Efficacy and safety of rituximab in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis who are refractory to conventional therapy

The Immunobiological Agents for Treatment of Antiglomerular Basement Membrane Disease

Combination therapy with glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, and plasmapheresis is recommended as the standard treatment for anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease, but the prognosis of this disease remains poor. Several immunobiological agents have been administered or are expected to be useful for anti-GBM disease in light of refractory disease or the standard treatments' tolerability. Many data regarding the use of biologic agents for anti-GBM disease have accumulated, verifying the effectiveness and potential of biologic agents as a new treatment option for anti-GBM disease. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were shown to be useful in animal studies, but these agents have no clinical use and were even shown to induce anti-GBM disease in several cases. Although the efficacy of the TNF-receptor antagonist has been observed in animal models, there are no published case reports of its clinical use. There are also no published reports of animal or clinical studies of anti-B-cell-activating factor, which is a member of the TNF family of agents. Anti-interleukin (IL)-6 antibodies have been demonstrated to have no effect on or to exacerbate nephritis in animal models. Anti-C5 inhibitor was observed to be useful in a few anti-GBM disease cases. Among the several immunobiological agents, only rituximab has been demonstrated to be useful in refractory or poor-tolerance patients or small uncontrolled studies. Rituximab is usually used in combination with steroids and plasma exchange and is used primarily as an alternative to cyclophosphamide, but there is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of rituximab for anti-GBM disease, and thus, randomized controlled studies are required.

Differential expression of IFN-α, IL-12 and BAFF on renal immune cells and its relevance to disease activity and treatment responsiveness in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

Since molecularly targeted therapies are emerging for treating lupus nephritis (LN), this study aimed to assess the immunohistochemical findings of the cytokines in renal tissue and their pathological and clinical relevance in LN.

METHODS

Fifty patients with proliferative LN formed the case group; 5 with LN class II, IgA nephropathy and 10 with idiopathic haematuria were enrolled as controls. Immunohistochemical analysis for CD3, CD20, interferon (IFN)-α, interleukin (IL)-12/p40 and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) was performed by scoring the number of positive cells/area of the cortex. All immunohistochemical investigations were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded renal tissue. Proliferative LN cases were grouped by the dominant expression of IFN-α, IL-12/p40 and BAFF, and subsequently, clinicopathological features were compared.

RESULTS

Clinical data of patients with proliferative LN included urine protein creatinine ratio, 2.2 g/gCre; anti-double-stranded DNA antibody, 200.9 IU/mL; total complement activity (CH50), 21.9 U/mL and SLE Disease Activity Index, 19.8 points. Proliferative LN cases, including class III (n=18) and IV (n=32), were classified into three subgroups according to the immunohistochemical score based on the dominancy of IFN-α (n=17), IL-12 (n=16) and BAFF group (n=17) proteins. Hypocomplementaemia and glomerular endocapillary hypercellularity were significantly increased in the IFN-α group, whereas chronic lesions were significantly higher in the IL-12 group (p<0.05). The IFN-α group had a poorer renal prognosis in treatment response after 52 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunohistochemistry (IHC) of IFN-α, IL-12 and BAFF for proliferative LN enabled grouping. Especially, the IFN-α and IL-12 groups showed different clinicopathological features and renal prognoses. The results indicated the possibility of stratifying cases according to the IHC of target molecules, which might lead to precision medicine.

Rituximab in the real-world treatment of lupus nephritis: A retrospective cohort study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Although recommended in established international guidelines for lupus nephritis (LN), rituximab is not officially approved for LN treatment, making all such use off-label. The Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) conducted a retrospective observational study on real-world efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment for LN in Japan.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected from 47 hospitals for LN patients treated with rituximab to retrospectively investigate dosing schedule, efficacy, and safety.

RESULTS

This retrospective analysis included 115 patients: 84 (73%) received 375 mg/m2 weekly up to four doses, and 31 (27%) received 1000 mg/body in one or two doses 2 weeks apart. Rituximab significantly improved findings for urinalysis, systemic lupus erythematosus serology, and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity and was assessed as 'extremely effective' in 24.8% of patients and 'effective' in 60.2%. The renal response by the JCR-I criteria was 52.5% for overall response rate (ORR) (complete renal response rate 20.8% and partial renal response rate 31.7%) and that by the JCR-II criteria was 49.5% (21.8% and 27.7%, respectively). Corticosteroid dose was significantly reduced. Rituximab was well tolerated, with frequent but manageable adverse events of infusion reaction and infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab is effective for the treatment of Japanese patients with LN refractory to conventional therapy.

