Tourniquet use in total knee replacement does not improve fixation, but appears to reduce final range of motion

Are tourniquets indicated in total knee arthroplasty in the era of tranexamic acid: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Introduction

There is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the clinical utility of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), specifically in regards to perioperative blood loss. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we aim to evaluate the clinical advantages and disadvantages associated with tourniquet use in the setting of TKA.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted through April 2017 using keywords: "tourniquet" and "total knee arthroplasty" or "total knee replacement". Perioperative variables including TXA use, blood loss, incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and wound complications were either extracted from the studies or corresponding authors were contacted. A sub-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of TXA on intraoperative and total blood loss (TBL), and VTE incidence.

Results

After review of 558 articles, 19 studies reporting outcomes in 1094 patients were analyzed. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the tourniquet cohorts compared to non-tourniquet (p < 0.01). TBL was reduced in tourniquet groups but not significantly (p = 0.08). In contrast, calculated blood loss was greater in tourniquet groups, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.43). There was a greater likelihood for wound complications and VTE among tourniquet assisted TKA, albeit only significant for the former (p = 0.01). TXA sub-analysis demonstrated intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with tourniquet use regardless of TXA implementation (p < 0.01). In studies without TXA, tourniquet patients were at greater risk of developing VTE (p = 0.08). These risks decreased with TXA administration.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates that tourniquets prevent intraoperative blood loss, yet within the postoperative period, there is no significant difference in TBL between tourniquet and non-tourniquet assisted TKA.

Level of evidence

Level II; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Intermittent tourniquet compared to throughout tourniquet use during Total Knee Arthroplasty in patients with Body Mass Index of 30 or more: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduces bleeding which optimises bone-cement interface for prosthesis stability and improves surgical field visualisation. However, prolonged usage can lead to complications and poorer outcomes. Some surgeons advocate for intermittent tourniquet application. Limited literature exists for patients with high body mass index (BMI). This study aims to compare the outcomes of intermittent tourniquet (IT) to throughout tourniquet (TT) use among obese patients undergoing primary TKA for knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. In the TT group, tourniquet was inflated from the beginning and released once the bone cement has hardened. In the IT group, tourniquet was inflated at the beginning, released after initial incision and haemostasis, then inflated again during cementation. Tourniquet was released once the bone cement had set. Categorical outcome measures were analysed using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. T-test or Kruskal-Wallis test were used for continuous data.

Results

When comparing IT to TT among patients with BMI≥30 (IT n = 48, TT n = 47), the mean duration of surgery was shorter in the TT group (p < 0.05). The difference in haemoglobin drop between the two groups was not statistically significant from post-operative day three onwards. There was no difference in transfusion rate (p > 0.05). ROM was greater in the IT group up to three weeks post-operatively (p < 0.05). When comparing patients with BMI <30 (n = 71) and BMI≥30 (n = 48) with IT use, there was no statistically significant difference in ROM and LOS.

Conclusion

Patients with BMI≥30 in the IT group had greater ROM in the initial post-operative period. Although operative time and blood loss were greater among the IT group, there was no difference in transfusion rate. Outcomes of TKA performed with IT were similar for patients with BMI≥30 and BMI <30. The authors recommend intermittent tourniquet use during TKA for patients with BMI≥30.

Level of evidence

3.

Risk factor analysis and establishment of a nomogram model to predict blood loss during total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The risk factors for excessive blood loss and transfusion during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine the risk factors for excessive blood loss and establish a predictive model for postoperative blood transfusion.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 329 patients received TKA, who were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 229) or a test set (n = 100). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for excessive blood loss. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for blood transfusion. R software was used to establish the prediction model. The accuracy and stability of the models were evaluated using calibration curves, consistency indices, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Risk factors for excessive blood loss included timing of using a tourniquet, the use of drainage, preoperative ESR, fibrinogen, HCT, ALB, and free fatty acid levels. Predictors in the nomogram included timing of using a tourniquet, the use of drainage, the use of TXA, preoperative ESR, HCT, and albumin levels. The area under the ROC curve was 0.855 (95% CI, 0.800 to 0.910) for the training set and 0.824 (95% CI, 0.740 to 0.909) for the test set. The consistency index values for the training and test sets were 0.855 and 0.824, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for excessive blood loss during and after TKA were determined, and a satisfactory and reliable nomogram model was designed to predict the risk for postoperative blood transfusion.

Impact of tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty on functional recovery and postoperative pain: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of tourniquet use only during cementation compared with its use throughout the entire surgery concerning early outcomes in functional recovery, pain, quadriceps function, and rehabilitation.

METHODS

Between November 2019 and March 2020, 118 patients were enrolled in this study, with 59 patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet during the entire surgery (group 1) and 59 patients with a tourniquet only during cementation (group 2). Twenty-eight patients were unable to complete follow-up leaving fifty in group 1 and forty in group 2. Primary endpoints were surgical time, postoperative knee and thigh pain, and functional recovery. Secondary endpoints were 6-month clinical scores and blood loss.

RESULTS

Patients in group 1 had statistically significantly increased knee pain on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.004), and thigh pain on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001), 2 (p < 0.001), and 3 (p = 0.027), and longer time intervals to achieve straight leg raise maneuver (p = 0.006) compared to group 2. However, it did not affect overall narcotic consumption, knee pain (day 1-2), functional recovery, ROM, ability to do the first walk, Oxford knee score, length of stay, and complication rate. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of 6-month postoperative knee score, surgical time, and blood loss between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Tourniquet use diminishes quadriceps function and increases postoperative thigh pain and, to a lesser extent, knee pain. We, therefore, recommend the use of a tourniquet only during cementing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1; prospective randomized study.

[Fast-Track-Arthroplasty]

INTRODUCTION

Essential components of fast-track or enhanced recovery programs in arthroplasty are the optimization of interdisciplinary organizational processes, as well as pre-, intra- and postoperative procedures in everyday clinical practice. The early postoperative mobilization of patients after joint replacement surgery is of central importance, with the aim of avoiding pain and complications. This article provides a detailed overview of fast-track procedures that have already been established in many units. Furthermore, it demonstrates the clinical advantages of FastTrack for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an evidence-based manner within the framework of a randomized study design.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

194 primary THA patients were examined after randomization into two single-blinded groups; Fast-Track (n = 98) or conventional treatment path (n = 96). Mobilization was defined as the primary outcome parameter, measured in seconds using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Secondary parameters were the achievable walking distance in meters and pain using the numerical rating scale (NRS). All parameters were recorded preoperatively and daily until the sixth postoperative day.

RESULTS

No complications or revisions were recorded within the first postoperative week. The fast-track group showed significantly better TUG values and walking distance results compared to the conventional group until the sixth postoperative day (p < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference regarding the pain assessment (NRS) (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of Fast-Track in hip arthroplasty can evidently improve short-term postoperative clinical outcomes. This first prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study showed very good clinical results with comparable pain after FastTrack THA compared to a conventional treatment path. Fast-Track concepts are highly effective in terms of early mobilization and clinical outcome-without incurring a higher risk of complications in the short term.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline Summary of Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

The Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies for surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee in skeletally mature patients. This guideline contains 16 recommendations and seven options to assist orthopaedic surgeons and all qualified physicians with the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee based on the best current available evidence. It is also intended to serve as an information resource for professional healthcare practitioners and developers of practice guidelines and recommendations. In addition to providing pragmatic practice recommendations, this guideline also highlights gaps in the literature and informs areas for future research and quality measure development.

State of the Art in Radiostereometric Analysis for Tibial Baseplate Migration and Future Research Directions

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) measures movement (migration) of a baseplate relative to the underlying tibia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and has been used extensively to evaluate safety of new implant designs and/or surgical techniques regarding baseplate loosening. Because RSA is a complex methodology which involves various choices that researchers make, including whether to use marker-based or model-based methods, which migration metric to report, how to relate short-term migrations to long-term risk, and how these choices impact error, the objectives of this review were to: (1) lay out a comprehensive structure illustrating the multiple components/considerations for RSA and their interrelations, (2) review components of the structure using the latest RSA literature, and (3) use the preceding review as a context for identifying future areas of study. The components to be reviewed were structured using the following topics: type of RSA, migration metrics, sources of error, studies/reports of error, stability limits, and studies of error in stability limits. Based on the current RSA literature and knowledge gaps which exist, the following future research directions were identified: (1) revising the ISO standard to require reporting of clinical measurement error (bias) and recommending use of a local baseplate coordinate system, (2) identifying the migration metric and associated threshold most predictive of baseplate loosening for individual patients, (3) creating a method for data sharing to improve individual patient diagnostics, and (4) determining an appropriate stability limit for model-based RSA for group stability and individual patient diagnostics.

