Thirty U.S. Poison Center reports later: greater demand, more difficult problems

Increasing severity of medical outcomes and associated substances in cases reported to United States poison centers

INTRODUCTION

Poison centers provide free expert recommendations on the treatment of a wide variety of toxicological emergencies. Prior studies have called attention to the increasing complexity of cases reported to poison centers. We aimed first, to evaluate the trends in medical outcome severity, over a 15-year period in both the adult and pediatric populations. Second, we described the most frequently reported substances associated with major effect or death.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of exposures reported to the National Poison Data System from 1 January 2007 through 31 December 2021. All closed cases, for human exposures, reported during the study period were included. We assessed trends in frequencies and rates of medical outcomes and level of care received, among the adult (age greater than 19 years) and pediatric (age 19 years and younger) populations by reason for exposure.

RESULTS

During the study period, the number of adult unintentional exposures resulting in major effect (37.4 percent) and death (65.3 percent) increased. The number of adult intentional exposures resulting in death increased by 233.9 percent and those resulting in a major effect increased by 133.1 percent. The rates of exposures resulting in major effect and death increased among both intentional and unintentional adult exposures. The number of pediatric unintentional exposures resulting in a major effect increased by 76.6 percent and the number of pediatric intentional exposures resulting in death and major effect increased by 122.7 and 190.1 percent, respectively. Moderate, major effect, and death rates increased in pediatric unintentional exposures and moderate and major effect rates increased in pediatric intentional exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a worsening severity of medical outcomes in adult and pediatric cases reported to poison centers. Poison centers are increasingly managing complex cases. Monitoring trends in which substances are associated with severe outcomes is imperative for future strategic prevention efforts.

Forty years of National Poison Data System Annual Reports

INTRODUCTION

The 40th National Poison Data System Annual Report from America's Poison Centers is published in this issue of Clinical Toxicology. This Commentary will focus on changes that have occurred over the years and emerging trends while highlighting some of the strengths and weaknesses of the system.

FORTY YEARS OF NATIONAL POISON DATA SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORTS

The National Poison Data System now receives poison exposure data from all 50 states and territories of the United States, representing all levels of care and medical outcomes, and is collected in near real-time. The 2022 report is double in size from the 1983 report and shows changes in the distribution of exposure substances and at least a doubling in the percentage of calls from a health care facility, intentional exposures, and fatalities. There was also a more modest increase in cases managed in a health care facility, and a 40% drop in the percentage of cases managed in those under age 6. While total reported poison center cases have been decreasing since 2008, cases with more serious medical outcomes have steadily increased. To address the decline in the total number of less serious cases, an online tool was initiated for consumers to obtain simple individualized poisoning recommendations as an alternative to directly contacting a poison center.

FENTANYL EXPOSURES AND TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS

Fentanyl exposures reported to the National Poison Data System have increased rapidly since 2019, driven by non-prescription fentanyl. Reporting of this was facilitated by the granularity of the generic coding schema and the ability to develop new generic codes rapidly, unlike some other national data sets. Total fentanyl exposures and those with more serious outcomes show a good correlation with national data on fentanyl deaths, demonstrating the ability of the National Poison Data System to function as a surveillance tool. Fentanyl concentrations reported to the National Poison Data System Fatality module showed antemortem concentrations to be slightly lower than postmortem concentrations, little difference between postmortem peripheral and central concentrations, and single substance concentrations slightly higher than cases with multiple substances.

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES

Strengths include the breadth of the database, granularity, contemporaneous data collection, near-real-time data submission allowing for automated toxicosurveillance activities, ability to rapidly activate emergency product codes for emerging situations, a robust web-based query tool, mapping of generic codes and clinical effects to other data dictionaries, and review by toxicologists of fatalities to assign a relative contribution. Weaknesses include voluntarily reported, non-verified exposures, interpreting reported medical outcomes (non-toxic and fatalities), lag-time in collecting data on new therapeutic modalities, and mortality data varying from that reported by other sources.

CONCLUSION

Poison center data gives a robust, reproducible image of the populations that utilize poison center resources and seems to mirror trends noted from other data sources. This supports the continued need for poison centers in the information age to support the management of patients potentially exposed to poisons and those who are more severely poisoned.

Trends in types of calls managed by U.S. poison centers 2000-2015

AIM

The number of cases reported to poison centers has decreased since 2008 but there is evidence that the complexity of calls is increasing.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives are to evaluate national poison center data for trends in reason and how these changes effect management site, medical outcomes, and poison center workload.

METHODS

Data regarding reason, age, management site, and medical outcome were extracted from annual reports of the National Poison Data System from 2000 to 2015. The proportion of cases by year were determined for unintentional and intentional exposures. Analysis of data from a single poison center from 2005 to 2015 compared the number of interactions between poison center staff and callers for unintentional versus intentional reasons.

