Epidemiology of scapular fractures. Incidence and classification of 338 fractures

An Unusual Pattern of Scapular Avulsion Fracture in the Spine: A Case Study

Acromion fractures, particularly isolated cases, are uncommon but significant in shoulder injuries. There is no universally accepted treatment protocol, but the classification of the fracture helps to guide clinical decisions. We present a case report aiming to contribute to the understanding of treatment options for acromion fractures. A 22-year-old male sustained a left shoulder injury during a wrestling match, resulting in a type 2 acromion fracture. Conservative treatment was initiated with regular follow-ups. Serial imaging showed no further displacement. Gradual rehabilitation exercises were introduced based on healing progress. The rarity of isolated acromion fractures complicates their management. Conservative management, coupled with rehabilitation exercises, yielded positive outcomes in our case, suggesting its efficacy as a primary treatment option for isolated displaced acromion fractures. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols for managing such fractures, but until then, conservative care remains a viable approach, potentially preferred over surgical intervention.

Glenoid Fracture Fixation Using an Acu-Loc Distal Radius Plate

Displaced fractures of the glenoid require surgical fixation. This poses multiple problems, including a difficult approach and achieving adequate reduction with current implants. We provide a surgical technical tip for fixing scapula neck and glenoid rim fractures with an Acu-Loc distal radius plate (Acumed, Weyhill, UK), illustrated with two recent case reports. Here, we present two cases of a 58-year-old female and a 51-year-old male presenting to a hospital following a fall, both sustaining an isolated right glenoid intra-articular fracture evident on plain radiographs. CT scans revealed a displaced and fragmented glenoid surface. A reverse Judet posterior approach facilitated exposure to enable the reduction of the glenoid, an uncommon approach. Current plate designs provide surgeons with limited options to fix complex fractures of the scapula and were not suitable here. The lateral scapula border and inferior glenoid have a similar anatomical shape to the distal radius. An Acu-Loc locking distal radius plate with a radial styloid plate was trialled and provided a good reduction to the fragmented glenoid. A distal radius plate can be a useful option to consider in complex scapula neck and glenoid rim fractures. A better understanding of glenoid shape will facilitate the further development of orthopaedic implants. Familiarity with various surgical approaches is needed to operate on these complex fractures.

Epidemiology, treatment, and mortality of 3973 scapula fractures from the Swedish fracture register

BACKGROUND

Scapula fractures are relatively uncommon, accounting for <1% of all fractures and approximately 3%-5% of shoulder girdle fractures. This study comprehensively describes the epidemiology, fracture classification, treatment, and mortality associated with scapula fractures within a large adult Swedish population.

METHODS

This observational study included all patients ≥ 18 years old at the time of injury with a scapula fracture (ICD S42.1) registered in the Swedish Fracture Register between March 2011 and June 2020. Variables studied were age, sex, and injury mechanism, including energy level, fracture classification, associated fractures, treatment, and mortality.

RESULTS

We included 3930 patients (mean age 58 years, standard deviation 18, 64% men) with 3973 scapula fractures. Some 22% of the fractures were caused by high-energy trauma and 21% had at least 1 associated fracture. High energy-injuries were most common in glenoid neck (44%) and scapular body (35%) fractures. However, same-level falls were the most common cause of glenoid rim (62%) and intra-articular glenoid (55%) fractures. Clavicle fractures (9%) and proximal humerus fractures (5%) were the most commonly associated fractures. The most common fracture types were the glenoid rim (n = 1289, 32%) and scapular body (n = 1098, 28%) fractures. Nonoperative treatment was performed in 81% of patients. Glenoid rim and intra-articular glenoid fractures were treated operatively in over 30% of cases. The mortality rate for the whole cohort was 4% at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Scapula fractures are predominately sustained by men. High energetic injuries and associated fractures are present in 1 in five patients. Nonoperative treatment is chosen in 4 of five patients, but for some fracture types 1 in 3 undergo surgery.

The Role of Arthroscopy in Contemporary Glenoid Fossa Fracture Fixation

Glenoid fossa fractures are rare injuries accounting for 10 to 29% of all intra-articular scapula fractures. They are usually the result of high-energy trauma, and concomitant injuries are not uncommon. Patients with glenoid fractures are admitted with shoulder pain and restricted range of motion. Although shoulder plain radiographs could establish the diagnosis, a computed tomography scan is necessary to adequately define the fracture pattern and characteristics. The most commonly used classification system is that of Ideberg (modified by Goss), which includes five glenoid fossa fracture types according to the location, extension, and complexity of the lesion. Articular surface displacement and step-off are the most important factors that should be taken under consideration when deciding for conservative or surgical management. Operative treatment includes open reduction and internal fixation through a posterior or anterior approach depending on fracture morphology and displacement. However, open surgical techniques are related to extensive soft-tissue disruption, risk of neurovascular injury, and inadequate exposure of the entire glenoid cavity. Introduction of arthroscopy could facilitate better visualization of the glenoid articular surface and improved fracture reduction. However, it is a technically demanding procedure with many challenges and pitfalls. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence regarding the treatment of glenoid fossa fractures and present the beneficial effect of arthroscopy in improving the quality of fracture fixation and overall functional outcomes.

Scapular fractures: A regional and rural perspective

INTRODUCTION

Scapular fractures (SFs) have historically been associated with severe trauma and multiple injuries. Recent studies have demonstrated improved outcomes. However, SFs have never been studied from a strictly rural or Australian perspective.

OBJECTIVE

The study's objective was to assess whether associations still exist between a fractured scapula and trauma scores, mortality rates, and other commonly associated injuries in a regional Australian trauma centre.

DESIGN

The study design examined prospectively collected data from a regional hospital between the years 2012 to 2021 presenting to the emergency department with traumatic SFs. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality rate, method of injury, ISS scores, and associated injuries.

FINDINGS

One hundred and five patients had a SF. The median age was 49 with 93 (89%) being male. Most fractures were located in the body of the scapula (80%). The primary mechanism of injury was motorbike accidents (36%), falls (24%), and motor vehicle accidents (22%). Two patients died from their injuries (1.9%). Thirty-four percent demonstrated mild trauma scores, with 36% moderate, 28% severe, and 1.9% critical. Commonly observed associated injuries included chest wall fractures, vertebral fractures, thoracic injuries, brain injury, and abdominal trauma.

DISCUSSION

A minority of SFs were associated with severe or critical trauma, and overall, patients who sustained a SF had a low mortality rate. These findings suggest that patients from regional areas have similar outcomes to those from more urban centres in other parts of the world.

CONCLUSION

Given these results, a re-examination of whether SFs are a reliable marker of severe trauma should be considered.

Scapula fractures: functional anatomy, clinical assessment and management

Fractures of the scapula are rare injuries, accounting for 3-5% of all shoulder girdle fractures. They are frequently the result of high energy trauma and often present with concurrent and life-threatening injuries to adjacent structures, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Patients presenting with scapula fractures must receive a thorough and systematic clinical assessment as directed by national trauma guidelines. Appropriate imaging is essential in delineating fracture morphology and should at the very least include anteroposterior, anteroposterior oblique (Grashey) and axillary or scapula 'Y' view of the shoulder. Computed tomography imaging with three-dimensional reconstruction allows better delineation of the fracture morphology and helps with surgical planning. A lack of randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of conservative and operative management of scapula fractures has resulted in limited consensus for surgical indications. Nevertheless, most extra-articular fractures can be managed conservatively while intra-articular fractures of the glenoid frequently require surgical fixation.

