The distribution of hand fractures at the university hospital of north Norway

HOW TO PREVENT HAND INJURIES - REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA IS THE FIRST STEP IN HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT

BACKGROUND

Hand injuries are common affecting all ages, genders, and geographic regions. They can result in long term disability and mortality, while they place a significant financial burden in society. Although, hand injuries can be prevented. Preventive strategies can be designed, but knowledge of injuries' epidemiological characteristics is required beforehand.

METHODS

We performed a review of the current literature related to hand injuries to identify their incidence, patients' demographics, type, mode, and time of the injury.

RESULTS

Hand injuries constitute 6.6% to 28.6% of all injuries presenting to the Emergency Department and 28% of injuries to the musculoskeletal system. They mainly affect young male labourers. Occupational and home accidents are the commonest injury modalities, while traffic road accidents constitute a significant reason for hand injuries as well. Lacerations account for most hand injuries, followed by crush injuries, fractures and amputations. Most occupational injuries occur in the beginning of the week and especially during the morning shift, while there has been identified an increase in the number of hand injuries during the summer months.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand injuries are an important health problem with impact on patient's life and on the society. Although they can be prevented. Preventive strategies need to be addressed towards many directions and people's activities, since prevention will have an important impact on people's quality of life and society's well-being.

Comparison of Pain Catastrophic Scale and Anxiety in Patients With Boxer's Fracture and Other Types of Hand Fractures

OBJECTIVE

 The Pain Catastrophic Scale (PCS) is generally associated with high and low post-recovery satisfaction and measures the pain perception of patients in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the association of deliberate (as in a fight or anger causing punching a wall) boxer's fractures with catastrophic pain compared to accidental (as in a fall, accidental knocking it against a wall, etc.) fractures and evaluate the effect of anxiety about fracture union and functional recovery on clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A total of 62 male patients with metacarpal fractures, 31 as a result of deliberate punching (1st group) and 31 with metacarpal fractures as a result of an accident (2nd group), who applied to the emergency department or orthopedic clinic with the diagnosis of metacarpal fracture between January 2021 and October 2022, were included in the study. All patients were selected from patients who were followed up with conservative plaster/splint. The PCS scores of the patients were evaluated comparatively with the clinical results measured after at least six weeks.

RESULTS

 The mean age of the patients was 30.8 (18-50) in the 1st group and 34.8 (18-64) in the 2nd Group, and no statistically significant difference was found (p=0.274). While the median PCS score was 10.5 (interquartile range {IQR}: 12.3) for the 1st group, the median PCS score was 17.5 (IQR: 14.5) for the 2nd group, and the PCS score was statistically significantly lower in group 1 (p=0.009). While the median Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) value was 0 (IQR: 0.3) for the 1st group, the median VAS value was 1 (IQR: 2.0) for the 2nd group, and the VAS score was statistically significantly lower in the 1st group (p<0.001). While the median 'quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand' (Q-DASH) value was 0 (IQR:2.3) for the 1st group, the median Q-DASH value was 3.4 (IQR:6.3) for the 2nd group, and the Q-DASH score was statistically significantly lower in the 1st group (p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between the 1st and 2nd groups in terms of grip strength values (p=0.815).

CONCLUSION

The etiology of patients presenting with a boxer's fracture should be well understood, and if necessary, these patients should be treated multidisciplinary, with psychiatric help. Better satisfaction can be achieved with lower results in patients whose PCS scoring system has lost its eigenvalue.

Biophysical Stimulation in Delayed Fracture Healing of Hand Phalanx: A Radiographic Evaluation

Phalangeal fractures are common events among the upper limbs accounting for 10% of all human body fractures. Fracture complete healing process may persevere several months or years. Most phalangeal fractures present favorable union within 3 to 6 weeks. In the literature, biophysical stimulation has yielded favorable outcomes in the treatment of hand fractures. A survey involving hospitals in the US reported the use of biophysical stimulation (72%) in relation to nonhealing fractures at three months after trauma. A noninvasive procedure such as biophysical stimulation may be preferential prior to consideration of invasive procedures. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 80 phalangeal fractures, 43 of which did not show any radiographic sign of healing 30 days after surgery; on radiograms, we calculated radiographic data and the total active motion (TAM) for clinical comparison. All radiographic images were evaluated using Adobe Photoshop CS3 (version 10.0, Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). We calculated the index of relative bone healing each month after surgery starting from 30 days, which was considered as T1, and followed up for a total of 6 months after stimulation (T6) with better results in stimulated groups. We concluded that prompt administration of biophysical stimulation supports fracture healing and yields an important improvement in the union rate compared with nontreatment. Above all, our patients experienced less injury-related distress between the fracture and repair period, which consequently reduced immobilization time, envisaging an early rehabilitation interval, with a better patient hand outcome.

