Kinetic studies on the major form of aldehyde reductase in ox kidney: a general kinetic mechanism to explain substrate-dependent mechanisms and the inhibition by anticonvulsants

Crystal structure of an aldehyde reductase Y50F mutant-NADP complex and its implications for substrate binding

Pig aldehyde reductase containing the active site mutation tyrosine(50) to phenylalanine has been crystallized in the presence of the cofactor NADP(H) to a resolution of 2.2 A. This structure clearly shows loss of the tyrosine hydroxyl group and no other significant perturbations compared with previously determined structures. The mutant binds cofactor (both oxidized and reduced) more tightly than the wild-type enzyme but shows a complete lack of binding of the aldehyde reductase inhibitor barbitone, as determined by fluorescence titrations. Numerous attempts at preparing a ternary complex with a range of small aldehyde substrates were unsuccessful. This result, in addition to the inability of the mutant protein to bind the inhibitor, provides strong evidence for the proposal that the tyrosine hydroxyl group is essential for substrate binding in addition to catalysis.

The crystal structure of an aldehyde reductase Y50F mutant-NADP complex and its implications for substrate binding

In order to understand more fully the structural features of aldo-keto reductases (AKRs) that determine their substrate specificities it would be desirable to obtain crystal structures of an AKR with a substrate at the active site. Unfortunately the reaction mechanism does not allow a binary complex between enzyme and substrate and to date ternary complexes of enzyme, NADP(H) and substrate or product have not been achieved. Previous crystal structures, in conjunction with numerous kinetic and theoretical analyses, have led to the general acceptance of the active site tyrosine as the general acid-base catalytic residue in the enzyme. This view is supported by the generation of an enzymatically inactive site-directed mutant (tyrosine-48 to phenylalanine) in human aldose reductase [AKR1B1]. However, crystallization of this mutant was unsuccessful. We have attempted to generate a trapped cofactor/substrate complex in pig aldehyde reductase [AKR1A2] using a tyrosine 50 to phenylalanine site-directed mutant. We have been successful in the generation of the first high resolution binary AKR-Y50F:NADP(H) crystal structure, but we were unable to generate any ternary complexes. The binary complex was refined to 2.2A and shows a clear lack of density due to the missing hydroxyl group. Other residues in the active site are not significantly perturbed when compared to other available reductase structures. The mutant binds cofactor (both oxidized and reduced) more tightly but shows a complete lack of binding of the aldehyde reductase inhibitor barbitone as determined by fluorescence titrations. Attempts at substrate addition to the active site, either by cocrystallization or by soaking, were all unsuccessful using pyridine-3-aldehyde, 4-carboxybenzaldehyde, succinic semialdehyde, methylglyoxal, and other substrates. The lack of ternary complex formation, combined with the significant differences in the binding of barbitone provides some experimental proof of the proposal that the hydroxyl group on the active site tyrosine is essential for substrate binding in addition to its major role in catalysis. We propose that the initial event in catalysis is the binding of the oxygen moiety of the carbonyl-group of the substrate through hydrogen bonding to the tyrosine hydroxyl group.

Kinetic characteristics of ZENECA ZD5522, a potent inhibitor of human and bovine lens aldose reductase

Aldose reductase (aldehyde reductase 2) catalyses the conversion of glucose to sorbitol, and methylglyoxal to acetol. Treatment with aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) is a potential approach to decrease the development of diabetic complications. The sulphonylnitromethanes are a recently discovered class of aldose reductase inhibitors, first exemplified by ICI215918. We now describe enzyme kinetic characterization of a second sulphonylnitromethane, 3',5'-dimethyl-4'-nitromethylsulphonyl-2-(2-tolyl)acetanilide (ZD5522), which is at least 10-fold more potent against bovine lens aldose reductase in vitro and which also has a greater efficacy for reduction of rat nerve sorbitol levels in vivo (ED95 = 2.8 mg kg-1 for ZD5522 and 20 mg kg-1 for ICI 215918). ZD5522 follows pure noncompetitive kinetics against bovine lens aldose reductase when either glucose or methylglyoxal is varied (K(is) = K(ii) = 7.2 and 4.3 nM, respectively). This contrasts with ICI 215918 which is an uncompetitive inhibitor (K(ii) = 100 nM) of bovine lens aldose reductase when glucose is varied. Against human recombinant aldose reductase, ZD5522 displays mixed noncompetitive kinetics with respect to both substrates (K(is) = 41 nM, K(ii) = 8 nM with glucose and K(is) = 52 nM, K(ii) = 3.8 nM with methylglyoxal). This is the first report of the effects of a sulphonylnitromethane on either human aldose reductase or utilization of methylglyoxal. These results are discussed with reference to a Di Iso Ordered Bi Bi mechanism for aldose reductase, where the inhibitors compete with binding of both the aldehyde substrate and alcohol product. This model may explain why aldose reductase inhibitors follow noncompetitive or uncompetitive kinetics with respect to aldehyde substrates, and X-ray crystallography paradoxically locates an ARI within the substrate binding site. Aldehyde reductase (aldehyde reductase 1) is closely related to aldose reductase. Inhibition of bovine kidney aldehyde reductase by ZD5522 follows uncompetitive kinetics with respect to glucuronate (K(ii) = 39 nM), indicating a selectivity greater than 5-fold for bovine aldose reductase relative to aldehyde reductase.

Inhibition of aldose reductase by (2,6-dimethylphenylsulphonyl)nitromethane: possible implications for the nature of an inhibitor binding site and a cause of biphasic kinetics

Aldose reductase (aldehyde reductase 2, ALR2) is often isolated as a mixture of two forms which are sensitive (ALR2S), or insensitive (ALR2I), to inhibitors. We show that ICI 215918 ((2-6-dimethylphenylsulphonyl)-nitromethane) follows either noncompetitive, or uncompetitive kinetics with respect to aldehyde for ALR2S, or the closely related enzyme, aldehyde reductase (aldehyde reductase 1, ALR1). Similar behaviour is exhibited by two other structural types of aldose reductase inhibitor (ARI), spirohydantoins and acetic acids, when either aldehyde, or NADPH is varied. For ALR2S, we have demonstrated kinetic competition between a sulphonylnitromethane, an acetic acid and a spirohydantoin. Thus, different ARIs probably have overlapping binding sites. Published studies imply that ALR2 follows an ordered mechanism where coenzyme binds first and induces a reversible conformation change (E.NADPH-->E*.NADPH). Reduction of aldehyde appears rate-limited by the step E*.NADP+-->E.NADP+. Spontaneous activation converts ALR2S into ALR2I and increases kcat. This must be associated with acceleration of the rate-determining step. We now propose the following hypothesis to explain characteristics of ARIs. (1) Inhibitors preferentially bind to the E* conformation. (2) The ARI binding site contains residues in common with that for aldehyde substrates. When aldehyde is varied, uncompetitive inhibition arises from association at the site for alcohol product in the E*.NADP+ complex which has little affinity for the substrate. Any competitive inhibition arises from use of the aldehyde site in the E*.NADPH complex. (3) Acceleration of the E*.NADP+-->E.NADP+ step upon activation of ALR2 reduces steady state levels of E* and so decreases sensitivity to ARIs.