Early outcomes of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

The Fate of Unresurfaced Patellae in Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early to Midterm Results

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased significantly over the past decade in the United States, likely due to modern patella-friendly implants, complications with resurfacing, and the knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship out to 8.5 years in a cohort of contemporary primary TKAs with patella-friendly femoral components and unresurfaced patellae.

METHODS

A total of 1,053 consecutive primary TKAs with unresurfaced patellae were retrospectively reviewed. A selective patellar nonresurfacing protocol was used for all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on patellar revision and the latest follow-up. An aggressive lateral patellar facetectomy was performed in 78% (823 of 1,053) of cases. The cohort was 62% women and 43% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II with a mean age and body mass index of 65 years (range, 35 to 94) and 35 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 65), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 4 (0.4%, 4 of 1,053) unresurfaced patellae were revised. Three were resurfaced as part of other procedures: 2 for global instability and one for aseptic loosening at a mean of 1.6 years; and one patella was resurfaced by an outside surgeon for unexplained pain. The all-cause revision-free survivorship estimate specifically related to the patella was 98.9% (95% confidence interval, 98 to 100) out to 8.5 years. No significant difference in survivorship was related to patellae with or without a lateral patellar facetectomy (99.5 versus 98.1%, P ≥ .191); however, 3 of 4 patellar revisions occurred in TKAs without a lateral patellar facetectomy (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate excellent revision-free survivorship related to unresurfaced patellae, particularly when a lateral facetectomy was performed. These early to midterm results using modern patella-friendly femoral components are promising and comparable to resurfaced patellae in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of elective primary total knee replacement with PAtellar Resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing: a pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled Trial (PART)

Aims

During total knee replacement (TKR), surgeons can choose whether or not to resurface the patella, with advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Recently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended always resurfacing the patella, rather than never doing so. NICE found insufficient evidence on selective resurfacing (surgeon's decision based on intraoperative findings and symptoms) to make recommendations. If effective, selective resurfacing could result in optimal individualized patient care. This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of primary TKR with always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing.

Methods

The PAtellar Resurfacing Trial (PART) is a patient- and assessor-blinded multicentre, pragmatic parallel two-arm randomized superiority trial of adults undergoing elective primary TKR for primary osteoarthritis at NHS hospitals in England, with an embedded internal pilot phase (ISRCTN 33276681). Participants will be randomly allocated intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis (stratified by centre and implant type (cruciate-retaining vs cruciate-sacrificing)) to always resurface or selectively resurface the patella, once the surgeon has confirmed sufficient patellar thickness for resurfacing and that constrained implants are not required. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcome measures at three months, six months, and one year (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, OKS, EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, need for further surgery, resource use, and costs). Cost-effectiveness will be measured for the lifetime of the patient. Overall, 530 patients will be recruited to obtain 90% power to detect a four-point difference in OKS between the groups one year after surgery, assuming up to 40% resurfacing in the selective group.

Conclusion

The trial findings will provide evidence about the clinical and cost-effectiveness of always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing. This will inform future NICE guidelines on primary TKR and the role of selective patellar resurfacing.

Bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing. A prospective single surgeon series with a minimum follow-up of 7 years

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most effective treatment for end-stage adult knee osteoarthritis, but it has been reported that patient satisfaction may vary. A malfunction of the patellofemoral joint may produce anterior knee pain (AKP) for several reasons. While some surgeons systematically resurface the patella despite the risk of potential complications such as fracture, loosening, or wear of the patella, others prefer to preserve it to reduce AKP and revision rates. This study aimed to evaluate whether patellar resurfacing had better clinical and functional outcomes, complications, and revision rates in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study, including patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKA in which the patella was replaced in one knee and preserved in the other, with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. We assessed clinical and functional outcomes with the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); complications and revision rates were also registered.

RESULTS

The final series consisted of 43 patients with 86 knee arthroplasties. After a mean of 7.6 years of follow-up, no significant differences were found regarding KSS (clinical: 82.8 ± 7.4 versus 83.2 ± 3.4, p = 0.92; functional 89.1 ± 8.2: versus 90.4 ± 6.8; p = 0.99), VAS (2.0 ± 0.9 versus 1.8 ± 1.0; p = 0.84), complications (10.5% versus 8.1%; p = 0.57), or revision rates (2.3% versus 2.3%; p = 0.99) when comparing patellar resurfacing versus retention.

CONCLUSION

In the context of total knee arthroplasty, patellar replacement did not demonstrate statistically significant differences concerning patellar retention in clinical nor functional outcomes, AKP, complications, or revision rates after a minimum of 7 years of follow-up.

Higher failure rate of secondary patellar resurfacing following bicompartmental knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The role of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) in anterior knee pain (AKP) is still debated in literature. A regional arthroplasty registry was investigated, aiming to: (1) assess the survival rate of SPR; and (2) compare SPR to tricompartmental TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The regional arthroplasty registry RIPO was investigated about all SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty. The survival rates and the reasons for revision were assessed as any other factor that could have influenced implants failure. SPR survivorship was compared to tricompartmental TKAs.

RESULTS

406 SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty were analyzed. The survival rates were 80.6% (CI 95% 75.9-84.5) at 5 years and 77.6% (CI 95% 72.4-82) at 7 years. Half of the SPRs was performed 0.9-2.4 years after the index bicompartmental arthroplasty. SPR achieved lower survival than tricompartmental TKA (80.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio for failure of 5.5 (CI 95% 4.2-7.1, p < 0.001). SPRs performed within 2 years after primary implant had a significantly higher rates of failure when compared to tricompartmental TKA (HR: 6.4, CI 95% 4.8-8.4, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SPR after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty showed modest 5- and 7-year survival rates, worse than primary tricompartmental TKA. When SPRs are performed within 2 years after primary arthroplasty, a significant higher risk of failure should be expected, highlighting than appropriate pre-operative work-up and patient selection is crucial for SPR successful outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, therapeutic study.

Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae

BACKGROUND

The decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs.

RESULTS

Rates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit.