With or without a Tourniquet? A Comparative Study on Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients without Comorbidities

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effects of tourniquet use and the complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients without comorbidities to investigate whether tourniquet application can be employed without adverse effects and to assess its impact on the occurrence of any complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 106 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were divided randomly into two groups according to whether a tourniquet was used during the surgery or not. Patients with comorbidities (except arterial hypertension) were excluded from the study. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, joint range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) score, total blood loss during and after surgery, postoperative analgesic consumption, and side effects were the main factors evaluated in the study. Results: In the tourniquet group, where the VAS scores were higher, the use of analgesics was also significantly higher. While there was no statistically significant difference in total blood loss between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups, the postoperative and occult blood losses were higher in the tourniquet group. The differences between the two groups in all other parameters were very small and not statistically significant. Conclusions: The findings of the current study suggest that when the comorbidities of patients are thoroughly documented and clarified prior to surgery, tourniquets should be applied selectively to individuals without any pre-existing health conditions.

Tourniquet use benefits to reduce intraoperative blood loss in patients receiving total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: An updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of tourniquets use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with osteoarthritis remain debated. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to further evaluate the role of tourniquets use in patients undergoing TKA for knee osteoarthritis by introducing trial sequential analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality assessment. Statistical heterogeneity across studies was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I2 statistic. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata/SE 14.0, and trail sequential analysis was performed using TSA software version 0.9.5.10 Beta. In addition, qualitative summary was also used to describe results.

RESULTS

15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1202 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that tourniquet use during TKA significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (mean difference (MD)= -123.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): -163.37 to -84.32, p < .001)and shortened operation time (MD = -4.71, 95% CI: -7.6 to -1.82, p = .001), but there were no significant differences in postoperative blood loss, calculated blood loss, total blood loss, transfusion rate (p = .939), and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) rate between the tourniquet and no-tourniquet groups. TSA confirmed that the result of operation time was false positive, but the results of other outcomes were conclusive. The results of qualitative summary showed conflicting findings in terms of pain, range of motion (RoM) and swelling ratio between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tourniquet use in patients receiving TKA for osteoarthritis benefits to reduce intraoperative blood loss but has no effect on postoperative blood loss, calculated blood loss, total blood loss, operation time, transfusion rate, and DVT rate. In addition, it remains unclear the difference between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups in terms of pain, RoM and swelling ratio.

The limited use of a tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty under a contemporary enhanced recovery protocol has no meaningful benefit: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to determine whether the limited use of tourniquets during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would be more beneficial under the contemporary enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol than the conventional use of tourniquets.

METHODS

One hundred patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA were randomly assigned to the limited tourniquet (LT, n = 51) and conventional tourniquet (CT, n = 49) groups. Operation time, serial hemoglobin drops, calculated blood loss, transfusion rate, D-dimer levels, and the presence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were assessed. In addition, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain around the knee and thigh were measured while resting during the day, at night, and during ambulation. Opioid consumption, range of motion, knee circumference, and postoperative complications were also analyzed. Isokinetic muscle strength, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores, and Euro-QoL-5D scores were also assessed before and 3 months after TKA. For statistical analysis, Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare the differences in categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t test or Mann‒Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The average tourniquet time was 46.7 min in the CT group and 5.4 min in the LT group. Knee pain on the first night after surgery was significantly higher in the CT group (3.2 vs. 4.6, p = 0.033). However, daytime pain in the thigh at 2 weeks and in the knee at 3 months after TKA were higher in the LT group than in the CT group (p = 0.048 and p = 0.036, respectively). The D-dimer level 3 months after TKA was also higher in the LT group than in the CT group (p = 0.028), but there was no difference in DVT incidence between the two groups (n.s.). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the other variables between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the limited use of tourniquets did not increase the operation time, blood loss, or transfusion rate, this study found that the limited use of tourniquets would not provide additional meaningful benefit in reducing pain and early functional restoration after TKA when applying the ERAS protocol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Are There More Radiolucent Lines in Patients Who Underwent Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without a Tourniquet During Cementation at 5 to 8 Years After Surgery?

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the presence and progression of radiolucent lines (RLLs) after cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without tourniquet use.

METHODS

There were 369 consecutive primary cemented TKAs with 5 to 8 years of follow-up. A tourniquet was used during component cementation in patients who underwent surgery from January 3, 2006, to March 31, 2010. No tourniquet was used from August 14, 2009, to October 14, 2014. There were 192 patients in the tourniquet group (TQ) and 177 patients in the no tourniquet group (NQ). Patient demographics, reoperations, and complications were recorded. RLLs were identified on anteroposterior, lateral, and skyline x-rays at 1, 2, and 5 to 8 years postoperatively using the modern knee society radiographic evaluation system. Demographics, reoperations, complications, and RLLs were compared. Age, sex, and body mass index were similar between groups. Mean tourniquet time in TQ was 11 minutes (range, 8 to 25).

RESULTS

The presence of RLLs differed between groups, with 65% of TQ knees having RLLs under any part of the prostheses versus 46% of NQ knees (P < .001). The progression of RLL >2 mm occurred in 26.0% of knees in TQ and 16.7% of knees in NQ (P = .028). There were 13 TKAs that underwent subsequent revision surgery. There was no statistically or clinically significant difference in revision rate between groups (7 revisions in TQ, 6 in NQ, P = .66).

CONCLUSION

Less RLLs were identified in NQ versus TQ. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences in revision rates between the NQ and TQ groups at 5 to 8 years.

Tourniquet application in primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify the influence of a tourniquet on the blood loss, transfusion requirement, swelling, pain, knee function, range of motion (ROM), operation time, bone cement mantle thickness, and complications in patients operated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Two authors independently retrieved PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of a tourniquet in TKA. Fixed- (I ²< 50%) or random-effects (I ²> 50%) models were selected to perform meta-analysis according to the value of I ². Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio were selected as the effect sizes for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

Results

A total of 29 RCTs, involving 2,512 operations (1,258 procedures with a tourniquet and 1,254 procedures without a tourniquet), were included, and 18 outcomes were compared. Tourniquet application could significantly decrease intraoperative blood loss (MD = -138.72 ml, p < 0.001), shorten operation duration (MD = -1.77 min, p < 0.001), and increase cement mantle thickness (MD = 0.17 mm, p < 0.001). However, it was significantly associated with increased postoperative pain intensity, decreased full ROM/flexion ROM/extension ROM, poorer knee function, increased knee swelling, and increased length of hospital stay (LOS) at several follow-up points (p < 0.050). No significant difference was found for postoperative draining volume, total blood loss, transfusion rate, change of Hb level, and risks of deep venous thrombosis and all complications.

Conclusions

Tourniquet application could only decrease the intraoperative blood loss but has no effectiveness on the total blood loss and transfusion requirement. On the contrary, it has a reverse effect on the pain score, knee function, ROM, swelling, and LOS.

Mid-term effect of total knee arthroplasty with and without tourniquet use on prosthesis survival, complications and functional outcome: A prospective cohort study of 511 total knee arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

A tourniquet is often used to create a bloodless surgical field during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is still debated whether tourniquet use improves durability of cemented implant fixation and thereby prosthesis survival. Some studies showed tourniquet application has a negative impact on post-operative wound healing, pain and function, whilst other publications contradict this. However, no previous studies evaluated the effect of tourniquet use on prosthesis survival and mid-term functional outcome specifically.

METHODS

In this longitudinal observational cohort study 115 patients (116 knees) undergoing TKA without tourniquet use were compared with 374 patients (395 knees) with a tourniquet. Prosthesis survival, revision risks and complications were analysed through chart review after ameanfollow-up period of5.3 years.Additionally, patient reported outcome measures regarding knee functionality and health status (PROMs; KOOS, OKS, EQ-5D, SF-12) werecollected prospectively.

RESULTS

Both groups had an equal overall re-operation rate of 4.3% and showed similar revision rates for aseptic loosening as well as for other causes. In the tourniquet group a higher complication rate (14.7% vs 10.3%) was observed. The majority was urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization. Both groups showed comparable, improved post-operative functional results compared to the pre-operative state for all PROMs atall timepoints.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study TKA without tourniquet use yielded similar mid-term results as TKA with tourniquet use with regard to prosthesis survival, reoperations, complications, knee functionality and health status.

