Predictive factors for neonatal survival in women with periviable preterm rupture of the membranes

Outcome of prelabor rupture of membranes before or at the limit of viability: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Counseling of pregnancies complicated by pre- and periviable premature rupture of membranes to reach shared decision-making is challenging, and the current limited evidence hampers the robustness of the information provided. This study aimed to elucidate the rate of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes after expectant management for premature rupture of membranes occurring before or at the limit of viability.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched electronically up to September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Our study included both prospective and retrospective studies of singleton pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes before and at the limit of viability (ie, occurring between 14 0/7 and 24 6/7 weeks of gestation).

METHODS

Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Moreover, our study used meta-analyses of proportions to combine data and reported pooled proportions. Given the clinical heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used to compute the pooled data analyses. This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (registration number: CRD42022368029).

RESULTS

The pooled proportion of termination of pregnancy was 32.3%. After the exclusion of cases of termination of pregnancy, the rate of spontaneous miscarriage or fetal demise was 20.1%, whereas the rate of live birth was 65.9%. The mean gestational age at delivery among the live-born cases was 27.3 weeks, and the mean latency between premature rupture of membranes and delivery was 39.4 days. The pooled proportion of cesarean deliveries was 47.9% of the live-born cases. Oligohydramnios occurred in 47.1% of cases. Chorioamnionitis occurred in 33.4% of cases, endometritis in 7.0%, placental abruption in 9.2%, and postpartum hemorrhage in 5.3%. Hysterectomy was necessary in 1.2% of cases. Maternal sepsis occurred in 1.5% of cases, whereas no maternal death was reported in the included studies. When focusing on neonatal outcomes, the mean birthweight was 1022.8 g in live-born cases. The neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was 86.3%, respiratory distress syndrome was diagnosed in 66.5% of cases, pulmonary hypoplasia or dysplasia was diagnosed in 24.0% of cases, and persistent pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed in 40.9% of cases. Of the surviving neonates, the other neonatal complications included necrotizing enterocolitis in 11.1%, retinopathy of prematurity in 27.1%, and intraventricular hemorrhage in 17.5%. Neonatal sepsis occurred in 30.2% of cases, and the overall neonatal mortality was 23.9%. The long-term follow-up at 2 to 4 years was normal in 74.1% of the available cases.

CONCLUSION

Premature rupture of membranes before or at the limit of viability was associated with a great burden of both obstetrical and neonatal complications, with an impaired long-term follow-up at 2 to 4 years in almost 30% of cases, representing a clinical challenge for both counseling and management. Our data are useful when initially approaching such patients to offer the most comprehensive possible scenario on short- and long-term outcomes of this condition and to help parents in shared decision-making. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes after first-trimester chorionic villus sampling: A case report and review of the literature

Rupture of membranes in the first trimester is extremely rare. Generally at this gestational age, rupture is a complication of invasive genetic testing. Little is known about the complications or sequelae of such an occurrence and therefore the management options are limited. This article reports the case of a 35-year-old woman who had rupture of membranes after chorionic villus sampling in the first trimester; it describes her pregnancy course and eventual positive outcome. Regardless of gestational age at time of fluid loss, treatment options are limited. This article reviews the evidence regarding first-trimester rupture and the outcomes of expectant management.

Association of Endometriosis and Severe Maternal Morbidity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between endometriosis and risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 2,412,823 deliveries at hospitals in Quebec, Canada, between 1989 and 2019. The exposure was surgically confirmed endometriosis. Patients were classified as having active endometriosis during pregnancy, inactive endometriosis during pregnancy, a diagnosis of endometriosis postpregnancy, or no endometriosis. The outcome was SMM, including by a range of life-threatening maternal conditions during pregnancy or up to 42 days postdelivery. We computed rates of SMM and used log binomial regression to assess the association with endometriosis (risk ratio [RR]; 95% CI), adjusted for maternal characteristics.