A Narrative Review of Patellar Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The number of individuals who experience the symptoms of gonarthrosis rises proportionally as life expectancy rises and the population becomes more active. The purpose of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to lessen pain and restore knee function, and it has a high success rate. The restoration of patellar tracking in addition to the proper alignment of the femoral and tibial components contributes to the success of the arthroplasty and the patient's happiness. Replacement of the knee is not an easy process. One of the major objectives of total knee replacement is to achieve the proper rotation of the femoral components. A critical step that affects postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty is the correct alignment of the femoral component. The axial plane of the femoral component is to blame for flexion stability, knee joint kinematics, flexion alignment, and patellar tracking. The patella is the largest sesamoid bone in the human body, and its major role is to enhance the quadriceps' moment arm, which allows the knee to expand. The distribution of patellofemoral compressive pressures during knee flexion and the centralization of the quadriceps muscles' multidirectional pull during extension are both critical functions of the patella. After primary knee arthroplasty, there are 8% more cases of anterior knee discomfort than there were before. Whether or not the patella was resurfaced, patients with primary TKA experience anterior knee discomfort. Patella baja is caused by excessive joint line elevation, which causes persistent overload and discomfort. The design of the TKR might have an impact on postoperative patellofemoral problems. After TKR, patellofemoral maltracking and patellar dislocation are often caused by surgical mistakes.

Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity.

METHODS

A total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135).

CONCLUSION

In contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty With Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis and Patellar Resurfacing: Prevalence and Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with patient dissatisfaction. Factors related to postoperative anterior knee pain and its impact on patient outcomes are poorly understood. The following are the aims of this study: (1) to report the prevalence of anterior knee pain before and after TKA using a posterior-stabilized prosthesis with routine patellar resurfacing; (2) to investigate the association of preoperative clinical factors with the presence of anterior knee pain after TKA; and (3) to explore the association of postoperative anterior knee pain with postoperative self-reported function and quality of life.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 506 patients who had undergone elective primary unilateral TKA with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis and patellar resurfacing. Outcome measures prior to and 12 months after TKA included self-reported anterior knee pain, knee function, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Prevalence of anterior knee pain was 72% prior to and 15% following TKA. Patients who had preoperative anterior knee pain had twice the risk of experiencing anterior knee pain after TKA than patients who did not have preoperative anterior knee pain (risk ratio: 2.37, 95% CI 1.73-2.96). Greater severity of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function were associated with the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain (rho = 0.15, P < .01; rho = 0.13, P < .01, respectively). Preoperative age, gender, and quality of life were not associated with postoperative anterior knee pain. Greater severity of postoperative anterior knee pain was associated with worse knee function at 12 months postoperative (rho = 0.49, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

One in 7 patients reported anterior knee pain 12 months following posterior-stabilized and patella-resurfaced TKA. The presence of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function are associated with postoperative anterior knee pain.

Clinical effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing and selective resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational evidence

Background

Patellar resurfacing is optional during total knee replacement (TKR). Some surgeons always resurface the patella, some never resurface, and others selectively resurface. Which resurfacing strategy provides optimal outcomes is unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing, and selective resurfacing in primary TKR.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and bibliographies were searched to November 2021 for randomised-control trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes for two or more resurfacing strategies (resurfacing, no resurfacing, or selective resurfacing) in primary TKR. Observational studies were included if limited or no RCTs existed for resurfacing comparisons. Outcomes assessed were patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and further surgery. Study-specific relative risks [RR] were aggregated using random-effects models. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results

We identified 33 RCTs involving 5,540 TKRs (2,727 = resurfacing, 2,772 = no resurfacing, 41 = selective resurfacing). One trial reported on selective resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing reduced anterior knee pain compared with no resurfacing (RR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.44–0.96)); there were no significant differences in PROMs. Resurfacing reduced the risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.63, CI = 0.42–0.94) and other complications (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.39–0.74) compared with no resurfacing. Quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. Limited observational evidence (5 studies, TKRs = 215,419) suggested selective resurfacing increased the revision risk (RR = 1.14, CI = 1.05–1.22) compared with resurfacing. Compared with no resurfacing, selective resurfacing had a higher risk of pain (RR = 1.25, CI = 1.04–1.50) and lower risk of revision (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.85–0.99).

Conclusions

Level 1 evidence supports TKR with patellar resurfacing over no resurfacing. Resurfacing has a reduced risk of anterior knee pain, revision surgery, and complications, despite PROMs being comparable. High-quality RCTs involving selective resurfacing, the most common strategy in the UK and other countries, are needed given the limited observational data suggests selective resurfacing may not be effective over other strategies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05877-7.

Osteoarthritic Severity in Unresurfaced Patellae Does Not Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes in Contemporary Primary TKA

Introduction:

The degree of osteoarthritis (OA) acceptable to leave in a native patella during unresurfaced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. This study's purpose was to examine the effect of patellofemoral OA severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing.

Methods:

One hundred ninety-three primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patellofemoral OA severity was graded on severity, marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and chondral damage using accepted grading systems. Patellar tilt and tibiofemoral alignment were measured radiographically. PROMs were evaluated at a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Results:

In multivariate regression, preoperative lateral patella Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 was associated with superior change in Knee Society Score pain with level walking, higher absolute change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P ≤ 0.029), and knees ‟always feeling normal” (odds ratio [OR] 3.12; P = 0.005). Osteoarthritis Research Society International atlas grades and Outerbridge classification scores did not significantly influence PROMs.

Discussion:

Worse preoperative OA severity in the lateral patellar facet, graded with the Kellgren-Lawrence system, predicted superior knee-specific PROMs in patients with unresurfaced patellae after contemporary TKA. This observation supports the clinical finding that patients with more severe OA have optimized patient outcomes and highlights the minimal contribution of patella OA to knee function after primary TKA.

To Resurface or Not to Resurface the Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty, That Is the Question: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Objetives: Currently, total knee arthroplasty is one of the most common surgeries, increasing with the increase in life expectancy. Whether or not to replace the patella has been a subject of debate over the years, remaining in controversy and without reaching a consensus. Over the years, different meta-analyses have been carried out in order to provide evidence on the subject, although, in recent times, there have not been many new studies in this regard. Therefore, it is considered necessary that the latest works form part of a new meta-analysis. Materials and Method: We searched the literature using PUBMED, SCOPUS, the Cochrane database and VHL from 2010 to 2020. The search terms used were “patellar” AND “resurfacing” OR “Replacement” and “no resurfacing” OR “no replacement”. A meta-analysis was performed with Stata software (Stata version 15.1). Forest plots were generated to illustrate the overall effect of knee arthroplasty interventions. Results: As a result, it was obtained that there is a significantly higher risk of suffering AKP in the non-resurfacing group, in addition to a significant increase in the risk of undergoing a reoperation in the non-resurfacing group. On the other hand, significant differences were obtained in favor of the resurfacing group in both the clinical and Feller KSS, with functional KSS being inconclusive. After analyzing different variables throughout the literature, it does seem clear that the non-resurfacing group may present a higher risk of reoperation than the resurfacing group. Conclusion: For all these reasons, we think that, although it does seem that not replacing the patella can precipitate a reoperation, it is not clear whether this reoperation is a direct consequence of not having replaced the patella. Therefore, in our opinion, the treatment must be individualized for each patient.

