Effect of rotational alignment on outcome of total knee arthroplasty

Midterm results for revision total knee arthroplasty for component malrotation

INTRODUCTION

Accurate positioning of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to a satisfactory outcome. Significant malrotation may lead to chronic pain, stiffness, and dysfunction. This study aims to quantify improvements in functional outcomes following revision surgery for malrotation of either one or both components in TKA versus revision for aseptic loosening.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of TKAs that matched and compared the two-year functional outcomes of the malrotation group to a functionally similar aseptic loosening group. Functional outcomes were compared between groups using Short Form (SF-12), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS). Student t-tests and chi-squared or Fisher's tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the patients revised, 24 had malrotation and 57 had aseptic loosening. A total of 16 femoral and 17 tibial components were revised for malrotation. All 16 femoral components were internally malrotated (mean -4.8 ± 4.1 degrees; range, -0.5 to -16.6). Of the tibial components, 15 were internally malrotated, (mean -9.5 ± 6.6 degrees; range, -2.2 to -23.5) and 2 were externally malrotated (mean 4.6 ± 2.1 degrees; range, 3.1 to 6.0). All functional outcome measures significantly improved comparably within both groups preoperatively to 24 months postoperatively. At 24 months, functional outcome measures were comparable between the groups and WOMAC function scores were significantly higher in the malrotation group.

CONCLUSION

Revision TKA for malrotation can yield clinically and statistically significant functional improvements, similar in magnitude to those seen following revision TKA for aseptic loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Component rotational mismatch in the standing position is a potential risk factor for unfavourable functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study assessed rotational mismatch between components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the supine and standing positions and aimed to investigate the effect of rotational mismatch in the standing position on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

Seventy-one patients (71 knees) who underwent TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis were used to investigate rotational mismatches between components. Rotational mismatches between components were examined on postoperative standing whole-leg and supine knee radiographs using a three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional model image registration technique, and the angles between the reference axes of the components were measured. Component alignment was evaluated using postoperative computed tomography images, and a questionnaire (2011 version of the Knee Society Score: [KSS 2011]) was mailed to investigate postoperative PROMs.

Results

In the entire cohort, rotational mismatches in the supine and standing positions were similar (p = 0.9315). In 15% of patients, the mismatch was large (>5°) in the supine position but small (<5°) in the standing position (overestimated group). However, in 23% of patients, the mismatch was small (<5°) in the supine position and large (>5°) in the standing position (underestimated group). The underestimated group had severe preoperative varus deformity, resulting in external rotation of both femoral and tibial components. Rotational mismatch in the standing position (p = 0.0032) was a significant risk factor for unfavourable PROMs. Patients with a mismatch in the standing position had significantly lower scores than those without a mismatch (p = 0.0215), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference values.

Conclusions

The underestimated group is clinically important because the surgical procedure and intraoperative assessment of component placement are performed in the supine position. In cases of severe preoperative varus deformity, care should be taken not to place the component in malrotation to avoid rotational mismatch in the standing position.

Level of Evidence

Ⅳ, Case series.

Precise Calibration of Femoral Component Rotation Using the Posterior Condylar Axis as a Reference during Image-free Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Technical Note

Introduction

The use of image-free robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is gaining popularity. Although the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is considered the optimal femoral rotational reference during TKA, it is difficult to define intra-operatively. Conventional and image-free robot-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) therefore rely on the use of Whiteside's axis (WSA) or the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as surrogate references. The PCA is considered to be associated with less variability than the WSA. The authors present a simple technique to permit calibration of femoral component rotation (FCR) using the PCA as a reference for image-free robotic systems that do not permit this option.

Technique

The image-free robotic systems used by the authors (Navio and CORI, Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) permit calibration of FCR only when the perpendicular to WSA is used as a reference. When the PCA is selected as a reference, a fixed 3° of external rotation is set by the robot. The technique proposed by the authors involves the use of the former setting, followed by internal rotation of the perpendicular to the WSA to co-align it with the PCA. The planning menu subsequently permits virtual surgical planning using the PCA as the femoral rotational reference and permits adjustments in rotational positioning of the femoral component while displaying the effect of rotation on bony resection and vice versa in real time. In addition, coaligning the perpendicular to the anatomic trans-epicondylar axis (aTEA) displays the internal rotation of the PCA with respect to the aTEA. This information can be used for setting rotational boundaries with respect to the PCA while using various alternate alignment strategies, like functional alignment, since the relation between the aTEA and sTEA is less likely to be affected by dyplasia and wear when compared with the PCA or WSA.

Conclusion

This simple technique permits optimally calibrated rotational positioning of the femoral component during image-free RA-TKA, using the PCA as a reference. It can be applied for optimizing surgery in knees with altered or outlier anatomy, as well as routinely, especially when alternate alignment strategies are used.

Cementless metal-backed patellar components in primary total knee arthroplasty using an implant of modern design

Aims

The use of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components has increased during the past decade. The initial design of cementless metal-backed patellar components had shown high failure rates due to many factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of a second-generation cementless, metal-backed patellar component of a modern design.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 707 primary TKAs in 590 patients from a single institution, using a cementless, metal-backed patellar component with a mean follow-up of 6.9 years (2 to 12). A total of 409 TKAs were performed in 338 females and 298 TKAs in 252 males. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (34 to 87) and their mean BMI was 34.3 kg/m2 (18.8 to 64.5). The patients were chosen to undergo a cementless procedure based on age and preoperative radiological and intraoperative bone quality. Outcome was assessed using the Knee Society knee and function scores and range of motion (ROM), complications, and revisions.

Results

A total of 24 TKAs (3.4%) in 24 patients failed and required revision surgery, of which five were due to patellar complications (0.71%): one for aseptic patellar loosening (0.14%) and four for polyethylene dissociation (0.57%). A total of 19 revisions (2.7%) were undertaken in 19 patients for indications which did not relate to the patella: four for aseptic tibial loosening (0.57%), one for aseptic femoral loosening (0.14%), nine for periprosthetic infection (1.3%), one for popliteus impingement (0.14%), and four for instability (0.57%). Knee Society knee and function scores, and ROM, improved significantly when comparing pre- and postoperative values. Survival of the metal-backed patellar component for all-cause failure was 97.5% (95% confidence interval 94.9% to 100%) at 12 years.

Conclusion

The second-generation cementless TKA design of metal-backed patellar components showed a 97.5% survival at 12 years, with polyethylene dissociation from the metal-backing being the most common cause of patellar failure. In view of the increased use of TKA, especially in younger, more active, or obese patients, these findings are encouraging at mean follow-up of seven years.

Factors that impact the patellofemoral contact stress in the TKA: a review

Abnormal retro patellar stress is believed to contribute to patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but the causal link between TKA and patellofemoral contact stress remains unclear. By reviewing the relevant studies, we found that both TKA implantation and additional patellar resurfacing increase retro patellar pressure. The rotation and size of the femoral component, thickness and position of the patellar component, installation of the tibial component, prosthesis design and soft tissue balance further influence patellofemoral stress. Specific measures can be applied to reduce stress, including the installation of the femoral prosthesis with an appropriate external rotation angle, placing the tibial component at a more posterior position and the patellar button at a more medial position, avoiding over-sized femoral and patellar components, selecting posterior-stabilized design rather than cruciate-retaining design, using gender-specific prosthesis or mobile-bearing TKA system, and releasing the lateral retinaculum or performing partial lateral facetectomy. Despite these measures, the principle of individualization should be followed to optimize the patellofemoral biomechanics.

Combined femoral and tibial component total knee arthroplasty device rotation measurement is reliable and predicts clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The optimal total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rotational alignment and how best to obtain and measure it are debatable. The aim was to analyse the reliability of the Berger femoral, three different tibial and four different combined two-dimensional computer tomography (2D-CT) TKA component rotation measurements, and to ascertain which rotational values best predict a successful clinical outcome.

METHODS

The 2D-CT scans were obtained post-operatively on 60 patients who had TKA. We determined one femoral [Berger's femoral angle (BFA)], three tibial [Berger's tibial angle (BTA), anatomical tibial angle (ATA) and bimalleolar posterior tibial component angle (BM_PTCA)] and four combined [transepicondylar posterior tibial component angle (TE_PTCA), bicondylar posterior tibial component angle (BC_PTCA, transepicondylar bimalleolar angle (TE_BM) and bicondylar bimalleolar angle (BC_BM)] TKA rotation angles. We made all measures in 23 patients twice by three observers and determined inter- and intra-observer agreement using the Bland-Altman plot method. We analysed measures of 55 patients using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis to ascertain the discriminative capacity of BFA, ATA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA for predicting a successful clinical outcome according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) threshold.

