1
|
Clausen FB, Lundquist AA, Urhammer E, Nielsen LK, Rieneck K. Simple formula for adjusted performance parameters in evaluation of diagnostic methods. Transfusion 2024. [PMID: 39145495 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alberte Aspaas Lundquist
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emil Urhammer
- Department of Sustainability and Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Leif Kofoed Nielsen
- Department of Technology, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Rieneck
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clausen FB. Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women. Immunohematology 2024; 40:15-27. [PMID: 38739027 DOI: 10.2478/immunohematology-2024-004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik B Clausen
- Laboratory of Blood Genetics, Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shear MA, Swanson K, Garg R, Jelin AC, Boscardin J, Norton ME, Sparks TN. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cell-free DNA testing for detection of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:133-143. [PMID: 36588186 PMCID: PMC10268789 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was to determine the accuracy of cell-free DNA testing (cfDNA) for detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) in singleton pregnancies. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess cfDNA accuracy for prenatal detection of 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX and 47,XYY. Inclusion was restricted to studies published between January 2010 and December 2021 reporting both cfDNA and confirmatory diagnostic test results. RESULTS For 45,X, the sensitivity was 98.8% (95%CI 94.6%-100%), specificity 99.4% (95%CI 98.7%-99.9%) and positive predictive value (PPV) 14.5% (95%CI 7.0%-43.8%). For 47,XXY, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 99.6%-100%), specificity 100% (95%CI 99.9%-100%) and PPV 97.7% (95%CI 78.6%-100%). For 47,XXX, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 96.9%-100%), specificity 99.9% (95%CI 99.7%-100%) and PPV 61.6% (95%CI 37.6%-95.4%). For 47,XYY, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 91.3%-100%), specificity 100% (95% CI 100%-100%) and PPV 100% (95%CI 76.5%-100%). All four SCAs had estimated negative predictive values (NPV) exceeding 99.99%, though false negatives were reported. CONCLUSIONS This analysis suggests that cfDNA is a reliable screening test for SCA, though both false negatives and false positives were reported. These estimates of test performance are derived from pregnancies at high pretest risk for aneuploidy, limiting the generalisability to average risk pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Shear
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kate Swanson
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ria Garg
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Angie C. Jelin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John Boscardin
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mary E. Norton
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Maternal Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Teresa N. Sparks
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Maternal Fetal Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pacault M, Verebi C, Champion M, Orhant L, Perrier A, Girodon E, Leturcq F, Vidaud D, Férec C, Bienvenu T, Daveau R, Nectoux J. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders with enhanced relative haplotype dosage analysis for diagnostic implementation. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280976. [PMID: 37093806 PMCID: PMC10124834 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of single-gene disorders (SGD-NIPD) has been widely accepted, but is mostly limited to the exclusion of either paternal or de novo mutations. Indeed, it is still difficult to infer the inheritance of the maternal allele from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. Based on the study of maternal haplotype imbalance in cfDNA, relative haplotype dosage (RHDO) was developed to address this challenge. Although RHDO has been shown to be reliable, robust control of statistical error and explicit delineation of critical parameters for assessing the quality of the analysis have not been fully addressed. We present here a universal and adaptable enhanced-RHDO (eRHDO) procedure through an automated bioinformatics pipeline with a didactic visualization of the results, aiming to be applied for any SGD-NIPD in routine care. A training cohort of 43 families carrying CFTR, NF1, DMD, or F8 mutations allowed the characterization and optimal setting of several adjustable data variables, such as minimum sequencing depth, type 1 and type 2 statistical errors, as well as the quality assessment of intermediate steps and final results by block score and concordance score. Validation was successfully performed on a test cohort of 56 pregnancies. Finally, computer simulations were used to estimate the effect of fetal-fraction, sequencing depth and number of informative SNPs on the quality of results. Our workflow proved to be robust, as we obtained conclusive and correctly inferred fetal genotypes in 94.9% of cases, with no false-negative or false-positive results. By standardizing data generation and analysis, we fully describe a turnkey protocol for laboratories wishing to offer eRHDO-based non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene disorders as an alternative to conventional prenatal diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Pacault
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire et Histocompatibilité, Brest, France
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Camille Verebi
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | | | - Lucie Orhant
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Perrier
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Girodon
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - France Leturcq
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Vidaud
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Claude Férec
- Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire et Histocompatibilité, Brest, France
| | - Thierry Bienvenu
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Romain Daveau