Patellar management during total knee arthroplasty: a review

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella, never resurface the patella, or selectively resurface the patella based on specific patient or patellar criteria.

Studies comparing resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella during TKA have reported inconsistent and contradictory findings.

When resurfacing the patella is chosen, there are a number of available patellar component designs, materials, and techniques for cutting and fixation.

When patellar non-resurfacing is chosen, several alternatives are available, including patellar denervation, lateral retinacular release, and patelloplasty. Surgeons may choose to perform any of these alone, or together in some combination.

Prospective randomized studies are needed to better understand which patellar management techniques contribute to superior postoperative outcomes. Until then, this remains a controversial topic, and options for patellar management will need to be weighed on an individual basis per patient.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:861-871. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156

Patellar resurfacing during primary total knee replacement is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery

AIMS

Debate remains whether the patella should be resurfaced during total knee replacement (TKR). For non-resurfaced TKRs, we estimated what the revision rate would have been if the patella had been resurfaced, and examined the risk of re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry (NJR) was performed. All primary TKRs for osteoarthritis alone performed between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016 were eligible (n = 842,072). Patellar resurfacing during TKR was performed in 36% (n = 305,844). The primary outcome was all-cause revision surgery. Secondary outcomes were the number of excess all-cause revisions associated with using TKRs without (versus with) patellar resurfacing, and the risk of re-revision after secondary patellar resurfacing.

RESULTS

The cumulative risk of all-cause revision at ten years was higher (p < 0.001) in primary TKRs without patellar resurfacing (3.54% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47 to 3.62)) compared to those with resurfacing (3.00% (95% CI 2.91 to 3.11)). Using flexible parametric survival modelling, we estimated one 'excess' revision per 189 cases performed where the patella was not resurfaced by ten years (equivalent to 2,842 excess revisions in our cohort). The risk of all-cause re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing was 4.6 times higher than the risk of revision after primary TKR with patellar resurfacing (at five years from secondary patellar resurfacing, 8.8% vs 1.9%).

CONCLUSION

Performing TKR without patellar resurfacing was associated with an increased risk of revision. Secondary patellar resurfacing led to a high risk of re-revision. This represents a potential substantial healthcare burden that should be considered when forming treatment guidelines and commissioning services. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):864-871.

The Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Prosthesis: Indications for Bone Stock and Patellar Morphology

The patellar resurfacing is still a controversial and unresolved problem. The choice to use the patellar resurfacing in the total knee prosthesis (TKP) is decided by the surgeon's experience; he analyzes the thickness, the shape, consumption of the surface and he chooses the use of patellar resurfacing or to limit itself to cheiloplasty, denervation, or often to the release of the lateral wing ligament. He also assesses the metabolic state of the bone linked to Osteoporosis and the potential fragility of the joint and kneecap in particular. Bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKP) may lead to periprosthetic fractures that are associated with significant costs (morbidity, economic, etc.) and pose a challenge to operative fixation. The literature doesn't express a definitive judgment on the two options, since the results can be overlapped on average. Each option has advantages and disadvantages to be considered in the overall balance of the patellar operation. In reality, however, this technical choice requires more consolidated decision-making criteria so as to minimize the incidence of post-surgical femoral-patellar pain syndrome, the second cause of failure, which frequently leads to revision of the implant. The balance between experience and evidence can be a compromise in the choice of surgery. The experience documented in the literature must identify the parameters capable of constructing an algorithm aimed not only at the secondary resurfacing rate, but at the overall clinical evaluation. This has implications also for the rehabilitation of these patients after surgery.

The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon's preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced.

METHODS

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed.

RESULTS

For all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Resurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.

Effect of Patellar Resurfacing on Clinical Outcomes, Range of Knee Motion and Anterior Knee Pain in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objectives: In this study, we retrospectively compare the clinical results, range of knee motion and anterior knee pain in patients on whom we performed knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing.

Thirty-eight patients were evaluated in the study. Knee Society scores, knee range of motion and anterior knee pain before and 12 months after surgery were detected. Patients were divided into two groups: resurfaced patellas and nonresurfaced patellas. There were 18 patients in the resurfaced group and 20 patients in the nonresurfaced group.

Mean Knee Society score was 40.72±13.09 in the resur-faced group and 38.55±5.88 in the nonresurfaced group before surgery. Mean Knee Society score was 80.38±7.78 in the resur-faced group and 80.10±3.22 in the nonresurfaced group in the last control. Mean knee range of motion was 92.83±12.12 degrees in the resurfaced group and 91.05±10.10 degrees in the nonresurfaced group before surgery. Mean range of motion was 106.22±9.13 degrees in the resurfaced group and 97.25±8.50 degrees in the nonresurfaced group after surgery. There were twelve patients with anterior pain before surgery in the resur-faced group and 13 patients with anterior knee pain before surgery in the nonresurfaced group. After surgery, there was one patient with anterior pain in the resurfaced group and 9 patients with anterior knee pain in the nonresurfaced group.

Anterior knee pain ratio was smaller in the resurfaced group than in the nonresurfaced group, and there was a significant difference in range of knee motion as a result of our study. We offered to resurface the patella.

Better outcomes with patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a feasible and cost-effective procedure. However, resurfacing of the patella sparks a heated debate. Anterior knee pain after TKA was supposed to be correlated to the patellofemoral joint, and the resurface of the patella was believed to be effective to avoid this complication.