Three-Dimensional Mapping of Scapular Body, Neck, and Glenoid Fractures

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to report patterns of scapular fractures and define them with a contemporary methodology.

METHODS

.

DESIGN

Retrospective study, 2015-2021.

SETTING

Single, academic, Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Consecutive patients ≥18 years, presenting with unilateral scapula fracture, with thin-slice (≤0.5-mm) bilateral computed tomography (CT) scans of the entirety of both the injured and uninjured scapulae.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Thin-slice (0.5-mm) CT scans of injured and normal scapulae were obtained to create three-dimensional (3D) virtual models. 3D modeling software (Stryker Orthopedics Modeling and Analytics, Stryker Trauma GmbH, Kiel, Germany aka SOMA) was used to create a 3D map of fracture location and frequency. Fracture zones were delineated using anatomic landmarks to characterize fracture patterns.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were identified with 75 (86%) extra-articular and 12 (14%) intra-articular fractures. The dominant fracture pattern emanated from the superior lateral border (zone E) to an area inferior to the spinomedial angle (zone B) and was present in 80% of extra-articular fractures. A second-most common fracture line propagated from the primary (most-common) line toward the inferior medial scapular border with a frequency of 36%. Bare zones (with 1 or no fractures present) were identified in 4 unique areas. Furthermore, intra-articular fractures were found to be heterogenous.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D fracture map created in this study confirmed that extra-articular scapular fractures occur in certain patterns with a relatively high frequency. Results provide greater insight into scapular fracture locations and may help to study prognosis of injury and improve treatment strategy including operative approaches and surgical tactics.

Unrecognized glenoid fracture in opposite shoulders with symptomatic anterior instability

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of unrecognized glenoid fracture in opposite shoulders with symptomatic anterior instability.

METHODS

Participants were 38 patients, who had complaints of instability on only one side (symptomatic shoulder) and had no complaints despite of a glenoid fracture on the other shoulder (asymptomatic shoulder) from 2011 to 2020. Factors that could influence the onset of symptoms including glenoid rim morphology were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

Among the asymptomatic shoulders, 16 had a single traumatic event and 22 had no history of trauma. The glenoid morphology was normal in 6, erosion in 12 and bony Bankart in 20 on the symptomatic side, whereas the respective shoulders were 0, 16 and 22 on the asymptomatic side. Bone union of bony Bankart was complete in 9, partial in 3 and non-union in 8 on the symptomatic side, whereas the respective shoulders were 18, 3 and 1 on the asymptomatic side. The mean glenoid defect size was 10.4% and 7.8%, and the mean bone fragment size was 5.0% and 4.5%, respectively. The mean medial displacement of bone fragments was 2.6 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). A larger glenoid defect (≥10%) was recognized in 19 symptomatic shoulders and 10 asymptomatic shoulders. Among them, erosion was solely recognized in 5 symptomatic shoulders. In shoulders with bony Bankart, all 10 asymptomatic shoulders had a completely or partially united fragment with less than 2 mm displacement. On the other hand, among 14 symptomatic shoulders, united fragment was solely recognized in 8 shoulders, in which medial displacement was less than 2 mm in 3 shoulders.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if a glenoid fracture occurred, symptom such as instability or pain was not always recognized by all patients. Regardless of glenoid defect size, shoulders with a completely or partially united bone fragment and with less than 2 mm displacement were found to be asymptomatic.

[Scapular fractures]

Scapular fractures are rare injuries that require different treatment strategies. Nondisplaced fractures and the majority of scapular body fractures can be treated conservatively, while surgical treatment should be considered for displaced fractures involving the glenoid. Displaced glenoid fractures of appropriate size and intra-articular step formation should be treated surgically. Different classification systems for scapular fractures can support the treatment decision. Postoperative and posttraumatic management should include early mobilization to achieve a good functional outcome. Clear recommendations and treatment algorithms at the evidence level are not available and long-term outcomes of scapular fractures are the subject of further investigation. The results published so far show good to excellent results for surgical and conservative treatment, depending on the type of fracture. Individual patient factors should be considered when planning treatment.

Distractor Application and Dry Arthroscopy to Improve Articular Visualization During Scapula Fracture Surgery Via a Posterior Approach

SUMMARY

Intra-articular glenoid displacement is an indication for open reduction and internal fixation of scapular fractures. However, direct visualization of the glenoid is limited, and articular reductions are typically performed and assessed using extra-articular cortical reduction reads and fluoroscopic imaging. In this technique, we describe the application of a distractor for direct visualization of the glenoid articular surface. In this way, anatomic reduction of the glenoid articular surface can be assessed and achieved. In addition, we discuss the use of a portable, dry arthroscopy when needed. This technique has resulted in good-to-excellent articular reductions by adjusting extra-articular reads that seemed adequate before intra-articular visualization. This technique is safe, requires minimal extra set-up or instruments, and results in good-to-excellent articular reductions.

[Treatment strategies for traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation]

Anterior glenohumeral instability is the most frequent type of shoulder instability. This is often associated with labral and osseous lesions leading to recurrent instability. A detailed medical history, a physical examination and targeted diagnostic imaging are necessary to assess possible pathological soft tissue alterations as well as bony lesions of the humeral head and the glenoid bone. Early surgical treatment has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence, especially in young active athletes, and can avoid secondary damage. Shoulder dislocations in older patients also require a detailed assessment and selection of treatment as persisting pain and limitation of movement can occur due to rotator cuff lesions and nerve injuries. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the currently available evidence and results regarding diagnostic considerations and conservative vs. surgical treatment and time to return to sport after treatment of a primary anterior shoulder dislocation.

[Management of a multifragmentary glenoid fracture : Case report of a two-stage surgical procedure]

This article describes a multifragmentary glenoid fracture in a 65-year-old patient after falling from a height of 2 m. The accident led to complete Y‑shaped destruction of the glenohumeral joint with a large posteroinferior fragment and a large anteroinferior glenoid fragment. The treatment consisted of a two-stage surgical procedure and a combination of open and arthroscopic techniques. First, open surgery of one fragment from the dorsal side was performed using screw osteosynthesis. Arthroscopic refixation of the anterior glenoid fragment (bony Bankart lesion) followed 4 weeks later using a guided Endobutton® technique (Smith & Nephew). Ideberg type 6 multifragmentary glenoid fractures are rare and should be treated surgically, especially with dislocated fragments, instability in the glenohumeral joint and in younger patients. Given the lack of evidence in the literature, individual surgical strategies are necessary.