- MOABI, Plateforme bio-informatique AP-HP, Département I&D, DSI, Paris, France
| | - Juliette Nectoux
- Service de Médecine Génomique des maladies de système et d'organe, APHP.Centre - Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clausen FB, Hellberg Å, Bein G, Bugert P, Schwartz D, Drnovsek TD, Finning K, Guz K, Haimila K, Henny C, O’Brien H, Orzinska A, Sørensen K, Thorlacius S, Wikman A, Denomme GA, Flegel WA, Gassner C, de Haas M, Hyland C, Ji Y, Lane WJ, Nogués N, Olsson ML, Peyrard T, van der Schoot CE, Weinstock C, Legler T. Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations. Vox Sang 2022; 117:157-165. [PMID: 34155647 PMCID: PMC10686716 DOI: 10.1111/vox.13172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors. RESULTS In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed. CONCLUSION These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Banch Clausen
- Laboratory of Blood Genetics, Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Åsa Hellberg
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Sweden
| | - Gregor Bein
- Institute for Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Peter Bugert
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Mannheim, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden Württemberg – Hessen, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dieter Schwartz
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Kirstin Finning
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, UK
| | - Katarzyna Guz
- Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Helen O’Brien
- Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten Sørensen
- Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Agneta Wikman
- Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Karolinska University Hospital and CLINTEC Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gregory Andrew Denomme
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Versiti Blood Research Institute and Diagnostic Laboratories, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Willy Albert Flegel
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christoph Gassner
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein
| | - Masja de Haas
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunohaematology Diagnostic Services, Sanquin Diagnostic Services and Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Catherine Hyland
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yanli Ji
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Guangzhou Blood Center, Institute of Clinical Blood Transfusion, Guangzhou, China
| | - William J. Lane
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Núria Nogués
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Immunohematology Laboratory, Blood and Tissue Bank, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Martin L. Olsson
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Sweden
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Thierry Peyrard
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine, Centre National de Référence pour les Groupes Sanguins, Paris, France
| | - C. Ellen van der Schoot
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christof Weinstock
- cfDNA subgroup from the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Red Cell Immunogenetics and Blood Group Terminology (RCIBGT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, and Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tobias Legler
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dziegiel MH, Krog GR, Hansen AT, Olsen M, Lausen B, Nørgaard LN, Bergholt T, Rieneck K, Clausen FB. Laboratory Monitoring of Mother, Fetus, and Newborn in Hemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn. Transfus Med Hemother 2021; 48:306-315. [PMID: 34803574 DOI: 10.1159/000518782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laboratory monitoring of mother, fetus, and newborn in hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN) aims to guide clinicians and the immunized women to focus on the most serious problems of alloimmunization and thus minimize the consequences of HDFN in general and of anti-D in particular. Here, we present the current approach of laboratory screening and testing for prevention and monitoring of HDFN at the Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark. Summary All pregnant women are typed and screened in the 1st trimester. This serves to identify the RhD-negative pregnant women who at gestational age (GA) of 25 weeks are offered a second screen test and a non-invasive fetal RhD prediction. At GA 29 weeks, and again after delivery, non-immunized RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus are offered Rh immunoglobulin. If the 1st trimester screen reveals an alloantibody, antenatal investigation is initiated. This also includes RhD-positive women with alloantibodies. Specificity and titer are determined, the fetal phenotype is predicted by non-invasive genotyping based on cell-free DNA (RhD, K, Rhc, RhC, RhE, ABO), and serial monitoring of titer commences. Based on titers and specificity, monitoring with serial peak systolic velocity measurements in the fetal middle cerebral artery to detect anemia will take place. Intrauterine transfusion is given when fetal anemia is suspected. Monitoring of the newborn by titer and survival of fetal red blood cells by flow cytometry will help predict the length of the recovery of the newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Hanefeld Dziegiel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Grethe Risum Krog
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Todsen Hansen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Olsen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Lausen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lone Nikoline Nørgaard
- Department of Obstetrics, Center of Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Bergholt
- Department of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus Rieneck