AIM

A meta-analysis was performed to update current evidence concerning the outcomes of patellar resurfacing versus retaining for total knee arthroplasty. The first outcomes of interest were to compare the rate of anterior knee pain and revision surgeries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted accessing the main databases: Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus. All the prospective clinical trials comparing the outcomes between patellar resurfacing versus retaining were included in this study. Only articles classified as level of evidence I to II were considered for inclusion. Only studies reporting a minimum 24 months follow-up were included. The following data were extracted: demographic baseline, anterior knee pain, reoperations, clinical scores (HSS, KSS and related subscales) and range of motion (ROM). Studies solely reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included.

RESULTS

In favor of the resurfacing group, we observed a statistically significant reduced rate of anterior knee pain (odd ratio 1.73) and reoperation (odd ratio 3.24). In the resurfacing group, a prevalence of anterior knee pain of 11.15% was detected, whereas in the retaining group it amounted to 17.39%. Furthermore, a greater KSS pain (+ 0.97%), KSS clinical (+ 0.23%), KSS functional (+ 2.44%), KSS overall (+ 2.47%) and HSS (+ 5.64%) were reported. In the retaining group, we found a better range of motion (+ 3.09°).

CONCLUSION

Based on the main findings of this meta-analysis, patellar resurfaced TKA was demonstrated to have performed superior overall. Patellar resurfacing detected a lower rate of postoperative anterior knee pain and reoperation. Moreover, the resurfacing group showed greater value of the HSS, KSS and related subscales. In favor of the retaining group, a slightly better ROM was evidenced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.

An optimum prosthesis combination of low-risk total knee arthroplasty options in all five primary categories of design results in a 60% reduction in revision risk: a registry analysis of 482,373 prostheses

PURPOSE

Decades of innovations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design have led to large number of possible prosthesis combinations in regards fixation, posterior stability, bearing mobility, bearing surface, and patella resurfacing, each of which can alter the revision risk. The accumulative effect when the lowest risk combination in each design category, or "Optimum Prosthesis Combination" (OPC) is utilized remains unknown. The purpose of this analysis was to first, identify the OPC and second, to compare the revision risk of a cohort who received the OPC to a cohort who received an Alternative Prosthesis Combination (APC).

METHODS

National registry revision risk data for primary TKA for osteoarthritis were obtained from September 1999 to December 2015 for two patient cohorts, those receiving an OPC and those receiving an APC. OPC was defined as TKA with the lowest revision risk option for five primary TKA design categories; fixation, posterior stability, bearing mobility, bearing surface, and patella resurfacing, while APC had one or more higher risk options.

RESULTS

Of the 482,373 included TKA, 42,008 (8.7%) were in the OPC cohort, who received a minimally stabilized, fixed bearing TKA with cross-linked polyethylene with patella resurfacing. Both cohorts had similar demographics. At 10 years, the OPC cohort had a Cumulative Percent Revision of 2.4% (95% CI 2.1, 2.8) compared to 5.5% (95% CI 5.4, 5.6) for the APC cohort. For all patients, revision risk of the APC cohort was higher at all times [151% greater at ≥ 3 years (p < 0.001)]. Loosening/lysis was the most common cause of revision in the ACP cohort (1.1%), while it was the second most common cause in the OPC cohort (0.3%). The increased risk was apparent in all age and gender subgroups, with the highest risk increase seen in males ≥ 65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving the lowest risk prosthesis design combination or Optimum Prosthesis Combination TKA had a 60% lower revision risk, with similar demographics to the Alternative Prosthesis Combination TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Different Factors Conduct Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the risks associated with anterior knee pain (AKP) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A computerized search was performed of the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central (published prior to July 2017). A total of 37 studies, which included 1641 cases of AKP and 168,090 TKAs, were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A subgroup analysis revealed that compared with those without the following medical conditions, patients who had an infrapatellar fat pad excision and more than 12 months of follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 12.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.245-48.781) were more likely to have AKP after TKA. Circumpatellar electrocautery (>12 months: OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.326-0.760; ≤12 months: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.408-0.867) and patellar resurfacing (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.131-0.485) may decrease the risk of AKP. Other factors, including the prosthesis bearing type (mobile bearing or fixed bearing) and the approach (midvastus compared with the medial parapatellar approach), were not significant risk factors for AKP.

CONCLUSION

The use of strategies such as patellar denervation and patellar resurfacing in primary TKA is recommended because they are safe and result in good clinical outcomes in preventing AKP. Caution should be taken when using an infrapatellar fat pad excision, because there is an increased risk of AKP at long-term follow-up (>12 months). Future studies should investigate these different strategies to confirm the underlying mechanisms and help prevent the occurrence of AKP after TKA. The timing of AKP onset remains unclear and requires further research.

Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate this technique through an analysis of comparative studies in the current literature.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases using various combinations of the keywords "Knee," "Replacement," "Prosthesis," "Patella," "Resurfacing," and "Arthroplasty." All articles relevant to the subject were retrieved, and their bibliographies were hand searched for further references relevant to primary patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

The percentage for a reoperation was 1% for the patellar resurfacing group (17/1636) and 6.9% for the non-resurfacing group (118/1699) (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.29, P < .00001). The patellar resurfacing group showed a significantly higher postop Knee Society Score (KSS) pain (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.68-2.35, P = .004) and postop Hospital for Special Surgery score (OR 4.35, 95% CI 3.21-5.49, P < .00001), over the non-resurfacing group.

CONCLUSION

Based on the outcome scores of KSS (pain), KSS (function), and Hospital for Special Surgery postop, patellar resurfacing TKAs have performed better than non-resurfaced TKAs. The lower secondary operation and revision rates for patellar resurfaced TKAs also demonstrate that this technique is the more effective option. However, the full impact of patellar resurfacing still needs to be critically evaluated by larger randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.

Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries

BACKGROUND

Lack of evidence contributes to unnecessary variation in treatment costs and outcomes. This study aimed to identify from interventions historically used for total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA): i) if routine use is supported by high-level evidence; ii) whether surgeon use aligns with the evidence.

METHODS

Part 1: Systematic search of electronic library databases for systematic reviews and practice guidelines concerning seven acute-care interventions. Intervention-specific recommendations concerning routine use were extracted by assessors. Part 2: Prospective medical record audit of the acute-care received by 1900 patients involving 120 orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeon use per intervention was summarized using caterpillar plots. Surgeon-specific routine and non-routine use was defined as use in ≥ 90% and ≤ 10% of patients, respectively. Primary analysis included only surgeons contributing ≥ 10 patients.