Open reduction and internal fixation of Ideberg type IA glenoid fractures: Tricks, pearls, and potential pitfalls based on a retrospective cohort of 33 patients focusing on the rehabilitation protocol

INTRODUCTION

The standard treatment of anterior glenaoid fractures carrying > 20% of the glenoid fossa is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). In the herein study, we report our outcomes in a retrospective cohort of anterior and anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures using an accelerated postoperative rehabilitation protocol. A secondary aim is to describe the surgical steps for ORIF of anterior and anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures using the anterior axillary approach, describing the tricks, pearls, and pitfalls of this surgical technique.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of skeletally mature patients treated for an anterior glenoid rim fracture carrying > 20% of the glenoid fossa during a 10-year period were operated on using a vertical axillary incision, osteosynthesis with 2.0-mm cortical screws, and labral repair with small diameter metallic anchors and non-absorbable sutures. Rehabilitation began on the first postoperative day, including passive external rotation exercises and active-assisted flexion, adduction, and abduction exercises as tolerated. The exercises are performed with the patient sitting or lying down. Phase 1 is continued for 6-10 weeks until the patient regains painless, normal, or near-normal ROM. Usually by 10 weeks, the fracture and labrum are healed, so phase 2 rehabilitation begins with strengthening and ROM exercises. Radiologic and clinical outcomes, including active range of motion (ROM), glenohumeral stability, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured.

RESULTS

About 33 patients (35 fractures) had complete medical records and pre- and post-operative imaging exams available for further analysis regarding the surgical protocol, with a mean of 4.8 years. The mean DASH questionnaire was 3.75 ± 9.0 and the mean CM score was 62.5 ± 0.1. Active flexion and internal rotation were recovered in all patients, while external rotation presented an average loss of 8° (p = 0.12) and abduction of 5° (p = 0.33). The mean VAS was 1.1 ± 0.8. No patient reported major or disabling symptoms, or great difficulty or inability to perform daily or recreational activities. No patient presented residual instability of the glenohumeral joint.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort, ORIF using a vertical axillary incision, osteosynthesis with 2.0-mm screws, and labral repair with small diameter metallic anchors and non-absorbable sutures was a safe approach, with a minimal risk of complications and residual instability. The accelerated postoperative rehabilitation protocol, allowing immediate passive external rotation of the operated shoulder, resulted in a non-significant loss of ROM compared to the contralateral side. Therefore, we recommend this management strategy for anterior glenoid rim fractures in patients with unstable shoulder joint after traumatic glenohumeral dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Therapeutic Study (Surgical technique and Retrospective cohort).

Arthroscopic double-row bridge fixation provided satisfactory shoulder functional restoration with high union rate for acute anterior glenoid fracture

PURPOSE

To introduce a novel surgical technique for arthroscopic reduction and double-row bridge fixation using trans-subscapularis tendon portal for anterior glenoid fracture and to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 22 patients who underwent arthroscopic reduction and double-row bridge fixation for an acute anterior glenoid fracture were retrospectively evaluated. Arthroscopic surgery was performed using four portals including a trans-subscapularis tendon portal. All patients underwent 3D-CT preoperatively and one day and one year postoperatively to evaluate the fracture fragment size, reduction status, and presence of fracture union. To evaluate the degree of fragment displacement, articular step-off and medial fracture gap were measured using 3D-CT. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the ASES and Constant scores. Postoperative glenohumeral joint arthritis was evaluated using plain radiographs with the Samilson and Prieto classification.

RESULTS

The average preoperative fracture fragment size was 25.9 ± 5.6%. Articular step-off (preoperative: 6.0 ± 3.3 mm, postoperative one day: 1.1 ± 1.6 mm, P < 0.001) and medial fracture gap (preoperative: 5.2 ± 2.6 mm, postoperative one day: 1.9 ± 2.3 mm, P < 0.001) were improved after surgery. On the postoperative one year 3D-CT, 20 patients achieved complete fracture union, and two patients showed partial union. Postoperative glenohumeral joint arthritis was observed in four patients. At the last visit, the ASES score was 91.8 ± 7.0 and the Constant score was 91.6 ± 7.0.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic reduction and double-row bridge fixation using a trans-subscapularis tendon portal for acute anterior glenoid fracture achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes and anatomical reduction as demonstrated by a low degree of articular step-off and medial fracture gap.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Scapular fractures osteosynthesis via Judet's posterior approach: clinical and radiographic results

PURPOSE

Scapular fractures are uncommon and mainly treated nonoperatively. Judet's posterior approach allows access to the fracture site through the infraspinatus fossa and may be a technical option when ORIF is decided. The aims of this study were to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent scapular body and/or glenoid fractures fixation via Judet's posterior approach.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study, and all patients admitted for scapular fracture who underwent osteosynthesis via Judet's approach between January 2014 and September 2021 were included. At a minimum follow-up of one year, clinical outcomes were analyzed through subjective shoulder value (SSV) and Constant-Murley score (CMS). Strength in external rotation was measured in adduction and in 90° abduction and compared to healthy side. Radiographic analysis evaluated postoperative fracture reduction on CT scan and glenohumeral osteoarthritis according to Samilson's classification at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included with a mean follow-up of 44.9 months. Mean SSV, CMS, and adjusted CMS were 73.8% ± 21.0, 65.8 points ± 19.5, and 72.8% ± 20.8, respectively. Strength in external rotation in adduction of the affected shoulder showed significant impairment when compared with the contralateral side (respectively 7.79 kg ± 4.29 and 12.0 kg ± 3.84, p = 0.02). All fractures healed uneventfully, but five patients (23.8%) required early revision surgery for intra-articular screws in three. Intra-articular gap measure decreased from 3.75 mm ± 1.93 in preoperative to 0.59 mm ± 0.97 after ORIF. The rate of arthritis was 15% at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent scapular fracture osteosynthesis via Judet's posterior approach exhibited satisfactory but incomplete recovery of the affected shoulder as evidenced by functional scores and external rotation strength measurements at a mean follow-up of 44.9 months. Because of the risk of intra-articular screws, postoperative CT scan is mandatory.

Musculoskeletal Computed Tomography: How to Add Value When Reporting Adult Upper Limb Trauma

ABSTRACT

There is increasing reliance on computed tomography to evaluate fractures and dislocations following routine evaluation with plain radiography, critical in preoperative planning; computed tomography can provide multiplanar reformats and 3-dimensional volume-rendered imaging, providing a better global assessment for the orthopedic surgeon. The radiologist plays a critical role in appropriately reformatting the raw axial images to illustrate best the findings that will help determine further management. In addition, the radiologist must succinctly report the pertinent findings that will have the most significant bearing on treatment, assisting the surgeon in deciding between nonoperative and operative management. The radiologist should also carefully review imaging to look for ancillary findings in the setting of trauma beyond the bones and joints, including the lungs and rib cage when visualized.In this review article, we will systematically describe key features for fractures of the scapula, proximal humerus, distal humerus, radial head and neck, olecranon, coronoid process through a case-based approach, and distal radius. Although there are numerous detailed classification systems for each of these fractures, we aim to focus on the core descriptors that underpin these classification systems. The goal is to provide the radiologist with a checklist of critical structures they must assess and findings that they should mention in their report, emphasizing those descriptors that influence patient management.