RESULTS

Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 46.2 of 1,000 patients with endometriosis, compared with 30.7 of 1,000 patients without endometriosis. Relative to no exposure, endometriosis was associated with 1.43 times the risk of SMM (95% CI 1.36-1.51). Patients with endometriosis that was active during pregnancy had a greater risk of SMM (RR 1.93; 95% CI 1.76-2.11). Active endometriosis was associated with the risk of severe preeclampsia and eclampsia, severe hemorrhage, hysterectomy, cardiac complications, embolism, shock, sepsis, and intensive care unit admission. Inactive endometriosis was less strongly associated with these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant patients with endometriosis, especially active endometriosis, have a greater risk of SMM and may benefit from closer follow-up to prevent severe complications of pregnancy.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in midtrimester rupture of membranes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes following expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 18 and 26 weeks and to identify maternal morbidity and prognostic factors for neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

Data were collected from all pregnant women who presented PPROM between 18⁺⁰ and 26⁺⁰ weeks admitted into two tertiary centers in Brazil from 2005 to 2016. The neonatal adverse outcomes (mortality or the development of a severe morbidity) and maternal adverse outcomes were analyzed and compared among four groups (18^0/7 to 20^0/7 weeks, 20⁺¹ to 22^0/7 weeks, 22⁺¹ to 24^0/7 weeks and 24⁺¹ to 26^0/7 weeks). A multiple logistic regression was performed for each predictor of neonatal adverse outcomes, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for birth weight and gestational age at birth were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 101 women with PPROM during the study period, 97 fulfilled the eligible criteria. Among these patients, 30 (30.9%) had a miscarriage or stillbirth. Overall there were 67/97 (69.1%) livebirths, 45/97 newborns survived to discharge (46.3%), and 53/97 (54.6%) experienced severe neonatal adverse outcome. The median latency period was seven days, with 36 (37.1%) patients ending the pregnancy in 2-14 days. Among 29 patients with PPROM at 24⁺¹ to 26^0/7 weeks, only 13 (44.8%) delivered between 2 and 14 days. Multivariate analysis has demonstrated that the independent predictor for adverse neonatal outcome was birthweight. The maternal morbidity was high; however, the expectant management did not increase the rate of severe maternal morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

PPROM between 18⁺⁰ and 26⁺⁰ weeks has high morbidity and mortality, and the only significant independent predictor of severe adverse neonatal outcomes is birthweight. Maternal morbidity is high, however, the expectant management is not increased by expectant management.

[Antenatal management in case of preterm premature rupture of membranes before fetal viability: CNGOF Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes Guidelines]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the maternal, perinatal and long-term prognosis in the event of previable premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) and to specify the interventions likely to reduce the risks and improve the prognosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted.

RESULTS

Previable PROM is a rare event whose frequency varies from 0.3 to 1% according to estimates (NP4). When occurring as a complication of amniocentesis, the prognosis is generally better than when spontaneous (NP3). Between 23 and 39% of women will deliver in the week following PROM and nearly 40% of women will not have given birth 2 weeks after (NP3). The frequency of medical termination of pregnancy varies greatly according to the studies (NP4), as does that of fetal death (NP4). Hospital survival and survival rates without major morbidity as a proportion of conservatively treated patients range from 17-55% and 26-63%, respectively (NP4). Neonatal prognosis is largely dominated by prematurity and its complications (NP3). The frequency of maternal sepsis varies from 0.8 to 4.8% in the most recent studies (NP4). Only one case of maternal death is reported, although 3 cases were identified in France between 2007 and 2012 (NP3). Information is a major component of the care to be provided to women and their partners (Professional consensus). An initial period of hospitalization may be proposed after previable PROM (Professional consensus). Thereafter, there is no argument to recommend hospital management rather than extra-hospital management when there is no argument in favour of intrauterine infection (Professional consensus). An evaluation of the amount of amniotic fluid by ultrasound may be proposed at the initial consultation and after a period of 7 to 14 days if pregnancy continues (Professional consensus). Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is recommended as soon as PROM is diagnosed (Professional consensus). The gestational age at which corticosteroid therapy may be proposed will depend on the thresholds selected for neonatal resuscitation care. In particular, it will take into account parental positioning (Professional consensus). From the time of the decision to perform neonatal resuscitation until the gestational age of 32 weeks, it is recommended to administer MgSO₄ to the woman whose delivery is imminent (Grade A). Tocolysis is not recommended in this context (Professional consensus). In certain situations, meeting strictly the conditions mentioned by the CSP article L. 2213-1, a maternal request for medical interruption of pregnancy may be discussed.

