The development of a neuropathic ankle following successful correction of non-plantigrade charcot foot deformity

Coronal Hindfoot Alignment in Midfoot Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Coronal plane hindfoot malalignment produces abnormal compensatory forces within the midfoot and forefoot. The primary aim of this study is to compare radiographic hindfoot alignment in patients with a midfoot Charcot event, and identify patterns associated with breakdown. A retrospective review of 43 patients (48 limbs) with midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy were compared between the coronal hindfoot alignments and Charcot joint involvement. Coronal hindfoot alignment was classified as neutral (n = 15), valgus (n = 16), and varus (n = 17) utilizing the Saltzman hindfoot alignment radiograph. Charcot joint breakdown was classified as isolated tarsometatarsal joint (n = 8), combination of tarsometatarsal and naviculocuneiform joints (n = 22), and midtarsal joints including talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints (n = 18). Patients exhibiting varus hindfoot alignment had 5.8 times greater risk of breakdown at the tarsometatarsal and naviculocuneiform joints (odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 1.7-22.9, p < .01). Hindfoot varus induces external rotation of the talus, resulting in compensation through the naviculocuneiform and tarsometatarsal joint, which correlates with our findings of a 6-fold increase in naviculocuneiform and tarsometatarsal joint collapse. Patients exhibiting valgus hindfoot alignment had 27 times greater risk of breakdown at the midtarsal joint (odds ratio 27.0; 95% confidence interval 5.6-207.0, p < .01). Hindfoot valgus induces internal rotation of the talonavicular joint, which correlates with our findings of a 27-fold increase in midtarsal joint breakdown. Varus and valgus hindfoot alignment are associated with different midfoot injury patterns, which may have implications in surgical management and allow for focused surveillance in neuropathic patients presenting with early-stage clinical findings consistent with Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Charcot foot reconstruction outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a complex condition characterised by progressive deformity, limited treatment options and a high amputation rate. Surgical reconstruction of Charcot foot has been proposed as a method to preserve the foot. However, limited information exists on the different methods of reconstruction available, their outcomes and complications.

METHODS

We systematically analysed published data from Jan 1993 to Dec 2018 to assess methods of fixation and associated outcomes for the surgical reconstruction in Charcot neuroarthropathy. Statistical analyses were undertaken to determine the amputation rates, return to ambulation and complications associated with these techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 1116 feet (1089 patients) were reported to have undergone reconstruction with significant heterogeneity in patient selection. Of these, 726 (65%) were reported to undergo internal fixation, 346 feet (31%) external fixation and 44 (4%) undergoing simultaneous internal and external fixation. No single technique demonstrated a significant benefit over the other. Overall, the bone fusion rate was 86.1%. Complications directly attributable to the technique employed were noted in 36% of individuals. The reported post-reconstruction amputation rate was only 5.5% with 91% apparently returning to ambulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no preferential method of fixation was identified, we find that the current options for surgical reconstruction could offer limb salvage with a low amputation risk in a highly selected population. However, the lack of controlled studies, inconsistent reporting of outcomes and heterogeneity of patient selection mean that the quality of evidence is low.

Charcot Neuroarthropathy in Patients With Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review of Surgical Management

Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) of the foot and ankle is a demanding clinical dilemma, and surgical management can be very complicated. Historically, the evidence guiding surgical management of CN has been small retrospective case series and expert opinions. The purpose of the present report was to provide a systematic review of studies published from 2009 to 2014 and to review the indications for surgery. A Medline search was performed, and a systematic review of studies discussing the surgical management of CN was undertaken. Thirty reports fit the inclusion criteria for our study, including 860 patients who had undergone a surgical procedure for the treatment of CN. The surgical procedures included amputation, arthrodesis, debridement of ulcers, drainage of infections, and exostectomy. The midfoot was addressed in 26.9% of cases, the hindfoot in 41.6%, and the ankle in 38.4%. Of the 30 studies, 24 were retrospective case series (level 4), 4 were controlled retrospective studies (level 3), and 2 were level II studies. The overall amputation rate was 8.9%. The quality of the published data on the surgical management of CN has improved during the past several years. Evidence concerning the timing of treatment and the use of different fixation methods remains inconclusive.

Midtarsal Reconstructive Arthrodesis Using a Multi-Axial Correction Fixator in Charcot Midfoot Arthropathy

Reconstructive surgeries for Charcot foot are challenging due to complicated conditions and comorbidities including poor bone quality, sensory abnormalities, poor vascularity, and immunity impairment. Although various fixation devices, including screws, plates, and external fixators, have been used in the surgical reconstruction of the Charcot midfoot, all of these devices are associated with some disadvantages. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of the Multi-Axial Correction (MAC) monolateral external fixation system for the reconstructive surgery of midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy. A total of 11 feet with midfoot Charcot arthropathy were treated surgically using the MAC fixation system solely or accompanied with minimal internal fixation. The mean postoperative follow-up was 29 (range = 12-44) months. The mean postoperative timing of the MAC system removal was 8.7 (range = 5-14) weeks. No pin tract infections were observed. All patients went on to successful union and correction of a rocker bottom deformity. No cases resulted in limb amputation. All patients were able to ambulate with custom diabetic shoes and insoles in 9 patients (10 feet) and commercially available shoes in 1 patient (1 foot). This study suggests that the MAC system can be an acceptable, easy option for the surgical treatment of midfoot Charcot arthropathy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV: Case series.