Mapping of Orthopaedic Fractures for Optimal Surgical Guidance

Orthopaedic fractures may be difficult to treat surgically if accurate information on the fracture propagation and its exit points are not known. Even with two-dimensional (2D) radiographic images, it is difficult to be completely certain of the exact location of the fracture site, the fracture propagation pattern and the exit points of the fracture. Three-dimensional (3D) computerised tomographic models are better in providing surgeons with the extent of bone fractures, but they may still not be sufficient to allow surgeons to plan open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) surgery.Fracture patterns and fracture maps are developed to be visual tools in 2D and 3D. These tools can be developed using fractured bones either before or after fracture reduction. Aside from being beneficial to surgeons during pre-surgical planning, these maps aid bioengineers who design fracture fixation plates and implants for these fractures, as well as represent fracture classifications.Fracture maps can be either created ex silico or in silico. Ex silico models are created using 3D printed bone models, onto which fracture patterns are marked. In silico fracture models are created by tracing the fracture lines from a fractured bone to a healthy bone template on a computer. The points of interest in both of these representations are the path of fracture propagation on the bone's surface and exit zones, which eventually determine the surgeon's choice of plate and fracture reduction. Both ex silico and in silico fracture maps are used for pre-surgical planning by the surgeons where they can plan the best way to reduce the fracture as well as template various implants in a low-risk environment before performing the surgery.Recently, fracture maps have been further digitised into heat maps. These heat maps provide visual representations of critical regions of fractures propagating through the bone and identify the weaker zones in the bone structure. These heat maps can allow engineers to develop optimal surgical plates to fix an array of fracture patterns propagating through the bone. Correlation of fractured regions with the mechanisms of injury, age, gender, etc. may improve fracture predictability in the future and optimise the intervention, along with making sure that surgeons do not miss fractures of the bone that may otherwise be hidden from plain sight.

Thoracic trauma: Clinical and paleopathological perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Although trauma is one of the most significant areas of study in paleopathology, most studies focus on fractures of single anatomical elements. Paleopathological research on regional trauma, such as of the thorax, is rare. This paper explores the causes, complications, and consequences of adult thoracic trauma using clinical data in order to inform paleopathological research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Trends in paleopathological thoracic trauma literature were assessed by evaluating publications from Bioarchaeology International, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, International Journal of Paleopathology, and American Journal of Biological Anthropology. Clinical publications on thoracic trauma throughout time were also assessed through a PubMed search, and modern prevalence data was found through trauma databases such as the National Trauma Databank.

RESULTS

Consideration of thoracic trauma involving concomitant injuries is a recent trend in clinical literature and patient care, but paleopathological research on thoracic trauma has been limited. Since thoracic fractures tend to occur in conjunction with other injuries, assessing them together is critical to the interpretation of trauma in the past.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical research into thoracic fractures and concomitant injuries provides valuable data for paleopathological research. Evaluating the likelihood and consequences of concomitant injury in skeletal remains provides a more robust understanding of trauma in the past and its impact on past lifeways.

SIGNIFICANCE

This paper provides a review of current clinical and paleopathological literature on thoracic trauma and demonstrates the importance of moving beyond the analysis of fractures or trauma of single anatomical elements.

LIMITATIONS

Thoracic bones are often taphonomically altered and differentially preserved leading to difficulty in identifying and interpreting fractures.

SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Practical application of the data presented here to archaeological samples will help to advance paleopathological understandings of thoracic trauma.

Treatment and outcome in combined scapula and rib fractures: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The primary aim was to describe the population characteristics of patients with combined scapula and rib fractures and outcomes associated with different treatment strategies.

METHODS

All adult (≥ 18 years) patients with concurrent ipsilateral scapula and rib fractures admitted to the study hospital between 1st January 2010 and 31st June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 223 patients were admitted with concurrent ipsilateral rib and scapula fractures. A total of 160 patients (72%) were treated conservatively, 63 patients (28%) operatively. Among operatively treated patients, 32 (51%) underwent rib fixation (RF) only, 24 (38%) underwent scapula fixation (SF) only, and seven patients (11%) underwent combined fixation of scapula and ribs (SRF). In general, more severely injured patients were treated with more extensive surgery. RF patients had a median hospital length of stay of 16 days, the SF patients 11 days and SRF patients 18 days. There were no significant differences in complications (pneumonia, recurrent pneumothorax and revision surgery) between groups.

CONCLUSION

Injury severity resulted in different treatment modalities. As a result, different patient characteristics between treatment groups were observed, which makes direct comparison between treatment modalities impossible. All treatment modalities seem feasible; however, the additional value of both rib and scapula fixation has yet to be proven in large multicentre studies.

The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather epidemiological information on selected musculoskeletal injuries and to provide pooled injury-specific incidence rates.

Methods

PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported incidence rate (or count with population at risk), contained data on adult population, and were written in English language. The number of cases and population at risk were collected, and the pooled incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either a fixed or random effects model.

Results

The screening of titles yielded 206 articles eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 173 (84%) articles provided sufficient information to be included in the pooled incidence rates. Incidences of fractures were investigated in 154 studies, and the most common fractures in the whole adult population based on the pooled incidence rates were distal radius fractures (212.0, 95% CI 178.1 to 252.4 per 100,000 person-years), finger fractures (117.1, 95% CI 105.3 to 130.2 per 100,000 person-years), and hip fractures (112.9, 95% CI 82.2 to 154.9 per 100,000 person-years). The most common sprains and dislocations were ankle sprains (429.4, 95% CI 243.0 to 759.0 per 100,000 person-years) and first-time patellar dislocations (32.8, 95% CI 21.6 to 49.7 per 100,000 person-years). The most common injuries were anterior cruciate ligament (17.5, 95% CI 6.0 to 50.2 per 100,000 person-years) and Achilles (13.7, 95% CI 9.6 to 19.5 per 100,000 person-years) ruptures.

Conclusion

The presented pooled incidence estimates serve as important references in assessing the global economic and social burden of musculoskeletal injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(11):814–825.

A Comprehensive Radiologic Review of Shoulder Girdle Trauma

Radiologic knowledge of different fracture patterns involving the shoulder girdle is an important tool to generate clinically relevant reports, identify concomitant injuries, guide management decisions, and predict and minimize complications, such as nonunion, osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, and hardware failure. Complex unstable injuries like scapulothoracic dissociation can also occur because of shoulder girdle trauma. Management options may vary from conservative to surgical, depending on the fracture type and patient factors. Injuries around the shoulder girdle can involve the glenohumeral articulation, scapula, superior shoulder suspensory complex, acromioclavicular joints, and scapulothoracic articulation.

Open Screw Fixation of Large Anterior Glenoid Rim Fractures Using a Deltopectoral Approach With Subscapularis Splitting

Anterior glenoid rim fracture is a consequence of the humeral head impacting the glenoid fossa. The management of large glenoid fractures involving more than 20% of the articulating glenoid requires surgical treatment. The 2 main techniques are open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) by screws and arthroscopic treatment using suture anchors or transcutaneous screws. Next to the technical equipment, a surgeon requires extensive experience to achieve good results with the arthroscopic technique. The main disadvantage using the ORIF technique is the detachment of the subscapularis muscle, which is often criticized for causing functional deficits of the subscapularis. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of the ORIF technique through a deltopectoral approach and splitting of the subscapularis. To our knowledge, subscapularis splitting has never been described to treat glenoid fractures.