Rituximab Dosing in Glomerular Diseases: A Scoping Review

Purpose of Review

Rituximab is increasingly prescribed for glomerular diseases. However, the recently published Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases lacks details on recommended dosing regimens for most individual glomerular diseases. We performed this scoping review summarizing the evidence for rituximab dosing in glomerular disease.

Sources of Information

PubMed database.

Methods

The PubMed search methodology was developed with a medical librarian and performed by the first, with review by a second, author. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PCSs) examining rituximab efficacy and/or safety in antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), membranous nephropathy (MN), lupus nephritis (LN), or podocytopathies (minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [FSGS]) were included. Fifty-three studies (14 RCTs and 39 PCSs) were included.

Key Findings

We identified 16 different rituximab dosing regimens studied as induction therapy for one or more of the 5 glomerular diseases of interest. The most frequently studied rituximab induction regimens were 1000 mg as 2 doses 2 weeks apart (17 studies, 32%) and 4 doses of 375 mg/m²/week (18 studies, 33.9%). Twenty-six studies (49%) examined rituximab as monotherapy or in conjunction with corticosteroids alone, while the remaining studies examined rituximab as part of combination immunosuppression. Adapting treatment to achieve B-cell depletion, with frequent evaluation of disease-specific biomarkers, might prove the optimal approach to achieving and maintaining remission. Rituximab might also enable steroid minimization or avoidance.

Limitations

Restriction of the search to a single database and to studies published in the English language, and with an accompanying abstract, could have led to selection bias. While the search was limited to prospective observational studies and RCTs, no formal assessment of study quality was performed.

Lupus nephritis: new progress in diagnosis and treatment

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multifactorial autoimmune disease that affects many organs, including the kidney. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common manifestation characterized by heterogeneous clinical and histopathological findings, and often associates with poor prognosis. The diagnosis and treatment of LN is challenging, depending largely on renal biopsy, and there is no reliable non-invasive LN biomarker. Up to now, the complete remission rate of LN is only 20%∼30% after receiving six months of standard treatment, which is far from satisfactory. Moreover, adverse reactions to immunosuppressants, especially glucocorticoids, further compromise the prognosis of LN. Biological reagents targetting autoimmune responses and inflammatory pathways, bring hope to the treatment of intractable lupus. The European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) have been working on and launched the recommendations for the management of LN. In this review, we update our knowledge in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of LN and prospect for the future potential targets in the management of LN.

What Have We Learnt About the Treatment of Juvenile-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematous Since Development of the SHARE Recommendations 2012?

Introduction

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematous (JSLE) is a rare multisystem autoimmune disorder. In 2012, the Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) initiative developed recommendations for the diagnosis/management of JSLE, lupus nephritis (LN) and childhood-onset anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). These recommendations were based upon available evidence informing international expert consensus meetings.

Objective

To review new evidence published since 2012 relating to the management of JSLE, LN and APS in children, since the original literature searches informing the SHARE recommendations were performed.

Method

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched for relevant literature (2012-2021) using the following criteria: (1) English language studies; (2) original research studies regarding management of JSLE, LN, APS in children; (3) adult studies with 3 or more patients <18-years old, or where the lower limit of age range ≤16-years and the mean/median age is ≤30-years; (4) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case control studies, observational studies, case-series with >3 patients. Three reviewers independently screened all titles/abstracts against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. All relevant manuscripts were reviewed independently by at least two reviewers. Data extraction, assessment of the level of evidence/methodological quality of the manuscripts was undertaken in-line with the original SHARE processes. Specific PUBMED literature searches were also performed to identify new evidence relating to each existing SHARE treatment recommendation.

Results

Six publications met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for JSLE: three RCTs, one feasibility trial, one case series. For LN, 16 publications met the inclusion/exclusion criteria: eight randomized trials, three open label prospective clinical trials, five observational/cohort studies. For APS, no publications met the inclusion criteria. The study with the highest evidence was an RCT comparing belimumab vs. placebo, including 93 JSLE patients. Whilst the primary-endpoint was not met, a significantly higher proportion of belimumab-treated patients met the PRINTO/ACR cSLE response to therapy criteria. New evidence specifically addressing each SHARE recommendation remains limited.