CONCLUSION

The levels of evidence of scientific work on the management of previable PROM are low, therefore, most of the recommendations proposed here are based on professional agreement by "reasonable" extension of recommendations valid for later gestational ages.

Outcomes in oligohydramnios: the role of etiology in predicting pulmonary morbidity/mortality

Objective Early-onset oligohydramnios is typically secondary to renal-urinary anomalies (RUA) or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). We compared neonatal pulmonary outcomes between these etiologies. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with oligohydramnios identified before 24 completed weeks of gestation attributed to either PPROM or RUA. Patients were excluded if other fetal anomalies were noted. Respiratory morbidity was assessed by the need for oxygen at 36 corrected weeks or at hospital discharge. Results Of 116 eligible patients, 54 chose elective pregnancy termination. A total of 39.5% of PPROM (n=17/43) and 36.8% of RUA (n=7/19) pregnancies experienced pre-viable loss (P=1.00). Significantly fewer PPROM live births resulted in neonatal mortality (26.9% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). There was no difference in respiratory morbidity (57.9% vs. 66.6%, P=1.00). The collective incidence of respiratory mortality and morbidity was not different between etiologies (P=0.06). Conclusion This analysis suggests that the prognoses for oligohydramnios due to pre-viable PPROM vs. renal anomalies are similarly grave, though RUA infants experienced a higher rate of neonatal respiratory mortality.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes following expectant management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes before viability

Purpose: To provide center-based outcome data on obstetric and neonatal complications arising from expectantly managed pregnancies affected by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) before viability.Materials and methods: We collected data on 130 consecutive pregnancies complicated by spontaneous rupture of membranes before 24 week's gestation, occurring over a 7-year period. These were women who delivered >24 h after membrane rupture, and had no signs of chorioamnionitis or advanced labor at admission. Women with amniocentesis-induced PPROM (n = 7) were analyzed separately. The descriptive statistics of obstetrics and neonatal outcomes were reported.Results: The overall neonatal survival to discharge rate was 33.8%. Stratification of patients into early (12 to 19⁺⁶ weeks' gestation) and late pre-viable PPROM (20 to 23⁺⁶ weeks' gestation) revealed a 3.6-fold increase in survival rate in the latter group (12.2% versus 43.8%, p < .001). Pre-viable PPROM following amniocentesis predicted a 100% survival outcome, however anhydramnios impacted negatively. The most common neonatal morbidities of those admitted to intensive care unit were respiratory distress syndrome (78.7%) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (84.4%). The most common maternal morbidities affecting pre-viable PPROM were clinical chorioamnionitis (47.7%), histological chorioamnionitis (81.8%), retained products of conception (39.3%) and preterm labor (45.4%).Conclusions: Later gestational ages at PPROM were associated with better survival rates, however neonatal morbidity remained high. Women experiencing pre-viable PPROM following amniocentesis can be reassured, while those with anhydramnios at any time during the latency period should be adequately counseled regarding poorer outcomes.

Outcomes of hypoxic respiratory failure at birth associated with previable rupture of membranes

OBJECTIVE

To characterize clinical outcomes of infants born after previable rupture of membranes (pROM, < 23 weeks gestation and latency period ≥ 2 weeks) in relation to refractory hypoxic respiratory failure (rHRF).

STUDY DESIGN

pROM neonates categorized as rHRF (FiO₂ > 0.6 for ≥ 2 h) and treated (high frequency ventilation + inhaled nitric oxide) were compared with no rHRF group. Primary outcome was survival until discharge. Factors associated with rHRF and mortality were identified.

RESULT

Overall, mortality and disability rates were 28% and 22%, respectively. Treated rHRF group (n = 32) had longer period of ROM, mortality was (31% vs. 14%; p = 0.20), with similar survival-without-disability (54% vs. 47%; p = 0.67). Higher gestational age at birth [1.57 (1.03,2.39)] and cesarean delivery [12.6 (1.22,125)] were associated with increased survival.

CONCLUSION

Birth after pROM is associated with high rates of adverse outcomes, independent of latency period. Following treatment, rHRF infants may have similar long-term outcomes as those without rHRF.

