The incidence rate of adverse events was 45.40 per 100 patient-years. The incidence of adverse events including serious adverse events was comparable across all groups. The proportion of patients showing remission or low disease activity increased from 13.69% to 46.21% at the final evaluation, and no differences were observed in the percentage of remission across the four groups. Concomitant MTX use was associated with higher probability of continuing therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

GLM showed effectiveness in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients with an acceptable safety profile.

The Use of patient Reported Outcome Measures for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan: A Systematic Literature Review

Background:

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) obtained through routine medical care may identify patients’ day-to-day burden and help tackle the disease from the patients’ perspective. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the availability of PRO data and PRO tools for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan.

Objective:

We reviewed the literature on PRO data availability and to identify PRO measures implemented in Japan for RA patients.

Method:

We conducted a systematic literature review using ICHUSHI and the PubMed databases on PRO measures for RA published from January 2011 to August 2015 in Japan.

Results:

After removing duplicates, 2423 manuscripts were found. From these, 100 manuscripts were included for review and analysis. We found 29 PRO tools that were used to assess various domains of health such as general well-being, pain, functionality, and fatigue. More than 90% of the studies utilized PRO tools for research purpose. Only one study reported PRO tool implementation in the routine medical care.

Conclusion:

The importance of PROs is recognized in Japan. PRO tools varied significantly and were mostly used for research purposes, while reports on the use of PRO measures in routine medical care were limited. Despite the awareness of PROs in the research community, unmet needs remain among RA patients in Japan. Further work is needed to investigate ways in which PROs can better reflect these unmet needs and be utilized in routine medical care.

Adalimumab with Methotrexate in Treatment-Naïve Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis at Risk of Progressive Structural Joint Damage: A Postmarketing Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab with methotrexate (MTX) in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)- and biologic-naïve Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at risk of progressive structural joint damage.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance study was conducted between February 2013 and April 2015 at 84 centers in Japan. Patients with RA at risk of progressive structural joint damage were enrolled and initiated treatment with adalimumab and MTX. Adverse events were recorded up to week 28. Effectiveness/disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (DAS28-4ESR and DAS28-4CRP), Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Simplified Disease Activity Index at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks. DAS28-4CRP response was evaluated in the low-dose (<8 mg/week) and high-dose (≥8 mg to ≤16 mg/week) MTX groups at week 24.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-seven of 163 patients comprised the safety cohort: mean (SD) age, 56.5 (13.9) years; females, 65.6%; rheumatoid factor positive, 73.2%; anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive, 66.9%; bone erosions, 51.6%; mean disease duration, 9.5 months. The majority of patients (≥80%) had moderate or high disease activity at baseline, and ≥50% with available data achieved remission or low disease activity at week 24 (DAS28-4CRP <3.2). Five serious adverse drug reactions occurred in four patients, including pyelonephritis, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, interstitial lung disease, pleurisy, and pericarditis; the outcomes were either recovered or recovering. Significant improvements/reductions in disease activity over 24 weeks were noted in all effectiveness measures (P < 0.0001). Most of the population achieved DAS28-4CRP remission (<2.6) at week 24 regardless of the MTX dose.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab in combination with MTX could be a beneficial treatment option for DMARD- and biologic-naïve Japanese patients with RA at risk of progressive structural joint damage.

FUNDING

AbbVie GK and Eisai.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01783730.

Impact of Adalimumab on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Large-Scale, Prospective, Single-Cohort ANOUVEAU Study

INTRODUCTION

The Adalimumab Non-interventional Trial for Up-verified Effects and Utility (ANOUVEAU) was a large-scale, multicenter, prospective, observational, single-cohort study that evaluated the effects of adalimumab (ADA) on rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related work productivity and activity impairment (RA-related WPAI) and disease activity in routine rheumatology care in Japan.

METHODS

Patients with RA were categorized as paid workers (PWs, ≥35 h/week), part-time workers (PTWs, <35 h/week), or homemakers (HMs, unemployed) and were administered the WPAI for RA (WPAI/RA) questionnaire. All patients who received ADA were followed for 48 weeks to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

RESULTS

Of the 1808 patients analyzed, 825, 243, and 740 patients were PWs, PTWs, and HMs, respectively. WPAI/RA domain scores significantly improved at weeks 12, 24, and 48 in all groups, with maximum improvement observed for PWs (p < 0.05). Additionally, remission rates (according to Disease Activity Score 28, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Simplified Disease Activity Index, or Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores) and EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level scores significantly increased from baseline to 48 weeks in all groups (p < 0.0001). Analysis of patient subgroups revealed better WPAI/RA outcomes for patients who were biologic-naïve, treated with concomitant methotrexate, or with RA duration of ≤2 years (p < 0.05). The rate of serious adverse events over 48 weeks of ADA treatment was 5.23%.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ADA provided sustained improvement in WPAI and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with RA.