Conclusion

Since the original SHARE literature searches, undertaken >10-years ago, the main advance in JSLE treatment evidence relates to belimumab. Additional studies are urgently needed to test new/existing agents, and assess their long-term safety profile in JSLE, to facilitate evidence-based practice.

Initial Preserved Renal Function as a Predictor of Favorable Renal Response to Rituximab in Refractory or Relapsing Lupus Nephritis: A Single-center Cohort Study in Korea

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies investigating the beneficial effect of rituximab on lupus nephritis (LN) reported controversial results There have been few reports of renal response to rituximab according to renal function We investigated the efficacy of rituximab in refractory/relapsing LN and the role of renal function as a predictor of renal response.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2019, we retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with refractory/relapsing LN receiving rituximab Renal responses (complete and partial) at 6 and 12 months were compared between normal (glomerular filtration rate [GFR]≥90 mL/min/173 m², n=11) and decreased (GFR<90 mL/min/173 m², n=11) GFR groups Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess predictors of renal response.

RESULTS

At baseline, the decreased GFR group had a higher urine proteinuria to creatinine ratio (p=0008) and proportion of refractory LN (p=0010) and previous cyclophosphamide therapy (p=0035) than the normal GFR group The overall renal response rate was 455% (10 patients) at 6 months and 545% (12 patients) at 12 months Renal response rates were higher in the normal GFR group (818% and 909% at 6 and 12 months, respectively) than in the decreased GFR group (91% and 182% at 6 and 12 months, respectively; p<0001) Normal GFR and anti-La were associated with renal response to rituximab, with hazard ratios of 9256 (p=0008) and 5478 (p=0041), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab is an effective therapy for refractory/relapsing LN, particularly in patients with preserved renal function.

Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose of Mycophenolate Mofetil Compared With Cyclophosphamide Pulse Therapy as Induction Therapy in Japanese Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the effectiveness and safety of induction therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Patients with LN administered MMF (n = 35) or IVCY (n = 25) plus high-dose corticosteroids between July 2015 and June 2020 were included. MMF was increased from 2 g/day to 3 g/day, with no adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was the 6-month renal remission rate. Secondary endpoints were retention rate and AEs.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex, disease duration, renal histological type, SLEDAI, and UPCR between the two groups. Twenty-six patients (74%) continued with MMF therapy, whereas twelve (48%) completed six IVCY courses. The retention rate was significantly higher in the MMF than in the IVCY group (p = 0.048). Twenty-four and fourteen patients in MMF and IVCY groups, respectively, achieved renal remission with insignificant differences. Grade 3 or higher AEs were observed in eight and fourteen patients in the MMF and IVCY groups, respectively (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of high-dose MMF was comparable to that of IVCY in Japanese patients with proliferative LN, with fewer AEs and a higher retention rate than IVCY, suggesting the high tolerability of MMF.

Efficacy and safety of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, for lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) for lupus nephritis are still a controversial issue.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for all clinical controlled studies.

RESULTS

Six studies with 588 patients were included in our meta-analysis. RTX increased total renal remission rates (TR, odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.55, P = .003) and complete renal remission rate (CR, OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.94, P = .02) compared with the control group. Subgroup analyses showed that rituximab was more effective at increasing the rate of TR and CR for lupus nephritis patients compared with mycophenolate mofetil (TR, OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.29 to 16.47, P = .02; CR, OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.47, P = .02) and cyclophosphamide (TR, OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.31 to 6.40, P = .009; CR, OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.4, P = .02). Rituximab also had advantage in reducing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score (-2.49, 95% CI -3.77 to -1.22, P = .0001). There were no significant differences between the RTX group and control group on the change of proteinuria (-0.36 g/d, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.00 g/d, P = .05) and serum creatinine (0.13 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.42 mg/dL, P = .36). RTX treatment did not increase the risk of adverse events compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides clear beneficial effects of RTX in patients with lupus nephritis. In addition, RTX therapy did not increase the risk of adverse events compared to the control group.

