1
|
Răducan-Florea IV, Leaşu FG, Dinu EA, Rogozea LM. The Nocebo Effect: A Bias in Clinical Practice-An Ethical Approach. Am J Ther 2024:00045391-990000000-00183. [PMID: 38557480 DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000001730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nocebo effect is often disregarded in medical practice and is certainly much less known than the placebo effect, although, in reality, both can influence therapeutic decision making and the quality of life of patients. However, the nocebo effect raises a number of issues not only of a practical nature related to clinical activity but also ethical dilemmas related to the observance of the patient's autonomy, nonmaleficence, or informed consent and the information on which it is based. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY The ethical dilemmas raised by the nocebo effect revolve around how informed consent can be achieved, the accuracy and volume of information that is transmitted to the patient, and how to report negative side effects of therapeutic treatment. DATA SOURCES In September 2023, a narrative analysis of the literature was conducted using a combination of keywords such as nocebo, placebo, ethics, therapeutic relationship from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and so on, as well as from official documents developed at an international level (World Health Organization), for a period of 10 years (2012-2021). RESULTS Analyzing the articles that remarked upon the significant impact of ethics in nocebo research or in the therapeutic relationship, we can state that the existence of several relevant issues of interest have been detected regarding the ethical use of nocebo and its impact in research or in clinics and thus the need for proper knowledge and management of the impact of nocebo effects. The ethical paradox of obtaining informed consent with the 2 goals, first, the need for complete information and second, the preservation of the autonomy of the patient, respectively, that of "primum non-nocere" and of avoiding unnecessary harm by revealing probable adverse effects is a point of interest for numerous studies. The potential for a nocebo effect is present when we inform patients about the risks and benefits of treatment, there being a clear link between the moral and ethical duty to inform patients and the need to avoid situations that increase the nocebo impact on how the disease or the adverse effects of the treatment are perceived. Adapting information about the side effects of medicines should focus on ensuring a balance between transparency and caution, especially in patients with a high potential for nocebo effect. CONCLUSIONS The nocebo effect had for a long time been unknown or denied, although it can interfere with the results of the treatment used. As the nocebo phenomenon becomes increasingly known in medical practice, the clinical and ethical implications are identified by medical staff, and nocebo's adverse responses are no longer ignored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Florin G Leaşu
- Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences Department, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Eleonora A Dinu
- Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences Department, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Liliana M Rogozea
- Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences Department, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tapering biologics in axial spondyloarthritis: A systematic literature review. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 112:109256. [PMID: 36150228 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The emergence of biologics has improved the management of patients with rheumatic disease, mainly with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Sustained remission has become a reachable goal thanks to the treat to target strategy. Contrary to rheumatoid arthritis, data on biologic optimization among SpA patients in remission is scarce and still a subject of debate. The main objective of this systematic review was to provide the most up-to-date published literature regarding biologic tapering in axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews guidelines. Original articles from Pubmed and Scopus, published until December 20th 2021, and tackling tapering strategies of the biologics in patients with axial SpA were included RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. They were published between 2008 and 2020. The most studied molecules were Etanercept (ETN) (n = 13), Infliximab (IFX) (n = 6), Adalimumab (ADA) (n = 5), certolizumab pegol (CZP) (n = 2), Golimumab (n = 1) and ETN biosimilar. There are no studies published regarding anti-IL 17 tapering strategy. Patient-tailored dose reduction of anti TNF-α agents was successful in preserving stable low disease activity in most of the studies with remission rates ranging between 20.2 % and 93.7 %. Complete treatment discontinuation is associated with a high risk of flares. CONCLUSION To conclude, published data indicate that a progressive tapering strategy for anti TNF-α therapy is successful among axial SpA in sustained remission. However, further studies with more homogenized tapering strategies are needed in order to ascertain the specific implication of each subset for a better holistic approach.