A predictive neonatal mortality score for women with premature rupture of membranes after 22-27 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE

Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity. The objectives of the present study were to analyze the outcomes of pregnancies complicated by PROM between 22 and 27⁺⁶ weeks of gestation (WG) and to study antepartum risk factors that might predict neonatal death.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and seven pregnancies were analyzed over a 3-year period in a tertiary maternity hospital. The collected maternal and neonatal data were used to model and predict the outcome of PROM.

RESULTS

Prevalence of PROM (for live births) was 1.08%, and the overall survival rate was 59.8%. From preselected candidate variables, gestational age (GA) at PROM (p = .0002), a positive vaginal culture for pathogenic bacteria (p = .01), primiparity (p = .02), and the quantity of amniotic fluid (p = .03) were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The corresponding adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence interval] were, respectively, 0.91 [0.87-0.96], 11.08 [1.65-74.42], 0.55 [0.33-0.91], and 0.97 [0.95-0.99]. These parameters were used to build a predictive score for neonatal death.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rate after PROM at 22-27⁺⁶ weeks of gestation was 59.8%. Our predictive model (built using multivariable logistic regression) may be of value for obstetricians and neonatologists counseling couples after PROM.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes following expectant management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes before viability

AIM

To assess the contemporary maternal and neonatal outcomes following expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) prior to 24 weeks' gestation and to identify prognostic indicators of this morbid presentation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in the Pubmed and EMBASE databases to identify the primary (perinatal mortality, severe neonatal morbidity and serious maternal morbidity) and secondary (neonatal survival and morbidity) outcomes following expectant management of previable PPROM.

RESULTS

Mean latency between PPROM and delivery ranged between 20 and 43 days. Women with PPROM <24 weeks had an overall live birth rate of 63.6% and a survival-to-discharge rate of 44.9%. The common neonatal morbidities were respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and sepsis. The majority of neonatal deaths within 24 h post birth were associated with pulmonary hypoplasia, severe intraventricular haemorrhage and neonatal sepsis. The common maternal outcomes were chorioamnionitis and caesarean sections. The major predictors of neonatal survival were later gestational age at PPROM, adequate residual amniotic fluid levels, C-reactive protein <1 mg/dL within 24 h of admission and PPROM after invasive procedures.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy latency and neonatal survival following previable PPROM has improved in recent years, although neonatal morbidity remains unchanged despite recent advances in obstetric and neonatal care. There is heterogeneity in management practices across centres worldwide.

Neonatal outcomes after prelabour rupture of membranes before 24 weeks' gestation

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) before 24 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of medical records over a 5-year period (2007-2011) at Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Australia. Data relating to the antenatal and perinatal course of pregnancies complicated by PROM before 24 weeks' gestation were collected. Data were also collected on neonatal diagnoses, management and outcomes for all liveborn infants resulting from these pregnancies.

RESULTS

One hundred and six pregnancies were complicated by PROM before 24 weeks' gestation. Thirty-three (31%) of these pregnancies resulted in delivery at pre-viable gestations (<23 weeks). There were 36 (37%) infants who survived to hospital discharge. At discharge, 47% of infants had chronic lung disease, with 81% of this group requiring supplemental oxygen at home.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-third of pregnancies complicated by PROM before 24 weeks resulted in pre-viable preterm delivery. In pregnancies continuing to a viable gestation, there remained a significant risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity, primarily due to respiratory disease.

A new antibiotic regimen treats and prevents intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients with preterm PROM

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a new antibiotic regimen could reduce the frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients with preterm PROM.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the effect of antibiotics on the frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection based on the results of follow-up transabdominal amniocenteses from 89 patients diagnosed with preterm PROM who underwent serial amniocenteses. From 1993-2003, ampicillin and/or cephalosporins or a combination was used ("regimen 1"). A new regimen (ceftriaxone, clarithromycin and metronidazole) was used from 2003-2012 ("regimen 2"). Amniotic fluid was cultured and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

(1) The rates of intra-amniotic inflammation and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients who received regimen 2 decreased during treatment from 68.8% to 52.1% and from 75% to 54.2%, respectively. In contrast, in patients who received regimen 1, the frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation and infection/inflammation increased during treatment (31.7% to 55% and 34.1% to 58.5%, respectively); and (2) intra-amniotic inflammation/infection was eradicated in 33.3% of patients who received regimen 2, but in none who received regimen 1.