The growing role of precision medicine for the treatment of autoimmune diseases; results of a systematic review of literature and Experts' Consensus

Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) share similar serological, clinical, and radiological findings, but, behind these common features, there are different pathogenic mechanisms, immune cells dysfunctions, and targeted organs. In this context, multiple lines of evidence suggest the application of precision medicine principles to AIDs to reduce the treatment failure. Precision medicine refers to the tailoring of therapeutic strategies to the individual characteristics of each patient, thus it could be a new approach for management of AIDS which considers individual variability in genes, environmental exposure, and lifestyle. Precision medicine would also assist physicians in choosing the right treatment, the best timing of administration, consequently trying to maximize drug efficacy, and, possibly, reducing adverse events. In this work, the growing body of evidence is summarized regarding the predictive factors for drug response in patients with AIDs, applying the precision medicine principles to provide high-quality evidence for therapeutic opportunities in improving the management of these patients.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Targeted literature review of the epidemiology, current treatment and disease burden in the Asia Pacific region

OBJECTIVE

To understand the epidemiology, current treatment and disease burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the Asia Pacific region (APAC).

METHODS

A targeted literature review of published evidence on SLE in APAC was conducted, using the MEDLINE® database (2008-2018), conference proceedings and other supplementary sources.

RESULTS

The review identified 70 studies conducted in China (n=15), Japan (n=13), Taiwan (n=12), Korea (n=9), Australia (n=7), Hong Kong (n=6), Singapore (n=4), and multiple places within the APAC region (n=4). Incidence rates (per 100,000 per year) ranged from 0.9-8.4, while prevalence rates ranged from 3.7-127 (per 100,000); however, recent data was limited. Asian SLE patients were reported to have higher disease severity, activity (higher SLE disease activity index scores) and organ damage accrual; along with increased morbidity, mortality, and susceptibility to renal involvement compared with other ethnicities in APAC. The risk of developing SLE is higher in the Asian population. Routinely used SLE therapies included belimumab, hydroxychloroquine, cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids; however, prescribing patterns varied across the region. Increased disease activity was associated with high economic burden and poor quality of life for SLE patients in APAC.

CONCLUSION

SLE remains a disease with a significant unmet medical need for an innovative therapy that is well-tolerated and effective for patients in APAC. Further evidence is required to better characterize the disease and fully capture the burden and impact of SLE in APAC. This review has highlighted where there is a paucity of data from patients across the APAC region.

Which is the best SLE activity index for clinical trials?

Following the advent of molecular targeted drugs, a paradigm shift in treatment similar to that in rheumatoid arthritis has been expected in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but clinical trials for drugs that many specialists believed to be effective have failed repeatedly. The causes are not simple, but include the heterogeneity of SLE, inclusion criteria, lack of appropriate disease activity measures, and relapse criteria. This review outlines the disease activity indices used in SLE, discusses their advantages and disadvantages, and describes the ideal activity index.

Rituximab use as induction therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab (RTX) has important usage in rheumatoid arthritis and vasculitis. There remains a need for more, better, and safer treatments for patients with lupus nephritis (LN). RTX has been trialed in such patients without definitive conclusions about its effectiveness. As a role for RTX has not been clearly established for LN, we carried out a systematic review and analysis.

METHODS

We identified 31 studies of RTX for class I-VI LN, and assessed complete renal response (CRR) and partial renal response (PRR) using criteria including serum creatinine, proteinuria, and urinary sediment. Due to differences in the pediatric presentation of the disease, studies focusing on pediatric patients were excluded.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed superiority of RTX+cyclophosphamide (CYC) versus CYC alone (64% vs. 21% CRR and 19% vs. 36% PRR). Six prospective and retrospective studies utilizing RTX monotherapy found 66% CRR or PRR in all patients. Eleven studies that investigated RTX in combination with CYC or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) also found 66% CRR or PRR in all patients. In total, the CRR for Caucasian, East Asian, and Hispanic patients were 77%, 38%, and 28%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX appeared to benefit certain LN patients, but most studies were not randomized or properly controlled, were heterogeneous in design, subjects, and LN types, and were not comparable, and must therefore be interpreted cautiously. RTX alone may not deplete B cells sufficiently for the perturbations of LN. In addition, RTX may induce responses differently among patients of different ethnic and racial backgrounds. Furthermore, there were wide variations in the baseline characteristics of the patients, namely LN class, time course of disease, age, and prior immunosuppressive use. We suggest a prospective RCT in patients aged 18-65 years with class IV LN. Ideally, the patients would not have received prior immunosuppression and would better represent different ethnicities. The treatment groups would be RTX, RTX+belimumab, CYC, and MMF groups, with pulse-dose steroids during induction followed by maintenance steroids and MMF. The CRR and PRR would be assessed at 12 and 24 months. This or a similar study might clarify RTX's role in the treatment of LN.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus) is characterized by aberrant activity of the immune system, leading to variable clinical symptoms. Lupus is more prevalent in African American women and women in other ethnic minority groups. Diagnosing, treating, and identifying novel therapies for lupus is challenging because of its genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Lupus nephritis is the most common target-organ manifestation and requires individualized care to minimize toxicity. A multidisciplinary approach to caring for pregnant patients with lupus is essential to optimize outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab for systemic lupus erythematosus treatment: a meta-analysis

