Perioperative genomic profiles using structure-specific oligonucleotide probes

Pilot Findings of Pharmacogenomics in Perioperative Care: Initial Results From the First Phase of the ImPreSS Trial

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenomics, which offers a potential means by which to inform prescribing and avoid adverse drug reactions, has gained increasing consideration in other medical settings but has not been broadly evaluated during perioperative care.

METHODS

The Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Decision Support in Surgery (ImPreSS) Trial is a prospective, single-center study consisting of a prerandomization pilot and a subsequent randomized phase. We describe findings from the pilot period. Patients planning elective surgeries were genotyped with pharmacogenomic results, and decision support was made available to anesthesia providers in advance of surgery. Pharmacogenomic result access and prescribing records were analyzed. Surveys (Likert-scale) were administered to providers to understand utilization barriers.

RESULTS

Of eligible anesthesiology providers, 166 of 211 (79%) enrolled. A total of 71 patients underwent genotyping and surgery (median, 62 years; 55% female; average American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, 2.6; 58 inpatients and 13 ambulatories). No patients required postoperative intensive care or pain consultations. At least 1 provider accessed pharmacogenomic results before or during 41 of 71 surgeries (58%). Faculty were more likely to access results (78%) compared to house staff (41%; P = .003) and midlevel practitioners (15%) ( P < .0001). Notably, all administered intraoperative medications had favorable genomic results with the exception of succinylcholine administration to 1 patient with genomically increased risk for prolonged apnea (without adverse outcome). Considering composite prescribing in preoperative, recovery, throughout hospitalization, and at discharge, each patient was prescribed a median of 35 (range 15-83) total medications, 7 (range 1-22) of which had annotated pharmacogenomic results. Of 2371 prescribing events, 5 genomically high-risk medications were administered (all tramadol or omeprazole; with 2 of 5 pharmacogenomic results accessed), and 100 genomically cautionary mediations were administered (hydralazine, oxycodone, and pantoprazole; 61% rate of accessing results). Providers reported that although results were generally easy to access and understand, the most common reason for not considering results was because remembering to access pharmacogenomic information was not yet a part of their normal clinical workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot data for result access rates suggest interest in pharmacogenomics by anesthesia providers, even if opportunities to alter prescribing in response to high-risk genotypes were infrequent. This pilot phase has also uncovered unique considerations for implementing pharmacogenomic information in the perioperative care setting, and new strategies including adding the involvement of surgery teams, targeting patients likely to need intensive care and dedicated pain care, and embedding pharmacists within rounding models will be incorporated in the follow-on randomized phase to increase engagement and likelihood of affecting prescribing decisions and clinical outcomes.

Development of a Polymerase Chain Reaction/Ligase Detection Reaction Assay for Detection of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms

AIMS

Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotypes are associated with differential drug metabolism. The aim of this study was to establish a reliable assay for CYP2C19 genotyping based on a polymerase chain reaction/ligase detection reaction (PCR-LDR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specific primers and probes were designed to detect CYP2C19*1, *2, *3, and *17. A control for each allele was prepared and used for performance evaluation. A total of 200 clinical samples were analyzed using the PCR-LDR assay and Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

The detection limit of the PCR-LDR assay was 2 ng/μL of genomic DNA. Common interfering substances in the blood did not affect the results of the detection. For the clinical samples, the results of the PCR-LDR and the Sanger sequencing were identical. Among the 200 patients, 104 (52%) were wild type (*1/*1), 64 (32%) were *1/*2, 16 (8%) were *1/*3, 8 (4%) were *2/*2, 7 (3.5%) were *2/*3, and 1 (0.5%) was *1/*7. No *3/*3 genotype was detected in these patients.

CONCLUSION

This PCR-LDR assay is reliable for the detection of CYP2C19 genotypes in a clinical setting. It will be a useful tool to screen for CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles in patients before clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor treatment.

Detection of cytochrome P450 2C19 gene polymorphism from noninvasive samples by cycling probe technology

Background

The proportion of poor metabolizers (PMs) of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 is much higher in the Japanese population than in European populations. Cycling probe technology (CPT) is a simple signal amplification technique for targeting specific DNA sequences. CPT utilizes a chimeric DNA-RNA-DNA probe that is cleaved by the enzyme ribonuclease (RNase H). In this study, using CPT, we aimed to detect the CYP2C19 gene polymorphism from noninvasive samples to determine extensive metabolizers (EMs) and PMs of CYP2C19.

Methods

DNA samples were extracted from hair, buccal mucosa, and blood cells. Primers and cycling probes were designed specifically for region G636A for exon 4 and G681A for exon 5, reported to be gene polymorphisms of CYP2C19.

Results

DNA extracted from hair follicle cells and buccal epithelial cells was the same as that collected from invasive blood sampling. The genotype of CYP2C19 was successfully identified as either EM or PM in 71 samples, producing identical results to those for the TaqMan method, except in three samples.

Conclusions

We successfully detected the two gene polymorphisms of CYP2C19 from noninvasive samples using a simple DNA extraction method and CPT.