CONCLUSION

The administration of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin and metronidazole was associated with a more successful eradication of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection and prevented secondary intra-amniotic inflammation/infection more frequently than an antibiotic regimen which included ampicillin and/or cephalosporins in patients with preterm PROM.

A point of care test for the determination of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and the chemokine CXCL-10/IP-10

OBJECTIVE

Intra-amniotic inflammation is a mechanism of disease implicated in preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membrane, cervical insufficiency, a short cervix, and idiopathic vaginal bleeding. Determination of interleukin (IL)-6 with immunoassays has been proven for more than two decades to be an excellent method for the detection of intra-amniotic inflammation. However, assessment of IL-6 for this indication has been based on immunoassays which are not clinically available, and this has been an obstacle for the implementation of this test in clinical practice. It is now possible to obtain results within 20 min with a point of care (POC) test which requires minimal laboratory support. This test is based on lateral flow-based immunoassay. The objective of this study was to compare amniotic fluid (AF) IL-6 and interferon-γ - inducible protein 10 (IP-10 or CXCL-10) concentrations determined using lateral flow-based immunoassay or POC test and standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

AF samples were collected from patients with singleton gestations and symptoms of preterm labor (n = 20). AF IL-6 and IP-10 concentrations were determined by lateral flow-based immunoassay and ELISA. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as AF IL-6 ≥ 2.6 ng/ml. AF IL-6 and IP-10 concentrations between two assays were compared.

RESULTS

(1) Lateral flow-based immunoassay POC AF IL-6 and IP-10 test results were strongly correlated with concentrations of this cytokine/chemokine determined by ELISA (Spearman's ρ = 0.92 and 0.83, respectively, both p < 0.0001); (2) AF IL-6 concentrations determined by the lateral flow-based immunoassay test were, on average, 30% lower than those determined by ELISA, and the median difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001); and (3) in contrast, AF IP-10 concentrations determined by the lateral flow-based immunoassay test were, on average, only 7% lower than those determined by ELISA, and the median difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

AF IL-6 and IP-10 concentrations determined using a lateral flow-based immunoassay POC are strongly correlated with concentrations determined by conventional ELISA. This justifies further studies about the diagnostic indices and predictive values of this POC test.

A point of care test for interleukin-6 in amniotic fluid in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a step toward the early treatment of acute intra-amniotic inflammation/infection

OBJECTIVE

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (preterm PROM) accounts for 30-40% of spontaneous preterm deliveries and thus is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality. An amniotic fluid (AF) interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration is a key cytokine for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation, patients at risk of impending preterm delivery and adverse pregnancy complications. The conventional method to determine IL-6 concentrations in AF is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, this technique is not available in clinical settings, and the results may take several days. A lateral flow-based immunoassay, or point of care (POC) test, has been developed to address this issue. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of AF IL-6 determined by the POC test to that determined by ELISA for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm PROM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes 56 women with singleton pregnancies who presented with preterm PROM. Amniocentesis was performed at the time of diagnosis, and AF was analyzed using cultivation techniques for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as genital mycoplasmas. AF Gram stain and AF white blood cell counts were determined. AF IL-6 concentrations were measured using both lateral flow-based immunoassay and ELISA. The primary outcome was intra-amniotic inflammation defined as AF ELISA IL-6 ≥ 2600 pg/ml. A previously determined cut-off of 745 pg/ml was used to define a positive POC test.

RESULTS

(1) The POC test for AF IL-6 concentrations had 97% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation, as defined using ELISA among patients with preterm PROM and (2) the diagnostic performance of the POC test for IL-6 was strongly correlated to that of an ELISA test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation and was equivalent for the identification of acute inflammatory placental lesions and microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC).

CONCLUSION

A POC AF IL-6 test can identify intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm PROM. Results can be available within 20 min - this makes it possible to implement interventions designed to treat intra-amniotic inflammation and improve pregnancy outcomes.