FUNDING

AbbVie GK and Eisai Co., Ltd.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01346488.

Biologics-induced interstitial lung diseases in rheumatic patients: facts and controversies

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common, devastating pulmonary complication. An increased number of reports suggesting that biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) induced or exacerbated ILDs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has garnered increased attention. Areas covered: This article discusses ILDs induced by or exacerbated during biological therapy in RA patients. The article summarizes the efficacy and safety of a variety of licensed and off-label biologics clinically used for rheumatic diseases, focusing on the onset or exacerbation of RA-associated ILDs (RA-ILDs) in RA patients treated with biologics targeting tumor necrosis factor, CD20, interleukin 1 (IL-1) and IL-6 receptors. Additionally, the pathogenesis of RA-ILDs is discussed. Expert opinion: To some extent, the possibility of biologic-induced RA-ILDs increases the difficulty in choosing an optimal regimen for RA treatment with biological agents, as the relationship between biological therapy safety and the induction or exacerbation of RA-ILDs has not been established. A framework to assess baseline disease severity, particularly standardizing the evaluation of the pulmonary condition stage in RA patients and monitoring the outcome during the biological therapy treatment, is highly needed and may substantially help guide treatment decisions and predict the treatment benefits.

Effect of Methotrexate Plus Adalimumab on the Achievement of Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapeutic Goals: Post Hoc Analysis of Japanese Patients (MELODY Study)

INTRODUCTION

There is insufficient evidence regarding the appropriate dose of methotrexate (MTX) required to achieve specific treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving biologic drugs in Japan. The present study aimed to assess the dose-response effect of MTX in combination with adalimumab (ADA) to achieve low disease activity (LDA) and/or remission at 24 weeks in RA patients.

METHODS

This analysis used data of the ADA all-case survey in Japan (n = 7740), and 5494 patients who received ADA and MTX were classified into five groups by weighted average MTX dose (>0-<4, 4-<6, 6-<8, 8-< 10, and ≥10 mg/week). Of the 5494 patients, 3097 with baseline 28-joint disease activity score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate >3.2 were analyzed for effectiveness by MTX dose.

RESULTS

In biologic-naïve patients (n = 1996/3097), LDA/remission rates increased with MTX up to 6-<8 mg/week and then plateaued at higher doses (LDA, p = 0.0440; remission, p = 0.0422). In biologic-exposed patients (n = 1101/3097), LDA/remission rates increased with MTX dose (LDA, p = 0.0009; remission p = 0.0143). The incidences of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious infections did not differ by MTX dose, but total ADRs and infections were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with increased MTX doses.

CONCLUSION

The appropriate MTX doses in combination with ADA to achieve LDA and/or remission at week 24 were different between biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients with RA, suggesting that 8 mg/week of MTX would be enough for biologic-naïve patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01076959.

FUNDING

AbbVie and Eisai Co., Ltd.

Safety of Adalimumab and Predictors of Adverse Events in 1693 Japanese Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data from an all-cases post-marketing study were used to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease [CD].

METHODS

Patients received adalimumab for 24 weeks. Data from all patients [n = 1693] were used for the safety assessment. Data from patients with CD activity index [CDAI] ≥ 150 at baseline were used for the effectiveness assessment.

RESULTS

The most frequent serious adverse drug reaction [ADR] was infection and infestations [6.6 events/100 patient-years]. The risk of serious infections increased in patients who had a history of malignancy and those with concomitant corticosteroid use. Of 415 patients who had switched from another anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNFα] agent to adalimumab due to ADRs, 7.2% discontinued due to ADRs to adalimumab. Ten of 13 patients with a history of tuberculosis [TB] received prophylactic medication, and none developed TB. TB developed in one patient with no history of TB or anti-TB prophylaxis. Remission rates were 41.3% and 32.4% at 4 and 24 weeks, respectively. Remission rates did not differ between patients with and without concomitant use of immunomodulators. Predictive variables for increased effectiveness were CDAI ≤ 220 and disease duration of ≤ 2 years. Perianal lesions and loss of response to previous anti-TNFα agents affected effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequent serious ADR was infection. Adalimumab significantly reduced disease activity, without any unexpected ADRs. Development of active TB during adalimumab therapy can be prevented through TB screening and prophylaxis. In patients who switched from another anti-TNFα agent to adalimumab due to ADRs, adalimumab was well tolerated.