RESULTS

ATA showed the smaller inter- and intra-observer average of differences (-0.1° and 1.6°, respectively) of the studied methods followed by BFA (-0.9° and 1.4°), TE_PTCA (-2.1° and 2.7°) and BC_PTCA (-0.5° and 1.8°). BFA (-4° to 2.1° and -6.1° to 8.8°) and BC_PTCA (-4.4° to 3.4° and -7.9° to 4.4°) showed the narrower inter- and intra-observer limits of agreement. A TKA device rotation (BC_PTCA) < 0.8° of external rotation (ER) predicted a KSS and KSS knee successful outcome, and < 3.8° ER for KSS functional (AUC = 0.889; 0.907 and 0.764, respectively). BFA and ATA < 0.9° ER and < 3.9° internal rotation (IR) predicted a successful KSS knee outcome (AUC = 0.796 and 0.889, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ATA tibial component rotation measurement was the most reliable of those studied. BFA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA were reliable measures for TKA femoral and combined rotation. The presence of a minimal rotation between the TKA components (BC_PTCA) and a small femoral ER or tibial IR predicted a successful KSS outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Cementless Metal-Backed Patellar Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Average 10-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Historically, 1st generation metal-backed cementless patellar implants demonstrated high failure rates due to multiple factors. The 2nd generation cementless implants were developed with purported improvements in component design and polyethylene wear characteristics. This study evaluated clinical results of a current generation cementless metal-backed patellar implant with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-six primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with metal-backed cementless patellae were compared to 183 cemented patellae with the same implant design. The cementless group mean age was 61 years (range, 40 to 81), mean body mass index (BMI) of 34.9 (range, 22.6 to 64.5), and mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 5 to 13). The cemented group mean age was 65 years (range, 32 to 89), mean BMI of 32.5 (range, 18.2 to 56.6), and mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 5 to 12). Significant demographic differences of age (P < .001), BMI (P < .01), and sex (P < .001) were found, with cementless patients being younger, heavier, and with more men.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in non-revision procedures (P = .214), TKA revisions (P = .639), patellar revisions (P = .151), and patellar aseptic loosening (P = .737). The 10-year survivorship of the cementless metal-backed patella was 95.9% with all-cause failure as the endpoint. The 10-year survivorship of the cemented patellar component was 98.9%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated noninferiority of a 2nd generation HA-coated cementless metal-backed patellar implant in primary TKA compared to cemented patellae with 10-year survivorship of 95.9%. Advances in implant design and polyethylene wear properties have led to improved clinical results with metal-backed patellar components in primary TKA.

Comparison of Femoral Component Rotation between Robotic-Assisted vs. Soft-Tissue Tensor Total Knee Arthroplasty with Anatomic Implants

Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most effective treatment method for end-stage osteoarthritis. One of the most important aspects of this surgery is adequate implant positioning, as it guarantees the desired outcome of restoring limb biomechanics. Surgical technique is being continuously improved along with hardware development. There are two novel devices designed to help establish proper femoral component rotation: soft-tissue tensor and robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA). This study compared the femoral component rotation achieved with the use of three methods: RATKA, soft tissue tensioner and the conventional measured-resection technique, all of them utilizing anatomical design prosthesis components. Materials and Methods: A total of 139 patients diagnosed with end-stage osteoarthritis underwent total knee arthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021. After the surgery, they were divided into three groups depending on procedure technique and implant type: Persona (Zimmer Biomet) + Fuzion Balancer, RATKA + Journey II BCS or conventional TKA + Persona/Journey. Postoperatively, a computed tomography examination was performed in order to measure femoral component rotation. All three groups were compared independently during statistical analysis. Fisher's exact, Kruskal-Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Crichtlow-Fligner tests were used for particular calculations. Results: Statistically significant differences in femoral component rotation between groups were noticed. However, in terms of values other than 0° in external rotation, no significant variance was revealed. Conclusions: Additional total knee arthroplasty instruments seem to improve the outcomes of the surgery, providing better component positioning than in the conventional measured-resection technique based only on bone landmarks.

Postoperative femoral component rotation using posterior condylar referencing is difficult to predict preoperatively in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Many modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems use posterior condylar axis (PCA) to derive the surgical trans-epicondylar axis (sTEA), which is widely regarded as the gold standard for femoral component rotation. However, the previous imaging studies showed that cartilage remnants can alter component rotation. We therefore conducted this study to determine how the postoperative femoral component rotation deviated from the preoperative plan using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) which does not consider cartilage thickness.

METHODS

A total of 123 knees of 97 consecutive osteoarthritis patients who underwent the same primary TKA system using PCA reference guide were included. External rotation was set at 3°or 5° according to the preoperative 3D CT plan. The number of varus knees (hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle >5° varus) and valgus knees (HKA >5° valgus) were 100 and 5, respectively. The deviation from the preoperative plan was measured using overlapping pre- and postoperative 3D CT images.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation, range) deviation from the preoperative plan in varus group, external rotation setting of 3°, 5° in varus group and valgus group were 1.3° (1.9°, -2.6° - 7.3°), 1.0° (1.6°, -2.5° - 4.8°), 3.3° (2.3°, -1.2° - 7.3°), and -0.8° (0.8°, -2.0°-0.0°), respectively. No correlation was found between the deviation from the plan and the preoperative HKA angle in varus group (R = 0.15, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of asymmetric cartilage wear for rotation in the present study was supposed to be approximately 1° as mean value, but it can vary widely from patient to patient.

Comparison of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Component alignment is a crucial factor affecting the clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) systems were developed to improve the accuracy of alignment during surgery. This study aimed to compare differences in component alignment, clinical outcomes, and surgical duration when using conventional instrumentation (CONI), ABN, and computer navigation (CN) systems.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was carried out using the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. Articles that met the eligibility criteria were included in the study. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager based on Cochrane Review Method. The variables used for the analyses were postoperative clinical outcome (PCO), surgical duration, and component alignment, including the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, coronal femoral angle (CFA), coronal tibial angle (CTA), sagittal femoral angle (SFA), sagittal tibial angle (STA), and the outliers for the mentioned angles. The mean difference (MD) was calculated to determine the difference between the surgical techniques for continuous variables and the odds ratio (OR) was used for the dichotomous outcomes.

Results

The meta-analysis of the CONI and ABN system included 18 studies involving 2,070 TKA procedures, while the comparison of the ABN and CN systems included 5 studies involving 478 TKA procedures. The results showed that the ABN system provided more accurate component alignment for HKA, CFA, CTA, and SFA and produced fewer outliers for HKA, CFA, CTA, and STA. However, while the ABN system also required a significantly longer surgical time than the CONI approach, there was no statistical difference in PCO for the two systems. For the ABN and CN systems, there was no statistical difference in all variables except for the ABN system having a significantly shorter surgical duration.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the accuracy of component alignment between the ABN and CN systems, but the ABN approach had a shorter surgical duration and at lower cost. The ABN system also significantly improved the accuracy of component alignment when compared to the CONI approach, although the surgery was longer. However, there was no significant difference in PCO between the CONI, ABN, and CN systems.

Reference Axes for Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 1,351 Tibiae

BACKGROUND

Many anatomic landmarks have been described for setting tibial component rotation intraoperatively. There is no consensus as to which axis is best for reducing outliers and preventing malrotation.

METHODS

The SOMA (Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics) database (Stryker) was used to identify 1,351 computed tomography (CT) scans of the entire tibia. Several reference axes for the tibia (including the Mayo axis, Akagi line, Insall line, anterior condylar axis [ACA], posterior condylar axis [PCA], lateral tibial cortex [LTC], Cobb axis, tibial crest line [TCL], and transmalleolar axis [TMA]) were constructed according to published guidelines. The Berger method served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The Mayo method (involving a line connecting the medial and middle one-thirds of the tibial tubercle and the geometric center of the tibia) and the Insall line (involving a line connecting the posterior cruciate ligament [PCL] insertion and the intersection of the middle and medial one-thirds of the tibial tubercle) both had low variability relative to the Berger method (7.8° ± 1.0° and 5.1° ± 2.2°, respectively) and a low likelihood of internal rotation errors (0.7% and 1.8%, respectively). No clinically significant gender-based differences were found (<0.7° for all). The same was true for ethnicity, with the exception of consistently greater tibial intorsion in Asian versus Caucasian individuals (mean difference in TCL position, +4.5° intorsion for Asian individuals; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This CT-based study of 1,351 tibiae (which we believe to be the largest study of its kind) showed that the Mayo and Insall methods (both of which reference the medial and middle one-thirds of the tibial tubercle) offer an ideal balance of accuracy, low variability, and a reduced likelihood of internal rotation errors. Setting rotation on the basis of distal landmarks (tibial shaft and beyond) may predispose surgeons to substantial malrotation errors, especially given the differences in tibial torsion found between ethnic groups in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison with Navigation of a Novel Three-Step Technique for Improving Accuracy of the Distal Femoral Resection during Conventional TKA: A Case-Control Study

Correct placement of the femoral component in the coronal plane during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is related to long-term survival. The aim of this radiographic study was to determine the accuracy of a novel three-step technique for improving the accuracy of the distal femoral cut during conventional technique and compare it with computer navigation during TKA. A total of 458 TKAs were retrospectively analyzed (178 conventional TKAs with the novel technique and 280 navigated TKAs) for postoperative femoral component coronal alignment and compared between the two groups. Mean femoral component coronal alignment was not significantly different (p = 0.314) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the mean femoral component coronal alignment between varus and valgus knees. The number of outliers (90 ± 3 degrees) for femoral component coronal alignment was not significantly different between the two groups when assessed separately for varus and valgus deformities. The mean value of femoral component alignment using the conventional technique in knees with varus deformity <10 degrees was 88.8 degrees, in knees with varus deformity 10 to 20 degrees was 89.4 degrees, and in those with varus deformity >20 degrees was 90.2 degrees. Femoral component alignment in knees with varus <10 degrees was significantly different from those >20 degrees (p = 0.006); there was no significant difference between knees with varus <10 degrees and those with 10 to 20 degrees varus (p = 0.251), nor between 10 and 20 degrees varus knees and those with varus >20 degrees (p = 0.116). Using the novel three-step technique during conventional TKA to perform the distal femoral cut can help achieve femoral component coronal alignment comparable to the navigation technique.

Correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

50 TKA patients from a regional hospital were enrolled in the study. The following component alignments were measured from radiological data acquired within 1 week after surgery: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial distal femoral angle (MDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral flexion-extension angle (FEA), tibial slope angle (TSA), femoral rotational angle (FRA) and tibial rotational angle (TRA). The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system was used to assess clinical outcomes after 1 year, with patients being divided into three groups (excellent, good and not good) according to the HSS scores. Difference analysis and linear correlation analysis were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed significant differences in MDFA (p = 0.050) and FEA (p = 0.001) among the three patient groups. It was also found that the total HSS had only a moderate correlation with FEA (r = 0.572, p < 0.001), but FEA had a positive linear correlation with pain scores (r = 0.347, p = 0.013), function scores (r = 0.535, p = 0.000), ROM scores (r = 0.368, p = 0.009), muscle scores (r = 0.354, p = 0.012) and stability scores (r = 0.312, p = 0.028). A larger MDFA was associated with lower FE deformity scores (r = -0.289, p = 0.042) and the TSA had a positive influence on the ROM (r = 0.436, p = 0.002). Also, changes in FRA produced a consequent change in the FE deformity score (r = 0.312, p = 0.027), and the muscle strength scores increased as TRA increased (r = 0.402, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The results show that the FEA plays a significant role in clinical outcomes after TKA. Surgical techniques and tools may need to be improved to accurately adjust the FEA to improve joint functionality and patient satisfaction.

Failure modes in malrotated total knee replacement

PURPOSE

Achieving normal rotational alignment of both components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for improved knee survivorship and function. However, malrotation is a known complication resulting in higher revision rates. Understanding malrotation of the components and its concomitant clinical and functional outcomes are important for early diagnosis and management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of malrotation on clinical outcomes and failure modes in both single and combined rotational malalignment.

METHODS

From our hospital database of 364 revisions, a cohort of 76 knees with patellar maltracking, stiffness, reduced range of motion and early aseptic failure were reviewed and investigated for component malrotation using computed tomography following Berger protocol. CT findings confirmed component malrotation in 70 of these patients. Investigations included (1) measurement of femoral component malrotation using surgical transepicondylar axis, (2) measurement of tibial component malrotation using anteroposterior axis and (3) measurement of combined component rotational errors.

RESULTS

The correlation of CT analysis and clinical outcomes after primary TKA revealed association of patellar maltracking with femoral internal rotation, pain and instability with tibial internal rotation and knee stiffness in patients with combined component malrotation as the commonest mode of presentation. Our study showed that patients with isolated femoral, tibial and combined malrotation presented at a mean period of 3.4 ± 1.34, 1.7 ± 0.8 and 2.3 ± 0.69 years, respectively, after the index surgery. Post-revision, the mean Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score improved from 29.1 to 78.7, and 10.5 to 32.8, respectively, and the mean range of motion improved from 74.9 ± 24.8 to 97.1 ± 12.7 degrees at a mean follow-up of 42 months.

CONCLUSION

Early detection of malrotation in TKA and its management with revision of both components can lead to better clinical and functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS) or robot-assisted surgery (RAS) enable more accurate rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to conventional instrumentation, in terms of deviation from the planned target and the proportion of outliers from the target zone.

METHODS

The authors independently conducted three structured electronic literature searches using the PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 2007 to 2020. Studies were included if they compared rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate during TKA using conventional instrumentation versus PSI, CAS, and/or RAS, and reported deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in terms of absolute angles and/or number of outliers. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two researchers according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, that reported on 2925 knees, were eligible for this systematic review, of which 6 studies used PSI, and 9 used CAS. No studies were found for RAS. Of the studies that reported on angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment, most found smaller deviations using PSI (0.5° to 1.4°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.0° to 1.6°). All studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), found lower rates of outliers using PSI (0 to 22%) compared to conventional instrumentation (5 to 96%). Most studies reported smaller angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment using CAS (0.1° to 6.9°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.1° to 7.8°). Of the studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), most found fewer outliers using CAS (10 to 61%) compared to conventional instrumentation (17 to 78%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that both CAS and PSI can improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate by decreasing angular deviation from the preoperatively planned target and reducing the proportion of outliers from the target zone. The clinical relevance is that PSI and CAS can improve alignment, though the thresholds necessary to grant better outcomes and survival remain unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Metal Artifact Reduction Dual-Energy CT as an Accurate and Reliable Method for Measuring Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component Rotation Compared to Conventional CT

This article determines the accuracy and reliability of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) with metal artifact reduction (MAR) in the evaluation of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), in comparison with conventional CT images. A total of 49 patients (mean age, 69 years; 42 women) who underwent TKA between January 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Femoral component rotation, including the anatomic and surgical transepicondylar axes, was evaluated with preoperative conventional CT and postoperative conventional CT and DECT with MAR. Surgical femoral component rotation was also assessed as a reference standard. Accuracy was assessed using paired t-test, and inter- and intraobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on postoperative conventional CT and DECT with MAR. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society objective and functional scores. Accuracy of femoral component rotation was not significantly different from that of surgical rotation with both conventional CT and DECT with MAR. However, inter- and intraobserver reliability were better for DECT with MAR (ICC: 0.953-0.966) than for conventional CT (ICC: 0.641-0.749). The Knee Society objective and functional scores improved 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION:  DECT with MAR showed accurate and more reliable results than did conventional CT in the evaluation of femoral component rotation after TKA.

Soft-tissue landmarks for tibial baseplate rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study

The tip of the tibial tubercle (TTT) is used to assess tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, it can be difficult to palpate and visualize intraoperatively. Several more easily accessible soft-tissue structures have been proposed as intraoperative assessments, including the patellar tendon's medial border (MBPT) and the junction of the medial third of the patellar tendon (mt-PT). No studies have described the relationship between the TTT and these proposed landmarks. The aims of the study were to (1) determine the relationship of the soft-tissue landmarks to the TTT and (2) identify any sex differences in these measures. Measurements of the position of these soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT were made on 56 cadaveric knees (28 female) by two observers at the level of the standard tibial cut (10 mm distal to the lateral tibial plateau). The results obtained were compared by sex and side. On average, 50.7% (SD 6.79, range 33.1%-63.1%) of the patellar tendon footprint was medial to the TTT. There were no significant differences between the sexes or left and right lower limbs. However, there was large variability in the position of all the soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT. The results indicate that, on average, the patellar tendon footprint is evenly spread around the TTT. However, there is a large variability in the anatomical relationship between the soft-tissue landmarks and the TTT. Caution is advised if relying on these structures intraoperatively.

Patient perspectives of pain and function after knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

Introduction

Joint replacement surgery typically results in good clinical outcome, although some people experience suboptimal pain relief and functional improvement. Predicting surgical outcome is difficult.

Objectives

There is merit in better understanding patients' perspectives of pain and function to identify avoidable problems perceived to contribute to their outcome, to inform prognostic expectations, and to identify potential cointerventions to sit alongside surgery that might mitigate pain/functional problems. Here, we aimed to synthesise the available literature exploring perspectives of people with knee osteoarthritis about their pain and function following joint replacement.

Methods

Six electronic databases and 2 websites were searched. Two independent reviewers completed study inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction. Data were iteratively synthesised using first-, second-, and third-order analyses.

Results

Twenty-eight studies were included. Four themes were identified; perceptions of pain and function were inseparable. Theme 1 addressed experiences of recovery after surgery, which often differed from expectations. Theme 2 described the challenges of the pain experience and its functional impact, including the difficulty navigating medication use in context of personal beliefs and perceived stigma. Theme 3 articulated the toll of ongoing problems spanning pain-function-mood, necessitating the need to "endure." Theme 4 encompassed the importance of clinical/social interactions on mood and pain, with reports of concerns dismissed and practical support missing.

Conclusions

Together, these findings show that numerous individual considerations beyond the technical aspects of surgery influence experiences of pain and function. A tailored approach addressing these considerations from the patient perspective could provide a basis for improved success of knee replacement surgery.