Operative treatment of complex intra-articular scapular fractures: long-term functional outcomes in a single-center study

BACKGROUND

Scapula fractures occur in the setting of high-energy trauma. Operative treatment of complex intra-articular scapular fractures can result in adequate surgical and functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with complex, displaced intra-articular scapular fractures with or without involvement of the scapular body, were treated operatively in a single trauma center between 2010 and 2021. Associated injuries such as ipsilateral upper limb fractures and nerve injuries were identified in the majority of the patients. Fixation with anatomical medial and lateral border precontoured plates was utilized following posterior modified Judet approach or/and anterior deltopectoral approach. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score and detailed shoulder range of motion and return to work/activities data were obtained.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 69 months (range 4-135 months), individual functional outcomes for 25 of the 27 patients revealed a mean Oxford Shoulder Score of 33 (69%), mean active flexion of 120 degrees, active abduction of 110 degrees, mean active external rotation of 35 degrees and mean internal rotation to the level of T5. All patients were pain-free at the latest follow-up, and 23 of 25 had returned to their preinjury occupation and activities.

CONCLUSION

Operative treatment for these complex injuries is a viable option at centers equipped to handle critically ill patients and can result in satisfactory range of motion and functional score measurements along with a relatively low number of complications.

Modified Double-Row and Double-Pulley Technique for the Treatment of Type Ia Scapular Glenoid Fractures

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of the double‐row and double‐pulley technique in treating anterior shoulder glenoid fracture (Ideberg type Ia) using shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

Thirty‐six patients with Ideberg type Ia admitted from March 1, 2017, to March 1, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Data of the patients' history included age, sex, side of the affected arm, the mean time from injury to surgery, the surgical duration, the average blood loss, and the average total duration of hospital stay. The double‐row and double‐pulley technique was used to repair the scapular glenoid fracture under arthroscopy. Computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate fracture healing after surgery. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder joint scoring system, and the Constant–Murley shoulder function score were used to assess the function of the affected shoulder.

Results

The surgical duration was 90–150 min, with a mean of 127 min. The average blood loss was 90 mL (range, 60–120 mL), and the average total duration of hospital stay was 9.2 days (range, 3 to 14 days). At 9 months after surgery, the CT results showed that all fractures healed, and all patients returned to their previous levels of activity and regained an excellent range of motion. The visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7.55 ± 1.32 before surgery, and the VAS score significantly decreased to 1.24 ± 0.72 at 12 months after the operation (p < 0.05). The Constant, ASES, and UCLA shoulder function scores were 44.38 ± 2.16, 43.47 ± 12.76, and 21.80 ± 1.16 before the surgery, respectively, which improved to 93.52 ± 2.82, 91.34 ± 8.28, and 33.24 ± 1.64, respectively, in the following 12 months. One patient experienced fat liquefaction. However, no cases of deep venous thrombosis, iatrogenic neurovascular compromise, wound infection, or neurovascular injury were identified.

Conclusion

The double‐row and double‐pulley technique for treating Ideberg type Ia under shoulder arthroscopy has minor surgical trauma, reliable fracture reduction and fixation, less postoperative pain, and fewer postoperative complications and significantly improves the patient's shoulder joint function.

Arthroskopische Schraubenfixation einer transversen Glenoidfraktur

Transverse Glenoidfrakturen sind selten und treten meist mit Begleitverletzungen auf. Vorgestellt wird der Fall eines 50-jährigen Mannes, der eine Glenoidfraktur (Typ III nach Ideberg) als Teilverletzung des „superior shoulder suspensory complex“ erlitt. Die Schraubenfixation erfolgte arthroskopisch durch ein hohes, anteromediales Portal. Auf die übliche Anlage des Neviaser-Portals wurde verzichtet. Nach 3 Monaten konnte ein sehr gutes klinisches Ergebnis und eine Durchbauung der Glenoidfraktur beobachtet werden. Die arthroskopische Versorgung von Typ-III-Glenoidfrakturen stellt eine Alternative zu offenen Verfahren dar.

Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns

Background

Morphology and glenoid involvement determine the necessity of surgical management in scapula fractures. While being present in only a small share of patients with shoulder trauma, numerous classification systems have been in use over the years for categorization of scapula fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the established AO/OTA classification in comparison to the classification system of Euler and Rüedi (ER) with regard to interobserver reliability and confidence in clinical practice.

Methods

Based on CT imaging, 149 patients with scapula fractures were retrospectively categorized by two trauma surgeons and two radiologists using the classification systems of ER and AO/OTA. To measure the interrater reliability, Fleiss kappa (κ) was calculated independently for both fracture classifications. Rater confidence was stated subjectively on a five-point scale and compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Additionally, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on absolute agreement in a two-way random effects model to assess the diagnostic confidence agreement between observers.

Results

In scapula fractures involving the glenoid fossa, interrater reliability was substantial (κ = 0.722; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.676–0.769) for the AO/OTA classification in contrast to moderate agreement (κ = 0.579; 95% CI 0.525–0.634) for the ER classification system. Diagnostic confidence for intra-articular fracture patterns was superior using the AO/OTA classification compared to ER (p < 0.001) with higher confidence agreement (ICC: 0.882 versus 0.831). For extra-articular fractures, ER (κ = 0.817; 95% CI 0.771–0.863) provided better interrater reliability compared to AO/OTA (κ = 0.734; 95% CI 0.692–0.776) with higher diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001) and superior agreement between confidence ratings (ICC: 0.881 versus 0.912).

Conclusions

The AO/OTA classification is most suitable to categorize intra-articular scapula fractures with glenoid involvement, whereas the classification system of Euler and Rüedi appears to be superior in extra-articular injury patterns with fractures involving only the scapula body, spine, acromion and coracoid process.

Identification of recurring scapular fracture patterns using 3-dimensional computerized fracture mapping

BACKGROUND

Scapular fracture fixation and implant selection are guided by the fracture pattern and classification, which requires accurate understanding and interpretation of the fracture lines. Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based fracture pattern analysis enhances a more accurate understanding of the scapular fracture patterns. The purpose of this study was to create scapular fracture maps and identify the frequent fracture patterns using 3D reconstructed CT images.

METHOD

Seventy patients treated for scapular fractures, in a single hospital, were considered for this study. Their CT images were reconstructed into 3D models and the fracture fragments were virtually reduced. The reduced 3D models were first aligned on a 3D template and 2D images were captured on the anterior, posterior, and lateral views. Then each fracture image was aligned on a corresponding 2D template and the fracture lines were transferred to the template. The 3 separate views were used to accurately capture the propagation and exit of the fractures through the scapular anatomy. These fracture lines were compiled and heat maps were generated to identify the frequent fracture zones of the scapula.

RESULT

The observed scapular fractures propagated through multiple regions of the bone. Overall, the 3 most common exit zones in the scapula were the lateral (69%), medial (67%), and superior borders (60%). More specifically, the superior lateral border, medial base of the scapula spine, spinoglenoid notch, and mid-superior border were the most frequent zones of fracture in the scapular body. Simple intra-articular fractures (transverse or oblique type) were the most common (92%) fracture type in the glenoid region.

CONCLUSION

Scapular fractures reveal repeatable patterns. The zones of recurrent fracture patterns can be identified from fracture and heat maps. Graphical plots of fracture and heat maps may assist surgical planning and implant design optimization.