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Frederik Banch Clausen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diagnostic performance of the noninvasive prenatal FetoGnost RhD assay for the prediction of the fetal RhD blood group status. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 304:1191-1196. [PMID: 33835210 PMCID: PMC8490250 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06055-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available test kit for noninvasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status (NIPT-RhD) with a focus on early gestation and multiple pregnancies. Methods The FetoGnost RhD assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) is routinely applied for clinical decision making either in woman with anti-D alloimmunization or to target the application of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to women with a RhD positive fetus. Based on existing data in the laboratory information system the newborn’s serological RhD status was compared with NIPT RhD results. Results Since 2009 NIPT RhD was performed in 2968 pregnant women between weeks 5 + 6 and 40 + 0 of gestation (median 12 + 6) and conclusive results were obtained in 2888 (97.30%) cases. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated from those 2244 (77.70%) cases with the newborn’s serological RhD status reported. The sensitivity of the FetoGnost RhD assay was 99.93% (95% CI 99.61–99.99%) and the specificity was 99.61% (95% CI 98.86–99.87%). No false-positive or false-negative NIPT RhD result was observed in 203 multiple pregnancies. Conclusion NIPT RhD results are reliable when obtained with FetoGnost RhD assay. Targeted routine anti-D-prophylaxis can start as early as 11 + 0 weeks of gestation in singleton and multiple pregnancies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang J, Chen M, Ye X, Chen F, Li Y, Li N, Wu W, Sun J. A cross-sectional survey of pregnant women's knowledge of chromosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion and microduplication syndromes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:82-90. [PMID: 33176246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the knowledge of Chinese pregnant women about fetal chromosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion and microduplication syndromes, and Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). STUDY DESIGN Written questionnaires were distributed to pregnant women who visited the fetal medicine clinic of the third affiliated hospital of Guangzhou medical university. A total of 330 questionnaires were given. Twenty-two questionnaires with incomplete information were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 308 cases were incorporated into the final analysis. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Comparisons between categorical variables were tested by the use of crosstabs and χ 2 test. RESULTS Among pregnant women, the recognition of Down syndrome was the highest (93.5 %), followed by maternal serum screening (74.0 %) and NIPT (69.2 %) for chromosomal aneuploidy. The awareness rates of chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications (18.2 %) and monogenic disorders (13.3 %) were the lowest. There were no significant differences in age, education, and conception way between pregnant women (P > 0.05). When asked the opinion on increasing the testing range of NIPT, more than 50 % of pregnant women chose to follow the provider's advice. CONCLUSION More than half of pregnant women lacked knowledge of screening methods for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Less than 20 % of pregnant women knew microdeletion microduplication syndromes. To enhance the understanding of chromosomal abnormalities can ensure that women can actively choose tests rather than passively agreeing to their provider's recommendations so as to avoid missing the optimal prenatal screening time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yang
- Department of Obstetrics, Zhejiang Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou, 311200, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; The Medical Centre for Critical Pregnant care in Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510150, China.
| | - Xiaoqing Ye
- Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; The Medical Centre for Critical Pregnant care in Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510150, China
| | - Fei Chen
- Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; The Medical Centre for Critical Pregnant care in Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510150, China
| | - Yufan Li
- Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; The Medical Centre for Critical Pregnant care in Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510150, China
| | - Nan Li
- Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; The Medical Centre for Critical Pregnant care in Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510150, China
| | - Wenyan Wu
- BGI Guangzhou Medical Institute Company Limited, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Jimei Sun
- Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; The Medical Centre for Critical Pregnant care in Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510150, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fetal Rhesus D Genotyping and Sex Determination from Maternal Plasma of Rhesus D-Negative Antenatal Population: The Usefulness of Conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction in Resource-limited Settings. Obstet Gynecol Int 2020; 2020:4913793. [PMID: 33123201 PMCID: PMC7585667 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4913793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This prospective cohort study evaluated the usefulness of conventional PCR in genotyping fetal Rhesus D (RhD) and sex from the maternal plasma of RhD-negative (RhD−) antenatal population in resource-limited settings. Methods Thirty apparently healthy RhD− pregnant women with RhD positive (RhD+) partners were included. Blood samples were collected from each participant (in the third trimester of pregnancy) for DNA extraction/purification and fetal RhD genotyping. Results Out of the 30 samples, 26 (86.7%) were found to be RhD+ while 4 (13.3%) were RhD−. The RhD+ comprised 24 (80.0%) RhD+ based on exons 5, 7, and 10 combined. Exons 5 and 7 were detected in two additional samples but not exon 10. Serological phenotyping of neonatal blood confirmed 26 RhD+ and 4 RhD−. There was a perfect agreement between the fetal RhD genotype and neonatal RhD phenotyping after delivery for exons 5 and 7 (concordance = 100%, κ = 100.0%, diagnostic accuracy = 100%, p < 0.0001) while exon 10 presented