Epidemiology and Fracture Patterns of Traumatic Phalangeal Fractures

Background:

Despite the relatively high incidence of phalangeal fractures, there is an imperfect understanding of the epidemiology and anatomical distribution of these fractures. This study describes the patient characteristics, anatomic distribution, and detailed fracture patterns of phalangeal fractures among a large adult cohort in the United States.

Methods:

A retrospective study was performed among patients with phalangeal fractures in the United States between January 2010 and January 2015. Included patients were 18 years old or older and had a diagnosis of a phalangeal fracture. A total of 2140 phalangeal fractures in 1747 patients were included, and a manual chart review was performed to collect epidemiological and radiographic information. Fractures were classified based on location and fracture pattern.

Results:

The median age at the time of injury was 45 years (interquartile range, 30–57), and 65% of patients were men. The small finger had the highest incidence of fractures (26%) followed by the ring finger (24%). Distal and proximal phalanges demonstrated the highest incidence of fractures at 39% each. The dominant hand was affected in 44% of cases. Eighteen percent of fractures were due to a work-related trauma mechanism, and the most common mechanism of injury was blunt trauma (46%).

Conclusion:

This study provides a detailed overview of the anatomic distribution and fracture patterns of phalangeal fractures in an adult US population and, thus, may aid hand surgeons treating these injuries.

Fractures of the base of the proximal phalanx in children: comparison between cast immobilization and Kirschner wire fixation

To retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of fractures of the base of the proximal phalanx (FBPP) in children by closed reduction and cast immobilization (CRCI) and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). Thirty-four consecutive children with FBPP were treated by CRCI (group A) and CRPP (group B). The diaphyseal axis-metacarpal head angle (DHA) was measured in anteroposterior radiographs before and after treatment. At the last follow-up visit, the range of motion of the injured finger was evaluated by the Total Active Flexion Scale. One year and more after the index procedure, patients were asked to answer the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Fifteen patients (44.1%) were in group A and 19 (55.9%) in group B. groups A and B did not differ significantly in their demographics and preoperative DHA (P > 0.05). However, the postoperative DHA improved significantly after treatment, whether group A (P < 0.001) or group B (P < 0.001). And nonoperative treatment yielded a better DHA than surgical treatment (P = 0.01). Overall, five in group A (20%) and two in group B (37%) (P = 0.06) developed a complication. The mean MHQ score was 97.2 ± 5.3 (range, 78.1-100) and 99.3 ± 2.0 (range, 92.8-100) in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.15). Children with isolated, displaced FBPP treated conservatively can achieve similar clinical and radiological outcomes, and lower complication rates, compared to patients managed surgically; however, fracture more severely displaced initially may have higher rates of complications after surgical fixation. If conservative treatment fails, surgery is recommended.

The "Trigonometric Technique" for simple measurement of volar angulation in boxers' fractures

INTRODUCTION

Subcapital fractures of the 5th metacarpal bone (MCV) represent a common injury. Volar angulation measurement is essential for treatment decision-making and therefore needs a reliable and valid method. The purpose of the present study was to investigate a new technique for volar angulation measurement, called the "Trigonometric Technique" (TT), and to compare the TT with the reference standard based on computed tomography (CT).

HYPOTHESIS

Quantifying volar angulation in MCV neck fractures with the TT shows no difference compared to the angle measured on CT scans.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen patients (14 men and 1 woman) with a mean age of 37±16years (range, from 16 to 72 years) who suffered MCV neck fracture and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for this prospective cohort study. Radiologic investigation included simple dorsopalmar (DP) radiographs and CT scans from the injured hand. Volar angulation measurements were performed by three observers at two time points comparing the TT to measurements obtained on CT scans. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined to assess inter- and intra-observer reliability.