Arthroscopy-Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Glenoid Fracture with Scapular Involvement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: We investigated the superiority of arthroscopy-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for treating glenoid fracture with scapular involvement. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients with glenoid fracture who underwent ARIF or ORIF from 2010–2020. Radiographic outcomes were assessed, and clinical outcomes (active range of motion [ROM], visual analog scale [VAS], Constant, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]) were evaluated 12 months postoperatively. Results: Forty-four patients with Ideberg type II–VI glenoid fractures (ARIF: 20; ORIF: 24; follow-up 12–22 months) were included. Union was achieved in all patients. Active ROM values were comparable between the approaches. Constant and DASH scores were non-significantly better with ARIF (90.9 ± 9.2 vs. 86.6 ± 18.1 [p = 0.341] and 6.8 ± 9.4 vs. 9.3 ± 21.3 [p = 0.626], respectively). However, VAS scores were significantly lower with ARIF (1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 1.4, p = 0.001). Associated intra-articular lesions (articular depressions [80%], superior labral anterior-posterior tear [20%], labral tears [30%]) were found in most ARIF cases and were repaired during ARIF. Conclusions: For glenoid fracture with scapular involvement, ARIF allows accurate diagnosis of fracture pattern and the management of associated intra-articular lesions, with better pain control outcomes than ORIF. Thus, arthroscopy-assistant surgery should be considered in patient with glenoid fracture.

RESULTS OF THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTICULAR SCAPULAR FRACTURES

Introduction:

Scapular fractures are rare injuries and are often associated with high-energy trauma, with joint fractures accounting for only 15% of all scapular fractures. Surgical treatment is indicated for fractures with large deviations and with joint instability.

Objective:

This study evaluates the clinical and functional results after surgical treatment of scapular fractures.

Methods:

Eight patients with scapular fractures were surgically treated between 2013 and 2019. For indication for surgical treatment, mediolateral deviations, glenopolar angle, angular deviations and joint deviations greater than 4 mm were taken into account. Radiographic results of consolidation, range of motion, functional score and visual analogue pain scale were obtained.

Results:

In the mean follow-up of twenty-nine months (13-40 months), all patients presented fracture consolidation. The mean UCLA score was 29 points (with 75% good results and 25% moderate results). Regarding the range of motion, the mean elevation was 146° (ranging from 110° to 60°), lateral rotation of 62° (36-80°) and medial rotation at the level of T7 (T6-T10). The final VAS mean was 2.3. All patients returned to the pre-injury level at work.

Conclusion:

In this series of cases, surgical treatment of scapular articular fractures provided satisfactory results with low rates of complications, showing to be an option in selected cases of deviated fractures. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Instability and results after non-operative treatment of large anterior glenoid rim fractures: is there a correlation between fragment size or displacement and recurrence?

INTRODUCTION

There is little data available on non-operative treatment of anterior glenoid rim fractures (GRF). Nothing is known about fracture size and displacement in comparison to clinical outcomes and instability in a mainly middle-aged patient population. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the results of non-operative treatment in anterior glenoid rim fractures with the special focus on potential instability/recurrence.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were non-operatively treated anterior GRF of at least ≥ 5 mm width using the age- and gender-matched Constant/Murley score (a.-/g.-CMS) and the Western Ontario Instability Index (WOSI). Radiographic parameters (fracture morphology, displacement, major tuberosity fractures and Hill-Sachs lesion using initial CT and radiographs) and the proportion of the fractured glenoid were detected (2D-CT-circle-method) and osteoarthritis (A.P. and axial radiographs) was classified according to Samilson/Prieto. Proportion of fractured glenoid and medial displacement were correlated with the recurrence rate and the clinical scores.

RESULTS

N = 36 patients could be followed-up after a mean of 4.4 years [12-140 month, average age: 58 (± 13, 33-86) years]. The a.-/g.-CMS was 93 (± 11, 61-100) points, and the WOSI was 81% (± 22%, 35-100%) on average. The mean intraarticular displacement was 4 mm (± 3 mm; 0-14 mm). The 2D-circle-method showed a mean glenoid fracture involvement of 21% (± 11, 10-52%). Two cases of frozen shoulders and one case with biceps pathology were associated with the trauma. Within the followed-up patient group re-instability has occurred in n = 2 patients (6%) within the first two weeks after trauma. Osteoarthritis was found in n = 11 cases. There was no correlation between the scores and the fracture size/displacement [(a.-/g.-CMS vs. displacement: r = - 0.08; p = 0.6; vs. size: r = - 0.29; p = 0.2); (WOSI vs. displacement: r = - 0.14; p = 0.4; vs. size: r = - 0.37; p = 0.06)], but very large (≥ 21%) fractures with displacement ≥ 4 mm showed slightly worse results without significant difference (a.-/g.-CMS p = 0.2; WOSI p = 0.2). The apprehension test was negative in all patients at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Non-operative treatment of anterior GRF was associated with overall good results within a mainly middle-aged larger patient group. Re-instability is rare and is not associated with fragment size but can occur in the first weeks after trauma. Size and dislocation of the fracture is not a criterion for the prognosis of potential instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Imaging of traumatic shoulder injuries – Understanding the surgeon’s perspective

Imaging plays a key role in the assessment and management of traumatic shoulder injuries, and it is important to understand how the imaging details help guide orthopedic surgeons in determining the role for surgical treatment. Imaging is also crucial in preoperative planning, the longitudinal assessment after surgery and the identification of complications after treatment. This review discusses the mechanisms of injury, key imaging findings, therapeutic options and associated complications for the most common shoulder injuries, tailored to the orthopedic surgeon’s perspective.

Arthroscopic Screw Fixation Technique for Transverse Glenoid Fractures

Transverse glenoid fractures with a cranial coracoglenoidal fragment (Ideberg type III) can lead to detrimental post-traumatic sequelae. Open surgery requires an extensive surgical approach. Arthroscopic procedures are highly challenging with respect to both fracture reduction and screw osteosynthesis. We present a reproducible arthroscopic technique for a dislocated transverse glenoid fracture using 5 standard portals. Grasping the coracoid with a small, serrated reduction clamp through the anterior portal allows simple and sufficient reduction. Safe screw osteosynthesis can then be performed from cranially without the need to create a Neviaser portal.

Fractures of the coracoid process: a systematic review

Background

Although fracture of the coracoid process (CF) used to be considered rare, it is now more commonly encountered due to increased awareness and advances in imaging methods. This review aimed to analyze reported cases of CF to determine its mechanism and appropriate treatment.

Methods

PubMed and Scopus were searched using the terms "scapula fracture" and "coracoid fracture." The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles concerning CF that described patient characteristics with appropriate images. The exclusion criteria included cases without appropriate images and those with physeal injury or nonunion. Citation tracking was conducted to find additional articles and notable full-text articles in other languages. Fractures were mainly classified using Ogawa's classification.

Results

Ninety-seven studies were identified, including 197 patients (131 men, 33 women; average age 37.0±16.9 years). CF was classified as type I in 77%, type II in 19%, and avulsion fracture at the angle in 5%. Concurrent shoulder girdle injuries included acromioclavicular injury in 33%, clavicular fracture in 17%, acromion or lateral scapular spine fracture in 15%, and anterior shoulder instability in 11%. Among patients with type I CF, 69% had multiple disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. Conservative treatment was applied in 71% of isolated type I CF, while surgical treatment was applied in 76% of type I CF with multiple disruptions. Although the evaluation methods varied, 60% of patients were followed up for more than 6 months, and the outcomes were generally satisfactory for both conservative and surgical treatments.