Background:

Given the inconsistency of previous studies and the newly emerging evidence, we decided to conduct a meta-analysis.

Methods:

The meta-analysis included 2 randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies 742 patients in total. Qualified studies were properly searched from databases . Data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.3 software. Results were demonstrated as WMD , SMD and RR with 95% CIs, I² and P value.

Results:

we observed that a remarkable increase of complement C3 in the rituximab group than placebo group (WMDfixed= 7.67mg/dL, 95%CIs=−0.16~15.50, I²=0%, P=0.05). A significant increase of complement C4 was observed in the rituximab group than placebo group (WMDfixed=3.14mg/dL, 95%CIs=1.06~5.22, I²=0%, P=0.003). Notably decreased peripheral CD19+B cells in rituximab group than placebo group (WMDfixed=−117.93n/µl, 95%CIs=−172.94~−62.91, I²=0%, P<0.0001) in RCTs. Patients with severe or refractory SLE got more satisfactory efficacy results after receiving rituximab in observational studies, such as British Isles Lupus Assessment Group index score, SLE Disease Activity Index score, complement C3/C4, anti-dsDNA antibodies, peripheral CD19⁺B cells and so on. Safety profiles were no difference between rituximab and placebo groups.

Conclusion:

although the efficacy of rituximab is highly controversial for SLE, our study shows that rituximab presents a satisfying efficacy and safety for SLE.

Immunoglobulin Binding Protein 1 as a Potential Urine Biomarker in Patients with Lupus Nephritis

We evaluated the role of immunoglobulin binding protein 1 (IGBP1), a phosphoprotein associated with the B cell receptor (BCR) complex, as a urine biomarker in lupus nephritis (LN). The IGBP1 concentrations in plasma and urine of patients with LN, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) without nephritis and healthy controls were estimated by ELISA. IGBP1 expression in the kidneys of LN patients and transplantation donors was detected by immunohistochemistry. Microarray-based global gene expression profile of HK-2 cells with IGBP1 knock-down and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for intracellular IGBP1 expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was performed. Urine IGBP1 levels were elevated significantly in LN patients, and it correlated with the clinical activity indices (complement 3 (C3) level, anti-dsDNA antibodies titer, SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and histological activity index. IGBP1 expression was increased in LN patients as compared to the donors and was detected mainly in the tubules by histopathology. In microarray analysis, several genes related to SLE pathogenesis (PPME1, ROCK2, VTCN1, IL-17R, NEU1, HLA-DM, and PTX3) responded to siRNA-mediated IGBP1 silencing. In FACS, IGBP1 was expressed mainly in the CD14⁺ cells. The overall expression of IGBP1 in PBMCs was higher in LN patients as compared with that in SLE patients without nephritis. Conclusively, urinary IGBP1 may be a novel biomarker reflecting the clinical and histological activities in LN.

Disease severity and economic burden in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective, observational study

Aim

To describe the healthcare resource utilization (HRU), direct medical costs and clinical characteristics for Japanese patients with mild, moderate or severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The primary objectives were to describe HRU and examine the direct medical costs for Japanese patients with mild, moderate, or severe SLE over the 3‐year study period. Secondary objectives included recording patient demographics, clinical characteristics and frequency and cost of mild, moderate or severe flares. Exploratory objectives included a description of treatment patterns, and to explore which factors affect medical costs.

Methods

This retrospective, observational cohort study identified patients with SLE (diagnosed April 2010 to March 2012), from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database.