Effects of the Use of Tourniquet in Total Knee Arthroplasty on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes with 5 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The use of tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had a lot of controversies with no clear agreement about the advantages and disadvantages of tourniquet. This study aims to show the effects of tourniquet use in TKA on the functional and clinical outcomes with follow-up of 5 years. This is a randomized, double-blind, and single-center study of 101 patients who were treated by TKA and divided randomly into two groups. Tourniquet was used in group A and was not used in group B. Both groups were assessed by Knee Society score (KSS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score for thigh pain, and postoperative complications. Both groups were followed up for 5 years. The group of no tourniquet showed significant better functional outcomes measured by KSS at postoperative periods of 2 weeks (p = 0.001), 6 weeks (p = 0.006), and 3 months (p = 0.034), and KOOS at postoperative periods of 2 weeks (p = 0.001), 6 weeks (p =0.001), and 3 months (p = 0.016). However, there was no significant difference in long-term follow-up of 5 years. There were significantly better results with use of tourniquet regarding surgeon's visualization during surgery, less operative time, and less calculated blood loss, while significantly better results with no use of tourniquet were reported regarding less hospital stay, less postoperative analgesic consumption, and less postoperative thigh pain measured by VAS score at postoperative periods of day 1 (p = 0.001), day 5 (p = 0.001), 2 weeks (p = 0.001), and 6 weeks (p = 0.001). Regarding postoperative blood transfusion and clinical deep venous thrombosis, there was no significant difference between use of tourniquet or not. The evidence presented in this level-1 randomized controlled trial suggests that no use of tourniquet in TKA can improve functional outcomes in early postoperative period with no significant difference on functional outcome at 5 years of follow-up.

Effects of Tourniquet Application on Faster Recovery after Surgery and Ischemia-Reperfusion Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty, Cementation through Closure versus Full-Course and Nontourniquet Group

Pneumatic tourniquets are used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for surgical field visualization and improved cementation; however, their use is controversial. This study aimed to assess the effects of tourniquet application on faster recovery post-TKA. Our hypothesis was that inflammation and limb function would be similar with different tourniquet applications. A prospective randomized double-blinded trial assessed tourniquets effects on postoperative pain, swelling, and early outcome in TKA. In present study, 50 TKAs were enrolled in each group as follows: full course (FC), cementation through closure (CTC), and no tourniquet (NT), CTC as treatment group while FC and NT as control groups. Topical blood samples of 3 mL from the joint cavity and drainage bags were obtained at special time point. At last, all samples such as tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), pentraxin 3 (PTX3), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), and myoglobin (Mb) were detected by ELISA. Active and passive range of motion (ROM) values, pain score by the visual analog scale (VAS), change of thigh circumference were recorded at special time point as well. In topical blood, the change of inflammatory factors, such as TNF-a, PTX3, CCL2, PGE2, SOD1, and Mb, was lower in CTC and NT groups than in FC group (p < 0.01 and 0.05). Although VAS and ROM were comparable preoperatively in three groups (p > 0.05), the perimeter growth rate was lower, pain scores (VAS) were reduced, and ROM values were improved in CTC and NT groups compared with FC group at T4, T5, and T6 postoperatively (p < 0.01 and 0.05). Improved therapeutic outcome was observed in the CTC group, indicating patients should routinely undergo TKA with cementation through closure tourniquet application.

Blood Transfusion can be Avoided in Single-Anesthetic Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Female gender and surgical drain use have been associated with an increased transfusion risk following single-anesthetic bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA). This study evaluated allogenic blood transfusion rates among female and male patients undergoing SBTKA with intraoperative tourniquet, tranexamic acid and contemporary blood transfusion thresholds but without surgical drain use.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review for 125 consecutive patients undergoing SBTKA (250 knees) between May 1, 2015 and July 10, 2021. Patient demographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists), preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, perioperative transfusions, operative time, and hospital length of stay were compared between 76 female (60.8%) and 49 male (39.2%) patient cohorts using paired Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test with a P value <.05 for significance.

RESULTS

No patient in either gender-based cohort received a perioperative allogeneic or autologous blood transfusion (P = 1). There were no significant differences in patient demographic features or medical comorbidities. Male patients had significantly higher mean preoperative (14.7 versus 13.7 g/dL, P < .01) and postoperative (12.7 versus 11.8 g/dL, P < .01) hemoglobin levels and a shorter mean hospital length of stay (2.5 versus 3.0 days, P < .01). There was no difference in the mean operative time (154.7 versus 150.7 minutes, P = .34) or change in the hemoglobin level (2.1 versus 1.9 g/dL, P = .27).

CONCLUSION

SBTKA can be performed with a limited risk of perioperative transfusion with a combination of intraoperative tourniquet, tranexamic acid, conservative blood transfusion criteria, and avoidance of postoperative drain use. Study results were not influenced by patient gender.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.

Cryoneurolysis Is a Safe, Effective Modality to Improve Rehabilitation after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Although long term pain and mobility outcomes in total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are successful, many patients experience significant amount of debilitating pain during the immediate post-operative period that necessitates narcotic use. Percutaneous cryoneurolysis to the infrapatellar saphenous and anterior femoral cutaneous nerves may help to better restore function and rehabilitation after surgery while limiting narcotic consumption. A retrospective chart review of primary TKA patients receiving pre-operative cryoneurolysis from 2019 to 2020 was performed to assess total opioid morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed inpatient and at interval follow-up. Demographics and medical comorbidities were compared between cryoneurolysis and age-matched control patients to assess baseline characteristics. Functional rehabilitation outcomes, including knee range of motion (ROM), ambulation distance, and Boston AM-PAC scores, as well as patient reported outcomes using the KOOS JR and SF-12 scores were analyzed using STATA 17 Software. The analysis included 29 cryoneurolysis and 28 age-matched control TKA patients. Baseline demographics and operative technique were not significant between groups. Although not statistically significant, cryoneurolysis patients had a shorter length of stay (2.5 vs. 3.5 days) and overall less inpatient and outpatient MME requirements. Cryoneurolysis patients had statistically significant improved 6-week ROM and 1-year follow-up KOOS JR and SF-12 mental scores compared to the control. There were no differences in complication rates. Cryoneurolysis is a safe, effective treatment modality to improve active functional recovery and patient satisfaction after TKA by reducing MME requirements. Patients who underwent cryoneurolysis had on average fewer MME prescribed during the perioperative period, improved active ROM, and improved patient-reported outcomes with no associated increased risk of infections, deep vein thrombosis, or neurologic complications.

A Randomized Controlled Study on the Use of Tourniquet in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

 The use and the optimal timing of tourniquet during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Most previous studies failed to show clinically significant differences in different strategies. The aim of this study was to determine how three strategies of tourniquet application affect the outcome in TKA patients.

METHODS

 This was a prospective randomized controlled study. Patients who undergo TKA were randomized into one of the three groups (1:1:1 ratio): tourniquet inflated from skin incision to cement hardening, tourniquet from cement application to hardening, and tourniquet from skin incision to skin closure. The perioperative blood loss, limb swelling, and complications were recorded. The level of hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, creatine kinase (CK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were determined. Patients' thigh and TKA wound pain, Knee Society knee score (KSKS) and Knee Society functional assessment (KSFA) scores, and rehabilitation parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

 A total of 90 patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were comparable. We only found significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss (skin to cement: 58.7 ± 36.1 mL, cement-only: 147.8 ± 107.9 mL, skin to skin: 16.3 ± 13.1 mL, p < 0.0001). There were no statistical differences in postoperative drainage, thigh/knee circumference, change of hemoglobin/hematocrit, CRP, IL-6, CK, and LDH on day 1 to day 4 after surgery. The thigh/TKA wound Visual Analogue Scale scores, KSKS score, KSFA score, and rehabilitation parameters were not significantly different at up to 6-month follow-up. No thromboembolic events were noted.

CONCLUSION

 Our results revealed that there was no best tourniquet strategy in TKA. Different tourniquet methods can be utilized based on surgeon preference without affecting outcomes.

[Perioperative management in fast-track arthroplasty]

The optimization of organizational processes, as well as surgical procedures intra- and perioperatively, are essential components with respect to fast-track programs in clinical routine. Treatment concepts focus on early postoperative mobilization of patients after joint replacement surgery in an interdisciplinary setting to avoid pain and complications on a scientific basis. This article gives a comprehensive and detailed overview regarding evidence-based peri- and intraoperative fast-track treatment methods: from pain treatment with intraoperative local infiltration analgesia and tranexamic acid application under minimally invasive surgical approach in short-lasting spinal anesthesia to renunciation of drains, regional pain- and urinary catheters, tourniquets, and restrictions.