Conclusion

CF occurred commonly in the age group with higher social activity. The most common fracture type was type I. The possible mechanism of CF is violent traction of the attached muscles, except for avulsion fracture at the angle. Type I CF with multiple disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex requires surgical treatment, whereas conservative care is recommended for isolated type I and type II CFs.

Scapula fractures: a review

A consensus is beginning to emerge about the indications for fixation of fractures involving the glenoid fossa of the scapula. The same cannot be firmly said for extra-articular fractures of the blade or the processes of the scapula, with a good deal of reliance on expert opinion from high-volume centres. There are no randomized controlled studies and the systematic reviews that do exist can only pool the data from available case series, making meaningful meta-analysis of limited value. Interest in scapula fractures has increased of late due to the specific association of fractures of the scapular spine and acromion with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

This review summarizes the available evidence that can assist decision making when faced with a patient with a scapula fracture. Which patients should at least be considered for open reduction and internal fixation, either in the centre where they present or after referral to a more specialist centre? These patients are those with a fracture sufficiently displaced that it interferes with the mechanical function of the shoulder girdle and the aim of fixation is to reduce pain and disability.

Since the majority of scapula fractures heal quickly with non-surgical treatment and do not cause significant disability, decision making can be difficult, and it is perhaps the case that it is easier to err on the side of caution.

However, it seems that there are fracture types, such as significantly displaced double disruptions of the superior suspensory complex, widely displaced lateral column fractures and fractures producing angular deformity of the glenoid process, that benefit from early reduction and stabilization with the expectation of a good outcome for the patient.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:518-525. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210010

Anterior proximal humerus fracture dislocation with concomitant glenoid fracture: An operative challenge! A case report

Introduction

Combined proximal humerus fracture dislocation and glenoid fracture is a rare combination of injuries which presents technical operative challenges. There is little evidence to guide surgical management.

Case Report

We report a case of a proximal humerus fracture with anterior dislocation and glenoid fracture treated in the same sitting with open reduction and internal fixation with angular stability locking plate and cannulated screw. The surgical technique involved standard deltopectoral approach with coracoid osteotomy.

Conclusion

By addressing both fractures operatively at the same time, we reported a satisfactory clinical and functional outcome with bony union of the fracture sites without instability at end of 1 year. Coracoid osteotomy may open an alternative pathway to treat complex proximal humerus injuries with ipsilateral glenoid fracture.

Scapular body fractures: Short-term results of surgical management with extended indications

INTRODUCTION

Scapular body fractures represent less than 1% of all skeletal fractures. Operative criteria and risk factors for scapular fracture instability are well defined. Non-operative management of scapular body fractures show satisfactory results but with shortening and medialization of the scapular body. The aim of this study is to evaluate if surgical treatment will result in an improved quality of life and shoulder function compared to non-operative treatment on patients suffering from a scapular body fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a total of 381 retrospectively identified scapular body fractures, we included 45 patients. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: the surgical treatment (ST, n = 20) group and the non-operative treatment (NOT, n = 25) group. The Non-Union Scoring System (NUSS) was used to assess bone healing on radiographs. The functional evaluation of the two groups during the follow-up were performed using the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH). Complications, reoperation rates, and time until bony union were also documented. The minimum follow-up for this study was designated as 12 months.

RESULTS

The ST group had better mean CSS and QuickDASH scores compared to the NOT group at 1, 3 and 6 months of follow-up. No statistically significant difference was detected at 12 months follow-up. ST group also demonstrated improved results in time until bone union, reduction of rehabilitation time, complications and return to work rates.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that surgical treatment for extraarticular scapular fractures can achieve better short-term functional outcomes (3 to 6 months) compared to conservative treatment.

Functional outcomes of internal fixation of scapula fractures due to high-velocity gunshot injuries

BACKGROUND

Open fractures of the scapula are relatively rare and only a few studies are interested in this subject. This study aims to demonstrate the results of internal fixation of open scapula fractures due to gunshot injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients who had open scapula fractures and were treated by internal fixation through the conventional Judet approach included in this study. Patients were followed up monthly in the first 6 months and every 2 months in the rest of the follow-up. Shoulder range of motion, Constant Shoulder Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score were used for functional evaluation.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 34.6 ± 11.9 months. The average time between injuries and the surgery was 10.5 ± 5.1 days. The average shoulder abduction of the patients was 135.6 ± 18.8°, the average forward flexion of the shoulder was 160 ± 19.2°. The average internal and external rotations of the shoulders were 80 ± 14.1° and 63.1 ± 17.3°, respectively. CSS was calculated as 79.8 ± 14.4, and DASH was calculated as 14.1 ± 14.9.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of open scapula fractures due to gunshot injuries, an internal fixation is a reliable option and the results were comparable with previous studies.

Current challenges and controversies in the management of scapular fractures: a review

Fractures of the scapula are rare and usually associated with high-energy trauma. The unfavorable scapular anatomy, combined with the complexity of the approaches for fracture fixation, make the treatment challenging, even for experienced surgeons. Furthermore, the literature is controversial regarding surgical indications and rationale for treatment. The present review article was designed to address and discuss critical aspects of decision-making for the management of scapular fractures, including surgical indications and patient safety considerations.

Malunions and Nonunions of the Acromion and Coracoid Proceses: A Comparison of Functional Outcomes Before and After Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To assess surgical and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients having operatively reconstructed scapula process malunions and/or nonunions.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Between 2003 and 2018, we identified 16 patients who presented to our institution with symptoms associated with a nonunion or malunion of closed, displaced fractures of the scapula processes after acute injury mechanisms.

INTERVENTION

Surgical osteotomy of the malunion or debridement of the nonunion and subsequent reconstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measured included range of motion, strength, and DASH. Return to work was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Among 13 of the 16 (81%) patients with ≥12 months follow-up, the mean follow-up was 34 months (range, 12-112 months). Three patients were lost to follow-up. The mean DASH score improved from 56.4 ± 22.4 preoperatively to 23.4 ± 22.2 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Among the patients with ≥1-year follow-up, range of motion improved from preoperative to final follow-up in abduction (P = 0.020). Among the 15 of 16 patients for whom occupation data are available, 73% either returned to their original occupation (n = 7) or did not due to reasons other than their reconstructive surgery (n = 4). Two postoperative complications occurred including failure of acromion nonunion fixation at 4 months and went on to heal after revision surgery. All reconstructions united without malunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of the scapula process malunion and nonunion is possible, providing restoration of function and symptom relief, with a low complication rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anatomic healing after non-operative treatment of a large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fracture after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation – a case report

Background

Large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fractures after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation are usually managed by surgical stabilization. Although there is little evidence supporting surgical management, it is often preferred over non-operative treatment. This case report describes non-operative management of such large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fracture with CT- and MRI-based documentation of anatomical healing of the fracture fragment, a finding that has not been described previously.