Femoral matched tibia component rotation has little effect on the tibial torsion after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Tibiofemoral synchronization technique matches the rotational alignment of the tibial component to the femoral component during the total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The rotational axis of the proximal tibia can be changed by this technique, which affects tibial torsion postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tibiofemoral synchronization technique affect the tibial torsion, and the lower limb rotation after primary TKA. It was hypothesised that the tibial torsion would change after primary TKA.

METHODS

Ninety-three posterior stabilised TKAs from 89 patients were included from January 2017 to December 2018. Mechanical hip-knee-ankle axis (mHKA), in plain radiographs, femoral anteversion, tibial torsion, femoral neck-malleolar angle (FNMA), and rotational alignment of the femoral and the tibial components in pre- and postoperative CT scans were measured by two blinded observers. The primary outcome was a postoperative change in femoral anteversion, tibial torsion and FNMA. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Knee Society Knee Score (AKSKS)/Function Score (AKSFS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) preoperatively and at 1 year after TKA. Patients' perception of changes in the foot progression angle after TKA was investigated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean rotational mismatch between the femoral and the tibial component was 0.6 ± 3.2°. There was a significant decrease in femoral anteversion (9.5 ± 6.7° vs. 5.2 ± 6.6°, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in the FNMA (17.6 ± 9.7° vs. 21.8 ± 10.5°, p = 0.005) after TKA, while no significant change in tibia torsion was observed (25.4 ± 8.8° vs. 24.9 ± 9.3°, p = 0.739). AKSS (37.8 ± 15.1 vs. 92.8 ± 8.8, p < 0.001), AKSFS (53.9 ± 18.1 vs. 89.9 ± 5.3, p < 0.001), and OKS (18.0 ± 7.3 vs. 39.9 ± 4.8, p < 0.001) were significantly improved at 1 year after TKA. Ten knees (11%) had changes in tibial torsion greater than ± 10° postoperatively. Four of five patients who had changes in FNMA greater than 15° perceived the external rotation of the foot progression angle after TKA. All four patients had an increase in tibial torsion larger than 10°.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the tibiofemoral synchronization technique less likely affects the tibial torsion after primary TKA.

Hinge fracture in lateral closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy in knees undergoing double-level osteotomy: assessment of postoperative change in rotational alignment using CT evaluation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the radiological features of hinge fracture occurring at the distal medial femoral cortex in knees undergoing biplanar lateral closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCW-DFO) in double-level osteotomy (DLO) based on pre- and postoperative CT image analyses. It was hypothesised that medial hinge fractures in LCW-DFO would occur with a similar incidence to that in high tibial osteotomy, and its occurrence would affect the clinical/radiological outcomes and induce unintended change in alignment depending on the fracture type (direction of the fracture).

METHODS

A consecutive series of 36 knees (31 patients) with primary varus osteoarthritis undergoing DLO comprised the study population. The mean age at surgery was 62.0 ± 5.9 years. Presence of hinge fracture was assessed on radiographs and CT images at 1 week. The fracture type was classified depending on the direction of the fracture line: crack propagation in line with the osteotomy (type 1) and fractures extending proximally (type 2) or distally (type 3) from the tip of the wedge. Computer-assisted assessments of bony limb alignment and bony geometry were conducted on a full-length weight-bearing radiograph and CT images using image analysis software. In addition, subjective clinical results were evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Radiological and clinical follow-up results at 1 and 2 years were compared to the preoperative data, while comparative analysis was made between the subjects with and without a hinge fracture.

RESULTS

Postoperative image examinations revealed type 1 and 2 medial femoral hinge fractures in 4 and 7 knees, while no type 3 fracture was identified in the study population. Consequently, the overall incidence of the hinge fracture was 30.6% (11 of the 36 knees). Four of those 11 fractures (36.4%) could not be detected on plain radiographs. CT image analysis for three-dimensional bony geometry showed greater increase in internal rotation of the distal bony segment (increased femoral antetorsion by 9.5° on average) after surgery compared to the knees without a hinge fracture (P = 0.01). Clinical evaluation using the KOOS at 2 years showed no significant difference between the groups with and without hinge fractures.

CONCLUSION

In LCW-DFO, medial femoral hinge fractures occurred in 30.6% of the cases. Knees with type 1 hinge fracture exhibited significantly greater increase in femoral antetorsion as compared to those without hinge fracture. In this case series, postoperative weight-bearing protocol was delayed for knees with hinge fracture. Consequently, surgical results were not affected by the occurrence of hinge fracture for up to 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (case series).

Clinical impact of component placement in manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review

AIMS

The goal of the current systematic review was to assess the impact of implant placement accuracy on outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases in order to assess the impact of the patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and implant placement accuracy on outcomes following TKA. Studies assessing the impact of implant alignment, rotation, size, overhang, or condylar offset were included. Study quality was assessed, evidence was graded (one-star: no evidence, two-star: limited evidence, three-star: moderate evidence, four-star: strong evidence), and recommendations were made based on the available evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies were identified for inclusion. With respect to PROMs, there was two-star evidence in support of mechanical axis alignment (MAA), femorotibial angle (FTA), femoral coronal angle (FCA), tibial coronal angle (TCA), femoral sagittal angle (FSA), femoral rotation, tibial and combined rotation/mismatch, and implant size/overhang or offset on PROMs, and one-star evidence in support of tibial sagittal angle (TSA), impacting PROMs. With respect to survival, there was three- to four-star evidence in support FTA, FCA, TCA, and TSA, moderate evidence in support of femoral rotation, tibial and combined rotation/mismatch, and limited evidence in support of MAA, FSA, and implant size/overhang or offset impacting survival.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there is limited evidence to suggest that PROMs are impacted by the accuracy of implant placement, and malalignment does not appear to be a significant driver of the observed high rates of patient dissatisfaction following TKA. However, FTA, FCA, TCA, TSA, and implant rotation demonstrate a moderate-strong relationship with implant survival. Efforts should be made to improve the accuracy of these parameters in order to improve TKA survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1449-1456.

[Application and research progress of robotic-arm in total knee arthroplasty]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the application and research progress of robotic-arm in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Relevant literature at home and abroad was extensively reviewed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA).

RESULTS

Accurate reconstruction of lower extremity alignment and rotation alignment, accurate osteotomy and implant prosthesis in TKA are very important to improve the effectiveness and prolong the life of the prosthesis. Traditional TKA deviations occur in key links such as osteotomy due to operator's operation. RATKA solves the above problems to a certain extent and can assist accurate osteotomy and implant prosthesis, and protect the soft tissues around the knee joint. Patients' satisfaction after RATKA is high, and the operator's learning curve is shorter, which improves the efficiency of the operation. But it also has disadvantages such as prolonged operation time, increased complications and medical costs.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary clinical application studies have shown that RATKA has satisfactory effectiveness, but its definite advantages compared with traditional TKA need to be confirmed by a large number of randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up.

A Validated, Automated, 3-Dimensional Method to Reliably Measure Tibial Torsion

BACKGROUND

Tibial torsion is a twist in the tibia measured as an angle between a proximal axis line and a distal axis line. Abnormal torsion has been associated with a variety of painful clinical syndromes of the lower limb. Measurements of normal tibial torsion reported by different authors vary by 100% (ranging from 20° to 42°), making it impossible to determine normal and pathological levels.

PURPOSE

To address the problem of unreliable measurements, this study was conducted to define an automated, validated computer method to calculate tibial torsion. Reliability was compared with current clinical methods. The difference between measurements of torsion generated from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the same bone, and between males and females, was assessed.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Previous methods of analyzing tibial torsion were reviewed, and limitations were identified. An automated measurement method to address these limitations was defined. A total of 56 cadaveric and patient tibiae (mean ± SD age, 37 ± 15 years; range, 17-71 years; 28 female) underwent CT scanning, and 3 blinded assessors made torsion measurements by applying 2 current clinical methods and the automated method defined in the present article. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were calculated. Further, 12 cadaveric tibiae were scanned by MRI, stripped of tissue, and measured using a structured light (SL) scanner. Differences between torsion values obtained from CT, SL, and MRI scans, and between males and females, were compared using t tests. SPSS was used for all statistical analysis.

RESULTS

When the automated method was used, the tibiae had a mean external torsion of 29°± 11° (range, 9°-65). Automated torsion assessment had excellent reliability (ICC, 1), whereas current methods had good reliability (ICC, 0.78-0.81). No significant difference was found between the torsion values calculated from SL and CT (P = .802), SL and MRI (P = .708), or MRI and CT scans (P = .826).

CONCLUSION

The use of software to automatically perform measurements ensures consistency, time efficiency, validity, and accuracy not possible with manual measurements, which are dependent on assessor experience.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We recommend that this method be adopted in clinical practice to establish databases of normal and pathological tibial torsion reference values and ultimately guide management of related conditions.

Threshold values for stress radiographs in unstable knees after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the potential benefit of stress radiographs for diagnosis of unstable total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to identify clinically relevant cut-off values to differentiate between unstable and stable TKAs.

