1
|
McBain K, Dinh C, Haffar M, Steinberg E, Cachecho S, Bussières A, Dahan-Oliel N. Perspectives from clinicians and managers: facilitators and barriers to the uptake of rehabilitation guidance for children with arthrogryposis. Disabil Rehabil 2023:1-17. [PMID: 37782214 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2263361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the perceived facilitators and barriers among clinicians and managers about the uptake of expert guidance for rehabilitation of children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) in practice. METHODS Qualitative study using individual interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), to explore beliefs and to identify facilitators and barriers to guidance uptake. Interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 15 clinicians working with children with AMC and four pediatric clinical managers using Microsoft Teams©. Interviews were then transcribed verbatim and analyzed by four independent reviewers using deductive and inductive coding. RESULTS The TDF domains of Environmental Context and Resources, Behavioural Regulation, Reinforcement, Beliefs about Consequences, and Social Influences were shared amongst clinicians and clinical managers across North America and Europe as being relevant and influential on the target behaviour of using rehabilitation expert guidance to manage pediatric patients. Among clinicians only, the domain Memory, Attention, and Decision-Making Processes was also found relevant. Among managers only, the domain Social/Professional Role and Identity was found relevant. CONCLUSIONS Coupling shared relevant domains amongst clinicians and managers with individual supports and barriers helps to map out what is needed to promote the uptake of rehabilitation guidance at multiple levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly McBain
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Cameron Dinh
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Melanie Haffar
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Emily Steinberg
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sarah Cachecho
- Clinical Research Department, Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Noémi Dahan-Oliel
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Clinical Research Department, Shriners Hospital for Children, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gaid D, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Barriers and Facilitators to Knowledge Brokering Activities: Perspectives from Knowledge Brokers Working in Canadian Rehabilitation Settings. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2023; 43:87-95. [PMID: 36859412 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge translation experts advocate for employing knowledge brokers (KBs) to promote the uptake of research evidence in health care settings. Yet, no previous research has identified potential barriers for KBs to promote the uptake of research evidence in rehabilitation settings. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators for KBs in Canadian rehabilitation settings as perceived by individuals serving as KBs. METHODS Qualitative study using semistructured telephone interviews with individuals performing KB activities in rehabilitation settings across Canada. The interview topic guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and consisted of 20 questions covering three domains (characteristics of individuals, inner setting, and outer settings). We conducted qualitative descriptive analysis combining deductive coding guided by the CFIR. RESULTS Characteristics of individuals included having communication skills, clinical experience, research skills, and interpersonal features, in addition to being confident and motivated and receiving training. The inner setting domain included having constant networking with stakeholders and being aware of stakeholders' needs, in addition to resources availability, leadership engagement, knowledge accessibility, prioritizing brokering activities, and monitoring KBs' performance. Finally, the outer setting domain showed that KBs need to be connected to a community of practice to promote information exchange and avoid work duplications. DISCUSSION Factors likely to hinder or promote the optimal use of KBs within Canadian rehabilitation settings include skill sets and networking abilities; organizational culture, resources, and leadership engagement; and the need for specific training for KBs and for evaluation tools to monitor their performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Gaid
- Dr. Gaid: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Ahmed: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Research Institute McGill University Health Center, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Thomas: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Institute of Health Sciences Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Bussières: Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, and McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hurtubise K, Gaboury I, Berbari J, Battista MC, Schuster T, Phoenix M, Rosenbaum P, Kraus De Camargo O, Lovo S, Pritchard-Wiart L, Zwicker JG, Beaudoin AJ, Morin M, Poder T, Gagnon MP, Roch G, Levac D, Tousignant M, Colquhoun H, Miller K, Churchill J, Robeson P, Ruegg A, Nault M, Camden C. Training Intervention and Program of Support (TIPS) for fostering adoption of family-centred telehealth in pediatric rehabilitation: Protocol for a multi-method, prospective hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness study (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e40218. [PMID: 36306158 PMCID: PMC9652740 DOI: 10.2196/40218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Children with disability face long wait times for rehabilitation services. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth adoption was low across pediatric rehabilitation. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, pediatric therapists were asked to rapidly shift to telehealth, often with minimal training. To facilitate the behavior changes necessary for telehealth adoption, provision of appropriate evidence-based training and support is required. However, evidence to support the effective implementation of such training is lacking. The successful real-world implementation of a training intervention and program of support (TIPS) targeting pediatric therapists to enhance the adoption of family-centered telerehabilitation (FCT) requires the evaluation of both implementation and effectiveness. Objective This study aimed to evaluate TIPS implementation in different pediatric rehabilitation settings and assess TIPS effectiveness, as it relates to therapists’ adoption, service wait times, families’ perception of service quality, and costs. Methods This 4-year, pan-Canadian study involves managers, pediatric occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech-language pathologists, and families from 20 sites in 8 provincial jurisdictions. It will use a multimethod, prospective, hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness design. An interrupted time series will assess TIPS implementation. TIPS will comprise a 1-month training intervention with self-paced learning modules and a webinar, followed by an 11-month support program, including monthly site meetings and access to a virtual community of practice. Longitudinal mixed modeling will be used to analyze indicators of therapists’ adoption of and fidelity to FCT collected at 10 time points. To identify barriers and facilitators to adoption and fidelity, qualitative data will be collected during implementation and analyzed using a deductive-inductive thematic approach. To evaluate effectiveness, a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design will use questionnaires to evaluate TIPS effectiveness at service, therapist, and family levels. Generalized linear mixed effects models will be used in data analysis. Manager, therapist, and family interviews will be conducted after implementation and analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. Finally, cost data will be gathered to calculate public system and societal costs. Results Ethics approval has been obtained from 2 jurisdictions (February 2022 and July 2022); approval is pending in the others. In total, 20 sites have been recruited, and data collection is anticipated to start in September 2022 and is projected to be completed by September 2024. Data analysis will occur concurrently with data collection, with results disseminated throughout the study period. Conclusions This study will generate knowledge about the effectiveness of TIPS targeting pediatric therapists to enhance FCT adoption in pediatric rehabilitation settings, identify facilitators for and barriers to adoption, and document the impact of telehealth adoption on therapists, services, and families. The study knowledge gained will refine the training intervention, enhance intervention uptake, and support the integration of telehealth as a consistent pediatric rehabilitation service option for families of children with disabilities. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05312827; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05312827 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/40218
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hurtubise
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster Univeristy, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Isabelle Gaboury
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada
| | - Jade Berbari
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Battista
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Tibor Schuster
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill Univeristy, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michelle Phoenix
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster Univeristy, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Rosenbaum
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Olaf Kraus De Camargo
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Stacey Lovo
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | - Jill G Zwicker
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Audrée Jeanne Beaudoin
- Institut Universitaire de Première Ligne en Santé et Services Sociaux, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine et Sciences de la Santé, Univeristé de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Mélanie Morin
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine et Sciences de la Santé, Univeristé de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas Poder
- School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Québec-Univeristé Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, Univeristé Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Geneviève Roch
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Québec-Univeristé Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, Univeristé Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Danielle Levac
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Univeristé de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Tousignant
- École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine et Sciences de la Santé, Univeristé de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kimberly Miller
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Univeristy of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Andréa Ruegg
- Training Intervention and Program of Support Study Team, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Martine Nault
- Training Intervention and Program of Support Study Team, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Chantal Camden