RESULTS

Continuous passive motion (TKA): Routine use not recommended; 85.7% of surgeons did not use it routinely. Tranexamic Acid: Routine use recommended; 26.9% of surgeons used it routinely. Cryotherapy: Routine use not recommended; 45.7% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA; 31.8% used it routinely for THA. Intra-articular drainage: Routine use not recommended for TKA, but possible benefits for THA; 5.7% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA, 0.0% used it routinely for THA. Antibiotic loaded bone cement: Routine use for TKA not supported, recommendations for use for THA are inconsistent; 90.0% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA, 100.0% used it routinely for THA. Patella resurfacing (TKA): No recommendation could be made; 57.1% of surgeons routinely resurfaced the patella. Indwelling urinary catheterisation: Routine use recommended; 59.6% of surgeons used it routinely.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for routine use or not exist for some of the acute-care interventions examined. Surgeon practices vary widely even in the presence of high-level recommendations. It is unclear whether further evidence alone would lessen unwarranted practice variation.

Optimizing patellar positioning during total knee arthroplasty: an anatomical and clinical study

INTRODUCTION

Optimal positioning of the patellar component is crucial for the success of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Usually, the patellar component is placed empirically over the presumed centre of the patellar cut. Medialization of the prosthetic patella has been recommended; however, no evidence-based guidelines have been reported.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This anatomical study aims to quantify a pre-defined optimal location for positioning of the patellar component with regard to the centre of the patellar cut. Intra-operative measurements of the patellar cut of a series of 129 TKA were conducted in order to measure the distance between the optimal centre of prosthetic patella (OCPP) and the centre of the patellar cut, and that over the vertical (proximal-distal) axis and the horizontal axis (medial-lateral).

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated that, (a) a significant morphological difference of the patellar cut exists between men and women (P < 0.0001), and (b) with reference to centre of the patellar cut, the OCPP lies superiorly and medially in 89%, inferiorly and medially in 9.4%, laterally and superiorly in 1.6%, and in no case laterally and inferiorly. No anterior pain, dislocation episode or patellar revision has been encountered during a follow-up of 4.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of the patellar component during TKA differs from one patella to another. Thus, by defining the OCPP on a patient-by-patient basis, the surgeon should be able to reproduce the functional anatomy of the native patella.

The Effect on Long-Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior-Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63,416 Prostheses from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Controversy still exists as to the optimum management of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty. Surgeons can choose to kinematically substitute the PCL with a posterior-stabilized total knee replacement or alternatively to utilize a cruciate-retaining, also known as minimally stabilized, total knee replacement. Proponents of posterior-stabilized total knee replacement propose that the reported lower survivorship in registries when directly compared with minimally stabilized total knee replacement is due to confounders such as selection bias because of the preferential usage of posterior-stabilized total knee replacement in more complex or severe cases. In this study, we aimed to eliminate these possible confounders by performing an instrumental variable analysis based on surgeon preference to choose either posterior-stabilized or minimally stabilized total knee replacement, rather than the actual prosthesis received.

METHODS

Cumulative percent revision, hazard ratio (HR), and revision diagnosis data were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from September 1, 1999, to December 31, 2014, for 2 cohorts of patients, those treated by high-volume surgeons who preferred minimally stabilized replacements and those treated by high-volume surgeons who preferred posterior-stabilized replacements. All patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and underwent fixed-bearing total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing.

RESULTS

At 13 years, the cumulative percent revision was 5.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0% to 6.2%) for the surgeons who preferred the minimally stabilized replacements compared with 6.0% (95% CI, 4.2% to 8.5%) for the surgeons who preferred the posterior-stabilized replacements. The revision risk for the surgeons who preferred posterior-stabilized replacements was significantly higher for all causes (HR = 1.45 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.63]; p < 0.001), for loosening or lysis (HR = 1.93 [95% CI, 1.58 to 2.37]; p < 0.001), and for infection (HR = 1.51 [95% CI, 1.25 to 1.82]; p < 0.001). This finding was irrespective of patient age and was evident with cemented fixation and with both cross-linked polyethylene and non-cross-linked polyethylene. However, the higher revision risk was only evident in male patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a 45% higher risk of revision for the patients of surgeons who preferred a posterior-stabilized total knee replacement compared with the patients of surgeons who preferred a minimally stabilized total knee replacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

To resurface or not to resurface the patella remains a controversy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes associated with selectively not resurfacing the patella.

METHODS

This was a historical cohort study of 15,497 patients with 21,371 primary TKA procedures performed at a single institution between 1985 and 2010. The cohort included 402 (2%) knees with unresurfaced patellae and 20,969 knees with all-polyethylene patellae designs. Reasons for not resurfacing the patella were documented. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of complications and revisions among procedures with unresurfaced patellae.

RESULTS

According to the surgeon, reasons for not resurfacing were normal cartilage (226, 56%), young patient (30, 8%), thin patella (53, 13%), and surgeons' choice (93, 23%). In age, sex, and calendar year-adjusted analyses, the risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 1.46) and all-cause revisions (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.89) were significantly higher after TKA with unresurfaced patellae. However, after adjusting for femoral component types and operative diagnoses, these associations were no longer significant. The only group with significantly worse outcomes were those with a thin patellae with increased risk of complications (HR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.70, 4.17) and revisions (HR: 5.94, 95% CI: 2.35, 15.02). Yet, the excess risk in the thin patellae group was mainly due to infections, and not related to unresurfaced patellae.

CONCLUSION

Selectively not resurfacing the patella seemed to provide similar results compared with routine resurfacing.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome differs with different outcome scores: A randomized, double-blind study of 129 knees with 3 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent research on outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has raised the question of the ability of traditional outcome measures to distinguish between treatments. We compared functional outcomes in patients undergoing TKA with and without patellar resurfacing, using the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) as the primary outcome and 3 traditional outcome measures as secondary outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

129 knees in 115 patients (mean age 70 (42-82) years; 67 female) were evaluated in this single-center, randomized, double-blind study. Data were recorded preoperatively, at 1 year, and at 3 years, and were assessed using repeated-measures mixed models.

RESULTS

The mean subscores for the KOOS after surgery were statistically significantly in favor of patellar resurfacing: sport/recreation, knee-related quality of life, pain, and symptoms. No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed with the Knee Society clinical rating system, with the Oxford knee score, and with visual analog scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction.

INTERPRETATION

In the present study, the KOOS--but no other outcome measure used--indicated that patellar resurfacing may be beneficial in TKA.