with an almost perfect agreement (concordance = 93.3%, κ = 76.2%, diagnostic accuracy = 93.3%, p < 0.0001). Regarding the prenatal test for the SRY gene, 9 (30.0%) were predicted to be males and the remaining 21 (60.0%) were females. All the 9 and 21 anticipated males and females, respectively, were confirmed after delivery (concordance = 100%, κ = 100.0%, diagnostic accuracy = 100%). Conclusion Our study suggests that conventional PCR using the SRY, RhD exons 5 and 7 could be useful for predicting fetal sex and RhD from maternal peripheral blood in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hyland CA, O'Brien H, Flower RL, Gardener GJ. Non-invasive prenatal testing for management of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn induced by maternal alloimmunisation. Transfus Apher Sci 2020; 59:102947. [PMID: 33115620 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2020.102947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis reduces the risk of RhD negative women becoming alloimmunised to the RhD antigen and is a major preventative strategy in reducing the burden of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). HDFN also arises from other maternal red cell antibodies, with the most clinically significant, after anti-D, being anti-K, anti-c and anti-E. Among the 39 human blood group systems advanced genomic technologies are still revealing novel or rare antigens involved in maternal alloimmunisation. Where clinically significant maternal antibodies are detected in pregnancy, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of cell-free fetal DNA provides a safe way to assess the fetal blood group antigen status. This provides information as to the risk for HDFN and thus guides management strategies. In many countries, NIPT fetal RHD genotyping as a diagnostic test using real-time PCR has already been integrated into routine clinical care for the management of women with allo-anti-D to assess the risk for HDFN. In addition, screening programs have been established to provide antenatal assessment of the fetal RHD genotype in non-alloimmunised RhD negative pregnant women to target anti-D prophylaxis to those predicted to be carrying an RhD positive baby. Both diagnostic and screening assays exhibit high accuracy (over 99 %). NIPT fetal genotyping for atypical (other than RhD) blood group antigens presents more challenges as most arise from a single nucleotide variant. Recent studies show potential for genomic and digital technologies to provide a personalised medicine approach with NIPT to assess fetal blood group status for women with other (non-D) red cell antibodies to manage the risk for HDFN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A Hyland
- Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Helen O'Brien
- Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert L Flower
- Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rather RA, Dhawan V, Saha SC. Non-invasive prenatal rhesus D genotyping using cell-free foetal DNA. Indian J Med Res 2020; 150:62-66. [PMID: 31571630 PMCID: PMC6798610 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1787_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background & objectives: Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of rhesus D (RHD) genotype using cell-free foetal DNA is extensively used in many developed countries. Studies on NIPD from India are scarce. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping by targeting exon 10 of the RHD gene using cell-free DNA. Methods: DNA was extracted from the maternal plasma of alloimmunized and non-alloimmunized women between 7 and 34 wk of gestation. RHD sequence was determined by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results were compared with RhD phenotype obtained from cord blood samples of neonates. Results: A total of 135 samples from RhD-negative pregnant women were collected. The foetal RHD status was conclusive in all 135 (100%) cases. The highest number of cases reported for RHD genotyping were from Punjab (38.5%) followed by Haryana (24.4%), Himachal Pradesh (17.0%) and Chandigarh Union Territory (13.3%). The non-invasive test correctly predicted the foetal RhD phenotype in 133 of 135 cases, making the accuracy of the test as 98.51 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI): 97.90-99.50%]. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the test were 99.18 per cent (95% CI: 95.52-99.98%) and 92.31 per cent (95% CI: 63.97-99.81%), respectively, with negative and positive predictive values of 99.80 per cent (95% CI: 94.85-99.87%) and 96.31 per cent (95% CI: 62.87-98.84%), respectively. Interpretation & conclusions: Non-invasive foetal RHD determination by single-exon quantitative PCR exhibited high accuracy and could be used in routine clinical practice after confirmatory studies are done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riyaz Ahmad Rather
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Veena Dhawan
- Department of Experimental Medicine & Biotechnology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Subhas Chandra Saha
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clausen FB. Cell‐free fetal
DNA
and fetal blood group genotyping: non‐invasive prenatal testing. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/voxs.12521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Banch Clausen
- Laboratory of Blood Genetics Department of Clinical Immunology Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saramago P, Yang H, Llewellyn A, Walker R, Harden M, Palmer S, Griffin S, Simmonds M. High-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women not known to be sensitised to the RhD antigen: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-172. [PMID: 29580376 DOI: 10.3310/hta22130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal rhesus (D antigen) (RhD) status could avoid unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin for RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-negative fetus, although this may lead to an increased risk of RhD sensitisations. OBJECTIVES To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness and implementation of high-throughput NIPT and to develop a cost-effectiveness model. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and other databases, from inception to February 2016, for studies of high-throughput NIPT free-cell fetal deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) tests of maternal plasma to determine fetal RhD status in RhD-negative pregnant women who were not known to be sensitised to the RhD antigen. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and A Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ACROBAT-NRSI). Summary estimates of false-positive rates (FPRs) and false-negative rates (FNRs) were calculated using bivariate models. Clinical effectiveness evidence was used to conduct a simulation study. We developed a de novo probabilistic decision tree-based cohort model that considered four alternative ways in which the results of NIPT could guide the use of anti-D immunoglobulin antenatally and post partum. Sensitivity analyses (SAs) were conducted to address key uncertainties and model assumptions. RESULTS Eight studies were included in the diagnostic accuracy review, seven studies were included in the clinical effectiveness review and 12 studies were included in the review of implementation. Meta-analyses included women mostly at or post 11 weeks' gestation. The pooled FNR (women at risk of sensitisation) was 0.34% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15% to 0.76%] and the pooled FPR (women needlessly receiving anti-D) was 3.86% (95% CI 2.54% to 5.82%). SAs did not materially alter the overall results. Data on clinical outcomes, including sensitisation rates, were limited. Our simulation suggests that NIPT could substantially reduce unnecessary use of antenatal anti-D with only a small increase in the risk of sensitisation. All large implementation studies suggested that large-scale implementation of high-throughput NIPT was feasible. Seven cost-effectiveness studies were included in the review, which found that the potential for the use of NIPT to produce cost savings was dependent on the cost of the test. Our de novo model suggested that high-throughput NIPT is likely to be cost saving compared with the current practice of providing routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis to all women who are RhD negative. The extent of the cost saving appeared to be sufficient to outweigh the small increase in sensitisations. However, the magnitude of the cost saving is highly sensitive to the cost of NIPT itself. LIMITATIONS There was very limited evidence relating to the clinical effectiveness of high-throughput NIPT, with no evidence on potential adverse effects. The generalisability of the findings to non-white women and multiple pregnancies is unclear. CONCLUSIONS High-throughput NIPT is sufficiently accurate to detect fetal RhD status in RhD-negative women from 11 weeks' gestation and would considerably reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin, potentially resulting in cost savings of between £485,000 and £671,000 per 100,000 pregnancies if the cost of implementing NIPT is in line with that reflected in this evaluation. FUTURE WORK Further research on the diagnostic accuracy of NIPT in non-white women is needed. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015029497. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Saramago
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Huiqin Yang
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Alexis Llewellyn
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ruth Walker
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Stephen Palmer
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Susan Griffin
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Clausen FB. Lessons learned from the implementation of non-invasive fetalRHDscreening. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018; 18:423-431. [DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1461562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Banch Clausen
- Laboratory of Blood Genetics, Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prenatal non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: diagnostic accuracy of a test as a guide for appropriate administration of antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis. BLOOD TRANSFUSION = TRASFUSIONE DEL SANGUE 2018; 16:514-524. [PMID: 29757138 DOI: 10.2450/2018.0270-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Foetal RHD genotyping can be predicted by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using cell-free foetal DNA extracted from maternal plasma. The object of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of non-invasive RHD foetal genotyping, using a commercial multiple-exon assay, as a guide to appropriate administration of targeted antenatal immunoprophylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Cell-free foetal DNA was extracted from plasma of RhD-negative women between 11-30 weeks of pregnancy. The foetal RHD genotype was determined non-invasively by qPCR amplification of exons 5, 7 and 10 of the RHD gene using the Free DNA Fetal Kit® RhD. Results were compared with serological RhD cord blood typing at birth. The analysis of diagnostic accuracy was restricted to the period (24-28+6 weeks) during which foetal genotyping is usually performed for targeted antenatal immunoprophylaxis. RESULTS RHD foetal genotyping was performed on 367 plasma samples (24-28+6 weeks). Neonatal RhD phenotype results were available for 284 pregnancies. Foetal RHD status was inconclusive in 9/284 (3.2%) samples, including four cases with RhD maternal variants. Two false-positive results were registered. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI: 94.0-100). The diagnostic accuracy was 99.3% (95% CI: 98.3-100), decreasing to 96.1% (95% CI: 93.9-98.4) when the inconclusive results were included. The negative and positive predictive values were 100% (95% CI: 100-100) and 99.0% (95% CI: 97.6-100), respectively. There was one false-negative result in a sample collected at 18 weeks. After inclusion of samples at early gestational age (<23+6 week), sensitivity and accuracy were 99.6% (95% CI: 98.7-100) and 95.5% (95% CI: 93.3-97.8), respectively. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates that foetal RHD detection on maternal plasma using a commercial multiple-exon assay is a reliable and accurate tool to predict foetal RhD phenotype. It can be a safe guide for the appropriate administration of targeted prenatal immunoprophylaxis.