RESULTS

Trend analyses found that from 2000 to 2015 the percent of unintentional cases decreased (from 85.9 to 78.4%, p < .0001) and the percent of intentional cases increased (from 11.3 to 17.6%, p < .0001). Age distribution changed with a decrease in children <13 years of age and increase in adolescents and adults. In these latter two age groups, the proportion due to intentional exposure increased while unintentional declined. The distribution of management sites changed over the 16-year period, with a decrease in non-HCF cases and significant increase in percent of cases treated in a HCF. The frequencies of moderate effect, major effect, and death were significantly higher for intentional exposures than for unintentional exposures. Analysis of data entry notes from a single center showed that the mean number of notes per unintentional case (1.61 ± 0.08) was significantly different from the mean number of notes per intentional case (9.23 ± 0.68) (p < .0001).

DISCUSSION

Poison centers are managing more intentional exposures and fewer unintentional exposures. Intentional exposures require more poison center staff expertise and time.

CONCLUSION

Looking only at poison center total call volume may not be an adequate method to gauge productivity.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) for Severe Toxicological Exposures: Review of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC)

Although there have been many developments related to specific strategies for treating patients after poisoning exposures, the mainstay of therapy remains symptomatic and supportive care. One of the most aggressive supportive modalities is extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our goal was to describe the use of ECMO for toxicological exposures reported to the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC). We performed a retrospective review of the ACMT ToxIC Registry from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 0 to 89 years, evaluated between January 2010 through December 2013, and received ECMO for toxicological exposure. There were 26,271 exposures (60 % female) reported to the ToxIC Registry, 10 (0.0004 %) received ECMO: 4 pediatric (< 12 years), 2 adolescent (12-18 years), and 4 adults (>18 years). Time of initiation of ECMO ranged from 4 h to 4 days, with duration from 15 h to 12 days. Exposures included carbon monoxide/smoke inhalation (2), bitter almonds, methanol, and several medications including antihistamines (2), antipsychotic/antidepressant (2), cardiovascular drugs (2), analgesics (2), sedative/hypnotics (2), and antidiabetics (2). Four ECMO patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during their hospital course, and the overall survival rate was 80 %. ECMO was rarely used for poisoning exposures in the ACMT ToxIC Registry. ECMO was utilized for a variety of ages and for pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical exposures. In most cases, ECMO was administered prior to cardiovascular failure, and survival rate was high. If available, ECMO may be a valid treatment modality.

Endotracheal Intubation for Toxicologic Exposures: A Retrospective Review of Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Cases

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal intubation remains a cornerstone of early resuscitation of the poisoned patient, but little is known about which substances are associated with intubation.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to describe patient exposures to substances reported to the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) that were managed with intubation between 2010 and 2014.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of cases managed with endotracheal intubation in the ACMT ToxIC Registry from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient exposures.

RESULTS

A total of 2724 exposures to substances were managed with endotracheal intubation. Intubated patients were 52% male and 82% adults. For all ages taken together, the most common known single-substance exposures managed with intubation were sedative hypnotics (9.8%), antidepressants (8.7%), and opioids (8.0%). The most common single ingestions associated with intubation in various age groups were: opioids (<2 years old), alpha-2 agonists (2-6 years old), antidepressants (7-18 years old), sedative-hypnotics (19-65 years old), and cardiac medications (>65 years old). Multiple substances were involved in 29.0% of exposures. Decontamination and elimination processes were used in 12.8% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common substances involved in single- and multiple-substance exposures managed with intubation varied by age group. Most patients were managed with supportive care. Knowledge of substances commonly involved in exposures managed with intubation may inform triage and resource planning in the emergency department resuscitation of critically ill poisoned patients.

Billing and reimbursement for a bedside toxicology service at a tertiary care academic center during its first fiscal year

A bedside toxicology consult service may improve clinical care, facilitate patient clearance and disposition, and result in potential cost savings for poisoning exposures. Despite this, there is scant data regarding economic feasibility for such a service. Previously published information suggests low hourly reimbursement at approximately $26.00/h at the bedside for toxicology consultations. A bedside toxicology consultant service was initiated in 2011. Coverage was available 24 h a day for 50 out of 52 weeks. Bedside rounding on toxicology consult patients was available 6/7 days per week. The practice is associated with >800 bed teaching institution in a large upstate NY region with elements of urban and suburban practice. Demographic and billing data was collected for all patients consulted upon from July 1, 2011 to June 31, 2012. In charges of $514,941 were generated during the period of data collection. Monthly average was $42,912. Net reimbursement of charges was 29 % of overall charges at $147,792. In terms of total encounters, net collection rate in which something was reimbursed or "paid" against charges for that encounter was 82.6 % of all encounters at 999/1,210. Average encounter time for inpatients, including critical care, was 1.05 h, and the average time spent for outpatients was 1.18 h. Reimbursement rates appear higher than previously reported. Revenue generated from reimbursement from toxicology consultation can result in recouping a substantial portion of a toxicologist's salary or potentially fund fellowship positions and salaries or toxicology division infrastructure.