METHODS

Data of 40 patients with 49 cruciate retaining (CR) TKA who underwent stress radiographs as part of the diagnostic algorithm in a painful knee clinic were prospectively collected. Anterior and posterior stress radiographs were done in 90° and 15° flexion, varus-valgus stress radiographs in 0° and 30° knee flexion. Knee laxity was measured in mm and degrees by two independent observers using standardized landmarks. Intra- and inter-observer single measure intraclass correlations were between 0.92 to 1 and 0.89 to 1, respectively. For evaluation and investigation of the potential cut-off values, two groups of patients with and without revision surgery due to instability were compared. Radiographic measures of standardized z values according to the group without revision due to instability were used to calculate average and maximum laxity z-scores.

RESULTS

Knees undergoing revision TKA due to instability showed significantly (p < 0.001) lower (KSS) pain/function scores (94 ± 6.3, range 80-100; control group: 112 ± 19.2, range 80-148) and total KSS scores when compared to the control group. The laxity values of patients with instability were significantly higher in terms of mean values (p < 0.01) when compared to the control group. The maximum laxity z-score showed the strongest difference between the groups (R² = 0.26, p < 0.001). The following cut-off values indicating need of revision due to instability were established: in 90° (15°) flexion-anterior translation 5.2 mm (22.4 mm), posterior translation 16.6 mm (13.2 mm); varus stress in 0° (20°-30°) flexion-inlay gap 5.2 mm (6.1 mm) or joint angle 6.1° (6.8°); valgus stress in 0° (20°-30°) flexion-inlay gap 4.6 mm (5.7 mm) or joint angle 5.2° (7.1°).

CONCLUSION

Standardized stress radiographs are helpful tools for diagnosis of instability after TKA. The established cut-off values help to guide decision making in this challenging group of patients. However, laxity values should not be considered as the only criteria for diagnosis of unstable TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A comparison of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty in Kanekasu radiographs, axial CT slices and 3D reconstructed images

OBJECTIVE

To compare the posterior condylar angle measured with Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT with the gold standard 3D-CT following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Eighty-two knees with pain following TKA were included in this retrospective study. Two independent raters measured the anatomical and surgical posterior condylar angles twice on each Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT. These measurements were compared against the 3D-CT measurement. The intra- and interrater reliability of the Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT and the correlation with 3D-CT were calculated.

RESULTS

The intra- and interrater reliability for measurements of the anatomical posterior condyle angle for the Kanekasu radiograph and the 2D-CT were excellent for both raters (0.85-0.92). For the less experienced rater 1, the intrarater reliability was significantly better for 2D-CT than Kanekasu radiograph for measuring both the surgical (p < 0.01) and anatomical posterior condyle angles (p < 0.05). For the experienced rater 2, the intrarater reliability was significantly better for Kanekasu radiograph than 2D-CT for measurement of the surgical posterior condyle angle (p < 0.05). The correlation with 3D-CT is higher in 2D-CT than in Kanekasu radiograph (p < 0.01). While the Kanekasu radiograph predicts the 3D-CT angle with 65.9%, 2D-CT can measure the true angle with 82.9% certainty.

CONCLUSION

Measurements using the anatomical transepicondylar axis are easier to replicate compared to the surgical transepicondylar axis. In comparison with the gold standard 3D-CT, 2D-CT showed a significantly higher correlation with 3D-CT than the Kanekasu measurements. If 3D-CT is available, it should be preferred over 2D-CT and Kanekasu view radiograph for femoral component rotation measurements.

Evaluating distal femoral torsion and posterior condylar line reliability for adjusting femoral component rotation in TKA, Egyptian population radiographic study

BACKGROUND

Femoral component rotational alignment is critical for successful TKA. The primary study objective is to measure the preoperative distal femoral torsion (DFT) of an Egyptian patient's cohort using a seated posteroanterior (PA) knee radiograph. The secondary objectives are to check the intraoperative reliability of using the posterior condylar line (PCL) as a reference for rotation and to measure postoperative component rotation using the same radiographic technique.

METHODS

100 arthritic knees, 22 males, 78 females, 95 Varus and five valgus. A long anteroposterior radiograph [Hip to knee to ankle (HKA)] for coronal alignment assessment, and the anatomical posterior condylar angle (aPCA) between the anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA) and the PCL was measured in the seated PA knee radiographs for evaluating the DFT and component rotation. Intraoperative rotation was adjusted to 3° external rotation to the PCL.

RESULTS

HKA improved from a preoperative mean 170.4° ± 6.2 to a postoperative mean 178.3° ± 1.5 (p < 0.005). DFT was internal in all knees; the mean aPCA was -4.5 ± 2.4 (0° to -9°), femoral component rotation significantly changed to a mean aPCA of -3.6 ± 2.3 (0° to -7°) (p = 0.005). Acceptable intraoperative patellar tracking in 94%, and patellar subluxation needed a lateral retinacular release in 2% (two valgus knees). The preoperative DFT was not affected by sex or direction of coronal deformity; more external DFT noticed in severe varus deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

All keens had an internal DFT not affected by sex, or coronal deformity direction. Using PCL as a guide to adjust femoral component rotation is a valid technique in our population.

Malrotation of the fixed-bearing posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis causes a postoperative rotational mismatch between the femur and tibia

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors associated with rotational mismatch after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using fixed-bearing posterior stabilized prosthesis and to evaluate the impact of the rotational mismatch on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 159 cases that underwent TKA. Whole-leg computed tomography images were obtained 2 weeks after TKA, with three-dimensional measures of alignment. Rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components and rotational mismatch between components and between the femur and tibia bones were evaluated. The new Knee Society Score (KSS) was obtained at the final outpatient visit, which was defined as the final follow-up timepoint. Predictive factors were identified for rotational mismatch of the lower extremity and poor new KSS.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 42 ± 16 months. Rotational mismatch ≥ 10° between bones was identified in 56 cases (35%), with a mean mismatch angle of 5.0° ± 9.1° of external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. Rotational mismatch ≥ 10° between components was identified in three cases (2%; mean 0.3° ± 3.6° of internal tibial rotation). A multivariate regression analysis showed that component malrotation was predictive of post-operative rotational mismatch between bones (p < 0.01) and rotational mismatch ≥ 10° associated with poor new KSS (odds ratio 4.22; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Malrotation of the fixed-bearing posterior stabilized TKA causes a rotational mismatch between the femur and tibia bones. Excessive rotational mismatch between bones greater than 10° is a risk factor for poor postoperative functional outcome. Precise component positioning is essential for improving TKA outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Femoral component malrotation is not correlated with poor clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Proper rotational alignment of the femoral component is critical for a successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the available literature to examine the effect of the TKA femoral component malrotation on clinical outcomes and assess a cut-off value for femoral rotation leading to revision surgery.

METHODS

A detailed and systematic search from 1996 to 2019 of the PUBMED, Medline, Cochrane Reviews and Google Scholar databases had been performed using the keyword terms "total knee arthroplasty OR replacement" AND "femoral alignment OR malalignment OR femoral rotation OR malrotation" AND "clinical outcome". We used the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) to identify scientifically sound articles in a reproducible format.

RESULTS

Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 896 arthroplasties were included in this review; 409 were unexplained painful TKA patients, while 487 were painless TKA patients. The mean age of patients was 67.5 (± 2.1) years. The mean post-operative follow-up delay was 46.8 (± 32.2) months. The mean of MINORS score was 21 points indicating good methodological quality in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The present review confirms that the malrotation of the femoral component in TKA does not correlate automatically to poor clinical and functional outcome. The clinical relevance of this study was that, to improve accuracy in femoral component rotation, surgeons should consider the anatomical variability of femur in each knee and perform additional measurements pre- and intra-operatively. Taking a more accurate approach will shed light on unanswered questions in unhappy TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Fewer femoral rotational outliers produced with CT- than with MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Previous studies comparing the surgical accuracy between computed tomography (CT)- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) methods have produced contradictory results. The aim of this study was to determine which is the more reliable imaging method (CT versus MRI) for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA). CT-based PSI is hypothesised to have an advantage regarding the number of outliers.

METHODS

A total of 22 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including 1749 TKA cases, were eligible for the meta-analysis. RCTs, systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic published in databases before September 2018 were identified by a literature search. The primary outcome was the number of lower extremities with greater than 3° of difference in alignment angles between the postoperative outcomes and target outcomes. The parameters calculated from the meta-analysis included risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, the publication bias and heterogeneity of the studies were assessed.

RESULTS

The risk of femoral rotational outliers in the PSI group (RR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.98) was significantly reduced. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that the accuracy in the CT-based PSI group was significantly higher than that in the MRI-based CSI group (RR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.92).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that when performing TKA with PSI, preoperative CT is beneficial for the production of the PSI, resulting in a significantly lower proportion of outliers in femoral rotational alignment. CT should be the preferred choice for imaging when performing TKA surgery with PSI to obtain better femoral rotational alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study (systematic review and meta-analysis), Level I.