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine et Sciences de la Santé, Univeristé de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kolb WH, Bade MJ, Bradberry C. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for low back pain: A case control cohort study of knowledge translation in a multi-site healthcare organization. J Eval Clin Pract 2022; 28:288-302. [PMID: 34761482 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE The benefits of clinical practice guideline (CPG) adoption for the management of patients with back pain are well documented. However, the gap between knowledge creation and implementation remains wide with few studies documenting the iterative process of comprehensive implementation in clinical settings. The objective of this study was to improve adherent physical therapy care according to CPG's for low back pain and describe the knowledge to action (K2A) process used in a rural healthcare organization. METHODS A prospective case control cohort design was used to evaluate physical therapy provider practice changes during an 18 month intervention. Four clinical sites were selected, two of which received multifaceted educational and process interventions tailored to feedback from ongoing K2A cycle outcomes. Overall program assessment included monthly charge code reports for adherence and a pre-post survey of confidence for guideline use. Pragmatic Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) criteria were used to complete the process evaluation. RESULTS A significant difference (p < 0.001, mean difference 13.5, CI [8.5,18.5]) for charge code adherence favoured education site-1 over control site-2 after implementation. Adherence scores remained above target at both education sites 18 months after implementation. Survey differences were significant for confidence scores at education sites in use of the cognitive behavioural category, overall treatment category use and guideline communication. Process evaluation supported multifaceted interventions tailored to education sites with average cost measured by staff education time of 15.5 h per therapist trained. CONCLUSION This study extends the literature of guideline implementation by describing the unique cycles required for promoting provider behaviour change within a rural healthcare system. Adherence and confidence results suggest increased provider CPG use which was supported by the process evaluation. This study demonstrates the importance of multiple site comparisons, long-term reporting and standardized frameworks for assessment of real-world CPG implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Kolb
- Department of Physical Therapy, Radford University Waldron College of Health Professions, Radford University Carilion Campus, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Michael J Bade
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Caleb Bradberry
- School of Computing and Information Sciences, Radford University Artis College of Science and Technology, Radford, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boutcher F, Berta W, Urquhart R, Gagliardi AR. The roles, activities and impacts of middle managers who function as knowledge brokers to improve care delivery and outcomes in healthcare organizations: a critical interpretive synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:11. [PMID: 34974827 PMCID: PMC8722036 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07387-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Middle Managers (MMs) are thought to play a pivotal role as knowledge brokers (KBs) in healthcare organizations. However, the role of MMs who function as KBs (MM KBs) in health care is under-studied. Research is needed that contributes to our understanding of how MMs broker knowledge in health care and what factors influence their KB efforts. Methods We used a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) approach to review both qualitative and quantitative studies to develop an organizing framework of how MMs enact the KB role in health care. We used compass questions to create a search strategy and electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Social Sciences Abstracts, ABI/INFORM, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC and the Cochrane Library. Searching, sampling, and data analysis was an iterative process, using constant comparison, to synthesize the results. Results We included 41 articles (38 empirical studies and 3 conceptual papers) that met the eligibility criteria. No existing review was found on this topic. A synthesis of the studies revealed 12 MM KB roles and 63 associated activities beyond existing roles hypothesized by extant theory, and we elaborate on two MM KB roles: 1) convincing others of the need for, and benefit of an innovation or evidence-based practice; and 2) functioning as a strategic influencer. We identified organizational and individual factors that may influence the efforts of MM KBs in healthcare organizations. Additionally, we found that the MM KB role was associated with enhanced provider knowledge, and skills, as well as improved organizational outcomes. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MMs do enact KB roles in healthcare settings to implement innovations and practice change. Our organizing framework offers a novel conceptualization of MM KBs that advances understanding of the emerging KB role that MMs play in healthcare organizations. In addition to roles, this study contributes to the extant literature by revealing factors that may influence the efforts and impacts of MM KBs in healthcare organizations. Future studies are required to refine and strengthen this framework. Trial registration A protocol for this review was not registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07387-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Boutcher
- Baycrest Health Sciences, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada.