Association of Use of Tourniquets During Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly Patients With Post-operative Pain and Return to Function

Objective

During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), tourniquet may negatively impact post-operative functional recovery. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tourniquet on pain and return to function.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to February 15th, 2020. Search terms included; total knee arthroplasty, tourniquet, and randomized controlled trial. RCTs evaluating the efficacies of tourniquet during and after operation were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Effect estimates with 95% CIs were pooled using the random-effects model. Dichotomous data were calculated as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used to measure the impact of consecutive results. Primary outcomes were the range of motion (ROM) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.

Results

Thirty-three RCTs involving a total of 2,393 patients were included in this study. The mean age is 65.58 years old. Compared to no tourniquet group, the use of a tourniquet resulted in suppressed ROM on the 3rd post-operative day [MD, −4.67; (95% CI, −8.00 to −1.35)] and the 1st post-operative month [MD, −3.18; (95% CI, −5.92 to −0.44)]. Pain increased significantly when using tourniquets on the third day after surgery [MD, 0.39; (95% CI, −0.19 to 0.59)]. Moreover, tourniquets can reduce intra-operative blood loss [MD, −127.67; (95% CI, −186.83 to −68.50)], shorter operation time [MD, −3.73; (95% CI, −5.98 to −1.48)], lower transfusion rate [RR, 0.85; (95% CI, 0.73–1.00)], higher superficial wound infection rates RR, 2.43; [(5% CI, 1.04–5.67)] and higher all complication rates [RR, 1.98; (95% CI, 1.22–3.22)].

Conclusion

Moderate certainty evidence shows that the use of a tourniquet was associated with an increased risk of higher superficial wound infection rates and all complication rates. Therefore, the findings did not support the routine use of a tourniquet during TKA.

Lower tourniquet pressure does not affect pain nor knee-extension strength in patients after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The use of a tourniquet in total knee replacement has advantages and drawbacks. Some studies suggest that using ischaemia at low pressures could reduce its negative effects. Our objective is to verify whether the use of ischaemia at low pressures (100 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure) produces greater pain and loss of strength than surgery without a tourniquet.

METHODS

By the means of a prospective randomized clinical trial, patients were assigned to the control group (no tourniquet, NT) or the experimental group (tourniquet, T). The main variables measured were pain (VAS) and isometric muscle strength (preoperatively, 10 days and 3 months after surgery). Secondary variables were haemoglobin at 24 h, transfusion index, need for rescue drugs and days of admission.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients (73 prosthesis) were studied. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of age, body mass index, sex ratio, preoperative strength and level of anesthetic risk. We did not find significative differences in any of the main variables (pain and strength) nor in the secondary ones. We could only find differences in the days of admission (2.77 vs. 3.05; p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a tourniquet at low pressures (100 mmHg above systolic blood pressure) did not result in an increase in postoperative pain or a decrease in quadriceps extension force within the first 3 months after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1-Randomized controlled trial.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not alleviate tourniquet-induced acute ischemia-reperfusion injury in mouse skeletal muscles

During tourniquet application, blood flow is restricted to a limb to stop excessive limb hemorrhage in a trauma setting and to create a bloodless operating field in the surgical setting. During tourniquet-related ischemia, aerobic respiration stops, and ATP is depleted, and during subsequent reperfusion, there is an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and other endogenous substances, which leads to acute ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injuries, including tissue necrosis and skeletal muscle contractile dysfunction. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy can increase the arterial oxygen tension in the tissues of patients with general hypoxia/anoxia, including carbon monoxide poisoning, circulatory arrest, and cerebral and myocardial ischemia. Here, we studied the protective effects of HBO pretreatment with 100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA against tourniquet/IR injury in mice. After one hour of HBO therapy with 100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA was administered to C57/BL6 mice, a rubber band was placed at the hip joint of the unilateral hindlimb to induce 3 h of ischemia and then released for 48 h of reperfusion. We analyzed gastrocnemius muscle morphology and contractile function and measured the levels of ATP and ROS accumulation in the muscles. HBO pretreatment did not improve tourniquet/IR-injured gastrocnemius muscle morphology and muscle contraction. Tourniquet/IR mice with HBO pretreatment showed no increase in ATP levels in IR tissues, but they did have a decreased amount of ROS accumulation in the muscles, compared to IR mice with no HBO pretreatment. These data suggest that one hour of HBO pretreatment with 100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA increases the antioxidant response to lower ROS accumulation but does not increase ATP levels in IR muscles and improve tourniquet/IR-injured muscle morphology and contractile function.

Outcomes of Tourniquet-Less Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

INTRODUCTION

A tourniquet is routinely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to limit perioperative blood loss and increase the visibility of the surgeon's field of view. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative clinical outcomes and complications associated with tourniquet use in revision TKA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 1,904 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA. Propensity score-based matching was done to adjust for baseline differences in patient demographics and procedure details.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching resulted in a cohort of 548 revision total joint arthroplasty patients, 274 (50.0%) of whom were tourniquet patients matched to 274 (50.0%) tourniquet-less patients. Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that, compared with the tourniquet-less cohort, the tourniquet cohort had significantly less intraoperative (413.7 to 353.2 mL, P < 0.01) and total perioperative (1,548.7 to 1,417.8 mL, P < 0.01) blood loss. However, no significant differences were present in total perioperative (8.4%, 6.6%, P = 0.43) transfusion rates. The tourniquet cohort had increased length of stay (3.2 to 3.7 days, P < 0.001) and 30-day readmissions (P = 0.04).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that although omitting the tourniquet in revision TKA leads to markedly increased perioperative blood loss, notable differences in perioperative transfusion rates were not observed. Furthermore, revision TKA without tourniquet use was associated with reduced postoperative length of stay, 30-day readmissions, and increased range of flexion.

Use of a Tourniquet and Spinal Anesthesia Increases Satisfactory Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually performed successfully with or without a tourniquet and under spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA). However, 10% to 34% of patients experience dissatisfaction and pain after TKA. We aimed to compare the effects of tourniquet use and SA or GA on TKA outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 404 patients to 4 study groups: SA without a tourniquet (NT/SA), SA with a tourniquet (T/SA), GA without a tourniquet (NT/GA), and GA with a tourniquet (T/GA). The primary outcome was the change in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included a satisfactory TKA outcome assessed using the OKS minimal important change (MIC) and OKS patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), adverse events, and quality of life using the 15-dimensional health-related quality of life tool.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the OKS was obtained for 381 patients. In the 2-group comparisons, the tourniquet did not affect the OKS improvement. The SA group had more substantial improvement in the OKS than the GA group (16.21 compared with 14.08 a mean difference of 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 3.71; p = 0.008). In the 4-group comparisons, the T/SA group had more substantial improvements in the OKS than the NT/GA group (16.87 compared with 13.65, a mean difference of 3.2; 95% CI, 0.28 to 6.17; p = 0.026). The SA group reached the OKS MIC more frequently than the GA group (91.7% compared with 81.7%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.49 [95% CI, 1.32 to 4.69]; p = 0.005). The SA group also reached the OKS PASS more frequently than the GA group (86.0% compared with 75.7%; OR = 2.00 [95% CI, 1.18 to 3.39]; p = 0.010). The T/SA group had significantly more patients reaching the OKS MIC than the NT/GA group (95.7% compared with 79.6%; p = 0.005) and more patients reaching the OKS PASS than the NT/GA group (92.6% compared with 74.5%; p = 0.004). No differences were seen with respect to adverse events in any comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

The tourniquet had no detrimental effects on the outcomes of TKA. SA had a positive effect on the OKS. The use of SA combined with a tourniquet resulted in the best improvement in OKS and the highest proportion of satisfactory outcomes with TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Safety of Total Knee Arthroplasty without Using a Tourniquet in Elderly Patients

This study retrospectively compared the perioperative bleeding, hemodynamics, and clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with and without a tourniquet between two age groups. We grouped 103 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA based on age at surgery: <76 years and ≥76 years. Tourniquet was used for TKA until March 2010 and stopped thereafter; hence, the patients were further classified according to TKA performed with or without a tourniquet. The differences in the operation time; perioperative bleeding; estimated bleeding; and hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Ht) levels immediately, 1 day, and 7 days postoperatively were evaluated. The clinical outcomes for range of motion, and Knee Society Knee Scores preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively were assessed. Operation time was longer in the ≥76-year-old non-tourniquet group. No difference was observed in estimated bleeding among the groups. Changes in the Hb and Ht levels at postoperative days 1 and 7 were negatively correlated with age but were not different for TKA performed with or without a tourniquet in the ≥76-year-old-patient group. There were no differences in clinical outcomes among the groups. TKA can be performed with or without a tourniquet in patients aged ≥ 76 years with careful assessment of postoperative anemia.