Result

The study cohort comprised 295 patients with mild (28, 9.5%), moderate (134, 45.4%), or severe (133, 45.1%) SLE. Outpatient visits, hospitalizations and emergency room stays were experienced by 295 (100%), 116 (39.3%) and 31 (10.5%) patients, respectively, over the 3‐year study period. Over the 3‐year period, the mean total direct medical cost was US$27 004, and cost increased with SLE severity: mild, $5549 moderate, $15 290; and severe, $43 322 (analysis of variance, P < 0.0001). During this period, the majority of patients (282, 95.6%) experienced at least one flare episode and the mean (standard deviation) frequency was 5.5 (3.3) flares. The mean total direct medical cost per flare increased with SLE severity.

Conclusion

This descriptive study provides information on the economic burden and clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with SLE based on claims data; high levels of HRU and direct medical costs were exhibited, particularly in patients with moderate or severe disease.

Efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 antibody rituximab for patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

We examined the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

The study enrolled 63 SLE patients who were treated with rituximab between 2002 and 2015. The participants underwent a battery of tests before treatment and at one year. Treatment ranged from two to four times at 500 or 1000 mg.

Results

Baseline characteristics were males:females = 6:57, age 33.9 years, and disease duration 87.2 months. The primary endpoint: The rate of major clinical response (MCR) was 60% while the partial clinical response (PCR) was 25%. Thirty of 36 (83%) patients with lupus nephritis (WHO II: 2, III: 5, IV: 22, V: 4, IV+V: 2, not assessed: 1) and 22 of 24 patients (92%) with neuropsychiatric SLE, who could be followed at one year, showed changes from BILAG A or B score to C or D score at one year. Multivariate analysis identified high anti-dsDNA antibody and shorter disease duration as significant determinants of MCR at one year. Repeat examination was conducted at five years. Primary failure was recorded in 8.8% and secondary failure in 32.4% (time to relapse: 24.4 months). Rituximab was well tolerated although 65 adverse events, mostly infections, were recorded within one year.

Conclusion

Rituximab is potentially efficacious for the treatment of patients with refractory SLE.

Single-dose rituximab in refractory lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Off-label use of rituximab in lupus nephritis is reported to be beneficial. While the optimal dose is unknown, the regimen of four intravenous doses of 375 mg/m(2) is commonly employed, despite expense and potential side-effects.

AIM

To investigate the response to single-dose rituximab, added to standard corticosteroids plus additional immunosuppressive agent, in refractory lupus nephritis.

METHODS

Consecutive consenting patients with refractory lupus nephritis despite steroids plus either cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate or azathioprine were enrolled in this ethics-approved, open-label, prospective study. After baseline assessment, patients received one intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m(2) rituximab. Clinical, biochemical and serological (DsDNA, complement) responses to this dose were analysed. Complete renal response (CR) was defined as normalisation of creatinine, albumin, proteinuria and urinary RBCs and partial response (PR) as ≥50% improvement in at least one parameter, without deterioration in others. B-cell depletion was defined as peripheral CD19 lymphocyte count ≤0.05 × 10(9) /L.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study. All were B-cell-depleted until 8 months post-dose. Eleven patients (79%) responded (2CR, 9PR) at a median time of 5 months, with a 6-month probability of renal response of 43%. Five patients (45%) relapsed at a median time of 17 months. DsDNA titres decreased in 69%. Side-effects were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose rituximab is effective in relapsed/refractory lupus nephritis. Longevity of B-cell depletion with single-dose rituximab is similar to that of four doses with potentially fewer side-effects.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Preliminary Observations for Clinical Activity and Safety of Multiple Doses of Human Mouse Chimeric Anti-CD22 Monoclonal Antibody (SM03) in Chinese Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

SM03 is a novel recombinant, human/mouse chimeric immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody directed against the CD22 antigen on human B lymphocytes. This was the first study to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, safety and clinical activity of SM03 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

This study was an open, multiple-centre, parallel-group, multiple-ascending-dose, phase I study in 29 SLE patients. Pharmacokinetic assessment was conducted in 22 of these patients. Eligible patients received multiple intravenous infusions of SM03 for 4 weeks (240 mg/m², 600 or 900 mg, once weekly) and were monitored over an 84-day observation period for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, safety and clinical response.