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building Suite 425, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- University Health Network, 13EN-228, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gaid D, Mate K, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Nationwide Environmental Scan of Knowledge Brokers Training. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2022; 42:e3-e11. [PMID: 33929357 PMCID: PMC8876370 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge brokers (KBs) can promote the uptake of best practice guidelines in rehabilitation. Although many institutions offer training opportunities to health care professionals who wish to undertake KBs roles, the characteristics and content of those educational training opportunities (ETOs) are currently unknown. This study aimed to describe the ETOs available to rehabilitation professionals in Canada and determine whether the ETOs meet the competencies expected of the KBs roles. METHODS We conducted a Canada-wide environmental scan to identify ETOs using three strategies: online search, phone calls, and snowball. To be included in the study, ETOs had to be offered to rehabilitation professionals in Canada and be targeting KBs competencies and/or roles. We mapped each of the content to the KBs competencies (knowledge and skills) within the five roles of KBs: information manager, linking agent, capacity builder, facilitator, and evaluator. RESULTS A total of 51 ETOs offered in three Canadian provinces, British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, were included in the analysis. For KBs competencies, 76% of ETOs equipped attendees with research skills, 55% with knowledge brokering skills, and 53% with knowledge on implementation science. For KBs roles, over 60% of ETOs supported attendees to in performing the capacity builder role and 39% the evaluator role. DISCUSSION Findings suggest that ETOs focused primarily on preparing participants with the research and knowledge brokering skills required to perform the capacity builder and evaluator roles. Comprehensive educational training covering all KBs roles and competencies are needed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaid D, Ahmed S, Alhasani R, Thomas A, Bussières A. Determinants that influence knowledge brokers' and opinion leaders' role to close knowledge practice gaps in rehabilitation: A realist review. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:836-846. [PMID: 32975895 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Despite the available evidence to support optimal practices in rehabilitation, significant knowledge practice gaps persist. Opinion leaders (OLs) and knowledge brokers (KBs) can enhance the success of knowledge translation (KT) interventions and improve uptake of best practices among clinicians. However, the literature on the mechanisms underpinning OLs'/KBs' activities, and guidance on the type of support needed for successful implementation of these roles in rehabilitation contexts is scarce. This research aimed to highlight the differences and similarities between OLs and KBs with respect to context, mechanism, and outcomes as well as describe the common patterns of OLs and KBs by creating a context-mechanism-outcomes configuration. METHODS We conducted a realist review to synthesize the available evidence on OLs/KBs as active KT strategies. A search was conducted across five databases up to November 2019. Two independent reviewers extracted the data using a structured form. A context-mechanism-outcome configuration was used to conceptualize a cumulative portrait of the features of OLs/KBs roles. RESULTS The search identified 3282 titles after removing duplicates. Seventeen studies (reported in 20 articles) were included in the review. Findings suggest a number of desirable features of OLs/KBs roles that may maximize the achievement of targeted outcomes namely being (a) embedded within their organization as "insiders"; (b) adequately skilled to perform their role; (c) identified as able to fulfil the role; (d) appropriately trained; and (e) able to use different KT interventions. CONCLUSION Findings of this realist review converge to create a context-mechanism-outcomes configuration with suggestions to optimally utilize OLs/KBs in rehabilitation. The configurations suggest desirable features that can lead to a greater potential to achieve targeted goals. It is preferable that OLs/KBs be embedded in the organization and that they are adequately skilful and well-trained. Also, OLs/KBs should perform the required roles using KT interventions adapted to the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Gaid
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sara Ahmed
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Rehab Alhasani
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aliki Thomas
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Albers B, Metz A, Burke K. Implementation support practitioners - a proposal for consolidating a diverse evidence base. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:368. [PMID: 32357877 PMCID: PMC7193379 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05145-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Workforce development for implementation practice has been identified as a grand challenge in health services. This is due to the embryonic nature of the existing research in this area, few available training programs and a general shortage of frontline service staff trained and prepared for practicing implementation in the field. The interest in the role of "implementation support" as a way to effectively build the implementation capacities of the human service sector has therefore increased. However, while frequently used, little is known about the skills and competencies required to effectively provide such support. MAIN BODY To progress the debate and the research agenda on implementation support competencies, we propose the role of the "implementation support practitioner" as a concept unifying the multiple streams of research focused on e.g. consultation, facilitation, or knowledge brokering. Implementation support practitioners are professionals supporting others in implementing evidence-informed practices, policies and programs, and in sustaining and scaling