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Shaban MM, Salah Eldin NM, Kandil HO, Aly Hassan Z, Rabie WA, Elgarf W, Talaat Elrayes M. Maternal urinary cell free fetal DNA in relation to gestational age. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mefs.2016.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
18
|
Circulating Cell-Free DNA to Determine the Fetal RHD Status in All Three Trimesters of Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:1340-1346. [DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
19
|
Vivanti A, Benachi A, Huchet FX, Ville Y, Cohen H, Costa JM. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal rhesus D genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA during the first trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:606.e1-606.e5. [PMID: 27393271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Revised: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rhesus D genotyping with cell-free fetal DNA currently is used throughout the world. Although this technique has spread rapidly, its optimal use is still a matter of debate. This screening test has been introduced mainly for the treatment of RhD-negative pregnant women during the third trimester of pregnancy, thereby avoiding systematic anti-D prophylaxis, yet such a strategy has proved cost-ineffective. Publications reporting on fetal RHD genotyping with cell-free DNA in maternal plasma, specifically during the first trimester of pregnancy, are scarce in the scientific literature. OBJECTIVE This study sought to assess the performance of noninvasive fetal Rhesus D genotyping in the first trimester of pregnancy with a single-exon real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective observational multicenter study. Cell-free fetal DNA was extracted from maternal blood of both nonimmunized and immunized women at 10-14 weeks of gestation. RHD sequence was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, with amplification of exon 10. Results were compared with RhD phenotype data that were obtained by cord blood sampling of neonates. RESULTS In total, 416 serum samples from RhD-negative pregnant women were collected during the first trimester of pregnancy. The test's overall sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval, 96.9-100.0) and 95.2% (95% confidence interval, 90.5-97.6), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.8% (95% confidence interval, 94.9-100.0) and 97.1% (95% confidence interval, 94.2-98.6), respectively. Fetal RHD status was inconclusive in 9 cases (2.2%). CONCLUSION Noninvasive fetal RHD determination by single-exon quantitative polymerase chain reaction during the first trimester of pregnancy exhibits high accuracy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Mackie FL, Hemming K, Allen S, Morris RK, Kilby MD. The accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. BJOG 2016; 124:32-46. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- FL Mackie
- Centre for Women's & Newborn Health and the Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research; University of Birmingham; Birmingham UK
| | - K Hemming
- Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Institute of Applied Health Sciences; University of Birmingham; Birmingham UK
| | - S Allen
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory; Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Birmingham UK
| | - RK Morris
- Centre for Women's & Newborn Health and the Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research; University of Birmingham; Birmingham UK
- Fetal Medicine Centre; Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Birmingham UK
| | - MD Kilby
- Centre for Women's & Newborn Health and the Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research; University of Birmingham; Birmingham UK
- Fetal Medicine Centre; Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Birmingham UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Abstract
Prenatal diagnostic testing is available for a growing number of disorders. The goal of prenatal diagnosis was initially focused on the identification of Down syndrome in women aged 35 years and older, but invasive prenatal genetic techniques can now detect a far broader array of conditions. The risks of invasive procedures have also decreased over time. Advances in genomic medicine allow testing for smaller but significant chromosomal abnormalities known as copy number variants, in addition to major aneuploidies and structural rearrangements. Molecular DNA techniques can detect many single-gene conditions. In the future, it is likely that whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing will be applied to prenatal genetic testing to allow identification of yet more genetic disorders. With advances in technology, the indications for testing have likewise evolved far beyond recommendations based solely on maternal age to include a more patient-centered view of the goals of prenatal testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Norton
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wou K, Feinberg JL, Wapner RJ, Simpson JL. Cell-free DNA versus intact fetal cells for prenatal genetic diagnostics: what does the future hold? Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2015; 15:989-98. [DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2015.1051529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|