Sagittal alignment of the cemented femoral component in revision total knee arthroplasty influences the anterior and posterior condylar offset: Stem length does not affect these variables

BACKGROUND

The position of the femoral component can influence knee kinematics by altering the posterior (PCO) and anterior condylar offset (ACO). The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the length of the cemented stem influences the sagittal position of the femoral component after revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The secondary aim was to determine the influence of the sagittal position on PCO and ACO.

METHODS

There were 172 consecutive patients over a seven-year period that underwent rTKA with a cemented semi-constrained prosthesis. The 172 patients were separated into two groups: 115 with short stems (50 mm) and 57 with longer stems (100 or 150 mm). Using rotationally acceptable lateral radiographs, the degree of flexion(+)/extension(-) of the femoral components, PCO, and ACO were measured.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference (p > 0.25) between the two groups for sagittal position, PCO, or ACO. The average flexion of the femoral component with short stems was 2.2 ± 4.1° and 2.2 ± 3.4° for long stems (difference = 0.0, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.3 to 1.2). The average PCO ratio was 1.02 ± 0.15 for short stems and 0.99 ± 0.17 for long stems (difference = 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08). The average ACO ratio was at 0.07 ± 0.08 for short stems and 0.08 ± 0.08 for long stems (difference = 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.04). There was a significant correlation between sagittal alignment of the femoral component and PCO (flexion increased PCO, r = 0.39, p < 0.0001) and ACO (flexion decreased ACO, r = -0.34, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented stem length does not influence the position of femoral component in the sagittal axis, PCO, or ACO. Surgical technique and sizing of the femoral component may be more predictive.

Accuracy of a Novel 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Intramedullary Guide to Control Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most universal and effective means for treating terminal stage osteoarthritis (OA) of knee. Accurate intramedullary guide of femur is the basis for the distal femoral cuts. Determining the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is the key to reconstruction of the femoral rotational alignment, because the correct rotational alignment can place the femoral component in the right position, balance the flexion gap so that the inner and outer tension is equal, get stability during the flexion process of the knee, and enhance the quality of life of patients. With the development of three‐dimensional printing (3DP) technology in the medical domain, the application of patient‐specific instrumentation (PSI) in arthroplasty has become more common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel 3D‐printed patient‐specific intramedullary guide to control femoral component rotation in TKA.

Methods

Eighty patients (65 females and 15 males) with knee OA were included in this prospective randomized study. The patients were divided into two groups by random number table method, 40 in each group. TKA assisted by PSI (PSI group) and conventional TKA (conventional group) was performed respectively. Clinical outcomes [operation time, postoperative drainage volume, duration of drainage, Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS), American Knee Society knee score (AKS)] and radiological outcomes [hip‐knee‐ankle angle (HKA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), patella transverse axis‐femoral transepicondylar axis angle (PFA), depth of intramedullary guide] were compared between and within the two groups.

Results

PSI group had less postoperative drainage volume but longer operation time than the conventional group (P < 0.05). The AKS and HSS scores after surgery were improved compared with those before surgery in each group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of drainage and range of motion (ROM) after surgery between the two groups. For the radiological results, the HKA and PFA were improved after surgery in both groups (P < 0.05).The postoperative PFA and PCA of the PSI group were closer to 0°, which was better than that of the conventional group (P < 0.05). The depth of intramedullary guide in the PSI group was less than the conventional group (P < 0.05). But there was no significant difference in HKA before and after surgery between the two groups as well as the preoperative PFA.

Conclusion

The short‐term clinical efficacy of TKA assisted by PSI was similar to the conventional TKA. Although TKA assisted by PSI spent more time during operation, it could assist in intramedullary guide and align femoral rotation more accurately.

Accuracy of Reference Axes for Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 2,128 Femora

BACKGROUND

Many reference axes are used to evaluate rotation of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty, including the Whiteside line, surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA), posterior condylar axis externally rotated 3° (PCA+3°ER), sulcus line, and femoral transverse axis (FTA). There is no consensus about which of these axes is most accurate.

METHODS

The Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics (SOMA) database was used to identify 2,128 entire-femur computed tomography (CT) scans. The Whiteside line, aTEA, PCA+3°ER, sulcus line, and FTA were constructed according to published guidelines. Every axis was compared with the sTEA, which is widely regarded as the gold standard reference axis for rotation of the distal part of the femur but has low intraobserver and interobserver reliability intraoperatively.

RESULTS

The PCA+3°ER differed from the sTEA by a mean (and standard deviation) of 0.60° ± 1.64°; it was the most accurate but also had the highest degree of intersubject variability. The mean PCA-sTEA angle was 2.40°, close to the accepted "rule of thumb" of 3°. This value was significantly higher in women (2.64° ± 1.74°) than in men (2.18° ± 1.52°; p < 0.001). The Whiteside line differed from the sTEA by a mean of 1.90° ± 1.38°, and the sulcus line differed from the sTEA by a mean of 1.94° ± 1.49°; neither of these values varied significantly with sex or ethnicity. The FTA differed from the sTEA by a mean of 2.04° ± 1.50°. Least accurate was the aTEA, which differed from the sTEA by a mean of 2.05° ± 1.33°. The combination of 3 axes that are readily available intraoperatively (the Whiteside line, aTEA, and PCA+3°ER) differed from the sTEA by a mean of 1.80° ± 0.70°.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study of its kind, analysis of CT scans of 2,128 femora revealed that no 1 axis could serve as a marker of femoral component rotation with both high accuracy and low variability. Utilizing a combination of 3 methods (PCA+3°ER, the Whiteside or sulcus line, and aTEA) to maximize accuracy and sex and ethnic generalizability when positioning the femoral component is recommended.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A large-scale study using a CT-based biomorphometric database demonstrated that use of a combination of 3 axes (PCA+3°ER, the Whiteside or sulcus line, and aTEA) was the optimal strategy for judging femoral component rotation.

Prospective, observational study to evaluate the relation between patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: protocol for the CRACK study

INTRODUCTION

Total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis results in a satisfactory outcome in the majority of patients, although up to one in five patients may be dissatisfied with the outcome. Persistent pain is a main contributor to patient dissatisfaction, and femoral and tibial component malrotation have been identified as a potential cause for both persistent pain and patellofemoral problems. Based on the assumption that component malrotation is the causative factor for persistent pain, early revision for patients with symptomatic malrotated components has been advocated in the literature. However, convincing evidence that component malrotation indeed results in less than optimal outcomes is lacking. This study aims to assess the relation between knee prosthesis component rotation and patient-reported outcomes in a large group of patients and to determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this single-centre, prospective observational cohort study, a total of 500 patients will undergo TKR. All patients will have a 3D-CT assessment of femoral and tibial component rotation within 8 weeks after surgery. Outcome measures will include the Oxford Knee Score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D, visual analogue scale for pain, the American Knee Society Score and the knee joint range of motion. We will assess the relation between femoral, tibial and combined component rotation and patient-reported outcome measures at 8 weeks and 1 year of follow-up, and we will determine the range of femoral, tibial and combined rotation that results in the best clinical outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the Isala Hospital ethics committee. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL7635.

Intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement in three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of component positions after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Accurate evaluation of the postoperative position of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is crucial in the analysis of the association of alignments with clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of measurements of component positions after TKA using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) reconstruction.

METHODS

Two independent orthopedic surgeons (an attending surgeon and a fellow) examined 30 knees after primary TKA. The coronal, sagittal, and rotational positions of the femoral and tibial components were measured twice at an interval of six weeks on 3D-CT images reconstructed using ZedKnee software. Mean intra- and interobserver differences of measured angles were calculated, and the intra- and interobserver reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), with agreement assessed by Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The mean intraobserver difference between alignment measurements for femoral and tibial components was <2° (range 0.23-1.17°) and the mean interobserver difference was <1° (range 0.22-0.97°). The intra- and interobserver ICCs were >0.8 for all component positions. The only systematic bias found in the intra- and interobserver agreements occurred for the sagittal position of the femoral component.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional-CT measurements of component positions after TKA showed good intra- and interobserver reliability for the femoral and tibial components in coronal, sagittal and rotational positions. The intra- and interobserver agreements were favorable for all but the sagittal position of the femur. These results suggest that 3D-CT can be used to evaluate the alignment of all TKA components except for the sagittal position of the femur.

[Predictors for persistent pain and dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of patients patients suffer from persistent pain or are unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

OBJECTIVES

This work aims to present the frequency of postoperative persistent pain and/or dissatisfaction as well as known causes and predictors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current literature is studied regarding the subject and is reviewed narratively.

RESULTS

Most postoperative problems did not arise from operation details, but from patient-related criteria, a lack of patient education and selection. The satisfaction correlates most strongly with the reduction of preoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

For a successful TKA, care should be taken that the following aspects are met preoperatively: clinically and radiologically advanced osteoarthritis, a patient age preferably older than 60 years, sufficient psychosocial resources to cope with postoperative stress, no opioid medication and realistic expectations after TKA. Postoperatively, patients with persistent pain or dissatisfaction should be checked for any prosthesis-related problems. If no prosthesis-related problems could be detected, the patients should be referred for interdisciplinary therapies.