Anterior knee pain following primary total knee arthroplasty

Despite improvements in technique and technology for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), anterior knee pain impacts patient outcomes and satisfaction. Addressing the prosthetic and surgical technique related causes of pain after TKA, specifically as it relates to anterior knee pain, can aid surgeons in addressing these issues with their patients. Design features of the femoral and patellar components which have been reported as pain generators include: Improper femoral as well as patellar component sizing or designs that result in patellofemoral stuffing; a shortened trochlear groove distance from the flange to the intercondylar box; and then surgical technique related issues resulting in: Lateral patellar facet syndrome; overstuffed patella/flange combination; asymmetric patellar resurfacing, improper transverse plane component rotation resulting in patellar subluxation/tilt. Any design consideration that allows impingement of extensor mechanism anatomical elements has the possibility of impacting outcome by becoming a pain generator. As the number of TKA procedures continues to increase, it is increasingly critical to develop improved, evidence based prostheses that maximize function and patient satisfaction while minimizing pain and other complications.

Factors associated with the incidence of revision total knee arthroplasty in Korea between 2007 and 2012: an analysis of the National Claim Registry

BACKGROUND

The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in Asian countries is projected to increase with the rapid growth of primary TKA. We investigated the factors associated with the incidence of revision TKA using a nationally representative database.

METHODS

Data collected by the Health Insurance Review Agency of Korea, from 260,068 TKA patients between 2007 and 2012, were used to estimate the incidence rate and cumulative incidence of revision TKA according to age, gender, and hospital TKA and prosthesis manufacturer volume. Age, hospital, and manufacturer volume were categorized into three groups. The incidence rates and cumulative incidences of revision TKA were computed by combining age and gender, and by combining hospital and prosthesis manufacturer volume.

RESULTS

Incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were as follows: 1) by age: < 65 years, 447.2; 65-74 years, 363.7; ≥ 75 years, 270.9, 2) by gender: male, 537.8; female, 346.1; 3) by hospital volume (procedures/year): < 20, 536.9; 20-199, 432.3; ≥ 200, 300.1; and 4) by manufacturer volume (prostheses/year): < 1500, 772.3; 1500-3999, 453.9; ≥ 4000, 345.6. The revision TKA incidence rate in young males was significantly higher compared to that in elderly females. The difference in cumulative incidence, between hospitals with an annual volume of < 20 procedures and those with a volume of 20-199 procedures, was reduced for manufacturers with an annual volume of ≥ 4000. Similarly, the difference in cumulative incidence between manufacturers with an annual volume of <1500 prostheses and those with a volume of 1500-3999 prostheses was reduced in hospitals with an annual volume of ≥ 200.

CONCLUSION

Revision TKA incidence varied according to age, gender, and hospital and manufacturer volume. This data could inform clinical decisions and healthcare strategies.

Secondary patella resurfacing in painful non-resurfaced total knee arthroplasties : A study of survival and clinical outcome from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (1994-2011)

PURPOSE

In Norway, 19 % of revisions of non-resurfaced total knee arthroplasties done for knee pain between 1994 and 2011 were Secondary Patella Resurfacing (SPR). It is, however, unclear whether SPR actually resolves the pain. The aim was to investigate prostheses survival and clinical outcomes following SPR.

METHOD

A total of 308 knees (301 patients) with SPR were used to assess implant survival, and a sub-cohort (n = 114 out of 301 patients) with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data were used to assess the clinical outcomes. The EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Visual Analogue Scales on satisfaction and pain were used to collect PROM data. Outcomes were analysed by Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

The five- and ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival percentages were 91 % and 87 %, respectively. Overall, 35 knees were re-revised at a median follow-up of eight years and pain alone (10 knees) was the main cause of re-revision. Younger patients (<60 years) had nearly nine times higher risk of re-revision compared to older patients (>70 years) (RR = 8.6; p < 0.001). Mean EQ-5D index score had improved from 0.41 (SD 0.21) preoperative to 0.56 (SD 0.25) postoperative following SPR. A total of 63 % of patients with PROM data were satisfied with the outcomes of SPR.

CONCLUSION

The long-term prostheses survival following SPR was satisfactory, although not as good as for primary knee replacement. Patients' health related quality of life improved significantly following SPR. Still, more than a third of patients with PROMs data were dissatisfied with the outcomes of the SPR procedure.

Selective patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

350 knees were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of selective patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty. Knees with exposed bone on the patellar articular surface were excluded. 327 knees were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 7.8years. 114 knees followed for greater than 10 years were analyzed separately. Satisfaction was higher in patients with a resurfaced patella. In patients followed for at least 10 years, no significant difference was found. No difference was found in KSS scores or survivorship. No complications of patellar resurfacing were identified. The vast majority of patients with remaining patellar articular cartilage do very well with total knee arthroplasty regardless of patellar resurfacing. Patient satisfaction may be slightly higher with patellar resurfacing.

Failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In Norway, the proportion of revision knee arthroplasties increased from 6.9% in 1994 to 8.5% in 2011. However, there is limited information on the epidemiology and causes of subsequent failure of revision knee arthroplasty. We therefore studied survival rate and determined the modes of failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties.

METHOD

This study was based on 1,016 aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1994 and 2011. Revisions done for infections were not included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the survival rate and the relative risk of re-revision with all causes of re-revision as endpoint.

RESULTS

145 knees failed after revision total knee arthroplasty. Deep infection was the most frequent cause of re-revision (28%), followed by instability (26%), loose tibial component (17%), and pain (10%). The cumulative survival rate for revision total knee arthroplasties was 85% at 5 years, 78% at 10 years, and 71% at 15 years. Revision total knee arthroplasties with exchange of the femoral or tibial component exclusively had a higher risk of re-revision (RR = 1.7) than those with exchange of the whole prosthesis. The risk of re-revision was higher for men (RR = 2.0) and for patients aged less than 60 years (RR = 1.6).

INTERPRETATION

In terms of implant survival, revision of the whole implant was better than revision of 1 component only. Young age and male sex were risk factors for re-revision. Deep infection was the most frequent cause of failure of revision of aseptic total knee arthroplasties.