Early migration of a medially stabilized total knee arthroplasty : a radiostereometric analysis study up to two years

Aims

Medial pivot (MP) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were designed to mimic native knee kinematics with their deep medial congruent fitting of the tibia to the femur almost like a ball-on-socket, and a flat lateral part. GMK Sphere is a novel MP implant. Our primary aim was to study the migration pattern of the tibial tray of this TKA.

Methods

A total of 31 patients were recruited to this single-group radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study and received a medial pivot GMK Sphere TKA. The distributions of male patients versus female patients and right versus left knees were 21:10 and 17:14, respectively. Mean BMI was 29 kg/m² (95% confidence interval (CI) 27 to 30) and mean age at surgery was 63 years (95% CI 61 to 66). Maximum total point motions (MTPMs), medial, proximal, and anterior translations and transversal, internal, and varus rotations were calculated at three, 12, and 24 months. Patient-reported outcome measure data were also retrieved.

Results

MTPMs at three, 12, and 24 months were 1.0 mm (95% CI 0.8 to 1.2), 1.3 mm (95% CI 0.9 to 1.7), and 1.4 mm (0.8 to 2.0), respectively. The Forgotten Joint Score was 79 (95% CI 39 to 95) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score obtained at two years was 94 (95% CI 81 to 100), 86 (95% CI 75 to 93), 94 (95% CI 88 to 100), 69 (95% CI 48 to 88), and 81 (95% CI59 to 100) for Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport & Recreation, and Quality of Life, respectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found that the mean increase in MTPM was lower than 0.2 mm between 12 and 24 months and thus apparently stable. Yet the GMK Sphere had higher migration at one and two years than anticipated. Based on current RSA data, we therefore cannot conclude on the long-term performance of the implant, pending further assessment.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):737–744.

Effect of tourniquet application on cement penetration in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Background

Tourniquet application is expected to improve surgery exposure and cementation process in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but its effectiveness remains controversial and needs to be further explored. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of tourniquet in primary TKA. The hypothesis is that the tourniquet application affects the cement penetration in TKA.

Methods

A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for the potentially eligible articles. Two independent researchers reviewed the articles retrieved against the pre-designed inclusion and exclusion criteria. In primary TKA, cement penetration was assessed, and the data between the tourniquet-assisted and non-tourniquet-assisted TKAs were compared. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 non-randomized controlled trials (involving 675 patients) were included. There was no significant difference between the tourniquet-assisted and non-tourniquet-assisted TKAs in terms of cement penetration (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the total surgical time, blood loss, blood transfusion, the Knee Society Score, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) between the two kinds of procedures (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Tourniquet application may not affect cement penetration in primary TKA and may not help reduce blood loss, ease knee pain or improve the knee function. A surgeon may choose to use a tourniquet or not according to his or her own preference.

Level of Evidence

Level Ib, meta-analysis.

The Effects of Tourniquet Application in Total Knee Arthroplasty on the Recovery of Thigh Muscle Strength and Clinical Outcomes

The present randomized controlled study aims to evaluate whether tourniquet application during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has an effect on (1) thigh muscle strength (quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength) and (2) clinical outcomes (postoperative knee range of motion [ROM], postoperative pain level, and Knee Society Score [KSS]). The effects of tourniquet application during TKA were investigated in 65 patients randomly allocated to one of two groups: TKA with a tourniquet and TKA without a tourniquet. Patients in both groups were comparable in terms of the demographic and clinical data (p > 0.05 for age, number of patients, sex, radiographic gonarthrosis grade, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification, and body mass index [BMI]). All patients in both groups were operated by the same surgeon using one type of prosthesis. Isokinetic muscle strength (peak torque and total work) of knee extensors (quadriceps) and flexors (hamstrings) was measured in Newton meters (Nm) using a CYBEX 350 isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC/CYBEX 2009, Stoughton, MA). The combined KSS (knee score + function score), visual analog scale (VAS), and knee ROM were measured preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively to evaluate clinical outcomes. There were no significant differences between the two groups in preoperative and postoperative values of isokinetic muscle strength (peak torque and total work) and aforementioned clinical outcomes (p < 0.05). The present study has shown that quadriceps strength and clinical outcomes were not improved in the early postoperative period (3 months) when a tourniquet was not used during TKA.

Tourniquet Use Improves Cement Penetration and Reduces Radiolucent Line Progression at 5 Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although the effect of tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on functional outcomes is controversial, there are little data examining cement penetration and implant stability. This study examines the effect of tourniquet use on cement penetration and radiolucent line (RLL) progression.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty with a single surgeon, implant, and cement with minimum 5-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Tourniquet use was defined as 30 minutes minimum, while no tourniquet was 0 minutes. Patients were 1:1 matched (n = 61 per group) by age (±5), gender, body mass index (±5), and follow-up (±2 years). Cement penetration and RLL were measured on the tibia at 6 weeks, and RLL at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System.

RESULTS

Cement penetration was significantly increased in the tourniquet group in anterior-posterior zones 1 (2.16 vs 1.03 mm, P < .0005), 2 (2.23 vs 1.51 mm, P < .0005), and 5 (8.56 vs 6.3 mm, P = .009), and lateral zones 1 (2.89 vs 2.17 mm, P < .0005), 2 (2.86 vs 2.12 mm, P < .0005), 3P (3.99 vs 3.5 mm, P = .039), and 5 (8.18 vs 5.93 mm, P = .006). Cumulative cement penetration averaged 34.48 vs 43.33 mm in the tourniquet group (P < .005). Progression of RLL >2 mm was observed in 27.8% (17/61) vs 11.4% (7/61) of patients in the tourniquet group (P < .005). There were 2 failures for aseptic tibial loosening in the no tourniquet group.

CONCLUSION

Tourniquet use improves cement penetration and reduces RLL progression. Dryer surfaces during cementation may improve penetration, resulting in superior initial fixation strength and potentially reducing the long-term risk of aseptic loosening.

Effect of Tourniquet Use on Patient Outcomes After Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Tourniquet use is common in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but debate exists regarding its use and effect on patient outcomes. The study purpose was to compare the effect of short tourniquet (ST) time vs long tourniquet (LT) time on pain, opioid consumption, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively randomized to an ST time of 10 min vs LT time. A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary cementless robotic-assisted TKA underwent randomization, with 5 patients unable to complete follow-up, leaving 49 in the ST group and 46 in the LT cohort. Visual analog scale pain scores, morphine equivalent, serum creatine kinase, distance walked, range of motion, length of stay (LOS), surgical time, hemoglobin (Hgb), and Knee Society Scores (KSS) were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

Visual analog scale pain was statistically equivalent at 24, 48, and 72 hours and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Morphine equivalent consumption was 36 vs 44 (P = .03), 48 vs 50 (P = .72), 31 vs 28 (P = .57), and 4.7 vs 5.5 (P = .75) in the LT vs ST cohorts at 24 hours, 48 hours, 2weeks, and 6weeks postoperatively. Change in Hgb postoperative day 1 was 2.7 in both groups (P = .975). Postoperative day 1 creatine kinase-MB was 3.7 and 3.0 (P = .30) in LT and ST cohorts. Six-week postoperative KSS Knee and Function scores were 82.4 and 70.5 in LT group vs 80.8 and 72.3 in ST group (P = .61 and P = .63). Postoperative range of motion, LOS, and surgical time were equivalent.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates no significant advantage of ST use in primary TKA with respect to opioid consumption, patient-reported pain, KSS scores, LOS, or postoperative Hgb level.

Does the Use of a Tourniquet Influence Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common practice which may improve visualization of the surgical field and reduce blood loss. However, the safety and efficacy associated with tourniquet use continues to be a subject of debate among orthopedic surgeons. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of tourniquet use on pain and opioid consumption after TKA.

METHODS

This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial among patients undergoing TKA. Patients were preoperatively randomized to undergo TKA with or without the use of an intraoperative tourniquet. Frequency distributions, means, and standard deviations were used to describe baseline patient demographics (age, gender, race, body mass index, smoking status), length of stay, surgical factors, visual analog scale pain scores, and opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents.