Improved Range of Motion and Patient-Reported Outcome Scores With Fixed-Bearing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Suboptimal Axial Implant Rotation

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal implant rotation has consequences with respect to knee kinematics and clinical outcomes. We evaluated the functional outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for poor axial implant rotation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 42 TKAs undergoing aseptic revision for poor axial implant rotation. We assessed improvements in Knee Society Score (KSS) and final range of motion (ROM). Subgroup analyses were performed for preoperative instability and stiffness, as well as the number of components revised and level of implant constraint used.

RESULTS

Revision for poor axial rotation in isolation improved KSS from 52 ± 22 to 84 ± 25 (P < .001), and flexion increased from 105 ± 21° to 115 ± 13° (P = .001). Revision in the setting of instability significantly improved the KSS (P < .001) but did not affect ROM (P = .172). Revision in the setting of stiffness significantly improved both KSS (P < .001) and ROM (P = .002). There was no statistically significant difference between the postoperative KSS (P = .889) and final knee flexion (P = .629) with single- or both-component revision TKA for isolated poor axial rotation or between the postoperative KSS (P = .956) and final knee flexion (P = .541) with or without the use of higher constraint during revision TKA for isolated poor axial rotation.

CONCLUSION

Revision TKA for poor axial alignment improves clinical outcomes scores and functional ROM.

Bony landmarks with tibial cutting surface are useful to avoid rotational mismatch in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to define various anteroposterior axes of the tibial component as references and to evaluate their accuracy and variability using virtual surgery. It was hypothesized that (1) Akagi's Line could result in high accuracy and low variability in varus osteoarthritic knees; (2) anteroposterior axes defined by using the tibial bony cutting surface as a landmark might be good substitutes for Akagi's Line; and (3) extra-articular bony landmarks might influence the variability of the anteroposterior axis.

METHODS

Three-dimensional bone models were reconstructed from the preoperative computed tomography data of 111 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformities. Seven different anteroposterior axes of the tibial component were defined: Akagi's Line, Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED, Axis of Oval Shape, Axis of Anterior Crest, and Axis Second Metatarsus. The rotational mismatch angle was measured between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the line perpendicular to the transepicondylar axis projected on the cutting surface (positive value: external rotation of the tibial anteroposterior axis).

RESULTS

The average rotational mismatch angles (referring to the projected anatomical/surgical epicondylar axes) were - 2.7° ± 5.8°/1.0° ± 6.0° (Akagi's Line), - 4.2° ± 7.7°/- 0.5° ± 7.8°, 2.9° ± 7.2°/6.6° ± 7.2°, 9.8° ± 7.0°/13.5° ± 6.8° (Axis MED, Axis 1/6MED, Axis 1/3MED), - 5.1° ± 7.9°/- 1.4° ± 7.8° (Axis of Oval Shape), and 19.3 ± 9.5°/23.0° ± 9.6°, - 2.0° ± 11.3°/1.7° ± 11.4° (Axis Anterior Crest, Axis Second Metatarsus), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Akagi's Line provided the best accuracy and least variability in varus osteoarthritic knees. Axis 1/6MED and Axis MED are good substitutes for Akagi's Line due to the difficulty of identifying the attachment site of the posterior cruciate ligament after the proximal tibia has been cut. Extra-articular bony landmarks should not be used for alignment due to their high variability. This study will aid surgeons in choosing the proper anteroposterior axis of the tibial component to reduce rotational mismatch and thus achieve good clinical knee outcomes.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

Coronal tibial alignment is linked to femoral rotational asymmetry: Implications for total knee arthroplasty surgery

BACKGROUND

Femoral rotational asymmetry (FRA) is the difference in rotational alignment between the trochlear groove and posterior condyles. We hypothesize that FRA increases as the tibial plateau becomes more varus due to internal rotation of the posterior condyles and external rotation of the trochlear groove to ensure a vertical trochlear groove at 90^o knee flexion.

METHODS

Seventy lower limb Computed Tomography (CT) scans were reviewed by two examiners. Comparisons were made between both the sulcus line (SL) and posterior condylar line (PCL) relative to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA). Femoral and tibial coronal alignment were measured on CT scanograms and 3D reconstructions. Correlation analysis was performed to identify associations between FRA, SL and PCL and the coronal alignment of the tibia and femur.

RESULTS

The mean FRA was +2.9° (SL externally rotated to PCL) (-2.4° to +7.7°, SD 2.2^o). FRA greater than four degrees occurred in (17/70) 24% of knees. A statistically significant correlation was found between the degree of FRA and proximal tibial varus (MPTA) (R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were significant correlations between the SL and the MPTA (p < 0.001, R² = 0.77) and the PCL and the MPTA (p < 0.001, R² = -0.41).

CONCLUSION

Native femora are frequently rotationally asymmetrical. As the tibial plateau becomes increasingly varus there is an increase in external rotation of the SL and internal rotation of the PCL. The effect is to maintain a more vertical trochlear groove during flexion in the presence of a varus tibia.

Accurate determination of post-operative 3D component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: the AURORA protocol

Background

Successful component alignment is a major metric of success in total knee arthroplasty. Component translational placement, however, is less well reported despite being shown to affect patient outcomes. CT scans and planar X-rays are routinely used to report alignment but do not report measurements as precisely or accurately as modern navigation systems can deliver, or with reference to the pre-operative anatomy.

Methods

A method is presented here that utilises a CT scan obtained for pre-operative planning and a post-operative CT scan for analysis to recreate a computation model of the knee with patient-specific axes. This model is then used to determine the post-operative component position in 3D space.

Results

Two subjects were investigated for reproducibility producing 12 sets of results. The maximum error using this technique was 0.9° ± 0.6° in rotation and 0.5 mm ± 0.3 mm in translation. Eleven subjects were investigated for reliability producing 22 sets of results. The intra-class correlation coefficient for each of the three axes of rotation and three primary resection planes was > 0.93 indicating excellent reliability.

Conclusions

Routine use of this analysis will allow surgeons and engineers to better understand the effect of component alignment as well as the placement on outcome.

Femoral malrotation from diaphyseal fractures results in changes in patellofemoral alignment and higher patellofemoral stress from a finite element model study

BACKGROUND

Malrotation of the femur is a frequent complication in the management of a diaphyseal fracture. It is often responsible for pain and adverse functional results. Among these complications, contact stress effects on the patellofemoral joint are recognized as predictive factors of impaired results. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of malrotation on stress distribution on the patellofemoral joint, using radiological measurement and three-dimensional finite element models.

METHODS

Functional analysis of the patellofemoral joint was evaluated in eight knee pairs from patients with unilateral femoral fractures and subsequent femoral malrotation. A computed tomography-based protocol allowed patellofemoral joint analysis. A finite element model of the healthy (contralateral) knee was then created from 3D reconstruction at 30° flexion. In a finite element model, incremental rotational malalignment was simulated to observe changes in stress distribution on the patellar surface.

RESULTS

Femoral malrotation was associated with anomalies of patellofemoral joint rotational alignment. Internal rotation resulted in increased stress on the lateral side of the patella, and external rotation increased inferior medial side stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotational disorders of the distal femur resulted in increased stress on the patellofemoral joint and alignment changes. Malrotation in internal and external rotation might cause patellofemoral pain syndrome from rotations <10°. Care should be taken especially for internal malrotation in the management of femoral shaft fracture.

Measurement techniques to determine tibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty are less accurate than we think

BACKGROUND

The present study assessed the inter- and intra-observer reliability of tibial and femoral rotation measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and evaluated the correlation between these measurement techniques and their clinical relevance.

METHODS

Femoral rotation and tibial rotation were determined on 42 2D CT-scans made three-months after TKA. Reliability of the radiological measurements (including Berger's method, the anatomical tibial axis and the tibial tuberosity trochlear-groove) was assessed with 15 randomly selected patients measured twice by three observers. Functional outcomes were scored one-year postoperatively with the KSS, VAS pain, VAS satisfaction, KOOS, and Kujala.

RESULTS

The inter- and intra-observer reliability of the rotational measurements ranged from good to excellent (ICC 0.67-0.98). Tibial rotation measured with the Berger technique was most reliable (ICC inter = 0.91; ICC intra = 0.96). No strong correlations were found between the different rotational measures or the clinical outcomes and rotational outliers.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibial rotation is most reliable measured with the technique described by Berger. There were no strong correlations found between the different tibial rotation measures or between the clinical outcomes and the rotational outliers. Further research is needed to gain more insight into optimal positioning and measuring rotation in TKA for clinical practice.

Total knee replacement modifies the preoperative tibial torsion angle-similar results between computer-assisted and standard technique

Background

Malpositioning of the components in total knee replacement (TKR) can result in failure or deficient outcomes of the surgical procedure. In the tibial segment, the rotational position of the tray should reproduce the mechanical axis without modifying physiological tibial torsion.

Methods

A randomised, prospective study was made of 74 patients subjected TKR involving the standard technique (38 cases) and navigation surgery (36 cases). A computed tomography study of the knee and ankle was made before the operation and after arthroplasty implantation, in order to identify the position of the prosthetic tibial tray in the transverse axis and the tibial torsion angle.