Collapse
|
3
|
van Adrichem RCS, Voorneveld HJE, Waverijn GJ, Kok MR, Bisoendial RJ. The Non-medical Switch from Reference Adalimumab to Biosimilar Adalimumab is Highly Successful in a Large Cohort of Patients with Stable Inflammatory Rheumatic Joint Diseases: A Real-Life Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther 2022; 9:1109-1118. [PMID: 35655028 PMCID: PMC9314483 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00465-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The adalimumab biosimilar (ADAbio) Amgevita® has a similar efficacy and safety profile as the adalimumab reference (ADA) Humira®. We studied the clinical consequences of a non-medical switch from ADA to ADAbio in adult patients with mainly established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods Patients that received treatment with ADA for at least three months were switched to ADAbio. Data was collected retrospectively from 1 year before the switch up to 6 months after. Results A total of 603 patients were switched from ADA to ADAbio (switch group). During a 1-year follow-up, over 93% of all patients underwent a successful transition in terms of disease activity and safety from ADA to biosimilar, supporting the bioequivalence of both drugs in patients with stable inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases. Forty patients (6.6%) switched back to ADA (re-switch group). There were no objective changes in disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), or adverse effects before and after the switch between both groups. Conclusions In line with earlier reports, the transition to ADAbio went successful in the majority of patients with stable inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases. Patient-reported symptoms without objective signs that indicate a flare of disease activity after the switch to ADAbio are probably explained by nocebo effects. A pre-emptive approach to counteract nocebo effects and stimulate placebo response may have a positive impact on health outcomes for patients and preserve the economic benefits of cost savings that can be achieved by prescribing a biosimilar instead of the reference drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne C S van Adrichem
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke J E Voorneveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geeke J Waverijn
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc R Kok
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Radjesh J Bisoendial
- Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The second decade of anti-TNF-a therapy in clinical practice: new lessons and future directions in the COVID-19 era. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:1493-1511. [PMID: 35503130 PMCID: PMC9063259 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05136-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Since the late 1990s, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (anti-TNFs) have revolutionized the therapy of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) affecting the gut, joints, skin and eyes. Although the therapeutic armamentarium in IMIDs is being constantly expanded, anti-TNFs remain the cornerstone of their treatment. During the second decade of their application in clinical practice, a large body of additional knowledge has accumulated regarding various aspects of anti-TNF-α therapy, whereas new indications have been added. Recent experimental studies have shown that anti-TNFs exert their beneficial effects not only by restoring aberrant TNF-mediated immune mechanisms, but also by de-activating pathogenic fibroblast-like mesenchymal cells. Real-world data on millions of patients further confirmed the remarkable efficacy of anti-TNFs. It is now clear that anti-TNFs alter the physical course of inflammatory arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, leading to inhibition of local and systemic bone loss and to a decline in the number of surgeries for disease-related complications, while anti-TNFs improve morbidity and mortality, acting beneficially also on cardiovascular comorbidities. On the other hand, no new safety signals emerged, whereas anti-TNF-α safety in pregnancy and amid the COVID-19 pandemic was confirmed. The use of biosimilars was associated with cost reductions making anti-TNFs more widely available. Moreover, the current implementation of the “treat-to-target” approach and treatment de-escalation strategies of IMIDs were based on anti-TNFs. An intensive search to discover biomarkers to optimize response to anti-TNF-α treatment is currently ongoing. Finally, selective targeting of TNF-α receptors, new forms of anti-TNFs and combinations with other agents, are being tested in clinical trials and will probably expand the spectrum of TNF-α inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for IMIDs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gisbert JP, Gaffney K, Young D, Ebbers HC, Girolomoni G. Current evidence on the use of the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (Imraldi TM): a multidisciplinary perspective. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021; 22:109-121. [PMID: 34918591 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2012146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review provides an overview of data from trials and real-world studies available for SB5 (ImraldiTM) across three main therapeutic areas: rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology. AREAS COVERED A literature search for publications on data for SB5 efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity was undertaken. EXPERT OPINION Evidence derived from clinical studies suggest that the biosimilar SB5 is a safe and effective alternative to reference adalimumab. Considering that patients suffering from immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis often require long-term biologic treatment, biosimilar medicines (such as SB5) can reduce healthcare costs while increasing access to effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Karl Gaffney
- Rheumatology Department, Norfolk and Norwich Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - David Young
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Giampiero Girolomoni
- Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Levivien C, Bottois C, Lopez-Medina C, Dumas S, Hubert J, Belo S, Roux C, Conort O, Dougados M. Impact of a clinical pharmacist in a multidisciplinary consultation on the switch to a biosimilar for inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Joint Bone Spine 2021; 89:105322. [PMID: 34896303 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite several studies proving the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with original drugs, switching to a biosimilar remains challenging when the decision is at the discretion of physicians with mandatory consent from patients. Educating patients about biosimilars seems important to increase the prescription rate of biosimilars. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist consultation on the switch to and retention rate of a biosimilar for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. METHODS This retrospective study compared 2 groups of adult patients receiving (intervention) or not (control) a consultation with a pharmacist right before the rheumatologist consultation. The primary outcome was the frequency of patients who switched to a biosimilar at the end of the rheumatologist visit. RESULTS We analysed 141 patients (50% women, 50±15 years old, on original adalimumab (62%) or etanercept (38%)) who had never used biosimilars: 85 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group. The switch rate to a biosimilar significantly differed between the groups: 69.4% versus 41.1% in the intervention group versus the control group respectively (p<0.01). After a 1-year follow-up period, 72.5% versus 81.3% of patients who switched were still on biosimilar in the intervention versus control group respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the positive impact of a pharmacist consultation before the physician's one on switching to a biosimilar, but more studies are needed to assess the impact of this pharmacist consultation on preventing the nocebo effect and therefore on improving the retention rate of biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Levivien