Secondary patellar resurfacing following total knee arthroplasty : A cohort study in fifty eight knees with a mean follow-up of thirty one months

PURPOSE

If anterior knee pain (AKP) emerges or persists following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) may offer relief of AKP. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes after secondary patellar resurfacing for persistent AKP. Secondary objectives were to correlate surgical outcomes with clinical and radiological parameters including 99 m-technetium bone scintigraphy.

METHODS

In this study, 57 patients (58 knees, 51 women and 6 men) with a mean age of 70 years at the time of SPR were included. Patients were asked about their satisfaction regarding the outcome of the procedure. Patellar position was assessed by axial radiographs, and we reassessed the preoperatively performed bone scintigraphy.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 31 (6-76) months, 42 patients (43 knees) were satisfied and 15 were dissatisfied regarding the outcome of the procedure. Dissatisfied patients had more often a shorter time interval between TKA and SPR, patellar tilt on axial radiographs, and a 'hot' bone scan.

CONCLUSION

In patients with persistent AKP following TKR, secondary resurfacing leads to patient satisfaction in a relatively large number of patients. Better results were seen in patients without tilting of the patella. The added value of a bone scan as an indicator to perform SPR is not clarified in the present study.

International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements

BACKGROUND

Differences in survivorship of non-posterior-stabilized compared with posterior-stabilized knee designs carry substantial economic consequences, especially with limited health-care resources. However, these comparisons have often been made between relatively small groups of patients, often with short-term follow-up, with only small differences demonstrated between the groups. The goal of this study is to compare the outcomes of non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties with use of a unique collaboration of multiple established knee arthroplasty registries.

METHODS

A distributed health data network was developed by the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries and was used in this study to reduce barriers to participation (such as security, propriety, legal, and privacy issues) compared with a centralized data warehouse approach. The study included only replacements in osteoarthritis patients who underwent total knee procedures involving fixed-bearing devices from 2001 to 2010. The outcome of interest was time to first revision.

RESULTS

On average, not resurfacing showed a more harmful effect than resurfacing did when posterior-stabilized and non-posterior-stabilized knee replacements were compared, while the risk of revision for posterior-stabilized compared with non-posterior-stabilized knees was highest in year zero to one, followed by year one to two, years eight through ten, and years two through eight. Posterior-stabilized knees did significantly worse than non-posterior-stabilized knees did when the patella was not resurfaced. This difference was most pronounced in the first two years (year zero to one: hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.56 to 2.95, p < 0.001; year one to two: HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.48 to 1.75, p < 0.001). When the patella was resurfaced, posterior-stabilized knees did significantly worse than non-posterior-stabilized knees did. This was again most pronounced in the first two years (year zero to one: HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.27 to 2.42, p = 0.001; year one to two: HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.45, p < 0.001). There was a reduced risk of revision with a patient age of more than sixty-five years (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.60, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that fixed non-posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty performed better with or without patellar resurfacing than did fixed posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. This effect was most pronounced in the first two years. The risk of revision for posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties was reduced with patellar resurfacing. Also, a patient age of more than sixty-five years and female gender reduced the risk of revision.

Patellar resurfacing in posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty (PATRES): design of a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain may occur after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patellar resurfacing, which is considered to lower the incidence of anterior knee pain after TKA, remains controversial. In the present study clinical and radiological outcomes after TKA performed on patients with clinical and radiological signs of femorotibial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) with and without patellar resurfacing will be compared.

METHODS/DESIGN

Fifty patients will be included in a randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for TKA with clinical and radiological signs of femorotibial and patellofemoral OA will be included. Arthritis of the patellofemoral joint was determined based on the preoperative Baldini and Merchant X-ray views, which is assessed by the orthopaedic surgeon who treats the patient. Exclusion criteria are rheumatoid arthritis, history of patellar fracture, tuberosity transposition, high tibial osteotomy (HTO), hip arthroplasty and posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Patients will be randomized to undergo TKA either with or without patellar resurfacing. Outcomes will be assessed preoperatively, at 6 weeks and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively. Primary outcome measure is the patellofemoral scoring system according to Baldini. Secondary outcome measures are the Knee Society clinical rating system (KSS) and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS) scores. Conventional weight-bearing radiographs, and views according to Baldini will be used to asses component loosening, wear, and patellofemoral problems including fracture or loosening of resurfaced patellae, subluxation and wear of non-resurfaced patellae.

DISCUSSION

There is no consensus regarding patellar resurfacing during primary TKA. Current prospective studies fail to determine any differences in clinical outcome among patients after TKA with or without patellar resurfacing. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to determine the effectiveness of patellar resurfacing during TKA in patients undergoing TKA who have clinical and radiological signs of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA, using a specific patellofemoral outcome measurement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Registry NTR3108.

Knee osteoarthritis and role for surgical intervention: lessons learned from randomized clinical trials and population-based cohorts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last decade, there has been increased recognition of the importance of high-quality randomized controlled trials in determining the role of surgery for knee osteoarthritis. This review highlights key findings from the best available studies, and considers whether or not this knowledge has resulted in better evidence-based care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of arthroscopy to treat knee osteoarthritis has not declined despite strong evidence-based recommendations that do not sanction its use. A large randomized controlled trial has demonstrated that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy followed by a standardized physical therapy program results in similar improvements in pain and function at 6 and 12 months in comparison to physical therapy alone in patients with knee osteoarthritis and a symptomatic meniscal tear, confirming the findings of two previous trials. Two recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that decision aids help people to reach better-informed decisions about total knee arthroplasty. A majority of studies have indicated that for people with obesity the positive results of total knee arthroplasty may be compromised by postoperative complications, particularly infection.

SUMMARY

More efforts are needed to overcome significant evidence-practice gaps in the surgical management of knee osteoarthritis, particularly arthroscopy. Decision aids are a promising tool.

The influence of kinematic conditions and design on the wear of patella-femoral replacements

The success rate of patella-femoral arthroplasty varies between 44% and 90% in 17 years of follow-up. Several studies have been performed previously for assessing the surface wear in the patella-femoral joint. However, they have not included all six degrees of freedom. The aim of this study was to develop a six-axis patella-femoral joint simulator to assess the wear rate for two patellae designs (round and oval dome) at different kinematic conditions. An increase in patellar rotation from 1° to 4° led to a significantly (p<0.049) increased wear rate of round dome from 8.6 mm³/million cycles to 12.3 mm³/million cycles. The wear rate for oval dome increased from 6.3 mm³/million cycles to 14.5 mm³/million cycles. However, the increase was nonsignificant (p>0.08). The increase in wear rate was likely due to the higher cross shear. A decrease in patellar medial lateral displacement from passive to constrained resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in wear (p>0.06). There was no significant difference in wear rate between the two patellae designs (p>0.28). The volumetric wear under all conditions was positively correlated with the level of passive patellar tilt (rho>0.8). This is the first report of preclinical wear simulation of patella-femoral joint in a six-axis simulator under different kinematic conditions.