Case presentation

This case report describes a 49-year-old male, right-hand dominant, carpenter, who had a left-sided primary anterior shoulder dislocation after a fall while skiing. Initial plain radiographs showed a reduced glenohumeral joint with a large, displaced anterior glenoid rim fracture. CT-evaluation showed a centered humeral head, and as per our institutional protocol, non-operative management was initiated. Longitudinal radiographic assessment at 2 weeks, 4.5 months and 12 months showed reduction of the initially severely displaced fracture fragment. MRI- and CT-evaluation after 12 months confirmed anatomical healing of the fragment. At final follow-up, the patient was highly satisfied, although the healing process was complicated by posttraumatic frozen shoulder, which has had almost fully resolved after 12 months.

Conclusions

Given that the glenohumeral joint is concentrically reduced, large (displaced) anterior glenoid rim fractures after traumatic primary shoulder dislocation can be successfully treated non-operatively, with the potential of anatomical fracture fragment healing. Therefore, it remains subject to conservative treatment at our institution and surgical stabilization is reserved for patients with a decentered humeral head or persistent glenohumeral instability.

Arthroscopic treatment of a one-fourth anteroinferior glenoid comminuted fracture-dislocation with concomitant three-part complex proximal humerus fracture in a middle-aged man: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations can occur in high-energy traumas. This injury can be accompanied by a glenoid fracture; however, it is a rare type of complex injury in patients aged under 60 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 53-year-old man presented with a three-part fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus and a severely comminuted glenoid fracture. For the glenohumeral dislocation and proximal humeral fracture, we performed closed reduction using a threaded Steinman pin and fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws. Using arthroscopy, while maintaining humeral traction with the Steinman pin, the intra-articular glenoid fragments were reduced and then fixed with a buttressing headless screw and one suture anchor. After a 6-week immobilization with a shoulder spica cast, rehabilitation was initiated.

RESULTS

We confirmed bony union of the fracture sites after 6 months post-surgery. The patient showed excellent clinical outcomes with a nearly full range of motion without instability CONCLUSIONS: We reported a successful outcome for a complex proximal humeral fracture involving the glenoid using closed reduction and fixation for the proximal humeral fracture and arthroscopic reduction and fixation for the comminuted anteroinferior glenoid fracture.

Acute Fractures of the Glenoid

Glenoid fractures are unique in which they span the fields of orthopaedic traumatology and sports medicine. Treatment of glenoid fractures, whether surgical or nonsurgical, may be challenging and have long-term implications on pain and shoulder function. Plain radiographs are always indicated, and most glenoid fractures will require advanced imaging in the form of CT scan. Two general categories of glenoid fractures exist and differ in mechanism of injury, fracture morphology, and treatment. The first category is glenoid fractures with extension into the scapular neck and body. These fractures are typically from high-energy trauma and are often associated with other orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic injuries. The second category includes glenoid rim fractures, which are typically consequent of lower energy mechanisms and are associated with shoulder instability events. Treatment of glenoid rim fractures is dictated by the size and displacement of the fracture fragment and may be nonsurgical or surgical with either open and arthroscopic techniques. The purpose of this review was to discuss the current evidence on glenoid fractures regarding diagnosis, classification, management, and outcomes.

Glenoid fractures of the shoulder

Glenoid fractures of the shoulder are uncommon.

Any scapular fracture involving the glenoid should be scrutinized carefully for a surgical treatment option.

Classification is helpful in deciding the surgical tactic.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:620-623. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190057

Ideberg type III glenoid fractures are caused by indirect force: A report of four cases

Ideberg type III glenoid fractures are relatively rare, and the mechanisms of injury and treatment strategies remain controversial. We reviewed the fracture patterns and final radiological findings in four cases. All fractures were wider on the medial side than on the side of the articular surface. All patients had multiple ipsilateral rib fractures; three out of four patients had a concomitant acromion fracture. Therefore, the mechanism of injury for the fracture is assumed to be external force applied in the caudal direction to the medial side of the body of the scapula. The superior shoulder suspensory complex was disrupted in most cases. A good clinical outcome was obtained in two patients with percutaneous screw fixation for the glenoid fracture and rigid plate fixation for the acromion fracture and in one patient who did not have an acromion fracture. However, one patient who did not undergo fixation of the acromion fracture developed osteoarthrosis of the shoulder joint. In this type of fracture, it is important to stabilize the acromion fracture at the same time as fixation of the glenoid fracture.

Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Glenoid Rim Fractures After First-Time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Study with 9-Year Follow-up

Primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations can be associated with displaced anterior glenoid rim fractures. Nonoperative treatment of such fractures has been shown to have excellent results in a small cohort of patients; as such, we have been treating these fractures nonoperatively, regardless of fragment size and degree of displacement, provided that post-reduction computed tomography scans revealed an anteroposteriorly centered humeral head. The aim of this study was to analyze the medium- to long-term results of nonoperative treatment of displaced anterior glenoid rim fractures, assessing in particular the residual instability and development of osteoarthritis.

METHODS

In a 2-center study, 30 patients with a mean age of 48 years (range, 29 to 67 years) were evaluated clinically with use of the Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, as well as radiographically with use of radiographs and computed tomography scans at a mean follow-up of 9 years (range, 5 to 14 years).

RESULTS

Fracture-healing was documented in all patients. Seven patients (23%) had post-fracture onset of osteoarthritis (5 with Samilson grade I and 2 with Samilson grade IV). Of these, 1 patient had recurrent instability that was successfully treated with hemiarthroplasty 9 years after the index injury (relative Constant score, 101%), and was excluded from further analysis. No other patient had a recurrent redislocation, subluxation, or positive apprehension. The other 6 patients with new-onset radiographic osteoarthritis were pain-free (mean Constant score pain scale, 15 points) with good shoulder function (relative Constant score, 84% to 108%). A total of 26 patients (90%) rated their functional outcome as good or very good, and 3 patients (10%) rated it as fair. The mean relative Constant score was 97% (range, 61% to 108%), the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 92 points (range, 56 to 100 points), and the mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index score was 126 points (range, 0 to 660 points). All patients returned to full-time work.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative treatment of anterior glenoid rim fractures following primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation results in excellent clinical outcomes with a very low rate of residual instability and, thus, treatment failure. Asymptomatic radiographic osteoarthritis occurred in roughly 1 of 4 patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Superior approach for treating Ideberg III glenoid fractures with superior shoulder suspensory complex injury: A technical trick

Ideberg III glenoid fractures are rare and difficult in treating among shoulder fractures. With the development of research, a series of surgical approaches and methods were performed, such as anterior approach, traditional Judet approach, modified Judet approach, combined approach, acromion approach and so on. While these approaches still have some limitations in treatment of Ideberg III glenoid fractures with superior shoulder suspensory complex(SSSC) injury, for extensive soft tissue dissection, unsatisfactory exposure, difficult surgical intervention. In our case with Ideberg III glenoid fracture with acromioclavicular dislocation, superior approach was adopted during treatment of the scapula glenoid fracture and coracoclavicular ligament rupture perfectly. The result was satisfactory in accordance with 92 points by Constant-Murley score. We believe that individualized therapy should depend on the injury types, and superior approach would be a new valuable method for Ideberg III glenoid fractures with SSSC injury.