The impact of drug-related death on staff who have experienced it as part of their caseload: An exploratory study

The experience of drug-related client loss for healthcare professionals who support people in addiction

INTRODUCTION

Addiction support and recovery is a multi-faceted support context in which practitioners work with clients who present with increased mortality risks. Drug-related deaths are understood to be a risk factor for complicated grief-reactions but, to date, research has neglected to explore the intricacies of drug-related client loss for practitioners who work with clients experiencing addiction. Due to wider expectations of professional endurance and the demanding nature of health care, grief-related reactions associated with the loss of a client may go unprocessed and, therefore, result in long-term health implications.

METHOD

Fifteen health care professionals took part in individual semi-structured interviews, which were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Participants represented various disciplines in addiction support and recovery, including homelessness, inclusion health, addiction, and emergency medicine.

RESULTS

Three core themes emerged encapsulating the experience of drug-related bereavement for HCPs who support people experiencing addiction, as follows: (i) Grief Beneath the Surface, (ii) The Cost of Caring, and (iii) Finding Closure. The findings identified acute grief-related reactions in HCPs such as self-blame and shame, alongside fears of litigation and questions of clinical competency. Participants' accounts of drug-related client loss emphasized a deep professional connection with those that they work with, with grief-responses akin to the loss of peers, family members, and other close connections. The bereavement experience was complicated by unique compounding variables associated with drug-related deaths, but also by incongruity between their emotional responses to death and their professional responsibilities.

CONCLUSIONS

This article highlights the complex nature of drug-related client loss, and despite their social positioning as experts in their field, HCPs' reactions to client deaths were predominantly human responses to loss. The article identified a need for targeted postvention protocols that address complicated grief while also allowing staff to resume occupational functioning in a measured manner.

A cross sectional survey of provider experiences with patient drug overdose death

INTRODUCTION

A record number of drug overdose (OD) deaths occurred in the United States in 2021. We know little regarding the impact of patient drug OD deaths on providers within health care settings. The aim of this study was to assess provider preparedness and experience with patient drug OD death.

METHODS

The study distributed an email invitation to individuals in the Provider Clinical Support System database in December 2020 to complete an anonymous web-based survey. We used multiple choice questions to assess provider demographics, preparedness to cope with patient OD death, and experience with patient OD death. The study evaluated stress associated with patient OD death using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. We summarized responses using descriptive statistics. Associations between high stress after patient OD death and the impact of the death on clinical practice and the helpfulness of individuals and processes were assessed using Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests.

RESULTS

Among the 12,204 individuals who read the email invitation, 1064 opened the survey link, and 523 completed the survey. Participants were predominantly physicians (40.2 %) and counselors (25 %), 70 % female, 78.4 % white, with a mean age of 52 years. Among the participants 26.4 % felt at least very well prepared to cope with an OD death, and 27.7 % felt at least very well prepared to support a colleague with a patient OD death. Most respondents (55.1 %) had a history of a patient OD death. Many patient OD deaths were not discussed by providers with other colleagues, but when providers did discuss these deaths providers identified colleagues as being very helpful. Compared to providers with low stress after patient OD death, those with high levels of stress were more likely to refer patients to a higher level of care (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Many providers did not feel prepared themselves to cope with a patient OD death or support a colleague following this type of event. Patient OD deaths were a common experience, and providers did not frequently discuss their patient's deaths with others. A patient OD death can change clinical decision-making for providers experiencing high levels of stress related to the OD death.

Effects of media representations of drug related deaths on public stigma and support for harm reduction

BACKGROUND

Drug related deaths (DRD) are at historically high levels in the United Kingdom (UK), but some approaches that have the potential to reduce risk of mortality remain controversial. Public support makes an important contribution to drug policy development but there are high levels of public stigma towards people who use drugs (PWUD), and this is partly shaped by media representations. We investigated whether depiction of the characteristics of decedents represented in news articles about DRD was associated with differences in stigmatising attitudes and support for harm reduction policy.

METHODS

We undertook a cross-sectional online study with a randomised design, conducted with a nationally representative sample (UK). Participants (N = 1280) were randomly presented with one of eight simulated news stories that reported on a DRD that differed with respect to drug (ecstasy or heroin), and the gender (male or female) and age (younger or older) of the decedent. Data were analysed using MANOVA.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 1248 participants (51.0% female; mean age 45.7±15.4). Stigma was higher towards depictions of male, older, and heroin deaths (all p < .001). Harm reduction support was higher in those participants seeing older compared to younger subjects (p = .035), and the older ecstasy decedent compared to younger decedent (p = .029).

CONCLUSION

Presentation of some types of DRD are associated with higher public stigma towards the decedent than others. Those groups developing agenda-setting activities designed to reduce stigma or foster public support for harm reduction policies should consider the different ways in which audiences may respond to the depiction and framing of DRD in news media.

Reducing drug related deaths: a pre-implementation assessment of knowledge, barriers and enablers for naloxone distribution through general practice

Background

The Scottish Naloxone Programme aims to reduce Scotland’s high number of drug-related deaths (DRDs) caused by opiate overdose. It is currently implemented through specialist drug services but General Practitioners (GPs) are likely to have contact with drug using patients and their families and are therefore in an ideal position to direct them to naloxone schemes, or provide it themselves. This research gathered baseline data on GP’s knowledge of and willingness to be involved in DRD prevention, including naloxone administration, prior to the implementation of primary care based delivery.

Methods

Mixed methods were used comprising a quantitative, postal survey and qualitative telephone interviews. A questionnaire was sent to 500 GPs across Scotland. An initial mailing was followed by a reminder. A shortened questionnaire containing seven key questions was posted as a final reminder. Telephone interviews were conducted with 17 GPs covering a range of demographic characteristics and drug user experience.

Results

A response rate of 55% (240/439) was achieved. There was some awareness of the naloxone programme but little involvement (3.3%), 9% currently provided routine overdose prevention, there was little involvement in displaying overdose prevention information (<20%). Knowledge of DRD risk was mixed. There was tentative willingness to be involved in naloxone prescribing with half of respondents willing to provide this to drug users or friends/family. However half were uncertain GP based naloxone provision was essential to reduce DRDs.

Factors enabling naloxone distribution were: evidence of effectiveness, appropriate training, and adding to the local formulary. Interviewees had limited awareness of what naloxone distribution in primary care may involve and considered naloxone supply as a specialist service rather than a core GP role. Wider attitudinal barriers to involvement with this group were expressed.

Conclusions

There was poor awareness of the Scottish National Naloxone Programme in participants. Results indicated GPs did not currently feel sufficiently skilled or knowledgeable to be involved in naloxone provision. Appropriate training was identified as a key requirement.