Results

The rotation of the tibial tray changed from its preoperative to postoperative range, but no significant differences were found between the navigated and the standard groups. The presence of preoperative deformities in the frontal plane did not modify the changes in the rotation of the tibial component. The mean preoperative tibial torsion angle was 17.76º (SD =10.15) of external rotation, with no significant differences in relation to the previous frontal deformity. After TKR, the tibial torsion angle was 15.36º (SD =7.16) (P=0.021). There were no differences in final tibial torsion between the knees operated upon with the standard instruments and those subjected to computer-assisted surgery (CAS; P=0.157).

Conclusions

TKR surgery modifies preoperative tibial torsion. Neither mechanical instrumentation nor navigation surgery precisely reproduces the rotational axis of the leg.

Tibial internal rotation negatively affects clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the effect of tibial rotational alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on clinical outcomes and assess the eventual cut-off values for tibial TKA rotation leading to poor outcomes.

METHODS

A detailed and systematic search from 1997 to 2017 of the Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews, and the Google Scholar databases was performed using the keyword terms "total knee arthroplasty", "total knee replacement", "tibial alignment", "tibial malalignement", "tibial rotation", "rotational error", "axis", "angle", "tibial malrotation", "clinical outcome", in several combinations. The modified Coleman scoring methodology (mCMS) was used. All the primary TKAs studies analyzing correlation between clinical results and tibial rotation were included.

RESULTS

Five articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 333 arthroplasties were included in this review; 139 had tibial component malalignment, while 194 were in control groups. The mean age of patients was 67.3 (SD 0.57) years. The mean average postoperative follow-up delay was 34.7 months (range 21-70). The mean mCMS score was 59.2 points indicating good methodological quality in the included studies. Functional outcomes were assessed through KSS, OKS, KOOS and VAS, negatively related to tibial internal rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review confirmed that excessive internal rotation of the tibial TKA component represents a significant risk factor for pain and inferior functional outcomes after TKA (> 10° of internal rotation demonstrated the common value), since external rotation does not affect the results. However, a universal precise cut-off value has not been found in the available literature and there remains a debate about CT rotation assessment and surgical intra-operative landmarks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Is distal femoral torsion the same in both of a patient's legs? Morphometric CT study

INTRODUCTION

The rotational position of the femoral component is a primary driver of success in total knee arthroplasty. However, distal femoral torsion (DFT) varies greatly between individuals. Measuring DFT preoperatively by CT in combination with computer-assisted surgery can significantly improve the rotational positioning of the femoral component. However, a preoperative CT scan is costly and exposes the patient to radiation. These are doubled when the patient is undergoing bilateral arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to determine the DFT in both knees of a patient undergoing bilateral arthroplasty. We hypothesized that DFT was symmetric between a patient's two knees and was independent of frontal alignment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study of TKA cases performed between December 2008 and March 2015, 82 patients (mean age 73years) who underwent two-stage bilateral TKA (164 knees) were included. A preoperative CT scan of each knee was performed to measure the DFT using the surgical posterior condylar angle (PCA) described by Yoshioka. Two observers performed the measurements twice each, to allow calculation of the intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The mean PCA was 5.4° (±1.48) in the right knee and 5.4° (±1.45) in the left knee, with a left/right difference ranging from 0 to 2.2° (p=0.8). In the entire cohort, 84.6% of patients had a left/right difference of less than 1°. We found no significant differences in DFT in knees with large or small frontal deformity (deformity<10°, p=0.7; deformity>10°, p=0.5) or the presence of varus or valgus (p=0.9). The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (94%) and the interclass correlation coefficient was moderate to good (60% for left knees, 53% for right knees).

DISCUSSION

Based on CT scan measurements, the DFT in both knees of an arthritic patient is comparable and this measurement is reproducible. This means that a single, unilateral preoperative CT scan is sufficient for planning purposes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective cohort study).

Medial parapatellar approach leads to internal rotation of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate if the type of approach [medial parapatellar approach (MPA) versus lateral parapatellar approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy (LPA)] influences rotation of femoral and/or tibial component and leg axis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was the hypothesis that MPA leads to an internally rotated tibial TKA component.

METHODS

This study included 200 consecutive patients in whom TKA was performed using either a parapatellar medial (n = 162, MPA) or parapatellar lateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy (n = 38, LPA). All patients underwent clinical follow-up, standardized radiographs and computed radiography (CT). TKA components' position and the whole leg axis were assessed on 3D reconstructed CT scans (sagittal, coronal and rotational). Mean values of TKA component position and the whole leg alignment of both groups were compared using a t test. The tibial component was graded as internally rotated (<3° of external rotation (ER)), neutral rotation (equal or between 3° and 6° of ER) and externally rotated (>6° ER). The femoral component was graded as internally rotated [>3° of internal rotation (IR)], neutral rotation (equal or between -3° IR and 3° of ER) and externally rotated (>3° ER).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of whole leg axis after TKA between both groups (MPA: 0.2° valgus ± 3.4; LPA: 0.0° valgus ± 3.5). Means of tibial component rotation were 2.7° ER ± 6.1 (MPA) and 7.6° ER ± 5.4 (LPA). Patients of group LPA presented a significantly less internally rotated (LPA: 18.4%; MPA: 48.8%) and more externally rotated (LPA: 52.6%; MPA: 22.8%) tibial component (p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen for the femoral component position, tibial valgus/varus and tibial slope.

CONCLUSION

The type of approach (medial versus lateral) significantly influenced tibial TKA component rotation. It appears that a MPA tends to internally rotate the tibial TKA component and a LPA tends to externally rotate the tibial TKA. The anterior cortex should not be used as landmark for tibial TKA component placement when using the lateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

A computer-assisted, tibia-first technique for improved femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty

Background

The use of navigation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves limb alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes. However, similar improvements in femoral and tibial component rotation have not yet been realized using currently available systems.

Methods

We developed a modified navigated TKA technique in which femoral rotation was set using the resected tibial plane as the reference with the aim of achieving a rectangular flexion gap. Limb alignment was assessed in a cohort of 30 knees using the navigation system. Post-operative limb alignment was measured using long-leg standing radiographs. Computed tomography was used to determine post-operative component orientation.

Results

Sagittal alignment data improved from a mean of 7.8° varus (pre-operative) to 0.0° (post-operative), assessed by intra-operative navigation. Post-operative hip-knee-ankle axis alignment was 0.9° valgus (mean; standard deviation [SD] 1.7°). Mean femoral component rotation was 0.5° internally rotated (SD 2.6°), relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Mean tibial component rotation was 0.9° externally rotated (SD 5.5°). No soft tissue releases were performed.

Conclusions

These results confirm that the desired femoral rotation, set using a tibia-first approach with the resected tibial plane as the reference, can be achieved without compromising overall limb alignment. Femoral component rotation was within a narrow range, with a moderate improvement in achieving more consistent tibial component rotation compared with other techniques. This technique may prove to be useful for surgeons wishing to employ a tibia-first philosophy for TKA while maximizing the benefits associated with computer-assisted navigation.

Unexplained pain following total knee arthroplasty: Is rotational malalignment the problem?

BACKGROUND

Malrotation of tibial and femoral components is a potential source of pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to 1) compare component rotation in TKA patients with unexplained pain versus a control group with well-functioning TKAs and 2) investigate the relationship between TKA component rotation and pain.

METHODS

Seventy one patients with unexplained pain after primary TKA were compared to a control cohort of 41 well functioning TKA patients. Both groups underwent post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans to assess component rotation. Findings were compared between the painful and control TKA groups.

RESULTS

We found no difference in femoral component rotation between the painful and control groups (mean 0.6° vs 1.0° external rotation (ER), p=0.4), and no difference in tibial component rotation (mean 11.2° vs 9.5° internal rotation (IR), p=0.3). Also, there was no difference in combined mal-rotation (tibial+femoral rotation) between the groups (mean 10.5° vs 8.5°IR, p=0.25). Fifty-nine percent of patients in the painful group had tibial component rotation >9°IR vs 49% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

In the largest study yet on component rotation after TKA, we found no difference in the incidence of tibial, femoral, or combined component mal-rotation in painful versus well-functioning TKAs. Tibial component IR relative to the junction of the medial to middle thirds of the tibial tubercle appears to be common in patients with well-functioning TKAs. The significance of slight tibial IR should be interpreted with caution when evaluating the painful TKA. Level III retrospective case-control study.

Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in a high degree of patient satisfaction, as it provides patients with considerable medium- and long-term benefits in terms of quality of life, pain relief and function. Nevertheless, the literature reports that up to 30% of patients are dissatisfied. This dissatisfaction is directly related to the patients' quality of life, which they deem insufficient. Their quality of life depends on many physical, behavioural, social and psychological factors that are not taken into account by functional outcome scores. After describing the principles of quality of life evaluation after TKA, we will assess the effects of patient-related factors, the surgical technique and postoperative program through an exhaustive review of the literature. Patient expectations after TKA will then be outlined, particularly return to work and return to sports.