evidence for population impact. They are not involved in direct service delivery or management and work closely with the leadership and staff needed to effectively deliver direct clinical, therapeutic or educational services to individuals, families and communities. They may be specialists or generalists and be located within and/or outside the delivery system they serve. To effectively support the implementation practice of others, implementation support practitioners require an ability to activate implementation-relevant knowledge, skills and attitudes, and to operationalize and apply these in the context of their support activities. In doing so, they aim to trigger both relational and behavioral outcomes. This thinking is reflected in an overarching logic outlined in this article. CONCLUSION The development of implementation support practitioners as a profession necessitates improved conceptual thinking about their role and work and how they enable the uptake and integration of evidence in real world settings. This article introduces a preliminary logic conceptualizing the role of implementation support practitioners informing research in progress aimed at increasing our knowledge about implementation support and the competencies needed to provide this support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Albers
- European Implementation Collaborative, Søborg, Denmark
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Allison Metz
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Katie Burke
- Centre for Effective Services, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Restall G, Diaz F, Wittmeier K. Why Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Get Stuck during Implementation and What Can Be Done: A Case Study in Pediatric Rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2020; 40:217-230. [PMID: 31480881 DOI: 10.1080/01942638.2019.1660447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Aims: The purpose of this study was to obtain the perspectives of occupational and physical therapists working in pediatric rehabilitation about the factors that influence implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) using the case of constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT). We aimed to identify factors that hinder implementation of CPGs and strategies for overcoming barriers when widespread implementation is stalled.Methods: Qualitative case study methodology was bounded within the parameters of CIMT implementation in pediatric rehabilitation in one jurisdiction. Twenty-one occupational and physical therapists participated in one of three focus groups. Data were analyzed using an inductive qualitative approach.Results: Participants viewed CPGs as useful, and emphasized the importance of consistency between guidelines and relevance to practice context. Therapists considered the "art and science" in clinical decision-making. Barriers and facilitators to CPG implementation were identified at the client, clinician, intervention location and systemic level. Potential solutions to help "unstick" guideline implementation were consistent with theories of collective knowledge exchange and mindlines.Conclusion: The presence of CPGs does not ensure evidence uptake; understanding of local barriers is required. This case study highlights the value of a collective knowledge exchange approach and attention to the social structures of knowledge development and evidence use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayle Restall
- College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Francis Diaz
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Kristy Wittmeier
- Physiotherapy Innovations & Best Practice Coordinator, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Winnipeg, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Banerjee-Guénette P, Bigford S, Glegg SMN. Facilitating the Implementation of Virtual Reality-Based Therapies in Pediatric Rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2020; 40:201-216. [PMID: 31416381 DOI: 10.1080/01942638.2019.1650867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Aims: Evaluate the impact of a multifaceted knowledge translation (KT) strategy for the implementation of virtual reality (VR) intervention by rehabilitation clinicians in a pediatric hospital setting.Methods: Eleven therapists were recruited and completed a questionnaire on perceptions on VR usage. A multifaceted KT strategy was implemented over five months. VR usage was tracked and clinician perceptions were reassessed. Baseline characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and a Wilcoxon signed rank sum test evaluated changes pre- and post-KT.Results: Perceived ease of use, behavioral control, self-efficacy, and barriers to use improved significantly post-KT; however, intention to use did not. Usage was higher pre-KT than the last two months of KT. Pre-KT, barriers included system setup and use, knowledge of games, and lack of resources, whereas post-KT, they were the lack of appropriate patients and patient-specific experience. KT supports and patient engagement were reasons for continued use.Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of supporting clinicians when implementing VR in clinical rehabilitation. Clinicians benefit from experiential and individualized learning opportunities, peer-led coaching, and hands-on training. Whether these strategies translate to increased usage and how usage is influenced by environmental factors (i.e. lack of appropriate clients) warrants additional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Bigford
- Development and Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie M N Glegg
- Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hurtubise K, Pratte G, Rivard L, Berbari J, Héguy L, Camden C. Exploring engagement in a virtual community of practice in pediatric rehabilitation: who are non-users, lurkers, and posters? Disabil Rehabil 2017; 41:983-990. [PMID: 29260923 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1416496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Communities of practice are increasingly recognized in rehabilitation as useful knowledge transfer tools; however, little is known about their users. This exploratory study describes the characteristics of participants and non-participants invited to engage in a pediatric rehabilitation virtual community of practice. In addition, we explored virtual community of practice utilization behaviors, engagement predictors, and the impact of strategies designed to foster engagement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants' demographics including information-seeking style and organization e-readiness, as well as online platform frequency of use data were collected and analyzed using descriptive, comparative, and predictive statistics. RESULTS Seventy-four percent of those invited used the virtual community of practice. Users had less years of experience in pediatric rehabilitation than non-users. Among the users, 71% were classified as "lurkers," who engaged through reading content only; while 29% were classified as "posters," editing online content. Predictive factors were not uncovered, however an increased number of forum visits correlated with being a poster, a non-information seeker, an employee of an organization demonstrating e-readiness, and regularly working with children with the virtual community of practice specific condition. User-engagement strategies increased visits to the forum. CONCLUSIONS These findings will assist rehabilitation leaders in leveraging rehabilitation-specific virtual community of practice to improve knowledge transfer and practice in pediatric rehabilitation and disability management. Implications for Rehabilitation Communities of practice are increasingly recognized as useful knowledge transfer tools for rehabilitation professionals and are made more accessible thanks to virtual technologies. Our virtual community of practice was found to be optimized in health care organizations with an electronic culture, when the topic area had daily relevance to its target audience, and was particularly beneficial for those who have limited years of experience in pediatric rehabilitation. A strongly committed, selected leadership team with the technological skills, content expertise, and designated time to maintain the site and to nurture discussion was deemed vital in fostering knowledge exchange in this context. User-focused engagement strategies showed promise in increasing visits to the virtual community of practice. Our study supports the importance of multi-pronged approaches in enhancing health care professional knowledge and skills Findings from this study will assist rehabilitation leaders in optimally leveraging rehabilitation-specific virtual community of practice to improve knowledge transfer in pediatric rehabilitation and disability management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hurtubise
- a Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Canada
| | - Gabrielle Pratte
- a Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Canada
| | - Lisa Rivard
- b School of Rehabilitation Science , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada.,c CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada
| | - Jade Berbari
- a Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Canada
| | - Léa Héguy
- a Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Canada
| | - Chantal Camden
- a Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Canada.,c CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada.,d Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cranley LA, Cummings GG, Profetto-McGrath J, Toth F, Estabrooks CA. Facilitation roles and characteristics associated with research use by healthcare professionals: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e014384. [PMID: 28801388 PMCID: PMC5724142 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementing research findings into practice is a complex process that is not well understood. Facilitation has been described as a key component of getting research findings into practice. The literature on facilitation as a practice innovation is growing. This review aimed to identify facilitator roles and to describe characteristics of facilitation that may be associated with successful research use by healthcare professionals. METHODS We searched 10 electronic databases up to December 2016 and used predefined criteria to select articles. We included conceptual papers and empirical studies that described facilitator roles, facilitation processes or interventions, and that focused on healthcare professionals and research use. We used content and thematic analysis to summarise data. Rogers' five main attributes of an innovation guided our synthesis of facilitation characteristics. RESULTS Of the 38 488 articles identified from our online and manual search, we included 195 predominantly research studies. We identified nine facilitator roles: opinion leaders, coaches, champions, research facilitators, clinical/practice facilitators, outreach facilitators, linking agents, knowledge brokers and external-internal facilitators. Fifteen facilitation characteristics were associated with research use, which we grouped into five categories using Rogers' innovation attributes: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability. CONCLUSIONS We found a diverse and broad literature on the concept of facilitation that can expand our current thinking about facilitation as an innovation and its potential to support an integrated, collaborative approach to improving healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Cranley
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Ferenc Toth