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
| | - Cécile Bottois
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Clementina Lopez-Medina
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Rhumatologie - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; Rheumatology Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Sophie Dumas
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Julien Hubert
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Sephora Belo
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Christian Roux
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Rhumatologie - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; INSERM (U1153): Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, PRESS Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Ornella Conort
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Rhumatologie - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; INSERM (U1153): Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, PRESS Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mitsikostas DD, Aravantinou-Fatorou K, Deligianni C, Kravvariti E, Korompoki E, Mylona M, Vryttia P, Papagiannopoulou G, Delicha EM, Dellis A, Tsivgoulis G, Dimopoulos MA, Amanzio M, Sfikakis PP. Nocebo-Prone Behavior Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Hesitancy in Healthcare Workers. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9101179. [PMID: 34696287 PMCID: PMC8541064 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9101179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Among healthcare workers (HCWs), SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy may be linked to a higher susceptibility to nocebo effects, i.e., adverse events (AEs) experienced after medical treatments due to negative expectations. To investigate this hypothesis a cross-sectional survey was performed with a self-completed questionnaire that included a tool (Q-No) for the identification of nocebo-prone individuals. A total of 1309 HCWs (67.2% women; 43.4% physicians; 28.4% nurses; 11.5% administrative staff; 16.6% other personnel) completed the questionnaires, among whom 237 (18.1%) had declined vaccination. Q-No scores were ≥15 in 325 participants (24.8%) suggesting nocebo-prone behavior. In a multivariate logistic regression model with Q-No score, age, gender, and occupation as independent variables, estimated odds ratios (ORs) of vaccination were 0.43 (i.e., less likely, p < 0.001) in participants with Q-No score ≥ 15 vs. Q-No score < 15, 0.58 in females vs. males (p = 0.013), and 4.7 (i.e., more likely) in physicians vs. other HCWs (p < 0.001), independent of age, which was not significantly associated with OR of vaccination. At least one adverse effect (AE) was reported by 67.5% of vaccinees, mostly local pain and flu-like symptoms. In a multivariate logistic regression model, with Q-No score, age, gender, and occupation as independent variables, estimated ORs of AE reporting were 2.0 in females vs. males (p < 0.001) and 1.47 in physicians vs. other HCWs (p = 0.017) independently of age and Q-No score, which were not significantly associated with OR of AE. These findings suggest that nocebo-prone behavior in HCWs is associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination hesitancy indicating a potential benefit of a campaign focused on nocebo-prone people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimos D. Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
- Correspondence: ; Tel./Fax: +30-2107289282
| | - Konstantina Aravantinou-Fatorou
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Christina Deligianni
- Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, 2600 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Evrydiki Kravvariti
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, Laikon General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (M.M.); (P.P.S.)
| | - Eleni Korompoki
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (P.V.); (M.A.D.)
| | - Maria Mylona
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, Laikon General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (M.M.); (P.P.S.)
| | - Pinelopi Vryttia
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (P.V.); (M.A.D.)
| | - Georgia Papagiannopoulou
- 2nd Neurology Department, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (G.T.)
| | | | - Athanasios Dellis
- 2nd Surgery Department, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Georgios Tsivgoulis
- 2nd Neurology Department, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (G.T.)
| | - Meletios A. Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (P.V.); (M.A.D.)
| | - Martina Amanzio
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124 Turin, Italy;
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, Laikon General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (M.M.); (P.P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fragoulis GE, Evangelatos G, Arida A, Bournia VK, Fragiadaki K, Karamanakos A, Kravvariti E, Laskari K, Panopoulos S, Pappa M, Mitsikostas DD, Tektonidou MG, Sfikakis PP. Nocebo-Prone Behaviour in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2020; 31:288-294. [PMID: 33196007 PMCID: PMC7656135 DOI: 10.31138/mjr.31.3.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with emotional distress and significant disruptions in health-care services. These are key players in the development of nocebo phenomena. We aimed to investigate nocebo-prone behaviour in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) amid the COVID-19 pandemic-associated lockdown. METHODS Consecutive patients were telephone-interviewed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. Clinical and socioeconomic characteristics (eg, level of education) were recorded. For nocebo behaviour, a four-item validated questionnaire (Q-No, cut-off score>15), was used. Results were compared with pre-COVID-19 Q-No scores collected from patients followed-up in our department. RESULTS Nocebo behaviour was detected in 51/500 (10.2%) individuals. In patients with nocebo behaviour, use of anti-hypertensives was less common (17.6% vs 31.8%, p=0.04), but a higher level of education was more common (58.8% vs 35.9%, p=0.002), compared with patients with Q-No score ≤15; the latter retained statistical significance in multivariate regression analysis (p=0.009, OR [95%CI]: 2.29, [1.23-4.25]). Total Q-No scores were higher in the COVID-19-period compared to the pre-COVID-19 era [median (range); 12 (4-20) vs 11 (4-20), p=0.02]. Among 78 patients with available Q-No questionnaires in the pre-COVID-19 era, 11 (14.1%) displayed nocebo behaviour, which increased to 16 (20.5%) amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Interim development of nocebo behaviour was also associated with higher educational level (p=0.049, OR: 3.65, 95%CI: 1.005-13.268). CONCLUSION A considerable proportion of ARD patients manifested nocebo-prone behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was more common among those with high educational level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George E. Fragoulis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Evangelatos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Arida
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki-Kalliopi Bournia
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Kalliopi Fragiadaki
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasios Karamanakos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Evrydiki Kravvariti
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Katerina Laskari
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stylianos Panopoulos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Pappa
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimos D. Mitsikostas
- First Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria G. Tektonidou
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|