RESULTS

A total of 327 patients were included in this study, with 166 patients undergoing TKA without a tourniquet and 161 patients with a tourniquet. A statistically significant difference was found in surgical time (97.87 vs 92.98 minutes; P = .05), whereas none was found for length of stay (1.73 vs 1.70 days; P = .87), postop visual analog scale pain scores (1.73 vs 1.70; P = .87), inpatient opioid consumption (19.84 vs 19.27 morphine milligram equivalents; P = .74), or outpatient opioid consumption between the tourniquet-less and tourniquet cohorts, respectively. There were no readmissions in either cohort during the 90-day episode of care.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of a tourniquet during TKA has minimal impact on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption when compared with patients who underwent TKA without a tourniquet.

Effect of tourniquet use on the risk of revision in total knee replacement surgery: an analysis of the National Joint Registry Data Set

OBJECTIVE

Tourniquet use in total knee replacement (TKR) is believed to improve the bone-cement interface by reducing bleeding, potentially prolonging implant survival. This study aimed to compare the risk of revision for primary cemented TKR performed with or without a tourniquet.

DESIGN

We analysed data from the National Joint Registry (NJR) for all primary cemented TKRs performed in England and Wales between April 2003 and December 2003. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression were used to assess the influence of tourniquet use, age at time of surgery, sex and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification on risk of revision for all-causes.

RESULTS

Data were available for 16 974 cases of primary cemented TKR, of which 16 132 had surgery with a tourniquet and 842 had surgery without a tourniquet. At 10 years, 3.8% had undergone revision (95% CI 2.6% to 5.5%) in the no-tourniquet group and 3.1% in the tourniquet group (95% CI 2.8% to 3.4%). After adjusting for age at primary surgery, gender and primary ASA score, the HR for all-cause revision for cemented TKR without a tourniquet was 0.82 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.18).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence that using a tourniquet for primary cemented TKR offers a clinically important or statistically significant reduction in the risk of all-cause revision up to 13 years after surgery. Surgeons should consider this evidence when deciding whether to use a tourniquet for cemented TKR.

Effect of Tourniquet Use During Surgical Treatment of Open Fractures

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate whether tourniquet use, with the resultant ischemia and reperfusion, during surgical treatment of an open lower-extremity fracture was associated with an increased risk of complications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 1,351 patients who had an open lower-extremity fracture at or distal to the proximal aspect of the tibia and who participated in the FLOW (Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds) trial. The independent variable was intraoperative tourniquet use, and the primary outcome measures were adjudicated unplanned reoperation within 1 year of the injury and adjudicated nonoperative wound complications.

RESULTS

Unplanned reoperation and nonoperative wound complications were roughly even between the no-tourniquet (18.7% and 19.1%, respectively) and tourniquet groups (17.8% and 20.8%) (p = 0.78 and p = 0.52). Following matching, as determined by model interactions, tourniquet use was a significant predictor of unplanned reoperation in Gustilo Type-IIIA (odds ratio, 3.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 11.78) and IIIB fractures (odds ratio, 16.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.15 to 355.40).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that tourniquet use did not influence the likelihood of complications following surgical treatment of an open lower-extremity fracture. However, in cases of severe open fractures, tourniquet use was associated with increased odds of unplanned reoperation; surgeons should be cautious with regard to tourniquet use in this setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tourniquet use in lower limb trauma and fracture surgery

The use of tourniquets in lower limb trauma surgery to control bleeding and improve the surgical field is a long established practice. In this article, we review the evidence relating to harms and benefits of tourniquet use in lower limb fracture fixation surgery and report the results of a survey on current tourniquet practice among trauma surgeons in the UK.

Tourniquet use during knee arthroplasty: A Bayesian network meta-analysis on pain, function, and thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The role of a tourniquet for knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The present Bayesian network meta-analysis investigated the role of various protocols for tourniquet inflation for knee arthroplasty, assessing data on pain control, clinical and functional outcomes, and the rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In March 2021, all clinical trials investigating the role of tourniquet use for knee arthroplasty were considered for inclusion. Groups were divided into those which used a tourniquet in knee arthroplasty procedures versus those which completed the procedure without tourniquet, or with varying protocols of tourniquet use. The hierarchical random-effects model analysis was adopted in all comparisons.

RESULTS

Data from 54 articles (5497 procedures) were retrieved. The absence of tourniquet group evidenced the lowest rate of DVT, and scored the lowest in the visual analogic scale (VAS) at 24-48 h, 1, 3, and 12 months follow-up. The same group evidenced the greatest gain of motion at 3-days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up, and the highest Knee Society Rating System scores at 1, 3, and 12 months follow-up. Of the outcome data assessed, the straight-leg-raise test was markedly inconsistent: therefore, no recommendations from this test can be made.

CONCLUSION

With regards to the endpoints considered in the present study, knee arthroplasties undertaken without the use of a tourniquet perform better overall.

Time to reconsider the routine use of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty surgery

Aims

Many surgeons choose to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is a device that fits around the leg and restricts blood flow to the limb. There is a need to understand whether tourniquets are safe, and if they benefit, or harm, patients. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in TKA surgery.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and trial registries up to 26 March 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Outcomes included: pain, function, serious adverse events (SAEs), blood loss, implant stability, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay.

Results

We included 41 RCTs with 2,819 participants. SAEs were significantly more common in the tourniquet group (53/901 vs 26/898, tourniquet vs no tourniquet respectively) (risk ratio 1.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 2.73). The mean pain score on the first postoperative day was 1.25 points higher (95% CI 0.32 to 2.19) in the tourniquet group. Overall blood loss did not differ between groups (mean difference 8.61 ml; 95% CI -83.76 to 100.97). The mean length of hospital stay was 0.34 days longer in the group that had surgery with a tourniquet (95% CI 0.03 to 0.64) and the mean duration of surgery was 3.7 minutes shorter (95% CI -5.53 to -1.87).

Conclusion

TKA with a tourniquet is associated with an increased risk of SAEs, pain, and a marginally longer hospital stay. The only finding in favour of tourniquet use was a shorter time in theatre. The results make it difficult to justify the routine use of a tourniquet in TKA surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):830–839.

[Fast track in hip and knee arthroplasty]

Fast-track treatment concepts were developed decades ago in general and abdominal surgery and have been adapted in recent years for the special requirements of hip and knee arthroplasty. In this field, Hendrik Husted in particular was able to demonstrate scientific evidence for the components of fast-track concepts. The primary aim is not so much to shorten the patient's hospital length of stay (LOS) but rather to effectively increase the quality of medical treatment for the patient and to reduce complications. The optimization of organizational processes as well as intraoperative and perioperative surgical approaches are essential components regarding the introduction of fast track into the clinical routine. This article gives a comprehensive overview of fast-track treatment concepts and explains the scientific principles for the approach.

Effects of tourniquet use on clinical outcomes and cement penetration in TKA when tranexamic acid administrated: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The role of a tourniquet is still controversial for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our current study was performed to determine whether the nonuse of the tourniquet combine with tranexamic acid (TXA) application in TKA patients with end-stage osteoarthritis would accelerate the perioperative recovery rate and provide enough cement mantle thickness for implant fixation.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 150 end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients receiving TKA were divided into three groups: group A (tourniquet group), group B (non-tourniquet group), and group C (tourniquet in cementation group). All enrolled patients received 3 g of intravenous TXA and 1 g topical TXA. The primary outcomes included blood loss variables and transfusion values. The secondary outcomes included VAS pain score, inflammatory factors level, range of motion, HSS score, postoperative hospital stay, and complication. Furthermore, by using a digital linear tomosynthesis technique, tibial baseplate bone cement mantle thickness was measured in four zones based on the knee society scoring system.

Results

No significant difference was found among the three groups with regards to total blood loss, transfusion, and complication. However, patients in group B showed lower inflammatory factors levels, shorter length of hospital stay, better range of motion, and lower postoperative pain. No significant difference was found among the three groups in four zones in terms of bone cement mantle thickness.

Conclusions

For end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients, the absence of tourniquet did not appear to affect blood loss and cement penetration in TKA patients. Furthermore, less inflammation reaction and better knee function can be achieved without a tourniquet. We recommend no longer use a tourniquet in primary TKA for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis when TXA is administrated.

Trial registration

ChiCTR-INR-16009026.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level I.

Impact of tourniquet during knee arthroplasty: a bayesian network meta-analysis of peri-operative outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The role of tourniquet during knee arthroplasty is controversial. The present study compares various tourniquet protocols using a Bayesian network meta-analysis of peri-operative data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health interventions. The literature search was conducted in September 2020. All clinical trials investigating the role of tourniquet in knee arthroplasty were considered for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using Review Manager 5.3. A Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis was used in all comparisons.