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Levac D, Glegg SMN, Sveistrup H, Colquhoun H, Miller PA, Finestone H, DePaul V, Harris JE, Velikonja D. A knowledge translation intervention to enhance clinical application of a virtual reality system in stroke rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:557. [PMID: 27716179 PMCID: PMC5052802 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1807-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite increasing evidence for the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR)-based therapy in stroke rehabilitation, few knowledge translation (KT) resources exist to support clinical integration. KT interventions addressing known barriers and facilitators to VR use are required. When environmental barriers to VR integration are less amenable to change, KT interventions can target modifiable barriers related to therapist knowledge and skills. Methods A multi-faceted KT intervention was designed and implemented to support physical and occupational therapists in two stroke rehabilitation units in acquiring proficiency with use of the Interactive Exercise Rehabilitation System (IREX; GestureTek). The KT intervention consisted of interactive e-learning modules, hands-on workshops and experiential practice. Evaluation included the Assessing Determinants of Prospective Take Up of Virtual Reality (ADOPT-VR) Instrument and self-report confidence ratings of knowledge and skills pre- and post-study. Usability of the IREX was measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). A focus group gathered therapist experiences. Frequency of IREX use was recorded for 6 months post-study. Results Eleven therapists delivered a total of 107 sessions of VR-based therapy to 34 clients with stroke. On the ADOPT-VR, significant pre-post improvements in therapist perceived behavioral control (p = 0.003), self-efficacy (p = 0.005) and facilitating conditions (p =0.019) related to VR use were observed. Therapist intention to use VR did not change. Knowledge and skills improved significantly following e-learning completion (p = 0.001) and was sustained 6 months post-study. Below average perceived usability of the IREX (19th percentile) was reported. Lack of time was the most frequently reported barrier to VR use. A decrease in frequency of perceived barriers to VR use was not significant (p = 0.159). Two therapists used the IREX sparingly in the 6 months following the study. Therapists reported that client motivation to engage with VR facilitated IREX use in practice but that environmental and IREX-specific barriers limited use. Conclusions Despite increased knowledge and skills in VR use, the KT intervention did not alter the number of perceived barriers to VR use, intention to use or actual use of VR. Poor perceived system usability had an impact on integration of this particular VR system into clinical practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1807-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Levac
- Department of Physical Therapy, Movement Sciences and Rehabilitation, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 407c Robinson Hall, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Stephanie M N Glegg
- Therapy Department, Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, 3644 Slocan Street, Vancouver, BC, V5M 3E8, Canada
| | - Heidi Sveistrup
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees (A121), Ottawa, ON, K1S 5S9, Canada
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Patricia A Miller
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Room 403, 1400 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada
| | - Hillel Finestone
- Bruyere Research Institute, Élisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada
| | - Vincent DePaul
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3 N6, Canada
| | - Jocelyn E Harris
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, IAHS Building Room 403, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada
| | - Diana Velikonja
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Regional Rehabilitation Centre, 300 Wellington St. North, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster Univerity, 12 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, l8S 1C7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hurtubise K, Rivard L, Héguy L, Berbari J, Camden C. Virtual Knowledge Brokering: Describing the Roles and Strategies Used by Knowledge Brokers in a Pediatric Physiotherapy Virtual Community of Practice. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2016; 36:186-194. [PMID: 27583995 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge transfer in pediatric rehabilitation is challenging and requires active, multifaceted strategies. The use of knowledge brokers (KBs) is one such strategy noted to promote clinician behavior change. The success of using KBs to transfer knowledge relies on their ability to adapt to ever-changing clinical contexts. In addition, with the rapid growth of online platforms as knowledge transfer forums, KBs must become effective in virtual environments. Although the role of KBs has been studied in various clinical contexts, their emerging role in specific online environments designed to support evidence-based behavior change has not yet been described. Our objective is to describe the roles of, and strategies used by, four KBs involved in a virtual community of practice to guide and inform future online KB interventions. METHODS A descriptive design guided this study and a thematic content analysis process was used to analyze online KB postings. The Promoting Action on Research in Health Sciences knowledge transfer framework and online andragogical learning theories assisted in the coding. A thematic map was created illustrating the links between KBs' strategies and emerging roles in the virtual environment. RESULTS We analyzed 95 posts and identified three roles: 1) context architect: promoting a respectful learning environment, 2) knowledge sharing promoter: building capacity, and 3) linkage creator: connecting research-to-practice. Strategies used by KBs reflected invitational, constructivism, and connectivism approaches, with roles and strategies changing over time. DISCUSSION This study increases our understanding of the actions of KBs in virtual contexts to foster uptake of research evidence in pediatric physiotherapy. Our results provide valuable information about the knowledge and skills required by individuals to fulfill this role in virtual environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hurtubise
- Ms. Hurtubise: Doctoral Student, Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Dr. Rivard: Postdoctoral fellow, School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, and CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Ms. Héguy: Research Assistant, Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Ms. Berbari: Research Coordinator, Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Dr. Camden: Assistant Professor, École de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, and Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|