RESULTS

The TT showed a mean volar angulation of 39±5 degrees (range, from 26 to 46 degrees) compared to 41±7 degrees (range, from 28 to 54 degrees) on CT measurement, which revealed a significant correlation between the two measurement techniques (R=0.922, p<0.001). Overall, the inter-rater (R=0.977; 95% CI 0.945-0.992) as well as intra-rater (R=0.857; 95% CI 0.739-0.941) reliability for the volar angulation using the TT was excellent.

CONCLUSION

The TT presented in this study uses plain radiography and trigonometric identities to precisely determine volar angulation in MCV neck fractures. The TT correlates excellently with the obtained volar angulation angles measured on CT scans. We recommend the TT for volar angulation measurement in boxer's fracture as a reliable alternative to the conventional techniques. However, rotational abnormalities may remain undetected and should therefore be ruled out during clinical examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, study of diagnostic test.

The Effect of Age on Fracture Healing Time in Metacarpal Fractures

Background: Older patients are treated for fracture with increasing frequency. Although studies on animals suggest that older mice and rats heal fractures more slowly, the clinical implications remain unclear. A better understanding of differences in healing with age can help customize fracture treatment. Our purpose was to retrospectively evaluate metacarpal fractures for healing time looking specifically at age-related differences. Methods: A retrospective review of patients treated for metacarpal fractures was conducted. Patients with incomplete charts or inadequate follow-up were excluded. One hundred ninety-eight charts were analyzed. Demographic and other patient factors were documented. Fracture characteristics and treatment type were documented. Fracture healing was determined clinically. Plain radiographs and examination were used in decision making. Results: Age was not associated with fracture healing time as a continuous variable (P = .09). Patients above 75 years were not associated with increased healing time (P = .58). Fracture characteristics were related to healing time: minimally displaced and comminuted fractures healed faster than oblique fractures, spiral fractures, or transverse fractures (P = .048). Patients undergoing surgery healed faster than those without surgery (P = .046). Renal failure negatively affected fracture healing time (P = .03). Diabetes, hypothyroidism, and gender were not associated with healing time. Complications were not associated with age or other patient or fracture-related factors. Conclusions: Age does not affect clinical fracture healing time in adult. Therefore, older patients do not require disparate treatment. Other fracture-related factors and considerations such as functional demand and support systems might influence treatment decisions in fracture care.

Fractures and dislocations of the hand in polytrauma patients: Incidence, injury pattern and functional outcome

INTRODUCTION

Injuries of the hand can cause significant functional impairment, diminished quality of life and delayed return to work. However, the incidence and functional outcome of hand injuries in polytrauma patients is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, distribution and functional outcome of fractures and dislocation of the hand in polytrauma patients.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective cohort study was performed at a level 1 trauma centre. Polytrauma was defined as patients with an Injury Severity Score of 16 or higher. Fractures and dislocations to the hand were determined. All eligible polytrauma patients with hand injuries were included and a Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QDASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) were administered. Patients were contacted 1-6 years after trauma.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 2046 polytrauma patients 72 patients (3.5%) suffered a hand injury. The functional outcome scores of 52 patients (72%) were obtained. The Metacarpal (48%) and carpal (33%) bones were the most frequently affected. The median QDASH score for all patients with hand injury was 17 (IQR 0-31) and the PRWHE 14 (IQR 0-41). Patients with a concomitant upper extremity injury (p=0.002 for PRWHE, p0.006 for QDASH) and those with higher ISS scores (p=0.034 for PRWHE, QDASH not significant) had worse functional outcome scores. As an example, of the 5 patients with the worst outcome scores 3 suffered an isolated phalangeal injury, all had concomitant upper extremity injury or neurological injuries (3 plexus injuries, 1 severe brain injury).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of hand injuries in polytrauma patients is 3.5%, which is relatively low compared to a general trauma population. Metacarpal and carpal bones were most frequently affected. The functional extremity specific outcome scores are highly influenced by concomitant injuries (upper extremity injuries, neurological injuries and higher ISS).