RESULTS

Ultimately, pooled data from 68 studies (7413 procedures) were analysed. Significant inconsistency was found in the data relating to total estimated blood lost; no assumption could be made on this outcome. Full-time tourniquet resulted in the shortest surgical duration and lowest intra-operative blood lost, in both cases followed by incision-to-suture. The incision-to-suture protocol achieved the smallest drop in haemoglobin during the first 72 h post-operatively and the lowest rate of blood transfusion, both followed by full-time tourniquet. Hospitalisation was shortest in the absence (no-tourniquet) group, followed by the cementation-to-end group.

CONCLUSION

For knee arthroplasty, longer tourniquet use is associated with the shorter duration of surgery, lower intra-operative blood lost, lower drops in haemoglobin and fewer transfusion units. The shortest average hospitalisation was associated with no tourniquet use.

Effects of tourniquet application on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and ischemia-reperfusion post-total knee arthroplasty: Full- versus second half-course application

PURPOSE

Pneumatic tourniquets are used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for surgical field visualization and improved cementation; however, their use is controversial. This study aimed to assess the effects of tourniquet application on enhanced recovery post-TKA.

METHODS

A prospective randomized single-blinded trial assessed tourniquet's effects on postoperative pain, swelling, and early outcome in TKA. One-hundred and two patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to full-course (FC) and second half-course (SHC) application (n = 51/group). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), C-C motif chemokine ligand 2(CCL-2), pentraxin-3 (PTX-3), prostaglandin E-2 (PGE-2), superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD-1), and myoglobin (Mb) were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, while the visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and thigh circumference growth rate were recorded.

RESULTS

Average tourniquet duration significantly differed between the SHC (37.5 ± 5.1 min) and FC (66.4 ± 7.2 min) groups (p < 0.01); VAS and thigh circumference growth rate in the SHC group were much lower compared with the FC group, while ROM was higher within 48 h of tourniquet removal (p < 0.01). Blood TNF-α, PTX3, CCL2, PGE2, SOD-1, and Mb were lower in the SHC group than the FC group (p < 0.01). Additionally, intraoperative blood loss was significantly elevated in the SHC group than the FC group (p < 0.01), with lower postoperative blood loss in the drain (p = 0.001). Postoperative drainage volume was reduced in the SHC group compared with the FC group (p < 0.01); five and two patients in the FC and SHC groups required blood transfusion, respectively (p = 0.025). Hospital stay tended to be shorter in the SHC group (p = 0.023), and no tourniquet-related complications were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Improved therapeutic outcome was observed in the SHC group, indicating patients should routinely undergo TKA with SHC tourniquet application.

Does tourniquet use affect the periprosthetic bone cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A tourniquet is a device commonly used to control massive hemorrhage during knee replacement surgery. However, the question remains whether the use of tourniquets affects the permeability of the bone cement around the knee prosthesis. Moreover, the long-term effects and stability of the knee prosthesis are still debatable. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a tourniquet increases the thickness of the cement mantle and affects the postoperative blood loss and pain during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and Wang Fang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on primary TKA, from inception to November 2019. All RCTs in primary TKA with and without a tourniquet were included. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software.

RESULTS

A total of eight RCTs (677 knees) were analyzed. We found no significant difference in the age and sex of the patients. The results showed that the application of tourniquet affects the thickness of the bone cement around the tibial prosthesis (WMD = 0.16, 95%CI = 0.11 to 0.21, p < 0.00001). However, in our study, there was no significant difference in postoperative blood loss between the two groups was observed (WMD = 12.07, 95%CI = - 78.63 to 102.77, p = 0.79). The use of an intraoperative tourniquet can increase the intensity of postoperative pain (WMD = 1.34, 95%, CI = 0.32 to 2.36, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Tourniquet application increases the thickness of the bone cement around the prosthesis and may thus increase the stability and durability of the prosthesis after TKA. The application of an intraoperative tourniquet can increase the intensity of postoperative pain.

Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons prefer to perform total knee replacement surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is an occlusive device that restricts distal blood flow to help create a bloodless field during the procedure. A tourniquet may be associated with increased risk of pain and complications.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in knee replacement surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to 26 March 2020. We searched clinicaltrials.gov, the World Health Organization trials portal, and several international registries and joint registries up to March 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing knee replacement with use of a tourniquet versus without use of a tourniquet and non-randomised studies with more than 1000 participants. Major outcomes included pain, function, global assessment of success, health-related quality of life, serious adverse events (including venous thromboembolism, infection, re-operation, and mortality), cognitive function, and survival of the implant. Minor outcomes included blood loss, economic outcomes, implant stability, and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened abstracts and full texts, extracted data, performed risk of bias assessments, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 41 RCTs with 2819 participants. Trials included from 20 to 199 participants. Mean age ranged between 58 and 84 years. More than half of the RCTs had unclear risk of selection bias and unclear risk of performance and detection bias due to absence of blinding of participants and surgeons. Major outcomes Pain: at postoperative day 1, pain (on a scale from zero to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain) was ranked at 4.56 points after surgery without a tourniquet and at 1.25 points (MD) higher (95% CI 0.32 higher to 2.19 higher) with a tourniquet (8 studies; 577 participants), for an absolute difference of 12.5% higher pain scores (95% CI 3.2% higher to 21.9% higher) and a relative difference of 19% higher pain scores (95% CI 3.4% higher to 49% higher) with a tourniquet. Evidence for these findings was of moderate certainty, downgraded due to risk of bias. Knee replacement with a tourniquet probably led to higher postoperative pain scores at day 1, although this difference may or may not be noticeable to patients (based on a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.0). Function: at 12 months, tourniquet use probably makes little or no difference to function, based on an MCID of 5.3 for Knee Society Score (KSS) and 5.0 for Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Mean function (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes) was 90.03 points after surgery without a tourniquet and was 0.29 points worse (95% CI 1.06 worse to 0.48 better) on a 0 to 100 scale, absolute difference was 0.29% worse (1.06% worse to 0.48% better), with a tourniquet (5 studies; 611 participants). This evidence was downgraded to moderate certainty due to risk of bias. Global assessment of success: low-certainty evidence (downgraded due to bias and imprecision) indicates that tourniquet use may have little or no effect on success. At six months, 47 of 50 (or 940 per 1000) reported overall successful treatment after surgery without a tourniquet and 47 of 50 (or 940 per 1000) with a tourniquet (risk ratio (RR) 1.0, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.10) based on one study with 100 participants. Health-related quality of life: at six months, tourniquet may have little or no effect on quality of life. The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) score (mental component from zero to 100 (100 is best)) was 54.64 after surgery without a tourniquet and 1.53 (MD) better (95% CI 0.85 worse to 3.91 better) with a tourniquet (1 study; 199 participants); absolute difference was 1.53% better (0.85% worse to 3.91% better). Evidence was of low certainty, downgraded due to risk of bias and small number of participants. Serious adverse events: the risk of serious adverse events was probably higher with tourniquet; 26 of 898 (29 per 1000) reported events following surgery without a tourniquet compared to 53 of 901 (59 per 1000) with a tourniquet (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.73) in 21 studies (1799 participants). Twenty-nine more per 1000 patients (95% CI 3 to 50 more per 1000 patients) had a serious adverse event with a tourniquet. Forty-eight (95% CI 20 to 345) participants would need to have surgery without a tourniquet to avoid one serious adverse event. This evidence was downgraded to moderate certainty due to risk of bias. Cognitive function: one study reported cognitive function as an outcome; however the data were incompletely reported and could not be extracted for analysis. Survival of implant: it is uncertain if tourniquet has an effect on implant survival due to very low certainty evidence (downgraded for bias, and twice due to very low event rates); 2 of 107 (19 per 1000) required revision surgery in the surgery with a tourniquet group compared to 1 of 107 (9 per 1000) without a tourniquet group at up to two years' follow-up (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 8.92). This equates to a 0.4% (0.7% lower to 7% more) increased absolute risk in surgery with a tourniquet.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate certainty evidence shows that knee replacement surgery with a tourniquet is probably associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events. Surgery with a tourniquet is also probably associated with higher postoperative pain, although this difference may or may not be noticeable to patients. Surgery with a tourniquet does not appear to confer any clinically meaningful benefit on function, treatment success or quality of life. Further research is required to explore the effects of tourniquet use on cognitive function and implant survival, to identify any additional harms or benefits. If a tourniquet continues to be used in knee replacement surgery, patients should be informed about the potential increased risk of serious adverse events and postoperative pain.