Biological activity of polyethylene wear debris produced in the patellofemoral joint

Polyethylene wear is considered a threat to the long-term survival of total knee replacements. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution that resurfacing the patella makes to wear debris-induced osteolysis following total knee replacement. Ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene wear particles were isolated from simulator lubricant. Particle shape, size, and volume distributions were recorded allowing the osteolytic potential of the wear debris produced in the patellofemoral joint to be estimated using the concept of specific biological activity and functional biological activity. Values were compared with those reported for the tibiofemoral joint. Specific biological activity for the patellofemoral joint was not significantly different from the values for the tibiofemoral joint of total knee replacement devices, and therefore, has a similar potential to stimulate osteolytic cytokine release from macrophages. Functional biological activity was significantly lower for the patellofemoral joint compared with the tibiofemoral joint. Functional biological activity was significantly lower for the patellofemoral joint compared with the fixed bearing and rotating platform total knee replacement devices. However, as patellar resurfacing is commonly fitted as part of a total knee replacement system, this results in a 20% increase in overall functional biological activity for the system. Therefore, implanting a patellar resurfacing will increase the potential for osteolysis in the knee.

Revision surgery for patellofemoral problems: should we always resurface?

BACKGROUND

Routine patellar resurfacing performed at the time of knee arthroplasty is controversial, with some evidence of utility in both TKA (tricompartmental) and bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. However, whether one approach results in better implant survival remains unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether (1) routine patellar resurfacing in TKAs resulted in lower cumulative revision rates compared to bicompartmental knee arthroplasties, (2) patella-friendly implants resulted in lower cumulative revision rates than earlier designs, and (3) bicompartmental knee arthroplasties revised to TKAs had higher cumulative revision rates than primary TKAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a community-based joint registry, we identified 8135 patients treated with 9530 cemented, all-polyethylene patella TKAs and 627 bicompartmental knee arthroplasties without patellar resurfacing. We compared age, gender, year of index procedure, diagnosis, cruciate status, revision, and revision reason.

RESULTS

TKAs had a lower cumulative revision rate for patella-only revision than bicompartmental knee arthroplasties (0.8% versus 4.8%). Adjusting for age, bicompartmental knee arthroplasties were 6.9 times more likely to undergo patellar revision than TKAs. There was no difference in the cumulative revision rate for patella-only revisions between patella-friendly and earlier designs. The cumulative revision rate for any second revision after a patella-only revision was 12.7% for bicompartmental knee arthroplasties while that for primary TKAs was 6.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bicompartmental knee arthroplasties had higher revision rates than TKAs. Femoral component design did not influence the cumulative revision rate. Secondary patella resurfacing in a bicompartmental knee arthroplasty carried an increased revision risk compared to resurfacing at the time of index TKA. To reduce the probability of reoperation for patellofemoral problems, our data suggest the patella should be resurfaced at the time of index surgery.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Whether to resurface the patella during a primary total knee arthroplasty remains a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis through an evaluation of the current literature.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing patellar resurfacing with nonresurfacing during total knee arthroplasties was performed. The focus of this analysis was on outcomes of reoperation, anterior knee pain and knee scores.

RESULTS

Ten trials assessing 1,003 knees were eligible. The absolute risk of reoperation was reduced by 4% (95% confidence interval, 1-7%) in the patellar resurfacing arm (between-study heterogeneity, P = 0.06, I (2) = 45%), implying that one would have to resurface 25 patellae (95% confidence interval, 14-100 patellae) in order to prevent one reoperation. Only seven trials provided adequate data of anterior knee pain for a quantitative synthesis. On the basis of those seven trials, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of anterior knee pain. Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty could have multiple etiologies such as surgical factors and nonresurfaced patella is not the sole cause of this problem.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing reduce the risk of reoperation after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Not resurfacing the patella might be considered a reasonable option, but patients must accept the increased risk of reoperation for which the quantitative evidence-based synthesis is mild. Based on the evidence provided by this study and those previously published ones, the authors do not now resurface the patella as a matter of routine for patients having a primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.

Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patella resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is disputed and new prosthesis designs have been introduced without documentation of their survival. We assessed the impact on prosthesis survival of patella resurfacing and of prosthesis brand, based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

5 prosthesis brands in common use with and without patella resurfacing from 1994 through 2009 were included n = 11,887. The median follow-up times were 9 years for patella-resurfaced implants and 7 years for implants without patella resurfacing. For comparison of prosthesis brands, also brands in common use with only one of the two treatment options were included in the study population (n = 25,590). Cox regression analyses were performed with different reasons for revision as endpoints with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We observed a reduced overall risk of revision for patella resurfaced (PR) TKAs, but the statistical significance was borderline (RR = 0.84, p = 0.05). At 15 years, 92% of PR and 91% of patella non resurfaced (NR) prostheses were still unrevised. However, PR implants had a lower risk of revision due to pain alone (RR = 0.1, p < 0.001), but a higher risk of revision due to loosening of the tibial component (RR = 1.4, p = 0.03) and due to a defective polyethylene insert (RR = 3.2, p < 0.001). At 10 years, the survival for the reference NR brand AGC Universal was 93%. The NR brands Genesis I, Duracon, and Tricon (RR = 1.4-1.7) performed statistically significantly worse than NR AGC Universal, while the NR prostheses e.motion, Profix, and AGC Anatomic (RR = 0.1-0.7), and the PR prostheses NexGen and AGC Universal (RR = 0.4-0.5) performed statistically significantly better. LCS, NexGen, LCS Complete (all NR), and Tricon, Genesis I, LCS, and Kinemax (all PR) showed no differences in this respect from the reference brand. A lower risk of revision (crude) was found for TKAs performed after 2000 as compared to those performed earlier (RR = 0.8, p = 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Although revision risk was similar for PR and NR TKAs, we found important differences in reasons for revision. Our results also indicate that survivorship of TKAs has improved.