RESULTS

After multiple-dose SM03, the maximal serum concentration of SM03 was reached within 3-7 h. The mean elimination half-life was 15 days. The average accumulation ratios of the area under the time-concentration curve and the maximum concentration after the fourth administration of SM03 were 2.0 and 1.5. CD19⁺ B-lymphocyte counts were decreased. Infections were the most common adverse events. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported. The therapeutic benefit of SM03 was observed mainly in patients with moderate-to-severe disease activity.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacokinetic exposure increased in a lower-than-dose-proportional manner up to 900 mg. SM03 was well tolerated at doses ranging from 240 mg/m² to 900 mg, with no new safety signals identified. SM03 has potential efficacy in Chinese patients with SLE.

Blisibimod for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: with trials you become wiser

INTRODUCTION

Blisibimod is a potent and selective inhibitor of B cell activating factor (BAFF), a mediator of differentiation, maturation and survival of B cells. It has a unique tetravalent, 'peptibody' structure and resulting high potency, and is currently in clinical evaluation for the treatment of SLE. The importance of BAFF in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is under intense investigation. The anti BAFF monoclonal antibody belimumab was approved by the FDA for the treatment of SLE.

AREAS COVERED

The general properties of blisibimod are reviewed including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties in patients with SLE, efficacy and safety in the phase 2 PEARL-SC and open-label extension trials, and the focus in the ongoing phase 3 trial (CHABLIS-SC1) on the hypothesized 'responder' population. In addition, the rationale for evaluating blisibimod in patients with IgA nephropathy, a common nephritic disease for which there is no approved therapy, is presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Blisibimod's unique tetravalent, peptibody structure and resulting high potency, and the deliberate focus of the Phase 3 clinical development program on the 'responder populations' identified in completed trials in SLE raise the possibility that blisibimod will become an important medication for treatment of SLE and IgA nephropathy.

Off-label use of rituximab for systemic lupus erythematosus in Europe

Objectives

Rituximab (RTX) is a biological treatment used off-label in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This survey aimed to investigate the off-label use of RTX in Europe and compare the characteristics of patients receiving RTX with those receiving conventional therapy.

Methods

Data on patients with SLE receiving RTX were taken from the International Registry for Biologics in SLE retrospective registry and complemented with data on patients with SLE treated with conventional therapy. For nationwide estimates of RTX use in patients with SLE, investigators were asked to provide data through case report forms (CRFs). Countries for which no data were submitted through CRFs, published literature and/or personal communication were used, and for European countries where no data were available, estimates were made on the assumption of similarities with neighbouring countries.

Results

The estimated off-label use of RTX in Europe was 0.5%–1.5% of all patients with SLE. In comparison with patients with SLE on conventional therapy, patients treated with RTX had longer disease duration, higher disease activity and were more often treated with immunosuppressives. The most frequent organ manifestations for which either RTX or conventional therapy was initiated were lupus nephritis followed by musculoskeletal and haematological. The reason for treatment was, besides disease control, corticosteroid-sparing for patients treated with conventional therapy.

Conclusions

RTX use for SLE in Europe is restrictive and appears to be used as a last resort in patients for whom other reasonable options have been exhausted.

Success and failure of biological treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus: A critical analysis

Patients affected with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) still display increased mortality and decreased quality of life in respect to general population. The major determinant of poor long term prognosis is organ damage, which is predictive of more damage and death. Damage is in turn triggered by uncontrolled disease activity and especially by the long-standing corticosteroid use which often accompanies SLE patients over their disease course, owing both to the need of reaching disease remission and to the habit of keeping patients on a small steroid dose for an indefinite period of time. Hence, the need for new drugs and therapeutic strategies aiming at minimizing damage accrual through a better control of disease activity and a steroid-sparing potential is paramount. So far, however, the therapeutic strategy in SLE requires a multitarget approach which is not devoid of widespread immunesuppression. In fact, several studies have been carried out in recent years targeting both the adaptive and the innate immune system, the majority of which did not achieve their primary endpoint, being often divergent from successful clinical experience and thereby committing physician to off-label use of targeted therapies in face of refractory SLE manifestations. The study designs and the chosen endpoints were often blamed for inadequacy, being at least in part responsible for study failures. In this review, we go over major clinical trials conducted in SLE by analyzing any critical aspects related to study design, predefined endpoints and biological activity of novel compounds that may have hampered study outcome, despite the great effort of providing less toxic drugs within a targeted, pathogenic-based approach.