Potential Risk Factors Contributing to Development of Venous Thromboembolism for Total Knee Replacements Patients Prophylaxed With Rivaroxaban: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Rivaroxaban after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is used to prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, despite thromboprophylaxis, some patients still develop postoperative VTE. To determine whether tourniquet time, time to initiate rivaroxaban (TTI_RIV), or Body Mass Index (BMI) was associated with postoperative VTE. A retrospective case-control study was conducted. Those patients that developed VTE despite prophylaxis (cases) were compared to controls (no VTE). A univariate analysis was conducted (p < 0.05 statistically significant). Seven VTE cases were identified from 234 TKA-patients. Patients with and without VTE had BMI of 40.1 ± 9.1 and 32.8 ± 7.5, respectively (p = 0.064). TTI_RIV in VTE and control group was 28.2 ± 4.7 hours and 26.4 ± 4.2 hours, respectively (p = 0.39). Mean tourniquet time in VTE and control group was 65.0 ± 8.7 minutes and 49 ± 8.8 minutes, respectively (p = 0.0007). Statistically significant differences in tourniquet times were noted between VTE and non-VTE group but not for TTI_RIV and BMI. Prolonged tourniquet use could pose a potential risk factor for postoperative VTE. Thromboprophylaxis management may need to be adjusted, based on patient-specific factors that could include increasing doses of oral anticoagulants and/or mechanical prophylaxis. However, further large-scale studies are required to establish pathophysiology.

Effects of tourniquet use in paediatric lower leg surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the tourniquet and its effect on post-operative pain in the paediatric population following lower leg procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective study of paediatric patients (under the age of 18) undergoing inpatient orthopaedic procedure below the knee performed at a single academic institution between 1st December 2013 and 31st January 2019 was conducted. Primary outcome measures of total opioid consumption during hospital stay and pre-operative nerve block utilization were retrieved from the electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary outcome measures of blood loss, tourniquet time, procedure time and length of hospital stay were also retrieved. Student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance between two sample means.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 204 paediatric procedures, 118 of which used a tourniquet and 86 of which did not. Paediatric patients with a tourniquet had significantly more opioid consumption post-operatively in the form of weight-based morphine equivalents/length of stay (p = 0.01) compared to those who had no tourniquet. This held true for males (p = 0.049) and females (p = 0.04) respectively. We did not see an increase in wound complications or return trips to the operating room in the tourniquet cohort. All procedures included an osseous component except one procedure in the non-tourniquet group.

CONCLUSION

Minimizing opioid consumption may be achieved by avoiding tourniquet use in paediatric patients with lower leg procedures. In non-anaemic paediatric patients, it is reasonably risk-free to perform these surgeries without the use of tourniquet to decrease opioid dependence in the post-operative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

More pain and slower functional recovery when a tourniquet is used during total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Although a tourniquet can effectively control intraoperative blood loss and offer clear surgical field in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its optimal usage has been controversial. The aim of this research was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare and explore the best application of a tourniquet in TKA.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the four different strategies of tourniquet application in TKA. In Group I, a tourniquet was not used and was called the non-tourniquet (NT) group. In Group II, a tourniquet was only used during the cementation of implants and was called the specific duration tourniquet (SDT) group. In Group III, the tourniquet was only released before wound closure to control the bleeding sources and was called the majority duration tourniquet (MDT) group. In Group IV, a tourniquet was used throughout the procedure, from skin incision to wound closure and was called the whole duration tourniquet (WDT) group.

RESULTS

Forty-six RCTs were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. In a comparison between the NT and WDT groups (25 RCTs), intraoperative blood loss (IBL) (P = 0.0001) and range of motion (ROM) (P = 0.0001) were significantly increased in the NT group, while the visual analog score (VAS) (P = 0.0001), rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (P = 0.01), and all complications (AC) (P = 0.0001) were significantly decreased in the NT group. In a comparison between the SDT and WDT groups (10 RCTs), IBL (P = 0.0001), TBL (P = 0.009), and ROM (P = 0.0001) were significantly increased in the SDT group, while thigh pain (P = 0.04) and the rate of DVT (P = 0.03) were significantly decreased in the SDT group. There were no significant differences between the MDT and WDT groups (12 RCTs) except for the rate of all complications (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite the decrease in IBL with a tourniquet, no difference was found in TBL. In conclusion, not using a tourniquet or only using it during the cementation of implants was preferable based on the faster functional recovery, lower rate of DVTs and complications compared with using a tourniquet throughout the TKA procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Influence of fast-track programs on patient-reported outcomes in total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR) at Swedish hospitals 2011-2015: an observational study including 51,169 THR and 8,393 TKR operations

Background and purpose - Fast-track care programs have been broadly introduced at Swedish hospitals in elective total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR). We studied the influence of fast-track programs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 1 year after surgery, by exploring outcome measures registered in the Swedish arthroplasty registers.Patients and methods - Data were obtained from the Swedish Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Registers and included TKR and THR operations 2011-2015 on patients with osteoarthritis. Based on questionnaires concerning the clinical pathway and care programs at Swedish hospitals, the patients were divided in 2 groups depending on whether they had been operated in a fast-track program or not. PROs of the fast-track group were compared with not fast-track using regression analysis. EQ-5D, EQ VAS, Pain VAS, and Satisfaction VAS were analyzed for both THR and TKR operations. The PROMs for TKR also included KOOS.Results - The differences of EQ-5D, EQ VAS, Pain VAS, and Satisfaction VAS 1 year after surgery were small but all in favor of fast-track for both THR and TKR, also in subscales of KOOS for TKR except KOOS QoL. However, the effect sizes as measured by Cohens' d formula were < 0.2 for all PROs, in both THR and TKR.Interpretation - Our results indicate that the fast-track programs may be at least as good as conventional care from the perspective of PROs 1-year postoperatively.

Tourniquet and tranexamic acid use in total knee arthroplasty

Background

There is no consensus on how tourniquet and tranexamic acid (TXA) use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affect blood transfusion rates and total blood loss. We compared outcome measures and transfusion rates after TKA, with and without the use of tourniquet and TXA.

Methods

A retrospective study of 477 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA between 2008 and 2013 was performed. There were 243 in the tourniquet-assisted (TA) and 234 in the tourniquet-unassisted (TU) group. Operative times, hemoglobin levels, blood transfusion rates, complications, and length of stay were assessed. Subanalysis was performed on those patients receiving and not receiving TXA within the TU group.

Results

Mean operative duration was 66.4 minutes in the TA group and 87.5 minutes in the TU group (P < .0001). Mean postoperative drop in hemoglobin was greater in TU group (3.1 g/dL vs 2.8 g/dL, P = .002). The transfusion rate was 9.5% in TA compared with 11.5% in TU patients (P = .46) with comparable mean units transfused (2.6 vs 2.2, P = .30). There was no difference in wound infection (P = .82) and total complication rates (P = .27) between groups. Those patients given TXA had a lower hemoglobin drop (2.6 g/dL vs 3.3 g/dL, P = .04) with similar transfusion (13.3% vs 11%, P = .61) and complication (P = .95) rates.

Conclusions

TU TKA had a greater operative duration and postoperative drop in hemoglobin than TA TKA. However, transfusion rates were similar between groups. TXA use reduced the operative decrease in hemoglobin with no effect on complication or transfusion rates.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Effects of Tourniquets in the Development of Pain States: a Novel Clinical Pilot Study and Review of Utilization of Tissue Oximetry to Measure Neural Ischemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately 20% of patients undergoing surgery develop persistent lower extremity pain following total knee arthroplasty. Animal studies have confirmed that prolonged tourniquet time increases the risk of endoneural ischemia and can mediate or modulate the development of chronic pain. The use of Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS) adjacent to nerve tissue, previously described as ONG has been shown to detect early neural compromise and has demonstrated clinical utility in carpal tunnel diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this pilot study, we recruited 10 healthy adult volunteers to undergo oxyneurography (ONG) and sensory nerve conduction testing (sNCT). We performed testing on the upper and lower extremities in each individual. The tourniquet was applied followed by measurements of sNCT and ONG as described. We observed a significant drop in the mean ONG index at 3 and 5 min following tourniquet inflation in upper and lower extremities. Similar to raw ONG values, there was significant variability in sNCT measurements, which in general increased from baseline with tourniquet inflation. In the upper extremity, there was a significant increase in sNCT with tourniquet inflation, while in the lower extremity, there was a trend towards significance. The use of ONG can be supported as a diagnostic tool to detect nerve ischemia and to potentially reduce the incidence of tourniquet-mediated or -modulated neural ischemia and reduce the development of chronic post-tourniquet pain.